The Othello of the Fourth Act is Othello in his fall. His fall is never

complete, but he is much changed. Towards the close of the

Temptation-scene he becomes at times most terrible, but his grandeur

remains almost undiminished. Even in the following scene (III. iv.),

where he goes to test Desdemona in the matter of the handkerchief, and

receives a fatal confirmation of her guilt, our sympathy with him is

hardly touched by any feeling of humiliation. But in the Fourth Act

'Chaos has come.' A slight interval of time may be admitted here. It is

but slight; for it was necessary for Iago to hurry on, and terribly

dangerous to leave a chance for a meeting of Cassio with Othello; and

his insight into Othello's nature taught him that his plan was to

deliver blow on blow, and never to allow his victim to recover from the

confusion of the first shock. Still there is a slight interval; and when

Othello reappears we see at a glance that he is a changed man. He is

physically exhausted, and his mind is dazed.[100] He sees everything

blurred through a mist of blood and tears. He has actually forgotten the

incident of the handkerchief, and has to be reminded of it. When Iago,

perceiving that he can now risk almost any lie, tells him that Cassio

has confessed his guilt, Othello, the hero who has seemed to us only

second to Coriolanus in physical power, trembles all over; he mutters

disjointed words; a blackness suddenly intervenes between his eyes and

the world; he takes it for the shuddering testimony of nature to the

horror he has just heard,[101] and he falls senseless to the ground.

When he recovers it is to watch Cassio, as he imagines, laughing over

his shame. It is an imposition so gross, and should have been one so

perilous, that Iago would never have ventured it before. But he is safe

now. The sight only adds to the confusion of intellect the madness of

rage; and a ravenous thirst for revenge, contending with motions of

infinite longing and regret, conquers them. The delay till night-fall is

torture to him. His self-control has wholly deserted him, and he strikes

his wife in the presence of the Venetian envoy. He is so lost to all

sense of reality that he never asks himself what will follow the deaths

of Cassio and his wife. An ineradicable instinct of justice, rather than

any last quiver of hope, leads him to question Emilia; but nothing could

convince him now, and there follows the dreadful scene of accusation;

and then, to allow us the relief of burning hatred and burning tears,

the interview of Desdemona with Iago, and that last talk of hers with

Emilia, and her last song.

But before the end there is again a change. The supposed death of Cassio

(V. i.) satiates the thirst for vengeance. The Othello who enters the

bed-chamber with the words,

It is the cause, it is the cause, my soul,

is not the man of the Fourth Act. The deed he is bound to do is no

murder, but a sacrifice. He is to save Desdemona from herself, not in

hate but in honour; in honour, and also in love. His anger has passed; a

boundless sorrow has taken its place; and

this sorrow's heavenly:

It strikes where it doth love.

Even when, at the sight of her apparent obduracy, and at the hearing of

words which by a crowning fatality can only reconvince him of her guilt,

these feelings give way to others, it is to righteous indignation they

give way, not to rage; and, terribly painful as this scene is, there is

almost nothing here to diminish the admiration and love which heighten

pity.[102] And pity itself vanishes, and love and admiration alone

remain, in the majestic dignity and sovereign ascendancy of the close.

Chaos has come and gone; and the Othello of the Council-chamber and the

quay of Cyprus has returned, or a greater and nobler Othello still. As

he speaks those final words in which all the glory and agony of his

life--long ago in India and Arabia and Aleppo, and afterwards in Venice,

and now in Cyprus--seem to pass before us, like the pictures that flash

before the eyes of a drowning man, a triumphant scorn for the fetters of

the flesh and the littleness of all the lives that must survive him

sweeps our grief away, and when he dies upon a kiss the most painful of

all tragedies leaves us for the moment free from pain, and exulting in

the power of 'love and man's unconquerable mind.'

3

The words just quoted come from Wordsworth's sonnet to Toussaint

l'Ouverture. Toussaint was a Negro; and there is a question, which,

though of little consequence, is not without dramatic interest, whether

Shakespeare imagined Othello as a Negro or as a Moor. Now I will not say

that Shakespeare imagined him as a Negro and not as a Moor, for that

might imply that he distinguished Negroes and Moors precisely as we do;

but what appears to me nearly certain is that he imagined Othello as a

black man, and not as a light-brown one.

In the first place, we must remember that the brown or bronze to which

we are now accustomed in the Othellos of our theatres is a recent

innovation. Down to Edmund Kean's time, so far as is known, Othello was

always quite black. This stage-tradition goes back to the Restoration,

and it almost settles our question. For it is impossible that the colour

of the original Othello should have been forgotten so soon after

Shakespeare's time, and most improbable that it should have been changed

from brown to black.

If we turn to the play itself, we find many references to Othello's

colour and appearance. Most of these are indecisive; for the word

'black' was of course used then where we should speak of a 'dark'

complexion now; and even the nickname 'thick-lips,' appealed to as proof

that Othello was a Negro, might have been applied by an enemy to what we

call a Moor. On the other hand, it is hard to believe that, if Othello

had been light-brown, Brabantio would have taunted him with having a

'sooty bosom,' or that (as Mr. Furness observes) he himself would have

used the words,

her name, that was as fresh

As Dian's visage, is now begrimed and black

As mine own face.

These arguments cannot be met by pointing out that Othello was of royal

blood, is not called an Ethiopian, is called a Barbary horse, and is

said to be going to Mauritania. All this would be of importance if we

had reason to believe that Shakespeare shared our ideas, knowledge and

terms. Otherwise it proves nothing. And we know that sixteenth-century

writers called any dark North-African a Moor, or a black Moor, or a

blackamoor. Sir Thomas Elyot, according to Hunter,[103] calls Ethiopians

Moors; and the following are the first two illustrations of 'Blackamoor'

in the Oxford _English Dictionary_: 1547, 'I am a blake More borne in

Barbary'; 1548, '_Ethiopo_, a blake More, or a man of Ethiope.' Thus

geographical names can tell us nothing about the question how

Shakespeare imagined Othello. He may have known that a Mauritanian is

not a Negro nor black, but we cannot assume that he did. He may have

known, again, that the Prince of Morocco, who is described in the

_Merchant of Venice_ as having, like Othello, the complexion of a devil,

was no Negro. But we cannot tell: nor is there any reason why he should

not have imagined the Prince as a brown Moor and Othello as a

Blackamoor.

_Titus Andronicus_ appeared in the Folio among Shakespeare's works. It

is believed by some good critics to be his: hardly anyone doubts that he

had a hand in it: it is certain that he knew it, for reminiscences of it

are scattered through his plays. Now no one who reads _Titus Andronicus_

with an open mind can doubt that Aaron was, in our sense, black; and he

appears to have been a Negro. To mention nothing else, he is twice

called 'coal-black'; his colour is compared with that of a raven and a

swan's legs; his child is coal-black and thick-lipped; he himself has a

'fleece of woolly hair.' Yet he is 'Aaron the Moor,' just as Othello is

'Othello the Moor.' In the _Battle of Alcazar_ (Dyce's _Peele_, p. 421)

Muly the Moor is called 'the negro'; and Shakespeare himself in a single

line uses 'negro' and 'Moor' of the same person (_Merchant of Venice_,

III. v. 42).

The horror of most American critics (Mr. Furness is a bright exception)

at the idea of a black Othello is very amusing, and their arguments are

highly instructive. But they were anticipated, I regret to say, by

Coleridge, and we will hear him. 'No doubt Desdemona saw Othello's

visage in his mind; yet, as we are constituted, and most surely as an

English audience was disposed in the beginning of the seventeenth

century, it would be something monstrous to conceive this beautiful

Venetian girl falling in love with a veritable negro. It would argue a

disproportionateness, a want of balance, in Desdemona, which Shakespeare

does not appear to have in the least contemplated.'[104] Could any

argument be more self-destructive? It actually _did_ appear to Brabantio

'something monstrous to conceive' his daughter falling in love with

Othello,--so monstrous that he could account for her love only by drugs

and foul charms. And the suggestion that such love would argue

'disproportionateness' is precisely the suggestion that Iago _did_ make

in Desdemona's case:

Foh! one may smell in such a will most rank,

Foul _disproportion_, thoughts unnatural.

In fact he spoke of the marriage exactly as a filthy-minded cynic now

might speak of the marriage of an English lady to a negro like

Toussaint. Thus the argument of Coleridge and others points straight to

the conclusion against which they argue.

But this is not all. The question whether to Shakespeare Othello was

black or brown is not a mere question of isolated fact or historical

curiosity; it concerns the character of Desdemona. Coleridge, and still

more the American writers, regard her love, in effect, as Brabantio

regarded it, and not as Shakespeare conceived it. They are simply

blurring this glorious conception when they try to lessen the distance

between her and Othello, and to smooth away the obstacle which his

'visage' offered to her romantic passion for a hero. Desdemona, the

'eternal womanly' in its most lovely and adorable form, simple and

innocent as a child, ardent with the courage and idealism of a saint,

radiant with that heavenly purity of heart which men worship the more

because nature so rarely permits it to themselves, had no theories about

universal brotherhood, and no phrases about 'one blood in all the

nations of the earth' or 'barbarian, Scythian, bond and free'; but when

her soul came in sight of the noblest soul on earth, she made nothing of

the shrinking of her senses, but followed her soul until her senses took

part with it, and 'loved him with the love which was her doom.' It was

not prudent. It even turned out tragically. She met in life with the

reward of those who rise too far above our common level; and we continue

to allot her the same reward when we consent to forgive her for loving a

brown man, but find it monstrous that she should love a black one.[105]

There is perhaps a certain excuse for our failure to rise to

Shakespeare's meaning, and to realise how extraordinary and splendid a

thing it was in a gentle Venetian girl to love Othello, and to assail

fortune with such a 'downright violence and storm' as is expected only

in a hero. It is that when first we hear of her marriage we have not yet

seen the Desdemona of the later Acts; and therefore we do not perceive

how astonishing this love and boldness must have been in a maiden so

quiet and submissive. And when we watch her in her suffering and death

we are so penetrated by the sense of her heavenly sweetness and

self-surrender that we almost forget that she had shown herself quite as

exceptional in the active assertion of her own soul and will. She tends

to become to us predominantly pathetic, the sweetest and most pathetic

of Shakespeare's women, as innocent as Miranda and as loving as Viola,

yet suffering more deeply than Cordelia or Imogen. And she seems to lack

that independence and strength of spirit which Cordelia and Imogen

possess, and which in a manner raises them above suffering. She appears

passive and defenceless, and can oppose to wrong nothing but the

infinite endurance and forgiveness of a love that knows not how to

resist or resent. She thus becomes at once the most beautiful example of

this love, and the most pathetic heroine in Shakespeare's world. If her

part were acted by an artist equal to Salvini, and with a Salvini for

Othello, I doubt if the spectacle of the last two Acts would not be

pronounced intolerable.

Of course this later impression of Desdemona is perfectly right, but it

must be carried back and united with the earlier before we can see what

Shakespeare imagined. Evidently, we are to understand, innocence,

gentleness, sweetness, lovingness were the salient and, in a sense, the

principal traits in Desdemona's character. She was, as her father

supposed her to be,

a maiden never bold,

Of spirit so still and quiet that her motion

Blushed at herself.

But suddenly there appeared something quite different--something which

could never have appeared, for example, in Ophelia--a love not only full

of romance but showing a strange freedom and energy of spirit, and

leading to a most unusual boldness of action; and this action was

carried through with a confidence and decision worthy of Juliet or

Cordelia. Desdemona does not shrink before the Senate; and her language

to her father, though deeply respectful, is firm enough to stir in us

some sympathy with the old man who could not survive his daughter's

loss. This then, we must understand, was the emergence in Desdemona, as

she passed from girlhood to womanhood, of an individuality and strength

which, if she had lived, would have been gradually fused with her more

obvious qualities and have issued in a thousand actions, sweet and good,

but surprising to her conventional or timid neighbours. And, indeed, we

have already a slight example in her overflowing kindness, her boldness

and her ill-fated persistence in pleading Cassio's cause. But the full

ripening of her lovely and noble nature was not to be. In her brief

wedded life she appeared again chiefly as the sweet and submissive being

of her girlhood; and the strength of her soul, first evoked by love,

found scope to show itself only in a love which, when harshly repulsed,

blamed only its own pain; when bruised, only gave forth a more exquisite

fragrance; and, when rewarded with death, summoned its last labouring

breath to save its murderer.

Many traits in Desdemona's character have been described with

sympathetic insight by Mrs. Jameson, and I will pass them by and add but

a few words on the connection between this character and the catastrophe

of _Othello_. Desdemona, as Mrs. Jameson remarks, shows less quickness

of intellect and less tendency to reflection than most of Shakespeare's

heroines; but I question whether the critic is right in adding that she

shows much of the 'unconscious address common in women.' She seems to me

deficient in this address, having in its place a frank childlike

boldness and persistency, which are full of charm but are unhappily

united with a certain want of perception. And these graces and this

deficiency appear to be inextricably intertwined, and in the

circumstances conspire tragically against her. They, with her innocence,

hinder her from understanding Othello's state of mind, and lead her to

the most unlucky acts and words; and unkindness or anger subdues her so

completely that she becomes passive and seems to drift helplessly

towards the cataract in front.

In Desdemona's incapacity to resist there is also, in addition to her

perfect love, something which is very characteristic. She is, in a

sense, a child of nature. That deep inward division which leads to clear

and conscious oppositions of right and wrong, duty and inclination,

justice and injustice, is alien to her beautiful soul. She is not good,

kind and true in spite of a temptation to be otherwise, any more than

she is charming in spite of a temptation to be otherwise. She seems to

know evil only by name, and, her inclinations being good, she acts on

inclination. This trait, with its results, may be seen if we compare

her, at the crises of the story, with Cordelia. In Desdemona's place,

Cordelia, however frightened at Othello's anger about the lost

handkerchief, would not have denied its loss. Painful experience had

produced in her a conscious principle of rectitude and a proud hatred of

falseness, which would have made a lie, even one wholly innocent in

spirit, impossible to her; and the clear sense of justice and right

would have led her, instead, to require an explanation of Othello's

agitation which would have broken Iago's plot to pieces. In the same

way, at the final crisis, no instinctive terror of death would have

compelled Cordelia suddenly to relinquish her demand for justice and to

plead for life. But these moments are fatal to Desdemona, who acts

precisely as if she were guilty; and they are fatal because they ask for

something which, it seems to us, could hardly be united with the

peculiar beauty of her nature.

This beauty is all her own. Something as beautiful may be found in

Cordelia, but not the same beauty. Desdemona, confronted with Lear's

foolish but pathetic demand for a profession of love, could have done, I

think, what Cordelia could not do--could have refused to compete with

her sisters, and yet have made her father feel that she loved him well.

And I doubt if Cordelia, 'falsely murdered,' would have been capable of

those last words of Desdemona--her answer to Emilia's 'O, who hath done

this deed?'

Nobody: I myself. Farewell.

Commend me to my kind lord. O, farewell!

Were we intended to remember, as we hear this last 'falsehood,' that

other falsehood, 'It is not lost,' and to feel that, alike in the

momentary child's fear and the deathless woman's love, Desdemona is

herself and herself alone?[106]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 85: One instance is worth pointing out, because the passage in

_Othello_ has, oddly enough, given trouble. Desdemona says of the maid

Barbara: 'She was in love, and he she loved proved mad And did forsake

her.' Theobald changed 'mad' to 'bad.' Warburton read 'and he she loved

forsook her, And she proved mad'! Johnson said 'mad' meant only 'wild,

frantic, uncertain.' But what Desdemona says of Barbara is just what

Ophelia might have said of herself.]

[Footnote 86: The whole force of the passages referred to can be felt

only by a reader. The Othello of our stage can never be Shakespeare's

Othello, any more than the Cleopatra of our stage can be his Cleopatra.]

[Footnote 87: See p. 9.]

[Footnote 88: Even here, however, there is a great difference; for

although the idea of such a power is not suggested by _King Lear_ as it

is by _Hamlet_ and _Macbeth_, it is repeatedly expressed by persons _in_

the drama. Of such references there are very few in _Othello_. But for

somewhat frequent allusions to hell and the devil the view of the

characters is almost strictly secular. Desdemona's sweetness and

forgivingness are not based on religion, and her only way of accounting

for her undeserved suffering is by an appeal to Fortune: 'It is my

wretched fortune' (IV. ii. 128). In like manner Othello can only appeal

to Fate (V. ii. 264):

but, oh vain boast!

Who can control his fate?]

[Footnote 89: Ulrici has good remarks, though he exaggerates, on this

point and the element of intrigue.]

[Footnote 90: And neither she nor Othello observes what handkerchief it

is. Else she would have remembered how she came to lose it, and would

have told Othello; and Othello, too, would at once have detected Iago's

lie (III. iii. 438) that he had seen Cassio wipe his beard with the

handkerchief 'to-day.' For in fact the handkerchief had been lost _not

an hour_ before Iago told that lie (line 288 of the _same scene_), and

it was at that moment in his pocket. He lied therefore most rashly, but

with his usual luck.]

[Footnote 91: For those who know the end of the story there is a

terrible irony in the enthusiasm with which Cassio greets the arrival of

Desdemona in Cyprus. Her ship (which is also Iago's) sets out from

Venice a week later than the others, but reaches Cyprus on the same day

with them:

Tempests themselves, high seas and howling winds,

The gutter'd rocks and congregated sands--

Traitors ensteep'd to clog the guiltless keel--

As having sense of beauty, do omit

Their mortal natures, letting go safely by

The divine Desdemona.

So swiftly does Fate conduct her to her doom.]

[Footnote 92: The dead bodies are not carried out at the end, as they

must have been if the bed had been on the main stage (for this had no

front curtain). The curtains within which the bed stood were drawn

together at the words, 'Let it be hid' (V. ii. 365).]

[Footnote 93: Against which may be set the scene of the blinding of

Gloster in _King Lear_.]

[Footnote 94: The reader who is tempted by it should, however, first ask

himself whether Othello does act like a barbarian, or like a man who,

though wrought almost to madness, does 'all in honour.']

[Footnote 95: For the actor, then, to represent him as violently angry

when he cashiers Cassio is an utter mistake.]

[Footnote 96: I cannot deal fully with this point in the lecture. See

Note L.]

[Footnote 97: It is important to observe that, in his attempt to arrive

at the facts about Cassio's drunken misdemeanour, Othello had just had

an example of Iago's unwillingness to tell the whole truth where it must

injure a friend. No wonder he feels in the Temptation-scene that 'this

honest creature doubtless Sees and knows more, much more, than he

unfolds.']

[Footnote 98: To represent that Venetian women do not regard adultery so

seriously as Othello does, and again that Othello would be wise to

accept the situation like an Italian husband, is one of Iago's most

artful and most maddening devices.]

[Footnote 99: If the reader has ever chanced to see an African violently

excited, he may have been startled to observe how completely at a loss

he was to interpret those bodily expressions of passion which in a

fellow-countryman he understands at once, and in a European foreigner

with somewhat less certainty. The effect of difference in blood in

increasing Othello's bewilderment regarding his wife is not sufficiently

realised. The same effect has to be remembered in regard to Desdemona's

mistakes in dealing with Othello in his anger.]

[Footnote 100: See Note M.]

[Footnote 101: Cf. _Winter's Tale_, I. ii. 137 ff.:

Can thy dam?--may't be?--

Affection! thy intention stabs the centre:

Thou dost make possible things not so held,

Communicatest with dreams;--how can this be?

With what's unreal thou coactive art,

And fellow'st nothing: then 'tis very credent

Thou may'st cojoin with something; and thou dost,

And that beyond commission, and I find it,

And that to the infection of my brains

And hardening of my brows.]

[Footnote 102: See Note O.]

[Footnote 103: New Illustrations, ii. 281.]

[Footnote 104: _Lectures on Shakespeare_, ed. Ashe, p. 386.]

[Footnote 105: I will not discuss the further question whether, granted

that to Shakespeare Othello was a black, he should be represented as a

black in our theatres now. I dare say not. We do not like the real

Shakespeare. We like to have his language pruned and his conceptions

flattened into something that suits our mouths and minds. And even if we

were prepared to make an effort, still, as Lamb observes, to imagine is

one thing and to see is another. Perhaps if we saw Othello coal-black

with the bodily eye, the aversion of our blood, an aversion which comes

as near to being merely physical as anything human can, would overpower

our imagination and sink us below not Shakespeare only but the audiences

of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

As I have mentioned Lamb, I may observe that he differed from Coleridge

as to Othello's colour, but, I am sorry to add, thought Desdemona to

stand in need of excuse. 'This noble lady, with a singularity rather to

be wondered at than imitated, had chosen for the object of her

affections a Moor, a black.... Neither is Desdemona to be altogether

condemned for the unsuitableness of the person whom she selected for her

lover' (_Tales from Shakespeare_). Others, of course, have gone much

further and have treated all the calamities of the tragedy as a sort of

judgment on Desdemona's rashness, wilfulness and undutifulness. There is

no arguing with opinions like this; but I cannot believe that even Lamb

is true to Shakespeare in implying that Desdemona is in some degree to

be condemned. What is there in the play to show that Shakespeare

regarded her marriage differently from Imogen's?]

[Footnote 106: When Desdemona spoke her last words, perhaps that line of

the ballad which she sang an hour before her death was still busy in her

brain,

Let nobody blame him: his scorn I approve.

Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth · 第 15 / 40 段