CHAPTER IV

ROMAN WOMEN AND ROMAN MARRIAGES

=47. Honorable Status of Roman Women.=--Calvus is the lordly senator

when his litter swings him down to the Curia by the Old Forum to

participate in what is still the most venerable council in the world,

but in his own house his authority is divided. He is not even sure that

one-half the power is really his. In all private matters his sway is

shared by his spouse Gratia.

Many are the evils inflicting Imperial Rome, but oppression of women is

not one of them. By the age of Hadrian it has long since come to pass

what Cato the Elder sadly predicted three centuries earlier, when Roman

women were learning the way to freedom: “On the day that women are our

equals, they will be our masters.”

Roman women are, indeed, excluded from seats in the Senate and from

the long-defunct right to vote in the public assemblies.[25] They

cannot command armies nor receive governorships, although every now

and then an angry senator vainly proposes a resolution that governors

shall not take their wives along with them to their provinces, lest the

latter constitute themselves the real rulers of the district. Women do

not act as judges or jurors. Nay more: legally they are under legal

disabilities calculated to stir the rage of their “equal suffrage”

sisters of a later day. They have always the status of minors, and are

subject to the legal control of either father, guardian, or husband to

their dying hour.

All this is true, yet, what of it? The jurists have long ago devised

fictions of the law whereby the women have practically as complete

control of their property as have their brothers; and the government

of the Empire is peculiarly a government of backstairs intrigues and

of secret influence. What chance have mere men against women in such

warfare? Custom also assigns to women an amount of freedom in most

social matters which makes Imperial Rome a feminine paradise that can

only be matched by Twentieth Century America.

=48. Men Reluctant to Marry.=--Long since leaders of the bolder

sex have had to reason with their fellow citizens on the necessity

of marriage as a patriotic duty. The pragmatic old censor Quintus

Metellus in 102 B.C. delivered a kind of a lay sermon: “If we could

get along without wives, fellow citizens (_Quirites_) we should all

spare ourselves the _tedium_ of marriage, but nature has ordained that

we can neither live pleasantly with wives, nor exist at all without

them--therefore let us sacrifice our personal interests to those of

society.” After him Emperor Augustus enacted stiff laws to decrease the

alarming number of bachelors, and to give special privileges to the

parents of three children. This does not prevent many prominent Romans

from looking upon a wife as a kind of expensive bondage often to be

shunned altogether.

=49. Rights and Privileges of Married Women.=--The great majority

of all Romans are married. Even the slaves are allowed to join in a

kind of unofficial wedlock known as _contubernium_, which only a

very harsh master will dissolve. As for the free married women they

go everywhere and do almost everything. No husband’s permission is

needed when they visit the Forum or theater. They can sue and be sued

or give testimony in the courts without his intervention. They manage

their own property. Gratia, for example, is well off in her own right.

Her estates are in charge of a dapper young freedman Ephorus, who is

incessantly visiting her, and who never dreams of taking orders from

her husband. So long as Gratia is barely faithful to Calvus he has no

right to complain. He thanks his “Good Genius,” therefore, that things

are not as in his friend Probus’s house, where the mistress’s factotum

is suspected of being on altogether too familiar terms with his fair

employer.

[Illustration: A ROMAN MATRON.]

Nevertheless, this freedom is supposed to carry with it corresponding

responsibilities. Every Roman woman theoretically is responsible for

her husband’s good name and for the wise ordering of his family. No

right-minded woman dismisses the hope that at the end they will put

the great words on her tombstone: “_She counselled well. She managed

well. She spun wool._”

The control of the vast _familia_ of slaves is usually in a matron’s

hands, a duty calculated to bring out every executive quality within

her. She largely conducts the education of her sons, no less than

of her daughters. No Roman is ashamed to admit (as an Athenian in

Pericles’s day might have been ashamed) that in the great crises

of life he took the authoritative advice of his mother.[26] Roman

civilization is, therefore, for better or worse, a civilization to

which women no less than men have been suffered to apply the full

powers of their genius. _It is a “hundred per cent civilization”_;

whereas, that of Athens, considering the manner in which Athenian women

were confined and ignored, was hardly more than a “fifty per cent

civilization.”

=50. Selection of Husbands for Young Girls.=--It is a fact, however,

that in one great and vital matter Roman women are not free agents.

They usually have their husbands, at least their first husbands, chosen

for them by their parents. This comes to pass largely because usage

requires that girls should be married so young that no rational romance

on their part is really possible.

Custom amounting to law requires that a girl shall be at least twelve,

and a boy fourteen before marriage. In the case of girls this minimum

is often adhered to pretty closely, but betrothals can be arranged

still earlier. Cicero’s daughter Tullia was betrothed at ten and

married at thirteen--a very common arrangement. Nobody imagined she had

the least right to complain. Marriage involves a great shift in family

relations, and the control of the family pertains strictly to the

_pater familias_ and to his _matrona_. They will ordinarily exercise

loving pains in selecting a suitable spouse for a daughter, but the

decision must be very largely theirs.

Boys as a rule marry much later, often not until well into manhood.

They can demand inevitably a certain right of choice, although the

parents still exercise a marked authority. As for bachelors, if they

indulge in various coarse “affairs” with dancing girls, only very

peevish persons are critical. After marriage, however, they must treat

their wives with reasonable outward respect, if by no means always

with austere faithfulness. In any case a girl is likely to be married

off too young either to resist her parents’ choice or to pick out

intelligently any proper husband for herself.[27]

=51. A Marriage Treaty among Noble-Folk.=--When Gratia’s parents

decided she was old enough to “become settled” they applied to a

distinguished kinsman, an ex-consul, to help them to find a suitable

bridegroom. This noble gentleman looked over a list of his younger

friends, selected Calvus, and wrote a careful letter commending him,

praising his lineage, and his firm hopes of official distinction,

and telling how “he had a frank, open countenance, fresh colored and

blooming and a handsome well-knit figure”; in short “he was quite

the fellow to deserve so fine a girl.” The great man went on to add

that the favored candidate had a respectable fortune, for “though I

dislike to speak of the financial aspects of the matter, still one must

consider the tendencies of the day.” Not one word was said as to how

Gratia herself might want to be consulted; her consent was taken for

granted.[28]

Gratia’s parents, therefore, approached Calvus’s guardian, his uncle.

He being satisfied as to dowry and social adjustments, both young

people were informed of what had been determined for them. Gratia

and Calvus alike had always expected some such arrangement and

capitulated with reasonable grace. The ensuing marriage, founded not

on any romance, but on a cold-blooded study of what supposedly made

for domestic happiness, in this case at least has been fortunate and

fruitful. The wedded pair have come truly to love one another, and they

dwell in great harmony. In this general manner marriages are arranged

every day in Rome.

Of course these are first marriages. Let Gratia become a widow, or let

her imitate so many of her friends and divorce her husband, and her

second spouse will ordinarily be of quite her own choosing; and Calvus,

of course, in selecting again, would be completely his own master.

=52. A Betrothal in Wealthy Circles.=--Gratia’s daughter Junia

is only ten, yet her parents are already beginning to think about

betrothals; but only a block up the street there has just been the

excitement of an actual wedding. Aulus Statilius Pomponius is only an

eques, but the gods have blessed him with a hundred million sesterces

($4,000,000). He and his wife have a daughter who will inherit vast

possessions, and wealth is a splendid substitute for lineage. They have

found a young Gaius Ulpius Pollio, already in the Senate, who claims a

distant cousinship to the Emperor himself. Pollio is none too wealthy

and is already a widower, but Statilia and her mother are infinitely

delighted at an alliance with the edges of an imperial house. Nothing

has lacked, therefore, for an ultra-fashionable wedding, the talk of

the entire capital.

First came the betrothal, a great social concourse in Pomponius’s

atrium, a throng of equites and senators with their wives, jewels

flashing, countless tongues gossiping, with Statilia led in by her

father to the center of the circle to meet the bridegroom-to-be.

Statilia said not a word through the entire proceedings. All Pollio’s

dealings were with her father, and in clear voice the two men exchanged

the legal formulas: “Do you promise to give your daughter, Statilia to

me, to be my wedded wife?” said the younger man.

“The gods bring luck! I betroth her.”

“The gods bring luck!”

After that technically Statilia became a bride-elect; she was a

_sponsa_. Either side had legally the right still to break the

agreement, but it was socially ruinous to do so. Pollio presented

Statilia with various valuable toilet articles, and especially with a

ring to be worn on the third finger of the left hand, because everybody

said that “a nerve ran directly from this particular finger to the

heart.” It was the engagement ring of a later age almost precisely.

=53. Adjusting the Dowry.=--Then followed weeks of frantic

preparation: the women busy with the things which always have

made women busy over weddings long before the days of Romulus and

Remus; Pomponius and Pollio with wrestling over the very nice legal

adjustments of Statilia’s dowry. How much would the old eques give

in all, in cash, land, and banker’s securities? How much for his

daughter’s special use? How much as _dos_, the funds which the

new son-in-law could touch? How could the property be arranged so that

if the marriage ended presently in a divorce (as spiteful wagers were

already being laid that it might) the _dos_ could be given back to

Statilia without grievous loss of principal?

At one time the betrothal almost had to be cancelled, such extreme

shrewdness was shown on both sides. But finally the matter was

adjusted. Three noble friends for either side pressed their seal rings

in witness to the contracts. The day came for the wedding.

=64. Dressing the Bride.=--Family exigencies required a springtime

wedding, when there were a great many unlucky days to be avoided;

but an expert Etruscan haruspex at length found a day that satisfied

Statilia and her parents’ scruples. On the night before the great event

she laid all her playthings, her childish amulet (_bulla_), and her

childish garments on the altar of the paternal Lares whose protection

she was quitting forever. Then she went to bed in a _tunica recta_,

a fine, yellow garment woven in one piece, supposedly an article of

extremely good omen.

The next day the bride was dressed personally by her mother with

unusual care. However expensive her ornaments she had to wear this

same one-piece tunic next to her skin, the gown being held around the

waist by a band of wool tied with a complicated “knot of Hercules.”

She wore, of course, all the jewels loaded upon neck, ears, arms, and

fingers which by the contract she was to bring Pollio in her trousseau.

Her long hair had been parted according to ancient custom by a spear

into six locks, braided now with ribbons weighted down with pearls.

Her shoes were of finest white leather covered with more pearls. Over

her head streamed a long, gauzy flame-colored veil of silk--worth

very literally more than its weight in gold.[29] Pressing down this

bridal veil was a garland of flowers picked, as custom required, by the

bride’s own hand, and interspersed with sprigs of the sacred “verbena”

herbs. Pollio, when he presented himself, was in the best gala costume

of a senator, but there were no special “wedding garments” for the

bridegroom, corresponding to the bridal veil.

=55. The Marriage Ceremonies.=--The afternoon was at hand, and the

insulæ in neighboring quarters emptied their plebeian throngs to gaze

at the gilded litters which went swinging up to the house of Pomponius,

the armies of scarlet-clad running footmen, the pompous freedmen

marching beside their patron’s sedans, the bravery of purple robes,

the flash of gold and of jewels. Of course, the atrium had been hung

with garlands. The air inside was heavy with the perfumes of flowers,

of costly unguents, and of the finest Arabian incense, while the noble

guests elbowed and pushed one another to get near the altar near the

tablinum and win the best sight of the happy pair.

Roman marriages are pretty strictly civil ceremonies. There is no legal

requirement for any religious rites. Hardly anybody now is married

according to the stale old formula of the _confarreatio_, when the

betrothed couple became wedded by eating a cake which had just been

consecrated by the Pontifex Maximus. A much simpler form is now used,

but before the ceremony there always has to be the sacrifice.

Amid a decently pious hush a sheep is led to the side of the water tank

(_impluvium_) in the atrium; the shrewd-eyed old haruspex, trailing his

long robe and muttering jargon that passes for Etruscan, is aided by

two skillful assistants in killing the creature promptly and avoiding

disgusting gore; then in ripping open its belly and examining with

expert eye the still quivering entrails. (See p. 429.) It is proper now

for Statilia to turn pale and clutch the arm of her mother. What if the

signs were unfavorable? “Whoever heard of bad omens being discovered

at a great wedding?” cynically whispers a senator. “_Bene_--good!”

announces the haruspex with a leer. “_Bene! Bene!_” echo all the

guests. The soothsayer retires. The wedding can proceed.

The final ceremony is very simple. First the tablets of the marriage

contract and the transfer of the dowry are produced, read, and, if not

already witnessed, are signed by the proper attestors. Then a young

matron-of-honor, Statilia’s _pronuba_, leads the bride up to Pollio.

She thrusts out her hand from under her great veil and takes the hand

of her husband-elect. Everybody listens while he, and not any priest

or official for him, puts the direct question: “Will you be my _mater

familias_?” “Yes,” answers Statilia, perhaps a little too readily; and

then she asks him openly: “And will you be my _pater familias_?” “Yes,”

and immediately there is a general shout of congratulation.

These decisive words once spoken, Pollio, his bride, and her parents

unite in placing a cake of coarse bread upon the altar, uttering brief

dedications of the food to Jupiter and Juno, and also to the quaint

rural gods Tellus, Picumnus, and Pilumnus who will bless the estates

of the new couple. The cakes are presented in a basket held by a

young boy, Statilia’s cousin, her _camillus_, both of whose parents

are required to be living. The company now redoubles its cry of “Good

luck! Good luck! _felicitas!_”--and everybody is assuredly in excellent

appetite for the ensuing wedding feast.

=56. The Wedding Procession.=--This is not the place for describing a

great banquet (see p. 113); it is enough here to state that Pomponius

is obliged to justify his wealth by a prodigal hospitality. Vain has

proved Augustus’s law limiting the cost of wedding feasts to one

thousand sesterces ($40). Such regulations win only laughter!

As the climax after the dainties comes the distribution of pieces of

the huge wedding-cake (_mustaceum_), made of fine meal steeped in

new wine and served upon bay leaves. By this time everybody has drunk

enough good Massic and Falernian to be excited and talkative, it has

become twilight in the street, and Pomponius’s chief freedman (the

master of ceremonies) gives the signal: “The procession!”

In the vestibule musters a squad of flute players and torch bearers.

As the music strikes up, good form requires Statilia to cast herself

into her mother’s arms and weep and scream violently. Good form

equally requires Pollio to tear her thence with playful violence--“a

remembrance,” people say, “of the Romans’ rape of the Sabines.”

Statilia promptly ceases struggling and submits cheerfully to being led

through the door.

The wedding procession is an indispensable part of the ceremony.

Probably if Pollio lives in another city, some family friend will

now loan his residence for “leading home the bride.” As it is, the

bridegroom fortunately possesses a handsome house about a mile distant

on the Quirinal. For all her wealth Statilia has to walk the entire

way.

First go the flute players bringing the crowds out of all the insulæ

when they cross the Subura; then long files of the younger guests of

both sexes, talking vivaciously, and flourishing white-thorn torches;

then the camillus and a youthful assistant bearing ostentatiously the

bride’s spindle and distaff, token of the household labors presumably

ahead of her; then the bride herself, led on either hand by a boy both

of whose parents are living, while a third of like good fortune carries

a special torch of honor. Pollio himself walks just behind the bride,

and is kept busy tossing walnuts to all the children in the crowd

in token of the fact that he has now (for the second time) put away

childish things. After them, with more flambeaux and in merry disorder,

taking pains to exhibit their fine robes and jewels, follow all the

older relatives and friends of both parties. The torchlight, the music,

the brave colors, and gems gleaming out of the darkness make the scene

bewitching. No wonder all the gaping crowds join in the marriage shouts

“Io Talasse!”[30] or in the oft-repeated “Felicitas!”

=57. At the Bridegroom’s House.=--The guests and many of the spectators

fail not also to raise the “Fescinne songs” proper for marriage

processions; old folk songs very coarse, and interspersed with

extremely broad quips and personalities. At last the house of Pollio is

reached. It is a blaze of light from vestibule to garden, and all the

_decuriæ_ (squads of ten) of slaves are mustered to greet their new

_domina_.

At the entrance Statilia stops to wind the door pillars with bits of

wool, and to touch the door itself with oil and fat, the emblems of

plenty. She is then promptly _lifted_ over the threshold to avoid

an ill-omened stumble, and is immediately confronted by her husband who

has slipped in before her and who now presents her with a cup of water

and a glowing fire brand, token that she is entitled to the protection

of his family Lares. Statilia accepts these and in clear voice repeats

the very ancient and famous marriage formula, “Where thou art Gaius, I

am Gaia” (_Ubi tu Gaius, ego Gaia_).

The invited guests now sweep inside and there is more elbowing while

Statilia produces three silver coins; one of these she gives to her

husband as emblem of her dowry; one she lays on the altar for the

Lares of her new home; one she casts back into the street, a gift to

the “Lares of the Highway” who guarded the door. Then her marriage

torch is blown out, and tossed away to be scrambled for as emblem of

supreme good luck by all the younger guests. The matron of honor has

already arranged the luxurious marriage chamber, and the happy pair

are led inside and the door shut upon them, while all their friends

join in the rollicking “nuptial song” just outside the portal. There

is nothing left now for the guests to do but to go home; all being

invited, however, to return to Pollio’s house the next day to join in

a second great feast, with Statilia this time presiding as mistress of

the establishment.

=58. Honors and Liberties of a Matron.=--Before her marriage Statilia

had been a mere girl, completely controlled by her parents, unable to

appear in public save under severe restrictions, and apparently with

hardly a will of her own. The day after entering Pollio’s house she

finds herself become by one act a noble _matrona_, with the destinies

of a huge retinue of slaves and freedmen at her disposal, enjoying a

great property, meeting her husband’s friends as their equal, going

where she pleases, saying what she pleases, almost (within wide limits)

doing what she pleases.

Abroad in crowds, her dress, the _stola matronalis_, secures

the young married woman extreme respect. Every March, she, with

all the other honorable wives in Rome, enjoys the honors of the

_matronalia_, an official festival, kind of “Mother’s day” devoted

to celebrating the virtues of the gracious heads of each household.

On this day no less than on her birthday, she receives presents from

her husband, her family, and all her dependents. Finally, being a

Senator’s wife, when she comes to die, she probably will be entitled

to a great state funeral, with a formal eulogy in the Forum as if she

were a public personage. No wonder that Roman girls yearn eagerly for

marriage! It is their astonishing emancipation.

=59. Unhappy Marriages and Frivolous Women.=--Will a fashionable

alliance like that of Statilia and Pollio turn out happily? There

are scoffers even among the friends who bore the torches. Nobody

expects Pollio (a gay young aristocrat) to prove an example of austere

faithfulness, although he must never do anything to insult his wife

publicly. As for Statilia the cynics about the fair sex are very many.

Long ago Ovid has written, “Every woman may be won if only she’s

rightly tempted.” If a young wife is light-minded, she has plenty

of opportunities to acquire lovers, and at the great festivals and

banquets, at the theaters, gladiator fights, and circuses women have

every chance to meet intriguing men without interference by their

husbands.

The very fact that as unmarried girls Roman matrons were denied

all chance for lawful romances, now makes devious love affairs

seem all the more racy. Any number of fine ladies have indulged in

unwise “friendships” with dissolute actors, public dancers, or even

gladiators. In many a mansion there is a handsome freedman or even a

slave who can become extraordinarily familiar with his mistress. There

are said to be coarse-grained mothers who actually teach their married

daughters how to push intrigues and to smuggle in or out love-letters

under the very noses of their husbands; and there are plenty of young

men, rich, “noble,” and very idle, who spend their time philandering

with married ladies.

With every deduction and allowance for scandal the number of such

unsteady women is very great. “What snakes are driving you mad,” cried

Juvenal, “that you think of taking a wife? Why not leap from a high

window or from the Æmilian bridge rather than submit to a she-tyrant?”

However, even if women lead lives that are outwardly respectable, there

are plenty of minor charges against Roman ladies. Some are utterly

extravagant; haunting the fine shops along the Via Lata and running

up ruinous bills. Some are laughed at for taking up music, poetry, or

Greek antiquities as shallow fads and “chattering in a mixture of Latin

and Greek, and making their tongues go incessantly like a gong.” Some

are said to take fencing lessons and to waste their days practicing

on a dummy antagonist with a foil, and learning to handle a shield

as if intending to join the army. Others are never happy unless they

know all the latest news: “What the Thracians and the Seres (Chinese)

are doing”; “Who has just married a notorious widow”; “Whether a

comet threatens the King of Parthia.” Others are utterly selfish and

heartless; they will weep at the loss of a pet sparrow, but treat their

slave girls with hideous brutality, and “let a husband die to save a

lap-dog’s life.” Worst of all are certain women actually suspected of

giving their unloved husbands a dose of poison when various reasons

make a divorce inconvenient.

=60. Divorces, Easy and Frequent.=--However, divorce is the regular

outcome of very many unlucky marriages. Every Roman girl, when her

parents tell her “We have chosen for you--”; knows in the back of her

mind: “Marriage will give me freedom. If this wedlock isn’t a success,

my next husband will probably be my own choosing.”

The first divorce mentioned in Roman history was in 231 B.C. when a

certain Ruga put away a truly beloved wife, out of a high sense of

public duty--because she bore him no children. The public was shocked

at such action then, but soon it was shocked no longer. Under the later

Republic lucky was the nobleman or noblewoman who was not divorced at

least once. Cicero divorced Terentia after a long wedded life seemingly

because he wanted a new marriage portion; Cato the Younger (immaculate

Stoic) repudiated his wife to please a friend, then calmly took her

back again at the friend’s death.

Under the Empire things hardly seem to have become any better. “Trial

marriages” are not a recognized institution; but surely they exist. It

is direfully easy for either a man or woman to take the initiative.

No court proceedings are necessary. “Take away your property!” spoken

formally and before witnesses is sufficient to break up the household,

although the more usual method is to “_send a messenger_”; _i.e._

dispatch a delegation of friends to the other party to break the news.

Vainly did Augustus try by legislation to make divorces less prompt and

convenient. The whole proceeding is still grievously popular and simple.

Of course, divorced persons are under no stigma in the fashionable set.

Many a time a couple has separated, married elsewhere, separated again,

and then resumed the old wedlock. Women are charged with “flitting

from one home to another, wearing out the bridal veil”; and indeed,

spicy instances are cited of ladies who boasted “eight husbands in

five autumns, a fact worthy of commemoration on their tombs”; or of

reckoning the years not by the annual consuls but by their annual

husbands.

=61. Celibacy Common: Old Families Dying Out.=--Under such conditions

what wonder many a rich Roman prefers celibacy! They often proclaim the

“advantages of childlessness.” Old men of property without children

are fawned upon with offers of every kind of service. Social and even

public honors are thrust upon them. Their atria are crowded every

morning with genteel visitors; their least wishes anticipated--all in

the desperate hopes that “when their tablets are opened” they will have

remembered the swarm of lackeys in their wills. Indeed, adventurers

have been known to go far in Rome by making a false show of wealth,

concealing the fact they actually have children, and “seeming bilious

and complaining of indigestion.” Everybody apparently will give them

favor or credit. It is a familiar scandal.

Under such circumstances what wonder most of the old Republican

families have died out by the age of Hadrian, that the Calvi feel very

isolated; and that of the strictly patrician families only the famous

Cornelii appear now to survive.

=62. Nobler Types of Women.=--But do the above stories represent

the true moral condition of most women in Rome? Certainly not, or

society could not exist. In the first place such women represent the

rotten crust of the nobility; the ordinary equestrian and middle-class

women are still relatively modest and moral, efficient managers, good

mothers, and, if they are poor, hard workers. In the second place, even

among the upper Senatorial nobility, there are plenty of matronæ of the

very best type; true props to their husbands, wise mothers to their

children, kindly mistresses to their slaves. Gratia has many friends

whose households are schools of virtue, and many a Roman, from the

Imperial Augustus down, has confessed that his wife has been his tower

of strength.

=63. Famous and Devoted Wives.=--People still talk of the famous Arria,

wife of Cæcina Pætus, who, when the Emperor Claudius ordered him to

commit suicide, and he could hardly pluck up courage for a manly exit

from life, as an example plunged the dagger in her own breast, then

held it out to her husband, saying, “Pætus, it doesn’t hurt me.”

Her own daughter, the younger Arria, and Fannia, the wife of the

philosopher Helvidius Priscus, grossly murdered by Nero, won hardly

less reputations for fortitude. Pliny the Younger has recorded a more

humbly born Italian dame, who, when her husband was suffering from

incurable ulcers, but lacking the hardihood to kill himself alone, tied

herself to him and with him jumped into the lake at Larium so that both

were drowned.

[Illustration: WEDDED PAIR WITH CAMILLUS (Boy

Attendant).]

Fortunately the days of tyrannous emperors seem long since over. Wives

usually can show their virtue by living for their husbands and not by

dying with them. Rather lately there passed away an old man, Domitius

Tullus. Vast was his wealth but it brought him no pleasure; he was so

crippled and racked in every limb “that he could only enjoy his great

riches by looking at them. He was so helpless that he had to get others

to clean and wash his teeth.” He had a young and a very pretty wife;

but so far from neglecting him or trying to hasten his end, she kept

him alive for years by extraordinarily faithful personal care. Lately,

too, the venerable Senator Macrinus has lost his wife, “who if she had

lived in the good old days would have been counted an exemplary woman.

They lived together for thirty-nine years, with never a single quarrel

or disagreement.”[31]

[Illustration: SEATED NOBLEWOMAN.]

These are simply random cases. Of course, many people know the tribute

Pliny the Younger paid to his own wife Calpurnia, much younger than

himself but absolutely devoted to her husband: “She has a keen

intelligence, she is wonderfully economical, and she loves me.” He went

on to add that she read all his literary effusions most carefully,

sat behind a curtain to listen when he gave public recitations before

a male audience, and that when he had to argue in court had relays

of runners to keep her informed as to how well he was impressing the

judges. When the twain were separated she “would embrace his letters as

though they were himself,” while he (if he got no new letters from her)

“would read over her old letters and take them up again and again as

though they were new ones.”

=64. The Story of Turia.=--One day when Gratia had caught young

Junia overhearing a very uncanny story of a rich old lady who kept a

whole troupe of profligate actors for her own private amusement, she

took her out upon the magnificent avenue of stately tombs along the

Appian Way to visit the memorial to a venerated ancestress,--a certain

Turia who had lived in the troubled days of the Second Triumvirate,

and who by her rare courage, fortitude, and intelligence had saved her

husband the noble Vespillo from disgrace and death.

Turia’s husband in a long inscription recited how she had saved his

life in the Civil Wars at sore peril to her own, and how she had lived

with him afterward in perfect affection and harmony, although, being

childless, such was her devotion to him that she actually offered

to let Vespillo divorce her that he might have children by a second

marriage, promising very literally “to be a sister” to his new wife.

But her husband repudiated the strange idea with anger: “That you

should have ever thought it possible we could be separated save by

death was most horrible to me. The one sorrow that was in store for me

was that I was destined to survive you.”

And thus the tablet concluded: “You were a faithful and obedient wife;

you were kind and gracious, sociable and friendly; you were assiduous

in your spinning; you followed our family and national religious rites

and admitted no foreign superstitions; you did not dress conspicuously,

nor make any kind of household display. Your management of our house

was exemplary; you tended my mother as carefully as if she had been

your own. You had innumerable other excellencies, common to the best

type of matrons, but these I mention are peculiarly your own.”[32]

Turia has been dead over a hundred years, but there are still high-born

women in Rome who are her equals. One of them, Calvilla, has a fine

young son now about thirteen, who owes an infinite debt to his mother,

and whom the Emperor will presently select as the heir presumptive to

the throne. History will call him Marcus Aurelius.

A day in old Rome · 第 4 / 23 章