CHAPTER V.

CONFUCIUS AND HIS IMMEDIATE DISCIPLES.

SECTION I.

LIFE OF CONFUCIUS.

1. 'And have you foreigners surnames as well?' This

question has often been put to me by Chinese. It marks the

ignorance which belongs to the people of all that is external to

[Sidebar] His ancestry.

themselves, and the pride of antiquity which enters largely as an

element into their character. If such a pride could in any case be

justified, we might allow it to the family of the K'ung, the

descendants of Confucius. In the reign of K'ang-hsi, twenty-one

centuries and a half after the death of the sage, they amounted to

eleven thousand males. But their ancestry is carried back through

a period of equal extent, and genealogical tables are common, in

which the descent of Confucius is traced down from Hwang-ti, in

whose reign the cycle was invented, B.C. 2637 [1].

The more moderate writers, however, content themselves

with exhibiting his ancestry back to the commencement of the

Chau dynasty, B.C. 1121. Among the relatives of the tyrant Chau,

the last emperor of the Yin dynasty, was an elder brother, by a

concubine, named Ch'i [2], who is celebrated by Confucius, Ana.

XVIII. i, under the title of the viscount of Wei. Foreseeing the

impending ruin of their family, Ch'i withdrew from the court; and

subsequently he was invested by the emperor Ch'ang, the second

of the house of Chau, with the principality of Sung, which

embraced the eastern portion of the present province of Ho-nan,

that he might there continue the sacrifices to the sovereigns of

Yin. Ch'i was followed as duke of Sung by a younger brother, in

whose line the succession continued. His great-grandson, the duke

Min [3], was

l See Memoires concernant les Chinois, Tome XII, p. 447 et seq.

Father Amiot states, p. 501, that he had seen the representative

of the family, who succeeded to the dignity of 衍聖公 in the ninth

year of Ch'ien-lung, A.D. 1744. The last duke, not the present, was

visited in our own time by the late Dr. Williamson and Mr. Consul

Markham. It is hardly necessary that I should say here, that the

name Confucius is merely the Chinese characters 孔夫子 (K'ung Fu-

tsze, 'The master K'ung') Latinized.

2 啟.

3 愍公.

followed, B.C. 908, by a younger brother, leaving, however, two

sons, Fu-fu Ho [1] and Fang-sze [2]. Fu Ho [3] resigned his right to

the dukedom in favour of Fang-sze, who put his uncle to death in

B.C. 893, and became master of the State. He is known as the duke

Li [4], and to his elder brother belongs the honour of having the

sage among his descendants.

Three descents from Fu Ho, we find Chang K'ao-fu [5], who

was a distinguished officer under the dukes Tai, Wu, and Hsuan [6]

(B.C. 799-728). He is still celebrated for his humility, and for his

literary tastes. We have accounts of him as being in

communication with the Grand-historiographer of the kingdom,

and engaged in researches about its ancient poetry, thus setting

an example of one of the works to which Confucius gave himself

[7]. K'ao gave birth to K'ung-fu Chia [8], from whom the surname of

K'ung took its rise. Five generations had now elapsed since the

dukedom was held in the direct line of his ancestry, and it was

according to the rule in such cases that the branch should cease

its connexion with the ducal stem, and merge among the people

under a new surname. K'ung Chia was Master of the Horse in Sung,

and an officer of well-known loyalty and probity. Unfortunately

for himself, he had a wife of surpassing beauty, of whom the

chief minister of the State, by name Hwa Tu [9], happened on one

occasion to get a glimpse. Determined to possess her, he

commenced a series of intrigues, which ended, B.C. 710, in the

murder of Chia and of the ruling duke Shang [10]. At the same

time, Tu secured the person of the lady, and hastened to his

palace with the prize, but on the way she had strangled herself

with her girdle.

An enmity was thus commenced between the two families

of K'ung and Hwa which the lapse of time did not obliterate, and

the latter being the more powerful of the two, Chia's great-

grandson withdrew into the State of Lu to avoid their persecution.

There he was appointed commandant of the city of Fang [11], and

is known

1 佛父何.

2 魴(al. 方) 祀.

3 I drop here the 父 (second tone), which seems to have been used

in those times in a manner equivalent to our Mr.

4 厲公.

5 正考甫; 甫 is used in the same way as 父; see note 3.

6 戴, 武, 宣, 三公.

7 See the 魯語, and 商頌詩序; quoted in Chiang Yung's (工永) Life of

Confucius, which forms a part of the 鄉黨圖考.

8 孔父嘉.

9 華督.

10 殤公.

11 防.

in history by the name of Fang-shu [1]. Fang-shu gave birth to Po-

hsia [2], and from him came Shu-liang Heh [3], the father of

Confucius. Heh appears in the history of the times as a soldier of

great prowess and daring bravery. In the year B.C. 562, when

serving at the siege of a place called Peh-yang [4], a party of the

assailants made their way in at a gate which had purposely been

left open, and no sooner were they inside than the portcullis was

dropped. Heh was just entering; and catching the massive

structure with both his hands, he gradually by dint of main

strength raised it and held it up, till his friends had made their

escape.

Thus much on the ancestry of the sage. Doubtless he could

trace his descent in the way which has been indicated up to the

imperial house of Yin, nor was there one among his ancestors

during the rule of Chau to whom he could not refer with

satisfaction. They had been ministers and soldiers of Sung and Lu,

all men of worth, and in Chang K'ao, both for his humility and

literary researches, Confucius might have special complacency.

2. Confucius was the child of Shu-liang Heh's old age. The

soldier had married in early life, but his wife brought him only

[Sidebar] From his birth to his first public employments. B.C. 551-

531.

daughters,-- to the number of nine, and no son. By a concubine he

had a son, named Mang-p'i, and also Po-ni [5], who proved a

cripple, so that, when he was over seventy years, Heh sought a

second wife in the Yen family [6], from which came subsequently

Yen Hui, the favourite disciple of his son. There were three

daughters in the family, the youngest being named Chang-tsai [7].

Their father said to them, 'Here is the commandant of Tsau. His

father and grandfather were only scholars, but his ancestors

before them were descendants of the sage sovereigns. He is a man

ten feet high [8], and of extraordinary prowess, and I am very

desirous of his alliance. Though he is old and austere, you need

have no misgivings about him. Which of you three will be his

wife? 'The two elder daughters were silent, but Chang-tsai said,

'Why do you ask us, father? It is for you to determine.' 'Very well,'

said her father in reply, 'you will do.' Chang-tsai, accordingly,

became Heh's wife, and in due time gave

1 防叔.

2 伯夏.

3 叔梁紇.

4 偪陽.

5 孟皮, 一字伯尼.

6 顏氏.

7 徵在.

8 其人, 身長十尺. See, on the length of the ancient foot, Ana. VIII.

vi, but the point needs a more sifting investigation than it has yet

received.

birth to Confucius, who received the name of Ch'iu, and was

subsequently styled Chung-ni [1]. The event happened on the

twenty-first day of the tenth month of the twenty-first year of

the duke Hsiang, of Lu, being the twentieth year of the emperor

Ling, B.C. 552 [2]. The birth-place was in the district of Tsau [3],

of which Heh was the governor. It was somewhere within the

limits of the present department of Yen-chau in Shan-tung, but

the honour of being the exact spot is claimed for two places in

two different districts of the department.

The notices which we have of Confucius's early years are

very scanty. When he was in his third year his father died. It is

related of him, that as a boy he used to play at the arrangement of

1 名邱, 字仲尼. The legends say that Chang-tsai fearing lest she

should not have a son, in consequence of her husband's age,

privately ascended the Ni-ch'iu hill to pray for the boon, and that

when she had obtained it, she commemorated the fact in the

names -- Ch'iu and Chung-ni. But the cripple, Mang-p'i, had

previous been styled Po-ni. There was some reason, previous to

Confucius's birth, for using the term ni in the family. As might be

expected, the birth of the sage is surrounded with many

prodigious occurrences. One account is, that the husband and wife

prayed together for a son in a dell of mount Ni. As Chang-tsai

went up the hill, the leaves of the trees and plants all erected

themselves, and bent downwards on her return. That night she

dreamt the black Ti appeared, and said to her, 'You shall have a

son, a sage, and you must bring him forth in a hollow mulberry

tree.' One day during her pregnancy, she fell into a dreamy state,

and saw five old men in the hall, who called themselves the

essences of the five planets, and led an animal which looked like

a small cow with one horn, and was covered with scales like a

dragon. This creature knelt before Chang-tsai, and cast forth from

its mouth a slip of jade, on which was the inscription,-- 'The son

of the essence of water shall succeed to the decaying Chau, and

be a throneless king.' Chang-tsai tied a piece of embroidered

ribbon about its horn, and the vision disappeared. When Heh was

told of it, he said, 'The creature must be the Ch'i-lin.' As her time

drew near, Chang-tsai asked her husband if there was any place in

the neighborhood called 'the hollow mulberry tree.' He told her

there was a dry cave in the south hill, which went by that name.

Then she said, 'I will go and be confined there.' Her husband was

surprised, but when made acquainted with her former dream, he

made the necessary arrangements. On the night when the child

was born, two dragons came and kept watch on the left and right

of the hill, and two spirit-ladies appeared in the air, pouring out

fragrant odors, as if to bathe Chang-tsai; and as soon as the birth

took place, a spring of clear warm water bubbled up from the

floor of the cave, which dried up again when the child had been

washed in it. The child was of an extraordinary appearance; with

a mouth like the sea, ox lips, a dragon's back, &c. &c. On the top of

his head was a remarkable formation, in consequence of which he

was named Ch'iu, &c. See the 列國志, Bk. lxxviii.--Sze-ma Ch'ien

seems to make Confucius to have been illegitimate, saying that

Heh and Miss Yen cohabited in the wilderness (野合). Chiang Yung

says that the phrase has reference simply to the disparity of

their ages.

2 Sze-ma Ch'ien says that Confucius was born in the twenty-

second year of duke Hsiang, B.C. 550. He is followed by Chu Hsi in

the short sketch of Confucius's life prefixed to the Lun Yu, and by

'The Annals of the Empire' (歷代統紀表), published with imperial

sanction in the reign of Chia-ch'ing. (To this latter work I have

generally referred for my dates.) The year assigned in the text

above rests on the authority of Ku-liang and Kung-yang, the two

commentators on the Ch'un-Ch'iu. With regard to the month,

however, the tenth is that assigned by Ku-liang, while Kung-yang

names the eleventh.

3 Tsau is written 郰, 鄹, 陬, and 鄒.

sacrificial vessels, and at postures of ceremony. Of his schooling

we have no reliable account. There is a legend, indeed, that at

seven he went to school to Yen P'ing-chung [1], but it must be

rejected as P'ing-chung belonged to the State of Ch'i. He tells us

himself that at fifteen he bent his mind to learning [2]; but the

condition of the family was one of poverty. At a subsequent

period, when people were astonished at the variety of his

knowledge, he explained it by saying, 'When I was young, my

condition was low, and therefore I acquired my ability in many

things; but they were mean matters [3].'

When he was nineteen, he married a lady from the State of

Sung, of the Chien-kwan family [4], and in the following year his

son Li was born. On the occasion of this event, the duke Chao sent

him a present of a couple of carp. It was to signify his sense of

his prince's favour, that he called his son Li (The Carp), and

afterwards gave him the designation of Po-yu [5] (Fish Primus).

No mention is made of the birth of any other children, though we

know, from Ana. V. i, that he had at least one daughter. We know

also, from an inscription on her grave, that he had one other

daughter, who died when she was quite young. The fact of the duke

of Lu's sending him a gift on the occasion of Li's birth, shows that

he was not unknown, but was already commanding public

attention and the respect of the great.

It was about this time, probably in the year after his

marriage, that Confucius took his first public employment, as

keeper of the stores of grain [6], and in the following year he was

put in charge of the public fields and lands [7]. Mencius adduces

these employments in illustration of his doctrine that the

superior man may at times take office on account of his poverty,

but must confine himself in such a case to places of small

emolument, and aim at nothing but the discharge of their humble

duties. According to him. Confucius, as keeper of stores, said, 'My

calculations must all be right:-- that is all I have to care about;'

and when in charge of the public fields, he said, 'The oxen and

sheep must be fat and strong and

1 晏平仲.

2 Ana. II. iv.

3 Ana. IX. vi.

4 娶宋之幵官氏.

5 名曰鯉, 而字伯魚.

6 為委吏. This is Mencius's account. Sze-ma Ch'ien says 嘗為季氏吏,

but his subsequent words 料量平 show that the office was the

same.

7 Mencius calls this office 乘田, while Sze-ma Ch'ien says 為司職

吏.

superior:-- that is all I have to care about [1].' It does not appear

whether these offices were held by Confucius in the direct

employment of the State, or as a dependent of the Chi family in

whose jurisdiction he lived. The present of the carp from the duke

may incline us to suppose the former.

3. In his twenty-second year, Confucius commenced his

labors as a public teacher, and his house became a resort for

young and inquiring spirits, who wished to learn the doctrines of

antiquity.

[Sidebar] Commencement of his labors as a teacher. The death of

his mother. B.C. 531-527.

However small the fee his pupils were able to afford, he never

refused his instructions [2]. All that he required, was an ardent

desire for improvement, and some degree of capacity. 'I do not

open up the truth,' he said, 'to one who is not eager to get

knowledge, nor help out any one who is not anxious to explain

himself. When I have presented one corner of a subject to any one,

and he cannot from it learn the other three, I do not repeat my

lesson [3].'

His mother died in the year B.C. 527, and he resolved that

her body should lie in the same grave with that of his father, and

that their common resting-place should be in Fang, the first home

of the K'ung in Lu. But here a difficulty presented itself. His

father's coffin had been for twenty years where it had first been

deposited, off the road of The Five Fathers, in the vicinity of

Tsau:-- would it be right in him to move it? He was relieved from

this perplexity by an old woman of the neighborhood, who told him

that the coffin had only just been put into the ground, as a

temporary arrangement, and not regularly buried. On learning this,

he carried his purpose into execution. Both coffins were conveyed

to Fang, and put in the ground together, with no intervening space

between them, as was the custom in some States. And now came a

new perplexity. He said to himself, 'In old times, they had graves,

but raised no tumulus over them. But I am a man, who belongs

equally to the north and the south, the east and the west. I must

have something by which I can remember the place.' Accordingly

he raised a mound, four feet high, over the grave, and returned

home, leaving a party of his disciples to see everything properly

completed. In the meantime there came on a heavy storm of rain,

and it was a considerable time before the disciples joined him.

'What makes you so late?' he asked. 'The grave in Fang fell down,'

they said. He made no reply, and they repeated their

1 Mencius, V. Pt. II. v. 4.

2 Ana. VII. vii.

3 Ana. VII. viii.

answer three times, when he burst into tears, and said, 'Ah! they

did not make their graves so in antiquity [1].' 'Confucius mourned

for his mother the regular period of three years,-- three years

nominally, but in fact only twenty-seven months. Five days after

the mourning was expired, he played on his lute, but could not

sing. It required other five days before he could accompany an

instrument with his voice [2].

Some writers have represented Confucius as teaching his

disciples important lessons from the manner in which he buried

his mother, and having a design to correct irregularities in the

ordinary funeral ceremonies of the time. These things are

altogether 'without book.' We simply have a dutiful son paying the

last tribute of affection to a good parent. In one point he departs

from the ancient practice, raising a mound over the grave, and

when the fresh earth gives way from a sudden rain, he is moved to

tears, and seems to regret his innovation. This sets Confucius

vividly before us,-- a man of the past as much as of the present,

whose own natural feelings were liable to be hampered in their

development by the traditions of antiquity which he considered

sacred. It is important, however, to observe the reason which he

gave for rearing the mound. He had in it a presentiment of much of

his future course. He was 'a man of the north, the south, the east,

and the west.' He might not confine himself to any one State. He

would travel, and his way might be directed to some 'wise ruler,'

whom his counsels would conduct to a benevolent sway that

would break forth on every side till it transformed the empire.

4. When the mourning for his mother was over, Confucius

remained in Lu, but in what special capacity we do not know.

Probably he continued to encourage the resort of

[Sidebar] He learns music; visits the court of Chau; and returns to

Lu.

B.C. 527-517.

inquirers to whom he communicated instruction, and pursued his

own researches into the history, literature, and institutions of

the empire. In the year B.C. 525, the chief of the small State of

T'an [3], made his appearance at the court of Lu, and discoursed in

a wonderful manner, at a feast given to him by the duke, about the

names which the most ancient sovereigns, from Hwang-ti

downwards, gave to their

1 Li Chi, II. Sect I. i. 10; Sect. II. iii. 30; Pt. I. i. 6. See also the

discussion of those passages in Chiang Yung's 'Life of Confucius.'

2 Li Chi, II. Sect. I. i. 23.

3 See the Ch'un Ch'iu, under the seventh year of duke Chao,-- 秋, 郯

子來朝.

ministers. The sacrifices to the emperor Shao-hao, the next in

descent from Hwang-ti, were maintained in T'an, so that the chief

fancied that he knew all about the abstruse subject on which he

discoursed. Confucius, hearing about the matter, waited on the

visitor, and learned from him all that he had to communicate [1].

To the year B.C. 525, when Confucius was twenty-nine years

old, is referred his studying music under a famous master of the

name of Hsiang [2]. He was approaching his thirtieth year when, as

he tells us, 'he stood [3]' firm, that is, in his convictions on the

subjects of learning to which he had bent his mind fifteen years

before. Five years more, however, were still to pass by, before

the anticipation mentioned in the conclusion of the last paragraph

began to receive its fulfillment [4], though we may conclude from

the way in which it was brought about that he was growing all

the time in the estimation of the thinking minds in his native

State.

In the twenty-fourth year of duke Chao, B.C. 518, one of the

principal ministers of Lu, known by the name of Mang Hsi, died.

Seventeen years before, he had painfully felt his ignorance of

ceremonial observances, and had made it his subsequent business

to make himself acquainted with them. On his deathbed, he

addressed his chief officer, saying, 'A knowledge of propriety is

the stem of a man. Without it he has no means of standing firm. I

have heard that there is one K'ung Ch'iu, who is thoroughly versed

in it. He is a descendant of sages, and though the line of his

family was extinguished in Sung, among his ancestors there were

Fu-fu Ho, who resigned the State to his brother, and Chang K'ao-

fu, who was distinguished for his humility. Tsang Heh has

observed that if sage men of intelligent virtue do not attain to

eminence, distinguished men are sure to appear among their

posterity. His words are now to be verified, I think, in K'ung Ch'iu.

After my death, you must

1 This rests on the respectable authority of Tso Ch'iu-ming's

annotations on the Ch'un Ch'iu, but I must consider it apocryphal.

The legend-writers have fashioned a journey to T'an. The

slightest historical intimation becomes a text with them, on

which they enlarge to the glory of the sage. Amiot has reproduced

and expanded their romancings, and others, such as Pauthier

(Chine, pp. 121-183) and Thornton (History of China, vol. i. pp.

151-215), have followed in his wake.

2 師襄. See the 'Narratives of the School,' 卷三, art 辯樂解; but the

account there given is not more credible than the chief of T'an's

expositions.

3 Ana. II. iv.

4 The journey to Chau is placed by Sze-ma Ch'ien before

Confucius's holding of his first official employments, and Chu Hsi

and most other writers follow him. It is a great error, and arisen

from a misunderstanding of the passage from the 左氏傳 upon the

subject.

tell Ho-chi to go and study proprieties under him [1].' In

consequence of this charge, Ho-chi [2], Mang Hsi's son, who

appears in the Analects under the name of Mang I [3], and a

brother, or perhaps on]y a near relative, named Nan-kung Chang-

shu [4], became disciples of Confucius. Their wealth and standing

in the State gave him a position which he had not had before, and

he told Chang-shu of a wish which he had to visit the court of

Chau, and especially to confer on the subject of ceremonies and

music with Lao Tan. Chang-shu represented the matter to the duke

Ch'ao, who put a carriage and a pair of horses at Confucius's

disposal for the expedition [5].

At this time the court of Chau was in the city of Lo [6]. in

the present department of Ho-nan of the province of the same

name. The reigning sovereign is known by the title of Chang [7],

but the sovereignty was little more than nominal. The state of

China was then analogous to that of one of the European kingdoms

during the prevalence of the feudal system. At the commencement

of the dynasty, the various states of the kingdom had been

assigned to the relatives and adherents of the reigning family.

There were thirteen principalities of greater note, and a large

number of smaller dependencies. During the vigorous youth of the

dynasty, the sovereign or lord paramount exercised an effective

control over the various chiefs, but with the lapse of time there

came weakness and decay. The chiefs --corresponding somewhat

to the European dukes, earls, marquises, barons, &c. -- quarrelled

and warred among themselves, and the stronger among them

barely acknowledged their subjection to the sovereign. A similar

condition of things prevailed in each particular State. There there

[sic] were hereditary ministerial families, who were continually

encroaching on the authority of their rulers, and the heads of

those families again were frequently hard pressed by their

inferior officers. Such was the state of China in Confucius's time.

The reader must have it clearly before him, if he would

understand the position of the sage, and the reforms which, we

shall find, it was subsequently his object to introduce.

Arrived at Chau, he had no intercourse with the court or any

of

1 See 左氏傳, 昭公七年.

2 何忌.

3 孟懿子.

4 南宮敬叔.

5 The 家語 makes Chang-shu accompany Confucius to Chau. It is

difficult to understand this, if Chang-shu were really a son of

Mang Hsi who had died that year.

6 洛.

7 敬王 (B.C. 519-475)

the principal ministers. He was there not as a politician, but as

an inquirer about the ceremonies and maxims of the founders of

the existing dynasty. Lao Tan [1], whom he had wished to see,

generally acknowledged as the founder of the Taoists, or

Rationalistic sect (so called), which has maintained its ground in

opposition to the followers of Confucius, was then a curator of

the royal library. They met and freely interchanged their views,

but no reliable account of their conversations has been preserved.

In the fifth Book of the Li Chi, which is headed 'The philosopher

Tsang asked,' Confucius refers four times to the views of Lao-

tsze on certain points of funeral ceremonies, and in the

'Narratives of the School,' Book XXIV, he tells Chi K'ang what he

had heard from him about 'The Five Tis,' but we may hope their

conversation turned also on more important subjects. Sze-ma

Ch'ien, favourable to Lao-tsze, makes him lecture his visitor in

the following style:-- 'Those whom you talk about are dead, and

their bones are moldered to dust; only their words remain. When

the superior man gets his time, he mounts aloft; but when the

time is against him, he moves as if his feet were entangled. I

have heard that a good merchant, though he has rich treasures

deeply stored, appears as if he were poor, and that the superior

man whose virtue is complete, is yet to outward seeming stupid.

Put away your proud air and many desires, your insinuating habit

and wild will [2]. These are of no advantage to you. This is all

which I have to tell you.' On the other hand, Confucius is made to

say to his disciples, 'I know how birds can fly, how fishes can

swim, and how animals can run. But the runner may be snared, the

swimmer may be hooked, and the flyer may be shot by the arrow.

But there is the dragon. I cannot tell how he mounts on the wind

through the clouds, and rises to heaven. Today I have seen Lao-

tsze, and can only compare him to the dragon [3].'

While at Lo, Confucius walked over the grounds set apart for

the great sacrifices to Heaven and Earth; inspected the pattern of

the Hall of Light, built to give audience in to the princes of the

kingdom; and examined all the arrangements of the ancestral

temple and the court. From the whole he received a profound

1 According to Sze-ma Ch'ien, Tan was the posthumous epithet of

this individual, whose surname was Li (李), name R (耳), and

designation Po-yang (伯陽).

2 逸態與淫志.

3 See the 史記, 列傳第三, and compare the remarks attributed to

Lao-tsze in the account of the K'ung family near the beginning.

impression. 'Now,' said he with a sigh, 'I know the sage wisdom of

the duke of Chau, and how the House of Chau attained to the royal

sway [1].' On the walls of the Hall of Light were paintings of the

ancient sovereigns from Yao and Shun downwards, their

characters appearing in the representations of them, and words of

praise or warning being appended. There was also a picture of the

duke of Chau sitting with his infant nephew, the king Ch'ang, upon

his knees, to give audience to all the princes. Confucius surveyed

the scene with silent delight, and then said to his followers,

'Here you see how Chau became so great. As we use a glass to

examine the forms of things, so must we study antiquity in order

to understand the present time [2].' In the hall of the ancestral

temple, there was a metal statue of a man with three clasps upon

his mouth, and his back covered over with an enjoyable homily on

the duty of keeping a watch upon the lips. Confucius turned to his

disciples and said, 'Observe it, my children. These words are true,

and commend themselves to our feelings [3].'

About music he made inquiries at Ch'ang Hung, to whom the

following remarks are attributed:-- 'I have observed about Chung-

ni many marks of a sage. He has river eyes and a dragon forehead,-

- the very characteristics of Hwang-ti. His arms are long, his

back is like a tortoise, and he is nine feet six inches in height,--

the very semblance of T'ang the Completer. When he speaks, he

praises the ancient kings. He moves along the path of humility and

courtesy. He has heard of every subject, and retains with a strong

memory. His knowledge of things seems inexhaustible.-- Have we

not in him the rising of a sage [4]?'

I have given these notices of Confucius at the court of Chau,

more as being the only ones I could find, than because I put much

faith in them. He did not remain there long, but returned the same

year to Lu, and continued his work of teaching. His fame was

greatly increased; disciples came to him from different parts,

till their number amounted to three thousand. Several of those

who have come down to us as the most distinguished among his

followers, however, were yet unborn, and the statement just

given may be considered as an exaggeration. We are not to

conceive of the disciples as forming a community, and living

together. Parties

1 2 3 See the 家語, 卷二, art. 觀周.

4 Quoted by Chiang Yung from the 'Narratives of the School.'

of them may have done so. We shall find Confucius hereafter

always moving amid a company of admiring pupils; but the greater

number must have had their proper avocations and ways of living,

and would only resort to the Master, when they wished specially

to ask his counsel or to learn of him.

5. In the year succeeding the return to Lu, that State fell

into great confusion. There were three Families in it, all

connected irregularly with the ducal House, which had long kept

the rulers in a condition of dependency. They appear frequently in

the Analects as the Chi clan, the Shu, and the Mang; and while

Confucius freely spoke of their

[Sidebar] He withdraws to Chi and returns to Lu the following

year. B.C. 515, 516.

usurpations [1], he was a sort of dependent of the Chi family, and

appears in frequent communication with members of all the three.

In the year B.C. 517, the duke Chao came to open hostilities with

them, and being worsted, fled into Ch'i, the State adjoining Lu on

the north. Thither Confucius also repaired, that he might avoid the

prevailing disorder of his native State. Ch'i was then under the

government of a ruler (in rank a marquis, but historically called

duke) , afterwards styled Ching [2], who 'had a thousand teams,

each of four horses, but on the day of his death the people did not

praise him for a single virtue [3].' His chief minister, however,

was Yen Ying [4], a man of considerable ability and worth. At his

court the music of the ancient sage-emperor, Shun, originally

brought to Ch'i from the State of Ch'an [5], was still preserved.

According to the 'Narratives of the School,' an incident

occurred on the way to Ch'i, which I may transfer to these pages

as a good specimen of the way in which Confucius turned

occurring matters to account, in his intercourse with his

disciples. As he was passing by the side of the Tai mountain,

there was a woman weeping and wailing by a grave. Confucius

bent forward in his carriage, and after listening to her for some

time, sent Tsze-lu to ask the cause of her grief. 'You weep, as if

you had experienced sorrow upon sorrow,' said Tsze-lu. The

woman replied, 'It is so. My husband's father was killed here by a

tiger, and my husband also; and now my son has met the same

fate.' Confucius asked her why she did not remove from the place,

and on her answering,' There is here no oppressive government,' he

turned to his disciples, and said, 'My

1 See Analects, III. i. ii, et al.

2 景公.

3 Ana. XVI. xii.

4 晏嬰. This is the same who was afterwards styled 晏平仲.

5 陳.

children, remember this. Oppressive government is fiercer than a

tiger [1].'

As soon as he crossed the border from Lu, we are told he

discovered from the gait and manners of a boy, whom he saw

carrying a pitcher, the influence of the sages' music, and told the

driver of his carriage to hurry on to the capital [2]. Arrived there,

he heard the strain, and was so ravished with it, that for three

months he did not know the taste of flesh. 'I did not think,' he

said, 'that music could have been made so excellent as this [3].'

The duke Ching was pleased with the conferences which he had

with him [4], and proposed to assign to him the town of Lin-ch'iu,

from the revenues of which he might derive a sufficient support;

but Confucius refused the gift, and said to his disciples, 'A

superior man will only receive reward for services which he has

done. I have given advice to the duke Ching, but he has not yet

obeyed it, and now he would endow me with this place! Very far is

he from understanding me [5]!'

On one occasion the duke asked about government, and

received the characteristic reply, 'There is government when the

ruler is ruler, and the minister is minister; when the father is

father, and the son is son [6].' I say that the reply is

characteristic. Once, when Tsze-lu asked him what he would

consider the first thing to be done if entrusted with the

government of a State, Confucius answered, 'What is necessary is

to rectify names [7].' The disciple thought the reply wide of the

mark, but it was substantially the same with what he said to the

marquis Ching. There is a sufficient foundation in nature for

government in the several relations of society, and if those be

maintained and developed according to their relative significancy,

it is sure to obtain. This was a first principle in the political

ethics of Confucius.

Another day the duke got to a similar inquiry the reply that

the art of government lay in an economical use of the revenues;

and being pleased, he resumed his purpose of retaining the

philosopher in his State, and proposed to assign to him the fields

of Ni-ch'i. His

1 See the 家語, 卷四, art. 正論解. I have translated, however, from

the Li Chi, II. Sect. II. iii. 10, where the same incident is given,

with some variations, and without saying when or where it

occurred.

2 See the 說苑, 卷十九, p. 13.

3 Ana. VII. xiii.

4 Some of these are related in the 'Narratives of the School;'--

about the burning of the ancestral shrine of the sovereign 釐, and

a one-footed bird which appeared hopping and flapping its wings

in Ch'i. They are plainly fabulous, though quoted in proof of

Confucius's sage wisdom. This reference to them is more than

enough.

5 家語, 卷二, 六本.

6 Ana. XII. xi.

7 Ana. XIII. iii.

chief minister Yen Ying dissuaded him from the purpose, saying,

'Those scholars are impracticable, and cannot be imitated. They

are haughty and conceited of their own views, so that they will

not be content in inferior positions. They set a high value on all

funeral ceremonies, give way to their grief, and will waste their

property on great burials, so that they would only be injurious to

the common manners. This Mr. K'ung has a thousand peculiarities.

It would take generations to exhaust all that he knows about the

ceremonies of going up and going down. This is not the time to

examine into his rules of propriety. If you, prince, wish to employ

him to change the customs of Ch'i, you will not be making the

people your primary consideration [1].'

I had rather believe that these were not the words of Yen

Ying, but they must represent pretty correctly the sentiments of

many of the statesmen of the time about Confucius. The duke of

Ch'i got tired ere long of having such a monitor about him, and

observed. 'I cannot treat him as I would the chief of the Chi

family. I will treat him in a way between that accorded to the

chief of the Chi, and that given to the chief of the Mang family.'

Finally he said, 'I am old; I cannot use his doctrines [2].' These

observations were made directly to Confucius, or came to his

hearing [3]. It was not consistent with his self-respect to remain

longer in Ch'i, and he returned to Lu [4].

6. Returned to Lu, he remained for the long period of about

fifteen years without being engaged in any official employment.

It

[Sidebar] He remains without office in Lu, B.C. 516-501.

was a time indeed of great disorder. The duke Chao continued a

refugee in Ch'i, the government being in the hands of the great

Families, up to his death in B.C. 510, on which event the rightful

heir was set aside, and another member of the ducal House, known

to us by the title of Ting [5], substituted in his place. The ruling

authority of the principality became thus still more enfeebled

than it had been before, and, on the other hand, the chiefs of the

Chi, the Shu, and the Mang, could hardly keep their ground against

their own officers. Of those latter, the two most conspicuous

were Yang Hu [6], called also Yang Ho [7], and

1 See the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 2.

2 Ana. XVIII. iii

3 Sze-ma Ch'ien makes the first observation to have been

addressed directly to Confucius.

4 According to the above account Confucius was only once, and for

a portion of two years, in Ch'i. For the refutation of contrary

accounts, see Chiang Yung's Life of the Sage.

5 定公.

6 陽虎.

7 陽貨.

Kung-shan Fu-zao [1]. At one time Chi Hwan, the most powerful of

the chiefs, was kept a prisoner by Yang Hu, and was obliged to

make terms with him in order to obtain his liberation. Confucius

would give his countenance to none, as he disapproved of all, and

he studiously kept aloof from them. Of how he comported himself

among them we have a specimen in the incident related in the

Analects, XVII. i.-- 'Yang Ho wished to see Confucius, but

Confucius would not go to see him. On this, he sent a present of a

pig to Confucius, who, having chosen a time when Ho was not at

home, went to pay his respects for the gift. He met him, however,

on the way. "Come, let me speak with you," said the officer. "Can

he be called benevolent, who keeps his jewel in his bosom, and

leaves his country to confusion?" Confucius replied, "No." "Can he

be called wise, who is anxious to be engaged in public

employment, and yet is constantly losing the opportunity of being

so?" Confucius again said, "No." The other added, "The days and

months are passing away; the years do not wait for us." Confucius

said, "Right; I will go into office."' Chinese writers are eloquent

in their praises of the sage for the combination of propriety,

complaisance and firmness, which they see in his behavior in this

matter. To myself there seems nothing remarkable in it but a

somewhat questionable dexterity. But it was well for the fame of

Confucius that his time was not occupied during those years with

official services. He turned them to better account, prosecuting

his researches into the poetry, history, ceremonies, and music of

the nation. Many disciples continued to resort to him, and the

legendary writers tell us how he employed their services in

digesting the results of his studies. I must repeat, however, that

several of them, whose names are most famous, such as Tsang

Shan, were as yet children, and Min Sun [2] was not born till B.C.

500.

To this period we must refer the almost single instance

which we have of the manner of Confucius's intercourse with his

son Li. 'Have you heard any lessons from your father different

from what we have all heard?' asked one of the disciples once of

Li. 'No,' said Li. 'He was standing alone once, when I was passing

through the court below with hasty steps, and said to me, "Have

you learned the Odes?" On my replying, "Not yet," he added, "If you

do not learn the Odes, you will not be fit to converse with."

Another day,

1 公山佛擾(史記, 狃).

2 閔損.

in the same place and the same way, he said to me, "Have you read

the rules of Propriety?" On my replying, "Not yet," he added, "If

you do not learn the rules of Propriety, your character cannot be

established." I have heard only these two things from him.' The

disciple was delighted and observed, 'I asked one thing, and I have

got three things. I have heard about the Odes. I have heard about

the rules of Propriety. I have also heard that the superior man

maintains a distant reserve towards his son [1].'

I can easily believe that this distant reserve was the rule

which Confucius followed generally in his treatment of his son. A

stern dignity is the quality which a father has to maintain upon

his system. It is not to be without the element of kindness, but

that must never go beyond the line of propriety. There is too little

room left for the play and development of natural affection.

The divorce of his wife must also have taken place during

these years, if it ever took place at all, which is a disputed point.

The curious reader will find the question discussed in the notes

on the second Book of the Li Chi. The evidence inclines, I think,

against the supposition that Confucius did put his wife away.

When she died, at a period subsequent to the present, Li kept on

weeping aloud for her after the period for such a demonstration

of grief had expired, when Confucius sent a message to him that

his sorrow must be subdued, and the obedient son dried his tears

[2]. We are glad to know that on one occasion the death of his

favourite disciple, Yen Hui -- the tears of Confucius himself

would flow over and above the measure of propriety [3].

7. We come to the short period of Confucius's official life.

In the

[Sidebar] He holds office. B.C. 500-496.

year B.C. 501, things had come to a head between the chiefs of the

three Families and their ministers, and had resulted in the defeat

of the latter. In that year the resources of Yang Hu were

exhausted, and he fled into Ch'i, so that the State was delivered

from its greatest troubler, and the way was made more clear for

Confucius to go into office, should an opportunity occur. It soon

presented itself. Towards the end of that year he was made chief

magistrate of the town of Chung-tu [4].

1 Ana. XVI. xiii.

2 See the Li Chi, II. Pt. I. i. 27.

3 Ana. XI. ix.

4 中都宰. Amiot says this was 'la ville meme ou le Souverain

tenoit sa Cour' (Vie de Confucius, p. 147). He is followed of course

by Thornton and Pauthier. My reading has not shown me that such

was the case. In the notes to K'ang-hsi's edition of the 'Five

Ching,' Li Chi, II Sect. I. iii. 4, it is simply said-- 'Chung-tu,-- the

name of a town of Lu. It afterwards belonged to Ch'i when it was

called Ping-lu (平陸).'

Just before he received this appointment, a circumstance

occurred of which we do not well know what to make. When Yang-

hu fled into Ch'i, Kung-shan Fu-zao, who had been confederate

with him, continued to maintain an attitude of rebellion, and held

the city of Pi against the Chi family. Thence he sent a message to

Confucius inviting him to join him, and the Sage seemed so

inclined to go that his disciple Tsze-lu remonstrated with him,

saying, 'Indeed you cannot go! why must you think of going to see

Kung-shan?' Confucius replied, 'Can it be without some reason

that he has invited me? If any one employ me, may I not make an

eastern Chau [1]?'

The upshot, however, was that he did not go, and I cannot

suppose that he had ever any serious intention of doing so. Amid

the general gravity of his intercourse with his followers, there

gleam out a few instances of quiet pleasantry, when he amused

himself by playing with their notions about him. This was

probably one of them.

As magistrate of Chung-tu he produced a marvellous

reformation of the manners of the people in a short time.

According to the 'Narratives of the School,' he enacted rules for

the nourishing of the living and all observances to the dead.

Different food was assigned to the old and the young, and

different burdens to the strong and the weak. Males and females

kept apart from each other in the streets. A thing dropped on the

road was not picked up. There was no fraudulent carving of

vessels. Inner coffins were made four inches thick, and the outer

ones five. Graves were made on the high grounds, no mounds being

raised over them, and no trees planted about them. Within twelve

months, the princes of the other States all wished to imitate his

style of administration [2].

The duke Ting, surprised at what he saw, asked whether his

rules could be employed to govern a whole State, and Confucius

told him that they might be applied to the whole kingdom. On this

the duke appointed him assistant-superintendent of Works [3], in

which capacity he surveyed the lands of the State, and made many

improvements in agriculture. From this he was quickly made

minister of Crime [4], and the appointment was enough to put an

end to crime. There was no necessity to put the penal laws in

execution. No offenders showed themselves [5].

1 Ana. XVII. v.

2 家語, Bk. I.

3 司空. This office, however, was held by the chief of the Mang

Family. We must understand that Confucius was only an assistant

to him, or perhaps acted for him.

4 大司寇.

5 家語, Bk. I.

These indiscriminating eulogies are of little value. One

incident, related in the annotations of Tso-shih on the Ch'un-Ch'iu

[1], commends itself at once to our belief, as in harmony with

Confucius's character. The chief of the Chi, pursuing with his

enmity the duke Chao, even after his death, had placed his grave

apart from the graves of his predecessors; and Confucius

surrounded the ducal cemetery with a ditch so as to include the

solitary resting-place, boldly telling the chief that he did it to

hide his disloyalty [2]. But he signalized himself most of all in

B.C. 500, by his behavior at an interview between the dukes of Lu

and Ch'i, at a place called Shih-ch'i [3], and Chia-ku [4], in the

present district of Lai-wu, in the department of T'ai-an [5].

Confucius was present as master of ceremonies on the part of Lu,

and the meeting was professedly pacific. The two princes were to

form a covenant of alliance. The principal officer on the part of

Ch'i, however, despising Confucius as 'a man of ceremonies,

without courage,' had advised his sovereign to make the duke of

Lu a prisoner, and for this purpose a band of the half-savage

original inhabitants of the place advanced with weapons to the

stage where the two dukes were met. Confucius understood the

scheme, and said to the opposite party, 'Our two princes are met

for a pacific object. For you to bring a band of savage vassals to

disturb the meeting with their weapons, is not the way in which

Ch'i can expect to give law to the princes of the kingdom. These

barbarians have nothing to do with our Great Flowery land. Such

vassals may not interfere with our covenant. Weapons are out of

place at such a meeting. As before the spirits, such conduct is

unpropitious. In point of virtue, it is contrary to right. As

between man and man, it is not polite.' The duke of Ch'i ordered

the disturbers off, but Confucius withdrew, carrying the duke of

Lu with him. The business proceeded, notwithstanding, and when

the words of the alliance were being read on the part of Ch'i,-- '

So be it to Lu, if it contribute not 300 chariots of war to the help

of Ch'i, when its army goes across its borders,' a messenger from

Confucius added, 'And so be it to us, if we obey your orders,

unless you return to us the fields on the south of the Wan.' At the

conclusion of the ceremonies, the prince of Ch'i wanted to give a

grand entertainment, but Confucius demonstrated that such a

thing would be

1 左傳, 定公元年.

2 家語, Bk. I.

3 實其.

4 夾谷.

5 泰安府, 萊蕪縣.

contrary to the established rules of propriety, his real object

being to keep his sovereign out of danger. In this way the two

parties separated, they of Ch'i filled with shame at being foiled

and disgraced by 'the man of ceremonies;' and the result was that

the lands of Lu which had been appropriated by Ch'i were restored

[1].

For two years more Confucius held the office of minister of

Crime. Some have supposed that he was further raised to the

dignity of chief minister of the State [2], but that was not the

case. One instance of the manner in which he executed his

functions is worth recording. When any matter came before him,

he took the opinion of different individuals upon it, and in giving

judgment would say, 'I decide according to the view of so and so.'

There was an approach to our jury system in the plan, Confucius's

object being to enlist general sympathy, and carry the public

judgment with him in his administration of justice. A father

having brought some charge against his son, Confucius kept them

both in prison for three months, without making any difference in

favour of the father, and then wished to dismiss them both. The

head of the Chi was dissatisfied, and said, 'You are playing with

me, Sir minister of Crime. Formerly you told me that in a State or

a family filial duty was the first thing to be insisted on. What

hinders you now from putting to death this unfilial son as an

example to all the people?' Confucius with a sigh replied, 'When

superiors fail in their duty, and yet go to put their inferiors to

death, it is not right. This father has not taught his son to be

filial; to listen to his charge would be to slay the guiltless. The

manners of the age have been long in a sad condition; we cannot

expect the people not to be transgressing the laws [3].'

At this time two of his disciples, Tsze-lu and Tsze-yu,

entered the employment of the Chi family, and lent their

influence, the former especially, to forward the plans of their

master. One great cause of disorder in the State was the fortified

cities held by the three chiefs, in which they could defy the

supreme authority, and were in turn defied themselves by their

officers. Those cities were like the castles of the barons of

England in the time of the Norman

1 This meeting at Chia-ku is related in Sze-ma Ch'ien, the

'Narratives of the school,' and Ku-liang, with many exaggerations.

I have followed 左氏傳, 定公十年.

2 The 家語 says Bk. II, 孔子為魯司寇, 攝相事. But he was a 相 only in

the sense of an assistant of ceremonies, as at the meeting in

Chia-ku, described above.

3 See the 家語, Bk. II.

kings. Confucius had their destruction very much at heart, and

partly by the influence of persuasion, and partly by the assisting

counsels of Tsze-lu, he accomplished his object in regard to Pi

[1], the chief city of the Chi, and Hau [2], the chief city of the Shu.

It does not appear that he succeeded in the same way in

dismantling Ch'ang [3], the chief city of the Mang [4]; but his

authority in the State greatly increased. 'He strengthened the

ducal House and weakened the private Families. He exalted the

sovereign, and depressed the ministers. A transforming

government went abroad. Dishonesty and dissoluteness were

ashamed and hid their heads. Loyalty and good faith became the

characteristics of the men, and chastity and docility those of the

women. Strangers came in crowds from other States [5].'

Confucius became the idol of the people, and flew in songs

through their mouths [6].

But this sky of bright promise was soon overcast. As the

fame of the reformations in Lu went abroad, the neighboring

princes began to be afraid. The duke of Ch'i said, 'With Confucius

at the head of its government, Lu will become supreme among the

States, and Ch'i which is nearest to it will be the first swallowed

up. Let us propitiate it by a surrender of territory.' One of his

ministers proposed that they should first try to separate between

the sage and his sovereign, and to effect this, they hit upon the

following scheme. Eighty beautiful girls, with musical and

dancing accomplishments, and a hundred and twenty of the finest

horses that could be found, were selected, and sent as a present

to duke Ting. They were put up at first outside the city, and Chi

Hwan having gone in disguise to see them, forgot the lessons of

Confucius, and took the duke to look at the bait. They were both

captivated. The women were received, and the sage was

neglected. For three days the duke gave no audience to his

ministers. 'Master,' said Tsze-lu to Confucius, 'it is time for you

to be going.' But Confucius was very unwilling to leave. The spring

was coming on, when the sacrifice to Heaven would be offered,

and he determined to wait and see whether the

1 費.

2 郈.

3 成.

4 In connexion with these events, the 'Narratives of the School'

and Sze-ma Ch'ien mention the summary punishment inflicted by

Confucius on an able but unscrupulous and insidious officer the

Shaou chang, Maou (少正卯). His judgment and death occupy a

conspicuous place in the legendary accounts. But the Analects,

Tsze-sze, Mencius, and Tso Ch'iu-ming are all silent about it, and

Chiang Yung rightly rejects it as one of the many narratives

invented to exalt the sage.

5 See the 家語, Bk. II.

6 See 孔叢子, quoted by Chiang Yung.

solemnization of that would bring the duke back to his right mind.

No such result followed. The ceremony was hurried through, and

portions of the offerings were not sent round to the various

ministers, according to the established custom. Confucius

regretfully took his departure, going away slowly and by easy

stages [1]. He would have welcomed a message of recall. But the

duke continued in his abandonment, and the sage went forth to

thirteen weary years of homeless wandering.

8. On leaving Lu, Confucius first bent his steps westward to

the State of Wei, situate about where the present provinces of

Chih-li and Ho-nan adjoin.

[Sidebar] He wanders from State to State. B.C. 497-484.

He was now in his fifty-sixth year, and felt depressed and

melancholy. As he went along, he gave expression to his feelings

in verse:--

'Fain would I still look towards Lu,

But this Kwei hill cuts off my view.

With an axe, I'd hew the thickets through:--

Vain thought! 'gainst the hill I nought can do;'

and again,--

'Through the valley howls the blast,

Drizzling rain falls thick and fast.

Homeward goes the youthful bride,

O'er the wild, crowds by her side.

How is it, O azure Heaven,

From my home I thus am driven,

Through the land my way to trace,

With no certain dwelling-place?

Dark, dark; the minds of men!

Worth in vain comes to their ken.

Hastens on my term of years;

Old age, desolate, appears [2],'

A number of his disciples accompanied him, and his sadness

infected them. When they arrived at the borders of Wei at a place

called I, the warden sought an interview, and on coming out from

the sage, he tried to comfort the disciples, saying, 'My friends,

why are you distressed at your master's loss of office? The world

has been long without the principles of truth and right; Heaven is

going to use your master as a bell with its wooden tongue [3].'

Such was the thought of this friendly stranger. The bell did indeed

sound, but few had ears to hear.

1 史記, 孔子世家, p. 5. See also Mencius, V. Pt. II. i. 4.; et al.

2 See Chiang Yung's Life of Confucius, 去魯周遊考.

3 Ana. III. xxiv.

Confucius's fame, however, had gone before him, and he was

in little danger of having to suffer from want. On arriving at the

capital of Wei, he lodged at first with a worthy officer, named

Yen Ch'au-yu [1]. The reigning duke, known to us by the epithet of

Ling [2], was a worthless, dissipated man, but he could not

neglect a visitor of such eminence, and soon assigned to

Confucius a revenue of 60,000 measures of grain [3]. Here he

remained for ten months, and then for some reason left it to go to

Ch'an [4]. On the way he had to pass by K'wang [5], a place probably

in the present department of K'ai-fung in Ho-nan, which had

formerly suffered from Yang-hu. It so happened that Confucius

resembled Hu, and the attention of the people being called to him

by the movements of his carriage-driver, they thought it was

their old enemy, and made an attack upon him. His followers were

alarmed, but he was calm, and tried to assure them by declaring

his belief that he had a divine mission. He said to them, 'After the

death of king Wan, was not the cause of truth lodged here in me?

If Heaven had wished to let this cause of truth perish, then I, a

future mortal, should not have got such a relation to that cause.

While Heaven does not let the cause of truth perish, what can the

people of K'wang do to me [6]?' Having escaped from the hands of

his assailants, he does not seem to have carried out his purpose

of going to Ch'an, but returned to Wei.

On the way, he passed a house where he had formerly lodged,

and finding that the master was dead, and the funeral ceremonies

going on, he went in to condole and weep. When he came out, he

told Tsze-kung to take the outside horses from his carriage, and

give them as a contribution to the expenses of the occasion. 'You

never did such a thing,' Tsze-kung remonstrated, 'at the funeral of

any of your disciples; is it not too great a gift on this occasion of

the death of an old host?' 'When I went in,' replied Confucius, 'my

presence brought a burst of grief from the chief mourner, and I

joined him with my tears. I dislike the thought of my tears not

being followed by anything. Do it, my child [7].' On reaching Wei,

he lodged with Chu Po-yu, an officer of whom

1 顏讎由. See Mencius, V. Pt. I. viii. 2.

2. 靈公.

3 see the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 5.

4 陳國.

5. 匡.

6 Ana. IX. v. In Ana. XI. xxii, there is another reference to this

time, in which Yen Hui is made to appear.

7 See the Li Chi, II. Sect. I. ii. 16.

honourable mention is made in the Analects [1]. But this time he

did not remain long in the State. The duke was

[Sidebar] B.C. 495.

married to a lady of the house of Sung, known by the name of Nan-

tsze, notorious for her intrigues and wickedness. She sought an

interview with the sage, which he was obliged unwillingly to

accord [2]. No doubt he was innocent of thought or act of evil, but

it gave great dissatisfaction to Tsze-lu that his master should

have been in company with such a woman, and Confucius, to

assure him, swore an oath, saying, 'Wherein I have done

improperly, may Heaven reject me! May Heaven reject me [3]!' He

could not well abide, however, about such a court. One day the

duke rode out through the streets of his capital in the same

carriage with Nan-tsze, and made Confucius follow them in

another. Perhaps he intended to honour the philosopher, but the

people saw the incongruity, and cried out, 'Lust in the front;

virtue behind!' Confucius was ashamed, and made the observation,

'I have not seen one who loves virtue as he loves beauty [4].' Wei

was no place for him. He left it, and took his way towards Ch'an.

Ch'an, which formed part of the present province of Ho-nan,

lay south from Wei. After passing the small State of Ts'ao [5], he

approached the borders of Sung, occupying the present prefecture

of Kwei-teh, and had some intentions of entering it, when an

incident occurred, which it is not easy to understand from the

meagre style in which it is related, but which gave occasion to a

remarkable saying. Confucius was practising ceremonies with his

disciples, we are told, under the shade of a large tree. Hwan T'ui,

an ill-minded officer of Sung, heard of it, and sent a band of men

to pull down the tree, and kill the philosopher, if they could get

hold of him. The disciples were much alarmed, but Confucius

observed, 'Heaven has produced the virtue that is in me; what can

Hwan T'ui do to me [6]?' They all made their escape, but seem to

have been driven westwards to the State of Chang [7], on arriving

at the gate conducting into which from the east, Confucius found

himself separated from his followers. Tsze-kung had arrived

before him, and was told by a native of Chang that there was a

man standing by the east gate, with a forehead like Yao, a neck

like Kao-yao, his shoulders on a level with those of Tsze-ch'an,

but wanting, below the waist, three

1 Ana. XIV. xxvi; XV. vi.

2 See the account in the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 6.

3 Ana. VI. xxvi.

4 Ana. IX. xvii.

5 曹.

6 ana. IX. xxii.

7 鄭.

inches of the height of Yu, and altogether having the disconsolate

appearance of a stray dog.' Tsze-kung knew it was the master,

hastened to him, and repeated to his great amusement the

description which the man had given. 'The bodily appearance,' said

Confucius, 'is but a small matter, but to say I was like a stray

dog,-- capital! capital!' The stay they made at Chang was short,

and by the end of B.C. 495, Confucius was in Ch'an.

All the next year he remained there, lodging with the

warder of the city wall, an officer of worth, of the name of Chang

[2], and we have no accounts of him which deserve to be related

here [3].

In B.C. 494, Ch'an was much disturbed by attacks from Wu

[4], a large State, the capital of which was in the present

department of Su-chau, and Confucius determined to retrace his

steps to Wei. On the way he was laid hold of at a place called P'u

[5], which was held by a rebellious officer against Wei, and before

he could get away, he was obliged to engage that he would not

proceed thither. Thither, notwithstanding, he continued his route,

and when Tsze-kung asked him whether it was right to violate the

oath he had taken, he replied, 'It was a forced oath. The spirits do

not hear such [6].' 'The duke Ling received him with distinction,

but paid no more attention to his lessons than before, and

Confucius is said then to have uttered his complaint, 'If there

were any of the princes who would employ me, in the course of

twelve months I should have done something considerable. In

three years the government would be perfected [7].'

A circumstance occurred to direct his attention to the State

of Tsin [8], which occupied the southern part of the present Shan-

hsi, and extended over the Yellow river into Ho-nan. An invitation

came to Confucius, like that which he had formerly received from

Kung-shan Fu-zao. Pi Hsi, an officer of Tsin, who was holding the

town of Chung-mau against his chief, invited him to visit him,

and Confucius was inclined to go. Tsze-lu was always the mentor

on such occasions. He said to him, 'Master, I have heard you say,

1 See the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 6.

2 司城貞子. See Mencius, V. Pt. I. viii. 3.

3 Chiang Yung digests in this place two foolish stories,-- about a

large bone found in the State of Yueh, and a bird which appeared in

Ch'ia and died, shot through with a remarkable arrow. Confucius

knew all about them.

4 吳.

5 蒲.

6 This ia related by Sze-ma ch'ien 孔子世家, p. 7, and also in the

'Narratives of the School.' I would fain believe it is not true. The

wonder is, that no Chinese critic should have set about disproving

it.

7 Ana. XII. x.

8 晉.

that when a man in his own person is guilty of doing evil, a

superior man will not associate with him. Pi Hsi is in rebellion; if

you go to him, what shall be said?' Confucius replied, 'Yes, I did

use those words. But is it not said that if a thing be really hard,

it may be ground without being made thin; and if it be really

white, it may be steeped in a dark fluid without being made

black? Am I a bitter gourd? Am I to be hung up out of the way of

being eaten [1]?'

These sentiments sound strangely from his lips. After all,

he did not go to Pi Hsi; and having travelled as far as the Yellow

river that he might see one of the principal ministers of Tsin, he

heard of the violent death of two men of worth, and returned to

Wei, lamenting the fate which prevented him from crossing the

stream, and trying to solace himself with poetry as he had done

on leaving Lu. Again did he communicate with the duke, but as

ineffectually, and disgusted at being questioned by him about

military tactics, he left and went back to Ch'an.

He resided in Ch'an all the next year, B.C. 491, without

anything occurring there which is worthy of note [2]. Events had

transpired in Lu, however, which were to issue in his return to

his native State. The duke Ting had deceased B.C. 494, and Chi

Hwan, the chief of the Chi family, died in this year. On his death-

bed, he felt remorse for his conduct to Confucius, and charged his

successor, known to us in the Analects as Chi K'ang, to recall the

sage; but the charge was not immediately fulfilled. Chi K'ang, by

the advice of one of his officers, sent to Ch'an for the disciple

Yen Ch'iu instead. Confucius willingly sent him off, and would

gladly have accompanied him. 'Let me return!' he said, 'Let me

return [3]!' But that was not to be for several years yet.

In B.C. 490, accompanied, as usual, by several of his

disciples, he went from Ch'an to Ts'ai, a small dependency of the

great fief of Ch'u, which occupied a large part of the present

provinces of Hu-nan and Hu-pei. On the way, between Ch'an and

Ts'ai, their provisions became exhausted, and they were cut off

somehow from obtaining a fresh supply. The disciples were quite

overcome with want, and Tsze-lu said to the master, 'Has the

superior man indeed to endure in this way?' Confucius answered

him, 'The superior man may indeed have to endure want; but the

mean man

l Ana. XVII. vii.

2 Tso Ch'iu-ming, indeed, relates a story of Confucius, on the

report of a fire in Lu, telling whose ancestral temple had been

destroyed by it.

3 Ana. V. xxi.

when he is in want, gives way to unbridled license [1].' According

to the 'Narratives of the School,' the distress continued seven

days, during which time Confucius retained his equanimity, and

was even cheerful, playing on his lute and singing [2]. He retained,

however, a strong impression of the perils of the season, and we

find him afterwards recurring to it, and lamenting that of the

friends that were with him in Ch'an and Ts'ai, there were none

remaining to enter his door [3].

Escaped from this strait, he remained in Ts'ai over B.C. 489,

and in the following year we find him in Sheh, another district of

Ch'u, the chief of which had taken the title of duke, according to

the usurping policy of that State. Puzzled about his visitor, he

asked Tsze-lu what he should think of him, but the disciple did

not venture a reply. When Confucius heard of it, he said to Tsze-

lu. 'Why did you not say to him:-- He is simply a man who in his

eager pursuit of knowledge forgets his food, who in the joy of its

attainment forgets his sorrows, and who does not perceive that

old age is coming on [4]?' Subsequently, the duke, in conversation

with Confucius, asked him about government, and got the reply,

dictated by some circumstances of which we are ignorant, 'Good

government obtains, when those who are near are made happy, and

those who are far off are attracted [5]'

After a short stay in Sheh, according to Sze-ma Ch'ien, he

returned to Ts'ai, and having to dross a river, he sent Tsze-lu to

inquire for the ford of two men who were at work in a neighboring

field. They were recluses, men who had withdrawn from public

life in disgust at the waywardness of the times. One of them was

called Ch'ang-tsu, and instead of giving Tsze-lu the information

he wanted, he asked him, 'Who is it that holds the reins in the

carriage there?' 'It is K'ung Ch'iu.' 'K'ung Ch'iu of Lu?' 'Yes,' was

the reply, and then the man rejoined, 'He knows the ford.'

Tsze-lu applied to the other, who was called Chieh-ni, but

got for answer the question, 'Who are you, Sir?' He replied, 'I am

Chung Yu.' 'Chung Yu, who is the disciple of K'ung Ch'iu of Lu?'

'Yes,' again replied Tsze-lu, and Chieh-ni said to him, 'Disorder,

like a swelling flood, spreads over the whole kingdom,

1 Ana. XV. i. 2, 3.

2 家語, 卷二, 在危, 二十篇.

3 Ana. XI. ii.

4 Ana. VII. xviii.

5 Ana. XIII. xvi.

and who is he that will change it for you? Than follow one who

merely withdraws from this one and that one, had you not better

follow those who withdraw from the world altogether?' With this

he fell to covering up the seed, and gave no more heed to the

stranger. Tsze-lu went back and reported what they had said,

when Confucius vindicated his own course, saying. 'It is

impossible to associate with birds and beasts as if they were the

same with us. If I associate not with these people,-- with

mankind,-- with whom shall I associate? If right principles

prevailed through the kingdom, there would be no need for me to

change its state [1].'

About the same time he had an encounter with another

recluse, who was known as 'The madman of Ch'u.' He passed by the

carriage of Confucius, singing out, 'O phoenix, O phoenix, how is

your virtue degenerated! As to the past, reproof is useless, but

the future may be provided against. Give up, give up your vain

pursuit.' Confucius alighted and wished to enter into conversation

with him, but the man hastened away [2].

But now the attention of the ruler of Ch'u -- king, as he

styled himself -- was directed to the illustrious stranger who

was in his dominions, and he met Confucius and conducted him to

his capital, which was in the present district of I-ch'ang, in the

department of Hsiang-yang [3], in Hu-pei. After a time, he

proposed endowing the philosopher with a considerable territory,

but was dissuaded by his prime minister, who said to him, 'Has

your majesty any officer who could discharge the duties of an

ambassador like Tsze-kung? or any one so qualified for a premier

as Yen Hui? or any one to compare as a general with Tsze-lu? The

kings Wan and Wu, from their hereditary dominions of a hundred

li, rose to the sovereignty of the kingdom. If K'ung Ch'iu, with

such disciples to be his ministers, get the possession of any

territory, it will not be to the prosperity of Ch'u [4]? On this

remonstrance the king gave up his purpose; and, when he died in

the same year, Confucius left the State, and went back again to

Wei.

The duke Ling had died four years before, soon after

Confucius

[Sidebar] B.C. 489.

had last parted from him, and the reigning duke, known to us by

the title of Ch'u [5], was his grandson, and was holding the

principality against his own father. The relations

1 Ana. XVIII. vi.

2 Ana XVII. v.

3 襄陽府宜城縣.

4 See the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 10.

5 出公.

between them were rather complicated. The father had been

driven out in consequence of an attempt which he had instigated

on the life of his step-mother, the notorious Nan-tsze, and the

succession was given to his son. Subsequently, the father wanted

to reclaim what he deemed his right, and an unseemly struggle

ensued. The duke Ch'u was conscious how much his cause would be

strengthened by the support of Confucius, and hence when he got

to Wei, Tsze-lu could say to him, 'The prince of Wei has been

waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government;-

- what will you consider the first thing to be done [1]?' The

opinion of the philosopher, however, was against the propriety of

the duke's course [2], and he declined taking office with him,

though he remained in Wei for between five and six years. During

all that time there is a blank in his history. In the very year of his

return, according to the 'Annals of the Empire,' his most beloved

disciple, Yen Hui, died, on which occasion he exclaimed, 'Alas!

Heaven is destroying me! Heaven is destroying me [3]!' The death

of his wife is assigned to B.C. 484, but nothing else is related

which we can connect with this long period.

9. His return to Lu was brought about by the disciple Yen Yu,

who, we have seen, went into the service of Chi K'ang, in B.C. 491.

[Sidebar] From his return to Lu to his death. B.C. 484-478.

In the year B.C. 483, Yu had the conduct of some military

operations against Ch'i, and being successful, Chi K'ang asked him

how he had obtained his military skill;-- was it from nature, or

by learning? He replied that he had learned it from Confucius, and

entered into a glowing eulogy of the philosopher. The chief

declared that he would bring Confucius home again to Lu. 'If you

do so,' said the disciple, 'see that you do not let mean men come

between you and him.' On this K'ang sent three officers with

appropriate presents to Wei, to invite the wanderer home, and he

returned with them accordingly [4].

This event took place in the eleventh year of the duke Ai [5],

who succeeded to Ting, and according to K'ung Fu, Confucius's

descendant, the invitation proceeded from him [6]. We may

suppose that

1 Ana. XIII. iii. In the notes on this passage, I have given Chu Hsi's

opinion as to the time when Tsze-lu made this remark. It seems

more correct, however, to refer it to Confucius's return to Wei

from Ch'u, as is done by Chiang Yung.

2 Ana. VII. xiv.

3 Ana. XI. viii. In the notes on Ana. XI. vii, I have adverted to the

chronological difficulty connected with the dates assigned

respectively to the deaths of Yen Hui and Confucius's own son, Li.

Chiang Yung assigns Hui's death to B.C. 481.

4 See the 史記, 孔子世家.

5 哀公.

6 See Chiang Yung's memoir, in loc.

while Chi K'ang was the mover and director of the proceeding, it

was with the authority and approval of the duke. It is represented

in the chronicle of Tso Ch'iu-ming as having occurred at a very

opportune time. The philosopher had been consulted a little before

by K'ung Wan [1], an officer of Wei, about how he should conduct a

feud with another officer, and disgusted at being referred to on

such a subject, had ordered his carriage and prepared to leave the

State, exclaiming, 'The bird chooses its tree. The tree does not

choose the bird.' K'ung Wan endeavoured to excuse himself, and to

prevail on Confucius to remain in Wei, and just at this juncture

the messengers from Lu arrived [2].

Confucius was now in his sixty-ninth year. The world had

not dealt kindly with him. In every State which he had visited he

had met with disappointment and sorrow. Only five more years

remained to him, nor were they of a brighter character than the

past. He had, indeed, attained to that state, he tells us, in which

'he could follow what his heart desired without transgressing

what was right [3],' but other people were not more inclined than

they had been to abide by his counsels. The duke Ai and Chi K'ang

often conversed with him, but he no longer had weight in the

guidance of state affairs, and wisely addressed himself to the

completion of his literary labors. He wrote a preface, according

to Sze-ma Ch'ien, to the Shu-ching; carefully digested the rites

and ceremonies determined by the wisdom of the more ancient

sages and kings; collected and arranged the ancient poetry; and

undertook the reform of music [4]. He has told us himself. 'I

returned from Wei to Lu, and then the music was reformed, and

the pieces in the Songs of the Kingdom and Praise Songs found all

their proper place [5].' To the Yi-ching he devoted much study, and

Sze-ma Ch'ien says that the leather thongs by which the tablets

of his copy were bound together were thrice worn out. 'If some

years were added to my life,' he said, 'I would give fifty to the

study of the Yi, and then I might come to be without great faults

[6].' During this time also, we may suppose that he supplied Tsang

Shan with the materials of the classic of Filial Piety. The same

year that he returned, Chi Kang sent Yen Yu to ask his opinion

about an

1 孔文子, the same who is mentioned in the Analects, V. xiv.

2 See the 左傳, 哀公十一年.

3 Ana. II. iv. 6.

4 See the 史記, 孔子世家, p. 12.

5 Ana. IX. xiv.

6 Ana. VII. xvi.

additional impost which he wished to lay upon the people, but

Confucius refused to give any reply, telling the disciple privately

his disapproval of the proposed measure. It was carried out,

however, in the following year, by the agency of Yen, on which

occasion, I suppose, it was that Confucius said to the other

disciples, 'He is no disciple of mine; my little children, beat the

drum and assail him [1].' The year B.C. 483 was marked by the

death of his son Li, which he seems to have borne with more

equanimity than he did that of his disciple Yen Hui, which some

writers assign to the following year, though I have already

mentioned it under the year B.C. 489.

In the spring of B.C. 481, a servant of Chi K'ang caught a

Ch'i-lin on a hunting excursion of the duke in the present district

of Chia-hsiang [2]. No person could tell what strange animal it

was, and Confucius was called to look at it. He at once knew it to

be a lin, and the legend-writers say that it bore on one of its

horns the piece of ribbon, which his mother had attached to the

one that appeared to her before his birth. According to the

chronicle of Kung-yang, he was profoundly affected. He cried out,

'For whom have you come? For whom have you come?' His tears

flowed freely, and he added, 'The course of my doctrines is run

[3].'

Notwithstanding the appearance of the lin, the life of

Confucius was still protracted for two years longer, though he

took occasion to terminate with that event his history of the

Ch'un Ch'iu. This Work, according to Sze-ma Ch'ien, was altogether

the production of this year, but we heed not suppose that it was

so. In it, from the standpoint of Lu, he briefly indicates the

principal events occurring throughout the country, every term

being expressive, it is said, of the true character of the actors

and events described. Confucius said himself, 'It is the Spring and

Autumn which will make men know me, and it is the Spring and

Autumn which will make men condemn me [4].' Mencius makes the

composition of it to have been an achievement as great as Yu's

regulation of the waters of the deluge:-- 'Confucius completed

the Spring and Autumn, and rebellious ministers and villainous

sons were struck with terror [5].'

Towards the end of this year, word came to Lu that the duke

1 Ana. XI. xvi.

2 兗州府嘉祥縣.

3 公羊傳, 哀公十四年. According to Kung-yang, however, the lin was

found by some wood-gatherers.

4 Mencius III. Pt. II. ix. 8.

5 Mencius III. Pt. II. ix. 11.

of Ch'i had been murdered by one of his officers. Confucius was

moved with indignation. Such an outrage he felt, called for his

solemn interference. He bathed, went to court, and represented

the matter to the duke, saying, 'Ch'an Hang has slain his

sovereign, I beg that you will undertake to punish him.' The duke

pleaded his incapacity, urging that Lu was weak compared with

Ch'i, but Confucius replied, 'One half the people of Ch'i are not

consenting to the deed. If you add to the people of Lu one half the

people of Ch'i, you are sure to overcome.' But he could not infuse

his spirit into the duke, who told him to go and lay the matter

before the chiefs of the three Families. Sorely against his sense

of propriety, he did so, but they would not act, and he withdrew

with the remark, 'Following in the rear of the great officers, I did

not dare not to represent such a matter [1].'

In the year B.C. 479, Confucius had to mourn the death of

another of his disciples, one of those who had been longest with

him, the well-known Tsze-lu. He stands out a sort of Peter in the

Confucian school, a man of impulse, prompt to speak and prompt

to act. He gets many a check from the master, but there is

evidently a strong sympathy between them. Tsze-lu uses a

freedom with him on which none of the other disciples dares to

venture, and there is not one among them all, for whom, if I may

speak from my own feeling, the foreign student comes to form

such a liking. A pleasant picture is presented to us in one passage

of the Analects. It is said, 'The disciple Min was standing by his

side, looking bland and precise; Tsze-lu (named Yu), looking bold

and soldierly; Yen Yu and Tsze-kung, with a free and

straightforward manner. The master was pleased, but he

observed, "Yu there!-- he will not die a natural death [2]."'

This prediction was verified. When Confucius returned to Lu

from Wei, he left Tsze-lu and Tsze-kao [3] engaged there in

official service. Troubles arose. News came to Lu, B.C. 479, that a

revolution was in progress in Wei, and when Confucius heard it,

he said, 'Ch'ai will come here, but Yu will die [4].' So it turned out.

When Tsze-kao saw that matters were desperate he made his

escape, but Tsze-lu would not forsake the chief who had treated

1 See the 左傳, 哀公十四年 and Analects XIV. xxii.

2 Ana. XI. xii.

3 子羔, by surname Kao (高), and name Ch'ai (柴).

4 See the 左傳, 哀公十五年.

him well. He threw himself into the melee, and was slain.

Confucius wept sore for him, but his own death was not far off. It

took place on the eleventh day of the fourth month in the same

year, B.C. 479 [1]. Early one morning, we are told, he got up, and

with his hands behind his back, dragging his staff, he moved about

by his door, crooning over,--

'The great mountain must crumble;

The strong beam must break;

And the wise man wither away like a plant.'

After a little, he entered the house and sat down opposite

the door. Tsze-kung had heard his words, and said to himself, 'If

the great mountain crumble, to what shall I look up? If the strong

beam break, and the wise man wither away, on whom shall I lean?

The master, I fear, is going to be ill.' With this he hastened into

the house. Confucius said to him, 'Ts'ze, what makes you so late?

According to the statutes of Hsia, the corpse was dressed and

coffined at the top of the eastern steps, treating the dead as if he

were still the host. Under the Yin, the ceremony was performed

between the two pillars, as if the dead were both host and guest.

The rule of Chau is to perform it at the top of the western steps,

treating the dead as if he were a guest. I am a man of Yin, and last

night I dreamt that I was sitting with offerings before me

between the two pillars. No intelligent monarch arises; there is

not one in the kingdom that will make me his master. My time has

come to die.' So it was. He went to his couch, and after seven days

expired [2].

Such is the account which we have of the last hours of the

great philosopher of China. His end was not unimpressive, but it

was melancholy. He sank behind a cloud. Disappointed hopes made

his soul bitter. The great ones of the kingdom had not received his

teachings. No wife nor child was by to do the kindly offices of

affection for him. Nor were the expectations of another life

present with him as he passed through the dark valley. He uttered

no prayer, and he betrayed no apprehensions. Deep-treasured in

his own heart may have been the thought that he had endeavoured

to serve his generation by the will of God, but he gave no sign.

'The mountain falling came to nought, and the rock was removed

1 See the 左傳, 哀公十六年, and Chiang Yung's Life of Confucius, in

loc.

2 See the Li Chi, II, Sect. I. ii. 20.

out of his place. So death prevailed against him and he passed; his

countenance was changed, and he was sent away.'

10. I flatter myself that the preceding paragraphs contain a

more correct narrative of the principal incidents in the life of

Confucius than has yet been given in any European language. They

might easily have been expanded into a volume, but I did not wish

to exhaust the subject, but only to furnish a sketch, which, while

it might satisfy the general reader, would be of special

assistance to the careful student of the classical Books. I had

taken many notes of the manifest errors in regard to chronology

and other matters in the 'Narratives of the School,' and the

chapter of Sze-ma Ch'ien on the K'ung family, when the digest of

Chiang Yung, to which I have made frequent reference, attracted

my attention. Conclusions to which I had come were confirmed,

and a clue was furnished to difficulties which I was seeking to

disentangle. I take the opportunity to acknowledge here my

obligations to it. With a few notices of Confucius's habits and

manners, I shall conclude this section.

Very little can be gathered from reliable sources on the

personal appearance of the sage. The height of his father is

stated, as I have noted, to have been ten feet, and though

Confucius came short of this by four inches, he was often called

'the tall man.' It is allowed that the ancient foot or cubit was

shorter than the modem, but it must be reduced more than any

scholar I have consulted has yet done, to bring this statement

within the range of credibility. The legends assign to his figure

'nine-and-forty remarkable peculiarities [1],' a tenth part of

which would have made him more a monster than a man. Dr.

Morrison says that the images of him which he had seen in the

northern parts of China, represent him as of a dark, swarthy

colour [2]. It is not so with those common in the south. He was, no

doubt, in size and complexion much the same as many of his

descendants in the present day. Dr. Edkins and myself enjoyed the

services of two of those descendants, who acted as 'wheelers' in

the wheelbarrows which conveyed us from Ch'u-fau to a town on

the Grand Canal more than 250 miles off. They were strong,

capable men, both physically and mentally superior to their

companions.

1 四十九表.

2 Chinese and English Dictionary, char. 孔. Sir John Davis also

mentions seeing a figure of Confucius, in a temple near the Po-

yang lake, of which the complexion was 'quite black' (The Chinese,

vol. ii. p. 66).

But if his disciples had nothing to chronicle of his personal

appearance, they have gone very minutely into an account of many

of his habits. The tenth Book of the Analects is all occupied with

his deportment, his eating, and his dress. In public, whether in the

village, the temple, or the court, he was the man of rule and

ceremony, but 'at home he was not formal.' Yet if not formal, he

was particular. In bed even he did not forget himself;-- 'he did not

lie like a corpse,' and 'he did not speak.' 'He required his sleeping

dress to be half as long again as his body.' 'If he happened to be

sick, and the prince came to visit him, he had his face set to the

east, made his court robes be put over him, and drew his girdle

across them.'

He was nice in his diet,-- 'not disliking to have his rice

dressed fine, nor to have his minced meat cut small.' 'Anything at

all gone he would not touch.' 'He must have his meat cut properly,

and to every kind its proper sauce; but he was not a great eater.'

'It was only in drink that he laid down no limit to himself, but he

did not allow himself to be confused by it.' 'When the villagers

were drinking together, on those who carried staffs going out, he

went out immediately after.' There must always be ginger at the

table, and 'when eating, he did not converse.' 'Although his food

might be coarse rice and poor soup, he would offer a little of it in

sacrifice, with a grave, respectful air.'

'On occasion of a sudden clap of thunder, or a violent wind,

he would change countenance. He would do the same, and rise up

moreover, when he found himself a guest at a loaded board.' 'At

the sight of a person in mourning, he would also change

countenance, and if he happened to be in his carriage, he would

bend forward with a respectful salutation.' 'His general way in his

carriage was not to turn his head round, nor talk hastily, nor point

with his hands.' He was charitable. 'When any of his friends died,

if there were no relations who could be depended on for the

necessary offices, he would say, "I will bury him."

'The disciples were so careful to record these and other

characteristics of their master, it is said, because every act, of

movement or of rest, was closely associated with the great

principles which it was his object to inculcate. The detail of so

many small matters, however, hardly impresses a foreigner so

favourably. There rather seems to be a want of freedom about the

philosopher.

SECTION II.

HIS INFLUENCE AND OPINIONS.

1. Confucius died, we have seen, complaining that of all the

princes of the kingdom there was not one who would adopt his

[Sidebar] Homage rendered to Confucius by the sovereigns of

China.

principles and obey his lessons. He had hardly passed from the

stage of life, when his merit began to be acknowledged. When the

duke Ai heard of his death, he pronounced his eulogy in the words,

'Heaven has not left to me the aged man. There is none now to

assist me on the throne. Woe is me! Alas! O venerable Ni [1]!' Tsze-

kung complained of the inconsistency of this lamentation from

one who could not use the master when he was alive, but the

prince was probably sincere in his grief. He caused a temple to be

erected, and ordered that sacrifice should be offered to the sage,

at the four seasons of the year [2].

The sovereigns of the tottering dynasty of Chau had not the

intelligence, nor were they in a position, to do honour to the

departed philosopher, but the facts detailed in the first chapter

of these prolegomena, in connexion with the attempt of the

founder of the Ch'in dynasty to destroy the literary monuments of

antiquity, show how the authority of Confucius had come by that

time to prevail through the nation. The founder of the Han

dynasty, in passing through Lu, B.C. 195, visited his tomb and

offered the three victims in sacrifice to him. Other sovereigns

since then have often made pilgrimages to the spot. The most

famous temple in the empire now rises near the place of the

grave. The second and greatest of the rulers of the present

dynasty, in the twenty-third year of his reign, the K'ang-hsi

period, there set the example of kneeling thrice, and each time

laying his forehead thrice in the dust, before the image of the

sage.

In the year of our Lord 1, began the practice of conferring

honourary designations on Confucius by imperial authority. The

emperor Ping [3] then styled him-- 'The duke Ni, all-complete and

l Li Chi, II. Sect. I. iii. 43. This eulogy is found at greater length in

the 左傳, immediately after the notice of the sage's death.

2 See the 聖廟祀典圖考, 卷一, art. on Confucius. I am indebted to

this for most of the notices in this paragraph.

3 平帝.

illustrious [1].' This was changed, in A.D. 492, to-- 'The venerable

Ni, the accomplished Sage [2].' Other titles have supplanted this.

Shun-chih [3], the first of the Man-chau dynasty, adopted, in his

second year, A.D. 1645, the style, 'K'ung, the ancient Teacher,

accomplished and illustrious, all-complete, the perfect Sage [4];'

but twelve years later, a shorter title was introduced,-- 'K'ung,

the ancient Teacher, the perfect Sage [5].' Since that year no

further alteration has been made.

At first, the worship of Confucius was confined to the

country of Lu, but in A.D. 57 it was enacted that sacrifices should

be offered to him in the imperial college, and in all the colleges

of the principal territorial divisions throughout the empire. In

those sacrifices he was for some centuries associated with the

duke of Chau, the legislator to whom Confucius made frequent

reference, but in A.D. 609 separate temples were assigned to

them, and in 628 our sage displaced the older worthy altogether.

About the same time began the custom, which continues to the

present day, of erecting temples to him,-- separate structures, in

connexion with all the colleges, or examination-halls, of the

country.

The sage is not alone in those temples. In a hall behind the

principal one occupied by himself are the tablets -- in some

cases, the images -- of several of his ancestors, and other

worthies; while associated with himself are his principal

disciples, and many who in subsequent times have signalized

themselves as expounders and exemplifiers of his doctrines. On

the first day of every month, offerings of fruits and vegetables

are set forth, and on the fifteenth there is a solemn burning of

incense. But twice a year, in the middle months of spring and

autumn, when the first ting day [6] of the month comes round, the

worship of Confucius is performed with peculiar solemnity. At

the imperial college the emperor himself is required to attend in

state, and is in fact the principal performer. After all the

preliminary arrangements have been made, and the emperor has

twice knelt and six times bowed his head to the earth, the

presence of Confucius's spirit is invoked in the words, 'Great art

thou, O perfect sage! Thy virtue is full; thy doctrine is complete.

Among mortal men there has not been thine equal. All kings

honour thee. Thy statutes and laws have come gloriously

1 成宣尼公.

2 文聖尼父.

3 順治.

4 大成至聖, 文宣尼師, 孔子

5 至聖先師孔子

6 上丁日

down. Thou art the pattern in this imperial school. Reverently

have the sacrificial vessels been set out. Full of awe, we sound

our drums and bells [1].'

The spirit is supposed now to be present, and the service

proceeds through various offerings, when the first of which has

been set forth, an officer reads the following [2], which is the

prayer on the occasion:-- 'On this ... month of this ... year, I, A.B.,

the emperor, offer a sacrifice to the philosopher K'ung, the

ancient Teacher, the perfect Sage, and say,-- O Teacher, in virtue

equal to Heaven and Earth, whose doctrines embrace the past time

and the present, thou didst digest and transmit the six classics,

and didst hand down lessons for all generations! Now in this

second month of spring (or autumn), in reverent observance of the

old statutes, with victims, silks, spirits, and fruits, I carefully

offer sacrifice to thee. With thee are associated the philosopher

Yen, Continuator of thee; the philosopher Tsang, Exhibiter of thy

fundamental principles; the philosopher Tsze-sze, Transmitter of

thee; and the philosopher Mang, Second to thee. May'st thou enjoy

the offerings!'

I need not go on to enlarge on the homage which the

emperors of China render to Confucius. It could not be more

complete. He was unreasonably neglected when alive. He is now

unreasonably venerated when dead.

2. The rulers of China are not singular in this matter, but in

entire sympathy with the mass of their people. It is the

distinction

[Sidebar] General appreciation of Confucius.

of this empire that education has been highly prized in it from the

earliest times. It was so before the era of Confucius, and we may

be sure that the system met with his approbation. One of his

remarkable sayings was,-- 'To lead an uninstructed people to war

is to throw them away [3].' When he pronounced this judgment, he

was not thinking of military training, but of education in the

duties of life and citizenship. A people so taught, he thought,

would be morally fitted to fight for their government. Mencius,

when lecturing to the ruler of T'ang on the proper way of

governing a kingdom, told him that he must provide the means of

education for all, the poor as well as the rich. 'Establish,' said he,

'hsiang, hsu, hsio, and hsiao,-- all those educational

institutions,-- for the instruction of the people [4].'

1 2 See the 大清通禮卷十二.

3 Ana. XIII. xxx.

4 Mencius III. Pt. I. iii. 10.

At the present day, education is widely diffused throughout

China. In few other countries is the schoolmaster more abroad,

and in all schools it is Confucius who is taught. The plan of

competitive examinations, and the selection for civil offices only

from those who have been successful candidates,-- good so far as

the competition is concerned, but injurious from the restricted

range of subjects with which an acquaintance is required,-- have

obtained for more than twelve centuries. The classical works are

the text books. It is from them almost exclusively that the

themes proposed to determine the knowledge and ability of the

students are chosen. The whole of the magistracy of China is thus

versed in all that is recorded of the sage, and in the ancient

literature which he preserved. His thoughts are familiar to every

man in authority, and his character is more or less reproduced in

him.

The official civilians of China, numerous as they are, are

but a fraction of its students, and the students, or those who

make literature a profession, are again but a fraction of those

who attend school for a shorter or longer period. Yet so far as the

studies have gone, they have been occupied with the Confucian

writings. In the schoolrooms there is a tablet or inscription on

the wall, sacred to the sage, and every pupil is required, on

coming to school on the morning of the first and fifteenth of

every month, to bow before it, the first thing, as an act of

reverence [1]. Thus all in China who receive the slightest tincture

of learning do so at the fountain of Confucius. They learn of him

and do homage to him at once. I have repeatedly quoted the

statement that during his life-time he had three thousand

disciples. Hundreds of millions are his disciples now. It is hardly

necessary to make any allowance in this statement for the

followers of Taoism and Buddhism, for, as Sir John Davis has

observed, 'whatever the other opinions or faith of a Chinese may

be, he takes good care to treat Confucius with respect [2].' For

two thousand years he has reigned supreme, the undisputed

teacher of this most populous land.

3. This position and influence of Confucius are to be

ascribed, I conceive, chiefly to two causes:-- his being the

preserver, namely of

l During the present dynasty, the tablet of 文昌帝君, the god of

literature, has to a considerable extent displaced that of

Confucius in schools. Yet the worship of him does not clash with

that of the other. He is 'the father' of composition only.

2 The Chinese, vol. ii. p. 45.

the monuments of antiquity, and the exemplifier and expounder of

[Sidebar] The causes of his influence.

the maxims of the golden age of China; and the devotion to him of

his immediate disciples and their early followers. The national

and the personal are thus blended in him, each in its highest

degree of excellence. He was a Chinese of the Chinese; he is also

represented as, and all now believe him to have been, the beau

ideal of humanity in its best and noblest estate.

4. It may be well to bring forward here Confucius's own

estimate of himself and of his doctrines. It will serve to

illustrate the

[Sidebar] His own estimate of himself and of his doctrines.

statements just made. The following are some of his sayings:--

'The sage and the man of perfect virtue;-- how dare I rank myself

with them? It may simply be said of me, that I strive to become

such without satiety, and teach others without weariness.' 'In

letters I am perhaps equal to other men; but the character of the

superior man, carrying out in his conduct what he professes, is

what I have not yet attained to.' 'The leaving virtue without

proper cultivation; the not thoroughly discussing what is learned;

not being able to move towards righteousness of which a

knowledge is gained; and not being able to change what is not

good;-- these are the things which occasion me solicitude.' 'I am

not one who was born in the possession of knowledge; I am one

who is fond of antiquity and earnest in seeking it there.' 'A

transmitter and not a maker, believing in and loving the ancients,

I venture to compare myself with our old P'ang [1].'

Confucius cannot be thought to speak of himself in these

declarations more highly than he ought to do. Rather we may

recognise in them the expressions of a genuine humility. He was

conscious that personally he came short in many things, but he

toiled after the character, which he saw, or fancied that he saw,

in the ancient sages whom he acknowledged; and the lessons of

government and morals which he labored to diffuse were those

which had already been inculcated and exhibited by them.

Emphatically he was 'a transmitter and not a maker.' It is not to

be understood that he was not fully satisfied of the truth of the

principles which he had learned. He held them with the full

approval and consent of his own understanding. He believed that if

they were acted on, they would remedy the evils of his time.

1 All these passages are taken from the seventh Book of the

Analects. See chapters xxxiii, xxxii, iii, xix, and i.

There was nothing to prevent rulers like Yao and Shun and the

great Yu from again arising, and a condition of happy tranquillity

being realized throughout the kingdom under their sway.

If in anything he thought himself 'superior and alone,' having

attributes which others could not claim, it was in his possessing

a divine commission as the conservator of ancient truth and rules.

He does not speak very definitely on this point. It is noted that

'the appointments of Heaven was one of the subjects on which he

rarely touched [1].' His most remarkable utterance was that which

I have already given in the sketch of his Life:-- 'When he was put

in fear in K'wang, he said, "After the death of king Wan, was not

the cause of truth lodged here in me? If Heaven had wished to let

this cause of truth perish, then I, a future mortal, should not have

got such a relation to that cause. While Heaven does not let the

cause of truth perish, what can the people of K'wang do to me

[2]?"' Confucius, then, did feel that he was in the world for a

special purpose. But it was not to announce any new truths, or to

initiate any new economy. It was to prevent what had previously

been known from being lost. He followed in the wake of Yao and

Shun, of T'ang, and king Wan. Distant from the last by a long

interval of time, he would have said that he was distant from him

also by a great inferiority of character, but still he had learned

the principles on which they all happily governed the country, and

in their name he would lift up a standard against the prevailing

lawlessness of his age.

5. The language employed with reference to Confucius by his

disciples and their early followers presents a striking contrast

with his own.

[Sidebar] Estimate of him by his disciples and their early

followers.

I have already, in writing of the scope and value of 'The Doctrine

of the Mean,' called attention to the extravagant eulogies of his

grandson Tsze-sze. He only followed the example which had been

set by those among whom the philosopher went in and out. We

have the language of Yen Yuan, his favourite, which is

comparatively moderate, and simply expresses the genuine

admiration of a devoted pupil [3]. Tsze-kung on several occasions

spoke in a different style. Having heard that one of the chiefs of

Lu had said that he himself -- Tsze-kung -- was superior to

Confucius, he observed, 'Let me use the comparison of a house and

its encompassing wall. My wall

1 Ana. IX. i.

2 Ana. IX. iii.

3 Ana. IX. x.

only reaches to the shoulders. One may peep over it, and see

whatever is valuable in the apartments. The wall of my master is

several fathoms high. If one do not find the door and enter by it,

he cannot see the rich ancestral temple with its beauties, nor all

the officers in their rich array. But I may assume that they are

few who find the door. The remark of the chief was only what

might have been expected [1]'

Another time, the same individual having spoken revilingly

of Confucius, Tsze-kung said, 'It is of no use doing so. Chung-ni

cannot be reviled. The talents and virtue of other men are hillocks

and mounds which may be stepped over. Chung-ni is the sun or

moon, which it is not possible to step over. Although a man may

wish to cut himself off from the sage, what harm can he do to the

sun and moon? He only shows that he does not know his own

capacity [2].'

In conversation with a fellow-disciple, Tsze-kung took a

still higher flight. Being charged by Tsze-ch'in with being too

modest, for that Confucius was not really superior to him, he

replied, 'For one word a man is often deemed to be wise, and for

one word he is often deemed to be foolish. We ought to be careful

indeed in what we say. Our master cannot be attained to, just in

the same way as the heavens cannot be gone up to by the steps of

a stair. Were our master in the position of the prince of a State,

or the chief of a Family, we should find verified the description

which has been given of a sage's rule:-- He would plant the

people, and forthwith they would be established; he would lead

them on, and forthwith they would follow him; he would make

them happy, and forthwith multitudes would resort to his

dominions; he would stimulate them, and forthwith they would be

harmonious. While he lived, he would be glorious. When he died, he

would be bitterly lamented. How is it possible for him to be

attained to [3]?'

From these representations of Tsze-kung, it was not a

difficult step for Tsze-sze to take in exalting Confucius not only

to the level of the ancient sages, but as 'the equal of Heaven.' And

Mencius took up the theme. Being questioned by Kung-sun Ch'au,

one of his disciples, about two acknowledged sages, Po-i and I

Yin, whether they were to be placed in the same rank with

Confucius, he replied, 'No. Since there were living men until now,

there never was another Confucius;' and then he proceeded to

fortify his

1 Ana. XIX. xxiii.

2 Ana. XIX. xxiv.

3 Ana. XIX. xxv.

opinion by the concurring testimony of Tsai Wo, Tsze-kung, and Yu

Zo, who all had wisdom, he thought, sufficient to know their

master. Tsai Wo's opinion was, 'According to my view of our

master, he is far superior to Yao and Shun.' Tsze-kung said, 'By

viewing the ceremonial ordinances of a prince, we know the

character of his government. By hearing his music, we know the

character of his virtue. From the distance of a hundred ages after,

I can arrange, according to their merits, the kings of those

hundred ages;-- not one of them can escape me. From the birth of

mankind till now, there has never been another like our master.'

Yu Zo said, 'Is it only among men that it is so? There is the ch'i-

lin among quadrupeds; the fung-hwang among birds; the T'ai

mountain among mounds and ant-hills; and rivers and seas among

rainpools. Though different in degree, they are the same in kind.

So the sages among mankind are also the same in kind. But they

stand out from their fellows, and rise above the level; and from

the birth of mankind till now, there never has been one so

complete as Confucius [1].' I will not indulge in farther

illustration. The judgment of the sage's disciples, of Tsze-sze,

and of Mencius, has been unchallenged by the mass of the scholars

of China. Doubtless it pleases them to bow down at the shrine of

the Sage, for their profession of literature is thereby glorified. A

reflection of the honour done to him falls upon themselves. And

the powers that be, and the multitudes of the people, fall in with

the judgment. Confucius is thus, in the empire of China, the one

man by whom all possible personal excellence was exemplified,

and by whom all possible lessons of social virtue and political

wisdom are taught.

6. The reader will be prepared by the preceding account not

to expect to find any light thrown by Confucius on the great

problems of the human condition and destiny. He did not speculate

on the creation of things or the end of them. He was not troubled

to account for the origin of man, nor did he seek to know about his

hereafter. He meddled neither with physics nor metaphysics [2].

[Sidebar] Subjects on which Confucius did not treat.-- That he

was unreligious, unspiritual, and open to the charge of

insincerity.

The testimony of the Analects about the subjects of his teaching

is the following:-- 'His frequent themes of discourse were the

Book

1 Mencius, II. Pt. I. ii. 23-28.

2 'The contents of the Yi-ching, and Confucius's labors upon it,

may be objected in opposition to this statement, and I must be

understood to make it with come reservation. Six years ago, I

spent all my leisure time for twelve months in the study of that

Work, and wrote out a translation of it, but at the close I was

only groping my way in darkness to lay hold of [footnote continued

next page].

of Poetry, the Book of History, and the maintenance of the rules

of Propriety.' 'He taught letters, ethics, devotion of soul, and

truthfulness.' 'Extraordinary things; feats of strength; states of

disorder; and spiritual beings, he did not like to talk about [1].'

Confucius is not to be blamed for his silence on the

subjects here indicated. His ignorance of them was to a great

extent his misfortune. He had not learned them. No report of them

had come to him by the ear; no vision of them by the eye. And to

his practical mind the toiling of thought amid uncertainties

seemed worse than useless.

The question has, indeed, been raised, whether he did not

make changes in the ancient creed of China [2], but I cannot

believe that he did so consciously and designedly. Had his

idiosyncrasy been different, we might have had expositions of the

ancient views on some points, the effect of which would have

been more beneficial than the indefiniteness in which they are

now left, and it may be doubted so far, whether Confucius was not

unfaithful to his guides. But that he suppressed or added, in order

to bring in articles of belief originating with himself, is a thing

not to be charged against him.

I will mention two important subjects in regard to which

there is a conviction in my mind that he came short of the faith

of the older sages. The first is the doctrine of God. This name is

common in the Shih-ching and Shu-ching. Ti or Shang-Ti appears

there as a personal being, ruling in heaven and on earth, the

author of man's moral nature, the governor among the nations, by

whom kings reign and princes decree justice, the rewarder of the

good, and the punisher of the bad. Confucius preferred to speak of

Heaven. Instances have already been given of this. Two others may

be cited:-- 'He who offends against Heaven has none to whom he

can pray [3]?' 'Alas! ' said he, 'there is no one that knows me.'

Tsze-kung said, 'What do you mean by thus saying that no one

knows you?' He replied, 'I do not murmur against Heaven. I do

[footnote continued from previous page] its scope and meaning,

and up to this time I have not been able to master it so as to

speak positively about it. It will come in due time, in its place, in

the present Publication, and I do not think that what I here say of

Confucius will require much, if any, modification.' So I wrote in

1861; and I at last accomplished a translation of the Yi, which

was published in 1882, as the sixteenth volume of 'The Sacred

Books of 'the East.' I should like to bring out a revision of that

version, with the Chinese text, so as to make it uniform with the

volumes of the Classics previously published. But as Yang Ho said

to Confucius, 'The years do not wait for us.'

1 Ana. VII. xvii; xxiv; xx.

2 See Hardwick's 'Christ and other Masters,' Part iii, pp. 18, 19,

with his reference in a note to a passage from Meadows's 'The

Chinese and their Rebellions.'

3 Ana. III. xiii.

not grumble against men. My studies lie low, and my penetration

rises high. But there is Heaven;-- THAT knows me [1]!' Not once

throughout the Analects does he use the personal name. I would

say that he was unreligious rather than irreligious; yet by the

coldness of his temperament and intellect in this matter, his

influence is unfavourable to the development of ardent religious

feeling among the Chinese people generally; and he prepared the

way for the speculations of the literati of medieval and modern

times, which have exposed them to the charge of atheism.

Secondly, Along with the worship of God there existed in

China, from the earliest historical times, the worship of other

spiritual beings,-- especially, and to every individual, the

worship of departed ancestors. Confucius recognised this as an

institution to be devoutly observed. 'He sacrificed to the dead as

if they were present; he sacrificed to the spirits as if the spirits

were present. He said. "I consider my not being present at the

sacrifice as if I did not sacrifice [2]."' The custom must have

originated from a belief in the continued existence of the dead.

We cannot suppose that they who instituted it thought that with

the cessation of this life on earth there was a cessation also of

all conscious being. But Confucius never spoke explicitly on this

subject. He tried to evade it. 'Chi Lu asked about serving the

spirits of the dead, and the master said, "While you are not able

to serve men, how can you serve their spirits?" The disciple

added, "I venture to ask about death," and he was answered, "While

you do not know life, how can you know about death [3]."' Still

more striking is a conversation with another disciple, recorded in

the 'Narratives of the School.' Tsze-kung asked him, saying, 'Do

the dead have knowledge (of our services, that is), or are they

without knowledge?' The master replied, 'If I were to say that the

dead have such knowledge, I am afraid that filial sons and dutiful

grandsons would injure their substance in paying the last offices

to the departed; and if I were to say that the dead have not such

knowledge, I am afraid lest unfilial sons should leave their

parents unburied. You need not wish, Tsze, to know whether the

dead have knowledge or not. There is no present urgency about the

point. Hereafter you will know it for yourself [4].' Surely this was

not the teaching proper to a sage.

1 Ana. XIV. xxxvii.

2 Ana. III. xii.

3 Ana. XI. xi.

4 家語, 卷二, art. 致思, towards the end.

He said on one occasion that he had no concealments from his

disciples [1]. Why did he not candidly tell his real thoughts on so

interesting a subject? I incline to think that he doubted more

than he believed. If the case were not so, it would be difficult to

account for the answer which he returned to a question as to

what constituted wisdom:-- 'To give one's self earnestly,' said

he, 'to the duties due to men, and, while respecting spiritual

beings, to keep aloof from them, may be called wisdom [2].' At any

rate, as by his frequent references to Heaven, instead of

following the phraseology of the older sages, he gave occasion to

many of his professed followers to identify God with a principle

of reason and the course of nature; so, in the point now in hand, he

has led them to deny, like the Sadducees of old, the existence of

any spirit at all, and to tell us that their sacrifices to the dead

are but an outward form, the mode of expression which the

principle of filial piety requires them to adopt when its objects

have departed this life.

It will not be supposed that I wish to advocate or to defend

the practice of sacrificing to the dead. My object has been to

point out how Confucius recognised it, without acknowledging the

faith from which it must have originated, and how he enforced it

as a matter of form or ceremony. It thus connects itself with the

most serious charge that can be brought against him,-- the charge

of insincerity. Among the four things which it is said he taught,

'truthfulness' is specified [3], and many sayings might be quoted

from him, in which 'sincerity' is celebrated as highly and

demanded as stringently as ever it has been by any Christian

moralist; yet he was not altogether the truthful and true man to

whom we accord our highest approbation. There was the case of

Mang Chih-fan, who boldly brought up the rear of the defeated

troops of Lu, and attributed his occupying the place of honour to

the backwardness of his horse. The action was gallant, but the

apology for it was weak and unnecessary. And yet Confucius saw

nothing in the whole but matter for praise [4]. He could excuse

himself from seeing an unwelcome visitor on the ground that he

was sick, when there was nothing the matter with him [5]. These

were small matters, but what shall we say to the incident which

I have given in the sketch of his Life, p. 79,-- his deliberately

breaking the oath which he had sworn, simply on the ground that

it had been forced from him?

1 Ana. VII. xxiii.

2 Ana. VI. xx.

3 See above, near the beginning of this paragraph.

4 Ana. VI. xiii.

5 Am. XVII. xx.

I should be glad if I could find evidence on which to deny the truth

of that occurrence. But it rests on the same authority as most

other statements about him, and it is accepted as a fact by the

people and scholars of China. It must have had, and it must still

have, a very injurious influence upon them. Foreigners charge a

habit of deceitfulness upon the nation and its government;-- on

the justice or injustice of this charge I say nothing. For every

word of falsehood and every act of insincerity, the guilty party

must bear his own burden, but we cannot but regret the example

of Confucius in this particular. It is with the Chinese and their

sage, as it was with the Jews of old and their teachers. He that

leads them has caused them to err, and destroyed the way of their

paths [1].

But was not insincerity a natural result of the un-religion

of Confucius? There are certain virtues which demand a true

piety in order to their flourishing in the heart of man. Natural

affection, the feeling of loyalty, and enlightened policy, may do

much to build up and preserve a family and a state, but it requires

more to maintain the love of truth, and make a lie, spoken or

acted, to be shrunk from with shame. It requires in fact the living

recognition of a God of truth, and all the sanctions of revealed

religion. Unfortunately the Chinese have not had these, and the

example of him to whom they bow down as the best and wisest of

men, does not set them against dissimulation.

7. I go on to a brief discussion of Confucius's views on

government, or what we may call his principles of political

science. It

[sidebar] His views on government.

could not be in his long intercourse with his disciples but that he

should enunciate many maxims bearing on character and morals

generally, but he never rested in the improvement of the

individual. 'The kingdom, the world, brought to a state of happy

tranquillity [2],' was the grand object which he delighted to think

of; that it might be brought about as easily as 'one can look upon

the palm of his hand,' was the dream which it pleased him to

indulge [3]. He held that there was in men an adaptation and

readiness to be governed, which only needed to be taken advantage

of in the proper way. There must be the right administrators, but

given those, and 'the growth of government would be rapid, just

as vegetation is rapid in the earth; yea, their

1 Isaiah iii. 12.

2 天下平. See the 大學, 經, pars. 4, 5; &c.

3 Ana. III. xi; et al.

government would display itself like an easily-growing rush [1].'

The same sentiment was common from the lips of Mencius.

Enforcing it one day, when conversing with one of the petty rulers

of his time, he said in his peculiar style, 'Does your Majesty

understand the way of the growing grain? During the seventh and

eighth months, when drought prevails, the plants become dry.

Then the clouds collect densely in the heavens; they send down

torrents of rain, and the grain erects itself as if by a shoot. When

it does so, who can keep it back [2]?' Such, he contended, would be

the response of the mass of the people to any true 'shepherd of

men.' It may be deemed unnecessary that I should specify this

point, for it is a truth applicable to the people of all nations.

Speaking generally, government is by no device or cunning

craftiness; human nature demands it. But in no other family of

mankind is the characteristic so largely developed as in the

Chinese. The love of order and quiet, and a willingness to submit

to 'the powers that be,' eminently distinguish them. Foreign

writers have often taken notice of this, and have attributed it to

the influence of Confucius's doctrines as inculcating

subordination; but it existed previous to his time. The character

of the people molded his system, more than it was molded by it.

This readiness to be governed arose, according to Confucius,

from 'the duties of universal obligation, or those between

sovereign and minister, between father and son, between husband

and wife, between elder brother and younger, and those belonging

to the intercourse of friends [3].' Men as they are born into the

world, and grow up in it, find themselves existing in those

relations. They are the appointment of Heaven. And each relation

has its reciprocal obligations, the recognition of which is proper

to the Heaven-conferred nature. It only needs that the sacredness

of the relations be maintained, and the duties belonging to them

faithfully discharged, and the 'happy tranquillity' will prevail all

under heaven. As to the institutions of government, the laws and

arrangements by which, as through a thousand channels, it should

go forth to carry plenty and prosperity through the length and

breadth of the country, it did not belong to Confucius, 'the

throneless king,' to set them forth minutely. And indeed they were

existing in the records of 'the ancient sovereigns.' Nothing new

was needed. It was only

1 中庸, xx. 3.

2 Mencius, I. Pt. I. vi. 6.

3 中庸, xx. 8.

requisite to pursue the old paths, and raise up the old standards.

'The government of Wan and Wu,' he said, 'is displayed in the

records,-- the tablets of wood and bamboo. Let there be the men,

and the government will flourish; but without the men, the

government decays and ceases [1].' To the same effect was the

reply which he gave to Yen Hui when asked by him how the

government of a State should be administered. It seems very wide

of the mark, until we read it in the light of the sage's veneration

for ancient ordinances, and his opinion of their sufficiency.

'Follow,' he said, 'the seasons of Hsia. Ride in the state carriages

of Yin. Wear the ceremonial cap of Chau. Let the music be the Shao

with its pantomimes. Banish the songs of Chang, and keep far

from specious talkers [2].'

Confucius's idea then of a happy, well-governed State did

not go beyond the flourishing of the five relations of society

which have been mentioned; and we have not any condensed

exhibition from him of their nature, or of the duties belonging to

the several parties in them. Of the two first he spoke frequently,

but all that he has said on the others would go into small

compass. Mencius has said that 'between father and son there

should be affection; between sovereign and minister

righteousness; between husband and wife attention to their

separate functions; between old and young, a proper order; and

between friends, fidelity [3].' Confucius, I apprehend, would

hardly have accepted this account. It does not bring out

sufficiently the authority which he claimed for the father and the

sovereign, and the obedience which he exacted from the child and

the minister. With regard to the relation of husband and wife, he

was in no respect superior to the preceding sages who had

enunciated their views of 'propriety' on the subject. We have a

somewhat detailed exposition of his opinions in the 'Narratives of

the School.'-- 'Man,' said he, 'is the representative of Heaven, and

is supreme over all things. Woman yields obedience to the

instructions of man, and helps to carry out his principles [4]. On

this account she can determine nothing of herself, and is subject

to the rule of the three obediences. When young, she must obey her

father and elder brother; when married, she must obey her

husband;

1 中庸, xx. 2.

2 Ana. XV. x.

3 Mencius, III. Pt. I. iv. 8.

4 男子者, 任天道而長萬物者也; 女子者, 順男子之道, 而長其理者也.

when her husband is dead, she must obey her son. She may not

think of marrying a second time. No instructions or orders must

issue from the harem. Woman's business is simply the preparation

and supplying of drink and food. Beyond the threshold of her

apartments she should not be known for evil or for good. She may

not cross the boundaries of the State to attend a funeral. She may

take no step on her own motion, and may come to no conclusion on

her own deliberation. There are five women who are not to be

taken in marriage:-- the daughter of a rebellious house; the

daughter of a disorderly house; the daughter of a house which has

produced criminals for more than one generation; the daughter of

a leprous house; and the daughter who has lost her father and

elder brother. A wife may be divorced for seven reasons, which,

however, may be overruled by three considerations. The grounds

for divorce are disobedience to her husband's parents; not giving

birth to a son; dissolute conduct; jealousy-- (of her husband's

attentions, that is, to the other inmates of his harem);

talkativeness; and thieving. The three considerations which may

overrule these grounds are-- first, if, while she was taken from a

home, she has now no home to return to; second, if she have

passed with her husband through the three years' mourning for his

parents; third, if the husband have become rich from being poor.

All these regulations were adopted by the sages in harmony with

the natures of man and woman, and to give importance to the

ordinance of marriage [1].'

With these ideas of the relations of society, Confucius

dwelt much on the necessity of personal correctness of character

on the part of those in authority, in order to secure the right

fulfillment of the duties implied in them. This is one grand

peculiarity of his teaching. I have adverted to it in the review of

'The Great Learning,' but it deserves some further exhibition, and

there are three conversations with the chief Chi K'ang in which it

is very expressly set forth. 'Chi K'ang asked about government,

and Confucius replied, "To govern means to rectify. If you lead on

the people with correctness, who will dare not to be correct?"'

'Chi K'ang, distressed about the number of thieves in the State,

inquired of Confucius about how to do away with them. Confucius

said, "If you, sir, were not covetous, though you should reward

them to do it, they would not steal."' 'Chi K'ang asked about

government,

1 家語卷三, 本命解

saying, "What do you say to killing the unprincipled for the good

of the principled?" Confucius replied, "Sir, in carrying on your

government, why should you use killing at all? Let your evinced

desires be for what is good, and the people will be good. The

relation between superiors and inferiors is like that between the

wind and the grass. The grass must bend, when the wind blows

across it [1]."'

Example is not so powerful as Confucius in these and many

other passages represented it, but its influence is very great. Its

virtue is recognised in the family, and it is demanded in the

church of Christ. 'A bishop'-- and I quote the term with the simple

meaning of overseer-- 'must be blameless.' It seems to me,

however, that in the progress of society in the West we have

come to think less of the power of example in many departments

of state than we ought to do. It is thought of too little in the

army and the navy. We laugh at the 'self-denying ordinance,' and

the 'new model' of 1644, but there lay beneath them the principle

which Confucius so broadly propounded,-- the importance of

personal virtue in all who are in authority. Now that Great Britain

is the governing power over the masses of India and that we are

coming more and more into contact with tens of thousands of the

Chinese, this maxim of our sage is deserving of serious

consideration from all who bear rule, and especially from those

on whom devolves the conduct of affairs. His words on the

susceptibility of the people to be acted on by those above them

ought not to prove as water spilt on the ground.

But to return to Confucius.-- As he thus lays it down that

the mainspring of the well-being of society is the personal

character of the ruler, we look anxiously for what directions he

has given for the cultivation of that. But here he is very

defective. 'Self-adjustment and purification,' he said, 'with

careful regulation of his dress, and the not making a movement

contrary to the rules of propriety;-- this is the way for the ruler

to cultivate his person [2].' This is laying too much stress on what

is external; but even to attain to this is beyond unassisted human

strength. Confucius, however, never recognised a disturbance of

the moral elements in the constitution of man. The people would

move, according to him, to the virtue of their ruler as the grass

bends to the wind, and that virtue

1 Ana. XII. xvii; xviii; xix.

2 中庸, xx. 14.

would come to the ruler at his call. Many were the lamentations

which he uttered over the degeneracy of his times; frequent were

the confessions which he made of his own shortcomings. It seems

strange that it never came distinctly before him, that there is a

power of evil in the prince and the peasant, which no efforts of

their own and no instructions of sages are effectual to subdue.

The government which Confucius taught was a despotism,

but of a modified character. He allowed no 'jus divinum,'

independent of personal virtue and a benevolent rule. He has not

explicitly stated, indeed, wherein lies the ground of the great

relation of the governor and the governed, but his views on the

subject were, we may assume, in accordance with the language of

the Shu-ching:-- 'Heaven and Earth are the parents of all things,

and of all things men are the most intelligent. The man among

them most distinguished for intelligence becomes chief ruler, and

ought to prove himself the parent of the people [1].' And again,

'Heaven, protecting the inferior people, has constituted for them

rulers and teachers, who should be able to be assisting to God,

extending favour and producing tranquillity throughout all parts

of the kingdom [2].' The moment the ruler ceases to be a minister

of God for good, and does not administer a government that is

beneficial to the people, he forfeits the title by which he holds

the throne, and perseverance in oppression will surely lead to his

overthrow. Mencius inculcated this principle with a frequency and

boldness which are remarkable. It was one of the things about

which Confucius did not like to talk. Still he held it. It is

conspicuous in the last chapter of 'The Great Learning.' Its

tendency has been to check the violence of oppression, and

maintain the self-respect of the people, all along the course of

Chinese history.

I must bring these observations on Confucius's views of

government to a close, and I do so with two remarks. First, they

are adapted to a primitive, unsophisticated state of society. He is

a good counsellor for the father of a family, the chief of a clan,

and even the head of a small principality. But his views want the

comprehension which would make them of much service in a great

dominion. Within three centuries after his death,the government

of China passed into a new phase. The founder of the Ch'in dynasty

conceived the grand idea of abolishing all its feudal kingdoms,

and centralizing their administration in himself. He effected the

revo-

l 2 See the Shu-ching, V. i. Sect. I. 2, 7.

lution, and succeeding dynasties adopted his system, and

gradually molded it into the forms and proportions which are now

existing. There has been a tendency to advance, and Confucius has

all along been trying to carry the nation back. Principles have

been needed, and not 'proprieties.' The consequence is that China

has increased beyond its ancient dimensions, while there has been

no corresponding development of thought. Its body politic has the

size of a giant, while it still retains the mind of a child. Its hoary

age is in danger of becoming but senility.

Second, Confucius makes no provision for the intercourse of

his country with other and independent nations. He knew indeed of

none such. China was to him 'The Middle Kingdom [1],' 'The

multitude of Great States [2],' 'All under heaven [3].' Beyond it

were only rude and barbarous tribes. He does not speak of them

bitterly, as many Chinese have done since his time. In one place

he contrasts their condition favourably with the prevailing

anarchy of the kingdom, saying 'The rude tribes of the east and

north have their princes, and are not like the States of our great

land which are without them [4].' Another time, disgusted with

the want of appreciation which he experienced, he was expressing

his intention to go and live among the nine wild tribes of the east.

Some one said, 'They are rude. How can you do such a thing?' His

reply was, 'If a superior man dwelt among them, what rudeness

would there be [5]?' But had he been a ruler-sage, he would not

only have influenced them by his instructions, but brought them

to acknowledge and submit to his sway, as the great Yu did [6].

The only passage of Confucius's teachings from which any rule

can be gathered for dealing with foreigners is that in the

'Doctrine of the Mean,' where 'indulgent treatment of men from a

distance' is laid down as one of the nine standard rules for the

government of the country [7]. But 'the men from a distance' are

understood to be pin and lu [8] simply,-- 'guests,' that is, or

officers of one State seeking employment in another, or at the

royal court; and 'visitors,' or travelling merchants. Of independent

nations the ancient classics have not any knowledge, nor has

Confucius. So long as merchants from Europe and other parts of

the world could have been content to appear in China as

suppliants, seeking the privilege of trade, so

1 中國.

2 諸夏; Ana. III. v.

3 天下; passim.

4 Ana. III. v.

5 Ana. IX. xiii.

6 書經, III. ii. 10; et al.

7 柔遠人.

8 賓旅.

long the government would have ranked them with the barbarous

hordes of antiquity, and given them the benefit of the maxim

about 'indulgent treatment,' according to its own understanding of

it. But when their governments interfered, and claimed to treat

with that of China on terms of equality, and that their subjects

should be spoken to and of as being of the same clay with the

Chinese themselves, an outrage was committed on tradition and

prejudice, which it was necessary to resent with vehemence.

I do not charge the contemptuous arrogance of the Chinese

government and people upon Confucius; what I deplore, is that he

left no principles on record to check the development of such a

spirit. His simple views of society and government were in a

measure sufficient for the people while they dwelt apart from

the rest of mankind. His practical lessons were better than if

they had been left, which but for him they probably would have

been, to fall a prey to the influences of Taoism and Buddhism, but

they could only subsist while they were left alone. Of the earth

earthy, China was sure to go to pieces when it came into collision

with a Christianly-civilized power. Its sage had left it no

preservative or restorative elements against such a case.

It is a rude awakening from its complacency of centuries

which China has now received. Its ancient landmarks are swept

away. Opinions will differ as to the justice or injustice of the

grounds on which it has been assailed, and I do not feel called to

judge or to pronounce here concerning them. In the progress of

events, it could hardly be but that the collision should come; and

when it did come it could not be but that China should be broken

and scattered. Disorganization will go on to destroy it more and

more, and yet there is hope for the people, with their veneration

for the relations of society, with their devotion to learning, and

with their habits of industry and sobriety; there is hope for them,

if they will look away from all their ancient sages, and turn to

Him, who sends them, along with the dissolution of their ancient

state, the knowledge of Himself, the only living and true God, and

of Jesus Christ whom He hath sent.

8. I have little more to add on the opinions of Confucius.

Many of his sayings are pithy, and display much knowledge of

character; but as they are contained in the body of the Work, I

will not occupy the space here with a selection of those which

have struck myself as most worthy of notice. The fourth Book of

the Analects,

which is on the subject of zan, or perfect virtue, has several

utterances which are remarkable.

Thornton observes:-- 'It may excite surprise, and probably

incredulity, to state that the golden rule of our Saviour, 'Do unto

others as you would that they should do unto you,' which Mr. Locke

designates as 'the most unshaken rule of morality, and foundation

of all social virtue,' had been inculcated by Confucius, almost in

the same words, four centuries before [1].' I have taken notice of

this fact in reviewing both 'The Great Learning' and 'The Doctrine

of the Mean.' I would be far from grudging a tribute of admiration

to Confucius for it. The maxim occurs also twice in the Analects.

In Book XV. xxiii, Tsze-kung asks if there be one word which may

serve as a rule of practice for all one's life, and is answered, 'Is

not reciprocity such a word? What you do not want done to

yourself do not do to others.' The same disciple appears in Book V.

xi, telling Confucius that he was practising the lesson. He says,

'What I do not wish men to do to me, I also wish not to do to men;'

but the master tells him, 'Tsze, you have not attained to that.' It

would appear from this reply, that he was aware of the difficulty

of obeying the precept ; and it is not found, in its condensed

expression at least, in the older classics. The merit of it is

Confucius's own.

When a comparison, however, is drawn between it and the

rule laid down by Christ, it is proper to call attention to the

positive form of the latter, 'All things whatsoever ye would that

men should do unto you, do ye even so to them.' The lesson of the

gospel commands men to do what they feel to be right and good. It

requires them to commence a course of such conduct, without

regard to the conduct of others to themselves. The lesson of

Confucius only forbids men to do what they feel to be wrong and

hurtful. So far as the point of priority is concerned, moreover,

Christ adds, 'This is the law and the prophets.' The maxim was to

be found substantially in the earlier revelations of God. Still it

must be allowed that Confucius was well aware of the

importance of taking the initiative in discharging all the

relations of society. See his words as quoted from 'The Doctrine

of the Mean' on pages 48, 49 above. But the worth of the two

maxims depends on the intention of the enunciators in regard to

their application. Confucius, it seems to me, did not think of the

reciprocity coming into action beyond the circle of his five

relations of society. Possibly, he might have

1 History of China, vol. i. p. 209.

required its observance in dealings even with the rude tribes,

which were the only specimens of mankind besides his own

countrymen of which he knew anything, for on one occasion, when

asked about perfect virtue, he replied, 'It is, in retirement, to be

sedately grave; in the management of business, to be reverently

attentive; in intercourse with others, to be strictly sincere.

Though a man go among the rude uncultivated tribes, these

qualities may not be neglected [1].' Still Confucius delivered his

rule to his countrymen only, and only for their guidance in their

relations of which I have had so much occasion to speak. The rule

of Christ is for man as man, having to do with other men, all with

himself on the same platform, as the children and subjects of the

one God and Father in heaven.

How far short Confucius came of the standard of Christian

benevolence, may be seen from his remarks when asked what was

to be thought of the principle that injury should be recompensed

with kindness. He replied, 'With what then will you recompense

kindness? Recompense injury with justice, and recompense

kindness with kindness [2].' The same deliverance is given in one

of the Books of the Li Chi, where he adds that 'he who

recompenses injury with kindness is a man who is careful of his

person [3].' Chang Hsuan, the commentator of the second century,

says that such a course would be 'incorrect in point of propriety

[4].' This 'propriety' was a great stumbling-block in the way of

Confucius. His morality was the result of the balancings of his

intellect, fettered by the decisions of men of old, and not the

gushings of a loving heart, responsive to the promptings of

Heaven, and in sympathy with erring and feeble humanity.

This subject leads me on to the last of the opinions of

Confucius which I shall make the subject of remark in this place.

A commentator observes, with reference to the inquiry about

recompensing injury with kindness, that the questioner was

asking only about trivial matters, which might be dealt with in

the way he mentioned, while great offences, such as those

against a sovereign or a father, could not be dealt with by such an

inversion of the principles of justice [5]. In the second Book of

the Li Chi there is the following passage:-- 'With the slayer of

his father, a man may not live under the same heaven; against the

slayer of his brother, a man must never have to go home to fetch a

weapon; with the slayer of

1 Ana. XIII. xix.

2 Ana. XIV. xxxvi.

3 禮記, 表記, par. 12.

4 非禮之正.

5 See notes in loc., p. 288.

his friend, a man may not live in the same State [1].' The lex

talionis is here laid down in its fullest extent. The Chau Li tells

us of a provision made against the evil consequences of the

principle, by the appointment of a minister called 'The Reconciler

[2].' The provision is very inferior to the cities of refuge which

were set apart by Moses for the manslayer to flee to from the

fury of the avenger. Such as it was, however, it existed, and it is

remarkable that Confucius, when consulted on the subject, took

no notice of it, but affirmed the duty of blood-revenge in the

strongest and most unrestricted terms. His disciple Tsze-hsia

asked him, 'What course is to be pursued in the case of the murder

of a father or mother?' He replied, 'The son must sleep upon a

matting of grass, with his shield for his pillow; he must decline

to take office; he must not live under the same heaven with the

slayer. When he meets him in the marketplace or the court, he

must have his weapon ready to strike him.' 'And what is the

course on the murder of a brother?' 'The surviving brother must

not take office in the same State with the slayer; yet if he go on

his prince's service to the State where the slayer is, though he

meet him, he must not fight with him.' 'And what is the course on

the murder of an uncle or a cousin?' 'In this case the nephew or

cousin is not the principal. If the principal on whom the revenge

devolves can take it, he has only to stand behind with his weapon

in his hand, and support him [3].'

Sir John Davis has rightly called attention to this as one of

the objectionable principles of Confucius [4]. The bad effects of it

are evident even in the present day. Revenge is sweet to the

Chinese. I have spoken of their readiness to submit to

government, and wish to live in peace, yet they do not like to

resign even to government the 'inquisition for blood.' Where the

ruling authority is feeble, as it is at present, individuals and

clans take the law into their own hands, and whole districts are

kept in a state of constant feud and warfare.

But I must now leave the sage. I hope I have not done him

injustice; the more I have studied his character and opinions, the

more highly have I come to regard him. He was a very great man,

and his influence has been on the whole a great benefit to the

Chinese, while his teachings suggest important lessons to

ourselves who profess to belong to the school of Christ.

1 禮記, I. Sect. I. Pt. v. 10.

2 周禮, 卷之十四, pp. 14-18.

3 禮記, II. Sect. I. Pt. ii. 24. See also the 家語, 卷四, 子貢問.

4 The Chinese, vol. ii. p. 41.

SECTION III.

HIS IMMEDIATE DISCIPLES.

Sze-ma Ch'ien makes Confucius say: 'The disciples who

received my instructions, and could themselves comprehend them,

were seventy-seven individuals. They were all scholars of

extraordinary ability [1].' The common saying is, that the

disciples of the sage were three thousand, while among them

there were seventy-two worthies. I propose to give here a list of

all those whose names have come down to us, as being his

followers. Of the greater number it will be seen that we know

nothing more than their names and surnames. My principal

authorities will be the 'Historical Records,' the 'Narratives of the

School,' 'The Sacrificial Canon for the Sage's Temple, with

Plates,' and the chapter on 'The Disciples of Confucius' prefixed to

the 'Four Books, Text and Commentary, with Proofs and

Illustrations.' In giving a few notices of the better-known

individuals, I will endeavour to avoid what may be gathered from

the Analects.

1. Yen Hui, by designation Tsze-yuan (顏回, 字子淵). He was a

native of Lu, the favourite of his master, whose junior he was by

thirty years, and whose disciple he became when he was quite a

youth. 'After I got Hui,' Confucius remarked, 'the disciples came

closer to me.' We are told that once, when he found himself on the

Nang hill with Hui, Tsze-lu, and Tsze-kung, Confucius asked them

to tell him their different aims, and he would choose between

them. Tsze-lu began, and when he had done, the master said, 'It

marks your bravery.' Tsze-kung followed, on whose words the

judgment was, 'They show your discriminating eloquence.' At last

came Yen Yuan, who said, 'I should like to find an intelligent king

and sage ruler whom I might assist. I would diffuse among the

people instructions on the five great points, and lead them on by

the rules of propriety and music, so that they should not care to

fortify their cities by walls and moats, but would fuse their

swords and spears into implements of agriculture. They should

send forth their flocks without fear into the plains and forests.

There should be no sunderings of families, no widows or

widowers. For a thousand

1 孔子曰,受業身通者,七十有七人,皆異能之士也.

years there would be no calamity of war. Yu would have no

opportunity to display his bravery, or Ts'ze to display his oratory.'

The master pronounced, 'How admirable is this virtue!'

When Hui was twenty-nine, his hair was all white, and in

three years more he died. He was sacrificed to, along with

Confucius, by the first emperor of the Han dynasty. The title

which he now has in the sacrificial Canon,-- 'Continuator of the

Sage,' was conferred in the ninth year of the emperor, or, to speak

more correctly, of the period, Chia-ching, A. D. 1530. Almost all

the present sacrificial titles of the worthies in the temple were

fixed at that time. Hui's place is the first of the four Assessors,

on the east of the sage [1].

2. Min Sun, styled Tsze-ch'ien (閔損,字子騫). He was a native

of Lu, fifteen years younger than Confucius, according to Sze-ma

Ch'ien, but fifty years younger, according to the 'Narratives of the

School,' which latter authority is followed in 'The Annals of the

Empire.' When he first came to Confucius, we are told, he had a

starved look [2], which was by-and-by exchanged for one of

fulness and satisfaction [3]. Tsze-kung asked him how the change

had come about. He replied, 'I came from the midst of my reeds

and sedges into the school of the master. He trained my mind to

filial piety, and set before me the examples of the ancient kings. I

felt a pleasure in his instructions; but when I went abroad, and

saw the people in authority, with their umbrellas and banners,

and all the pomp and circumstance of their trains, I also felt

pleasure in that show. These two things assaulted each other in

1 I have referred briefly, at p. 91, to the temples of Confucius.

The principal hall, called 大成殿, or 'Hall of the Great and

Complete One,' is that in which is his own statue or the tablet of

his spirit, having on each side of it, within a screen, the statues,

or tablets, of his 'four Assessors.' On the east and west, along the

walls of the same apartment, are the two 序, the places of the 十

二哲, or 'twelve Wise Ones,' those of his disciples, who, next to

the 'Assessors,' are counted worthy of honour. Outside this

apartment, and running in a line with the two 序, but along the

external wall of the sacred inclosure, are the two 廡, or side-

galleries, which I have sometimes called the ranges of the outer

court. In each there are sixty-four tablets of the disciples and

other worthies, having the same title as the Wise Ones, that of 先

賢, or 'Ancient Worthy,' or the inferior title of 先儒, 'Ancient

Scholar.' Behind the principal hall is the 崇聖祠殿, sacred to

Confucius's ancestors, whose tablets are in the centre, fronting

the south, like that of Confucius. On each side are likewise the

tablets of certain 'ancient Worthies,' and 'ancient Scholars.'

2 菜色.

3 芻豢之色.

my breast. I could not determine which to prefer, and so I wore

that look of distress. But now the lessons of our master have

penetrated deeply into my mind. My progress also has been helped

by the example of you my fellow-disciples. I now know what I

should follow and what I should avoid, and all the pomp of power

is no more to me than the dust of the ground. It is on this account

that I have that look of fulness and satisfaction.' Tsze-ch'ien was

high in Confucius's esteem. He was distinguished for his purity

and filial affection. His place in the temple is the first, east,

among 'The Wise Ones,' immediately after the four assessors. He

was first sacrificed to along with Confucius, as is to be

understood of the other 'Wise Ones,' excepting in the case of Yu

Zo, in the eighth year of the style K'ai-yuan of the sixth emperor

of the T'ang dynasty, A.D. 720. His title, the same as that of all

but the Assessors, is-- 'The ancient Worthy, the philosopher Min.'

3 . Zan Kang, styled Po-niu (冉耕, 字白 [al. 百] 牛). He was a

native of Lu, and Confucius's junior only by seven years. When

Confucius became minister of Crime, he appointed Po-niu to the

office, which he had himself formerly held, of commandant of

Chung-tu. His tablet is now fourth among 'The Wise Ones,' on the

west.

4. Zan Yung, styled Chung-kung (冉雍, 字仲弓). He was of the

same clan as Zan Kang, and twenty-nine years younger than

Confucius. He had a bad father, but the master declared that was

not to be counted to him, to detract from his admitted excellence.

His place is among 'The Wise Ones,' the second, east.

5. Zan Ch'iu, styled Tsze-yu (冉求, 字子有). He was related to

the two former, and of the same age as Chung-kung. He was noted

among the disciples for his versatile ability and many

acquirements. Tsze-kung said of him, 'Respectful to the old, and

kind to the young; attentive to guests and visitors; fond of

learning and skilled in many arts; diligent in his examination of

things:-- these are what belong to Zan Ch'iu." It has been noted in

the life of Confucius that it was by the influence of Tsze-yu that

he was finally restored to Lu. He occupies the third place, west,

among 'The Wise Ones.'

6. Chung Yu, styled Tsze-lu and Chi-lu (仲由, 字子路, 又字季路).

He was a native of P'ien (卞) in Lu and only

nine years younger than Confucius. At their first interview, the

master asked him what he was fond of, and he replied, 'My long

sword.' Confucius said, 'If to your present ability there were

added the results of learning, you would be a very superior man.'

'Of what advantage would learning be to me?' asked Tsze-lu.

'There is a bamboo on the southern hill, which is straight itself

without being bent. If you cut it down and use it, you can send it

through a rhinoceros's hide;-- what is the use of learning?' 'Yes,'

said the master; 'but if you feather it and point it with steel, will

it not penetrate more deeply?' Tsze-lu bowed ' twice, and said, 'I

will reverently receive your instructions.' Confucius was wont to

say, 'From the time that I got Yu, bad words no more came to my

ears.' For some time Tsze-lu was chief magistrate of the district

of P'u (蒲), where his administration commanded the warm

commendations of the master. He died finally in Wei, as has been

related above, pp. 86, 87. His tablet is now the fourth, east, from

those of the Assessors.

7. Tsai Yu styled Tsze-wo (宰予, 字子我). He was a native of

Lu, but nothing is mentioned of his age. He had 'a sharp mouth,'

according to Sze-ma Ch'ien. Once, when he was at the court of

Ch'u on some commission, the king Chao offered him an easy

carriage adorned with ivory for his master. Yu replied, 'My master

is a man who would rejoice in a government where right

principles were carried out, and can find his joy in himself when

that is not the case. Now right principles and virtue are as it

were in a state of slumber. His wish is to rouse and put them in

motion. Could he find a prince really anxious to rule according to

them, he would walk on foot to his court and be glad to do so. Why

need he receive such a valuable gift, as this from so great a

distance?' Confucius commended this reply; but where he is

mentioned in the Analects, Tsze-wo does not appear to great

advantage. He took service in the State of Ch'i, and was chief

magistrate of Lin-tsze, where he joined with T'ien Ch'ang in some

disorderly movement [1], which led to the destruction of his

kindred, and made Confucius ashamed of him. His tablet is now

the second, west, among 'The Wise Ones.'

8. Twan-mu Ts'ze, styled Tsze-kung (端木賜, 字子貢 [al. 子贛]),

whose place is now third, east, from the Assessors. He

1 與田常作亂. See Sze-ma Ch'ien's Biographies, chap. 7, though

come have doubted the genuineness of this part of the notice of

Tsze-wo.

was a native of Wei (衛), and thirty-one years younger than

Confucius. He had great quickness of natural ability, and appears

in the Analects as one of the most forward talkers among the

disciples. Confucius used to say, 'From the time that I got Ts'ze,

scholars from a distance came daily resorting to me.' Several

instances of the language which he used to express his admiration

of the master have been given in the last section. Here is

another:-- The duke Ching of Ch'i asked Tsze-kung how Chung-ni

was to be ranked as a sage. 'I do not know,' was the reply. 'I have

all my life had the heaven over my head, but I do not know its

height, and the earth under my feet, but I do not know its

thickness. In my serving of Confucius, I am like a thirsty man who

goes with his pitcher to the river, and there he drinks his fill,

without knowing the river's depth.' He took leave of Confucius to

become commandant of Hsin-yang (信陽宰), when the master said

to him, 'In dealing with your subordinates, there is nothing like

impartiality; and when wealth comes in your way, there is

nothing like moderation. Hold fast these two things, and do not

swerve from them. To conceal men's excellence is to obscure the

worthy; and to proclaim people's wickedness is the part of a mean

man. To speak evil of those whom you have not sought the

opportunity to instruct is not the way of friendship and harmony.'

Subsequently Tsze-kung was high in office both in Lu and Wei, and

finally died in Ch'i. We saw how he was in attendance on

Confucius at the time of the sage's death. Many of the disciples

built huts near the master's grave, and mourned for him three

years, but Tsze-kung remained sorrowing alone for three years

more.

9. Yen Yen, styled Tsze-yu (言偃, 字子游), now the fourth in

the western range of 'The Wise Ones.' He was a native of Wu (吳),

forty-five years younger than Confucius, and distinguished for his

literary acquirements. Being made commandant of Wu-ch'ang, he

transformed the character of the people by 'proprieties' and

music, and was praised by the master. After the death of

Confucius, Chi K'ang asked Yen how that event had made no

sensation like that which was made by the death of Tsze-ch'an,

when the men laid aside their bowstring rings and girdle

ornaments, and the women laid aside their pearls and ear-rings,

and the voice of weeping was heard in the lanes for three months.

Yen replied, 'The influences of Tsze-ch'an and my master might be

compared

to those of overflowing water and the fattening rain. Wherever

the water in its overflow reaches, men take knowledge of it,

while the fattening rain falls unobserved.'

10. Pu Shang, styled Tsze-hsia (卜商, 字子夏). It is not

certain to what State he belonged, his birth being assigned to Wei

(衛), to Wei (魏), and to Wan (溫). He was forty-five years younger

than Confucius, and lived to a great age, for we find him, B.C. 406,

at the court of the prince Wan of Wei (魏), to whom he gave copies

of some of the classical Books. He is represented as a scholar

extensively read and exact, but without great comprehension of

mind. What is called Mao's Shih-ching (毛詩) is said to contain the

views of Tsze-hsia. Kung-yang Kao and Ku-liang Ch'ih are also

said to have studied the Ch'un Ch'iu with him. On the occasion of

the death of his son he wept himself blind. His place is the fifth,

east, among 'The Wise Ones.'

11. Chwan-sun Shih, styled Tsze-chang (顓孫師, 字子張), has

his tablet, corresponding to that of the preceding, on the west. He

was a native of Ch'an (陳), and forty-eight years younger than

Confucius. Tsze-kung said, 'Not to boast of his admirable merit;

not to signify joy on account of noble station; neither insolent nor

indolent; showing no pride to the dependent:-- these are the

characteristics of Chwan-sun Shih.' When he was sick, he called

(his son) Shan-hsiang to him, and said, 'We speak of his end in the

case of a superior man, and of his death in the case of a mean

man. May I think that it is going to be the former with me to-

day?'

12. Tsang Shan [or Ts'an] styled Tsze-yu (曾參, 字子輿 [al. 子

與]). He was a native of south Wu-ch'ang, and forty-six years

younger than Confucius. In his sixteenth year he was sent by his

father into Ch'u, where Confucius then was, to learn under the

sage. Excepting perhaps Yen Hui, there is not a name of greater

note in the Confucian school. Tsze-kung said of him, 'There is no

subject which he has not studied. His appearance is respectful.

His virtue is solid. His words command credence. Before great

men he draws himself up in the pride of self-respect. His

eyebrows are those of longevity.' He was noted for his filial

piety, and after the death of his parents, he could not read the

rites of mourning without being led to think of them, and moved

to tears. He was a voluminous writer. Ten Books of his

composition are said to be contained in the 'Rites of the elder Tai'

(大戴禮). The Classic of Filial Piety he is said to have made under

the eye of Confucius. On his connexion with 'The Great Learning,'

see above, Ch. III. Sect. II. He was first associated with the

sacrifices to Confucius in A.D. 668, but in 1267 he was advanced

to be one of the sage's four Assessors. His title-- 'Exhibitor of

the Fundamental Principles of the Sage,' dates from the period of

Chia-ching, as mentioned in speaking of Yen Hui.

13. Tan-t'ai Mieh-ming, styled Tsze-yu (澹臺滅明, 字子羽). He

was a native of Wu-ch'ang, thirty-nine years younger than

Confucius, according to the 'Historical Records,' but forty-nine,

according to the 'Narratives of the School.' He was excessively

ugly, and Confucius thought meanly of his talents in consequence,

on his first application to him. After completing his studies, he

travelled to the south as far as the Yang-tsze. Traces of his

presence in that part of the country are still pointed out in the

department of Su-chau. He was followed by about three hundred

disciples, to whom he laid down rules for their guidance in their

intercourse with the princes. When Confucius heard of his

success, he confessed how he had been led by his bad looks to

misjudge him. He, with nearly all the disciples whose names

follow, first had a place assigned to him in the sacrifices to

Confucius in A.D. 739. The place of his tablet is the second, east,

in the outer court, beyond that of the 'Assessors' and 'Wise Ones.'

14. Corresponding to the preceding, on the west, is the

tablet of Fu Pu-ch'i styled Tsze-tsien (宓 [al. 密 and 虙, all = 伏] 不

齊, 字子賤). He was a native of Lu, and, according to different

accounts, thirty, forty, and forty-nine years younger than

Confucius. He was commandant of Tan-fu (單父宰), and hardly

needed to put forth any personal effort. Wu-ma Ch'i had been in

the same office, and had succeeded by dint of the greatest

industry and toil. He asked Pu-ch'i how he managed so easily for

himself, and was answered, 'I employ men; you employ men's

strength.' People pronounced Fu to be a superior man. He was also

a writer, and his works are mentioned in Liu Hsin's Catalogue.

15. Next to that of Mieh-ming is the tablet of Yuan Hsien,

styled Tsze-sze (原憲, 字子思) a native of Sung or according to

Chang Hsuan, of Lu, and younger than Confucius by thirty-six

years. He was noted for his purity and modesty, and for his

happiness in the principles of the master amid deep poverty.

After the death of Confucius, he lived in obscurity in Wei. In the

notes to Ana. VI. iii, I have referred to an interview which he had

with Tsze-kung.

16. Kung-ye Ch'ang [al. Chih], styled Tsze-ch'ang [al. Tsze-

chih], (公冶長 [al. 芝], 字子長 [al. 子芝]), has his tablet next to that

of Pu-ch'i. He was son-in-law to Confucius. His nativity is

assigned both to Lu and to Ch'i.

17. Nan-kung Kwo, styled Tsze-yung (南宮括 [al. 适 and, in the

'Narratives of the School,' 縚 (T'ao)], 字子容), has the place at the

east next to Yuan Hsien. It is a question much debated whether he

was the same with Nan-kung Chang-shu, who accompanied

Confucius to the court of Chau, or not. On occasion of a fire

breaking out in the palace of duke Ai, while others were intent on

securing the contents of the Treasury, Nan-kung directed his

efforts to save the Library, and to him was owing the

preservation of the copy of the Chau Li which was in Lu, and other

ancient monuments.

18. Kung-hsi Ai, styled Chi-ts'ze [al. Chi-ch'an] (公皙哀, 字季

次 [al. 季沉]). His tablet follows that of Kung-ye. He was a native

of Lu, or of Ch'i. Confucius commended him for refusing to take

office with any of the Families which were encroaching on the

authority of the princes of the States, and for choosing to endure

the severest poverty rather than sacrifice a tittle of his

principles.

19. Tsang Tien, styled Hsi (曾蒧[al. 點], 字皙). .He was the

father of Tsang Shan. His place in the temples is the hall to

Confucius's ancestors, where his tablet is the first, west.

20. Yen Wu-yao, styled Lu (顏無繇, 字路). He was the father of

Yen Hui, younger than Confucius by six years. His sacrificial place

is the first, east, in the same hall as the last.

21. Following the tablet of Nan-kung Kwo is that of Shang

Chu, styled Tsze-mu (商瞿, 字子木). To him, it is said, we are

indebted for the preservation of the Yi-ching, which he received

from Confucius. Its transmission step by step, from Chu down to

the Han dynasty, is minutely set forth.

22. Next to Kung-hsi Ai is the place of Kao Ch'ai, styled

Tsze-kao and Chi-kao (高柴, 字子羔 [al. 季羔; for 羔 moreover, we

find 皋, and 睾]), a native of Ch'i, according to the 'Narratives

of the School,' but of Wei, according to Sze-ma Ch'ien and Chang

Hsuan. He was thirty (some say forty) years younger than

Confucius, dwarfish and ugly, but of great worth and ability. At

one time he was criminal judge of Wei, and in the execution of his

office condemned a prisoner to lose his feet. Afterwards that

same man saved his life, when he was flying from the State.

Confucius praised Ch'ai for being able to administer stern justice

with such a spirit of benevolence as to disarm resentment.

23. Shang Chu is followed by Ch'i-tiao K'ai [prop. Ch'i],

styled Tsze-k'ai, Tsze-zo, and Tsze-hsiu (漆雕開 [pr. 啟], 字子開, 子

若, and 子修脩), a native of Ts'ai (蔡), or according to Chang Hsuan,

of Lu. We only know him as a reader of the Shu-ching, and refusing

to go into office.

24. Kung-po Liao, styled Tsze-chau (公伯僚, 字子周). He

appears in the Analects, XIV. xxxiii, slandering Tsze-lu. It is

doubtful whether he should have a place among the disciples.

25. Sze-ma Kang, styled Tsze-niu (司馬耕, 字子牛), follows

Ch'i-tiao K'ai; also styled 黍耕. He was a great talker, a native of

Sung, and a brother of Hwan T'ui, to escape from whom seems to

have been the labour of his life.

26. The place next Kao Ch'ai is occupied by Fan Hsu, styled

Tsze-ch'ih (樊須, 字子遲), a native of Ch'i, or, according to others,

of Lu, and whose age is given as thirty-six and forty-six years

younger than Confucius. When young, he distinguished himself in a

military command under the Chi family.

27. Yu Zo, styled Tsze-zo (有若, 字子若). He was a native of

Lu, and his age is stated very variously. He was noted among the

disciples for his great memory and fondness for antiquity. After

the death of Confucius, the rest of the disciples, because of some

likeness in Zo's speech to the Master, wished to render the same

observances to him which they had done to Confucius, but on

Tsang Shan's demurring to the thing, they abandoned the purpose.

The tablet of Tsze-zo is now the sixth, east among 'The Wise

Ones,' to which place it was promoted in the third year of Ch'ien-

lung of the present dynasty. This was done in compliance with a

memorial from the president of one of the Boards, who said he

was moved by a dream to make the request. We may suppose that

his real motives were a wish to do Justice to the merits of Tsze-

zo, and to restore the symmetry of the tablets in the 'Hall of the

Great and Complete One,' which had been disturbed by the

introduction of the tablet of Chu Hsi in the preceding reign.

28. Kung-hsi Ch'ih, styled Tsze-hwa (公西赤, 字子華), a native

of Lu, younger than Confucius by forty-two years, whose place is

the fourth, west, in the outer court. He was noted for his

knowledge of ceremonies, and the other disciples devolved on him

all the arrangements about the funeral of the Master.

29. Wu-ma Shih [or Ch'i], styled Tsze-Ch'i (巫馬施 [al. 期], 字

子期 [al. 子旗]), a native of Ch'an, or, according to Chang Hsuan, of

Lu, thirty years younger than Confucius. His tablet is on the east,

next to that of Sze-ma Kang. It is related that on one occasion,

when Confucius was about to set out with a company of the

disciples on a walk or journey, he told them to take umbrellas.

They met with a heavy shower, and Wu-ma asked him, saying,

'There were no clouds in the morning; but after the sun had risen,

you told us to take umbrellas. How did you know that it would

rain?' Confucius said, 'The moon last evening was in the

constellation Pi, and is it not said in the Shih-ching, "When the

moon is in Pi, there will be heavy rain?" It was thus I knew it.'

30. Liang Chan [al. Li], styled Shu-yu (梁鱣 [al. 鯉] 字叔魚),

occupies the eighth place, west, among the tablets of the outer

court. He was a man of Ch'i, and his age is stated as twenty-nine

and thirty-nine years younger than Confucius. The following story

is told in connexion with him.-- When he was thirty, being

disappointed that he had no son, he was minded to put away his

wife. 'Do not do so,' said Shang Chu to him. 'I was thirty-eight

before I had a son, and my mother was then about to take another

wife for me, when the Master proposed sending me to Ch'i. My

mother was unwilling that I should go, but Confucius said, 'Don't

be anxious. Chu will have five sons after he is forty.' It has turned

out so, and I apprehend it is your fault, and not your wife's, that

you have no son yet.' Chan took this advice, and in the second year

after, he had a son.

31. Yen Hsing [al. Hsin, Liu, and Wei], styled Tsze-liu (顏幸

[al. 辛, 柳, and 韋], 字子柳), occupies the place, east, after Wu-ma

Shih. He was a native of Lu, and forty-six years younger than

Confucius.

32. Liang Chan is followed on the west by Zan Zu, styled

Tsze-lu [al. Tsze-tsang and Tsze-yu] (冉孺 [al. 儒] 字*子魯 [al. 子曾

* Digitizer's note: This is 宇 in the source text; I have corrected

what is an obvious misprint.

and 子魚]), a native of Lu, and fifty years younger than Confucius.

33. Yen Hsing is followed on the east by Ts'ao Hsu, styled

Tsze-hsun (曹卹, 字子循), a native of Ts'ai, fifty years younger than

Confucius.

34. Next on the west is Po Ch'ien, styled Tsze-hsi, or, in the

current copies of the 'Narratives of the School,' Tsze-ch'iai (伯虔,

字子皙 [al. 子析] or 子楷), a native of Lu, fifty years younger than

Confucius.

35. Following Tsze-hsun is Kung-sun Lung [al. Ch'ung] styled

Tsze-shih (公孫龍 [al. 寵], 字子石), whose birth is assigned by

different writers to Wei, Ch'u, and Chao (趙). He was fifty-three

years younger than Confucius. We have the following account:--

'Tsze-kung asked Tsze-shih, saying, "Have you not learned the

Book of' Poetry?" Tsze-shih replied, "What leisure have I to do

so? My parents require me to be filial; my brothers require me to

be submissive; and my friends require me to be sincere. What

leisure have I for anything else?" "Come to my Master," said Tsze-

kung, "and learn of him."'

Sze-ma Ch'ien here observes: 'Of the thirty-five disciples

which precede, we have some details. Their age and other

particulars are found in the Books and Records. It is not so,

however, in regard to the fifty-two which follow.'

36. Zan Chi, styled Tsze-ch'an [al. Chi-ch'an and Tsze-ta] (冉

季, 字子產 [al. 季產 and 子達), a native of Lu, whose place is the

11th, west, next to Po Ch'ien.

37. Kung-tsu Kau-tsze or simply Tsze, styled Tsze-chih (公

祖勾茲 [or simply 茲], 字子之), a native of Lu. His tablet is the 23rd,

east, in the outer court.

38. Ch'in Tsu, styled Tsze-nan (秦祖, 字子南), a native of

Ch'in. His tablet precedes that of the last, two places.

39. Ch'i-tiao Ch'ih, styled Tsze-lien (漆雕哆 [al. 侈], 字子斂), a

native of Lu. His tablet is the 13th, west.

40. Yen Kao, styled Tsze-chiao (顏高字子驕). According to the

'Narratives of the School,' he was the same as Yen K'o (刻, or 剋),

who drove the carriage when Confucius rode in Wei after the duke

and Nan-tsze. But this seems doubtful. Other

authorities make his name Ch'an (產), and style him Tsze-tsing (子

精). His tablet is the 13th, east.

41. Ch'i-tiao Tu-fu [al. . Ts'ung], styled Tsze-yu, Tsze-ch'i,

and Tsze-wan (漆雕徒父 [al. 從], 字子有 or 子友 [al. 子期 and 子文]), a

native of Lu, whose tablet precedes that of Ch'i-tiao Ch'ih.

42. Zang Sze-ch'ih, styled Tsze-t'u, or Tsze-ts'ung (壤 [al. 穰]

駟赤, 字子徒 [al. 子從]), a native of Ch'in. Some consider Zang-sze

(壤駟) to be a double surname. His tablet comes after that of No.

40.

43. Shang Chai, styled Tsze-Ch'i and Tsze-hsiu (商澤, 字子季

[al. 子秀]), a native of Lu. His tablet is immediately after that of

Fan Hsu, No. 26.

44. Shih Tso [al. Chih and Tsze]-shu, styled Tsze-ming (石作

[al. 之 and 子], 蜀, 字子明). Some take Shih-tso (石作) as a double

surname. His tablet follows that of No. 42.

45. Zan Pu-ch'i, styled Hsuan (任不齊, 字選), a native of Ch'u,

whose tablet is next to that of No. 28.

46. Kung-liang Zu, styled Tsze-chang (公良孺 [al. 儒], 字子正),

a native of Ch'in, follows the preceding in the temples. The

'Sacrificial Canon' says:-- 'Tsze-chang was a man of worth and

bravery. When Confucius was surrounded and stopped in P'u, Tsze-

chang fought so desperately, that the people of P'u were afraid,

and let the Master go, on his swearing that he would not proceed

to Wei.'

47. Hau [al. Shih] Ch'u [al. Ch'ien], styled Tsze-li [al. Li-ch'ih]

(后 [al. 石] 處 [al. 虔], 字子里 [al. 里之]), a native of Ch'i, having his

tablet the 17th, east.

48. Ch'in Zan, styled K'ai (秦冉, 字開), a native of Ts'ai. He is

not given in the list of the 'Narratives of the School,' and on this

account his tablet was put out of the temples in the ninth year of

Chia-tsing. It was restored, however, in the second year of Yung-

chang, A.D. 1724, and is the 33rd, east, in the outer court.

49. Kung-hsia Shau, styled Shang [and Tsze-shang] (公夏首

[al. 守], 字乘 [and 子乘]), a native of Lu, whose tablet is next to that

of No. 44.

50. Hsi Yung-tien [or simply Tien], styled Tsze-hsi [al. Tsze-

chieh and Tsze-ch'ieh] (系容蒧 [or 點], 字子皙 [al. 子偕 and 子楷]), a

native of Wei, having his tablet the 18th, east.

51. Kung Chien-ting [al. Kung Yu], styled Tsze-chung (公肩 [al.

堅] 定 [al. 公有], 字子仲 [al. 中 and 忠]). His nativity is assigned to Lu,

to Wei, and to Tsin (晉). He follows No. 46.

52. Yen Tsu [al. Hsiang], styled Hsiang and Tsze-hsiang (顏祖

[al. 相], 字襄, and 子襄), a native of Lu, with his tablet following

that of No. 50.

53. Chiao Tan [al. Wu], styled Tsze-kea (鄡單 [al. 鄔*], 字子

家), a native of Lu. His place is next to that of No. 51.

54. Chu [al. Kau] Tsing-ch'iang [and simply Tsing], styled

Tsze-ch'iang [al. Tsze-chieh and Tsze-mang] (句 [al. 勾 and 鉤] 井疆

[and simply 井], 字子疆 [al. 子界 and 子孟]), a native of Wei,

following No. 52.

55. Han [al. Tsai]-fu Hei, styled Tsze-hei [al. Tsze-so and

Tsze-su] (罕 [al. 宰] 父黑, 字子黑 [al. 子索 and 子素]), a native of Lu,

whose tablet is next to that of No. 53.

56. Ch'in Shang, styled Tsze-p'ei [al. P'ei-tsze and Pu-tsze]

(秦商, 字子丕 [al. 丕茲 and 不茲]), a native of Lu, or, according to

Chang Hsuan, of Ch'u. He was forty years younger than Confucius.

One authority, however, says he was only four years younger, and

that his father and Confucius's father were both celebrated for

their strength. His tablet is the 12th, east.

57. Shin Tang, styled Chau (申黨字周). In the 'Narratives of

the School' there is a Shin Chi, styled Tsze-chau (申續, 字子周). The

name is given by others as T'ang (堂 and 儻) and Tsu (續), with the

designation Tsze-tsu (子續). These are probably the same person

mentioned in the Analects as Shin Ch'ang (申棖). Prior to the Ming

dynasty they were sacrificed to as two, but in A.D. 1530, the

name Tang was expunged from the sacrificial list, and only that

of Ch'ang left. His tablet is the 31st, east.

58. Yen Chih-p'o, styled Tsze-shu [or simply Shu] (顏之僕, 字

子叔 [or simply 叔]), a native of Lu, who occupies the 29th place,

east.

59. Yung Ch'i, styled Tsze-ch'i [al. Tsze-yen] (榮旂 [or 祈], 字

子旗 or 子祺 [al. 子顏]), a native of Lu, whose tablet is the 20th,

west.

*Digitizer's note: The actual variant used by Legge is (鄔左即右).

60. Hsien Ch'ang, styled Tsze-ch'i [al. Tsze-hung] (縣成, 字子

棋 [al. 子橫]), a native of Lu. His place is the 22nd, east.

61. Tso Zan-ying [or simply Ying], styled Hsing and Tsze-

hsing (左人郢 [or simply 郢], 字行 and 子行), a native of Lu. His

tablet follows that of No. 59.

62. Yen Chi, styled An [al. Tsze-sze] (燕伋 [or 級], 字恩 [al. 子

思) a native of Ch'in. His tablet is the 24th east.

63: Chang Kwo, styled Tsze-t'u (鄭國, 字子徒), a native of Lu.

This is understood to be the same with the Hsieh Pang, styled

Tsze-ts'ung (薛邦, 字子從), of the 'Narratives of the School.' His

tablet follows No. 61.

64. Ch'in Fei, styled Tsze-chih (秦非, 字子之), a native of Lu,

having his tablet the 31st, west.

65. Shih Chih-ch'ang, styled Tsze-hang [al. ch'ang] (施之常, 字

子恆 [al. 常]), a native of Lu. His tablet is the 30th, east.

66. Yen K'wai, styled Tsze-shang (顏噲, 字子聲), a native of

Lu. His tablet is the next to that of No. 64.

67. Pu Shu-shang, styled Tsze-ch'e (步叔乘 [in the

'Narratives of the School' we have an old form of 乘], 字子車), a

native of Ch'i. Sometimes for Pu (步) we find Shao (少). His tablet

is the 30th, west.

68. Yuan K'ang, styled Tsze-chi (原亢, 字子籍), a native of Lu.

Sze-ma Ch'ien calls him Yuan K'ang-chi, not mentioning any

designation. The 'Narratives of the School' makes him Yuan K'ang

(抗), styled Chi. His tablet is the 23rd, west.

69. Yo K'o [al. Hsin], styled Tsze-shang (樂欬, [al. 欣], 字子聲),

a native of Lu. His tablet is the 25th, east.

70. Lien Chieh, styled Yung and Tsze-yung [al. Tsze-ts'ao] (廉

潔, 字庸 and 子庸 [al. 子曹), a native of Wei, or of Ch'i. His tablet is

next to that of No. 68.

71. Shu-chung Hui [al. K'wai], styled Tsze-ch'i (叔仲會 [al. 噲],

字子期), a native of Lu, or, according to Chang Hsuan, of Tsin. He

was younger than Confucius by fifty-four years. It is said that he

and another youth, called K'ung Hsuan (孔琁), attended by turns

with their pencils, and acted as amanuenses to the sage, and when

Mang Wu-po expressed a doubt of their competency, Confucius

declared his satisfaction with them. He follows Lien Chieh in the

temples.

72. Yen Ho, styled Zan (顏何, 字冉), a native of Lu. The present

copies of the 'Narratives of the School' do not contain his name,

and in A.D. 1588 Zan was displaced from his place in the temples.

His tablet, however, has been restored during the present dynasty.

It is the 33rd, west.

73. Ti Hei, styled Che [al. Tsze-che and Che-chih] (狄黑, 字晢

[al. 子晢 and 晢之]), a native of Wei, or of Lu. His tablet is the 26th,

east.

74. Kwei [al. Pang] Sun, styled Tsze-lien [al. Tsze-yin] (□

(kui1 刲左邦右) [al. 邦] 巽, 字子歛 [al. 子飲]), a native of Lu. His tablet

is the 27th, west.

75. K'ung Chung, styled Tsze-mieh (孔忠, 字子蔑). This was

the son, it is said, of Confucius's elder brother, the cripple Mang-

p'i. His tablet is next to that of No. 73. His sacrificial title is 'The

ancient Worthy, the philosopher Mieh.'

76. Kung-hsi Yu-zu [al. Yu], styled Tsze-shang (公西輿如 [al.

輿], 字子上), a native of Lu. His place is the 26th, west.

77. Kung-hsi Tien, styled Tsze-shang (公西蒧 [or 點], 字子上

[al. 子尚]), a native of Lu. His tablet is the 28th, east.

78. Ch'in Chang [al. Lao], styled Tsze-k'ai (琴張 [al. 牢], 字子

開), a native of Wei. His tablet is the 29th, west.

79. Ch'an K'ang, styled Tsze-k'ang [al. Tsze-ch'in] (陳亢, 字子

亢 [al. 子禽]), a native of Ch'an. See notes on Ana. I. x.

80. Hsien Tan [al. Tan-fu and Fang], styled Tsze-hsiang (縣亶

[al. 亶父 and 豐], 字子象), a native of Lu. Some suppose that this is

the same as No. 53. The advisers of the present dynasty in such

matters, however, have considered them to be different, and in

1724, a tablet was assigned to Hsien Tan, the 34th, west.

The three preceding names are given in the 'Narratives of

the School.'

The research of scholars has added about twenty others.

81. Lin Fang, styled Tsze-ch'iu (林放, 字子邱), a native of Lu.

The only thing known of him is from the Ana. III. iv. His tablet

was displaced under the Ming, but has been restored by the

present dynasty. It is the first, west.

82. Chu Yuan, styled Po-yu (蘧瑗, 字伯玉), an officer of Wei,

and, as appears from the Analects and Mencius, an intimate

friend of Confucius. Still his tablet has shared the same changes

as that of Lin Fang. It is now the first, east.

83 and 84. Shan Ch'ang (申棖) and Shan T'ang (申堂). See No.

57.

85. Mu P'i (牧皮), mentioned by Mencius, VII. Pt. II. xxxvii. 4.

His entrance into the temple has been under the present dynasty.

His tablet is the 34th, east.

86. Tso Ch'iu-ming or Tso-ch'iu Ming (左丘明) has the 32nd

place, east. His title was fixed in A.D. 1530 to be 'The Ancient

Scholar,' but in 1642 it was raised to that of 'Ancient Worthy.' To

him we owe the most distinguished of the annotated editions of

the Ch'un Ch'iu. But whether he really was a disciple of Confucius,

and in personal communication with him, is much debated.

The above are the only names and surnames of those of the

disciples who now share in the sacrifices to the sage. Those who

wish to exhaust the subject, mention in addition, on the authority

of Tso Ch'iu-ming, Chung-sun Ho-chi (仲孫何忌), a son of Mang Hsi

(see p. 63), and Chung-sun Shwo (仲孫說), also a son of Mang Hsi,

supposed by many to be the same with No. 17; Zu Pei, (孺悲),

mentioned in the Analects, XVII. xx, and in the Li Chi, XVIII. Sect.

II. ii. 22; Kung-wang Chih-ch'iu (公罔之裘) and Hsu Tien (序點),

mentioned in the Li Chi, XLIII. 7; Pin-mau Chia (賓牟賈), mentioned

in the Li Chi, XVII. iii. 16; K'ung Hsuan (孔琁) and Hai Shu-lan (惠叔

蘭), on the authority of the 'Narratives of the School;' Ch'ang Chi

(常季), mentioned by Chwang-tsze; Chu Yu (鞫語), mentioned by

Yen-tsze (晏子); Lien Yu (廉瑀) and Lu Chun (魯峻), on the authority

of 文翁石室; and finally Tsze-fu Ho (子服何), the Tsze-fu Ching-po

(子服景伯) of the Analects, XIV. xxxviii.

CHAPTER VI.

LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL WORKS WHICH HAVE BEEN CONSULTED IN

THE PREPARATION OF THIS VOLUME.

SECTION I.

CHINESE WORKS, WITH BRIEF NOTICES.

十三經註疏, 'The Thirteen Ching, with Commentary and

Explanations.' This is the great repertory of ancient lore upon the

Classics. On the Analects, it contains the 'Collection of

Explanations of the Lun Yu,' by Ho Yen and others (see p. 19), and

'The Correct Meaning,' or Paraphrase of Hsing Ping (see p. 20). On

the Great Learning and the Doctrine of the Mean, it contains the

comments and glosses of Chang Hsuan, and of K'ung Ying-ta (孔穎

達) of the T'ang dynasty.

新刻批點四書讀本, 'A new edition of the Four Books,

Punctuated and Annotated, for Reading.' This work was published

in the seventh year of Tao-kwang (1827) by a Kao Lin (高琳). It is

the finest edition of the Four Books which I have seen, in point of

typographical execution. It is indeed a volume for reading. It

contains the ordinary 'Collected Comments' of Chu Hsi on the

Analects, and his 'Chapters and Sentences' of the Great Learning

and Doctrine of the Mean. The editor's own notes are at the top

and bottom of the page, in rubric.

四書朱子本義匯參, 'The Proper Meaning of the Four Books as

determined by Chu Hsi, Compared with, and Illustrated from,

other Commentators.' This is a most voluminous work, published

in the tenth year of Ch'ien-lung, A.D. 1745, by Wang Pu-ch'ing (王

步青), a member of the Han-lin College. On the Great Learning and

the Doctrine of the Mean, the 'Queries' (或問) addressed to Chu Hsi

and his replies are given in the same text as the standard

commentary.

四書經註集證, 'The Four Books, Text and Commentary, with

Proofs and Illustrations.' The copy of this Work which I have was

edited by a Wang T'ing-chi (汪廷機), in the third

year of Chia-ch'ing, A.D. 1798. It may be called a commentary on

the commentary. The research in all matters of Geography,

History, Biography, Natural History, &c., is immense.

四書諸儒輯要, 'A Collection of the most important Comments

of Scholars on the Four Books.' By Li P'ei-lin (李沛霖); published in

the fifty-seventh K'ang-hsi year, A.D. 1718. This Work is about as

voluminous as the 匯參, but on a different plan. Every chapter is

preceded by a critical discussion of its general meaning, and the

logical connexion of its several paragraphs. This is followed by

the text, and Chu Hsi's standard commentary. We have then a

paraphrase, full and generally perspicuous. Next, there is a

selection of approved comments, from a great variety of authors;

and finally, the reader finds a number of critical remarks and

ingenious views, differing often from the common interpretation,

which are submitted for his examination.

四書翼註論文, 'A Supplemental Commentary, and Literary

Discussions, on the Four Books.' By Chang Chan-t'ao [al. T'i-an] (張

甄陶 [al. 惕菴]), a member of the Han-lin college, in the early part,

apparently, of the reign of Ch'ien-lung. The work is on a peculiar

plan. The reader is supposed to be acquainted with Chu Hsi's

commentary, which is not given; but the author generally supports

his views, and defends them against the criticisms of some of the

early scholars of this dynasty. His own exercitations are of the

nature of essays more than of commentary. It is a book for the

student who is somewhat advanced, rather than for the learner. I

have often perused it with interest and advantage.

四書遵註合講, 'The Four Books, according to the Commentary,

with Paraphrase.' Published in the eighth year of Yung Chang, A.D.

1730, by Wang Fu [al. K'eh-fu] (翁復 [al. 克夫]). Every page is

divided into two parts. Below, we have the text and Chu Hsi's

commentary. Above, we have an analysis of every chapter,

followed by a paraphrase of the several paragraphs. To the

paraphrase of each paragraph are subjoined critical notes,

digested from a great variety of scholars, but without the

mention of their names. A list of 116 is given who are thus laid

under contribution. In addition, there are maps and illustrative

figures at the commencement; and to each Book there are prefixed

biographical notices, explanations of peculiar allusions, &c.

新增四書補註附考備旨, 'The Four Books, with a

Complete Digest of Supplements to the Commentary, and

additional Suggestions. A new edition, with Additions.' By Tu

Ting-chi (杜定基). Published A.D. 1779. The original of this Work

was by Tang Lin (鄧林), a scholar of the Ming dynasty. It is perhaps

the best of all editions of the Four Books for a learner. Each page

is divided into three parts. Below, is the text divided into

sentences and members of sentences, which are followed by short

glosses. The text is followed by the usual commentary, and that

by a paraphrase, to which are subjoined the Supplements and

Suggestions. The middle division contains a critical analysis of

the chapters and paragraphs; and above, there are the necessary

biographical and other notes.

四書味根錄, 'The Four Books, with the Relish of the Radical

Meaning.' This is a new Work, published in 1852. It is the

production of Chin Ch'ang, styled Chi'u-t'an (金澂, 字秋潭), an

officer and scholar, who, returning, apparently to Canton

province, from the North in 1836, occupied his retirement with

reviewing his literary studies of former years, and employed his

sons to transcribe his notes. The writer is fully up in all the

commentaries on the Classics, and pays particular attention to

the labours of the scholars of the present dynasty. To the

Analects, for instance, there is prefixed Chiang Yung's History of

Confucius, with criticisms on it by the author himself. Each

chapter is preceded by a critical analysis. Then follows the text

with the standard commentary, carefully divided into sentences,

often with glosses, original and selected, between them. To the

commentary there succeeds a paraphrase, which is not copied by

the author from those of his predecessors. After the paraphrase

we have Explanations (解). The book is beautifully printed, and in

small type, so that it is really a multum in parvo, with

considerable freshness.

日講四書義解, 'A Paraphrase for Daily Lessons, Explaining the

Meaning of the Four Books.' This work was produced in 1677, by a

department of the members of the Han-lin college, in obedience to

an imperial rescript. The paraphrase is full, perspicuous, and

elegant.

御製周易折中; 書經傳說彙纂; 詩經傳說彙纂; 禮記義疏; 春秋傳說彙纂.

These works form together a superb edition of the Five Ching,

published by imperial authority

in the K'ang-hsi and Yung-chang reigns. They contain the standard

views (傳); various opinions (說); critical decisions of the editors

(晏) ; prolegomena; plates or cuts; and other apparatus for the

student.

毛西河先生全集, 'The Collected Writings of Mao Hsi-ho.' See

prolegomena, p. 20. The voluminousness of his Writings is

understated there. Of 經集, or Writings on the Classics, there are

236 sections, while his 文集, or other literary compositions,

amount to 257 sections. His treatises on the Great Learning and

the Doctrine of the Mean have been especially helpful to me. He is

a great opponent of Chu Hsi, and would be a much more effective

one, if he possessed the same graces of style as that 'prince of

literature.'

四書拓餘說, 'A Collection of Supplemental Observations on

the Four Books.' The preface of the author, Ts'ao Chih-shang (曹之

升), is dated in 1795, the last year of the reign of Ch'ien-lung. The

work contains what we may call prolegomena on each of the Four

Books, and then excursus on the most difficult and disputed

passages. The tone is moderate, and the learning displayed

extensive and solid. The views of Chu Hsi are frequently well

defended from the assaults of Mao Hsi-ho. I have found the Work

very instructive.

鄉黨圖考, 'On the Tenth Book of the Analects, with Plates.'

This Work was published by the author, Chiang Yung (江永), in the

twenty-first Ch'ien-lung year, A.D. 1761, when he was seventy-

six years old. It is devoted to the illustration of the above portion

of the Analects, and is divided into ten sections, the first of

which consists of woodcuts and tables. The second contains the

Life of Confucius, of which I have largely availed myself in the

preceding chapter. The whole is a remarkable specimen of the

minute care with which Chinese scholars have illustrated the

Classical Books

四書釋地; 四書釋地續; 四書釋地又續; 四書釋地三續. We may call

these volumes-- 'The Topography of the Four Books; with three

Supplements.' The Author's name is Yen Zo-ch'u (閻若璩). The first

volume was published in 1698, and the second in 1700. I have not

been able to find the dates of publication of the other two, in

which there is more biographical and general matter than

topographical. The author apologizes for the inappropriateness of

their titles by saying that he could not

help calling them Supplements to the Topography, which was his

'first love.'

皇清經解, 'Explanations of the Classics, under the Imperial

Ts'ing Dynasty.' See above, p. 20. The Work, however, was not

published, as I have there supposed, by imperial authority, but

under the superintendence, and at the expense (aided by other

officers), of Yuan Yuan (阮元), Governor-general of Kwang-tung

and Kwang-hsi, in the ninth year of the last reign, 1829. The

publication of so extensive a Work shows a public spirit and zeal

for literature among the high officers of China, which should keep

foreigners from thinking meanly of them.

孔子家語, 'Sayings of the Confucian Family.' Family is to be

taken in the sense of Sect or School. In Liu Hsin's Catalogue, in

the subdivision devoted to the Lun Yu, we find the entry:--

'Sayings of the Confucian Family, twenty-seven Books,' with a

note by Yen Sze-ku of the T'ang dynasty,-- 'Not the existing Work

called the Family Sayings.' The original Work was among the

treasures found in the wall of Confucius's old house, and was

deciphered and edited by K'ung An-kwo. The present Work is by

Wang Su of the Wei (魏) dynasty, grounded professedly on the

older one, the blocks of which had suffered great dilapidation

during the intervening centuries. It is allowed also, that, since

Su's time, the Work has suffered more than any of the

acknowledged Classics. Yet it is a very valuable fragment of

antiquity, and it would be worth while to incorporate it with the

Analects. My copy is the edition of Li Yung (李容), published in

1780. I have generally called the Work 'Narratives of the School.'

聖廟祀典圖考, 'Sacrificial Canon of the Sage's Temples, with

Plates.' This Work, published in 1826, by Ku Yuan, styled Hsiang-

chau (顧沅, 字湘舟), is a very painstaking account of all the Names

sacrificed to in the temples of Confucius, the dates of their

attaining to that honour, &c. There are appended to it Memoirs of

Confucius and Mencius, which are not of so much value.

十子全書, 'The Complete Works of the Ten Tsze.' See

Morrison's Dictionary, under the character 子. I have only had

occasion, in connexion with this Work, to refer to the writings of

Chwang-tsze (莊子) and Lieh-tsze (列子). My copy is an edition of

1804.

歷代名賢列女氏姓譜, 'A Cyclopaeia of Surnames, or

Biographical Dictionary, of the Famous Men and Virtuous Women

of the Successive Dynasties.' This is a very notable work of its

class; published in 1793, by 蕭智漢, and extending through 157

chapters or Books.

文獻通考, 'General Examination of Records and Scholars.' This

astonishing Work, which cost its author, Ma Twan-lin (馬端臨),

twenty years' labour, was first published in 1321. Remusat says,-

- 'This excellent Work is a library in itself, and if Chinese

literature possessed no other, the language would be worth

learning for the sake of reading this alone.' It does indeed display

all but incredible research into every subject connected with the

Government, History, Literature, Religion, &c., of the empire of

China. The author's researches are digested in 348 Books. I have

had occasion to consult principally those on the Literary

Monuments, embraced in seventy-six Books, from the 174th to the

249th.

朱彝尊經義考, 'An Examination of the Commentaries on the

Classics,' by Chu I-tsun. The author was a member of the Han-lin

college, and the work was first published with an imperial

preface by the Ch'ien-lung emperor. It is an exhaustive work on

the literature of the Classics, in 300 chapters or Books.'

續文獻通考, 'A Continuation of the General Examination of

Records and Scholars.' This Work, which is in 254 Books, and

nearly as extensive as the former, was the production of Wang

Ch'i (王圻), who dates his preface in 1586, the fourteenth year of

Wan-li, the style of the reign of the fourteenth emperor of the

Ming dynasty. Wang Ch'i brings down the Work of his predecessor

to his own times. He also frequently goes over the same ground,

and puts things in a clearer light. I have found this to be the case

in the chapters on the classical and other Books.

二十四史, 'The Twenty-four Histories.' These are the

imperially-authorized records of the empire, commencing with

the 'Historical Records,' the work of Sze-ma Ch'ien, and ending

with the History of the Ming dynasty, which appeared in 1742, the

result of the joint labours of 145 officers and scholars of the

present dynasty. The extent of the collection may be understood

from this, that my copy, bound in English fashion, makes sixty-

three volumes, each one larger than this. No nation has a history

so thoroughly digested; and on the whole it is trustworthy. In pre-

paring this volume, my necessities have been confined mostly to

the Works of Sze-ma Ch'ien, and his successor, Pan Ku (班固), the

Historian of the first Han dynasty.

歷代統記表, 'The Annals of the Nation.' Published by imperial

authority in 1803, the eighth year of Ch'ia-ch'ing. This Work is

invaluable to a student, being, indeed, a collection of

chronological tables, where every year, from the rise of the Chau

dynasty, B.C. 1121, has a distinct column to itself, in which, in

different compartments, the most important events are noted.

Beyond that date, it ascends to nearly the commencement of the

cycles in the sixty-first year of Hwang-ti, giving -- not every

year, but the years of which anything has been mentioned in

history. From Hwang-ti also, it ascends through the dateless ages

up to P'an-ku, the first of mortal sovereigns.

歷代疆域表, 'The Boundaries of the Nation in the successive

Dynasties.' This Work by the same author, and published in 1817,

does for the boundaries of the empire the same service which the

preceding renders to its chronology.

歷代沿革表, 'The Topography of the Nation in the successive

Dynasties.' Another Work by the same author, and of the same date

as the preceding.

___________________________

The Dictionaries chiefly consulted have been:--

The well-known Shwo Wan (說文解字), by Hsu Shan, styled

Shu-chung (許慎, 字叔重), published in A.D. 100; with the

supplement (繫傳) by Hsu Ch'ieh (徐鍇), of the southern Tang

dynasty. The characters are arranged in the Shwo Wan under 540

keys or radicals, as they are unfortunately termed.

The Liu Shu Ku (六書故), by Tai T'ung, styled Chung-ta (戴侗,

字仲達), of our thirteenth century. The characters are arranged in

it, somewhat after the fashion of the R Ya (p. 2), under six general

divisions, which again are subdivided, according to the affinity of

subjects, into various categories.

The Tsze Hui (字彙), which appeared in the Wan-li (萬歷)

reign of the Ming dynasty (1573-1619). The 540 radicals of the

Shwo Wan were reduced in this to 214, at which number they have

since continued.

The K'ang-hsi Tsze Tien (康熙字典), or Kang-hsi Dictionary,

prepared by order of the great K'ang-hsi emperor in 1716. This

is the most common and complete of all Chinese dictionaries for

common use.

The I Wan Pi Lan (蓺文備覽), 'A Complete Exhibition of all the

Authorized Characters,' published in 1787; 'furnishing,' says Dr.

Williams, 'good definitions of all the common characters, whose

ancient forms are explained.'

The Pei Wan Yun Fu (佩文韻府), generally known among

foreigners as 'The Kang-hsi Thesaurus.' It was undertaken by an

imperial order, and published in 1711, being probably, as Wylie

says, 'the most extensive work of a lexicographical character

ever produced.' It does for the phraseology of Chinese literature

all, and more than all, that the Kang-hsi dictionary does for the

individual characters. The arrangement of the characters is

according to their tones and final sounds. My copy of it, with a

supplement published about ten years later, is in forty-five large

volumes, with much more letter-press in it than the edition of

the Dynastic Histories mentioned on p. 133.

The Ching Tsi Tswan Ku, ping Pu Wei (經籍□(纂上饗下)詁并補

遺), 'A Digest of the Meanings in the Classical and other Books,

with Supplement,' by, or rather under the superintendence of, Yuan

Yuan (p. 132). This has often been found useful. It is arranged

according to the tones and rhymes like the characters in the

Thesaurus.

SECTION II.

TRANSLATIONS AND OTHER WORKS.

CONFUCIUS SINARUM PHILOSOPHUS; sive Scientia Sinensis

Latine Exposita. Studio et opera Prosperi Intorcetta, Christiani

Herdritch, Francisci Rougemont, Philippi Couplet, Patrum

Societatis JESU. Jussu Ludovici Magni. Parisiis, 1837.

THE WORKS OF CONFUCIUS; containing the Original Text,

with a Translation. Vol. 1. By J. Marshman. Serampore, 1809. This

is only a fragment of 'The Works of Confucius.'

THE FOUR BOOKS; Translated into English, by Rev. David

Collie, of the London Missionary Society. Malacca, 1828.

L'INVARIABLE MILIEU; Ouvrage Moral de Tseu-sse, en Chinois

et en Mandchou, avec une Version litterale Latine, une Traduction

Francoise, &c. &c. Par M. Abel-Remusat. A Paris, 1817.

LE TA HIO, OU LA GRANDE ETUDE; Traduit en Francoise, avec

une Version Latine, &c. Par G. Pauthier. Paris, 1837.

Y-KING; Antiquissimus Sinarum Liber, quem ex Latina

Interpretatione P. Regis, aliorumque ex Soc. JESU PP. edidit Julius

Mohl. Stuttgartiae et Tubingae, 1839.

MEMOIRES concernant L'Histoire, Les Sciences, Les Arts, Les

Moers, Les Usages, &c., des Chinois. Par les Missionaires de Pekin.

A Paris, 1776-1814.

HISTOIRE GENERALE DE LA CHINE; ou Annales de cet Empire.

Traduites du Tong-Kien-Kang-Mou. Par le feu Pere Joseph-Annie-

Marie de Moyriac de Mailla, Jesuite Francoise, Missionaire a Pekin.

A Paris, 1776-1785.

NOTITIA LINGUAE SINICAE. Auctore P. Premare. Malaccae,

cura Academiae Anglo-Sinensis, 1831.

THE CHINESE REPOSITORY. Canton, China, 20 vols., 1832-

1851.

DICTIONNAIRE DES NOMS, Anciens et Modernes, des Villes et

Arrondissements de Premier, Deuxieme, et Troisieme ordre,

compris dans L'Empire Chinois, &c. Par Edouard Biot, Membre du

Conseil de la Societe Asiatique. Paris, 1842.

THE CHINESE. By John Francis Davis, Esq., F.R.S., &c. In two

volumes. London, 1836.

CHINA: its State and Prospects. By W. H. Medhurst, D. D., of

the London Missionary Society. London, 1838.

L'UNIVERS: Histoire et Description des tous les Peuples.

Chine. Par M. G. Pauthier. Paris, 1838.

HISTORY OF CHINA, from the earliest Records to the Treaty

with Great Britain in 1842. By Thomas Thornton, Esq., Member of

the Royal Asiatic Society. In two volumes. London, 1844.

THE MIDDLE KINGDOM: A Survey of the Geography,

Government, Education, Social Life, Arts, Religion, &c., of the

Chinese Empire. By S. Wells Williams, LL.D. In two volumes. New

York and London, 1848. The Second Edition, Revised, 1883.

THE RELIGIOUS CONDITION OF THE CHINESE. By Rev. Joseph

Edkins, B. A., of the London Missionary Society. London, 1859.

CHRIST AND OTHER MASTERS. By Charles Hardwood, M. A.,

Christian Advocate in the University of Cambridge. Part III.

Religions of China, America, and Oceanica. Cambridge, 1858.

INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF. CHINESE CHARACTERS. By J.

Edkins, D.D. London, 1876.

THE STRUCTURE OF CHINESE CHARACTERS, under 300

Primary Forms. By John Chalmers, M.A., LL.D. Aberdeen, 1882.

The Chinese Classics — Prolegomena · 第 5 / 5 章