POLITICS AND BRITISH COLUMBIA.

_Question_. I understand that there was some trouble in connection

with your lecture in Victoria, B. C. What are the facts?

_Answer_. The published accounts, as circulated by the Associated

Press, were greatly exaggerated. The affair was simply this: The

authorities endeavored to prevent the lecture. They refused the

license, on the ground that the theatre was unsafe, although it

was on the ground floor, had many exits and entrances, not counting

the windows. The theatre was changed to meet the objections of

the fire commissioner, and the authorities expressed their satisfaction

and issued the license. Afterward further objection was raised,

and on the night of the lecture, when the building was about two-

thirds full, the police appeared and said that the lecture would

not be allowed to be delivered, because the house was unsafe.

After a good deal of talk, the policeman in authority said that

there should be another door, whereupon my friends, in a few minutes,

made another door with an ax and a saw, the crowd was admitted and

the lecture was delivered. The audience was well-behaved, intelligent

and appreciative. Beyond some talking in the hall, and the natural

indignation of those who had purchased tickets and were refused

admittance, there was no disturbance. I understand that those who

opposed the lecture are now heartily ashamed of the course pursued.

_Question_. Are you going to take any part in the campaign?

_Answer_. It is not my intention to make any political speeches.

I have made a good many in the past, and, in my judgment, have done

my part. I have no other interest in politics than every citizen

should have. I want that party to triumph which, in my judgment,

represents the best interests of the country. I have no doubt

about the issue of the election. I believe that Mr. Blaine will

be the next President. But there are plenty of talkers, and I

really think that I have earned a vacation.

_Question_. What do you think Cleveland's chances are in New York?

_Answer_. At this distance it is hard to say. The recent action

of Tammany complicates matters somewhat. But my opinion is that

Blaine will carry the State. I had a letter yesterday from that

State, giving the opinion of a gentleman well informed, that Blaine

would carry New York by no less than fifty thousand majority.

_Question_. What figure will Butler cut in the campaign?

_Answer_. I hardly think that Butler will have many followers on

the 4th of November. His forces will gradually go to one side or

the other. It is only when some great principle is at stake that

thousands of men are willing to vote with a known minority.

_Question_. But what about the Prohibitionists?

_Answer_. They have a very large following. They are fighting

for something they believe to be of almost infinite consequence,

and I can readily understand how a Prohibitionist is willing to be

in the minority. It may be well enough for me to say here, that

my course politically is not determined by my likes or dislikes of

individuals. I want to be governed by principles, not persons.

If I really thought that in this campaign a real principle was at

stake, I should take part. The only great question now is protection,

and I am satisfied that it is in no possible danger.

_Question_. Not even in the case of a Democratic victory?

_Answer_. Not even in the event of a Democratic victory. No State

in the Union is for free trade. Every free trader has an exception.

These exceptions combined, control the tariff legislation of this

country, and if the Democrats were in power to-day, with the control

of the House and Senate and Executive, the exceptions would combine

and protect protection. As long as the Federal Government collects

taxes or revenue on imports, just so long these revenues will be

arranged to protect home manufactures.

_Question_. You said that if there were a great principle at stake,

you would take part in the campaign. You think, then, that there

is no great principle involved?

_Answer_. If it were a matter of personal liberty, I should take

part. If the Republican party had stood by the Civil Rights Bill,

I should have taken part in the present campaign.

_Question_. Still, I suppose we can count on you as a Republican?

_Answer_. Certainly, I am a Republican.

--_Evening Post_, San Francisco, California, September 16, 1884.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Interviews · 第 53 / 144 题