THE VALUE OF THE MEDIUM

AS I swing through the wide country in the freshness and fullness of

a blossoming, sun-steeped morning in May, breathing the breath of

the fields and the taller by inches for the sweep of the hills and the

reaches of sky above my head, every nerve in my body is alive with

sensation and delight. My joy is in the fragrance of earth, the

ingratiating warmth of the fresh morning, the spacious, inclosing air.

My pleasure in this direct contact with the landscape is a physical

reaction, to be enjoyed only by the actual experience of it; it cannot

be reproduced by any other means; it can be recalled by memory but

faintly and as the echo of sensation. There is, however, something

else in the landscape which can be reproduced; and this recall may

seem more glorious than the original in nature. There are elements

in the scene which a painter can render for me more intensely and

vividly than I perceived them for myself. These elements embody

the value that the landscape has for my emotions. The scene appeals

to something within me which lies beyond my actual physical

contact with it and the mere sense of touch. The harmony that the

eye perceives in these open fields, the gracious line of trees along

the stream's edge, the tossing hills beyond, and the arch of the blue

sky above impregnating the earth with light, is communicated to my

spirit, and I feel that this reach of radiant country is an extension of

my own personality. A painter, by the manipulation of his color and

line and mass, concentrates and intensifies the harmony of it and so

heightens its emotional value. The meaning of the scene for the

spirit is conveyed in terms of color and mass.

Color and mass are the painter's medium, his language. The final

import of art is the _idea,_ the emotional content of the work. On his

way to the expression of his idea the artist avails himself of material

to give his feeling concrete actuality and visible or audible

realization. He paints a picture, glorious in color and compelling in

the concentration of its massing; he carves a statue, noble in form or

subtly rhythmic; he weaves a pattern of harmonious sounds. He

values objects not for their own sake but for the energies they

possess,--their power to rouse his whole being into heightened

activity. And they have this power by virtue of their material

qualities, as color and form or sound. A landscape is gay in

springtime or sad in autumn. The difference in its effect upon us is

not due to our knowledge that it is spring or autumn and our

consciousness of the associations appropriate to each season. The

emotional quality of the scene is largely a matter of its color. Let the

spring landscape be shrouded in gray mist sifting down out of gray

skies, and we are sad. Let the autumn fields and woodland sparkle

and dance in the crisp golden sunlight, and our blood dances with

them and we want to shout from full lungs. In music the major key

wakens a different emotion from the minor. The note of a violin is

virgin in quality; the voice of the 'cello is the voice of experience.

The distinctive emotional value of each instrument inheres in the

character of its sound. These qualities of objects art uses as its

language.

Though all art is one in essence, yet each art employs a medium of

its own. In order to understand a work in its scope and true

significance we must recognize that an artist thinks and feels in

terms of his special medium. His impulse to create comes with his

vision, actual or imaginative, of color or form, and his thought is

transmitted to his hand, which shapes the work, without the

intervention of words. The nature of his vehicle and the conditions

in which he works determine in large measure the details of the form

which his idea ultimately assumes. Thus a potter designs his vessel

first with reference to its use and then with regard to his material, its

character and possibilities. As he models his plastic clay upon a

wheel, he naturally makes his bowl or jug round rather than sharply

angular. A pattern for a carpet, to be woven by a system of little

squares into the fabric, will have regard for the conditions in which

it is to be rendered, and it will differ in the character of its lines and

masses from a pattern for a wall-paper, which may be printed from

blocks. The designer in stained glass will try less to make a picture

in the spirit of graphic representation than to produce an harmonious

color-pattern whose outlines will be guided and controlled by the

possibilities of the "leading" of the window. The true artist uses the

conditions and very limitations of his material as his opportunity.

The restraint imposed by the sonnet form is welcomed by the poet as

compelling a collectedness of thought and an intensity of expression

which his idea might not achieve if allowed to flow in freer channels.

The worker in iron has his triumphs; the goldsmith has his. The

limitations of each craft open to it effects which are denied to the

other. There is an art of confectionery and an art of sculpture. The

designer of frostings who has a right feeling for his art will not

emulate the sculptor and strive to model in the grand style; the

sculptor who tries to reproduce imitatively the textures of lace or

other fabrics and who exuberates in filigrees and fussinesses so far

departs from his art as to rival the confectioner. In the degree that a

painter tries to wrench his medium from its right use and function

and attempts to make his picture tell a story, which can better be told

in words, to that extent he is unfaithful to his art. Painting, working

as it does with color and form, should confine itself to the

expression of emotion and idea that can be rendered visible. On the

part of the appreciator, likewise, the emotion expressed in one kind

of medium is not to be translated into any other terms without a

difference. Every kind of material has its special value for

expression. The meaning of pictures, accordingly, is limited

precisely to the expressive power of color and form. The impression

which a picture makes upon the beholder maybe phrased by him in

words, which are his own means of expression; but he suggests the

import of the picture only incompletely. If I describe in words

Millet's painting of the "Sower" according to my understanding of it,

I am telling in my own terms what the picture means to me. What it

meant to Millet, the full and true significance of the situation as the

painter felt it, is there expressed upon his canvas in terms of visible

aspect; and correspondingly, Millet's meaning is fully and truly

received in the measure that we feel in ourselves the emotion roused

by the sight of his color and form.

The essential content of a work of art, therefore, is modified in its

effect upon us by the kind of medium in which it is presented. If an

idea phrased originally in one medium is translated into the terms of

another, we have _illustration._ Turning the pages of an "illustrated"

novel, we come upon a plate showing a man and a woman against

the background of a divan, a chair, and a tea-table. The man, in a

frock coat, holding a top hat in his left hand, extends his right hand

to the woman, who has just risen from the table. The legend under

the picture reads, "Taking his hat, he said good-by." Here the

illustrator has simply supplied a visible image of what was

suggested in the text; the drawing has no interest beyond helping the

reader to that image. It is a statement of the bare fact in other terms.

In the hands of an artist, however, the translation may take on a

value of its own, changing the original idea, adding to it, and

becoming in itself an independent work of art. This value derives

from the form into which the idea is translated. The frescoes of the

Sistine Chapel are only sublime illustration; but how little of their

power attaches to the subject they illustrate, and how much of their

sublimity lies in the painter's rendering! Conversely, an example of

the literary interpretation of a picture is Walter Pater's description of

Leonardo's Mona Lisa.

The presence that thus rose so strangely beside the waters, is

expressive of what in the ways of a thousand years men had come to

desire. Hers is the head upon which all "the ends of the world are

come," and the eyelids are a little weary. It is a beauty wrought out

from within upon the flesh, the deposit, little cell by cell, of strange

thoughts and fantastic reveries and exquisite passions. Set it for a

moment beside one of those white Greek goddesses or beautiful

women of antiquity, and how would they be troubled by this beauty,

into which the soul with all its maladies has passed! All the thoughts

and experience of the world have etched and moulded there, in that

which they have of power to refine and make expressive the outward

form, the animalism of Greece, the lust of Rome, the reverie of the

middle age with its spiritual ambition and imaginative loves, the

return of the Pagan world, the sins of the Borgias. She is older than

the rocks among which she sits; like the vampire, she has been dead

many times, and learned the secrets of the grave; and has been a

diver in deep seas, and keeps their fallen day about her; and

trafficked for strange webs with Eastern merchants; and, as Leda,

was the mother of Helen of Troy, and, as Saint Anne, the mother of

Mary; and all this has been to her but as the sound of lyres and flutes,

and lives only in the delicacy with which it has moulded the

changing lineaments, and tinged the eyelids and the hands. The

fancy of a perpetual life, sweeping together ten thousand

experiences, is an old one; and modern thought has conceived the

idea of humanity as wrought upon by, and summing up in itself, all

modes of thought and life. Certainly Lady Lisa might stand as the

embodiment of the old fancy, the symbol of the modern idea.

It is Leonardo's conception, yet with a difference. Here the critic has

woven about the subject an exquisite tissue of associations, a whole

wide background of knowledge and thought and feeling which it lay

beyond the painter's range to evoke; but the critic is denied the

vividness, the immediateness and intimate warmth of vital contact,

which the painter was able to achieve. The Lisa whom Leonardo

shows us and the Lisa whom Pater interprets for us are the same in

essence yet different in their power to affect us. The difference

resulting from the kind of medium employed is well exemplified by

Rossetti's "Blessed Damozel." The fundamental concept of both

poem and picture is identical, but picture and poem have each its

distinctive range and limitations and its own peculiar appeal. If we

cancel the common element in the two, the difference remaining

makes it possible for us to realize how much of the effect of a work

of art inheres in the medium itself. Painting may be an aid to

literature in that it helps us to more vivid images; the literary

interpretation of pictures or music gives to the works with which it

deals an intellectual definiteness. But the functions peculiar to each

art are not to be confounded nor the distinctions obscured.

Pictures are not a substitute for literature, and their true meaning is

finally not to be translated into words. Their beauty is a visible

beauty; the emotions they rouse are such as can be conveyed

through the sense of sight. In the end they carry their message

sufficingly as color and mass. Midway, however, our enjoyment

may be complicated by other elements which have their place in our

total appreciation. Thus a painting of a landscape may appeal to us

over and above its inherent beauty because we are already, out of

actual experience, familiar with the scene it represents, and the sight

of it wakens in our memory a train of pleasant allied associations. A

ruined tower, in itself an exquisite composition in color and line and

mass, may gather about it suggestions of romance, elemental

passions and wild life, and may epitomize for the beholder the

whole Middle Age. Associated interest, therefore, may be

sentimental or intellectual. It may be sensuous also, appealing to

other senses than those of sight. The sense of touch plays a large

part in our enjoyment of the world. We like the "feel" of objects, the

catch of raw silk, the chill smoothness of burnished brass, the thick

softness of mists, the "amorous wet" of green depths of sea. The

senses of taste and smell may be excited imaginatively and

contribute to our pleasure. Winslow Homer's breakers bring back to

us the salt fragrance of the ocean, and in the presence of these white

mad surges we feel the stinging spray in our faces and we taste the

cosmic exhilaration of the sea-wind. But the final meaning of a

picture resides in the total harmony of color and form, a harmony

into which we can project our whole personality and which itself

constitutes the emotional experience.

All language in its material aspect has a sensuous value, as the

wealth of color of Venetian painting, the sumptuousness of

Renaissance architecture, the melody of Mr. Swinburne's verse, the

gem-like brilliance of Stevenson's prose, the all-inclusive

sensuousness, touched with sensuality, of Wagner's music-dramas.

Because of the charm of beautiful language there are many

art-lovers who regard the sensuous qualities of the work itself as

making up the entire experience. Apart from any consideration of

intention or expressiveness, the material _thing_ which the artist's

touch summons into form is held to be "its own excuse for being."

This order of enjoyment, valid as far as it goes, falls short of

complete appreciation. It does not pass the delight one has in the

radiance of gems or the glowing tincture of some fabric. The

element of meaning does not enter in. There is a beauty for the eye

and a beauty for the mind. The qualities of material may give

pleasure to the senses; the object embodying these qualities becomes

beautiful only as it is endowed with a significance wakened in the

human spirit. A landscape, says Walter Crane, "owes a great part of

its beauty to the harmonious relation of its leading lines, or to certain

pleasant contrasts, or a certain impressiveness of form and mass, and

at the same time we shall perceive that this linear expression is

inseparable from the sentiment or emotion suggested by that

particular scene." In the appreciation of art, to stop with the

sensuous appeal of the medium is to mistake means for an end.

"Rhyme," says the author of "Intentions," "in the hands of a real

artist becomes not merely a material element of metrical beauty, but

a spiritual element of thought and passion also." An artist's color,

glorious or tender, is only a symbol and manifestation to sense of his

emotion. At first glance Titian's portrait of the "Man with the Glove"

is an ineffable color-harmony. But truly seen it is infinitely more. By

means of color and formal design Titian has embodied here his

vision of superb young manhood; by the expressive power of his

material symbols he has rendered visible his sense of dignity, of

fineness, of strength in reserve. The color is beautiful because his

idea was beautiful. Through the character of this young man as

revealed and interpreted by the artist, the beholder is brought into

contact with a vital personality, whose influence is communicated to

him; in the appreciation of Titian's message he sees and feels and

lives.

The value of the medium resided not in the material itself but in its

power for expression. When language is elaborated at the expense of

the meaning, we have in so far forth sham art. It should be easy to

distinguish in art between what is vital and what is mechanical. The

mechanical is the product of mere execution and calls attention to

the manner. The vital is born out of inspiration, and the living idea

transmutes its material into emotion. Too great an effort at

realization defeats the intended illusion, for we think only of the

skill exercised to effect the result, and the operation of the intellect

inhibits feeling. In the greatest art the medium is least perceived, and

the beholder stands immediately in the presence of the artist's idea.

The material is necessarily fixed and finite; the idea struggles to free

itself from its medium and untrammeled to reach the spirit. It is

mind speaking to mind. However complete the material expression

may seem, it is only a part of what the artist would say; imagination

transcends the actual. In the art which goes deepest into life, the

medium is necessarily inadequate. The artist fashions his work in a

sublime despair as he feels how little of the mighty meaning within

him he is able to convey. In the greatest works rightly seen the

medium becomes transparent. Within the Sistine Chapel the visitor,

when once he has yielded to the illusion, is not conscious of plaster

surface and pigment; indeed, he hardly sees color and design as such

at all; through them he looks into the immensity of heaven, peopled

with gods and godlike men. Consummate acting is that which makes

the spectator forget that it is acting. The part and the player become

one. The actor, in himself and in the words he utters, is the

unregarded vehicle of the dramatist's idea. In a play like Ibsen's

"Ghosts," the stage, the actors, the dialogue merge and fall away,

and the overwhelming meaning stands revealed in its complete

intensity. As the play opens, it cuts out a segment from the chaos of

human life; step by step it excludes all that is unessential, stroke by

stroke with an inevitableness that is crushing, it converges to the

great one-thing that the dramatist wanted to say, until at the end the

spectator, conscious no longer of the medium but only of the idea

and all-resolving emotion, bows down before its overmastering

force with the cry, "What a _mind_ is there!"

In the art which most completely achieves expression the medium is

not perceived as distinct from the emotion of which the medium is

the embodiment. In order to render expressive the material

employed in its service, art seeks constantly to identify means and

end, to make the form one with the content. The wayfarer out of his

need of shelter built a hut, using the material which chance gave into

his hand and shaping his design according to his resources; the

purpose of his work was not the hut itself but shelter. So the artist in

any form is impelled to creation by his need of expression; the thing

which he creates is not the purpose and end of his effort, but only

the means. Each art has its special medium, and each medium has its

peculiar sensuous charm and its own kind of expressiveness. This

power of sensuous delight is incidental to the real beauty of the

work; and that beauty is the message the work is framed to convey

to the spirit. In the individual work, the inspiring and shaping idea

seeks so to fuse its material that we feel the idea could not have been

phrased in any other way as we surrender to its ultimate appeal,--the

sum of the emotional content which gave it birth and in which it

reaches its fulfillment.

V

The Gate of Appreciation: Studies in the Relation of Art to Life · 第 12 / 23 题