_"The article may seem unduly to favor the miners," wrote the Baltimore

Sun man in sending it in. "I went to West Virginia absolutely

unprejudiced, with the idea of telling the truth about the situation. I

found conditions I did not believe could exist in America, and I am no

novice in the newspaper game, having seen some pretty raw things in my

time. I told the truth about them, and am afraid I have gotten myself

disliked."_

_The fairness of the article is disputed by Neil Robinson, secretary of

the West Virginia Mining Association. His protest is published in the

forepart of the magazine._--Ed.]

For nearly a year a state of turmoil amounting in practical effects to a

civil war has existed in the coal fields of West Virginia. The situation

centers in the Kanawha Valley, hardly more than twenty miles from

Charleston, the capital of the state.

The military power of the state has been used with only temporary

effect; martial law has been declared and continues in force; the

governor of the state has been defied and denounced from the state house

steps and within his hearing; men and women have been thrown into prison

and are still there for espousing the cause of the miners, and the grim

hillsides of the canons in which the mines are situated are dotted with

the graves of men who have been arrayed against one another in this

conflict between capital and labor.

Of course, there have been errors and excesses on both sides. The men in

the mines are not angels by any means, and neither are the men for whose

profit they work. But there has been no profit on either side for the

last year and it looks as if there would be none for a long time to

come. The men of both sides are pretty good fellows away from the mines

and the subject of mining; on the matter of mining, they show the

obstinacy of men who look at a proposition from but one point of view,

who see no justification of the position of those who oppose them and

who seem to have lost absolutely the sense of proportion.

If the efforts made by William B. Wilson, former Congressman from

Pennsylvania and former secretary-treasurer of the United Mine Workers

of America, to have a federal investigation of the situation early in

the struggle, had been successful, the whole matter might have been

settled long since. But his resolution calling for a congressional

investigation was buried at the last session of Congress and was never

resurrected.

Wilson charged that a condition of peonage existed in the mines and that

men were held there by force and compelled to work against their will.

The coal operators denied this vehemently, at the same time fighting

bitterly a federal inquiry. Evidence I was able to gather on a trip of

investigation to the mines convinced me that a form of peonage does, or

did, exist; that the miners were oppressed; that the rights guaranteed

under the constitution were denied them; that the protection of the law

of the state was withheld from them and the law openly defied and

ignored by the coal operators. These things were done, apparently, not

because the operators were cruel, but--the old story of

dividends--because they thought it necessary that a balance be shown on

the right side of the ledger, and because competitive conditions in the

coal fields were such that more of this balance had to be produced from

the men themselves than from the bleak hills in which they toil.

The investigation is bound to come. Wilson is a cabinet member in the

new administration, and could of his own volition carry it on under the

broad terms of the act creating the new federal Department of Labor. But

there is another agency which may look into the situation. When fellow

members of the lower house balked Congressman Wilson's proposal, he

interested Senator Borah of Idaho and the latter promised to introduce

into the Senate, at the coming special session, a resolution calling for

a full and complete investigation, by a committee of the Senate, of the

whole situation in the West Virginia coal mines, including the question

of peonage, the use of mine guards and other means of oppression. This

would be a Senate resolution, it would not have to be concurred in by

the House of Representatives, and it is understood that Secretary Wilson

has votes enough pledged to pass it.

Even the close of the strike which has been rumored the past fortnight

would not make such a fundamental inquiry during the spring and summer

inopportune, but rather a measure of precaution in anticipation of

future labor conflicts in the region. The fact that such an inquiry has

been actively contemplated is not generally known; information about it

has not been published in the newspapers, but has been given me for use

in THE SURVEY.

_Backward View of the Trouble_

The Kanawha trouble dates back about ten years. At that time the miners'

condition was good, as things go for men in the coal fields, and the

miners along Cabin Creek were organized. An ill-advised strike was

called then, and it resulted in a disastrous defeat for the miners. This

strike was ordered by officials of the union against the desire of the

miners directly affected and it is charged by Cabin Creek miners that it

was declared in the interest of the Ohio operators who desired to

cripple their West Virginia competitors. Some of these operators have

since admitted that they helped finance the strike. As long as the

trouble lasted, operators in competitive fields could gobble the

business of operators whose plants were shut down. Of course, after the

men had been beaten and the strike broken and non-union conditions and

wage scales went into effect, the competition was more bitter than it

had been before, yet the pickings were good while they lasted. That,

however, is all ancient history.

Ever since the strike of a decade ago the men on Cabin Creek have been

restless. Conditions were burdensome although they were not so bad on

Paint Creek which was organized. The operators were out after business

and they cut prices on coal to the limit in order to meet the

competition of Illinois, Ohio and western Pennsylvania operators and get

a share of the "lake trade." For the driving force behind this civil war

in the hills of West Virginia is to be found in the coal bins of 10,000

factories of the Middle West and beyond whose managers and workmen know

little or nothing of the struggle.

By "lake trade" is meant the coal that goes to ports on Lake Erie for

transportation by steamer and barge to Detroit and as far as Duluth and

Superior for distribution throughout the Northwest. All the trade that

passes over the lakes, no matter what its ultimate destination, is known

as the "lake trade." The Pittsburgh operators have held that the opening

of the West Virginia fields was an economic blunder, that the lake

demand was no greater than Pittsburgh and Ohio could supply, and that it

was a mistake for the West Virginia operators to enter that field. The

latter took the position that they had the coal, and did not propose to

let it remain undeveloped because it would interfere with the market of

the operators of other fields. They would mine their coal and would sell

it wherever they could, and if they could grab a big share of the lake

trade they proposed to do it. It has been a battle of millions.

To strengthen their position the Pennsylvania operators have bought

large blocks of West Virginia coal lands. The Lackawanna Coal Company

has, for example, secured control of the principal operations on Paint

Creek.

The operators in the Ohio, Illinois, and most of the Pennsylvania

fields, get out their coal under terms as to hours and wages imposed by

their agreements with the United Mine Workers. In order to be in a

position to meet the growing competition of the West Virginia fields on

an even footing in the matter of labor, it is an open secret, that they

have given aid and comfort to the union in the effort to organize the

West Virginia field. They have been fighting on the other hand for a

reduction in their own freight rates or an increase in those of their

West Virginia competitors, they did not care which, as the consumer

finally pays the bill. Until a comparatively recent time, the rate from

the Pittsburgh district to Ashtabula and Cleveland has been 88 cents a

ton, while to Toledo and Sandusky, the rates from the West Virginia

field have been 97 cents and $1.12 a ton.

Something more than a year ago the pressure on the railroads became so

great that a meeting of the officers of the coal carrying roads and the

operators from the Pittsburgh and the West Virginia districts was held

in New York in an effort to settle the difficulty. No agreement could be

reached and the roads, unable to resist the pressure of the Pittsburgh

operators advanced the rate from the West Virginia fields 9-1/4 cents,

making the differential in favor of the Pittsburgh field 18-1/4 instead

of 9 cents.

[Illustration: _Copyright by Underwood and Underwood._

CONFISCATED ARMS AND AMMUNITION

The revolvers and rifles were taken from both mine guards and strikers]

The West Virginia operators appealed to the Interstate Commerce

Commission for an investigation, and an order suspending the rate was

granted. Then John W. Boilleau, a big operator in Pennsylvania, demanded

a reduction of 50 or 55 cents a ton from the Pittsburgh district,

further complicating the situation. Early last year, the Interstate

Commerce Commission handed down a decision reducing the rate from the

Pittsburgh district 10 cents and held that the Chesapeake and Ohio and

the Kanawha and Michigan rates should remain as they had been but that

the Norfolk and Western rate might be increased. This decision resulted

in increasing the differential in favor of Pittsburgh to 19 cents.

With this handicap in freight rates, the operators on Paint and Cabin

creeks say that it is impossible for them to pay the union scale and

submit to union conditions and keep going. It is a fact that although

the average price of coal in West Virginia for 1911 was a cent above the

price in 1910, many coal companies failed. Some mines have been operated

by receivers while others have been closed down on the ground that coal

cannot be produced at the mouth of the mines and put on the cars at the

price it brings in the market. Others are just about coming out even

while some are making money.

_Profits from Mine or Men?_

The strikers answer by charging that the losses and difficulties

incident to competition are many of them paper losses and paper

difficulties, that the mines would pay well under union conditions and

rates of pay if the mines were not working on an inflated capitalization

and were not endeavoring to earn money on a lot of watered stock.

In one of the talks which I had with Neil Robinson, secretary of the

West Virginia Mining Association, he went into the cost of production

and told of the efforts of the Pittsburgh operators to shut the West

Virginia coals out of the lake trade. He produced the calculations of G.

W. Schleuderberg, general manager of the Pittsburgh Coal Company, which

were given in the lake rate cases before the Interstate Commerce

Commission, showing that the average cost of production in 52 mines,

including general office expenses, depreciation, royalty, fuel,

supplies, and labor, was 99.09 cents per ton of coal on cars.

As against this, he showed a generalized statement, which he said was

based on actual working conditions in the Kanawha splint coal mines

indicating a cost of 99.11 cents on cars, a difference of two hundredths

of a cent in favor of the Pittsburgh operators.

The Schleuderberg figures showed a total labor cost of 72.16 cents a

ton while Mr. Robinson's figures showed for the Kanawha fields a labor

cost of 65.66 cents a ton, a difference in favor of the Kanawha fields

of 6.5 cents, and if superintendence and certain other costs be

included, a cost of 63.78 cents, which is a per ton difference in favor

of the Kanawha fields of 3.38 cents. This would more than cover the

increase asked by the miners which is half of the Cleveland compromise

scale or approximately 2-1/2 cents a ton.

[Illustration: _Courtesy of the Coal Age_

ON GUARD

A Cabin Creek rifle-woman before her tent.]

Of course, there is the railroad differential in favor of Pittsburgh to

be considered. In spite of the differential of 9 cents against the West

Virginia field, which existed up to the time of the settlement of the

lake trade cases by the Interstate Commerce Commission, the West

Virginia operators shipped in 1910 to lake ports more than six million

tons of coal, a growth of over four million tons since 1906; or 125 per

cent and even with the differential spread to 19 cents, they are

shipping coal as rapidly as they can mine it.

The explanation of the Kanawa Valley miners is that in their efforts to

capture the Lake Trade the West Virginia operators in competing with the

Pittsburgh district operators have been selling coal at less than cost

and making their profits out of their men.

The miners told me that ever since the fight began their condition has

been becoming harder and harder to bear. One of the men, answering my

statement that the operators said they were barely meeting expenses

said: "Damn it, I know there is no money in coal at 80 cents at the

tipple; any fool knows that, but by God, they've got no right to take it

out of us."

And that in my judgment is about the truth of the situation. Or, as Neil

Robinson explained to me in all seriousness: "Labor is simply a pawn in

the game."

Yet the game has cost the state, the operators and the miners millions

of dollars and many lives, has caused untold hardship to women and their

children, has engendered a bitterness that a generation in time will not

heal and hatreds that will last a lifetime.

In making that statement, I am convinced that Mr. Robinson did not know

how it would sound to one who puts the well-being of men, women and

children above the necessity of capital for dividends. He was simply

stating a business fact. I had several talks with him in the course of

my stay in the mine region and found him a cultivated, courteous man. I

think I got his point of view which coincides with that of the operators

generally. They seem to look upon labor as material, to be bought as

cheaply as possible and to be utilized in the manner which will be most

profitable to the mine investments.

Whenever I went in to see him to discuss the situation he immediately

produced account books, and books of statistics and began giving me

figures. The whole case of the operators, he seemed to think, could be

shown by the books and the balance sheet. He told me of tonnage, cost of

production, railroad freight rates, yield on investment, the yield of

competitive fields and the cost of operation in those fields,

capitalization and rates of dividends. But of the human side, he had

substantially nothing to say. Of the outrages of the miners--and they

have been numerous--he spoke with bitterness, but of the outrages

committed upon them he was silent.

Of course, figures such as Mr. Robinson produced are important but they

are not everything. The trouble is that the operators do not seem to be

able to see beyond them into those desolate little cabins under the

everlasting hills, to the rights of men, to the causes that make for

anarchy--that have made for anarchy, in this very region.

_The State at Stake_

It is hard to tell just how many men have been out in recent months.

Five thousand would be a fair estimate. And remarkable as it is, these

men have been able to hold out through a winter--and winters are severe

in those West Virginia mountains--and they enter the spring and the long

season, when cold does not fight them from the ranks of their opponents,

full of cheer and determined to continue the industrial war in which

they have engaged.

It must be remembered that this fight is not simply one between miners

and operators on Paint and Cabin Creeks. It is localized there, but

every miner and every operator in the state is involved more or less

directly. It is really a fight for the unionizing of the entire coal

fields of West Virginia, now largely non union.

If the operators stamp out the effort to restore unionism on Paint and

Cabin Creeks and prevent its going further than it has already gone on

Coal River it will mean the checkmating of unionism in the coal fields

of the state. Fights will be made, one after another, in places where

the United Mine Workers have organizations and they will be broken up as

they were broken up on Cabin Creek ten years ago. Once broken, they will

not be permitted to be formed again.

If, on the other hand, the miners win, their organization will be pushed

first into one field, then into another, until the whole state shall

have been unionized. It will take them years to do this. This explains

the extreme bitterness of the present fight, each side practically

staking its all on this one throw. Of course, the operators do not admit

that they are battling to crush out unionism in the state and the

officials of the mine workers' organization do not talk much about

extending the fight to other fields if they win in this. That is their

purpose, nevertheless.

The miners are receiving assistance from other operators in non-union

parts of the state. All the resources of the United Mine Workers of

America are being thrown behind the miners. As explained to me by

perhaps the most prominent man in the organization a few days ago, there

is now no big fight on hand anywhere else in the country, and there has

been none for a year. This has enabled the mine workers to collect a big

fund and they are still collecting. The organization's war chest is kept

in good shape by contributions from every mining district in the nation

and all this will be poured into the Kanawha field if necessary. In

addition to this, the miners again have the sympathy, if not the active

co-operation, of the operators in the Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio

fields where the union scale is paid.

In fact, the operators in the fields which are organized look upon their

brothers who have been able to prevent the union getting a hold in their

operations very much as the union laborer looks upon the non-union

laborer, although the operator is not so frank in expressing his

opinion. He is perfectly willing to upset the labor conditions in his

competitors' operations and aid the laborers in making their fights. And

the operator in the unorganized field is perfectly willing to see his

competitors' fields organized to the limit.

The country in which this war between the miners and the coal companies

is taking place is as wild as any that lies out of doors. Cabin Creek

Junction is sixteen miles east of Charleston and Paint Creek Junction is

seven miles further east. On Cabin Creek the railroad runs south along

the bed of the creek sixteen miles to Kayford while on Paint Creek the

road extends for twenty-two miles. These creeks are little streams,

ordinarily, which sometimes reach the proportions of torrents, flowing

along the bases of the mountains. The elevation of the creek beds above

tide ranges from 800 to 1,000 feet, while the tops of the hills which

rise abruptly on both sides of each creek are from 1,000 to 1,500 feet

higher. The sides of these hills are so steep that only an experienced

mountaineer can climb them, yet here and there near the creek beds the

miners have raised little patches of corn and vegetables.

[Illustration: MOTHER JONES]

The workable veins of coal lie high up on the sides of these hills, and

from each mine mouth a track leads to the coal tipple below from which

the coal is dumped from the mine cars to the cars of the railroad which

runs beneath the tipple. Here and there at the base of either of these

ravines is a narrow strip of flat land, and on these flats, the mining

villages are located. At places the bottom of the ravine is so narrow

that there is not room for the railroad track, the creek bed and the

county road, so the road runs along the bed of the creek and is

impassable at times of high water and oftentimes in the winter.

It is estimated that before the strike began, there were approximately

10,000 men, women and children living along Cabin Creek and somewhat

more than half that number along Paint Creek. A train runs up each creek

in the morning and there is another in the afternoon and if you happen

to miss the afternoon train out there is no way out except to walk, and

walking is very difficult in that country.

[Illustration: MINERS' HOMES LEASED FROM MINE OWNERS

_Courtesy of the New York Sun_]

For that reason little real news of the exact condition of affairs has

reached the outside world. Newspaper men are decidedly unwelcome along

the creeks; that is, their presence is distasteful to the mine owners.

Few strangers had been allowed to enter the creeks for a long time prior

to the entry of the militia last summer, without explaining their

business to some man, and usually a man with a gun. Ordinarily a

stranger would not get beyond the junction of the main line and the

branch road. If the explanation of his business did not happen to be

satisfactory, he was told to get out. If he demurred or showed a

disposition to argue he was frequently beaten up. If he got up the line,

his chances of getting beaten up were largely increased. One labor

organizer told me that a couple of years ago he was pulled off a train

and kicked into insensibility by the mine guards and when he recovered

was made to "walk the creek" in water up to his waist because he had

gone up Cabin Creek to see what the labor conditions were.

_The Mine Guards_

These mine guards are an institution all along the creeks in the

non-union sections of the state. They are as a rule supplied by the

Baldwin-Felts Detective Agency of Roanoke and Bluefield. It is said the

total number in the mining regions of West Virginia reaches well up to

2,500. Ordinarily they are recruited from the country towns of Virginia

and West Virginia, preferably the towns in the hill country, and

frequently have been the "bad men" of the towns from which they came.

And these towns have produced some pretty hard characters. The ruffian

of the West Virginia town would not take off his hat to the desperado of

the wildest town of the wildest west.

These Baldwin guards who are engaged by the mining companies to do their

"rough work" take the place of the Pinkertons who formerly were used for

such work by the coal companies. Since the Homestead strike in the steel

mills years ago when the Pinkertons fired into the strikers and killed a

number of them, this class of business has gradually drifted away from

the Pinkertons and much of it has been acquired by the Baldwin-Felts

agency.

In explanation of the employment of these guards, the operators say that

their property must be guarded, that the state does not give them

sufficient protection. Men who do service as mine guards cannot be

expected to be "ladylike." They deal with desperate characters and are

constantly in peril. The guards act on the principle that they must

strike first if they are to strike at all, and evidence shows that they

have not the slightest hesitancy about striking first. The operators

also say that it is necessary to require explanations of strangers in

order to keep out labor agitators and to prevent the miners from being

annoyed and threatened by them.

No class of men on earth are more cordially hated by the miners than

these same mine guards who are engaged to "protect" them from annoyance

by outsiders. Before the state troops went into the region and took

their rifles away from them, the mine guards went about everywhere, gun

in hand, searching trains, halting strangers, ejecting undesirables,

turning miners out of their houses and doing whatever "rough work" the

companies felt they needed to have done. Stories of their brutality are

told on every hand along the creeks. Some are unquestionably

exaggerated, but the truth of many can be proved and has been proved.

The Survey, Volume 30, Number 1, April 5, 1913 · 第 7 / 9 段