CHAPTER IV.

THE BREAD OF THE CLASSIC LANDS.

As an introduction to the bread of the Romans and Greeks, let us

begin with the pretty myth of Demeter (or Ceres, as the Romans called

her), and her daughter Persephone. Zeus, or Jupiter, had promised

his daughter Persephone to Pluto, without informing Demeter of his

plan, and whilst the girl was plucking flowers which Zeus had caused

to grow, in order to fix her attention, Pluto seized her, and, the

earth opening, they disappeared, and went to his kingdom of Hades.

Many places have been assigned as the spot where this took place; but

the ancient Eleusis, not far from Salamis or Athens, now the little

village of Lefsina, has, if such a thing were possible, perhaps

the prior claim, for here stood the famous temple of Demeter, now

lately (1882-89) excavated and surveyed, and here were performed the

Eleusinian mysteries in her honour.

The shrieks of Persephone were heard only by Hecate and Helios; and

her mother, hearing only the echo of her voice, at once darted down

to earth in search of her beloved child. Hopelessly and aimlessly she

wandered about, caring nothing for herself; and for nine whole days and

nights neither ate nor drank, tasted neither nectar nor ambrosia, nor

did she even bathe herself. On the tenth day she met Hecate, who told

her all she knew of her daughter’s disappearance, which was not much,

as she had heard but her piercing cries. But, thinking that Helios,

the all-seeing sun, might have viewed the scene, they hastened to him,

and he told them how it all happened: how Pluto had carried off her

daughter, with the approval and consent of Zeus.

Heart-broken at this conduct of the father of her child, she would have

no more of the society of the gods, and forswore Olympus, preferring to

live rather among men on earth. And so she dwelt among them, rewarding

those who were kind to her and severely punishing those who did not

treat her well; and in this way, still wandering and mourning for her

lost child, she came to Eleusis, where Celeus was king.

But her wrath was still as fierce as ever, and, by withholding her

gifts, the fields produced no crops, and there was famine upon earth,

and so sore indeed did it become that Zeus, perceiving it, feared that

the race of man might become extinct for lack of food, and sent Iris

as ambassador to try and persuade Demeter to return to Olympus. But

she was firm, although all the gods were sent to her to induce her to

relent, and nothing would she do to mitigate the evil she had wrought,

save on the condition that her daughter should be restored to her.

[Illustration: THE LEGEND OF DEMETER AND TRIPTOLEMUS.]

Hermes was sent to Pluto, and his mission met with partial success.

Persephone had eaten of the pomegranate seed, which sacredly pledged

her to her dread lord; and for three months in the year she must

leave her mother and the fair earth and go to live in Pluto’s dreary

kingdom. Hermes fulfilled his mission by restoring her to her loving

mother, who rejoiced over her with an exceeding joy. Zeus, choosing

this happy moment, sent Rhea to Demeter to conciliate her and prevail

upon her to return to Olympus—a task which she happily effected. The

earth smiled once more and became fertile, and Demeter, with her

daughter, to whom she was lent for nine months in the year, went to

dwell once more in the companionship of the gods; but, before she left

the earth, she rewarded Celeus, the King of Eleusis, who had been kind

to her, by giving his son, Triptolemus, a chariot with winged dragons

and seeds of wheat. His chariot was useful, for by means of it he was

able to ride all over the earth, and instruct men in growing corn.

He established the worship of Demeter at Eleusis, and instituted the

mysteries in honour of the goddess.

And in this pretty myth of Demeter and Persephone we may trace the

story of the seasons; how for nine months the earth is smiling and

fertile, and for the remaining three is dead.

Dr. Schliemann claimed to have found the site of ancient Troy when he

uncovered the hill of Hissarlik. It was undoubtedly the remains of a

pre-historic city, and one which had advanced to a considerable amount

of civilisation. And this is shown particularly in one instance, in the

huge earthenware jars, or _pithoi_, that were used for storing corn and

wine. The following illustration gives a graphic description of them

as they appeared _in situ_: ‘One of the compartments of the uppermost

houses below the Temple of Athené, and belonging to the third, the

burnt city, appears to have been used as a magazine for storing corn

or wine, for there are in it nine enormous earthenware jars of various

forms, about 5 ft. high and 4-3/4 ft. across, their mouths being from

29-1/2 in. to 35-1/4 in. broad. Each of them has four handles 3-3/4

in. broad, and the clay of which they are made is as much as 2-1/4 in.

thick.’[7]

Dr. Schliemann says [p. 279]: ‘The number of large jars which I brought

to light in the burnt stratum of the third city certainly exceeds

600. By far the larger number of them were empty, the mouth being

covered by a large flag of schist or limestone. This leads me to the

conclusion that the jars were filled with wine or water at the time

of the catastrophe, for there appears to have been hardly any reason

for covering them if they had been empty. Had they been used to contain

anything else but liquids, I should have found traces of the fact, but

only in a very few cases did I _find some carbonised grain_ in the

jars, and only twice a small quantity of a white mass, the nature of

which I could not determine.’

[Illustration: PITHOI FOUND AT HISSARLIK.]

So that we see that this pre-historic nation not only grew corn, but

stored it for future use.

The means this pre-historic people had of crushing or mealing the grain

was the same as usual: the saddle querns, or two stones with flat

surfaces, between which the grain was crushed and roughly triturated—so

frequently found on the Continent, and the pestle and mortar of the

lake dwellings, as also round stones for fitting into hollows such as

are found in the lakes, the cave dwellings of the Dordogne and in the

dolmens of France. Dr. Schliemann, in describing ‘the Trojan saddle

querns,’ says they ‘are either of trachyte or of basaltic lava, but

by far the larger number are of the former material. They are of oval

form, flat on one side and convex on the other, and resemble an egg

cut longitudinally through the middle. Their length is from 7 in. to

14 in., and even as much as 25 in.; the very long ones are generally

crooked longitudinally, their breadth is from 5 in. to 14 in. The grain

was bruised between the flat sides of two of these querns; but only

a kind of groats can have been produced in this way, not flour. The

bruised grain could not have been used for making bread. In _Homer_

we find it used for porridge (_Il._ xviii., 558-560), and also for

strewing on the roasted meat (_Od._ xiv., 76-77).’

In Homeric times the corn was evidently ground by millstones (which

were, probably, precisely similar to those found by Dr. Schliemann),

as we see in _Il._ vii. 270, xii., 161, and _Od._ vii., 104, xx.,

105. Pliny N.H., xxxvi., 30, speaking of millstones says: ‘In no

country are the molar stones superior to those of Italy; stones, be

it remembered, not fragments of rock; there are some provinces, too,

where they are not to be found at all. Some stones of this class are

softer than others, and admit of being smoothed with the whetstone, so

as to present all the appearance, at a distance, of serpentine. There

is no more durable stone than this; for, in general, stone, like wood,

suffers from the action, more or less, of rain, heat, and cold....

Some persons give this molar stone the name of _pyrites_, from the

circumstance that it has a great affinity to fire.’

[Illustration: POUNDING GRAIN.]

In book xviii., 23, Pliny gives us _the mode of grinding corn_. ‘All

the grains are not easily broken. In Etruria they first parch the

spelt in the ear, and then pound it with a pestle shod with iron at

the end. In this instrument the iron is notched at the bottom, sharp

ridges running out like the edge of a knife, and concentrating in

the form of a star, so that, if care is not taken to hold the pestle

perpendicularly while pounding, the grains will only be splintered and

the iron teeth broken. Throughout the greater part of Italy, however,

they employ a pestle that is only rough at the end, and wheels turned

by water, by means of which the corn is gradually ground. I shall here

set forth the opinions given by Mago as to the best method of pounding

corn. He says that the wheat should be steeped first of all in water,

and then cleaned from the husk, after which it should be dried in the

sun and then pounded with the pestle; the same plan, he says, should be

adopted in the preparation of barley.’

This was how corn was prepared in some parts of Italy at the time of

the Christian era, by the same method as that described by Livingstone:

‘The corn is pounded in a large wooden mortar, like the ancient

Egyptian one, with a pestle six feet long and about four inches thick.

The pounding is performed by two or even three women at one mortar.

Each, before delivering a blow with her pestle, gives an upward jerk

of the body, so as to put strength into the stroke, and they keep

exact time, so that two pestles are never in the mortar at the same

moment.... By the operation of pounding, with the aid of a little

water, the hard outside scale or husk of the grain is removed, and the

corn is made fit for the millstone. The meal irritates the stomach

unless cleared from the husk; without considerable energy in the

operation the husk sticks fast to the corn. Solomon thought that still

more vigour than is required to separate the hard husk or bran from

the wheat would fail to separate “a fool from his folly.” “Though thou

shouldest bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle, yet will

not his foolishness depart from him.”’

[Illustration: A BAKEHOUSE AT POMPEII.]

We have noticed the primitive Homeric millstones and the Etruscan

pestles and mortars, but at the time of the Christian era things

molinary were somewhat more advanced. Doubtless in parts of the

country the hand mill or quern, called _Mola manuaria_, _versatilis_ or

_trusatilis_, was in use, and it was worked by slaves, who were sent to

the _pistorineum_ as a punishment. But the usual corn mill was worked

by animals, and was called _Mola iumentaria_ or _Mola asinaria_.

Both Greeks and Romans originally ground their flour and baked their

bread at home, and mills and bakeries have been found in several

private houses in Pompeii. One of these bakeries was attached to the

house of Sallust, on the south side, being divided from it only by

a narrow street. Its front is the main street, or Via Consularis,

leading from the gate of Herculaneum to the Forum. Entering by a small

vestibule, the visitor finds himself in a portico of ample dimensions,

considering the character of the house, being about 36 feet by 30

feet. At the end of the portico is an opening through which the

bake-house is entered, which is at the back of the house, and opens

into a smaller street, which, diverging from the main street at the

fountain by Pansa’s house, runs straight up to the city walls. The

work room of the mill and bakery is about 33 feet long by 26 feet. The

centre is occupied by four stone mills, and when it was uncovered, the

ironwork, though entirely rust eaten, was yet perfect enough to explain

satisfactorily the method of construction.

Not only were the flour mills, kneading troughs and other utensils

for baking found in Pompeii, but there were also loaves of bread,

of round form, and sub-divided, some of which were stamped with the

baker’s name. That this was the usual form of loaf is also shown by a

painting on the walls of the Temple of Augustus, where we see the bread

partially broken, and by the representation of a baker’s shop, where

all the loaves are similarly shaped.

[Illustration: ROMAN METHODS OF BREAD-MAKING.]

[Illustration: A BAKER’S SHOP AT POMPEII.]

This, at all events, seems to have been the shape in vogue about the

time of the Christian era; but in the _bas reliefs_ on the tomb of

Eurysaces, who was a baker in a large way of business at Rome, they

seem to be globular. These _bas reliefs_ are most interesting, as they

show the whole history of baking. First there is the purchase of the

corn, and payment being made for it; then we see it ground, and sifted

to separate the bran. Next a man is buying some flour. Then we see the

dough being kneaded by horse-power, the bakers making it into loaves,

the baker with his peel baking the loaves, which are afterwards carried

in paniers to be weighed. Then there are the customers, and the bread

being sent out for delivery.

Pliny tells us that there were no bakers at Rome until the war with

King Perseus of Macedon, more than 580 years after the building of the

city. The ancient Romans used to make their own bread, it being an

occupation which belonged to the women, as we see is the case in many

nations even at the present day. In those times they had no cooks in

the number of their slaves, but used to hire them for the occasion from

the market. The Gauls were the first to employ the bolter that is made

of horse-hair; while the people of Spain made their sieves and meal

dressers of flax, and the Egyptians of papyrus and rushes.

Many freedmen were engaged as bakers, and under the Republic it was

one of the duties of the œdiles to see that the bread was properly

prepared and correct in weight. Grain was delivered into public

granaries by enrolled _Saccarii_, and it was distributed to the bakers

by a corporation called the _Catabolenses_. A bakers’ guild (_corpus_

or _collegium pistorum_), which long existed, was organised by Trajan,

and this body, through its connection with the _cura amonæ_, became of

much importance, and enjoyed various privileges. There were guilds of

_pistores_ and _clibanarii_ at Pompeii. A great increase in the number

of bakeries (_pistrinæ_, _officinæ pistoriæ_) afterwards took place at

Rome, owing, probably, to the action of Aurelian in introducing a daily

distribution of bread, instead of the old monthly distribution of grain

that had been usual since the time of Gracchi.

The History of Bread: From Pre-historic to Modern Times · 第 4 / 15 章