There is a fine ring to this familiar quatrain of Mr. Longfellow,

but it is nothing more than a musical cheat. It sounds like truth,

but it is a lie. The lives of great men all remind us that they

have made their own memory sublime, but they do not assure us at

all that we can leave footprints like theirs behind us. If you do

not believe it, go to the cemetery yonder. There they lie--ten

thousand upturned faces--ten thousand breathless bosoms. There was

a time when fire flashed in those vacant orbits, and warm

ambitions pulsed in those bosoms. Dreams of fame and power once

haunted those hollows skulls. Those little piles of bones that

once were feet ran swiftly and determinedly through forty, fifty,

sixty, seventy years of life; but where are the prints they left?

"He lived--he died--he was buried"--is all that the headstone

tells us. We move among the monuments, we see the sculpture, but

no voice comes to us to say that the sleepers are remembered for

any thing they ever did. Natural affection pays its tribute to its

departed object, a generation passes by, the stone grows gray, and

the man has ceased to be, and is to the world as if he had never

lived. Why is it that no more have left a name behind them? Simply

because they were not endowed by their Maker with the power to do

it, and because the offices of life are mainly humble, requiring

only humble powers for their fulfilment. The cemeteries of one

hundred years hence will be like those of to-day. Of all those now

in the schools of this country, dreaming of fame, not one in

twenty thousand will be heard of then,--not one in twenty thousand

will have left a footprint behind him.

Now I believe that a school, in order to be a good one, should be

one that will fit men and women, in the best way, for the humble

positions that the great mass of them must necessarily occupy in

life. It is not necessary that boys and girls be taught any less

than they are taught now. They should receive more practical

knowledge than they do now, without a doubt, and less of that

which is simply ornamental, but they cannot know too much. An

intelligent gardener is better than a clod-hopper, and an educated

nurse is better than an ignorant one; but if the gardener and the

nurse have been spoiled for their business and their condition, by

the sentiments which they have imbibed with their knowledge, they

are made uncomfortable to themselves, and to those whom they

serve. I do not care how much knowledge a man may have acquired in

school, that school has been a curse to him if its influence has

been to make him unhappy in his place, and to fill him with futile

ambitions.

The country has great reason to lament the effect of the kind of

instruction upon which I have remarked. The universal greed for

office is nothing but an indication of the appetite for

distinction which has been diligently fed from childhood. It is

astonishing to see the rush for office on the occasion of the

change of a State or National Administration. Men will leave quiet

and remunerative employments, and subject themselves to mean

humiliations, simply to get their names into a newspaper, and to

achieve a little official importance and social distinction. This

desire for distinction seems to run through the whole social body,

as a kind of moral scrofula, developing itself in various ways,

according to circumstances and peculiarities of constitution. The

consequence is that politics have become the pursuit of small men,

and we no longer have an opportunity to put the best men into

office. The scramble for place among fools is so great and so

successful, that men of dignity and modesty retire from the field

in disgust. Everybody wants to "be something," and in order to be

something, everybody must leave his proper place in the world, and

assume a position which God never intended he should fill. Look in

upon a State legislature once, and you will find sufficient

illustration of my meaning. Not one man in five of the whole

number possesses the first qualification for making the laws of a

State, and half of them never read the constitution of the

country. I mean no contempt for the good, honest men of whom our

State legislatures are principally composed, but I wish simply to

say that there is nothing in their quality of mind, habits of

thought, intellectual power, or style of pursuits that fits them

for the great and momentous functions of legislation. They are

there, a set of "nobodies," mainly for the purpose of becoming

"somebodies," and not for any object connected with the good of

the State.

Somehow, all the students in all our schools get the idea, that a

man in order to be "somebody" must be in public life. Now think of

the fact that the millions attending school in this country have

in some way acquired this idea, and that only one in every one

thousand of these is either needed in public life, or can win

success there. Let this fact be realized, and it is easy to see

that the nine hundred and ninety-nine will feel that they are

somehow cheated out of their birthright. They desired to be in

public life, and be "somebody," but they are not, and so their

life grows tame and tasteless to them. They are disappointed. The

men solace themselves with a petty justice's commission, or a town

office of some kind, and the women--some of them--talk about

"woman's rights," and make themselves notorious and ridiculous at

public meetings. I think women have rights which they do not at

present enjoy, but I have very little confidence in the motives of

their petticoated champions, who court mobs, delight in notoriety,

and glory in their opportunity to burst away from private life,

and be recognized by the public as "somebodies." I insist on

this:--that private and even obscure life is the normal condition

of the great multitude of men and women in this world; and that,

to serve this private life, public life is instituted. Public life

has no legitimate significance save I as it is related to the

service of private life. It requires peculiar talents and peculiar

education, and brings with it peculiar trials; and the man best

fitted for it would be the last man confidently to assert his fitness

for it.

Thousands seek to become "somebodies" through the avenues of

professional life; and so professional life is full of "nobodies."

The pulpit is crowded with goodish "nobodies"--men who have no

power--no unction--no mission. They strain their brains to write

common-places, and wear themselves out repeating the rant of their

sect and the cant of their schools. The bar is cursed with

"nobodies" as much as the pulpit. The lawyers are few; the

pettifoggers are many. The bar, more than any other medium, is

that through which the ambitious youth of the country seek to

attain political eminence. Thousands go into the study of law, not

so much for the sake of the profession, as for the sake of the

advantages it is supposed to give them for political preferment.

An ambitious boy who has taken it into his head to be "somebody,"

always studies law; and as soon as he is "admitted to the bar" he

is ready to begin his political scheming. Multitudes of lawyers

are a disgrace to their profession, and a curse to their country.

They lack the brains necessary to make them respectable, and the

morals requisite for good neighborhood. They live on quarrels, and

breed them that they may live. They have spoiled themselves for

private life, and they spoil the private life around them. As for

the medical profession, I tremble to think how many enter it

because they have neither piety enough for preaching, nor brains

enough to practice law. When I think of the great army of little

men that is yearly commissioned to go forth into the world with a

case of sharp knives in one hand, and a magazine of drugs in the

other, I heave a sigh for the human race. Especially is all this

lamentable when we remember that it involves the spoiling of

thousands of good farmers and mechanics, to make poor professional

men, while those who would make good professional men are obliged

to attend to the simple duties of life, and submit to preaching

that neither feeds nor stimulates them, and medicine that kills or

fails to cure them.

There must be something radically wrong in our educational system,

when youth are generally unfitted for the station which they are

to occupy, or are forced into professions for which they have no

natural fitness. The truth is that the stuff talked to boys and

girls alike, about "aiming high," and the assurances given them,

indiscriminately, that they can be any thing that they choose to

become, are essential nuisances. Our children all go to the public

schools. They are all taught these things. They all go out into

the world with high notions, and find it impossible to content

themselves with their lot. They had hoped to realize in life that

which had been promised them in school, but all their dreams have

faded, and left them disappointed and unhappy. They envy those

whom they have been taught to consider above them, and learn to

count their own lives a failure. Girls starve in a mean poverty,

or do worse, because they are too proud to work in a chamber, or

go into a shop. American servants are obsolete, all common

employments are at a discount, the professions are crowded to

overflowing, the country throngs with demagogues, and a general

discontent with a humble lot prevails, simply because the youth of

America have had the idea drilled into them that to be in private

life, in whatever condition, is to be, in some sense, a "nobody."

It is possible that the schools are not exclusively to blame for

this state of things, and that our political harangues, and even

our political institutions, have something to do with it.

What we greatly need in this country is the inculcation of soberer

views of life. Boys and girls are bred to discontent. Everybody is

after a high place, and nearly everybody fails to get one; and,

failing, loses heart, temper, and content. The multitude dress

beyond their means, and live beyond their necessities, to keep up

a show of being what they are not. Farmers' daughters do not love

to become farmers' wives, and even their fathers and mothers

stimulate their ambition to exchange their station for one which

stands higher in the world's estimation. Humble employments are

held in contempt, and humble powers are everywhere making high

employments contemptible. Our children need to be educated to

fill, in Christian humility, the subordinate offices of life which

they must fill, and taught to respect humble callings, and to

beautify and glorify them by lives of contented and glad industry.

When public schools accomplish an end so desirable as this, they

will fulfil their mission, and they will not before. I seriously

doubt whether one school in a hundred, public or private,

comprehends its duty in this particular. They fail to inculcate

the idea that the majority of the offices of life are humble, that

the powers of the majority of the youth which they contain have

relation to those offices, that no man is respectable when he is

out of his place, and that half of the unhappiness of the world

grows out of the fact, that, from distorted views of life, men are

in places where they do not belong. Let us have this thing

altogether reformed.

LESSON IX.

PERVERSENESS.

"Because she's constant, he will change.

And kindest glances coldly meet,

And all the time he seems so strange,

His soul is fawning at her feet."

COVENTRY PATMORE.

"All that we seem to think of is to manage matters so as to do as

little good and plague and disappoint as many people as possible."

--HAZLITT.

It seems to me, either that there is a great deal of human nature

in a pig, or that there is a great deal of pig in human nature. I

find myself always sympathizing with a pig that wishes to go in an

opposite direction to that in which its owner would drive it. It

would be a sufficient reason for me to desire to go eastward, that

a man was behind me, with an oath in his mouth and a very heavy

boot on his foot, endeavoring to drive me westward. We are jealous

of our freedom. We naturally rise in opposition to a will that

undertakes to command our movements. This is not the result of

education at all; it is pure human nature. Command a child--who

shall be only old enough to understand you--to refrain from some

special act, and you excite in his heart a desire to do that act;

and he will have, nine times in ten, no reason for his desire to

do it but your command that he shall not. The youngest human soul

that has a will at all, takes the first occasion to declare its

independence.

Now, I believe this principle in human nature to be, in itself,

good. It is that which declares a man's right to himself--that

which asserts personal liberty in thought, will, and movement. I

believe it existed in Adam and Eve, and that it is more than

likely that the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was

despoiled because our beautiful great-grandmother, (for whom I

confess much sympathy and affection,) was forbidden to touch it.

It is a principle which should always be carefully distinguished

from perverseness, in all our dealings with young and old, and in

all our estimates of human character. When a child obeys a man, or

when one man obeys another, it should always be for good and

sufficient reason. Neither child nor man should be expected to

surrender his right to himself without the presentation to him of

the proper motive. When, yielding to this motive, the soul

consents to be directed or led, it becomes obedient. Compulsion

may secure conformity, but never obedience. If I, as a child or

man, am to yield myself to the direction of any other man, that

man is bound to present to me an adequate motive for the

surrender. God throws upon me personal responsibility--gives me to

myself--and no man, parent or otherwise, can make me truly

obedient without giving me the motive for obedience. When a child

or a man fails to yield to the legitimate motives of obedience, he

is perverse, and it is about perverseness in some of its forms of

manifestation that I propose to talk in this article.

At starting, I must give perverseness a somewhat broader meaning

than that thus far indicated. I will say that that person is

perverse who, from vanity, or pride of opinion and will, or

malice, or any mean consideration, refuses to yield his conduct

and himself to those motives and influences which his reason and

conscience recognize to be pure and good and true. In its least

aggravated form, perhaps, we find it among lovers. Women will

sometimes persistently ignore a passion which they know has taken

full possession of them, and grieve the heart that loves them by a

coldness and indifference which they do not feel at all. Rather

than acknowledge their affection for one whose loss would kill

them, or, what would be the same thing, kill the world for them,

they have lied, grown sick, and gone nearly insane. This is a

perverseness very uncommon. Sometimes lovers have been very tender

and devoted so long as a doubt of ultimate mutual possession

remained to give zest to their passion, but the moment this doubt

has been removed, one or the other has become incomprehensibly

indifferent.

I have noticed that very few married pairs are matches in the

matter of warmth and expression of passion between the parties.

The man will be all devotion and tenderness--brimming with

expressions of affection and exhibitions of fondness, and the

woman all coolness and passivity, or (which is much more common)

the woman will be active in expression, lavishing caresses and

tendernesses upon a man who very possibly grows harder and colder

with every delicate proof that the whole wealth of his wife's

nature is poured at his feet, as a libation upon an altar. It is

here that we see some of the strangest cases of perverseness that

it is possible to conceive. I know men who are not bad men--who,

I suppose, really love and respect their wives--and who would deny

themselves even to heroism to give them the comforts and luxuries

of life, yet who find themselves moved to reject with poorly-covered

scorn, and almost to resent, the varied expressions of affection to

which those wives give utterance. I know wives who long to pour

their hearts into the hearts of their husbands, and to get sympathetic

and fitting response, but who are never allowed to do it. They live

a constrained, suppressed, unsatisfied life. They absolutely pine

for the privilege of saying freely what they feel, in all love's varied

languages, toward men who love them, but who grow harder with

every approach of tenderness and colder with every warm, invading

breath. A shower that purifies the atmosphere, and refreshes the

face of heaven itself, sours cream, just as love's sweetest expression

sours these men.

I have known wives to walk through such an experience as this into

a condition of abject slavery--to waste their affection without

return, until they have become poor, and spiritless, and mean. I

have known them to lose their will--to become the mere dependent

mistresses of their husbands--to be creeping cravens in dwellings

where it should be their privilege to move as radiant queens. I

have known them thrown back upon themselves, until they have

become bitter railers against their husbands--uncomfortable

companions--openly and shamelessly flouting their affection. I do

not know what to make of the perverseness which induces a man to

repel the advances of a heart which worships him, and to become

hard and tyrannical in the degree by which that heart seeks to

express its affection for him. There are husbands who would take

the declaration that they do not love their wives as an insult,

yet who hold the woman who loves them in fear and restraint

through their whole life. I know wives who move about their houses

with a trembling regard to the moods and notions of their

husbands--wives who have no more liberty than slaves, who never

spend a cent of money without a feeling of guilt, and who never

give an order about the house without the same doubt of their

authority that they would have if they were only housekeepers,

employed at a very economical salary. I can think of no proper

punishment for such husbands except daily ducking in a horse-pond,

until reformation. Yet these asses are so unconscious of their

detestable habits of feeling and life, that, probably, not one of

them who reads this will think that I mean him, but will wonder

where I have lived to fall in with such outlandish people.

The most precious possession that ever comes to a man in this

world is a woman's heart. Why some graceful and most amiable women

whom I know will persist in loving some men whom I also know, is

more than I know. I will not call their love an exhibition of

perverseness, though it looks like it; but that these men with

these rich, sweet hearts in their hands, grow sour and snappish,

and surly and tyrannical and exacting, is the most unaccountable

thing in the world. If a pig will not allow himself to be driven,

he will follow a man who offers him corn, and he will eat the

corn, even though he puts his feet in the trough; but there are

men--some of them of Christian professions--who take every

tenderness their wives bring them, and every expression of

affection, and every service, and every yearning sympathy, and

trample them under feet without tasting them, and without a look

of gratitude in their eyes. Hard, cold, thin-blooded, white-livered,

contemptible curmudgeons--they think their wives weak and

foolish, and themselves wise and dignified! I beg my readers to

assist me in despising them. I do not feel adequate to the task of

doing them justice.

There is another exhibition of perverseness which we sometimes see

in families. There will be, perhaps, from two to half a dozen

sisters in a family, amiable all of them. Now, think of the

reasons which should bind them together in the tenderest sympathy.

They were born of the same mother, they were nursed at the same

heart, they were cradled under the same roof by the same hand,

they have knelt at the side of the same father, their interests,

trials, associates, standing--every thing concerning their family

and social life--are the same. The honor of one intimately

concerns the honor of the other, yet I have known such families of

sisters fly apart the moment they became in any way independent of

each other, as if they were natural enemies. I have seen them take

the part of a friend against any member of the family band, and

become disgusted with one another's society. Where matters have

not gone to this length, I have seen sisters who would never

caress each other, or, by any but the most formal and dignified

methods, express their affection for each other. I have seen them

live together for months and years as inexpressive of affection

for each other as cattle in a stall,--more so: for I have seen a

cow affectionately lick her neighbor's ear by the half-hour, while

among these girls I have failed to see a kiss, or hear a tender

word, or witness any exhibition of sisterly affection whatever.

One of the most common forms of perverseness, though one of the

most subtle and least known, is that shown by people who study to

shut everybody out from a knowledge of their nature and their

life. They make it their grand end and aim to appear to be exactly

what they are not, to appear to believe exactly what they do not

believe, and to appear to feel what they do not feel at all. This

is not because they are ashamed of themselves, or because they

really have any thing to conceal. They have simply taken on this

form of perverseness. They will not, if they can help it, allow

any man to get inside of their natures and characters. If they

write you a letter, they will mislead you. They will say to you

irreverent and shocking things, to prove to you that they are

bold, and unfeeling, and unthoughtful, when they tremble at what

they have written, and really show by their language that they are

afraid, and full of feeling, and very thoughtful. If they have a

sentiment of love for anybody, they take it as a dog would a bone,

and go and dig a hole in the ground and bury it, only resorting to

it in the dark, for private crunching. Very likely they will try

to make you believe that they live a most dainty and delicate life

--that the animals of the field, and the fowls of the air love

them, and come at their call--that clouds arrange themselves in

heaven for their benefit, and are sufficiently paid for the effort

by their admiration--that flowers excite them to frenzy--a very

fine frenzy, indeed--and that all sounds shape themselves to music

in their souls. They would have you think that they live a kind of

charmed life--that the sun woos them, and the moon pines for them,

and the sea sobs because they will not come, and the daisies wait

lovingly for their feet, yet, if you knew the truth, you would see

that they sit discontentedly among the homeliest surroundings of

domestic life, with their sleeves rolled up--confound them!

This variety of perverseness seems very inexplicable. I have seen

much of it, but do not know what to make of it. There is doubtless

something morbid in it. It is often carried to such extremes, and

managed so artfully, that multitudes are deceived by it. I know

of some very beautiful natures that pass in the world for rough

and coarse. I know men who have the reputation of being hard and

harsh, yet who are, inside, and in their own consciousness, as

gentle and sensitive as women--who put on a stern air and a

repellent manner, when they are really yearning for sympathy. I

have seen this air and manner broken through and battered down by

a friendly man, who found what he suspected behind it--a generous,

warm, noble heart. This perverseness seems to be akin to that of

the miser who knows he is rich, takes his highest delight in being

rich, and yet dresses meanly, and fares like a beggar rather than

be thought rich. Women hide themselves more than men. They are

generally more sensitive, and their life and circumscribed habits

have a tendency to the formation of morbid moods, and this among

the number.

Of the perverseness of partisanship in politics much is written, and

my pen need not dip into it; but there is a perverseness exhibited by

Christian churches in their quarrels that should be exposed and

discussed, because some people have an impression that it may

possibly be piety. "For _dum squizzle_, read _permanence_,"

said an editor, correcting a typographical error that had found its

way into his journal. It seems as strange that perverseness should

be mistaken for piety, as that "permanence" should be mistaken for

"dum squizzle," but I believe it often is. Let some little cause of

disturbance arise, and become active in a church, and it is astonishing

how both parties go to work and pray over it. The pastor, perhaps,

has said something on the subject of slavery, or he does not preach

doctrine enough, or he preaches the wrong sort of doctrine, or he

does not visit his people enough, or there is "a row" about the

singing, or about a change in the hymn-books, or about repairing

the church, or buying an organ, or something or other, and

straightway sides are taken, and the wills of both parties get

roused. It is sometimes laughable--it would always be, only that

it is too sad--to see how quickly both parties grow pious, as they

grow perverse. It would seem, as the strife waxes hot, that the

glory of God was never so much in their hearts as now. They pray

with fervor, they are constant in their public religious duties,

they pass through the most scrupulous self-examinations, and then

fight on to the bitter end; believing, I suppose, that they are

really doing God service, when they are only gratifying their own

perverse wills.

Lessons in Life; A Series of Familiar Essays · 第 6 / 18 段