He tries to justify this assertion by adding that

"Man is in his wildest state a social being: a certain

degree of civilization and refinement ever produces the want

of sympathies still more intimate and complete; and the

gratification of the senses is no longer all that is sought

in sexual connection. It soon becomes a very small part of

that profound and complicated sentiment, which we call love,

which is rather the universal thirst for a communion not

merely of the senses, but of our whole nature, intellectual,

imaginative, and sensitive."

Here Shelley contradicts himself flatly by saying, in two consecutive

sentences, that Greek women were "certainly devoid of the moral and

intellectual loveliness" which inspires sentimental love, but that the

men nevertheless could feel such love. His mind was evidently hazy on

the subject, and that is probably the reason why his essay remained a

fragment.

Primitive Love and Love-Stories · 第 45 / 548 题