GROWING OLD GRACEFULLY, AND PRESBYTERIANISM.

_Question_. How have you acquired the art of growing old

gracefully?

_Answer_. It is very hard to live a great while without getting

old, and it is hardly worth while to die just to keep young. It

is claimed that people with certain incomes live longer than those

who have to earn their bread. But the income people have a stupid

kind of life, and though they may hang on a good many years, they

can hardly be said to do much real living. The best you can say

is, not that they lived so many years, but that it took them so

many years to die. Some people imagine that regular habits prolong

life, but that depends somewhat on the habits. Only the other day

I read an article written by a physician, in which regular habits

--good ones, were declared to be quite dangerous.

Where life is perfectly regular, all the wear and tear comes on

the same nerves--every blow falls on the same place. Variety, even

in a bad direction, is a great relief. But living long has nothing

to do with getting old gracefully. Good nature is a great enemy

of wrinkles, and cheerfulness helps the complexion. If we could

only keep from being annoyed at little things, it would add to the

luxury of living. Great sorrows are few, and after all do not

affect us as much as the many irritating, almost nothings that

attack from every side. The traveler is bothered more with dust

than mountains. It is a great thing to have an object in life--

something to work for and think for. If a man thinks only about

himself, his own comfort, his own importance, he will not grow old

gracefully. More and more his spirit, small and mean, will leave

its impress on his face, and especially in his eyes. You look at

him and feel that there is no jewel in the casket; that a shriveled

soul is living in a tumble-down house.

The body gets its grace from the mind. I suppose that we are all

more or less responsible for our looks. Perhaps the thinker of

great thoughts, the doer of noble deeds, moulds his features in

harmony with his life.

Probably the best medicine, the greatest beautifier in the world,

is to make somebody else happy. I have noticed that good mothers

have faces as serene as a cloudless day in June, and the older the

serener. It is a great thing to know the relative importance of

things, and those who do, get the most out of life. Those who take

an interest in what they see, and keep their minds busy are always

young.

The other day I met a blacksmith who has given much attention to

geology and fossil remains. He told me how happy he was in his

excursions. He was nearly seventy years old, and yet he had the

enthusiasm of a boy. He said he had some very fine specimens,

"but," said he, "nearly every night I dream of finding perfect

ones."

That man will keep young as long as he lives. As long as a man

lives he should study. Death alone has the right to dismiss the

school. No man can get too much knowledge. In that, he can have

all the avarice he wants, but he can get too much property. If

the business men would stop when they got enough, they might have

a chance to grow old gracefully. But the most of them go on and

on, until, like the old stage horse, stiff and lame, they drop dead

in the road. The intelligent, the kind, the reasonably contented,

the courageous, the self-poised, grow old gracefully.

_Question_. Are not the restraints to free religious thought being

worn away, as the world grows older, and will not the recent attacks

of the religious press and pulpit upon the unorthodoxy of Dr.

Briggs, Rev. R. Heber Newton and the prospective Episcopal bishop

of Massachusetts, Dr. Phillips Brooks, and others, have a tendency

still further to extend this freedom?

_Answer_. Of course the world is growing somewhat wiser--getting

more sense day by day. It is amazing to me that any human being

or beings ever wrote the Presbyterian creed. Nothing can be more

absurd--more barbaric than that creed. It makes man the sport of

an infinite monster, and yet good people, men and women of ability,

who have gained eminence in almost every department of human effort,

stand by this creed as if it were filled with wisdom and goodness.

They really think that a good God damns his poor ignorant children

just for his own glory, and that he sends people to perdition, not

for any evil in them, but to the praise of his glorious justice.

Dr. Briggs has been wicked enough to doubt this phase of God's

goodness, and Dr. Bridgman was heartless enough to drop a tear in

hell. Of course they have no idea of what justice really is.

The Presbyterian General Assembly that has just adjourned stood by

Calvinism. The "Five Points" are as sharp as ever. The members

of that assembly--most of them--find all their happiness in the

"creed." They need no other amusement. If they feel blue they

read about total depravity--and cheer up. In moments of great

sorrow they think of the tale of non-elect infants, and their hearts

overflow with a kind of joy.

They cannot imagine why people wish to attend the theatre when they

can read the "Confession of Faith," or why they should feel like

dancing after they do read it.

It is very sad to think of the young men and women who have been

eternally ruined by witnessing the plays of Shakespeare, and it is

also sad to think of the young people, foolish enough to be happy,

keeping time to the pulse of music, waltzing to hell in loving

pairs--all for the glory of God, and to the praise of his glorious

justice. I think, too, of the thousands of men and women who, while

listening to the music of Wagner, have absolutely forgotten the

Presbyterian creed, and who for a little while have been as happy

as if the creed had never been written. Tear down the theatres,

burn the opera houses, break all musical instruments, and then let

us go to church.

I am not at all surprised that the General Assembly took up this

progressive euchre matter. The word "progressive" is always

obnoxious to the ministers. Euchre under another name might go.

Of course, progressive euchre is a kind of gambling. I knew a

young man, or rather heard of him, who won at progressive euchre

a silver spoon. At first this looks like nothing, almost innocent,

and yet that spoon, gotten for nothing, sowed the seed of gambling

in that young man's brain. He became infatuated with euchre, then

with cards in general, then with draw-poker in particular,--then

into Wall Street. He is now a total wreck, and has the impudence

to say that is was all "pre-ordained." Think of the thousands and

millions that are being demoralized by games of chance, by marbles

--when they play for keeps--by billiards and croquet, by fox and

geese, authors, halma, tiddledywinks and pigs in clover. In all

these miserable games, is the infamous element of chance--the raw

material of gambling. Probably none of these games could be played

exclusively for the glory of God. I agree with the Presbyterian

General Assembly, if the creed is true, why should anyone try to

amuse himself? If there is a hell, and all of us are going there,

there should never be another smile on the human face. We should

spend our days in sighs, our nights in tears. The world should go

insane. We find strange combinations--good men with bad creeds,

and bad men with good ones--and so the great world stumbles along.

--_The Blade_, Toledo, Ohio, June 4, 1891.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Interviews · 第 102 / 144 题