G. Sand

Have you any sun today? Here it is stifling. The country is lovely.

When will you come here?

XIX. TO GEORGE SAND

Croisset, Saturday evening, ... 1866

Good, I have it, that beautiful, dear and famous face! I am going to

have a large frame made and hang it on my wall, being able to say,

as did M. de Talleyrand to Louis Philippe: "It is the greatest honor

that my house has received"; a poor phrase, for we two are worth

more than those two amiable men.

Of the two portraits, I like that of Couture's the better. As for

Marchal's he saw in you only "the good woman," but I who am an old

Romantic, find in the other, "the head of the author" who made me

dream so much in my youth.

XX. TO GEORGE SAND

Croisset, Saturday evening, 1866

Your sending the package of the two portraits made me think that you

were in Paris, dear master, and I wrote you a letter which is

waiting for you at rue des Feuillantines.

I have not found my article on the dolmens. But I have my manuscript

(entire) of my trip in Brittany among my "unpublished works." We

shall have to gabble when you are here. Have courage.

I don't experience, as you do, this feeling of a life which is

beginning, the stupefaction of a newly commenced existence. It seems

to me, on the contrary, that I have always lived! And I possess

memories which go back to the Pharaohs. I see myself very clearly at

different ages of history, practising different professions and in

many sorts of fortune. My present personality is the result of my

lost personalities. I have been a boatman on the Nile, a leno in

Rome at the time of the Punic wars, then a Greek rhetorician in

Subura where I was devoured by insects. I died during the Crusade

from having eaten too many grapes on the Syrian shores, I have been

a pirate, monk, mountebank and coachman. Perhaps also even emperor

of the East?

Many things would be explained if we could know our real genealogy.

For, since the elements which make a man are limited, should not the

same combinations reproduce themselves? Thus heredity is a just

principle which has been badly applied.

There is something in that word as in many others. Each one takes it

by one end and no one understands the other. The science of

psychology will remain where it lies, that is to say in shadows and

folly, as long as it has no exact nomenclature, so long as it is

allowed to use the same expression to signify the most diverse

ideas. When they confuse categories, adieu, morale!

Don't you really think that since '89 they wander from the point?

Instead of continuing along the highroad which was broad and

beautiful, like a triumphal way, they stray off by little sidepaths

and flounder in mud holes. Perhaps it would be wise for a little

while to return to Holbach. Before admiring Proudhon, supposing one

knew Turgot? But le Chic, that modern religion, what would become of

it!

Opinions chic (or chiques): namely being pro-Catholicism (without

believing a word of it) being pro-Slavery, being pro-the House of

Austria, wearing mourning for Queen Amelie, admiring Orphee aux

Enfers, being occupied with Agricultural Fairs, talking Sport,

acting indifferent, being a fool up to the point of regretting the

treaties of 1815. That is all that is the very newest.

Oh! You think that because I pass my life trying to make harmonious

phrases, in avoiding assonances, that I too have not my little

judgments on the things of this world? Alas! Yes! and moreover I

shall burst, enraged at not expressing them.

But a truce to joking, I should finally bore you.

The Bouilhet play will open the first part of November. Then in a

month we shall see each other.

The George Sand-Gustave Flaubert Letters · 第 31 / 277 题