The camp at Pirna was surrounded, and the pinch was soon felt. But

until hunger enforced surrender (for Frederick wished to shed no blood,

he wanted to amalgamate the Saxon troops with his own), much precious

time was lost, time of which Austria made good use. Frederick stopped

in Dresden, where he sought by means of ingratiating forms to make his

Draconian regulations more palatable; his purpose being to win over

public opinion by proving from the Saxon archives the necessity he had

been under. But here too he encountered resistance so embittered that

in breaking it down he brought the world, if that were possible, even

more than ever about his ears. The state papers were in the castle,

in the custody of the Queen of Poland, who was living there with her

children. Frederick she loathed; and she stoutly resisted all his

efforts to get hold of the documents. Frederick, however, was not

the man to shrink from using force against a lady. He sent a general

to the Queen, with definite instructions to procure the casket in

which the documents were, using force if necessary. The scene in the

Queen’s apartments is variously depicted. In any case it must have

been extremely humiliating to Augustus’s wife. She fought with all her

strength and with all her pride against surrendering the papers. We are

told that she defended with her own body the door to the cabinet; other

accounts say that she sat on the chest where they were kept; others,

again, that the casket was in her bed, and that Frederick’s general,

after prostrating himself, did not hesitate to violate this place

too. In the end the Queen had to comply, and Frederick got the papers.

He speedily had them published. But the advantage of publication was

outweighed by the harm done by this fresh evidence of his brutality.

The Queen called the foreign ambassadors together, gave them a vivid

account of what had happened, and declared that all the rulers of

Europe had been insulted in her person. Her daughter, who was dauphine

in France, threw herself publicly at the feet of Louis XV and implored

him, with sobs, to avenge her mother’s sufferings--a scene which moved

all Europe to tears of sympathy and righteous anger. The French envoy

in Berlin received orders to break off relations peremptorily. The

Prussian ambassador was forbidden the court at Versailles. Add to all

this that the Queen of Poland died soon after, killed, so everybody

said, by the ignominy she had suffered. For Frederick retorted upon her

conspiracies and agitations by having her closely watched, and she was

not spared further affronts. The King of Prussia, so we are told by

Count Vitzthum, treated the Queen not like a person of royal blood, but

like a canteen woman imprisoned in the middle of a hostile army. And it

killed her. The indignation against Frederick was boundless.

It was, in fact, so deep and general that a heart less stout, a temper

less sardonic than his might have quailed before it--yes, perhaps even

this heart did sometimes quail. In France, a country where he had

close intellectual ties, he passed for a savage, simply; they called

him nothing but the barbarian, the “monster of the north.” Indeed,

he might have searched the whole globe over for a sign of sympathy

and understanding and found none--no spot on earth where he did not

pass for the enemy of mankind, a ravening beast, to draw whose fangs

would be a moral act and a safe-guard to the public. He must be struck

down, must be rendered for ever powerless. Not only must Silesia be

taken from him; Prussia must be reduced to the position which was hers

before the Thirty Years’ War, the king of it once more a petty marquis,

powerless for harm. Yes, the hour had struck when the civilized

states must root out the Prussian spirit and rid the planet from this

poisonous growth. Even those who could still think objectively had to

admit that there was nothing left for Prussia but to sink under the

scorn and hatred heaped upon her by the world.

Quite aside from the material resources which such hatred had at its

disposition, the hatred remains in and for itself a thing to shudder

at. To fear that which is of the spirit is no disgrace; it involves

less cowardice than does fear of physical force. It is upon the

imponderables that the best hopes of victory are based; thus there is

nothing weak or foolish about taking cognizance of the imponderable and

the irrational where it sides against you. The hatred and revulsion

which Prussia roused might be as uninstructed and misguided as ever;

but the question which had to be raised was this: was it conceivable,

or humanly possible, that one man could bear up against the weight of

so general a feeling and carry off the victory? It takes more constancy

of spirit to confront a preponderance of moral feeling than to defy a

superior body of troops. Frederick had to admit to himself that in

case of his defeat the world’s rejoicing and the world’s scorn would

alike be unbounded; that he should get no justice, and not only that,

but that he should actually have been in the wrong. Even on this

ground, it was bitterly necessary for him to conquer. He was not in the

right, in so far as right is a convention, the voice of the majority,

the judgment of humanity. His right was the right of the rising

power, a problematical, still illegitimate, untested right, which had

first to be fought for and won. Defeated, he was the most wretched of

adventurers--_un fou_, as Louis of France called him. Only when success

had shown him to be the agent of destiny, only then would he be in the

right, and proved to have been always in the right. For every deed that

deserves the name is in truth a trial of fate, an effort to create a

right, to guide destiny and realize the course of development. And the

hatred felt against the doer of the deed is, psychologically speaking,

nothing else than an effort to influence the verdict of fate against

him--a naïve and irrational effort, because the verdict is settled

beforehand, but still a spiritual weight and pressure which might well

frighten the bravest. King Frederick is called the Great, not only

because of the audacity with which he laid siege to destiny, but also

and especially because he had the strength to bear up--alone, with

almost superhuman nervous strength--under so heavy a burden of hate.

But all the bitterness of soul, all the cynic disbelief in justice,

which characterizes him who thus tempts fate, speaks in those words

he uttered: “Poor mortals that we are! The world judges our acts not

according to our motives, but according to their success. There is

nothing left for us but to achieve it.”

So now they got their forces together, bodies of troops, armies, in

almost ridiculous superfluity, to overcome him and carve him up in

the shortest possible time at the least expense to each of them.

Each one looked forward to his share. Elizabeth of Russia displayed

great tenacity, she was far from dead yet, she hastened to join the

Versailles concordat and signed a special understanding with Austria,

by virtue of which she was to send eighty thousand men against

Frederick and harry the Prussian coast with her fleet. France, which

up to now had let herself be entreated, showed suddenly a hysterical

zeal. By the invasion of Saxony, she shrieked, the Peace of Westphalia

had been violated, shamefully violated, and the honour of all the

guarantors of that peace demanded that they speedily unite to execute

the evil-doer. A second Versailles Treaty arose, stating that France

would contribute a hundred thousand men and pay twelve million gulden

of yearly subsidy to Austria, until such time as the latter was once

more secure in the possession of Silesia, and Prussia reduced to the

dimensions she had before the Thirty Years’ War (according to which

contract France ought still to be paying to this day). The war against

Prussia, the alliance with Austria, was now so popular in Paris that

the French Academy offered a prize for the best verses in praise of

it; but the French government found the idea silly and suppressed

the offer. And that was not all. Frederick found that he had fallen

foul of the “Empire.” His act, they said, was a breach of peace of

the “_Reich_.” The Emperor commanded him to cease his unheard-of and

wicked sedition, to indemnify King Augustus and withdraw from Saxony.

He ordered all Frederick’s generals to leave their godless lord,

and not to partake in his hideous crime. And as all that did not

in the slightest avail, the whole of Germany (that blind Germany!)

rose against Frederick, sixty princes declared that his proceedings

constituted a predatory attack, and an imperial punitive campaign

was solemnly resolved upon. Sweden, one of the signatories to the

Westphalian Peace, and in leading-strings to France, had perforce to

resign herself to the conquest of Pomerania. And thus populations to

the tune of a hundred million rose against some five; fourteen princes

against one; seven hundred thousand of troops against two hundred and

sixty thousand. Frederick was putting it mildly when he said he was

risking his skin. Nobody had any doubt it would be all up with him in

the shortest possible time.

It will give me the very greatest pleasure to cite from his letters of

the period. They have a way of making one’s memory act in a contrary

direction--namely, forward and not back, a distinctly thrilling kind of

memory.

To the Marquis d’Argens in Berlin: “The French have gone mad. You

cannot imagine the disgraceful things they are saying about me. You

would think that the whole salvation of France depended on the house

of Austria; and the Dauphine’s dreams have made much more impression

than my manifesto against Saxony and the Austrians. In short, my dear

friend, I deplore the consequences of the earthquake that has addled

the brains of all the statesmen in Europe, and I wish them peace,

health, and contentment.”

To Privy Counsellor von Knyphausen of the Paris legation: “It is due

to the Austrian intrigues that I am obliged to recall you. When you

will have left Paris, nothing will stem the tide of slander against me.

My enemies will invent so many stories that the French will only see

with their eyes and hear with their ears. Well, if they want to be my

enemies, very well; it is their own choice.”

To his sister of Bayreuth: “But since things have been pushed to this

point, we must hope now that Providence, if it deigns to mix in poor

human affairs, will not permit the arrogance and malice of my enemies

to triumph over my just cause.”

To Schwerin: “We shall have, my dear Marshal, to confront many

foes--but I am not afraid. I have capital generals, admirable troops,

and if heaven preserve my understanding I hope also to give a good

account of myself.... But we must exert ourselves to the uttermost,

we must crush our enemies, we must fear no numbers, but rather count

it an honour that such a difficult task is ours to perform. We pay

rope-dancers, but not men who merely walk on solid ground; so in

this world all the glory is for those who triumph over difficulties.

Farewell, my dear Marshal, I embrace you.”

To his sister Amalie: “The coming campaign is to me what Pharsalus was

to the Romans, or Leuctra to the Greeks, or Denain to the French, or

the siege of Vienna to the Austrians. Such epochs are decisive, they

change the face of Europe. Before the decision one must endure fearful

hazards; but afterwards the sky is again clear and bright. Our duty

is now not to despair, but to foresee each event, and bear with quiet

countenance what Providence vouchsafes us, without arrogance at good

fortune, or depression at bad.”

To his sister of Bayreuth: “Germany is facing a severe crisis. I must

defend her freedom, her privileges, and her religion. If I am defeated

this time, it will be in this cause. But I am of good cheer; and

however great the number of my foes, I have faith in the goodness of my

cause, the admirable courage of my troops, and their steadfast will,

from the commanding officer down to the lowest soldier.”

To the same: “I am in the position of a traveller surrounded by a

band of rascals and about to be murdered in order that the murderers

may divide their booty among themselves. Since the League of Cambrai

there has been no instance of a conspiracy such as this villainous

triumvirate has forged against me. The thing is contemptible, a

disgrace to humanity and human morals. Has the world ever seen such

a spectacle as three powerful princes banding themselves together to

destroy a fourth who has never done them any harm? I have never had

any differences either with France or with Russia, and certainly not

with Sweden.... _O tempora, O mores!_ One might as well be living

among tigers, leopards, and lynxes as in this supposedly so civilized

century, contemporary of the murderers, thieves, and perjurers who

govern this poor world. Happy is he, my dear sister, who lives

unknown, and has been wise enough from his youth up to abjure any kind

of fame! Since no one knows him, none can envy, and his happiness

cannot make him the prey of every sharper.... They have laid a plot

against me, and the court of Vienna has been pleased to insult me; this

was more than my honour could endure. So the struggle begins and the

band of rascals fling themselves upon me; such is my fate.”

To Minister von Finckenstein: “Be not so fearful. Nothing is lost as

yet and nothing desperate. So long as I am alive I will stand firm and

defend myself like a lion.”

To his sister of Bayreuth: “We must all console ourselves with the

thought that our century is an epoch in the history of the world, and

that we have witnessed events so extraordinary that the course of

things has not for long brought forth their like. That means much for

our curious minds, but little for our happiness. Well, these villains

of emperors, empresses, and kings are forcing me this coming year to

dance upon a tight-rope. I console myself with the hope of giving one

or another of them a good crack over the nose with the balance-pole.

But when that is done, then peace must finally ensue. What a sacrifice

of men! What horrible butchery! I shudder to think of it. But I must

steel my heart and arm myself for murder and massacre; I must face the

odds heroically; though they are always frightful when you see them

close at hand.”

To Earl Marischal Keith: “You say my enemies malign me, even in the

far-away Escorial. I am used to that. I hear nothing but untruths

about myself. I have had more than my fill of the vulgar lies and

contemptible libels spread by hatred and venom all over Europe. But

one can get used to anything. Louis XIV must get just as sick of the

flatteries that are poured into his ears as I am of the shameful things

they say about me. These are unworthy weapons, which a great prince

ought never to employ against his peers; for he inevitably lowers

himself at the same time and exposes to the scorn of the vulgar things

which it is to the common interest of princes to hold in honour.”

To Finckenstein: “It seems unhappily that we are not yet at the end of

our task. We have too many enemies to be able to gain such superiority

over them as to enforce peace. All Europe is marching against us; it

seems to be the fashion to be our enemy, and a title of honour to

contribute to our destruction.”

To Voltaire: “You, who do not fight yourself, do not for God’s sake

laugh at others; be tranquil, be happy, that you have no persecutors,

and learn to be care-free and enjoy the repose you have at last

attained after chasing after it for sixty years.... Are you still, at

sixty, so lacking in common sense? And learn, in your old age, how you

ought to write to me. Please note that certain liberties are permitted

to writers and wits; but when they become impertinent it is too

much.... But enough, I have forgiven all, in a truly Christian spirit.

On the whole, you have given me more pleasure than pain. Your writing

has more power to cheer me than your scratches to hurt.... You cry

out for peace so loudly that I am fain to tell you to turn that lofty

impertinence of yours, which so well becomes you, against those who

are responsible for the delay in concluding peace.... Despite all your

efforts, I will never sign a peace save on conditions consonant with my

country’s honour. The people of your native land, puffed up as they are

with folly and vanity, may rely upon it that I mean what I say.”

To Ferdinand of Brunswick: “Unless France signs a peace with England

we are hopelessly lost; we have too many enemies, too many people

are disheartened by our disasters, and the morale of our troops has

plainly deteriorated. There is nothing left but for you to think up

an inscription for my tombstone. The great calamity will not come to

pass before the middle of August; but by then all will be lost beyond

repair. You know that I am usually not a pessimist; but now there is no

possibility of seeing anything else but black.”

To d’Argens: “The French are amusing asses. I like an enemy that makes

me laugh; I hate my grumpy Austrians, swollen with impudence and pride,

no good for anything except to make one yawn.”

To the same: “You value life as a sybarite, I look at death like a

stoic. Never will I survive that moment in which I am forced to sign

a disadvantageous peace; no eloquence, no inducement, can drive me to

subscribe to my own disgrace. I have told you, and I repeat: never will

I put pen to a shameful peace. I am firmly resolved to stake all upon

this campaign, to perform the most desperate deeds, to conquer or find

an honourable end.”

“The defence,” says Rancke, “earned him high esteem in the states of

Europe. In defending himself, King Frederick became the great man of

his century.”--That is true, and yet not true--in so far, that is,

as it considers Frederick’s war against Europe to have been a purely

defensive one. The dispute among historians as to whether it really

was that--and not rather a war of aggression--waxes louder than ever

today; but the situation is far too complicated, too involved, to

permit of a simple and final answer. In its very last analysis this

gigantic struggle was an offensive war; for the young, the rising

power is always, psychologically speaking, the aggressor, and the

others, the existing powers, are on the defensive against it. Somewhat

more superficially speaking, it was a defensive war, for Prussia was

actually “encircled” and was to be destroyed with all possible speed.

Then it was, again, an offensive war in that Frederick obligingly

picked the quarrel. Yet, once more, it was a war of defence, for

when the odds are one to five, that is tantamount to defence, even

though it was the one who actually declared war against the five--or,

rather, as a matter of fact, failed to declare it. And, fifthly,

it was an offensive war: on the ground that the most desperate and

difficult defence must always needs save itself by attacking. “Attack,

attack! Keep on their heels! _Attaquez donc toujours!_” To that tune,

instinctively, he had always disciplined his troops, he had even made

it instinctive with them; and to it he carried on war, unmindful of the

voices of those who urged him to keep on the defensive--in situations

like that of the year 1759, when the Russians were on his left, and

Daun on his right, and Sweden in his rear.

What friends he had were not worthy of the name. England regarded him

as her soldier against France, she was satisfied to have him hold

France in check in Europe while she quietly annexed the French colonies

in the New World; but, in the interests of business, she refused to

relieve him in the Baltic, against Russia; she paid subsidies as

long as it pleased her, and when it pleased her no longer she left

off. As we know, the war lasted seven years--seven is always the

number of years the princes and the miller’s sons have to serve in

the fairy-tale; but it was a seven years’ test a little severer than

ever falls to their lot; it was, without exaggeration, the severest

test ever a human soul has had to stand upon this earth. To stand it

required such passive and active qualities, such a measure of endurance

and patience, of inventive and resourceful energy, as neither before

nor since, to my knowledge, a man has ever displayed or had occasion

to display. Seven years long did King Frederick march hither and yon,

fighting, beating here one enemy and there another, being beaten

himself too, sometimes almost destroyed; staggering erect again because

he thought of something else which might still be tried; trying it,

with incredible, improbable success and coming safe off once more.

Always in his shabby uniform, booted and spurred, with his uniform

hat on his head, breathing, year in, year out, the dust of his own

troops, in an atmosphere of sweat, leather, blood, and powder smoke,

he would walk up and down in his tent, between two battles, a dismal

defeat and an incredible victory, and play on his flute, or scribble

French verses, or write quarrelsome letters to Voltaire. His mother

died, without his even seeing her; he felt now more forsaken than ever.

His favourite sister died--“_mon Dieu, ma sœur de Bayreuth!_”--and

his anguish at the loss testifies to the tenderness of his iniquitous

heart. In time he himself became grotesque; he was not unconscious of

the frightful comicality of his existence, he compared himself with Don

Quixote, with the Wandering Jew. “The ox must plough the furrow,” he

would say, “the nightingale must sing, the dolphin swim, and I--I must

make war.” He imagined himself condemned to carry on war up to the day

of judgment; he became a spectre to himself. The dreadful weariness of

spectres he knew, their pathetic yearning for rest. “The happy dead!

They are saved from all cares and troubles.” He kept poison always

upon him for the last emergency; but though the last emergency seemed

many times to have arrived, he did not take it, for always some other

plan occurred to him, and the emergency passed. Beneath the frightful

punishment, the cruel vicissitudes, the ceaseless tension, “the nicest

little creature in the kingdom” aged rapidly. He lost his teeth, his

hair went white on one side, his back got bent, his figure leaner and

leaner, he suffered from gout. And besides that, from diarrhœa. It was,

in fact, the tortures of the damned he suffered. But his fame grew

apace--his transgression, his breach of the rights of nations were

forgotten, but his fame as of the chosen of God grew and spread like

a tree and overshadowed the century. It was not alone that he routed

the hosts of Marshal Soubise at Rossbach--that same Marshal Soubise

who stole Alsace and set fire to the Palatinate--and became a hero to

all Germany, a symbol round which their torn loyalties might once more

twine. His deeds, and his sufferings, won him the sympathies of the

people of all nations. Yes, his defeats not less than his victories

occupied near and far the hearts of men, and the grotesque, the

Quixotic flavour, in his personality helped magnify him in the popular

eye and elevate him to a legendary fame: his picture, with the wry

mouth, the sparkling blue eyes, the three-cornered hat, the cane, the

star, the shoulder-cord--it hung in cottage and hall; while he still

lived he was a hero of legend. From now on he was called _der alte

Fritz_: an awe-inspiring name, to anybody with a sense of awe; for it

is really in the highest degree awe-inspiring to find the dæmon become

a household word and given a nickname.

He had outlived the hate, the psychic resistance, of the world; and

thereby had withdrawn an indispensable prop from the morale of his

foes. The rest was done by his radicalism, his readiness to go all

lengths, the depth of his resolution, which seemed to his opponents at

once so offensive and so frightful, like a strange and savage dog--in

the end they all shuddered before him. His moral advantage was that it

was always, with him, a matter of life and death, and that gave him a

sense of absolute values of which the others knew nothing. I will not

speak of his genius as a strategist, being a layman in that field.

And I wish not to speak of his “luck”; for it is always stupid to

distinguish luck from a man’s other merits and count it as undeserved,

instead of part of all the rest. Still, if you like, he was lucky. He

was on the brink of destruction when Elizabeth of Russia surrendered to

her love-affairs and left a poor simpleton named Peter to reign, said

Peter admiring Frederick to the point of idolatry, so that he struck

a peace with him at once. But the King had to win a few more battles

before the others saw at last that it was hopeless, and retired from

the field tired out. He went back home.

He had won nothing tangible, and his territories were ravaged,

depopulated, impoverished, run wild. But Prussia endured, not a village

lost; Silesia was safe, and the end and aim of the Great Coalition a

total failure. It was a deep humiliation for the continent at the hands

of a single man. The verdict of destiny, all the probabilities to the

contrary, had been rendered in his favour; it was impossible to dispute

it in the long run. They had to make way for Prussia, for Germany,

to follow its own path--a path which has since proved as steep and

fateful, as full of manifold and instructive turns of fortune, as any

path a people ever trod.

Three essays · 第 13 / 17 段