LECTURE I.

Objects of the Lectures.--Lectures based upon principle and not upon

grounds of expediency.--Lecturer's knowledge of the Opium question derived

from actual acquaintance with the facts, acquired during nearly fifteen

years' residence in Hong Kong.--Opium smoking as practised by the Chinese

perfectly innocuous, beneficial rather than injurious.--Opinion of Dr.

Ayres.--Charges made by the Anti-Opium Society and its supporters false

and unfounded.--Alleged knowledge of the members and supporters of the

Anti-Opium Society founded on hearsay evidence of the worst and most

untrustworthy character.--Lecturer not acting in the interests of the

British merchants in China, nor of any other party or person.--Has no

personal interest in the Opium question, and is actuated only by a desire

to dispel the false and mischievous delusions spread abroad in England by

the Anti-Opium Society.--British and other foreign residents in China hold

opposite views to those disseminated by the Anti-Opium people.--British

merchants as a body have no interest in the trade.--China a great Empire

as large as Europe, with a much greater population.--Country and people of

China described.--Impossible to demoralize and debase such a people.--Opium

smoking a general custom throughout the eighteen provinces of China.--

Reasons for the prolonged existence of the Anti-Opium Society.--False

charges of the Anti-Opium Society respecting the Indo-China Opium trade

more fully formulated.--Petition to the House of Commons of the Protestant

Missionaries at Peking.--Refusal to sign it of the Rev. F. Galpin.--If

half those charges were true the British residents in China would be the

first to raise their voices against the Opium trade.--Official Yellow

Book published by Sir Robert Hart, the Inspector-General of Chinese

Customs, negatives the allegations of the members of the Anti-Opium

Society and the Protestant Missionaries.--Roman Catholic Missionaries make

no complaint against the Indo-China Opium trade.--Allegations of the

Anti-Opium Society that British trade with China has suffered from the

alleged forcing of Opium upon China untrue.--Friendly relations between

the British merchants in China and the Chinese people.--Englishmen more

esteemed by the Chinese than any other nation.--Hong Kong described.--

Government of China described.--Hong Kong the head-quarters of the

Indo-China Opium trade, Chinese residing there have better means of

procuring the drug than elsewhere--no sufferers from Opium smoking found

there.--Exposure by Dr. Ayres, the Colonial Surgeon of Hong Kong, of the

fallacy that Opium smoking, although indulged in for years, cannot be

dropped without injury to the system.--Fallacy of comparing the Chinese

with the savages of Central Africa by the Secretary of the Anti-Opium

Society exposed.--Archdeacon Gray, a resident for twenty years at Canton,

silent, in his recent work on China and her people, as to the alleged

iniquity of the Indo-China Opium trade.--Character of the Chinese as

described by various authors.--Chinese a frugal and abstemious people.--

Opium smoking less injurious than beer or tobacco.--Charges of the

Anti-Opium Society based upon fallacies; those fallacies detailed.--

Alleged objections of the Chinese to receive the Gospel on account of the

Indo-China Opium trade the merest subterfuge, and utterly absurd and

untenable.--The opinion of the late John Crawfurd, Esq., F.R.S., formerly

Governor of the Straits Settlements.--His Dictionary of the Indian Islands

and Adjacent countries.

The truth about opium · 第 6 / 27 题