IRISH BEAUTIES.

Strictures on change of manners—Moral influence of dress—The three

beauties—Curious trial respecting Lady M—— —Termination favourable to

her Ladyship—Interesting and affecting incidents of that lady’s

life—Sir R—— M——, his character, and cruelty—Lady M—— married against

her will—Quits her husband—Returns—Sir R. mistakes her for a rebel in

his sleep, and nearly strangles her.

It is singular enough, but at the same time true, that female beauty has

of late years kept pace in improvement with modern accomplishments. She

who in the early part of my life would have been accounted a perfect

beauty,—and whose touch upon a harpsichord or spinnet, accompanied by a

simple air sung with what they then called “judgment,” (in tune,) would

have constituted her a syren as well as a Venus, would now be passed by

merely as “a pretty girl, but such a confounded _bore_ with her music!”

In fact, women fifty years since (and much later) not being, generally

speaking, thrust into society till they had arrived at the age of

maturity, were more respected, more beloved, and more sedulously

attended than in these days, when the men seem to have usurped the

ladies’ corsets, to affect their voices, practise their gait, imitate

their small-talk, and, in surtouts and trowsers, hustle ladies off the

foot-paths, to save their own dog-skins from humidity.

This degradation of both sexes has arisen from various causes. Beauty is

now less rare, accomplishments more common, dress less distinguished,

dignity worse preserved, and decorum less attended to, than in former

times. It is a great mistake in women not to recollect their own

importance, and keep up that just medium between reserve and familiarity

which constitutes the best criterion whereby to appreciate the manners

of a gentlewoman. But women are too apt to run into extremes in every

thing; and overlook the fact, that neither personal beauty nor

drawing-room display are calculated to form permanent attractions, even

to the most adoring lover.—The _breakfast-table_ in the morning, and

_fire-side_ in the evening, must be the ultimate touch-stones of

connubial comfort; and this is a maxim which any woman who intends to

marry should never lose sight of.

To such lengths did respect for the fair sex extend, and so strong was

the impression formerly that men were bound to protect it even from

accidental offence, that I remember the time, (indeed I witnessed two

instances,) when, if any gentleman presumed to pass between a lady and

the wall in walking the streets of Dublin, he was considered as offering

a personal affront to her escort; and if the parties wore swords, (as

was then customary,) it is probable the first salutation to the offender

would be—“Draw, sir!” However, such affairs usually ended in an apology

to the lady for inadvertence, scarcely ever proceeding to extremities

unless the offence was premeditated.

But if a man ventured to intrude into the boxes of the theatre in his

surtout, or boots, or with his hat on, it was regarded as a general

insult to every lady present, and he had little chance of escaping

without a shot or a thrust before the following night. Every gentleman

then wore in the evening a sword, a queue, and a three-cocked

hat—appointments rather too fierce-looking for the modern dandy! whilst

the morning dress consisted of what was then called a French frock,

(having no skirt-pockets,) a waistcoat bordered with lace, velvet or

silk breeches, silk stockings, pumps, and a _couteau de chasse_, with a

short, curved broad blade—the handle of green ivory, with a lion’s head

in silver or gilt at the end, and a treble chain dangling loose from its

mouth, terminating at an ornamented cross or guard, which surmounted the

green scabbard. Such was the costume: but although either the male or

female attire of that day might now appear rather grotesque, yet people

of fashion had then the exclusive dress and air of such, and ladies ran

no risk of being copied in garb or manner, or rivalled, perhaps

surpassed, by their pretty waiting-maids—now called “young persons!”—who

not unfrequently first ape, then traduce, and next supplant, their

mistresses. The _nice_ young governesses also, (of twenty,) now selected

to instruct young ladies of seventeen, present a modern system of

education to which, I believe, Doctors Commons is under obligation.

The Irish court at that period was kept up with great state, and hence

the parties who frequented it were more select. I recollect when the

wives and daughters of attorneys (who now, I believe, are the general

occupiers of the red benches, then solely the seats of nobles) were

never admitted to the viceregal drawing-rooms. How far the present

growing system of equality in appearance among different ranks will

eventually benefit or injure society in general, is for casuists, not

for me, to determine. I must, however, take occasion to own myself an

admirer, and (whenever it is proper) a zealous contender for distinction

of ranks; and to state my decided opinion, that superior talents,

learning, military reputation, or some other quality which raises men by

general assent, should alone be permitted to amalgamate common with high

society. Nature, by conferring talent, points out those whom she

intended to distinguish: but “free agency” too frequently counteracts

the _intention_ of Nature, and great talent is often overpowered, and

lost in a crowd of inferior propensities.

It is an observation I have always made, (although it may be perhaps

considered a frivolous one,) that dress has a moral effect upon the

conduct of mankind. Let any gentleman find himself with dirty boots, old

surtout, soiled neckcloth, and a general negligence of dress, he will,

in all probability, find a corresponding disposition to negligence of

address. He may, _en deshabille_, curse and swear, speak roughly and

think coarsely: but put the same man into full dress; powder, or at

least curl him well, clap a sword by his side, and give him an evening

coat, waistcoat, breeches, and silk stockings, lace ruffles and a

_chapeau bras_, and he will feel himself quite another person!—To use

the language of the blackguard would then be out of character: he will

talk smoothly, affect politeness if he has it not, pique himself upon

good manners, and respect the women: nor will the spell subside until,

returning home, the old _robe de chambre_ (or its substitute surtout),

the heelless slippers, with other slovenly appendages, make him lose

again his brief consciousness of being a gentleman!

Some women mistake the very nature and purposes of dress: glaring

abroad, they are slatterns at home. The husband detests in his _sposa_

what he is too apt to practise himself: he rates a dirty wife; she

retorts upon a filthy husband, and each of them detests the other for

that neglect of person which neither will take the trouble of avoiding,

except to encounter strangers.

Two ladies, about the period of my entrance into public life, and

another some time after, became very conspicuous for their beauty,

though extremely different in all points both of appearance and manners.

They still live:—two of them I greatly admired—not for beauty alone, but

for an address the most captivating; and one of these, especially, for

the kindest heart and the soundest sense, when she gave it fair play,

that I have (often) met with amongst females.

In admitting my great preference for this individual lady, I may,

perhaps, be accused of partiality, less to herself than to a family:—be

it so!—she was the wife of my friend, and I esteem her for his sake: but

she is an excellent woman, and I esteem the Honourable Mrs. C.

Hutchinson also for her own.

Another of the ladies alluded to, Lady M—, is a gentlewoman of high

birth, and was then, though not _quite_ a beauty, in all points

attractive: indeed, her entire person was symmetrical and graceful. She

passed her spring in misfortune—her summer in misery—her autumn without

happiness!—but I hope the winter of her days is spent amidst every

comfort. Of the third lady I have not yet spoken:—though far inferior to

both the former, she has succeeded better in life than either; and,

beginning the world without any pretensions beyond mediocrity, is likely

to end her days in ease and more than ordinary respectability.

My first knowledge of Lady M— arose from a circumstance which was to me

of singular professional advantage; and, as it forms a curious anecdote,

I will proceed to relate it.

At the assizes of Wexford, while I was but young at the bar, I received

a brief in a cause of Sir R—— M——, Bart., against a Mr. H——. On perusal,

I found it was an action brought by the baronet against the latter

gentleman respecting his lady, and that I was retained as advocate for

the lady’s honour. It was my “first appearance” in that town. But, alas!

I had a _senior_ in the business; and therefore was without opportunity

of attempting any display. The ill-fated Bagenal Harvey[30] was that

senior counsel, and he had prepared himself to make some exhibition in a

cause of so much and such universal excitement. I felt dispirited, and

would willingly have given up twenty fees to possess his opportunity.

-----

Footnote 30:

An unfortunate friend of mine who was afterward hanged, and his head

stuck over the door of the same court-house.

-----

The cause proceeded before Judge Kelly: the evidence of Sir R—— M—— was

finished, and the proper time for the defence had arrived; every thing

as to the lady was at stake. Bagenal Harvey had gone out to take fresh

air, and probably to read over some notes, or con some florid sentences

and quotations with which he intended to interlard his elocution. At the

moment the evidence closed the judge desired me to proceed. I replied,

that Mr. Harvey, my senior, would return into court directly.

Judge Kelly, who was my friend, said he would not delay public business

one minute for anybody; and, by a sort of instinct, or rather impulse,—I

cannot indeed exactly say what it was, but certainly it was totally

_impromptu_,—I began to state her ladyship’s case. I always had words

enough at command: the evidence afforded sufficient material for their

exercise; and, in fact, being roused by the cause into a sort of

knight-errantry, I felt myself completely identified with it. If I

should succeed, it would greatly serve me. I forgot poor Bagenal Harvey,

and was just getting into the marrow and pathos of my case, when the

crier shouted out “Clear the way for Counsellor Harvey!” Bagenal came

in, puffing and blowing, and struggling through the crowd—scarcely able

to command utterance. I instantly stopped, and begged his pardon, adding

that the judge had said the public time could wait for nobody! “So,”

continued I, “let me just show you where I left off! (turning over the

leaves of my brief:)—there, begin there—it will be useless to repeat

what I have already said; so begin there.” A loud laugh succeeded.

Bagenal, though generally very good-tempered, became irritated as much

as he was susceptible of being, and whispered me that he considered it a

personal insult: while old Judge Kelly gravely said, “Go on, Mr.

Barrington, go on! we can have no speeches by dividends: go on, sir!” So

on I went, and I believe, (because every body told me so,) that my

impromptu speech was entirely successful. I discredited the witnesses by

ridicule, destroyed all sympathy with the husband, and interested every

body for the wife. In short, I got the judge and jury into good-humour.

Yet, I know not that I should have ensured a verdict, had not a certain

point of law, which I believe was then started for the first time,

occurred to me; and which, though rational in itself, and on that trial

recognised by the judge, has since been overruled in _terms_, though it

stands in _substance_;—namely, if a husband cannot truly aver that he

has sustained mental injury by the loss of that comfort arising from the

_society_ of a wife, it is anomalous to say he has any claim to damages;

and this averment can scarcely be made where the parties have been

separated voluntarily and completely for years.[31]

-----

Footnote 31:

This is, indeed, altogether a species of action, placing a price upon

dishonour, maintained in no country but England (a money country). Why

not transfer the offence to the _criminal_ side of the courts of

justice? All the rest of Europe ridicules our system. The idea

entertained on the continent upon such occasions is _silence_ or

_death_!—if not the most lucrative, certainly the most _honourable_

mode of procedure.—An _affectionate_ husband cannot be recompensed by

_any_ thing, and a _rich_ seducer cannot be _punished_. But if the

gentleman was to be sent to a _tread_-mill, and the lady to _solitary_

confinement, adultery would soon be as much out of fashion as it is

now the _haut goût_.

-----

The judge, the kindest-hearted man living, chuckled at this new point.

The jury, who did not much admire the plaintiff, were quite pleased with

my suggestion; and after the judge had given his charge, in a few

minutes, to the utter discomfiture of the baronet, there was a verdict

against him! His lips quivered; he stood pale and trembling with anger;

and subsequently quitted the town with the utmost expedition.

Some time after, a complete reconciliation took place between the

parties, so far that her ladyship consented to live with him

again—influenced much, I rather think, by having suffered great

inconvenience, if not distress, from want of regularity in the receipt

of her separate maintenance of 700_l._ per annum. I had the pleasure of

meeting her frequently afterwards at the lady lieutenant’s parties.

The conclusion of the renewed intercourse is too curious to be omitted.

Sir R—— had taken a house in Nassau Street, in the city of Dublin; and

it was thought possible that he and his wife might, at any rate, pass

some time under the same roof: but fate decided otherwise.

Sir R—— was literally insane on all political subjects, his imagination

being occupied, night and day, with nothing but papists, jesuits, popes,

priests, and rebels. Once in the dead of the night his lady was awakened

by a sense of positive suffocation, and rousing herself, found that Sir

R—— was in the very act of strangling her!—He had grasped her by the

throat with all his might, and, muttering heavy imprecations, had nearly

succeeded in his diabolical attempt.—She struggled, and at length

extricated herself from his grasp; upon which he roared out, making a

fresh effort—“You infernal _papist rebel_! you United Irishman! You

_eternal villain_! I’ll never part from you alive, if you don’t come

quietly to the guard-house!”

In fact this crazy Orange-man had in his dream fancied that he was

contesting with a rebel, whom he had better choke than suffer to escape,

and poor Lady M—— was nearly sacrificed to his excess of loyalty. In her

_robe de chambre_ and slippers she contrived to get out of the house,

and never more ventured to return, as she now clearly perceived that

even her personal safety could not be calculated on in her husband’s

society.

I have in another work given a full character of Sir R—— M——, and stated

my opinion of his worse than mischievous history of Ireland. One more

anecdote of him, and I have done.

Whilst he was high sheriff for the county of Waterford, an old man was

sentenced to be whipped at the cart’s tail for some political offence;

when, the executioner not being in readiness, the _high sheriff_,—a

baronet and member of Parliament,—took up the cat-o’-nine-tails, ordered

the cart to move on _slowly_, and operated himself with admirable

expertness, but much greater severity than the hangman would have

used!—Thus did he proceed to whip the old man through the streets of the

city; and when the extreme point was reached, the sentence executed, and

he was scarcely able to raise his arm, he publicly regretted he had not

a little farther to go!

Lady M—— was, in her own right, entitled to a fortune of 15,000_l._, to

be paid only on her marriage. Her father, a gentleman of rank and

estate, had by some mismanagement in office become extremely

embarrassed. Sir R— M—, a man of family, but whose fortune was not

large, cast his eye on her beauty—not totally overlooking her property.

His taste was indisputably good; the lady being, at that period, every

thing that could be desired! She possessed an ardent mind, great

constitutional gaiety, and a sensitive heart;—to which were added a most

engaging figure and a lovely and expressive countenance. Her father she

loved dearly; and for his unhappy circumstances, therefore, her heart

bled; but Sir R— M— could make no impression upon it. On the contrary,

he excited her aversion.—Thus her affections being unattainable, the

baronet resolved, if possible, to _purchase_ her hand, leaving her heart

to some future opportunity! Hence commences the affecting narrative of

her ladyship’s wrongs and misfortunes, related to me by herself, almost

unconsciously, in broken fragments, and at several times.

“I was not aware (said she) what caused my dear father’s obvious

unhappiness, and often was I surprised at the pertinacity with which he

pressed the baronet upon my consideration. I rejected him over and over

again; still his suit was renewed, still my father appeared more anxious

on his behalf, whilst my mother seconded their wishes.—My aversion

increased; yet Sir R— M—’s assiduities were redoubled with his repulses;

and at length I contemplated the leaving my father’s house, if I were

longer persecuted by these addresses.

“Though young, I knew the failing of my own character, which possessed

not sufficient resolution to oppose its constitutional tendencies.

Nature had formed me for all the pleasures and the pains which are alike

inseparable from sensibility. I found a glow in every thought—an

enthusiasm in every action. My feelings were always _in earnest_. I

could love to excess, and hate to rancour! but I could do neither with

mediocrity. I could be the best or the worst of wives. I could endure

any thing with a man I loved, but could not sit upon a throne with one

whom I detested.

“At length, I discovered the whole of my father’s more than pressing

embarrassments; and understood that Sir R— M— had agreed to give up to

him a considerable portion of my fortune if our marriage was effected.

This shock to such a disposition as mine was cruel; and the dilemma was

distracting: it involved my father’s comforts—or my own misery!

“Often, as we sat at our family repasts, have I perceived that dear

parent lay down the fork he was conveying to his lips, and turn away to

conceal the agitation of mind which might have betrayed to us that

distress he was endeavouring to conceal.

“Gradually, I found that filial affection was taking the strongest hold

of me. I thought I could endure unhappiness myself, but I could not bear

to see my father miserable. I weighed the consequences, and reasoned so

far as I possessed the faculty of reasoning. I saw his ruin or my own

was inevitable!

“The struggle was, indeed, sharp—it was long—it was _very_ painful: but

at length filial piety prevailed over self; and I determined upon making

the sacrifice. I communicated to my father my decision to admit the

addresses of Sir R— M—, without hinting at my true reasons; but, at the

same moment, I felt an indescribable change of character commence,

which, from that sad period, has more or less affected every action of

my life. I felt a sort of harsh sensation arise within my mind, and

operate upon my temper, to which they had previously been strangers. My

spirits flagged,—all pleasures grew insipid; and I perceived that the

ice of indifference was chilling the sensibility of my nature.

“From the moment of my assent, my father’s disposition seemed to have

undergone almost as radical a change as my own. He became once more

cheerful, and I had at least the gratification of reflecting that, if I

were myself lost, I had saved a parent! But I must remark that it was

not so as to my mother—who, indeed, had not been kind to me.

“In due time the settlements were prepared, and my fortune, I learnt,

secretly divided. The ceremony was about to be performed, and Sir R— M—

at that very hour appeared to me to be the most disagreeable of mankind.

There was a sort of uncouth civility—an abrupt, fiery, coarse

expression, even in his most conciliating manners, which seemed to set

all feelings of respect or cordiality at defiance. As to love, he was

not susceptible of the passion; whilst I was created to enjoy its

tenderest blessings. He was half mad by nature;—I had become so from

misery! and in this state of mind we met to be united at the altar! I

was determined, however, that he should learn by anticipation what he

had to expect from me as a wife. ‘Sir R— M—, (said I to him,) I am

resolved to give you the last proof you will ever receive of my candour.

I accept you, not only as a husband whom I never can love, and never

will obey, but whom I absolutely detest!—now marry me at your peril, and

take the consequences!’—He laughed convulsively, took me by the hand,

and having led me into the next room, that ceremony was performed to

which I should have thought a sentence of death preferable. The moment

we were united I retired to my chamber, where tears, flowing in

torrents, cooled my heated feelings. My purpose in marrying was

effected: I therefore determined that (if possible) I never would live

an hour in his society, and it was two months before my ill-fated stars

compelled me to become the actual wife of the most unfeeling and

abominable of fanatics.

“Our residence together of course was short, and at twenty-one I was

thrown upon the world, to avoid my husband’s society. Being possessed of

sufficient means, I travelled; and for the fourteen years of our

separation my whole time was an unnatural and continued strife between

passion and propriety. On a late occasion, you were my counsel, and from

you nothing has been concealed. You did me more than justice—you have

defeated him, and preserved me!”

I have not seen her ladyship for these many years; but never did I meet

with one whom I conceived to be more completely thrown away, or whose

natural disposition seemed better calculated to lead to her own

happiness and to the happiness of those within her sphere of influence.

I speak of her as she was when I knew her; and I have no reason to alter

my impressions. Her father, mother, and husband, are all gone: how she

is situated with regard to her surviving connexions, I know not.

Personal sketches of his own times, Vol. 1 (of 3) · 第 70 / 106 题