GEORGE AND FRANCES GEE.

It appears from the testimony of George Tarrier, and James Russell, of

Redcross-street; of Richard Jessop, of Castle-street; and William

Williams of the Mint; that the _Rev. John Church_, on the 16th of

November, 1809, also attended at the funeral of Richard Oakden, a clerk

in the Bank, who was hung before Newgate, for an abominable offence, on

14th November, 1809. This _pious_ minister and his partizans returned to

the Hat and Feathers, Gravel-lane, kept by a Mr. Richardson, where the

funeral set out from, to partake of a jovial dinner. His conduct here,

it seems, was beyond description.

It is averred, that his wife, upon hearing the infamy of his conduct took

to drinking, to avoid reflection, which soon occasioned her death. But,

within the last three months since, he has been charged with the above

detestable offence, in order (we presume under the mask of hypocrisy,) to

rescue, in some degree, his character from the public odium with which it

had been marked, he has been induced to marry a respectable woman, who

kept a seminary for young ladies at Hammersmith. The verdict of “Guilty”

had been scarcely pronounced, when the relatives of the children, with

the greatest promptitude possible, took them all away from the said

school.

Some time previous to the commission of the offence for which Church has

been at last convicted he made an attempt, in the open street, on the

person of a poor Frenchman, who had him conveyed to the watchhouse, where

a long examination took place, but the proof not being very conclusive,

the affair was hushed up.

Since his conviction, Church has resided at the house of _a friend_,

where _his followers_ are admitted to see him on producing a card signed

by himself, on which are inscribed certain texts of scripture. Will this

wretch never cease blaspheming the holy scriptures by his appropriation

of them!

It may not be improper to state one of the tricks made use of to threw

the prosecutor off his guard. A limb of the law, it appears, of the

_Jewish_ persuasion, _gratuitously_ offered to conduct the prosecution

for the young man; but upon a refusal being given him, on account of Mr.

HARMER being selected for that purpose, it was ultimately discovered that

this _philanthropic_ Israelite had been exerting himself towards

exculpating Church, with all the ingenuity he was master of in his

defence, from the heinous offence alleged against him. The “laws delay”

was resorted to, but only to put off the trial till the next assizes, but

the expenses materially increased, as a means of deterring the prosecutor

from proceeding. It is, however, lamentable to observe, that the charges

in bringing such a wretch to justice, should amount to eighty or ninety

pounds!

From the acknowledgement of this monster himself, the profits of this

_precious_ recepticle produced him from £1000 to £1200 annually.

At length, this precious hypocrite, who has so long set all decency at

defiance, by public preaching, notwithstanding his diabolical well known

propensities, has been found guilty of the crime he has so long (and so

numerously) been charged with. Much as it might be wished that such a

monster, under the disguise of that sacred habit, which at all times is

entitled to reverence, should be consigned with his crimes to oblivion.

But such suppression would be doing a serious injury to public morals.

Delicacy at all times ought to be a paramount consideration, but there

are cases in which a great deal more injury both to morals and liberty

may arise from the suppression than the exposure of indecencies. This we

apprehend to be one of that sort, and great care has been taken to avoid

entering into any disgusting particulars. It is due to the community at

large that such a dangerous character should be exposed to society, and

it is equally important to that sacred body, who can only rise or fall in

public estimation from their good conduct.

He will be brought up the first day of next term to receive judgement in

the Court of King’s Bench. Mr. Gurney we understand, although he so ably

and eloquently defended the guilty monster, Church, undertook his cause

with the greatest reluctance.

The Trial and Conviction of That Infamous Hypocrite John Church The Surrey Tabernacle Preacher, Borough-road, St. George's Fields, for an Abominable Offence; Including the Whole of the Evidence; Tried Before Lord Ellenborough, at the Surrey Assizes, Croydon, Saturday, August 16, 1817. To Which Is Added, His Life, Confessions, Notes of One of His Sermons, the Whole of the Love-letters, &c. &c. · 第 6 / 20 题