I wonder whether all the pilgrims who have undertaken the journey

"from this world to that which is to come" ever lose the pack

whose fastenings were so quickly dissolved when our favorite old

Pilgrim looked upon the Cross? I doubt it. I hear many people

groaning throughout the whole course of their Christian experience

with the oppressive weight of this same burden. Instead of losing

it at the sight of the cross, they hold to it, and will not let it

go. They mean well enough; but they do not understand that the

cross was reared, and the meek sufferer nailed to it, that the

burden of the penitent soul might be forever rolled off. They

carry their own sins, and never yield the pack to Him who bore it

for them "in His own body, on the tree." They are never "light and

gladsome" with a sense of great relief; and their Christian

progress is sadly impeded by the burden from which the central

truth of the Christian scheme releases them. If there be any such

thing as forgiveness, then there is such a thing as release; but I

think there are many subjects of free and full forgiveness who

insist on carrying their old, dirty packs to their graves,

staggering under them all the way.

But this is not what I started to write about. A great many men

carry their life as an author carries a book which he is writing--

never losing the sense of their burden. When a writer undertakes a

book, and feels the necessity of perfect continuity of thought and

symmetry of structure, he can never lay it wholly aside. When once

he has taken up the first chapter, and comprehended his materials

and machinery and end, he does not dare to lay down his work, or

diverge from the grand channel of his thought, until the last

chapter is finished. He can take no three months' vacation; he can

read no books that do not contribute to his progress in the chosen

direction; he can never wholly lay aside the burden that is on

him. It is like lifting upon one's shoulder the end of a long

pole, and then walking under it from end to end. The burden upon

the shoulder is not relieved until the whole length has been

passed, and it drops as we walk from under it. Such is the way

that many men, and, perhaps, most men, carry life. If their

business troubles them, they have no power to throw it off, and no

disposition to try to do it. They are entirely aware that they

gain nothing by carrying their tedious burden, but they carry it.

Not content with doing their duty, and trying their best while

actively engaged, they take home with them a long face, breathe

sighs around them in the saddest fashion, and really unfit

themselves for the healthy exercise of their reason, and the

active employment of their faculties.

With men of this stamp, it makes little difference whether they

are prosperous or otherwise. If times are good, and they really

have no fault to find with matters as they exist, they become

troubled about bad times that may possibly lie just ahead. "Oh,

it's all well enough to-day," they say, "but you can't tell what

is coming;" so they bind the burden of the future upon them, and

undertake to steal a march on God's providence. Such a thing as

doing the duty of a single day, and doing it well, and then

throwing off the burden of care, and having a good time in some

rational way, until the hour comes for the commencement of the

next day's duty, they are strangers to. They walk into their

houses with a cloud upon their faces. They have no words of cheer

for those whom they have left at home during the day. They are

moody and sullen and sad--absorbed by their troubled thoughts--

taking no interest in the schemes, and having no sympathy with the

trials, of their wives and children, and making no effort to

relieve themselves of their burdens. If they pray at all, they

practically pray like this: "Give us this day our daily bread, and

to-morrow, and next day, and the day after, and next year, and

fifty years to come; and lest Thou shouldst forget it, or neglect

to answer us, we have undertaken to look after the matter

ourselves."

To say nothing of the constant sadness, uneasiness, and discomfort

of such a life as this, to all those who lead it, and to all who

are intimately associated with them, the permanent effect of it

upon the character of its subjects is to make them selfish and

hard, and small and mean. Whatever may be their circumstances,

they become sensitive upon any expenditure of money for purposes

beyond the simplest necessities of personal and family life. This

result is both natural and inevitable. A man whose life, in and

out of his counting-room, is absorbed by business, ceases, at

last, to be any thing but a man of business; and his mind

contracts and hardens down to its central, motive idea. That which

becomes the dominant aim and the grand end of life, always

determines the character of life; and I have known young men, even

before they have approached middle age, to become mean and miserly

to such a degree as to disappoint and disgust their friends,

simply in consequence of a few years' absorption in business.

Business is not life, nor is it life's end. It is simply a means

of life; and all true living lies outside of it. Ministry is the

mission of business--ministry to necessity, to comfort, and to a

personal, family, and social life into which business never

enters, save with an unwelcome foot and a disturbing hand. This

everlasting hugging of the burden of business, is, therefore, not

only a painful task, but it is permanently damaging to all who

indulge in it.

"It is very easy to talk," says my friend, with a load upon his

shoulders, "but talking does not pay notes at the bank, and keep

creditors easy, and provide for one's family." Granted: and now

will you be kind enough to tell me how many notes you ever paid at

bank, and how much provision you ever made for your family by

"mugging" over your troubles out of business hours? If your retort

is good for any thing, mine is. You never accomplished one good

thing in your life by making yourself and others unhappy through

constant dwelling upon trouble when not engaged in active efforts

to extricate yourself from it. You never gained a single inch of

progress by dwelling upon miscarriages in business which you could

not avoid. All your absorption, all your sad reflection, all your

misgivings about the future, all your care beyond the exercise of

your best ability in action, has not only been utterly useless,

but it has injured the comfort of all around you, destroyed the

peace of your life, cheated you out of the reward of your labor,

and made a smaller, harder, meaner man of you. If any good result

could be secured by carrying the burden of your business into all

your life, then there would be some apology for it; but you know

that no such result can be secured. "It is very easy to talk," my

friend persists in saying, "but one cannot always command one's

mind, in such a matter as this." Did you ever try? Have you ever

systematically tried to do this? Is it your regular aim, after you

have discharged the business of the day, to throw off care until

the next day's business is undertaken? No? Then how do you know

whether it is easy or not?

I believe it is in the power of every man, who has not too long

abused himself, to lay aside every night his pack of mental care

and anxiety, and enter into life. Not only this, but I believe

that it is absolutely essential to his business success that he do

this. A man who dwells constantly upon the dark side of his

affairs, and is troubled and gloomy in his apprehensions

concerning the future, becomes a weak and timid man--disqualified

in many essential respects for the work of his life. His mind

needs rest and revivification. Suppose an ass were to be treated

in the manner in which men treat themselves. Suppose the burden

which we place upon him during the day were kept lashed to his

back at night, so that he must bear it, either standing or lying,

off duty as well as on. How long would he be worth any thing for

labor? The illustration is apposite in every particular. If the

mind is to be kept fit for business, it is at regular periods to

be kept out of business. A great multitude of business failures

are attributable, I have no doubt, to the debilitating and

damaging effect of carrying the burdens of business between

business hours. Men become in a measure sick and insane by

dwelling upon their affairs, when they should be receiving rest

and refreshment.

Again, men who insist upon keeping their packs upon their

shoulders, practically deny the existence of the providence of a

Being superior to themselves, and dominant in all human affairs.

If I were to say to one of these men: "you do not believe in

Providence at all," he would accuse me of a harsh judgment, and

feel injured by it; but it is certainly legitimate for me to ask

him what evidence he gives of his belief. All, indeed, profess to

believe in Providence, in a certain general way. The popular idea

is very foggy upon the matter. We somehow imagine that God knows

every thing in general and nothing in particular--that He takes

interest in, supervision of, and controlling influence over,

matters at large, with an imperial disregard of details--that He

moulds with a majestic hand the character and destiny of nations,

but never condescends to meddle with the small and insignificant

affairs of individuals. Providence, in this view, would seem to be

very much like certain tongs used in a blacksmith's shop, whose

jaws do not wholly close--convenient for handling large pieces of

iron, but incapable of grasping a nail. Or, Providence is like a

great general, who only directs the movements of large bodies of

men, deals only with the officers, and never thinks of so small a

thing as looking after the blanket of a private soldier, or

dressing a wounded finger.

It is very easy to perceive that such a Providence as this has no

practical value in every-day, individual life. Very evidently it

is not that Providence which numbers the hairs of men's heads, and

without whose notice not a sparrow falls to the ground. One is a

Providence made by men who undertake to measure God by themselves;

the other is the Providence revealed in the Bible. God exercises a

special providence, which reaches to the minutest affairs of the

most insignificant man, or we are all in a condition of essential

orphanage. A special Providence denied, and prayer becomes a

mockery, devotion a deceit, and the sense of individual

responsibility slavery to a superstitious idea. Now I do not

pretend to address myself to men who do not believe in prayer. I

know men well enough to know that there are very few of them who

do not believe in prayer, and that there are very few of them who

do not, particularly in moments of danger, pray. Deep down under

the thickest crusts of depravity there lies the conviction, always

ready to rise in painful emergencies, that God takes cognizance of

every man, and is able to help him. Smooth away the idea of

Providence as we may, into an unmeaning generality, the time

comes, in every man's life, when he recognizes the fact that God

is dealing with him; and he may as well recognize the fact all the

time as when he is driven to feel that he has no help in himself.

So, if there be a special Providence, it is a Providence to be

trusted; and the man who believes in it has no apology for

carrying a single unnecessary burden. This providence in all human

affairs, is like the principle of vitality in the vegetable world.

It does not release us from effort, in every legitimate and

needful way, for the accomplishment of our laudable purposes; but

when our efforts are complete, it takes care of the rest. What

should we think of the farmer who could never roll the burden of

his cornfield from his mind, and who, after hoeing his ground

repeatedly, and cutting or covering every weed, should go night

after night and sit up with it, and think of it, and dream of it

all the while? He has done all there is for him to do, and beyond

this he cannot control an hour of sunshine, a drop of dew, or a

single cloud-full of rain. He cannot influence the law of growth

in any particular. His field is in the control of a power entirely

above and beyond him; and every thought he gives to it, after

having done what he can for its prosperity, is utterly useless. It

is his business to trust. Having done what he can, the remainder

is in the hands of Him who feeds the springs of being with light

and heat and moisture. It is thus that man's affairs grow while he

sleeps. The hand that ministers to every plant will not fail to

minister to him for whose use the plant was made.

Why do not men trust in Providence? Simply because, in their usual

moods and in their usual circumstances, they do not believe in it.

There is no other explanation. You, my friend, who carry your

burdens around on your shoulders all the time, and who, perhaps,

pray every morning and every night, do not believe in Providence.

You do not feel that you can trust Providence. You assent to all

that I say upon the subject, but, after all, your belief in

Providence has no genuine vitality. You do not believe in it as

you believe in the purity of your wife or the honor of your

friend. You do not rely upon it for an hour. You do nod your head

and say--"yes, yes;" and you think you are sincere; but you

deceive yourself. So long as you persist in carrying your pack,

which is a very unpleasant burden, as you know, you do not believe

in Providence; else you would trust in it. You are tired and

harassed by your daily labor; and it is very natural to suppose

that if you could remove your burden each evening, and place it in

the charge of one whom you believe would take care of it, you

would do it with gladness. You fail to do it, and what is the

natural conclusion? It is that your belief in Providence is a

humbug. You believe in the honor of your friend, and you trust it.

You believe in the honesty and ability of your creditor, and you

trust him. You trust every thing and everybody that you firmly

believe in; and the only reason under heaven why you do not roll

off the burden that oppresses you, every day and every hour of

your life, and commit it to the care of Providence, is, that you

do not believe in Providence.

We are in the habit of talking about the world as a world of care,

and speaking of human life as inseparably accompanied by trouble.

This is, indeed, the truth; but if we were to remove from the

world all its useless care, and take from life all its unnecessary

trouble, they would be transformed into such bright and pleasant

things that we should hardly know them. I know very few men and

women who do not bear about with them care and trouble which God

never put upon them, and which He has no desire to see upon their

shoulders. It does not belong to them. It relates to things that

are in the realm of Providence alone, or to things over which they

have no control. The future is God's, but they voluntarily take it

upon their shoulders, and try to bear it. They pluck a section of

God's eternity out of His hands, and groan with the burden. They

assume care which is not their own--which belongs to the

Controller of their lives, and the Governor of the universe. It is

care for that which is beyond human care--anxiety for that which

anxiety cannot reach--trouble about that which we can neither

make nor mend--that oppresses humanity. We can bear our daily

burdens very well. We can go through our regular hours of bodily

and mental labor, and feel the better rather than the worse for

it; but to care for that which our care cannot touch, and to be

troubled about that which is entirely beyond our sphere--this is

the burden that breaks the back of the world--this is the burden

which we bind to our shoulders with obstinate fatuity.

LESSON XXI.

PROPER PEOPLE AND PERFECT PEOPLE.

"I must have liberty

Withal, as large a charter as the wind

To blow on whom I please." SHAKSPEARE.

"They say best men are moulded out of faults."

THE SAME.

"There's no such thing in nature, and you'll draw

A faultless monster which the world ne'er saw."

SHEFFIELD.

Nature calls for room and for freedom--room for her ocean and

freedom for its waves; room for her rivers and freedom for their

flowing; room for her forests and freedom for every tree to

respond to the influences of earth and sky according to its law.

Exceedingly proper things are not at all in the line of nature.

Nature never trims a hedge, or cuts off the tail of a horse.

Nature never compels a brook to flow in a right line, but permits

it to make just as many turns in a meadow as it pleases. Nature is

very careless about the form of her clouds, and masses and colors

them with great disregard of the opinions of the painters. Nature

never thinks of smoothing off her rocks, and cleaning away her

mud, and keeping herself trim and neat. She does very improper

things in a very impulsive manner. Instead of contriving some

safe, silent, and secret way to dispose of her electricity, she

comes out with a blinding flash and a stunning crash, and a rush

of rain that very likely fills the mountain streams to overflowing,

and destroys bridges and booms, and cabins and cornfields.

On the whole, though nature keeps up a respectable appearance,

I suppose that, in the opinion of my particular friend Miss Nancy,

she would be improved by taking a few lessons of a French gardener,

and reading savage criticisms on Ruskin.

I have alluded to my particular friend Miss Nancy. Perhaps I ought

to say, at starting, that Miss Nancy is a man, and that I use the

name bestowed upon him by his enemies, because it is, in a very

important sense, descriptive. Miss Nancy's boots are faithfully

polished twice a day. His linen is immaculate; and the tie of his

cravat is square and faultless. He never makes a mistake in

grammar while engaged in conversation. He is versed in all the

forms and usages of society, and particularly at home in gallant

attention to what he calls "the ladies." He seems to have lost

every rough corner, if he ever had one. In politics and religion,

he is just as proper as in social life. The most respectable

religion is his religion; and the politics that shun extremes are

his politics. I think he is what they call a conservative. At any

rate, I newer knew him to do a rash or impulsive thing, or speak

an improper word in his life. I think he is as nearly perfect as

any man I ever saw.

But, after all, Miss Nancy is not a popular man. He will probably

live and die an old bachelor, because all the women will persist

in laughing at him. He is certainly good-looking, his dress is

unexceptionable, his manners are "as good as they make them,"

and his morals are as proper as his manners; yet I have not yet seen

the woman who would speak a pleasant word of my friend. He is

decidedly a "woman's man," yet no woman will own him, and no

woman feels comfortable with him. His language is so carefully

guarded against all impropriety of style and structure, that she

feels as if he were criticizing every word she utters, as well as

measuring his own. His manners are so very proper that they are

formal and constrained, and make her uncomfortable. His sentiments

and opinions are so very conservative, that they have no vitality in

them. With a curious perverseness, the most gentle and accomplished

women will turn from him with a sense of relief, to join in the society

of a hearty fellow with a loud laugh and a dash of slang, and a free

and easy way with him. It may be difficult to explain all this, but

it is true. An exceedingly proper man is never a popular man. That

life which is controlled by rigid and unvarying rules, and regulated

by conventionalities in every minute particular, and restrained in

every impulse by notions of propriety, is unlovely and unnatural,

and can never he otherwise.

The instincts of men are always right in this and all cognate

matters. All formalism is offensive to good taste. The painter

does not study landscape in a garden. Formal isles, closely-trimmed

trees, rose hushes on the top of tall sticks, flowers tied to

supports, vines trained upon trellises, lakes with clipped and

pebbled margins and India-rubber swans--these are not picturesque.

There is no more inspiration in them than there would be in a row

of tenement houses in the city. The painter looks for beauty out

where nature reigns undisturbed amid her imperfections,--where the

aisles are made by the deer going to his lick; where the trees are

never trimmed save by the lightning or the hurricane; where the

rose-bushes spread their branches and the vines trail themselves

at liberty; and where the lake looks up into the faces of trees

centuries old, and hems itself in with thickets of alders and

green reaches of flags and rushes, and throbs to the touch of the

mountain breeze, while on its bosom

"The black duck, with her glossy breast

Sits swinging silently."

A little child whose head is piled with laces and ribbons,

whose dress is a mass of embroidery, and who is booted and gloved

and otherwise oppressed by parental vanity and extravagance, is

not picturesque, any further than its face goes. The portrait

painter will cling to the face and let the clothes alone. All

this I trickery of art, brought into comparison or contrast with

the simple beauty of nature, is offensive. Yet a little beggar

boy, with an old straw hat on, and with bare, brown feet, and a

burnt shoulder which his torn shirt refuses to cover, would be a

painter's joy. Here would be drapery that he would delight to

paint, simply because there would be no formality about it. It is

impossible for us to know how ridiculous a dress-coat is until we

see it in a statue. We are obliged to put all our modern sages and

heroes into togas and blankets and long cloaks in order to make

them presentable to posterity.

We never find groups of accordant, striking facts like these--and

their number could be largely increased--without finding that they

are all strung together by an important law. All life demands room

and freedom--freedom to manifest itself in every way, according to

the law of its being and the range of its circumstances. All life

is individual and characteristic, and comes reluctantly under the

sway of outside forces. It is not natural to be proper, or to love

propriety. In saying this I simply mean that it is against nature to

bring one's individuality under the curbing and controlling hands

of others--to make the notions of the world the law and limit of

one's liberty, and to square every word and every act by arbitrary

rules imposed by cliques and customs. A man who has been

clipped in all his puttings-forth, and modelled by outside hands

and outside influences, until it is apparent that he is governed

from without rather than from within, is just as unnatural an object

as a tree that has been clipped and tied and bent until its top has

grown into the form of a cube. Thus the reason why Miss Nancy

is not popular, and why the women refuse to delight in him, is,

that he is not his own master--that he has, in himself, no independent

life. It is not proper that he give utterance to his impulses;--so

he suppresses them. It is not proper that he frankly reveal the

emotions of his heart; so he conceals them. It is not proper that

he enter enthusiastically into any work or any pleasure; so he is

a constant check to the enthusiasm of others. It is not proper

that he speak the words that spring to his lips when his weak

sensibilities are touched; so he studies his language, and shapes

his phrases to the accepted models. Thus is he shortened in on

every side, until his individuality is all gone, and the humanity

in him becomes as characterless as its expression. Every utterance

of his life is made with a well-measured reference to certain

standards to which he is an acknowledged slave.

Lessons in Life; A Series of Familiar Essays · 第 15 / 18 段