INCLINATIONS MISTAKEN FOR AFFECTION

Let us take one more case. There are plenty of men who would like to

kiss every pretty girl they see, and no one would be so foolish as to

regard a kiss as proof of _affection_. Yet Lyon (another of the

witnesses on whom Westermarck relies) accepts, with a naïveté

equalling Captain Bourke's, the rubbing together of noses, which among

the Eskimos is an equivalent of our kissing, as a mark of "affection."

In the case of unscientific travellers, such a loose use of words may

perhaps be pardonable, but a specialist who writes a history of

marriage should not put the label of "affection" on everything that

comes into his drag-net, as Westermarck does (pp. 358-59); a

proceeding the less excusable because he himself admits, a few pages

later (362), that affection is chiefly provoked by "intellectual,

emotional, and moral qualities" which certainly could not be found

among some of the races he refers to. I have investigated a number of

the alleged cases of conjugal "affection" in books of travel, and

found invariably that some manifestation of sensual attachment was

recklessly accepted as an indication of "affection."

In part, it is true, the English language is to be blamed for this

state of affairs. The word affection has been used to mean almost any

disposition of the mind, including passion, lust, animosity, and a

morbid state. But in good modern usage it means or implies an

altruistic feeling of devotion which urges us to seek the welfare of

another even at the expense of our own. We call a mother affectionate

because she willingly and eagerly sacrifices herself for her child,

toils for it, loses sleep and food and health for its sake. If she

merely cared for it [note the subtle double sense of "caring for"]

because it is pretty and amusing, we might concede that she "liked"

it, was "attached" to it, or "fond" of it; but it would be incorrect

to speak of affection. Liking, attachment, and fondness differ from

affection not only in degree but in kind; they are selfish, while

affection is unselfish; they occur among savages, while affection is

peculiar to civilized persons and perhaps some animals.

Primitive Love and Love-Stories · 第 188 / 548 题