=Bush-Tit= (_Psaltriparus minimus_ and races. Fig. 1). The Bush-Tits of

this group may be known by their brownish crown. The male and female are

alike in color; the young bird closely resembles them but has the crown

somewhat darker, and the winter plumage differs from that worn in summer

only in being slightly deeper in tone. Three races of this species are

known: The Bush-Tit (_P. m. minimus_) of the Pacific coast from northern

Lower California to Washington, in which the crown is sooty brown; the

California Bush-Tit (_P. m. californicus_), which occupies the interior

of California and Oregon, and has the crown much brighter than in the

coast form; and Grinda's Bush-Tit (_P. m. grindae_), a form of the Cape

Region of Lower California with a grayer back.

=Lead-colored Bush-Tit= (_Psaltriparus plumbeus._ Fig. 2). The gray

crown, of the same color as the back distinguishes this species from the

Bush-Tits living west of the Sierras. The male and the female are alike

in color; the young is essentially like them, but has less brownish on

the sides of the head, and there are no seasonal changes in color.

=Lloyd's Bush-Tit= (_Psaltriparus melanotis lloydi._ Figs. 3, 4).

Lloyd's Bush-Tit is a northern form of the Black-eared Bush-Tit of the

Mexican tableland. Occurring over our border only in western Texas,

southern New Mexico, and southern Arizona, it is rarely observed by the

field ornithologist. The adult male may always be known by its black

cheeks; and when the female has any black on the sides of the head (as

in Fig. 4), no difficulty is experienced in identifying her. But

immature males and often some apparently adult females are without

black, and they then so closely resemble the Lead-colored Bush-Tit that

it is impossible to distinguish them by color alone.

=Verdin= (_Auriparus flaviceps._ Fig. 5). When it leaves the nest, the

young Verdin is a gray bird with no yellow on its head or chestnut on

its wing-coverts, but at the postjuvenal molt both yellow head and

chestnut patch are acquired, and the bird, now in its first winter

plumage, cannot be distinguished from its parents. These closely

resemble each other, but the female sometimes has less yellow on the

head. After the colors of maturity are acquired, they are retained, and

thereafter there is essentially no change in the Verdin's appearance

throughout the year.

There are but two races of the Verdin. One (_A. f. flaviceps_) occupies

our Mexican border from coast to coast. The other, the Cape Verdin (_A.

f. lamprocephalus_), a smaller bird with a brighter yellow head, is

found only in the Cape Region of Lower California.

=Wren-Tit= (_Chamaea fasciata._ Fig. 6). The Wren-Tit enjoys the

distinction of being the only species in the only family of birds

peculiar to North America. It is restricted to the Pacific coast region

from northern Lower California north to Oregon. While it presents

practically no variation in color with age, sex, or season, it varies

considerably with locality, four races of it being recognized. Since

they are non-migratory, the purposes of field identification will best

be served by outlining their distribution as it is given in Dr.

Grinnell's recent, authoritative 'Distributional List of the Birds of

California' as follows:

=Pallid Wren-Tit= (_Chamaea fasciata henshawi_). Common resident of the

Upper Sonoran Zone west of the deserts and Great Basin drainage from the

Mexican line through the San Diegan district, northward coastwise to San

Luis Obispo and San Benito counties, and interiorly along the western

foothills of the Sierra Nevada to the lower McCloud River, in Shasta

County; also along the inner northern coast ranges from Helena, Trinity

County, and Scott River, Siskiyou County, south to Covelo, Mendocino

County, and Vacaville, Solano County. The easternmost stations for this

form are: vicinity of Walker Pass, Kern County, and Campo, San Diego

County.

=Intermediate Wren-Tit= (_Chamaea fasciata fasciata_). Common resident of

the coast region south of San Francisco Bay, from the Golden Gate to

southern Monterey County; east to include the Berkeley hills and at

least the west slopes of the Mount Hamilton range.

=Ruddy Wren-Tit= (_Chamaea fasciata rufula_). Common resident of the

humid coast belt immediately north of San Francisco Bay, in Marin,

Sonoma, and Mendocino counties. Northernmost station for this form:

Mendocino City.

=Coast Wren-Tit= (_Chamaea fasciata phaea_). Fairly common resident

locally in the extreme northern humid coast belt. Humboldt and Del Norte

Counties.

[Illustration (birds on branch)]

=Notes from Field and Study=

A Correction

Through a typographical error the Tree Sparrow was included in the

Census of Mrs. Herbert R. Mills of Tampa, Florida, published in the

January-February, 1916, issue of BIRD-LORE. The record should have read

Tree Swallow.--EDITOR.

Hints for Bird Clubs

The greatest problem with most of our bird clubs seems to be: What can

we do to make our meetings interesting, so that all the members,

especially the younger ones, will be anxious to come?

In planning for parties, picnics, or other entertainments of that sort,

we usually expect to have everyone present take a part in whatever games

or sports there are, and, no matter how often we have them, there is

never any question but that all who can do so will be there. I believe

that bird-club meetings can be made equally attractive if we go about

them in the same way, rather than to plan some sort of entertainment

where only a few are to have a part, as is usually the case.

There is almost no limit to the number of interesting and instructive

things we can do, and it will be possible for even the more advanced

bird students to learn something new at nearly every meeting.

Every member should have a notebook for keeping a record of the birds

seen and identified, with any new or interesting things observed, for

comparison with others at each meeting; and each member should have a

standing in the club according to the number of birds identified and the

amount of work done for the birds. This will be an inducement for each

member to do something or learn something new before the next meeting,

and to be present at all the meetings, to learn what others have done.

It will also be found helpful in learning about birds and in remembering

what is seen; for, unless we have some special reason for noting

carefully all that may be seen on our walks, even the most interested

observers will miss many things, and will forget much of what they did

see.

When about to start on a walk of about three miles, one bright pleasant

morning last June, I decided to keep a list of all the birds seen and

heard from the time I started until I returned. The walk was finished

between twelve and one o'clock, when most of the birds were quiet and

few were seen; yet I saw 105 birds on the trip, and had a good idea of

the number and variety of birds one might see at this time of the year.

If I had kept no record of the number, I could not have told how many I

was likely to see, or which species would be seen oftenest. All such

things will prove interesting at the meetings, and will add largely to

our knowledge of birds in the course of a year.

In winter, we should note the feeding habits of the different birds and

the number and kinds of winter visitors seen; it is also a good time to

make a study of nests, where they are placed, and the material used in

each.

In summer, there will be something for every day if we have our eyes

open; nesting habits, bird-baths, and occasionally some rare migrant to

tell about. It would be impossible to give a complete list of the

interesting things to be seen at this time.

Every club should own a few good reference books, and have them at their

meetings, to settle any questions that may arise. The 'Color Key to

North American Birds,' by Chapman, will be found useful for

identification, 'Wild Bird Guests,' by Baynes, for matters pertaining to

bird clubs and bird protection, also 'Useful Birds and their

Protection,' by Forbush.

There are many others that would prove beneficial, but these three are

almost indispensable, if we would learn the ways of our wild bird

friends and what we can do to help them.

It is understood that every family of bird lovers will be subscribers to

BIRD-LORE, for few would be willing to miss the interesting bits of

information to be found in every number of this bird magazine.

Selections from BIRD-LORE, the Audubon Leaflets, books on Nature by

standard authors, and occasionally articles from some of the popular

magazines, might be read at each meeting. This will prove a very

interesting part of the program, and there will always be material

enough to fill out any schedule.

Good plates of birds like those obtained with the Audubon Leaflets and

the set published with the 'Birds of New York' will help in

identifications, and, as the cost is very small, every club should have

at least one set of each.

If we can get our clubs once started along these lines, it seems

possible that it might become more of a problem to find time for

everything than to find something to do.

One year's course in a bird club of this kind should give every member a

fairly good knowledge of what we can do for the birds, and what they are

doing for us.--W. M. BUSWELL, _Superintendent Meriden, (N. H.) Bird

Club_.

Ornithological Possibilities of a Bit of Swamp-Land

For several years, I have had a bit of swamp-land under my eye,

especially during the cooler months. It is not exactly a beauty-spot,

being bordered by ragged backyards, city dumps, a small tannery, and a

dismantled factory, formerly used by a company engaged in cleaning hair

for plasterers' use.

A part of the surface is covered by cat-tails, the rest by a mixed

growth of water-loving shrubs, as sweet-gale, leather-leaf, andromeda,

and other shrubs which like to dabble their roots in ooze. A brook,

connecting two large ponds, runs through the swamp, giving current and

temperature enough to make certain a large amount of open water, even in

the coldest weather.

A little colony of Wilson's Snipe have made this swamp their winter home

for at least fifteen years, and probably much longer. Song, and

generally Swamp Sparrows can be found here all winter. This winter, we

have a Green-winged Teal, finding feed enough to induce her to remain;

and over beside the cat-tails, about some fallen willows, a Winter Wren

seems much at home.

During recent years, a sort of beach, made by dumping gravel to cover

refuse from the hair factory, has been a favored feeding place for

various Sandpipers, as well as the Snipe. The last of the Sandpipers

leave in November, while the Snipe remain.

Bitterns and Black-crowned Night Herons drop in during the fall and

summer, and our increasing Ring-neck Pheasant, the gunner's pet, loves

to skulk around the edges.

Tree Sparrows, Goldfinches, and their kin attract an occasional

Butcherbird and the smaller Hawks, Pigeon, Sparrow, and Sharp-shin in

season.

Early spring brings a host of Blackbirds, Redwings, Bronzed Grackles,

and Rusties; while a Cowbird hung about with some English Sparrows,

until Thanksgiving time, this year.

We are always on the lookout for something new to turn up in the swamp,

and are seldom disappointed. For so small a place, not over five acres,

it surely is a bird haven; especially does it seem so when, but a few

rods away on the nearby ponds, the ice-men are harvesting twelve-inch

ice. Naturally, local bird-lovers are praying that the hand of

"improvement" will be stayed a long time in wiping out this neglected

little nook.--ARTHUR P. STUBBS, _Lynn, Mass._

My Neighbor's Sparrow Trap

My neighbor one block to the north, Professor E. R. Ristine, who gives

me leave to use his name in the present connection, finally lost his

patience with English Sparrows (_Passer domesticus_), on or about May

15, 1915. The fact that an elderly person sharing the home with his

family could not sleep at reasonable hours on account of Sparrow chatter

was an element in the decision to which he soon came. For into his hands

fell an advertisement of a Sparrow trap, just such a two-funnel wire

affair as was described and recommended as early as 1912 by the

Department of Agriculture in Farmers' Bulletin 493. On May 20, 1915, the

trap arrived, and was duly installed and baited. It was at first placed

on the ground in the small chicken-yard at the rear of the house, and

the outer funnel was baited with a small amount of cracked grain, the

finer "chick-feed" proving to be most efficacious. The location of the

trap was changed at different times during the spring, summer, and fall,

and the total results on the Sparrow population were satisfactory beyond

expectations.

By June 11, only twenty-two days after the trap was set out, 78 Sparrows

had passed the fatal inner funnel of that simple contrivance, and at

this, fortunately for the accurate details of the present account, my

neighbor's interest was aroused to know precisely what the powers of his

most recent purchase might really be. With a pencil he marked thereafter

on the siding of his hen-house the mortuary record: 6/13--84, 6/17--100,

7/9--202, and so forth. That is to say, a total of 202 birds had been

gathered in by July 9, fifty days after the trap was put into action, or

an average of a little more than four per day. This rate of destruction

was much increased during the following month, the 300 mark being passed

on July 27, and the 400 mark on August 11. The rate of capture then

declined, and it was not until September 18 that the figure 508 was

registered. The trap remained set until December 5, at which time the

deadly record stood at 597. A few dozens more had entered the trap but

escaped through the insufficient latching of the "clean-out" door. After

December 5 heavy snows fell, followed by sleet storms, and my neighbor

temporarily placed his trap out of service on a back porch.

A few facts in connection with the above record will prove of interest.

The heaviest catches were made when the currants became very ripe and

the trap was placed under the laden bushes. Fewest Sparrows were caught

when the sweet corn in the garden was in the milk stage, the birds

preferring the contents of the juicy kernels to the dry grain with which

the trap was baited. The largest catch on any one day was 20 birds, this

number being reached on two different dates, June 27 and August 4. The

Sparrows seemed to arrive in flocks of greater or less size, and the

record would mount rapidly until these were gathered in. Then, for

several days possibly, no birds at all would be trapped. And the fine

feature of the entire season's experience was that this trap caught

English Sparrows and no other bird whatsoever. The only exception to

English Sparrows was a single hoary old house rat that had evidently

followed a Sparrow in; at any rate, the latter was found partially

devoured.

Relief from the Sparrow nuisance began to come to our neighborhood about

the middle of August, after full 400 of the noisy chatterers had fallen

victim to the innocent-looking wire cage. And by the time the Indian

summer days of October came, the English Sparrow tribe in our part of

town had dropped from the status of "abundant" to only "fairly common."

Indeed, I have not seen more than six individuals together in our end of

the little city at any time in the last three months.

Is it possible that my neighbor's experience was out of the ordinary? I

do not see why it should be, but I have found a similar record only in

the above-mentioned Farmers' Bulletin, where the capture of 300 Sparrows

in six weeks in the Missouri Botanical Gardens, St. Louis, is noted. If

it is at all typical of what may be accomplished, then one or two things

seem clear. An easy method is at hand for holding in check the Sparrow

nuisance and more attention should be given to Farmers' Bulletin 493

than seems thus far to have been accorded this worthy

publication.--CHARLES R. KEYES, _Mt. Vernon, Iowa_.

A Tropical Migration Tragedy

[We are indebted to Prof. M. H. Saville for a copy of 'El Comercio' for

October 18, 1915, a newspaper published at San Pedro Sula, Honduras,

which contains the following account of a migration tragedy.--EDITOR.]

"At midnight, on October 10, 1915, there commenced to appear groups of

birds flying in a southerly direction. At the time darkness set in, we

began to hear the call of a great number of birds that were circling

constantly over the city. This avian invasion increased considerably

during the night. The main part of the army of invasion crossing the

Gulf of Honduras arrived in the evening off the coast of Puerto Cortes.

These birds do not travel by day, but follow the eastern shore, guided

by certain groups that, toward night, exhausted, ceasing their flight,

turn inland. The bright rays from the electric lights projected high in

among the clouds, serving to indicate the position of San Pedro Sula

and, attracted by its splendor, the bird emigrants, greatly fatigued by

their vigorous exercise in the long flight against contrary winds in

their travel across the Gulf of Mexico (approximately 700 miles), their

short stay in Yucatan, and their flight across the Gulf of Honduras, the

greater part of them fell one upon another in their revolutions about

the lights, some dropping half-crazed against the roofs and fences,

breaking wings and legs, some dying outright.

"At two o'clock in the morning, the greater part of the expedition

directed toward this zone had arrived in the neighborhood of the city.

It was at that time that the sound of their striking against the posts

and the electric wires was a continual tattoo. It seemed almost as

though the stones in the streets had been awakened, and were being

hurled against the inhabitants. Numbers of birds striking against the

zinc roofs gave off a sound like hurrying footsteps, the drumming on the

zinc extending over the entire city. At one spot within a radius of two

yards there fell dying six wounded birds. In the morning the streets

were strewn with bodies; the greater part of them dead, others wounded."

A Shower of Birds

In the fall of 1915, a violent wind-storm passed through the southern

states, just grazing the edge of Spartanburg, in upper South Carolina.

Here the minister of the First Presbyterian Church was about to take

shelter in his home, from the fury of the wind, when he saw what

appeared to be a small, black cloud swoop down upon his roof and

disappear. He hastened in, and found, to his and his family's dismay,

that little black birds were fairly pouring down one of the chimneys.

The birds seemed to have been stunned by the force of the gale to which

they had been exposed, and the floor was soon covered, several inches

deep, with their inanimate bodies. They were picked up by the bucketful,

and thrown out, but soon revived and flew away, none the worse,

apparently, for their unusual experience. Two little fellows who were

overlooked took refuge on a curtain pole, where they were discovered by

a little girl, several hours later.

This is probably the only time on record when it literally rained birds.

The birds were common Chimney Swifts.--R. L. FRIPP, _Spartanburg, S. C._

A Heron's Involuntary Bath

Some of the little comedies of bird life are amusing to the onlooker,

although, like those happening to human beings, not always so pleasant

to the individuals participating. A neighbor of mine where I live on the

shores of an island in the Great South Bay, took up his dock for the

winter season and left a stake in the water. It is beneath the surface

except at low tide when it projects an inch or two above. At dusk on the

evening of October 23, 1915, two Black-crowned Night Herons came winging

along. The one in the lead, happening to spy the top of the nearly

submerged stake, immediately dropped down and appropriated it for a

temporary fishing-station. Its mate, probably trusting it had landed in

very shallow water, dropped down also beside it. But it kept on going

down until only its head and shoulders protruded. It was a surprised

bird, and stood there a few minutes in its awkward predicament, looking

around as if vainly trying to grasp the situation. Then, finally giving

it up, it managed to spring out and fly off.--JOHN R. TOOKER, _Babylon,

Long Island_.

Winter Notes from Carlisle, Ind.

We are having a very mild winter, with heavy rains. During last week it

has been warm, and numerous Robins have been here. There is a

twenty-acre alfalfa field adjoining town, and some eight acres of it was

mown only once and the other crop left on the ground. This makes a

regular haven for the Meadow Larks, and during the past week they have

been having a regular carnival. You can hear dozens of them singing at a

time. There must be hundreds of them in this field. Song Sparrows have

also been singing.--J. H. GILLILAND, _Carlisle, Ind._

Notes from Nebraska

What is the most abundant bird in a given locality? This a question

often conjectured upon by both ornithologists and casual observers. The

terms "abundant," "common," "scarce," or "very scarce," form poor

records of actual abundance, as suggested in recent issues of BIRD-LORE.

So, to get data on actual abundance, I took weekly bird censuses during

the months of May, June, July, and a part of August, 1915, making counts

of both number of species and number of individuals.

Of eight such censuses, taken during June, July, and August, in

northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska, Dickcissels proved to be

the most abundant in six, if the exception is made of English Sparrows,

which led in numbers in two censuses. This, I should say, would be the

case over a large part of the middle West, of which the above-mentioned

vicinities are typical.

Here are my figures on the Dickcissel:

*June 5. Sabetha, Kan., 99 individuals noted in 4-3/4 hours afield.

*June 12. Du Bois, Nebr., 64 individuals noted in 5 hours afield.

*June 19. Pawnee, Nebr., 35 individuals noted in 5 hours afield.

*June 27. Lewiston, Nebr., 109 individuals noted in 6-1/2 hours afield.

*July 5. Beatrice, Nebr., 25 individuals noted in 4-1/2 hours afield.

July 11. Beatrice, Nebr., 46 individuals noted in 6 hours afield.

July 25. Hebron, Nebr., 36 individuals noted in 3-3/4 hours afield.

*Aug. 1. Ruskin, Nebr., 39 individuals noted in 5 hours afield.

Dates preceded by an asterisk are those upon which the counts showed the

Dickcissel to be the most abundant species, English Sparrows excepted.

These figures indicate an average of 11-1/4 Dickcissels seen or heard

per hour.

And, in spite of this prominent place the Dickcissel holds in our bird

life, I have talked numbers of times with intelligent people who not

only disclaim any knowledge of the bird, but say they have never heard

the name 'Dickcissel' before.

On July 11, 1915, in and around Beatrice, Nebr., I counted 5,483

Blackbirds, which I am reasonably sure were Bronzed Grackles. Of this

number, 5,260 were counted from one location on the bank of the Big Blue

River, the flock passing continuously for about one hour. This is

mentioned as being further indicative of actual abundance, and it might

be suggested that, in actual numbers, the Bronzed Grackles might

outweigh the Dickcissels, their immense numbers in flocks more than

making up for the more uniform local distribution of the non-flocking

Dickcissels.

In the May-June, 1915, number of BIRD-LORE, I note that Mr. Ridgway

classes the Upland Plover as a "species verging toward extermination,"

speaking of it as now very scarce in southern Illinois. This bird of

the prairies is still to be found in southeastern Nebraska, and I

believe it could not be called very scarce in that locality. On June 27,

1915, in Pawnee County, Nebraska, I saw a flock of nine of these birds;

on July 11, in Gage County, I noted one; on July 12, in Gage County, I

noted eight; on July 23, in Thayer County, I noted one; and on August 1,

in Nuckolls County, I saw a flock of ten.

Mr. Ridgway's description of the song of the Upland Plover is a fitting

one. Its peculiar, mournful whistle _is_ "one of the most thrilling of

bird songs."--HOWARD PARET, _Kansas City, Mo._

A Gannet Over the Hudson River

Bird-Lore, March-April 1916 · 第 2 / 8 段