ECONOMIC GEOLOGY.

NOTE.--The location of the coal-fields and collieries mentioned in

the following pages may be seen on an accompanying map.

Under the head of Economic Geology, I shall describe with more detail

the mineral beds which have a commercial value, and in the following

order:--I. Coal; II. Iron Ore; III. Granite, Limestone, and Marble; IV.

Precious and Base Metals.

[Sidenote: Thickness of the Coal Measures.]

I. COAL.--The thickness of the Coal Measures of the Puget Sound basin is

estimated by Bailey Willis at something like 14,000 feet, though he

admits the obvious possibility of error in the calculation by reason of

undiscovered faults. We may fairly expect them, however, to be thicker

than the same group in the Rocky Mountains, which measure about 9,000

feet. As heretofore remarked, the sediments become thinner from west to

east. Of course, the maximum thickness is not to be expected in every

locality. Mr. Willis's estimate was made in the Wilkeson and Green River

fields, and really did not reach the limit of the coal-bearing rocks.

The coal rocks of the Cedar River and Snoqualmie basin have never, so

far as I know, been estimated, but probably this group is equal in

thickness to that of any other part of the field. The difficulty of

measurement arises from the numerous fractures and changes of strike

which exist.

[Sidenote: Fifteen workable seams.]

The number of distinct workable seams of coal of three feet and upwards,

belonging to the measures, may safely be put down at not less than

fifteen.

[Sidenote: Different kinds of coal described.]

Before considering the quality of these coals, I will, for better

understanding, make some prefatory statements in regard to the character

of coals generally. Charcoal has greater purity than mineral coals

usually have, because there is nothing in the charcoal except what

naturally belongs to the woody matter. Mineral coal, however, having

been buried in water, mud, and sand, must, almost of necessity, have

some mixture of foreign matter, either slate, which is simply hardened

mud; silica, which may have been derived from sand; iron and sulphur,

some of which may have been in the wood, but most of it, probably,

introduced in solutions; to which should be added, unexpelled oxygen,

which is not only useless as fuel, but which combines with a portion of

the contained hydrogen, and forms water in the substance of the coal.

The proportion of ash in coals of the same class is usually determined

by the amount of slate in the coal, in addition to the mineral matter

which belonged originally to the vegetable material from which the coal

was formed. In the pure state, the proportion of ash increases as the

transformation of woody fibre goes on from peat to anthracite.

[Sidenote: The chemical changes in coal beds.]

It is worth while to note what are the changes which take place in the

vegetable matter during the process. It may be described in a word as a

progressive loss of oxygen, and by this loss the coal becomes richer,

for the reason just given. The deoxidizing process is carried on by

means of chemical changes in the substance of the coaly matter. The

oxygen combining with a certain proportion of the carbon, forms carbon

di-oxide, or carbonic acid gas; and a certain other portion, combining

with hydrogen, forms water. Both of these are volatile in their

character, and gradually escape. Another loss is effected by the

combination of hydrogen and carbon, forming marsh gas. We have deadly

proof that these combinations are in progress in all coal mines by the

occurrence of "choke-damp" and "fire-damp," which are the miners' names

for these gases.

[Sidenote: Deficient nomenclature.]

Unfortunately, we have no settled nomenclature for the varieties of

coal, excepting the broad names lignite or brown coal, bituminous coal,

and anthracite. Even the term "bituminous" is scientifically inaccurate,

there being, in fact, no bitumen in any coal. But it is applied to such

coals as contain more oxygen and volatile combustible matter and water

than anthracite, and less of these elements than lignite. The term

lignite is made to include a great variety of substances, covering the

lignites of the Juro-Trias of James River (Dutch Gap), which retain not

only the structure, but the appearance of decaying wood; the lignites of

the State of Mississippi, which are of the same geologic age as those of

the Rocky Mountains, but which, owing to their watery and crumbly

character, are unfit for market; the lignites of the Grand and Moreau

rivers of Dakota, which are reported to have no commercial value; the

lignites of Bozeman, Montana, which are really valuable, but soon break

down into chips and grits; the lignites of Green River, Wyoming, which

are firm, bright, lump coals; and the lignites of King County,

Washington Territory, many of which are hard, bright, steam and shipping

coals. And when brought to the laboratory, it is found that chemically

these lignites vary even more than they do optically.

[Sidenote: Lignite an unsuitable name for the coals of Washington

Territory.]

This want of a varied nomenclature is to be regretted, because it

sometimes handicaps a good coal with an inferior name. It is only of

late that the Laramie or Cretaceous coals of Washington Territory have

been divided into lignites, bituminous coals, and anthracites. These

grade into each other so insensibly that it would be impossible to

classify them sharply. None of the lignites which I saw were as low in

grade as the typical lignite. The woody structure was quite discernible

in some samples of the Franklin coal, and less in the Newcastle and

Green River; but in respect to the two latter, I could not with the

naked eye discern more of the woody structure than I have seen in some

of the West Virginia coals, which belong to the Carboniferous period. I

sat by fires of Newcastle and neighboring coals for a month, and

observed no unusual amount of smoke, and no peculiar odor. By analysis,

these coals show a larger percentage of oxygen than the typical

bituminous coal, but decidedly less than is found in the brown coal of

Germany, or in some of the lignites of Montana. They need a new name.

Their heating power is not so great as that of the bituminous coals of

the same region. Their streak and powder are less black, and their

fracture more conchoidal, but not decidedly so.

The bituminous coals have the usual cubical fracture. The Wilkeson

readily breaks down into small cubes. The lignites are black and

lustrous. They come out as lumpy as ordinary coal, and, when exposed to

weather, do not break up into powder and grits like ordinary lignite.

This is true, at least, of the Newcastle coal.

[Sidenote: The coking quality not general in these coals, but found in

some.]

The coking quality of these coals cannot be determined by calculating

the proportion between the fixed carbon and the volatile, combustible

matter. I am not sure that Professor Fraser's fuel ratio tables are a

safe guide in any case. So far as now known, only a few of the

Washington Territory coals can be made into good coke. On this point,

however, we have only laboratory and rough field tests, excepting at the

Wilkeson mines, where twenty-five ovens were turning out a superior

quality of coke, as proved by every test save the use of it in high

furnace stacks, in which there had been no opportunity for trial. It is

claimed by many persons that seams on Green River, Skagit, Yakima, and

Snoqualmie will furnish good coking coal. The coal on Snoqualmie

Mountain, near Hop Ranch, has not been studied, but it certainly has the

external characteristics of good coking coal, and Mr. Peter Kirke made a

rough trial of it in an earth-pit with decidedly encouraging results.

Somewhat similar coal is found on Raging River, but where opened, so

much slate was interleaved with the coal that washing would be necessary

before use. More will be said hereafter with regard to these coals; but

the remark may be repeated here in respect to the entire Puget Sound

basin, that much additional examination is necessary before its coals

will be fully understood. The variations in character of these are not

owing entirely, or even chiefly, to their relative ages, but also to the

conditions to which they have been subjected, especially in respect to

heat. This metamorphic agency has acted not only in the body of the

Cascade Mountains, but all through the coal-fields, where faults,

flexures, and intrusive rocks have occasioned changes in the original

condition of the coal-beds, giving results along the whole scale of

metamorphism from lignite to anthracite.

[Sidenote: Analyses of Washington Territory coals.]

I here introduce (on the opposite page) a table of analyses made in

Washington City from representative samples of Washington Territory

coals and lignites selected by Mr. Bailey Willis during the examination

which he made of this field for the Census Bureau, and found in Vol. XV.

of the Census Reports.

A Report on Washington Territory · 第 84 / 121 题