The following will cast some light on the preceding:—

“_Colchester_, _September_ 16, 1812.

“SIR,

“Last evening I had an interview with Clark’s father, who wishes him

to comply with your wishes. I mentioned to him respecting Church’s

conduct, and I find the last night to be the worst. Likewise that he

would have committed the act had not Clark prevented him. The

particulars I told you when in London, but find them worse than what

I described to you. They are not able to be at any expense; but if

the gentlemen wish to prosecute, and to pay Clark’s expenses up to

London, &c. he will have no objection to come when you please to

send. I need only say I wish you to inform the gentlemen, and give

me a line.

I am, dear Sir, your’s, &c.

C. WIRE.”

In addition to the above testimonies, a very long narrative of atrocities

committed by JOHN CHURCH; while he resided at Banbury, has been written

by a minister at that place; but the facts are too disgusting and

shocking to be published.

In the month of April, 1813, a Mr. Webster, who was employed in the house

of Messrs. Evans and Co. eminent Hop Merchants, in the Borough, having,

this being the time the first public exposure of Church’s character took

place, asserted his readiness to prove Church’s infamy, was immediately

seized upon by a fellow of the name of Holmes, and another creature of

the name of Shaw, a sort of attorney in St. George’s Fields, who had been

employed by Church, and dragged to a lock-up-house in the Borough, on a

charge of riot, of which the following account appeared in the Morning

Chronicle.

_Riots at the Obelisk_.—Tuesday, a Mr. Webster, who is employed in the

house of Messrs. Evans and Co. eminent Hop-Merchants, in the Borough, was

charged at Union-Hall, by a person of the name of Shaw, with committing a

riot and a breach of the peace, on Sunday morning, at the Obelisk, in St.

George’s Fields, near the entrance of a chapel belonging to a preacher

named John Church. The magistrate said, that as Mr. Birnie, who had, on

a former day, heard another case similar to this, was absent, they wished

the case might be deferred until next day, and desired Mr. Webster to

attend accordingly. The prosecutor observed, that it would be dangerous

to allow Mr. Webster to be at large, and desired that he might be kept in

custody or held to bail. The magistrate asked if there was any person

present ready to be bail for his appearance. Mr. Robert Bell, the Editor

of the _Weekly Despatch_, who accompanied Mr. Webster as his friend, a

housekeeper, in Lambeth, said he was ready to bail him. The prosecutor

then said, he had also a very serious complaint to make against Mr. Bell,

for the article which he published in his last Sunday’s newspaper,

respecting Mr. Church, and he had one of the papers in his hand. Mr.

Bell told the Magistrates that he was ready to meet any complaint of this

kind, that he conceived it to be his duty, as one of the guardians of

public liberty, and public morals, to send forth the statement in

question; that he could prove the truth of every thing he had written and

published. The worthy magistrate then asked Mr. Webster if he would

promise, on his honour, to attend next day, which Mr. Webster assured him

he would do, and retired. It is necessary to mention that Mr. Webster

had been kept in a state of imprisonment during the greater part of

Sunday, and all Sunday night.

April 7, 1813, Mr. Webster having appeared again before the magistrates,

disclosed, in the course of the examination, the fact of Church having,

some years since, made an attempt of an abominable nature, on the person

of his younger brother, the magistrate, struck with horror, immediately

stopt all proceedings against Mr. Webster, and desired his brother to be

brought forward. The office was cleared of all persons, except the

parties immediately concerned; the brother’s deposition was taken, and a

warrant was issued for Church to appear there the next day.

On Wednesday, J. Church appeared, in consequence of the warrant issued

the day before for his apprehension on a charge of abominable practices,

attended by a number of his deluded followers. Mr. W. Webster having

deposed as to his attempts on him, Church was ordered to find bail for

his appearance at the next Middlesex Sessions, and Mr. Webster bound over

to prosecute. The magistrate observed that from the length of time which

had elapsed since the offence had been committed, he thought a jury would

not feel justified in finding him guilty. Mr. Johnston, a young

gentleman of the law, who attended for Mr. Webster, replied, that it was

not the time for them to discuss what was likely to be the verdict of a

jury;—that he had recommended Mr. Webster to prefer an indictment against

Church, and Mr. Webster had come to that resolution; and whatever might

be the result of the trial, the evidence relating to the conduct of

Church would be of that disgusting nature as to stamp his name with

eternal infamy and disgrace. Church’s attorney observed that it was a

conspiracy amongst another sect to ruin Mr. Church’s character. This Mr.

Johnson denied and said that it was merely a desire to bring him to

merited punishment. Mr. Johnston also said that if Mr. Church acted like

a man of prudence, and consulted his own interest, he would desist from

preaching until the indictment had been tried, as it would be the means

of preventing a breach of the peace, but this he declined; and Shaw; his

attorney, said they should follow their own advice. Mr. Johnston

informed Church’s attorney that it was Mr. Webster’s intention to indict,

or bring an action against him for an assault and false imprisonment.

On that very evening (incredible as it may appear) this very man held to

bail for trial on the most horrid charges, given on oath, had the

impudence to go into his chapel and preach to a crowded audience.

On the 6th of June, 1813, the Grand Jury for the county of Middlesex

found a bill of indictment against John Church, for his attempt, some

years ago, on a lad, named Webster. On the 12th of July following, he

was tried and _acquitted_.—If any surprise is manifested at this

acquittal, let it be recollected, that this prosecution was ordered by

the magistrates, and did not _originate_ with the prosecutor, William

Webster, on whom the abominable attempt was alleged to have been made

(now fourteen years ago). The very mention of the attempt was a mere

incidental circumstance arising out of another proceeding then before the

Magistrates. Let the reader also take notice of the following

sentence:—“The magistrate observed, that from the length of time which

had elapsed since the offence had been committed, he thought a Jury would

not feel justified in finding him guilty.” This William Webster,

therefore, must be considered, in all respects, as an unwilling

prosecutor. He was supported only by one counsel, then of young

standing, (Mr. Adolphus,) who had to struggle against two of the most

able advocate (Messrs. Gurney and Alley) in the criminal courts. It

appears also that Webster gave his evidence with embarrassment and

trepidation, and that he suffered himself to fall into some

inconsistencies. With this _solitary_ and confused evidence, and after a

lapse—after a _silence_ of ELEVEN YEARS, was it possible to suppose that

a Jury would have found any man guilty? But the verdict did not, in the

slightest degree, affect any of the numerous accusations, of a more

recent date, which have been made against John Church. From the reports

that had gone abroad, that he was addicted to certain abominable

propensities, gentlemen in the neighbourhood of the Surrey Theatre,

dreading the disgrace of pollution which Christianity might suffer from

the immoral character of any of its teachers, investigated these rumours,

and the following fact came to light.—James Cook was released from his

two year’s imprisonment, on the 21st of September, 1813, the landlord of

the infamous house in Vere-street. They accidentally met and recognized

each other, and a correspondence took place between these _old_

acquaintances, on the 13th of October following. A _fac simile_ of the

letter has been published, in Church’s own hand-writing, offering Cook

assistance to set up another house, as may be perceived:—

“Dear Sir,

“Lest I should not have time to call or converse with you, as I shall

not be alone to Day, I thought it But right to Drop you a Line. I

wish you all the success you can desire in getting a house _fit for

the business_ in the public line; and, as you had a great many

acquaintances, they ought not to fail you; if every one acted right,

according to there ability, I am sure you would soon accomplish it.

As I am By no means Rich, but rather embarrassed, I hope you will

accept my mite towards it, 1l. 1s. and you shall have another as

convenient, wishing you all prosperity,

“I Remain Your’s sincerely,

J. CHURCH.”

For Mr. Cook, at Mr. Halladay’s, Richmond: buildings, Dean-street.

There is another letter bearing the two-penny post mark of the 20th of

October.—It is as follows:—

“Dear Sir,

“I received your note this morning in Bed, as I have contracted such

a Dreadful cold Being wet on Tuesday I am very much grieved i have

not been able to comply with the request concerning Mr. C— But I

shall certainly keep my eye upon him and Do him all the Good it lays

in my power where ever he is he knows my Disposition too well to

impute any remissness to my conduct But I cannot do impossibilities

as I have Lately had and have now Got so many Distressing cases in

hand Beside, I will Be sure to call on you as soon as I can—But am

not able to day

“I remain Yours, J. CHURCH.

“32 hercules Buildings”

Badly directed to Mr. Oliver, (or Holloway,) No. 6, Richmond’s

Buildings, Dean-street, Soho.

The following is a narrative which Cook has given of his acquaintance

with _Parson Church_; and which was taken down from his own dictation by

Mr. E— B—:

“In May, 1810, I was in company with Mr. Yardley and another young

man by the name of Ponder. I found after that the said Ponder was a

drummer in the Guards; I called at a house in the London-road, where

I saw Mr. Church the first time in my life: there was at this house

about twelve or fourteen altogether, drinking gin, and Mr. Church

handed me a glass of the same, which I took; Church behaved very

polite to me, and said what a fine fellow I was; he pressed me very

much to stop and get tea with them, for he said he would call and see

me when I was settled in the house in Vere-street. I stopped a

little while, and was about to leave them, when Church said I should

not go before I had tea, and flung down, a dollar; and a man, by the

name of Gaiscoin, took the money and went for the tea and other

things, but I would not stay: Church came out of the room with me,

and walked with me as far as the turnpike; there he met another

gentleman, which I never saw before, and I went on and left him for

that time; I think it was six or eight days. I went to live at the

Swan, and saw Church again; he came about three o’clock in the

afternoon, and Mr. Yardley accosted him, “Parson, what are you come

to see the chapel?” He said “Yes, and to preach too.” Church asked

me how I was; I said I was not very well: he asked me why I went away

in that shy manner; I told him he was a stranger to me, and I did not

like to be intruding on strange people: he said I was shy—he did not

know what to make of me; he also pressed me very much to take a walk

with him, but I declined it: he said I must go, but I still declined,

and did not go with him; he staid some time, and joined the company

in the back parlour—persons by the name of Miss Fox and Miss Kitty

Cambrick was among them, and the Queen of Bohemia. As Mr. Church was

going away, he came to the bar and spoke to me, and said I must take

something to drink, which I did, and he paid for it, and left the

house for that time. In a few days he called again, in the

afternoon, and there was not many people there; he asked if Yardley

was at home; I said he was not; he said he was very sorry for it; I

asked him what he wanted; he said he came on purpose for me to take a

walk with him, but I did not go: he said he would wait until Yardley

came in. Church said I should do him a great favour if I would take

a walk with him; I would not go—he still pressed me very much to go:

I said I would if he would wait till I had cleaned myself: he waited

more than two hours for me; I went to sleep because I would not go

with him; and in the mean time he waited so long that he was tired;

he sent the waiter to call me, which he did, and said the Parson

wanted me, and had been waiting two hours for me; I said, let him

wait, for I should not come; he returned, and said if I would but

speak to him, he should go away happy; I found I could not get rid of

him—I went down stairs; he said, well, sir, I hope your nap has done

you good; I said, I don’t know, don’t bother me. He said I was very

cross to him; I told him there was other men without me; if he wanted

to preach, not to preach to me about crossness. He said, well, if

that was the case, he was very sorry he had offended me; I told him

he had not offended me nor pleased me; but as I was not well, the

less any one talked to me the better I liked it; he said, if I was

but friends with him, and shake hands with him, he should go away

happy. Mr. Yardley said, he never see such a fellow as I was, for I

had affronted every body that came to the house. I then shook hands

with the Parson, for at that time I did not know his name. He shook

hands with me, and we had something to drink, and Mr. Church paid for

it and went away. I never saw him till I came out of Newgate; I was

talking to Mr. and Mrs. Holloway, and telling them there was a Parson

somewhere about St George’s Fields, but his name I did not know. He

asked me if I should know him if I saw him, I said I should; by that

I went to the chapel and saw Mr. Church, and then I asked the people

what was the Parson’s name; they told me his name was Church. I said

he ought to be ashamed of himself to preach there, a ******** and

rascal, and left the place, and went home in the greatest pains I

ever felt in my life, and was resolved to see him, which I did the

next day, and give him one of the hand-bills; and the manner he

received me, was like a young man would his sweetheart;—I began my

conversation; Well, sir, I suppose you do not know me? He said he

did not. I said my name was Cook, that kept the Swan, in

Vere-street. He said he thought so, but was not sure: he said why

did I not call before and shake hands with a-body. I told him I did

not know where he lived, nor I did not know his name until I went to

the chapel and found him out. He told me not to make it known that

he ever came to my house, for he and Rowland Hill had daggers drawn,

and that he should be obliged to indite Hill to clear up his

character, and for God’s sake do not expose me.”—(_Here the narrative

breaks off_.)

As an orator, he delivers himself in a full, clear, articulate, tone of

voice; but, to criticise his style, or analyse the _substance_ of his

discourse, would be a fruitless labour; it would be like dissecting a

cobweb. Unmeaning rhapsodies and unconnected sentences, through which

the faintest gleam of morality is not to be traced, must, from their

evanescent nature, set the powers of recollection at defiance, they even

escape the lash of contempt. But, to gratify the reader, the following

_notes_ of a SERMON was taken down in short-hand as he delivered it:—

“God is frequently going forth, and we also are often going to the

window to look for him; the more _vile I am_ made to appear to the

_world_, the more God will _assist_ me. Every citizen is a

free-born. Many have wondered how I could go through so much

trouble. There have been a great many that have wished to see me—I

can inform them, I had much rather they had wished to see Christ.

People may be laughed at for being fools, but, you may depend upon

it, the more God will like them. All that believe not will certainly

be damned. The duties of christianity are not to be preached to an

ungodly world. John Church is very much spoken of, but they had much

better speak of Jesus. The people of the established church feel no

spiritual joy. Spiritual discourse is enlivening to the senses. &c.

The bread of life is not to be given away to _dogs_. I am not going

to turn auctioneer, but I am going to inform you, that, next Lord

day, I am going to publish a book, proving that God, the Son, and the

Spirit, are all one great God. My sermon will be good news and

comfort to all poor sinners. Satan and all his spirits never sleeps;

the power of life and death is only in the hands of our Lord Jesus

Christ. Devils are allowed to harass the people of God day and

night,—no wonder they perplex those they can’t destroy. People are

mostly liable to fall, in their first love, into awful heresies and

temptation. All the Lord’s people do not see into the glory of my

text—’tis like a jewel in a rock of adamant.—The worst sin was the

murdering of God’s saints. When I sit in darkness the Lord will be a

light unto me. I am never tired of preaching, and, I believe, my

dear brethren are never tired of hearing me. Many men laugh at the

doctrine of the new birth—are there not many learned doctors that

know nothing of it? Let a man come under any circumstances, I will

receive him—Don’t laugh at the doctrine of inspiration; be wise, it

has often been preached by our church. If every one that is saved

should be as bright as the sun, what a place heaven must be, where

there will be so many millions! Angels beckon me away, and Christ

bids me come. The sight of Christ, you may depend on’t, will be

worth suffering for. O that I had the voice of an archangel, I would

indeed do wonders. I doubt the superiority of one angel over another

in heaven—Christ is entirely independent of or with God. We must

have the spirit of God before we are his people. Believe in the

predestination of eternal life, but not in eternal death; people that

suffer were before-hand predestined so to do _by God_. Bad or horrid

is the religion of a proud pharisee. The MOB is seldom stirred up

but through priests; there is now a case of the very kind: envy

bursts forth through jealous and envious neighbouring _priests_, and

published by _deists_, there can be nothing to fear; and, I verily

believe; that any thing prayed for to Christ will certainly be

granted, as has always been the case with me. Let us for ever

endeavour to turn every thing, whether good or bad, into good. I do

not care who hears me, whether _God_ or _man_, _friends_ or _foes_,

_devils_ or _angels_, or any thing else; and let them call me an

Antinomian again if they please. There must be spiritual life in the

soul. I do not believe that God begot Jesus Christ—they say too that

Joseph was an impostor, at this very day:—everything that is done

against the church is done against Christ; also, that which is done

against Christ is done against the church; and anything done against

the people of God is done against Christ. It is a most blessed thing

that we can throw our burthens upon Christ. That religion that is

preached by the people of God is God himself. There can be no going

forth until the spirit of God has entered. The Lord Jesus Christ and

the people of God are all one. Christ has no sorrow but the people

of God must sympathise with him; and the people of God have no

affliction but that Christ sympathises with them. This monster—when

he was about to preach, would frequently say to his

_favorites_;—“Well, I am going tip ’em a gammoning story, my old

women would believe the moon to be made of green cheese, If I was to

tell them so. And I must tell them something.”

In consequence of a respectable young tradesman, in the Borough, Mr. E—

B—, who was one of his hearers, becoming disgusted with his hypocrisy,

and some attempts he had made upon him, leaving him altogether, he wrote

the following beastly epistles:—

Had this wretch received a classical education, one might suppose he had

been writing a paraphrase on Virgil’s eclogue, beginning with the

line—_Formasum_ Pastor Corydon _Ardebat Alexin_.

Copy of a letter, written by the Rev. John Church, Minister of the

Obelisk-Chapel, Blackfriars’-Road, to Mr. E— B—, Rodney-Street,

Kent-Street, Borough, dated March 3, 1809.

“Dear Ned,

“May the best blessings be yours in life and in death, while the

sweet sensations of real genuine disinterested friendship rules every

power of your mind, body, and soul. I can only say I wish you as

much captivated with sincere friendship as I am; but we all know our

own feelings best. Friendship, those best of names,—affection, those

sweetest power,—like some powerful charm that overcomes the mind. I

could write much on this subject, but dare not trust you with what I

could say, much as I esteem you.—You would consider it unmanly and

quite effeminate; and having already proved what human nature is, I

must conceal even these emotions of love which I feel. I wish I had

the honour of being loved by you as much and in as great a degree as

I do you. Sometimes the painful thought of a separation overpowers

me; many are now trying at it; but, last night, I told the persons

that called on me that, let them insinuate what they would, I would

never sacrifice my dear Ned to the shrine of any other friend on

earth; and that them you did not like, him should have none of my

company at all. I find, dear Ned, many are using all their power to

part us; but I hope it will prove in vain on your side: the effect

all this has upon me is to make me love you ten times more than ever.

I wish opposition may have the same effect upon you in this

particular; but I fear not. However, I am confident if you love me

now, or any other time, my heart will ever be sat upon you, nor can I

forget you till death. Your leaving of me will break my heart,—bring

down my poor mind with sorrow to the grave, and wring from my eyes

the briny tears, while my busy meddling memory will call to

remembrance the few pleasant hours we spent together. I picture to

my imagination the affecting scene, the painful thought. I must

close the affecting subject; ’tis more than my feelings are able to

bear.—My heart is full, my mind is sunk.—I shall be better when I

have vented out my grief. Stand fast, my dearest Ned, to me: I shall

to you whether you do to me or no; and may we be pardoned, justified,

and brought more to the knowledge of Christ. O help me to sing—

When thou, my righteous judge, shall come

To fetch thy ransom’d people home,

May I among them stand;

Let such a worthless worm as I,

That sometimes am afraid to die,

Be found at thy right hand.

I love to be among them now,

Before thy gracious feet to bow,

Though vilest of them all;

But, can I bear the piercing thought,

What if my name should be left out,

When thou for them should call.

Learn these two verses by heart, and then I will write two more, as

they are expressions of mind, fears, sensations, and desires.—I must

close, I long to see your dear face again, I long for Sunday morning,

till then God bless you.

I remain unalterably thy dear,

thy loving friend.

J. CHURCH.”

Another letter was received by Mr. E— B— on the 15th of March, 1809, from

Church, without a date, as follows:

“Dear Sir,

“Is this thy kindness to thy once professed much loved friend, surely

I never, never, did deserve such cruel treatment at your hands; why

not speak to me last night in James-Street when you heard me call,

stop! stop! Ned! do, pray do; but cruel, cruel, Ned, deaf to all

intreaties—O why was I permitted to pass the door of Mr. Gibbons when

you and West were coming out. Why was I permitted to tramp up and

down the New Cut after you; I only wanted to speak one bitter,

heart-breaking, painful, distressing, word, farewell: I only wanted

to pour my sorrows into your bosom, to shake hands with you once

more, but I was denied this indulgence. I never, never, thought you

would deceive me—O, what an unhappy man am I; the thing that I most

feared is come upon me, no excuse can justify such apparent

duplicity; O, my distress is great indeed. O my God! what shall I

do? O Christ! O God! support me in this trying hour, what a night

am I passing through; I cannot sleep, its near three o’clock; alas!

sleep is departed, how great my grief, how bitter my sorrows, the

loss of my character is nothing to the loss of one dearer to me than

anything else. O let me give vent to tears; but I am too, too, much

distressed to cry; O that I could. I feel this like a dagger; never,

never, can I forgive the unhappy instrument of my distress in

Charlotte-street. Why did my dear friend Edward deceive me? O how

my mind was eased on Wednesday night; alas, how distressed on

Thursday. I have lost my only bosom friend, nearest, dearest,

friend, bosom from bosom torn, how horrid! Ah, dear Suffolk-court,

never surely can I see you again. How the Philistines will triumph;

there, so would we have it: how Ebeir, Calvin, Thompson, Edwards,

Bridgman, all will rejoice, and I have lost my friend, my all in this

world, except the other part of myself, my wife, and poor babes;

never did I expect this from my dear E— B—. O for a calm mind, that

I might sleep till day-light; but no, this I fear will be denied me.

How can I bear the piercing thought, parted; a dreadful word, worst

of sensations, the only indulgence, the only confident, the only

faithful, the only kind and indulgent, sympathising, friend, to lose

you. O what a stroke; O what a cut, what shall I do for matter on

Sunday; O that I could get some one to preach for me; how can I lift

up my head. O sir, if you have a grain of affection left for me, do

intreat of God to support me; this is a worse affliction than the

loss of my character nine months ago. A man cannot lose his

character twice. O, I did think you knew better; I did think I had

found one in you that I could not find elsewhere; but no, the first

object presented to you, seen suddenly, gained your mind, gained your

affections; and I, poor, unhappy, distressed, I, am left to deplore

your loss. O for submission, but I am distressed; woe is me. O that

I had never, never, known you, then I should never feel what I do;

but I thank you for your company hitherto, I have enjoyed it four

months exactly, but this is over for ever; miserable as I am, I wish

you well for ever, for ever. I write in the bitterness of my soul

which I feel. May you never be cursed with the feelings I possess as

long as you live. What a day I have before me! I cannot go out of

my house till Sunday morning. How can I conceal my grief from my

dear wife?—how shall I hide it?—what shall I say?—I am miserable, nor

can I surmount the shock at all. I have no friend to pour out my

sorrows to now, I wish I had; I am sorry you are so easily duped by

any to answer their purposes: my paper is full, my paper is full, my

heart is worse; God help me! Lord God support me! What shall I do,

dear God! O Lord have mercy on me! I must close; this comes from

your ever loving, but distressed,

The Trial and Conviction of That Infamous Hypocrite John Church The Surrey Tabernacle Preacher, Borough-road, St. George's Fields, for an Abominable Offence; Including the Whole of the Evidence; Tried Before Lord Ellenborough, at the Surrey Assizes, Croydon, Saturday, August 16, 1817. To Which Is Added, His Life, Confessions, Notes of One of His Sermons, the Whole of the Love-letters, &c. &c. · 第 3 / 20 题