As a matter of fact the whole truth has never been told of the real

conditions existing in the mines of West Virginia. One of the most

illuminating pieces of testimony available to the non-partisan

investigator is that of former Governor W. M. O. Dawson. Governor Dawson

sent a special message--a rare document and hard to find now--to the

legislature of 1907. Three cases of peonage in lumber camps had been

called to his attention by Secretary of State Elihu Root at the request

of the Italian ambassador. In his message Governor Dawson declared

without equivocation that a system of peonage existed under the guard

system. One of these cases resulted in what he called a "wanton murder"

as a result of a controversy as to whether the murdered man owed $1.50

for the railway fare of his son. The man was killed by a guard. The

governor goes on:

"The use of guards in this state is not restricted to cases like

these under investigation. They are used at some of the collieries

to protect the property of owners, to prevent trespassing, and

especially to prevent labor agitators and organizers of the miners'

union from gaining access to the miners.... Many outrages have been

committed by these guards, many of whom appear to be vicious and

dare devil men who seem to aim to add to their viciousness by

bulldozing and terrorizing people. It is submitted in all candor

that it is not to the best interests of the owners of these

collieries to employ such lawless men or to justify the outrageous

acts committed by them.

"In certain parts of the state miners are oppressed and wronged.

They are compelled to work in ill-ventilated and otherwise unfit

mines. They are cheated in the payment of the compensation for

their labor. They work on the condition that they receive so much

per ton for the coal mined by them, the coal is not weighed but is

calculated by the mine car. These cars, at least in some of the

collieries, are rated at a capacity of two and one half tons,

whereas they often have a capacity of four tons and in some cases

even up to six tons, but the miner is paid for only two and a half

tons, for all above that he mines, he gets no pay whatever. This is

robbery of the poor and oppression of the weak. At some of the

stores conducted by the collieries the miners are charged

extortionate prices for merchandise. This is likewise robbery of

the poor and oppression of the weak."

_Mother Jones_

The developments of the winter have been under the regime of a third

governor, who came to the state house at a season when part of the

commonwealth was under martial law. In March came the trials of a number

of the strikers and their sympathizers--approximately fifty--by a

military court on charges of inciting to riot, conspiracy to murder and

conspiracy to destroy property. Among those in prison is Mother Jones,

the "Stormy Petrel of Labor" who is always present in big labor

disturbances, especially those of the miners and the railroad men. She

has given the best part of her life to the cause of laboring men and

they adore her.

This old woman, more than 80 years of age, was in the mines when I went

there and I got to know her well. She passed the word along to the men

that I was "all right" and reticent as they are to strangers, they told

me their side of the case without reservation.

I have been with Mother Jones when she was compelled "to walk the

creek," having been forbidden to go upon the footpaths that happened to

be upon the property of the companies and denied even the privilege of

walking along the railroad track although hundreds of miners and others

were walking on it at the time. She was compelled to keep to the county

road although it was in the bed of the creek and the water was over her

ankles. I protested to the chief of the guards saying that no matter

what her attitude might be, no matter how much she might be hated, that

she was an old woman and common humanity would dictate that she be not

ill treated. I was told that she was an old "she-devil" and that she

would receive no "courtesies" there, that she was responsible for all

the trouble that had occurred and that she would receive no

consideration from the companies.

I was with her when she was denied "the privilege" of going up the

foot-way to the house of one of the miners in order to get a cup of tea.

It was then afternoon, she had walked several miles and was faint,

having had nothing to eat since an early breakfast. But that did not

shut her mouth. She made the speech she had arranged to make to the men

who had gathered to hear her although they had to line up on each side

of the roadway to avoid "obstructing the highway," a highway that was

almost impassable to a wheeled vehicle and on which there was no travel.

And in that speech she counseled moderation, told the men to keep

strictly within the law and to protect the company's property instead of

doing anything to injure it.

I had several long talks with her. When she speaks to the miners she

talks in their own vernacular and occasionally swears. She was a normal

school teacher in her early days, and in her talks with me in the home

of one of her friends in the "free town" of Eskdale, she used the

language of the cultured woman. And this is the old woman whom nearly

all the operators in the non-union fields fear, and whose coming among

their workers they dread more than the coming of a pestilence. They now

have her safely in jail.

When I left the field[11] the conflict was still on. It seemed likely to

continue until one side or the other gave in. The presence of the

military could only bring about a peace that is temporary. Having held

out through the winter, the miners were preparing to hold out through

the spring and summer and autumn if necessary, and the United Mine

Workers of America were preparing to back them up with all the resources

of the national organization.

[11] Since the writer left the district an unavailing effort was made to

secure from the civil courts an order restraining the military

commission from conducting the trials of those held on charges of

participation in various deeds of violence in connection with the

strike. Later, however, Governor Hatfield who, as head of the military

forces of the state, has the power to review the acts of the military

commission, discharged from custody a majority of those held.

Recently negotiations have been carried on between the miners' union and

one of the large companies involved in the strike with the result that

there is a possibility of a settlement being effected in that quarter,

though the matter remains _in statu quo_ until the return from the

tropics of the president of the company. Recently some of the troops

have been withdrawn from the strike zone, though martial law is still in

force.

[Illustration: _Courtesy of the Coal Age_

MILITIAMEN ESCORTING PRISONERS TO COURT MARTIAL]

SOCIAL FORCES

By EDWARD T. DEVINE

CONSTRUCTIVE RELIGION

Greed, selfishness, privilege, injustice, exploitation, ignorance, and

neglect are the seven deadly sins of modern civilization. These evils

are alike in this, that they all have their roots in defective or

abnormally developed character. Weakness and pathological strength are

their opposite but closely related and interdependent poles.

Revolution will not exterminate them, except that revolution within the

soul of man which transforms weakness and moral disease into health and

normal vigor; which eats away the abnormal excrescence of harmful

qualities and transforms the monster into a sane and self-controlled

individual.

Laws will not of themselves exterminate the least of the social evils,

save as they correspond to a previous clear recognition of their wisdom

and justice in the free minds of citizens. If graft and privilege

express the habitual manner of doing business, the natural mental

reaction of the average man of the community, then it will be true, as

an investigating committee has said, that there is no virtue in the

legislative printing press.

Philanthropy is no cure for the evils which cause crime, poverty,

squalor, and degeneracy. It is a necessary means of dealing with certain

definite conditions, but those conditions are symptoms of ulterior

maladies which the charitable relation does not reach. Neither

alms-giving nor preventive measures touch the real sources of

regeneration and health.

Education, in the specific sense of preparation for efficient work and

the development of the mental powers, such education as by mutual

consent we expect from our public schools, does not begin early enough,

or last long enough, or go far enough into the fields of personal

habits, ideals, and motives to guard even against ignorance, at least

that kind of wilful and appalling ignorance which prevents half the

world from knowing how the other half lives, even when the facts are

spread abroad equally in official reports and in popular literature;

that kind of ignorance which blinds the eyes of the more favored of

fortune and blasts the tender shoots of altruism which their hearts here

and there put forth. If education cannot prevent even ignorance of this

kind how much less can it be regarded as a remedy for deliberate

exploitation and conscienceless greed.

If neither revolution nor laws nor yet formal education can cure these

root evils, is there no cure? There is one potent, wholly efficacious

cure, and that is such teaching and such an experience as will supplant

selfishness and greed by generosity and compassion, the desire for

privilege by the desire for equal opportunity, the instinct of injustice

by the passion for justice, the tendency to exploit by the tendency to

nobly serve, ignorance and neglect by a clear-eyed and persistent

determination to know and understand and to act on that knowledge and

understanding. This teaching, wherever it is carried on and in whatever

name, is essentially religious teaching, and this experience, seizing

upon the individual, is nothing else than a religious conversion. This

is not to distort words from their established and usual meaning but

only to apply them as they must be applied.

No rich and educated Jew can justly claim a share in the glorious

traditions of his religious faith if he oppresses the poor and crushes

the needy; if, lying upon beds of ivory, inventing instruments of music,

drinking wine in bowls, and anointing himself with the chief ointments,

he is not grieved for the afflictions of Joseph, if he afflicts the

just, or takes a bribe, or turns aside the poor in the gate from their

right. The afflictions of Joseph are different in these days, the form

of bribery has changed, the rights of the poor from which they are

turned aside are not precisely those which the prophet Amos had in mind;

but the teachings remain, and the curse upon those who "rejoice in a

thing of nought" may not unprofitably ring in the ears of Jews and

Christians with all the old time authority and effect.

But how about the position of the prosperous and influential Christians

professing a law of love, the son-ship of all men to a common Father, a

gospel of good will embracing justice and implying obligations

stretching in all directions infinitely beyond justice, but never

denying it in the least iota? If this profession is not arrant hypocrisy

or pure self-delusion, the faith which he holds will instantly expel

the very evils from which we suffer, and nothing else except such faith

will expel them. Religion goes to the very roots of character, cleansing

the evil nature, revealing new motives, illuminating the mind,

trans-valuing values, strengthening the will, lessening the power of

temptations, setting the feet on safe paths, giving a new meaning to

common experiences and a new zest to life.

The question remains whether this kind of constructive religion, this

vital, living and vibrant faith, is to be found today in the churches

and synagogues, or whether it has departed from its ancient altars,

perhaps to reappear in strange disguises in the labor movement, in art

or poetry or philosophy, or among humble people who do not have the

means as yet of expressing the new impulses.

It is a grave question--for the churches. One interesting indication

that it is to be answered in favor of the continued claim of the

existing religious bodies to represent the main current of flowing

religious faith, work, and thought is to be found in a new journal which

appeared on the news-stands in March with the captivating title _The

Constructive Quarterly_. Silas McBee, former editor of the _Churchman_,

is its editor, but it is to have no "editorial pronouncements."

What is distinctive about this new periodical is that it is to work for

a better understanding among the various communions of Christendom,

building on what the churches are actually believing, doing, and

thinking. It is not seeking neutral territory where courtesy and

diplomacy would tend to avoid issues and round off the sharp edges of

truth and conviction, but rather common ground where loyalty to

conviction will be secure from the tendency to mere compromise and to

superficial and artificial comprehension. In the first number there is a

striking array of able articles from Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox,

Evangelical Protestants, from Europeans and Americans, clergymen and

laymen. It will be difficult to maintain so high a standard; but the

idea is an inspiring one and deserves to succeed.

The tragedy of ecclesiastical history in all ages is the spilling of

blood and treasure by the churches in warfare against other forms of

faith. It is true that the decay of religious controversy has usually

meant a decay of interest in religion. A writer in the _Quarterly_

quotes Tennyson as having said, "You must choose in religion between

bigotry and flabbiness." What the present venture is in some measure to

test is the possibility of laying aside hostility while yet maintaining

_esprit de corps_, to act in the spirit of Von Moltke's dictum, "March

apart, strike together!"

The success of the effort will depend on the clear perception of the

enemies against which the allied forces of religion are to strike, or

dropping the figure, on the concentration of effort on the positive

results which the forces of organized religion are to seek to secure in

the social order. These lie partly at least, avoiding dogmatic

exaggeration, in those social relations in which the evil tendencies to

which we have referred are so apparent. The religion which is

constructive is one which makes men unwilling to exploit the vices or

weaknesses of their fellow men, and at the same time makes the other men

unexploitable, which destroys privilege through just laws, impartially

enforced, and upheld by enlightened public opinion, which dispels

ignorance by full and exact knowledge bearing fruit in sound measures of

social reform, which protects the sub-normal and emancipates the

handicapped from their limitations, which permeates education, business,

politics, and eventually the entire social life.

There may be other tests of true religion, but these are concrete, easy

to understand and to apply. They have ancient and sufficient sanction.

They are unsectarian and non-controversial.

STRANGE INCENSE

CARY F. JACOB

_A tiny, tangled head bent down

Within a city's gutter--

A laughing face of tan and brown

Amid the rubbish of the town._

_Mud-pies and broken glass all day

Bring fairyland from far away

To thee, sweet innocence, at play._

_But mud-pies blacken; glass gives pain,

And laughing eyes are turned to gain

'Mid cold and hunger, snow and rain._

_God shield thee, tangled head bent down

Within a city's gutter!

Poor lily of the noisome town!

Strange incense, shed o'er stranger ground!_

* * * * *

Transcriber's Notes:

Simple typographical and spelling errors were corrected.

Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant

preference was found in this work; otherwise they were not changed.

The Survey, Volume 30, Number 1, April 5, 1913 · 第 9 / 9 段