In the "Transfiguration on Mount Tabor" the figure of the ascending

Christ with outstretched arms and noble features is one of Fra

Angelico's best works, but the attitudes of the Apostles are

conventional; the kneeling figure on the left with hands upraised to

express confusion and surprise at the resurrection, is too mannered,

and by its pose and action disturbs the serene harmony of the picture.

[Illustration: THE INSTITUTION OF THE HOLY SACRAMENT.]

[Illustration: THE PRESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE.]

In the "Institution of the Holy Sacrament," Fra Angelico, in true

Giottesque style, represented the Apostles at the mystic feast, and

Christ giving them the consecrated wafer, while He holds the chalice

in His left hand. Here the figures of the disciples admirably express

varied feelings of devotion and joy in receiving the divine food from

the hand of the Master. But the fresco which surpasses all, in

nobility of line and simple grandeur of conception, is the "Coronation

of the Virgin." Christ and the Virgin are seated in glory above the

light clouds, the Son places the celestial crown on the head of the

Mother who humbly bows her whole form towards Him, with hands crossed

on her bosom. Her face is irradiated by an ineffable and heavenly

smile, the supreme expression of happiness; the drapery of both is

white and delicate, enveloping the limbs with well defined folds. The

figures without being ineffectual, indeed they are even forcible, yet

appear aerial apparitions, and veritable visions of divinity. Six

saints in ecstasy assist at the triumph, St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Paul,

St. Dominic, St. Francis, St. Peter Martyr and St. Benedict, three on

the right and three on the left, in a semicircular composition, all in

attitudes of contemplative ecstasy.

[Illustration: CORONATION OF THE VIRGIN.]

[Illustration: THE PRAYER IN THE GARDEN.]

The frescoes of the Maries at the Sepulchre, may also be considered

one of our artist's masterpieces. The risen Christ emerges to half

His figure from the clouds which envelop Him, while the holy women

contemplate the empty sepulchre, and the angel seated in it points out

the miracle which has happened. Other scenes worthy of notice are the

"Presentation in the Temple," "Christ in Hades," and the "Buffeting of

the Saviour," and "The Prayer in the Garden."

[Illustration: ADORATION OF THE MAGI.]

[Illustration: THE CRUCIFIXION.]

In one of the last cells, the "Crucifixion" is reproduced in a new

manner, which represents Christ having ascended the ladder and

offering Himself to death: His Mother faints at his feet in the arms

of Mary Magdalene. Marchese asserts that this composition was inspired

by a legend of St. Mary Magdalene in the language of the 14th century.

"And I thought that Messer Gesù, ascended the cross by a ladder

voluntarily, offering His hands and feet. A centurion who was

afterwards saved saw the deed, and like a wise man he said within

himself, oh, what a marvel is here! that this prophet appears to

willingly place himself on the Cross, neither murmuring nor resisting!

And while he stood admiring, Messer Gesù had ascended sufficiently

high, and turning on the ladder opened His kingly arms, and extended

His hands to those who were waiting to nail them."[46]

[Illustration: THE VIRGIN ENTHRONED AMIDST SAINTS.]

Lastly in the room which Cosimo de' Medici had prepared for his own

use in the convent and where he often talked with the Prior Fra

Antonino, Fra Angelico painted an "Adoration of the Magi." As Pope

Eugene IV. slept in this room when he came to Florence in 1442 to

assist at the consecration of the church, it is probable that this

Adoration allusive to the Epiphany, at which time the consecration

took place, was painted at that epoch.

The fresco, rich in figures and beauty, is executed with real

mastery. The personages of the royal cortège vary in type and

character, in expression and sentiment, showing the great pains our

artist had taken in the painting of this important work, which now,

unhappily restored and injured, only allows us to guess at the

wonderful beauty with which it was once filled.

We see his own hand more completely in the fresco in the corridor

representing the Virgin enthroned, with the child seated on her knee

and several saints at the sides. On the right are St. Paul, St. Thomas

Aquinas, St. Laurence, and St. Peter Martyr; on the left St. Mark, St.

Cosmo and St. Damian, and St. Dominic, holding an open book where it

is written: _Caritatem habete; humilitatem servate; paupertatem

voluntariam possidete. Maledictionem Dei et meam imprecor possessiones

inducenti in meo Ordine_.

This painting, one of the most perfect in the convent, is one of

Angelico's best, and shows what a high degree of ability he had

reached. The gentle head of the Virgin bends down to look at her Son

with the golden curls, whose face with sparkling eyes breathes an

infantile grace. The execution is accurate, the figures well designed,

full of character, nobility and life; the delicacy of tone, just

balance of composition and freshness of colouring, are mingled with

the most profound sentiment and intimate knowledge of truth.

Rio thinks this fresco was done while Fra Angelico was in Tuscany

after 1450; his adieu, as it were, to his brethren; a last legacy to

that devout household with whom he had shared joys and sorrows, and

from which he was about to be separated. There is nothing to refute

this; but it appears to us that he who had painted the great

Crucifixion of the chapter-house might well have done at the same time

this fresco. It is a compendium of all his technical qualities and

feeling, and demonstrates how little by little he succeeded, while

still preserving his own spirit, in reaching the real in art, and

giving it life in a manner all his own. But in comparing the pictures

of the chapel of Pope Nicholas V. in Rome, with this fresco, we cannot

avoid noticing in those a greater freedom of composition and grouping

of the figures, a greater majesty of design, a truth and depth of

observation, not recognisable in any of his earlier works, nor even in

the large Crucifixion, which is justly considered one of the pious

monk's best works.

[Illustration]

IN THE GALLERY

OF ANCIENT AND MODERN ART.

[Illustration: ANCIENT AND MODERN GALLERY--FLORENCE THE DESCENT FROM

THE CROSS.]

[Illustration]

The enthusiasm aroused by Fra Angelico's pictures, caused a vivid

desire amongst the various religious orders of the city, to possess

some work of his; Dominicans, Vallombrosians, Chartreuse monks, and

the Camaldolese of Santa Maria degli Angeli, vied with each other, and

all in turn obtained some of his admirable creations.

Among the panels painted by Fra Giovanni for the Florentine churches

and convents, the one which excels all for intensity of sentiment and

sincerity of expression is the "Deposition from the Cross," once in

the Sacristy of Santa Trinità, and now in the Ancient and Modern

Gallery, a panel "in which," writes Vasari, "he put so much care that

we may class it among the best things he ever did."

The disciples with loving reverence let down from the Cross, which

occupies the centre of the composition, the body of the Saviour. His

face, drooping on the left shoulder, breathes a sorrowful calm, and

divine serenity which death itself could not destroy. The nude is

intelligently rendered, in nobility of form, softness of line, and

transparency and morbidity of colouring. On the left stands a group of

women; St. Mary Magdalene kisses the feet of Christ; the Virgin

contemplates Him in a trance of sadness; on the right the disciples

discuss the melancholy drama among themselves, while below, a

kneeling saint holds his right hand to his breast and extends the left

in a sorrowful wonder. In the background is a hilly landscape with the

Holy City on the left, and Mount Calvary which the artist "with poetic

and devout conceit," writes Marchese, "has drawn adorned with grass

and flowers, as though to denote that at the touch of the feet and

precious blood of Jesus Christ, the bare heights were reclad in rich

and verdant beauty. Although marred by restoration--for the eye is

offended by the inharmonious contrast of tints, the effect of

unskilful retouching,--we may consider this painting as one of the

most beautiful works which Fra Angelico has left us. Grandeur and

simplicity are marvellously blended with freshness of colour, and

correctness of design with most intense expression and pure sentiment."

The landscape in the background shows the usual defects of

perspective, but the mountains shade off delicately against the

distant blue of the sky, the plain is illuminated with infinite

flowerets, and a rich verdure clothes the summit of the sacred hill.

In the pilasters of the frame are small figures of Saints, some of the

best and finest that Fra Angelico ever painted, and in the gables

above the three arches Lorenzo Monaco has represented the "Noli me

tangere," the "Resurrection," and the "Maries at the Sepulchre."

Here the question naturally arises: Why should Lorenzo Monaco have

limited his work solely to the three little scenes in the gables of

the frame, while Fra Angelico has given us the beautiful little

figures of the pilasters which show all his peculiar grace and

refinement? Why did an artist capable of producing those admirable

saints, leave to Fra Lorenzo Monaco the office (all the worse if he

had been, as some say, his master) of finishing the work with only

those three insignificant little scenes? And can we suppose that Fra

Lorenzo Monaco, already at the apex of his fame, should accept, and,

still more strange, be content with a secondary part in Fra Giovanni's

work?

The answer is more simple than it at first appears. There is no doubt

that the scenes in the Gothic gables are the work of the Camaldolese

monk, and as we cannot logically infer that they were specially

painted by him for Fra Angelico's picture, we must suppose, and indeed

firmly believe them to have been added at a later time. In fact, the

form of the foliated Gothic decoration lacks character and does not

harmonize with the pilasters which clearly show, too, a subsequent

adaptation of the frame. The finials of the pilasters do not match the

style of the gables, in fact it is clear that the Gothic

ornamentation, taken from some painting by Lorenzo Monaco, was at a

more recent date adapted to Fra Angelico's altar-piece.

Fra Giovanni painted a panel picture of the "Dead Christ" for the

"Compagnia del Tempio" in Florence; this is now in the Ancient and

Modern Gallery, having been placed there in 1786, after the

suppression of that Company.

[Illustration: THE DEAD CHRIST.]

Rio supposes that the enthusiasm aroused by the great Deposition in

Santa Trinità, tempted the Company to covet the possession of a

similar one.[47]

Only two figures, however, are common to the two paintings: one is the

St. Simeon kneeling in the left corner who, in this second picture, is

represented as a younger man than in the first; the other is a figure

a little behind him, which is a reproduction of that one in the large

Deposition with a hood on his head, who is speaking to the disciple

below him, as he entrust to him the body of the Saviour;--a figure

which Milanesi believes to be a portrait of the architect Michelozzo.

If this be indeed Fra Angelico's friend the Florentine architect, we

may admit Cartier's assertion that this panel is a sequel of the

larger Descent from the Cross, and may have been painted at the same

time.[48] But these are things which we dare not affirm with any

certainty, as we entertain doubts regarding the greater or less

authenticity of writers on the subject of Michelozzo's portrait.

Besides many figures of saints, the painter has introduced those of

St. Dominic and the Beata Villana, because the Company of the Temple

had ancient rights over the relics of this good woman which are

preserved in the Dominican church of Santa Maria Novella. The other

figures, though expressing divers feelings of sorrow and lively

sympathy, have nothing in common with the famous Deposition either in

character or technique and the picture does not reach the usual

perfection.

Even the type of the Christ differs remarkably in the two paintings,

so much so that no comparison can be instituted, or resemblance found

between them; moreover, the panel of the Temple Company is badly

spoilt by restoration, and the colouring is so altered that it is

almost black in some parts.

"In the Chapel of the SS. Annunziata at Florence which Piero di Cosimo

de' Medici caused to be built, Fra Angelico painted the doors of the

presses where the silver plate is kept, with little figures executed

with great diligence."[49] They represent the life and death of Christ

in 35 small scenes, which are now in the Ancient and Modern Gallery.

Padre Marchese writes: "I believe it was in Fiesole that he painted

many of those little panels, which may now be seen in the Gallery of

the Florentine Academy of Design, and perhaps also the doors of the

presses for the silver vessels in the chapel of the SS. Annunziata at

Florence. In his first edition Vasari had enumerated them among his

early works, which may have seemed probable, as Fra Angelico's first

steps in art were in illuminating and painting small stories."[50]

But as it was only in 1448 that Piero de' Medici, to show his devotion

to the Virgin of the Annunciation, obtained from the monks the

patronage of that altar with the intention of adorning it with a

splendour worthy of the dignity of Her to whom it was dedicated,[51]

we cannot suppose that Fra Angelico painted the door of its treasure

presses before that time.

Rio also dates at the epoch of the monk's sojourn in Tuscany towards

1450, the great unfinished painting now in the Academy of the Belle

Arti, which has been regarded as one of Fra Angelico's first works. We

know as a fact that in 1450 he was prior of the convent at Fiesole,

and may believe that he stayed some time in Tuscany, before returning

to Rome to finish the chapel of Pope Nicholas V.[52] But Rio adds that

"besides the date of the building of the chapel, the fact that the

portrait of Michelozzo represents him as older in this work than in

the Deposition," suggests for this cyclic composition an approximative

date, very far from that assigned to it previously.[53]

We must not forget, however, that several doubts arise as to the

identity of the person representing Michelozzo.

Vasari recognises him in that old Nicodemus with a hood, who lowers

the Christ from the cross in the Deposition, while Milanesi, asserting

that Nicodemus has a saint's aureole not a cowl, holds that the

portrait of Michelozzo is to be seen in the figure with a black hood

who speaks with the disciple beneath him as he gives the body of the

Lord into his hands. Certainly Milanesi has good reason to doubt

Vasari's assertion, as Nicodemus has no hood: moreover Vasari himself

in his second edition of the Lives (1568) assigns as the architect's

likeness that very figure with a cowl who is speaking to the disciple.

Therefore we must admit that the Aretian Historian was mistaken either

in his indication of the figure, or in the reproduction of it as a

headpiece to his Life of Michelozzo.

In any case, a similar figure to that in the "Deposition," and with

the same head-gear, again appears a little older in the fresco of the

convent of San Marco representing the "Adoration of the Magi"; also in

another picture of the "Presentation in the Temple"; and in the little

square with a "Flight into Egypt", on one of the doors of SS.

Annunziata.

[Illustration: FLIGHT INTO EGYPT.]

If Michelozzo be really portrayed here, we must conclude that the

Deposition was painted long before 1442, and the press doors about the

same time, or a little later; but the student must take into account

the curious fact that in the "Deposition" the disciple who talks to

the man with a cowl above him, has also a certain resemblance to the

supposed Michelozzo, and that Nicodemus reappears as St. John Baptist

on the left of the large altar-piece painted for the church of San

Marco, as well as in the picture of the dead Christ, and also as the

kneeling King who kisses the feet of the Babe in the fresco of the

"Adoration of the Magi."

Therefore, without giving great importance to the question of the true

portrait of Michelozzo, we find that these heads, whether of Nicodemus

or the hooded disciple, are represented in various pictures by our

artist, modified by age, so that from them we may establish the

succession of the different works, i. e. first the "Dead Christ" of

the Company of the Temple, next the picture at San Marco (1438), then

the "Deposition," and lastly the fresco in San Marco, and the little

"Annunciation." Thus all these works would certainly date during Fra

Angelico's stay in Florence.

But to return to the doors of the presses in the SS. Annunziata, it is

true, as Rio writes, that instead of being a series of subjects for

future frescoes or altar-pieces, the "stories" seem a hasty resumé,

often too hasty, of works already painted in the convent of San Marco

or other places. Some of them are noticeable for firmness of design

and vigour of colouring, others instead are unworthy of the master and

evidently show another hand.

[Illustration: CHRIST BETRAYED BY JUDAS.]

[Illustration: THE RESURRECTION OF LAZARUS.]

To give this great work its due appreciation we must take it as a

whole, as the profound genius of Fra Angelico had conceived it.

Wishing to give it the unity of a dramatic poem, he placed at the

beginning and at the end, like a prologue and an epilogue, two

symbolic figures, in the last of which the seven branched candlestick

serves as a support to the Old and New Testaments.[54]

We may enumerate among the best scenes the "Flight into Egypt," the

"Slaughter of the Innocents," the "Betrayal of Judas," the "Dead

Christ," and the "Resurrection of Lazarus," all composed in Giottesque

style: but, when we think of the progress of Fra Angelico in art as

shown in the frescoes in San Marco, and his best panel paintings, we

cannot avoid noticing a certain want of vigour in these presses.

[Illustration: THE SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS.]

[Illustration: ENTOMBMENT OF CHRIST.]

Having become accustomed to the grander methods of fresco painting, in

which his talent and ability found greater scope for expression,--even

though not attaining to the ease and force of some of his

contemporaries and followers,--Fra Angelico must have now found

himself at the disadvantage, natural to one who, after moving free in

wider space, is suddenly cramped into narrower confines. This explains

why we find in some of these small panels, greater conventionality in

the representation of scenes and action, and less ease and correctness

of execution. We might add also, that many of them, where these

defects are especially evident, may be ascribed to other hands, less

clever than his own, those of his assistants who were called in to

expedite the work and assist the artist.

[Illustration: CORONATION OF THE VIRGIN.]

Rio believes that two of Angelico's paintings, one of which was once

in the Dominican monastery of San Vincenzo d' Annalena, and the other

in that of the Frati dell'Osservanza in Mugello, but now both at the

Belle Arti, were executed later than the frescoes in the Vatican, to

which they offer an extraordinary resemblance, not perceivable in the

artist's earlier works.[55]

[Illustration: THE SYMBOLIC WHEEL.]

We cannot, however, accept the assertion of the French critic. These

two pictures, though utterly different in character and type, too

forcibly recall his previous works. And as according to the same

author the altar-piece of the monks [55] of the Mugello resembles the

other in colouring, technique, the freer style of drapery, the type of

the Virgin and character of the figures, we might reasonably conclude

that both paintings belong to the period of his residence at Fiesole

or Florence, i. e. previous to his departure for Rome in 1445.

[Illustration: THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS.

(Annalena Convent.)]

[Illustration: THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH ANGELS AND SAINTS.

(From the Convent of the Osservanza.)]

We are even less inclined to endorse the opinion of Rio in regard to

the date of the painting from the Annalena Convent. The internal

organization of the convent was only regulated by a bull of Pope

Nicholas V. after 1450, so there is probably no connection between the

internal establishment of the convent and the Commission for the

picture.

The convent (it is well to remember) was founded in 1453, but the

religious intentions of Anna Elena Malatesta met with no slight

resistance, and it was not till 1455, that Pope Calixtus III. conceded

her permission to "build in her house a public oratory in which mass

should be celebrated and the divine Offices performed." We cannot then

admit that the picture was specially painted for the convent named[56]

after that saintly lady. When one reflects that Anna Elena Malatesta,

foundress of the monastery, was educated in the house of Attilio di

Vieri de' Medici, and was by Cosimo Pater Patriæ married to Baldaccio

of Anghiari, it is not unlikely that the picture had been a commission

from Cosimo, and that when Annalena was left a widow, and took the

vows in 1441, it was offered by him to the convent, to which the sad

widow had consecrated all her care. It is the more probable, that it

was painted for the Medici, because the two patron saints of their

house are represented in it.

SS. Cosmo and Damian only appear in the pictures painted by Fra

Angelico in Florence, probably in recognition of the benefits bestowed

by Cosimo on the monks of San Marco; moreover, we do not think the

work could have been done at Fiesole after the first visit to Rome in

1452, because the figures, weak in chiaroscuro, are still treated as

if they were enlarged miniatures, and do not show the character of his

later works. On the other hand the picture of the Osservanza in

Mugello displays the whole power of the artist, and may be compared,

as Rio says, to the panel at San Marco both in the character of the

figures and the larger style of treatment.

Vasari cites other works which have unfortunately been dispersed or

destroyed, among which were an altar-piece in the Certosa at Florence,

representing the "Virgin and Child," with some angels below, and at

the sides St. Laurence, St. Zenobi, and St. Benedict; the "Coronation

of the Madonna," once in the lunette of the Acciajoli chapel: another

with the "Virgin and two saints," painted "con azzurri oltramarini

bellissimi," (with beautiful ultramarine blues): and the pictures in

the dividing wall of Santa Maria Novella opposite the choir. The

"Annunciation," which according to Vasari was in the church of San

Francesco at San Miniato, and which Milanesi believes to be in the

Museum of Madrid, is instead now in the National Gallery at London. It

is a diptych, in one panel the archangel Gabriel, with golden wings

outspread, crossing his hands on his breast bows before the Virgin,

who in the other panel leans forward to listen to his blessed word.

The scene is in a cloister, from the arches of which a field of

flowers is seen, and in the distant horizon the outlines of the

Apennine mountains. A great lily blossoms beside the Virgin, the two

capitals of the columns of the cloister have the Albizzi arms carved

on them.

"This good Father painted so many pictures for the houses of the

citizens of Florence, that one wonders how one man could so perfectly

execute even in many years all that he has done." So writes Vasari,

and indeed a complete list of his paintings still existing in Italy

and elsewhere would be too long; those we have illustrated will,

however, suffice to give a good idea of his artistic genius, and the

sentiment with which this gentle artist could represent the marvellous

visions of a soul in love with heaven!

[Illustration: THE LAST SUPPER.]

IV.

FRA ANGELICO

AT ROME AND ORVIETO.

[1445-1455.]

[Illustration: CHRIST IN JUDGMENT. (Orvieto, Cathedral.)]

Fra Angelico(#21561) · 第 4 / 6 段