REVELATION.

For eighteen centuries the people of this world have been groping in

spiritual darkness. They have had the Bible, it is true, but what have

they learned from it? In letter, many things. In the true spirit of

divine inspiration, they have learned little. "The letter killeth, but

the spirit giveth life." (II Cor. iii:6.) They are "ever learning,

and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." (II Tim.

iii:7.) These statements of Holy Writ are fully corroborated by human

experience in religious matters. The world is divided and sub-divided

into many contending factions, professing Christianity, yet not having

a unity of faith. Many ideas of the Lord, many faiths in baptism. "One

Lord, one faith, one baptism." (Eph. iv:5), was the doctrine of Paul.

"Straight is the gate and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life,

and few there be that find it." (Matthew vii:14.)

What is the cause of all this uncertainty respecting the glorious plan

of eternal life? If one was or is right, all opposing methods must be

wrong. We answer that the lack of unity, the ignorance in relation

to the Gospel, and finally skepticism and infidelity, are due to

substituting the wisdom of men for the revelation of God, using human

learning instead of the inspiration of the Holy Ghost.

We desire to show in this article that without direct and continuous

revelation from God, the Gospel cannot be understood and properly

applied for the salvation of mankind, nor can the purposes of God

be accomplished on the earth. First, we take direct statements of

Scripture: "Where there is no vision, the people perish; but he that

keepeth the law, happy is he." (Prov. xxix:18.) The law of God has

never been kept without the Spirit of God to enlighten those who

sought to keep it. The history of the human family, from Adam to Noah,

from Noah to Moses, from Moses to the Lord Jesus Christ, and in all

subsequent ages, proves beyond cavil that where there was no vision

from heaven, no inspired voice, no revelation, the people utterly

perished in darkness and unbelief. The combined wisdom and learning of

men could not save them from spiritual darkness.

That there may be an authorized channel of communication between the

heavens and the earth, the Lord has, whenever His Church has existed

on the earth, appointed men to receive His will and make it known to

the people. "Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but He revealeth His

secrets unto His servants, the prophets." (Amos iii:7.) This literally

might be understood as equivalent to saying that where no prophet was,

there the Lord was doing nothing that would result in man's salvation.

Without being technical respecting the language of Amos, the history

of the world from Adam down proves his statements true. When there

has been no prophet there has been no revelation from God. When there

has been no revelation or vision the people have wandered to and fro,

have tossed upon the billows of clashing opinion, perished in darkness

and have been buried in the great ocean of doubt and uncertainty. On

the other hand, when authorized prophets have existed among men we

may exclaim with the ancient Scriptures: "I have also spoken by the

prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the

ministry of the prophets. And by a prophet the Lord brought Israel out

of Egypt, and by a prophet was he preserved." (Hosea xii:10, 13.) And we

affirm that without prophets Israel never was preserved and never will

be.

In looking over the field of mysterious sayings contained in the Bible,

as well as the mystery which enshrouds many phases of human history,

we are consoled by the promise of the Savior: "For there is nothing

covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be

known." (Luke xii:2; Matthew x:26; Mark iv:22.) In this connection we

may cite the fact that men by learning do not see the truth alike, they

do not harmonize on the fundamental principles of the Gospel. As an

example, they cannot, unaided by revelation, tell the origin, history

and destiny of the American Indians.

Isaiah, over 200 years before the advent of the Messiah, foresaw the

spiritual ignorance of the last days and how that condition would

be overcome by the light of revelation. He prophesied as follows:

"Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with

their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their

heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept

of men: Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvelous work among

this people, even a marvelous work and a wonder; for the wisdom of

their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men

shall be hid." (Isa. xxix:13, 14.) By reading the context it is evident

that the prophecy refers to a time later than the first coming of the

Savior, and that the prediction never could be verified without direct

revelation from heaven.

Paul, writing to the Hebrews, calls attention to the great truth that

the method of the Lord in leading His people from the beginning has

been by revelation. He says: "God, who at sundry times and in divers

manners, spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in

these last days spoken unto us by His Son." (Heb. i:1, 2.) Jesus said in

St. John xvii:3: "And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee,

the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent." Paul says in

I Cor. xii:3. "No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy

Ghost."

When Peter received a knowledge of the divinity and mission of the

Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior said unto him: "Blessed art thou, Simon

Bar-jona; for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but

my Father, which is in heaven." It required a revelation for Peter

to receive that testimony. How could any one receive that knowledge

without revelation from God? The Jews saw Jesus, witnessed His wondrous

miracles of healing the sick, giving sight to the blind, unstopping

the ears of the deaf and even raising the dead, but all that was not

sufficient. They read the ancient prophecies, pointing to the birth and

nativity, the birthplace, life, ministry and martyrdom of the Messiah.

Yet were they blind, with eyes to see; deaf, with ears to hear, and

without understanding. No reason can be assigned for the ignorance of

the masses and the enlightenment of the humble fishermen other than

that the former depended upon the learning of men; the latter had

received a revelation from God.

To place the necessity of revelation beyond question as to obtaining

a knowledge of God, we quote the statement of Jesus to His disciples:

"All things are delivered to me of my Father; and no man knoweth who

the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and

he to whom the Son will reveal Him." (Luke x:22.) Compare this plain,

unmistakable testimony of Jesus with the assertions of modern divines,

who claim that the canon of Scripture is full and that we do not need

divine revelation as it was given to men in ancient days. The position

of the latter simply contradicts the plainest teachings of Holy Writ.

If it required revelation 2,000 years ago to know that Jesus was the

Christ, nothing short of revelation from heaven will secure that

knowledge now. Notice, too, the remarkable fact that notwithstanding

all the personal experience of the apostles through their association

with the Savior, He commanded them to "tarry ye at Jerusalem until ye

be endued with power from on high." (Luke, chapter 24.)

Another phase of the subject is this, that men claim that which is

written in the Scriptures is sufficient. This view simply makes

uninspired men the judge of what is and what is not essential as to all

the writings of the apostles and prophets of the Lord Jesus. This is an

unwarrantable assumption, condemned by the Scripture; for John says,

concerning that which he had written in the Book of Revelation: "For I

testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this

book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him

the plagues that are written in this book; and if any man shall take

away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away

his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from

the things which are written in this book." (Rev. xxii:18, 19.)

This does not deny God the privilege of adding more revelation, as it

is an undisputed fact that the Gospel according to St. John was written

subsequent to the Apocalypse; but it is a decree of divine displeasure

upon any man who shall add to or take from the revelations of the

Almighty. In the face of this decree, history informs us that councils

of the Roman Church sat in judgment upon the writings of the apostles,

and received only that which, in the light of their human wisdom, was

acceptable to them. Notwithstanding this fact, the various factions of

Christendom are essaying to build upon the foundation of what has come

down to them through the channel of unauthorized councils of men. May

we not ask with perfect propriety, is not that which was rejected or

lost just as valuable as much of that which has been handed down to us?

As proof that writings of the disciples of Jesus have been lost to

the world, I would call special attention to several passages of

the Scripture. The writings of the New Testament are from eight

authors--Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, James and Jude. Luke

says: "Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a

declaration of these things which are most surely believed among us."

(Luke i:1.) While there is no definite proof in this statement as to

how many had written their testimonies concerning the Messiah, it is

evident they were not few, but many. That there was opportunity and

material upon which to write respecting this glorious subject, the life

and ministry of Jesus, is very apparent from the last verse of the

twenty-first chapter of St. John, as follows: "And there are also many

other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written,

every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the

books that should be written." With such a statement, it is to be

wondered at that the world who believed in the Redeemer should rest

contented with the narrow view that we have all that is important.

We have in the New Testament what is called I Cor. and II Cor., written

to the Saints in Corinth by the apostle Paul. In I Cor. chapter v:9,

we have this: "I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with

fornicators." This must have been previous to the one in which this

occurs, and yet such an epistle is not found in our New Testament.

In Col. iv:16, Paul says: "And when this epistle is read among you,

cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that

ye likewise read the epistle from Laodicea." This refers to an epistle

from Paul to the Colossians, written from Laodicea, but which is not

found in the canon of Scripture as we have it. In II Tim., chapter

iv:13, Paul requests Timothy to bring him certain parchments; what

they contained we know not. Jude says: "And Enoch also, the seventh

from Adam, prophesied of these things, saying: 'Behold the Lord cometh

with ten thousand of His saints.'" How delightful it would be to read

the predictions and teachings of that great prophet Enoch, the man

who walked and talked with God 365 years, "and was not, for God took

him." Only a few verses in the Old and New Testament are all we have in

the canon of Scripture respecting Enoch and his city. What a glorious

flood of light will dawn upon the world when the writings of Enoch are

revealed! In the Old Testament may be found references to about thirty

books written by the Jewish scribes and prophets, but which have been

lost to the world, rejected and cast aside by uninspired, unauthorized

councils of men.

Suppose that all that is necessary so far as explanation of doctrine

is concerned is contained in the New Testament, we are then confronted

with man's inability to understand what has been revealed without

the light of revelation to guide the human mind in understanding and

applying the truth. As proof of this I will cite the testimony of Paul:

"For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which

is in him? Even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of

God. * * * But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit

of God; for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them,

because they are spiritually discerned." (I Cor. ii:11, 14.) Jesus said

to Nicodemus: "Except a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of

God." (St. John iii:3.) "No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by

the Holy Ghost." (I Cor. xii:3.) The truth of these sacred sayings is

verified by the history of the world, which has languished in darkness

without revelation, as shown by previous quotations.

Another very important feature of this subject consists in the fact,

that there always have been in every gospel dispensation labors to

perform of a practical character, such as the building of temples,

the gathering of Israel out of Egypt, the building of the Ark of

the Covenant, etc., none of which could be accomplished except by

direct revelation from God. We may therefore conclude that while the

ordinances and doctrines of the gospel are eternal and unchangeable,

the circumstances associated with the people in every dispensation of

the gospel are constantly changing. The emergencies of this situation

must be met, not by the dead letter of ancient Scripture, but by

present inspiration and revelation given through living oracles of God.

"By a prophet the Lord brought Israel out of Egypt, and by a prophet

was he preserved." (Hosea xii:13.) The prophecies of the Jewish

prophets in the Old Testament, pointing to the advent of the Messiah,

are clear and explicit. Read the seventh chapter of Isaiah, fourteenth

verse; the ninth chapter and sixth verse; the fifty-third chapter of

the same book; the fifth chapter of Micah, second verse; and many other

passages of the Old Testament. In these we find plain predictions which

were verified in the birth, ministry and crucifixion of the Savior,

which were read by the Jews but not understood by them, because the

light of revelation from God was not the source of their information.

This was rather the wisdom of their own learning, which led them to

reject the Messiah and discard the great message of life which He

brought unto them.

As there were many plain prophecies relating to the first coming of

the Savior and the great work associated with His advent, so there are

pointed predictions referring to His second coming and a work of great

magnitude to precede that great event. I will call attention to a few

as proof that more revelation will be given, and that without it these

prophecies could never be fulfilled: "Behold, I will send my messenger,

and he shall prepare the way before me; and the Lord, whom ye seek,

shall suddenly come to His temple, even the Messenger of the covenant,

whom ye delight in; behold, He shall come, saith the Lord of hosts.

But who may abide the day of His coming? and who shall stand when He

appeareth? for He is like a refiners' fire, and like fuller's sore. *

* * And He shall purify the sons of Levi," etc. (Mal. iii:1-3.) This

prophecy must refer to His second coming. At His first advent He did

not come suddenly; He did not come to His temple. The house of the Lord

had become "a den of thieves." He did not accept it. He did not purify

the sons of Levi. It was a day when they could in their wickedness

abide His coming. "Who shall stand when He appeareth" is clearly a

condition when He shall come in power and glory to take vengeance on

the ungodly.

How could He suddenly come to His temple unless a temple should be

built for Him? One could not be built without a chosen people to build

it; and how can men build the house of the Lord without revelation to

tell them where, when and how to construct such a holy edifice? In

Malachi, chapter iv, we have a very striking prophecy of the judgments

of the Almighty in the last days, before the coming of the Lord. In

the fifth verse the prophet says, "Behold, I will send you Elijah the

Prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord."

The great prophet Elijah, who was taken to heaven in a chariot of fire

without tasting death, was to visit the earth in the last days. The

apostle John, when upon the isle of Patmos, also saw the hour of God's

judgement, and uttered the following prediction: "And I saw another

angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to

preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and

kindred, and tongue, and people, Saying with a loud voice, Fear God and

give glory to Him; for the hour of His judgment is come: and worship

Him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of

waters." (Rev. xiv:6-7.) From this prophecy we learn that an angel

was to visit the earth at a later period than when John uttered the

above words. His mission was to be to restore the everlasting gospel,

a gospel that does not change; a gospel of apostles, prophets, gifts,

visions, revelations, etc.

"The everlasting gospel." Why should an angel bring the gospel if it

already existed upon the earth? Why should the call be to worship the

God who made the heavens, the earth and the fountains of water, etc.,

if these creations were brought into existence by a God "without body,

parts or passions"? This prophecy of John agrees with Peter's words

recorded in the third chapter of Acts, wherein he says: "And He shall

send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you; whom the heaven

must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God

hath spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world

began." (Acts iii: 20-22.) By this we learn that before the advent of

the Messiah to reign on earth there should be a grand restitution,

bringing back that which was lost; a restoration of revelation,

ministry of angels, prophecies, tongues, healings, miracles, etc.

Who can believe the Scriptures and yet deny the necessity for more

revelation? The quotations here given are only a few compared with many

that can be made bearing upon the subject. They all show that direct

and continuous revelation from God is an absolute necessity to the

welfare, progress and final salvation of the children of men.

Cowley's Talks on Doctrine · 第 17 / 34 题