IV

From the composition of the verses let us pass to the style. Baudelaire

intertwines his silken and golden threads with strong, rude hemp, as

in a cloth worked by Orientals, at the same time gorgeous and coarse,

where the most delicate ornamentations run in charming caprice on the

fine camel's-hair, or on a cloth coarse to the touch like the sail of

a boat. The most delicate, the most precious even, is hurled in with

savage brutalities; and, from the scented boudoir and voluptuously

languorous conversations, one falls into ignoble inns where drunkards,

mixing blood with wine, dispute at the point of their knives for some

Hélène from the streets.

"The Flowers of Evil" are the brightest gem in Baudelaire's crown. In

them he has given play to his originality, and shown that one is able,

after incalculable volumes of verse where every variety of subject

seems to be exhausted, to bring to light something new and unexpected,

without hauling down the sun and the stars, or making universal history

file past as in a German fresco.

But what has especially made his name famous is his translation of

Edgar Poe; for in France little is read of the poet except his prose,

and it is the feuilletons that make the poems known. Baudelaire has

almost naturalised for us this singular and rare individuality, so

pregnant, so exceptional, who at first rather scandalised than charmed

America. Not that his work is in any way morally shocking--he is,

on the contrary, of virginal and seraphic chastity; but because he

disturbed accepted principles and practical common sense, and, also,

because there was no criterion by which to judge him.

Edgar Poe had none of the American ideas on progress, perfectibility,

democratic institutions, and other subjects of declamation dear to

the Philistines of the two worlds. He was not a worshipper of the

god of gold; he loved poetry for itself and preferred beauty to

utility--enormous heresy! Still, he had the good fortune to write well

things that made the hair of fools in all countries stand on end. A

grave director of a review or journal--a friend of Poe, moreover, and

well-intentioned--avowed that it was difficult to employ him, and that

one was obliged to pay him less than others, because he wrote above the

heads of the vulgar--admirable reason!

The biographer of the author of the "Raven" and "Eureka," said that

Edgar Poe, if he had regulated his genius and applied his creative

powers in a way more appropriate to America, would have become a

money-making author; but he was undisciplined, worked only when he

liked, and on what subjects he pleased. His roving disposition made him

roll like a comet out of its orbit from Baltimore to New York, from New

York to Philadelphia, from Philadelphia to Boston or Richmond, without

being able to settle anywhere. In his moments of ennui, distress, or

breakdown, when to excessive excitement, caused by some feverish work,

succeeded that despondency known to authors, he drank brandy, a fault

for which he has been bitterly reproached by Americans, who, as every

one knows, are models of temperance.

He was not under any delusion as to the effects of this disastrous

vice, he who has written in the "Black Cat" this prophetic phrase:

"What illness is comparable to alcohol!" He drank without drunkenness,

just to forget, to find himself in a happy mood in regard to his

work, or even to end an intolerable life in evading the scandal of a

direct suicide. Briefly, one day, seized in the street by an attack

of delirium tremens, he was carried to the hospital where he died,

still young and with no signs of decaying power. The deplorable habit

had had no influence on his intellect or his manners, which remained

always those of an accomplished gentleman; nor on his beauty, which was

remarkable to the end.

We indicate but rapidly some traits of Edgar Poe, as we are not writing

his life. The American author held so high a place in the intellectual

esteem of Baudelaire that we must speak of him in a more or less

developed way, and give, if not an account of his life, at least of

his doctrines. Edgar Poe has certainly influenced Baudelaire, his

translator, especially during the latter part of his life, which was,

alas! so short.

"The Extraordinary Histories," "The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym,"

"The Tales of the Grotesque and Arabesque," "Eureka," have been

translated by Baudelaire with so exact a correspondence in style and

thought, a freedom so faithful yet so supple, that the translations

produce the effect of original work, and are almost perfect. "The

Extraordinary Histories" are preceded by a piece of high criticism,

in which the translator analyses the eccentric and novel talent of

Poe, which France, with her utter heedlessness of the originalities

of foreigners, ignored profoundly till Baudelaire revealed them. He

brought to bear upon this work, necessary to explain a nature so beyond

the vulgar idea, a metaphysical sagacity of the rarest delicacy. The

pages may be counted the most remarkable he has ever written.

Great excitement was created by these histories, so mathematically

fantastic, deduced in algebraical formulæ, and in which the expositions

resemble some judiciary led by the most subtle and perspicacious

magistrates.

"The Murders in the Rue Morgue," "The Purloined Letter," "The

Gold-Bug," enigmas more difficult to divine than those of the Sphinx,

and in which the interest, sustained to the very end, excites to

delirium the public, surfeited with romances and adventures. One feels

deeply for Auguste Dupin, with his strange, divinatory lucidity, who

seems to hold between his hands the threads, drawing one to the other,

of thoughts most opposed, and who arrives at his conclusions by

deductions of a marvellous correctness. One admires Legrand, cleverer

still at deciphering cryptograms than Claude Jacquet, employed by the

Ministry, who read to Desmarets, in the history of the "13," the letter

deciphered by Ferrango; and the result of this reading is the discovery

of the treasures of Captain Kidd! Every one will confess that he would

have had to be very clear-sighted to trace in the glimmer of the flame,

in the red characters on yellow parchment, the death's-head, the kid,

the lines and points, the cross, the tree and its branches, and to

guess where the corsair had buried the coffer full of diamonds, jewels,

watches, golden chains, ounces, doubloons, dollars, piastres, and money

from all countries, the discovery of which recompensed the sagacity

of Legrand. The "Pit and the Pendulum" caused terror equal to the

blackest inventions of Anne Radcliffe, of Lewis, and of the Rev. Father

Mathurin, while one gets giddy watching the tearing whirlpool of the

Maelstrom, colossal, funnel-like walls upon which ships run like pieces

of straw in a tempest.

"The Truth of the Case of M. Waldemar," shakes the nerves even of the

most robust, and the "Fall of the House of Usher" inspires profound

melancholy.

Imaginative natures were deeply touched by the faces of women, so

vaporous, transparent, romantically pale, and of almost spiritual

beauty, that the poet named Morelia, Ligeia, Lady Rowena, Trevanion,

de Tremaine, Lenore; but who are in reality only the incarnations under

different forms of a unique love surviving the death of the adored one.

Henceforth, in France, the name of Baudelaire is inseparable from that

of Edgar Poe, and the memory of the one immediately awakes thoughts

of the other. It seems sometimes that the ideas of the American were

really of French origin.

Baudelaire, like the greater number of the poets of his time, when

the Arts, less separated than they were formerly, mingled more one

with another and allowed of frequent transposition, had the taste for,

sentiment and knowledge of, painting. He wrote noteworthy articles

in the "Salon," and, amongst others, pamphlets on Delacroix, which

analysed with clear penetration and subtlety the nature of a great

romantic painter. He thought deeply, and we find, in some reflections

on Edgar Poe, this significant phrase: "Like our Delacroix, who has

raised his art to the height of great poetry, Edgar Poe likes to

place his subjects on violet and green backgrounds which reveal the

phosphorescence and the fragrance of the storm." How just is this

sentiment, so simply phrased, incidental to the passionate and feverish

colour of the painter! Delacroix, in effect, charmed Baudelaire by

the "maladie" even of his talent, so troubled, restless, nervous,

excitable, and so tormented with uneasiness, melancholy, febrile

ardour, convulsive efforts, and the vague dreams of modern times.

At one time, the realistic school believed it could monopolise

Baudelaire. Certain outrageously crude and truthful pictures in the

"Flowers of Evil," pictures in which the poet had not hesitated before

any ugliness, might have made some superficial minds think he leaned

towards that doctrine. They did not note that these pictures, so-called

real, were always ennobled by character, effect, or colour, and also

served as a contrast to the smooth and idealistic work. Baudelaire,

allowing himself to be drawn by these realists, visited their studios

and was to have written an article on Courbet, the painting-master

of Ornans, which, however, never appeared. Nevertheless, to one of

the later Salons, Fantin, in the odd frame where he united round

the medallion of Eugène Delacroix, like the supernumeraries of an

apotheosis, the painters, and writers known as realists, placed

Baudelaire in a corner of it with his serious look and ironical smile.

Certainly Baudelaire, as an admirer of Delacroix, had a right to be

there. But did he intellectually and sympathetically make a part of

this company, whose tendencies were not in accord with his aristocratic

tastes and aspirations towards the beautiful? In him, as we have

already said, the employment of trivial and natural ugliness was only a

sort of manifestation and protestation of horror; and we doubt if the

Venus de Courbet had ever much charm for him, the amateur of exquisite

elegance, refined mannerisms, and mannered evasions. Not that he was

incapable of admiring grandiose beauty; he who has written "La Géante"

ought to love "The Night" and the "Dawn," those magnificent colossal

females that Michelangelo has placed on the voluta of the tombs of the

Medici. Baudelaire had, moreover, metaphysical and philosophical tenets

which could not but alienate him from this school, to which he had no

pretext for attaching himself.

Far from being satisfied with reality, he sought diligently for

the bizarre, and, if he met with some singular, original type, he

followed it, studied it, and learnt how to find the end of the thread

on the bobbin and so to unravel it. Thus he was familiar with Guys,

a mysterious individual, who occupied his time in going to all the

odd corners of the universe where anything was taking place to obtain

sketches for English illustrated journals.

This Guys, whom we knew, was at one time a great traveller, a profound

and quick observer, and a perfect humorist. In the flash of an eye he

seized upon the characteristic side of men and things; in a few strokes

of the pencil he silhouetted them in his album, tracing the cursive

lines with the pen like a stenographer, and washing them over with a

flat tint to indicate the colour.

Guys was not what is properly called an artist, but he had the

particular gift of sketching the chief points of things rapidly. In a

flash of the eye, with an unequalled clear-sightedness, he disentangled

from all the traits--just the one. He placed it in prominence,

instinctively or designedly, rejecting the merely complementary parts.

No one was more reproachful than he of a pose, a "cassure," to use a

vulgar word which exactly expresses our thought, whether in a dandy

or in a _voyou_, in a great lady or in a daughter of the people. He

possessed in a rare degree the sense of modern corruptions, in high as

in low society, and he also culled, under the form of sketches, his

flowers of evil. No one could render like Guys the elegant slenderness

and sleekness of the race-horse, the dainty border on the skirt of a

little lady drawn by her ponies, the pose of the powdered and befurred

coachman on the box of a great chariot, with panels emblazoned with

the coat of arms, going to a "drawing-room" accompanied by three

footmen. He seems, in this style of drawing, fashionable and cursive,

consecrated to the scenes of high life, to have been the precursor

of the intelligent artists of "La Vie Parisienne," Marcelin, Hadol,

Morin, Crafty. But, if Guys expressed, according to the principles of

Brummel, dandyism and the allurements of the _duckery_, he excelled no

less in portraying the venal nymphs of Piccadilly and the Argyle Rooms

with their flash toilets and bold eyes. He was not afraid to occupy

himself with the deserted lanes, and to sketch there, under the light

of the moon or in the flickering glimmer of a gas-jet, a silhouette

of one of the spectres of pleasure who haunt the streets of London.

If he found himself in Paris, he followed the extreme fashions of

the wicked place and what is known as the "coqueterie du ruisseau."

You can imagine that Guys sought there only "character." It was his

passion, and he separated with astonishing certainty the picturesque

and singular side of the types from the allurements and costume of

the time. Talent of this kind could not but charm Baudelaire, who,

in effect, greatly esteemed Guys. We possessed about sixty drawings,

sketches, aquarelles of this humorist, and we gave some of them to the

poet. The present gave him great pleasure, and he carried it joyfully

away.

Certainly he realised all that was lacking in these rough sketches, to

which Guys himself attached not the slightest importance once they had

been traced on wood by the clever engravers of the "Illustrated London

News." But Baudelaire was struck by the spirit, the clear-sightedness,

and powerful observation they displayed, literary qualities graphically

translated in the language of line. He loved in these drawings

the complete absence of antiquity--that is to say, of classical

tradition--and the deep sentiment of what we call "decadence," for lack

of a word more expressive of our meaning. But we know what Baudelaire

understood by "decadence." Did he not say somewhere, à propos of these

literary distinctions:--"It seems to me that two women are presented

to me; the one a rustic matron, rude in health and virtue, without

allurement or worth; briefly, _owing nothing except to simple nature_;

the other, one of those beauties who dominate and fascinate the mind,

uniting, with her powerful and original charm, all the eloquence of the

toilet, mistress of her bearing, conscious and queen of herself, with a

voice of harmonious melody, and dreamy gaze allowed to travel whither

it will. My choice cannot be doubted, however many pedagogues reproach

me with lack of classical honour?"

This so original comprehension of modern beauty turns the question,

for it regards antique beauty as primitive, coarse, barbarous; a

paradoxical opinion undoubtedly, but one which can be upheld. Balzac

much preferred, to the Venus of Milo, a Parisienne _élégante_,

delicate, coquettish, draped in cashmere, going furtively on foot to

some rendezvous, her chantilly violet held to her nose, her head bent

in such a way as to display, between the brim of her hat and the last

fold of her shawl, the nape of a neck like a column of ivory, over

which some stray curl glistens in the sunlight. This has its charms;

but, for our part, we prefer the Venus of Milo.

With such ideas as these one can imagine that for some time Baudelaire

was inclined towards the realistic school of which Courbet is the god

and Manet the high-priest. But if certain sides of his nature were such

as could be satisfied by direct, and not traditional, representation

of ugliness, or at least of contemporary triviality, his aspirations

for Art, elegance, luxury, and beauty led him towards a superior

sphere. And Delacroix, with his febrile passion, his stormy colours,

his poetical melancholy, his palette of the setting sun, and his clever

expression of the decadence, was, and remained, his master by election.

We come now to a singular work of Baudelaire's, half translation, half

original, entitled, "The artificial Paradises, Opium and Hashish," and

at which we must pause; for it has contributed not a little to the

idea among the public, who are always happy in spreading unfavourable

reports of authors, that the writer of the "Flowers of Evil" was in the

habit of seeking inspiration in these stimulants. His death, following

upon a stroke of paralysis which made him powerless to express the

thoughts in his brain, only confirmed this belief. This paralysis, so

it was said, came undoubtedly from excess in hashish or opium, to which

the poet first gave himself up out of love of peculiarity, and then

from that fatal craving these drugs produce.

His illness was caused by nothing but the fatigue, ennui, sorrow, and

embarrassments inherent in literary people whose talent does not admit

of regular work, easy to sell, like journalism, and whose works, by

their originality, frighten the timid directors of reviews. Baudelaire

was as sober as all other workers, and, while admitting a taste for

the creation of an "artificial paradise," by means of some stimulant,

opium, hashish, wine, alcohol, or tobacco, seems to follow the nature

of man--since one finds it in all periods, in all conditions, in all

countries, barbarous or civilised--he saw in it the proof of original

perversity, a means of escaping _necessary_ sorrow, a satanical

suggestion for usurping, even in the present, the happiness reserved as

a recompense for resignation, virtue, and the persistent effort towards

the good and the beautiful. He thought that the devil said to the

eaters of hashish, the smokers of opium, as in the olden times to our

first parents, "If you taste of the fruit you will be as the gods," and

that he no more kept his word than he did to Adam and Eve; for, the

next day, the god, tempted, weakened, enervated, descended lower than

the beast and remained isolated in an immense space, having no other

resource to escape himself than by recourse to his poison, the doses of

which he gradually increases. That he once or twice tried hashish, as

a psychological experience, is possible and even probable; but he did

not make continuous use of it. This happiness, bought at the chemist's

and carried in the pocket, was repugnant to him, and he compared the

ecstasy that it produced to that of a maniac, for whom painted cloth

and coarse decorations replaced real furniture and the garden enriched

with living flowers. He came but rarely, and then only as a spectator,

to the séances at the Hôtel Pimodan, where our circle met to take the

"dawamesk"; séances that we have already described in the "Review of

the Two Worlds," under this title: "The Club of the Hashishins." After

some ten experiments we renounced once and for all this intoxicating

drug, not only because it made us ill physically, but also because the

true littérateur has need only of natural dreams, and he does not wish

his thoughts to be influenced by any outside agency.

Balzac came to one of these soirées, and Baudelaire related his visit

thus: "Balzac undoubtedly thought that there is no greater shame or

keener suffering than the abdication of the will. I saw him once at a

reunion when he was contemplating the prodigious effects of hashish.

He listened and questioned with attention and amusing vivacity. People

who knew him would guess that he was bound to be interested. The idea

shocked him in spite of himself. Some one presented him with the

dawamesk. He examined it, smelt it, and gave it back without touching

it. The struggle between his almost infantile curiosity and his

repugnance for the abdication, betrayed itself in his expressive face;

love of dignity prevailed. In effect, it is difficult to imagine the

theorist of 'will' the spiritual twin of Louis Lambert, consenting to

lose even a particle of this precious _substance_."

We were at the Hôtel Pimodan that evening, and therefore can relate

this little anecdote with perfect accuracy. Only, we would add this

characteristic detail: in giving back the spoonful of hashish that was

offered him, Balzac only said that the attempt would be useless, and

that hashish, he was sure, would have no action on his brain. That was

possible. This powerful brain, in which _will power_ was enthroned and

fortified by study, saturated with the subtle aroma of moka, and never

obscured by even a few bottles of the lightest of wine of Vouvray,

would perhaps have been capable of resisting the passing intoxication

of Indian hemp. For hashish, or dawamesk, we have forgotten to say,

is only a concoction of _cannabis indica_, mixed to a fleshy substance

with honey and pistachio-nuts, to give it the consistence of a paste or

preserve.

The analysis of hashish is medically very well done in the "Artificial

Paradises," and science is able to cull from them certain information;

for Baudelaire prided himself on his accuracy, and on no consideration

whatever would he slur over the least technical ornamentation of this

habit in which he had himself indulged. He specifies perfectly the real

character of the hallucinations produced by hashish, which of itself

creates nothing, simply developing the particular disposition of the

individual, exaggerating it to the very last degree. What one sees is

oneself, aggrandised, made sensitive, excited, immoderately outside

time and space, at one time real but soon deformed, accentuated,

enlarged, and in which each detail, with extreme intensity, becomes of

supernatural importance. Yet all this is easily understandable to the

hashish-eater, who divines the mysterious correspondence between the

often incongruous images. If you hear a piece of music which seems as

though performed by some celestial orchestra and a choir of seraphim,

compared to which the symphonies of Haydn, of Mozart, and of Beethoven

are no more than aggravating clatter, you may believe that it is

only that a hand has skimmed over the keys of a piano in some vague

prelude, or that a distant organ murmurs through the uproar of the

streets--a well-known piece from the opera. If your eyes are dazzled

by blinding lights, scintillations, and flames, assuredly it is only a

certain number of candles that burn in the torches and flambeaux.

As to the walls, ceasing to be opaque, sinking away into vaporous

perspective, deep, blue, like a window opening on the infinite, it

is but a glass mirror opposite the dreamer with its mingled and

transparently fantastic shadows. The nymphs, the goddesses, the

gracious apparitions, burlesque or terrible, come out of the pictures,

the tapestries, from the statues displaying their mythological nudity

in the niches, or from the grimacing china figures on the shelves.

It is the same with the olfactory ecstasies which transport one to the

paradises of perfumes, of marvellous flowers, balancing their calices

like censors which send out aromatic scents of penetrating subtlety,

recalling the memory of former lives, of balsamic and distant shores

and primitive loves in some Tahiti of a dream. One does not have to

seek far in the room for a pot of heliotrope or tuberose, a sachet

of Spanish leather or a cashmere shawl impregnated with patchouli,

negligently thrown over the arm of a chair.

It is understood, then, if one wishes to enjoy to the full the magic

of hashish, it is necessary to prepare in advance and furnish in some

way the _motif_ to its extravagant variations and disorderly fantasies.

It is important to be in a tranquil frame of mind and body, to have on

this day neither anxiety, duty, nor fixed time, and to find oneself in

such an apartment as Baudelaire and Edgar Poe loved, a room furnished

with poetical comfort, bizarre luxury, and mysterious elegance; a

private and hidden retreat which seems to await the beloved, the ideal

feminine face that Chateaubriand, in his noble language, calls the

"sylphide." In such circumstances, it is probable, and even almost

certain, that the naturally agreeable sensations turn into ravishing

blessings, ecstasies, ineffable pleasure, much superior to the coarse

joys promised to the faithful in the paradise of Mahomet, too easily

comparable to a seraglio. The green, red, and white houris coming out

from the hollow pearl that they inhabit and offering themselves to the

faithful, would appear as vulgar women compared to the nymphs, angels,

sylphides, perfumed vapours, ideal transparencies, forms of blue and

rose let loose on the disc of the sun and coming from the depths of

infinity with stellary transports, like the silver globules on gaseous

liquor, from the bottom of the crystal chalice, that the hashish-eater

sees in innumerable legions in the dreams he dreams while wide-awake.

Without these precautions the ecstasy is likely to turn

into-nightmare. Pleasure changes to suffering, joy to terror; a

terrible anguish seizes one by the heart and breaks one with its

fantastically enormous weight, as though the sphinx of the pyramids,

or the elephant of the king of Siam, had amused itself by flattening

one out. At other times an icy cold is felt making the victim seem like

marble up to the hips, like the king in the "Thousand and One Nights,"

half changed to a statue, whose wicked wife came every morning to beat

the still supple shoulders.

Baudelaire relates two or three hallucinations of men of different

temperaments, and one experienced by a woman in a small room hidden by

a gilt trellis and festooned with flowers, which is easily recognised

as the boudoir of the Hôtel Pimodan. He accompanies each vision with

an analytical and moral commentary, through which his unconquerable

repugnance for happiness obtained by such means is easily discernible.

He counts as nothing the consideration of the help that genius can draw

from the ideas suggested by intoxication of hashish. Firstly, these

ideas are not so beautiful as one imagines, their charm comes chiefly

from the extreme excitement in which the subject is. Then hashish,

which produces these ideas, destroys at the same time the power of

using them, for it reduces to nothing the will and plunges its victims

in an ennui in which the mind becomes incapable of any effort or

work, and from which it cannot escape except through the medium of

another dose. "Lastly," he adds, "admitting the minute hypothesis of

a temperament well enough balanced, strong enough to resist the evil

effects of this perfidious drug, it is necessary to consider another

fatal, terrible danger, which is that of habit. Those who have recourse

to a poison to make them think, will soon find that they cannot think

without poison. Picture to yourself the terrible fate of a man whose

paralysed imagination no longer fulfils its functions without the aid

of hashish or opium."

And, a little later, he makes his profession of faith in these noble

terms: "But man is not so lacking in honest means of inspiration that

he is obliged to invite the aid of the pharmacy or of sorcery; he has

no need to sell his soul to pay for the intoxicating caresses and

friendliness of the houris. What is the paradise that one buys at the

price of eternal salvation?"

There follows the painting of a sort of Olympus placed on the arduous

mount of spirituality where the muses of Raphael or of Mantegna,

under the guidance of Apollo, surround with their rhythmical choirs

the artist vowed to the cult of beauty and recompense him for his

continuous efforts. "Beneath him," continues the author, "at the foot

of the mountain, in the brambles and mud, the troop of men, the band of

helots, simulate the grimaces of enjoyment, and yell out if the bite

of poison is taken away from them; and the saddened poet says: 'These

unfortunate beings who have neither fasted nor prayed, and who have

refused to work out their own redemption, demand from black magic the

means of elevation, with a sudden stroke, to a supernatural existence.

Magic dupes them and kindles in them false happiness and light; whilst

we, poets and philosophers, who have given new life to our souls by

continued work and thought, by the assiduous exercise of the will and

permanent nobility of intention, we have created for our pleasure a

garden of real beauty. Confiding in the word which says faith can

remove mountains, we have accomplished the only miracle which God has

allowed.'"

After such an expression of faith it is difficult to believe that the

author of the "Flowers of Evil," in spite of his satanical leanings,

has often visited artificial paradises.

Succeeding the study on hashish is one on the subject of opium. But

here Baudelaire had for his guidance a book, singularly celebrated

in England, "Confessions of an English Opium Eater," by De Quincey,

a distinguished Hellenist, a leading writer, and a man of great

respectability, who has dared, with tragical candour, in a country the

most hardened by cant in the world, to avow his passion for opium, to

describe this passion, representing the phases, the intermittences,

the relapses, the combats, the enthusiasms, the prostrations, the

ecstasies and the phantasmagoria followed by inexpressible anguish. De

Quincey, incredible as it may seem, had, augmenting little by little

each dose, come to taking eight thousand drops a day. This, however,

did not prevent him from living till the age of seventy-five, for he

only died in the month of December 1859, making the doctors, to whom,

in a fit of _humour_, he had mockingly left his corpse as a subject for

scientific experiment, wait a long time. This habit did not prevent

him from publishing a crowd of literary and learned works in which

nothing announced the fatal influence which he himself described as

"the black idol." The _dénouement_ of the book leaves it understood

that only with superhuman efforts was the author brought to the state

of self-correction; but that could only have been a sacrifice to morals

and conventions, like the recompense of virtue and the punishment

of crime at the end of a melodrama, final impenitence being a bad

example. And De Quincey pretends that, after seventeen years of use

and eight years of abuse of opium, he has been able to renounce this

dangerous substance! It is unnecessary to discourage the _theriakis_

of good-will. But what of the love, however expressed, in the lyrical

invocation to the brown liqueur?

"O just, subtle, and all-conquering opium! thou who, to the hearts of

rich and poor alike, for the wounds that will never heal, and for the

pangs of grief that 'tempt the spirit to rebel' bringest an assuaging

balm;--eloquent opium! that with thy potent rhetoric stealest away the

purposes of wrath, pleadest effectually for relenting pity, and through

one night's heavenly sleep callest back to the guilty man the visions

of his infancy, and hands washed pure from blood;--O just and righteous

opium! that to the chancery of dreams summonest, for the triumphs of

despairing innocence, false witnesses; and confoundest perjury; and

dost reverse the sentences of unrighteous judges;--thou buildest upon

the bosom of darkness, out of the fantastic imagery of the brain,

cities and temples, beyond the art of Phidias and Praxiteles--beyond

the splendours of Babylon and Hekatompylos; and, 'from the anarchy of

dreaming sleep,' callest into sunny light the faces of long-buried

beauties, and the blessed household countenances, cleansed from the

'dishonours of the grave.' Thou only givest these gifts to man; and

thou hast the keys of Paradise, O just, subtle, and mighty opium!"

Baudelaire does not translate De Quincey's book entirely. He takes

from it the most salient parts, of which he writes in an analysis

intermingled with digressions and philosophical reflections, in such a

way that he presents the entire work in an abridgment. Nothing is more

curious than the biographical details which open these confessions.

They show the flight of the scholar to escape from the tyrannies of his

tutors, his miserable and starving life in the great desert of London,

his sojourn in the lodgings turned into a garret by the negligence

of the proprietor. We read of his liaison with a little half-idiot

servant, Ann, a poor child, sad violet of the highways, innocent and

virginal so far; his return in grace to his family and his becoming

possessed of a fortune, considerable enough to allow him to give

himself up entirely to his favourite studies in a charming cottage,

in company with a noble woman, whom this Orestes of opium called

his Electra. For, after his neuralgic pains, he had got into that

ineradicable habit of taking the poison of which he absorbed, without

disastrous results, the enormous quantity of forty grains a day.

To the most striking visions which shone with the blue and silver of

Paradise or Elysium succeeded others more sombre than Erebus, to which

one can apply the frightful lines of the poet:

"As when some great painter dips

His pen in gloom of earthquake and eclipse."

De Quincey, who was a precocious and distinguished humanist--he

knew both Greek and Latin at the age of ten--had always taken great

pleasure in reading Livy, and the words "Consul Romanus" resounded

in his ears like a magical and peremptorily irresistible formula.

These five syllables struck upon his ear like the blasts of trumpets,

sounding triumphal fanfares, and when, in his dreams, multitudes of

enemies struggled on a field of battle lighted with livid glimmerings,

with the rattling of guns and heavy tramping, like the surge of distant

waters, suddenly a mysterious voice would cry out these dominating

words: "Consul Romanus." A great silence would fall, oppressed by

anxious waiting, and the consul would appear mounted on a white horse,

in the midst of a great crowd, like the Marius of the "Batailles des

Cimbres" of Decamps, and, with a fatidical gesture, decide the victory.

At other times, people seen in reality would be mixed up in his dreams,

and would haunt them like obstinate spectres not to be chased away by

any formula of exorcism.

One day, in the year 1813, a Malay, of a yellow and bilious colour,

with sad, home-sick eyes, coming from London and seeking some haven,

knowing not one word of any European language, knocked to see if he

could rest a while, at the door of the cottage. Not wishing to fall

short in the eyes of his domestics and neighbours, De Quincey spoke

to him in Greek; the Asiatic replied in Malay, and his honour as a

linguist was saved. After having given him some money, the master of

the cottage, moved by the charity which causes a smoker to offer a

cigar to a poor devil whom he supposes has long been without tobacco,

gave the Malay a large piece of opium, which the man swallowed in a

mouthful. There was enough to kill seven or eight unaccustomed people,

but the yellow-skinned man was in the habit of taking it, for he went

away with signs of great satisfaction and gratitude. He was not seen

again, at least in the flesh, but he became one of the most assiduous

frequenters of De Quincey's visions. The Malay of the saffron face and

the strangely black eyes was a kind of genus of the extreme Orient who

had the keys of India, Japan, China, and other countries of repute in a

chimerical and impossible distance. As one obeys a guide whom one has

not called, but whom one must follow by one of those fatalities that a

dream admits of, De Quincey, in the steps of the Malay, plunged into

regions of fabulous antiquity and inexpressible strangeness that caused

him the profoundest terror. "I know not," says he in his "Confessions,"

"if others share my feelings on this point; but I have often thought

that, if I were compelled to forgo England, and to live in China, among

Chinese manners and methods and scenery, I should go mad.... A young

Chinese seems to me an antediluvian man renewed. ... In China, over

and above what it has in common with the rest of Southern Asia, I am

terrified by the modes of life, by the manners, by the barrier of utter

abhorrence placed between myself and _them_, by counter-sympathies

deeper than I can analyse. I could sooner live with lunatics, with

vermin, with crocodiles or snakes."

With malicious irony, the Malay, who seemed to understand the

repugnance of the opium-eater, took care to lead him to the centre

of great towns, to the ivory towers, to rivers full of junks crossed

by bridges in the form of dragons, to streets encumbered with an

innumerable population of baboons, lifting their heads with obliquely

set eyes, and moving their tails like rats, murmuring, with forced

reverence, complimentary mono-syllables.

The third and last part of the dreams of an opium-eater has a

lamentable title, which, however, is well justified, "Suspiria de

profundis." In one of these visions appeared three unforgettable

figures, mysteriously terrible like the Grecian "Moires" and the

"Mothers" of the second "Faust." These are the followers of Levana,

the austere goddess who takes up the new-born babe and perfects it by

sorrow. As there were three Graces, three Fates, three Furies, three

Muses in the primitive ages, so there were three goddesses of sorrow;

they are our Notre-Dame des Tristesses. The eldest of the three

sisters is called Mater lacrymarum, or Our Lady of Tears; the second

Mater suspiriorum, Our Lady of Sighs; the third and youngest, Mater

tenebrarum, Our Lady of Darkness, the most redoubtable of all, and of

whom the strongest cannot dream without a secret terror. These mournful

spectres do not speak the language of mortals; they weep, they sigh,

and make terrible gestures in the shadows. Thus they express their

unknown sorrows, their nameless anguish, the suggestions of solitary

despair, all that there is of suffering, bitterness, and sorrow in

the depths of the human soul. Man ought to take warning from these

initiators: "Thus will he see things that ought not to be seen, sights

which are abominable, and unspeakable secrets; thus will he read the

ancient truths, the sad, great, and terrible truths."

One can imagine that Baudelaire did not spare De Quincey the reproaches

he addressed to all those who sought to attain the supernatural by

material means; but, in regard to the beauty of the pictures painted by

the illustrious and poetical dreamer, he showed him great good will and

admiration.

About this time Baudelaire left Paris and pitched his tent in Brussels.

One must not presume that this journey was taken with any political

idea, but merely from the desire of a more tranquil and reposeful life,

far away from the distractions and excitements of Paris. This change

does not appear to have been a particularly profitable one for him. He

worked little at Brussels, and his papers contain only sketchy notes,

summaries almost hieroglyphical, which he alone could resolve. His

health, instead of improving, was impaired, more deeply than he himself

was aware, as the climate did not agree with him. The first symptoms

manifested themselves in a certain slowness of speech, and a more and

more marked hesitation in the choice of his words; but, as Baudelaire

often expressed himself in a solemn and sententious way, one did not

take much notice of this embarrassment in speech, which was the preface

to the terrible malady that carried him off.

The rumour of Baudelaire's death spread in Paris with the winged

rapidity of bad news, faster than an electric current along its wire.

Baudelaire was still living, but the news, though false, was only

premature; he could not recover from the attack. Brought back from

Brussels by his family and friends, he lived some months, unable to

speak, unable to write, as paralysis had broken the connecting thread

between thought and speech. _Thought_ lived in him always--one could

see that from the expression of his eyes; but it was a prisoner, and

dumb, without any means of communication, in the dungeon of clay which

would only open in the tomb. What good is it to go into the details of

this sad end? It is not a happy way to die; it is sorrowful, for the

survivors, to see so fine and fruitful an intelligence pass away, to

lose in a more and more deserted path of life a companion of youth.

Besides the "Flowers of Evil," translations of Edgar Poe, the

"Artificial Paradises," and art criticisms, Baudelaire left a little

book of "poems in prose" inserted at various periods in journals and

reviews, which soon became without interest for vulgar readers and

forced the poet, in his noble obstinacy, which would allow of no

concession, to take the series to a more enterprising or literary

paper. This is the first time that these pieces, scattered and

difficult to find, are bound in one volume, nor will they be the least

of the poet's titles to the regard of posterity.

In the short Preface addressed to Arsène Houssaye, which precedes the

"Petits poèmes en prose," Baudelaire relates how the idea of employing

this hybrid form, floating between verse and prose, came to him.

"I have a little confession to make to you. It was in turning over,

for the twentieth time, the famous 'Gaspard de la nuit' of Aloysius

Bertrand (a book known to me, to you, and several of our friends--has

it not the right to be called famous?) that the idea came to me to

attempt something analogous and to apply to the description of modern

life, or rather to a modern and more abstract life, the process that

he has applied to the painting of an ancient time, so strangely

picturesque.

"Who among us, in these days of ambition, has not dreamt of the miracle

of poetical, musical prose, without rhythm, without rhyme, supple

enough and apt enough to adapt itself to the movements of the soul, to

the swaying of a dream, to the sudden throbs of conscience?"

It is unnecessary to say that nothing resembles "Gaspard de la nuit"

less than the "Poems in Prose." Baudelaire himself saw this after he

commenced work, and he spoke of an _accident_, of which any other than

he would have been proud, but which only humiliated a mind which looked

upon the accomplishment of _exactly_ what it had intended as an honour.

We have seen that Baudelaire always claimed to direct his inspiration

according to his own will, and to introduce infallible mathematics into

his art. He blamed himself for producing anything but that upon which

he had resolved, even though it is, as in the present case, an original

and powerful work.

Our poetical language, it must be acknowledged, in spite of the

valiant effort of the new school to render it flexible and malleable,

hardly lends itself to rare and subtle detail, especially when

the subject is _la vie moderne_, familiar or luxurious. Without

having, as at one time, a horror for the calculated word and a love

of circumlocution, French verse, by its very construction, refuses

particularly significant expressions and if forced into direct

statement, immediately becomes hard, rugged, and laborious. "The Poems

in Prose" came very opportunely to supply this deficiency, and in this

form, which demands perfect art and where each word must be thrown,

before being employed, into scales more easy to weigh down than those

of the "Peseurs d'or" of Quintin Metsys--for it is necessary to have

the standard, the weights, and the balance--Baudelaire has shown a

precious side of his delicate and bizarre talent. He has been able to

approach the almost inexpressible and to render the fugitive nuances

which float between sound and colour, and those thoughts which resemble

arabesque _motifs_ or themes of musical phrases. It is not only to the

physical nature, but to the secret movements of the soul, to capricious

melancholy, to nervous hallucinations that this form is aptly applied.

The author of the "Flowers of Evil" has drawn from it marvellous

effects, and one is sometimes surprised that the language carries one

through the transparencies of a dream, in the blue distances, marks

out a ruined tower, a clump of trees, the summit of a mountain, and

shows one things impossible to describe, which, until now, have never

been expressed in words. This should be one of the glories, if not the

greatest, of Baudelaire, to bring within the range of style a series of

things, sensations, and effects unnamed by Adam, the great nomenclator.

A writer can be ambitious of no more beautiful title, and this the

author of the "Poems in prose" undoubtedly merits.

It is very difficult, without writing at great length--and, even then,

it is better to direct the reader straight to the poems themselves--to

give a just idea of these compositions; pictures, medallions,

bas-reliefs, statuettes, enamels, pastels, cameos which follow each

other rather like the vertebrae in the spine of a serpent. One is able

to pick out some of the rings, and the pieces join themselves together,

always living, having each its own soul writhing convulsively towards

an inaccessible ideal.

Before closing this Introduction, which, although already too long--for

we have simply chased through the work of the author and friend whose

talent we endeavour to explain--it is necessary to quote the titles

of the "Poems in Prose"--very superior in intensity, concentration,

profoundness, and elegance to the delicate fantasies of "Gaspard de

la nuit," which Baudelaire proposed to take as models. Among the

fifty pieces which comprise the collection, each different in tone

and composition, we will number "Le Gâteau, "La Chambre double," "Le

Foules," "Les Veuves," "Le vieux saltimbanque," "Une Hémisphère dans

une chevelure," "L'Invitation au voyage," "La Belle Dorothée," "Une

Mort héroïque," "Le Thyrse," Portraits de maîtresses," "Le Désir de

peindre," "Un Cheval de race" and especially "Les Bienfaits de la

lune," an adorable poem in which the poet expresses, with magical

illumination, what the English painter Millais has missed so completely

in his "Eve of St. Agnes"--the descent of the nocturnal star with its

phosphoric blue light, its grey of iridescent mother-of-pearl, its mist

traversed by rays in which atoms of silver beat like moths. From the

top of her stairway of clouds, the Moon leans down over the cradle of

a sleeping child, bathing it in her baneful and splendid light; she

dowers the sweet pale head like a fairy god-mother, and murmurs in its

ear: "Thou shalt submit eternally to the influence of my kiss, thou

shalt be beautiful after my fashion. Thou shalt love what I love and

those that love me: the waters, the clouds, the silence, the night, the

great green sea, the shapeless and multiform waters, the place where

thou art not, the lover whom thou knowest not, the prodigious flowers,

the perfumes that trouble the mind, the cats which swoon and groan like

women in hoarse or gentle voices."

We know of no other analogy to this perfect piece than the poetry of

Li-tai-pe, so well translated by Judith Walter, in which the Empress of

China draws, among the rays, on the stairway of jade made brilliant by

the moon, the folds of her white satin robe. A _lunatique_ only is able

to understand the moon and her mysterious charm.

When we listen to the music of Weber we experience at first a sensation

of magnetic sleep, a sort of appeasement which separates us without

any shock from real life. Then in the distance sounds a strange note

which makes us listen attentively. This note is like a sigh from the

supernatural world, like the voice of the invisible spirits which call

us. Oberon just puts his hunting-horn to his mouth and the magic forest

opens, stretching out into blue vistas peopled with all the fantastic

folk described by Shakespeare in "A Midsummer Night's Dream." Titania

herself appears in the transparent robe of silver gauze.

The reading of the "Poems in Prose" has often produced in us these

impressions; a phrase, a word--one only--bizarrely chosen and placed,

evoke for us an unknown world of forgotten and yet friendly faces.

They revive the memories of early life, and present a mysterious choir

of vanished ideas, murmuring in undertones among the phantoms of

things apart from the realities of life. Other phrases, of a morbid

tenderness, seem like music whispering consolation for unavowed sorrows

and irremediable despair. But it is necessary to beware, for such

things as these make us homesick, like the "Ranz des vaches" of the

poor Swiss lansquenet in the German ballad, in garrison at Strasbourg,

who swam across the Rhine, was retaken and shot "for having listened

too much to the sound of the horn of the Alps."

Charles Baudelaire, His Life · 第 25 / 76 题