THE SPHERE OF WOMAN

[Speech of Edwin P. Whipple at the "Ladies' Night" banquet of the

Papyrus Club, Boston, February 15, 1879, in response to a toast in

his honor as "one whose gentle mind, delicate fancy, keen wit, and

profound judgment have made for him a high and secure place among

American authors."]

MR. CHAIRMAN:--I suppose that one of the most characteristic

follies of young men, unmarried, or in the opinion of prudent mammas,

unmarriageable, is, when they arrive at the age of indiscretion, to

dogmatize on what they call the appropriate sphere of woman. You

remember the thundering retort which came, like a box on the ears, to

one of these philosophers, when he was wisely discoursing vaguely on his

favorite theme. "And pray, my young sir," asked a stern matron of forty,

"will you please to tell us what is the appropriate sphere of woman?"

Thus confronted, he only babbled in reply, "A celestial sphere, madam!"

But the force of this compliment is now abated; for the persons who

above all others are dignified with the title of "Celestials" are the

Chinese; and these the Congress of the United States seems determined to

banish from our soil as unworthy--not only of the right of citizenship

and the right of suffrage, but the right of residing in our democratic

republic. Accordingly, we must find some more appropriate sphere for

women than the Celestial. Nobody, I take it, however bitterly he may be

opposed to what are called the rights of women, objects to their

residing in this country, or to their coming here in vast numbers.

[Applause.]

Do you remember to what circumstance Chicago owed its fame? When the

spot where a great city now looks out on Lake Michigan was the

habitation of a small number of men only, a steamboat was seen in the

distance, and the report was that it contained a cargo of women, who

were coming to the desolate place for the purpose of being married to

the forlorn men. Every bachelor hastened to the pier, with a telescope

in one hand and a speaking-trumpet in the other. By the aid of the

telescope each lover selected his mate, and by the aid of the

speaking-trumpet each lover made his proposals. In honor of the women

who made the venturesome voyage, the infant city was named "She-Cargo."

[Laughter and applause.]

Therefore, there is no possibility of a doubt that there is no objection

to women as residents of this country. The only thing to be considered

is, whether or not they shall have the right of voting. I think nobody

present here this evening has conceit enough to suppose that he is more

competent to give an intelligent vote on any public question than the

intelligent ladies who have done the Club the honor to be present on

this occasion. The privilege of voting is simply an opportunity, by

which certain persons legally qualified are allowed to exercise power.

The formal power is so subdivided that each legally qualified person

exercises but little. But where meanwhile is the substance of power?

Certainly in the woman of the household as well as in the man. Indeed, I

recollect that when an objection was raised that to give the right of

suffrage to women would create endless quarrels between husband and

wife, a married woman curtly replied that the wives would see to it that

no such disturbance should really take place. [Applause.] And, as the

question now stands, I pity the man who is so fortunate to be married to

a noble woman, coming home to meet her reproachful glance, when he has

deposited in the ballot-box a vote for a measure which is base and for a

candidate who is equally base. Then, in his humiliation before that

rebuking eye, he must feel that in her is the substance of power, and in

him only the formal expression of power. [Applause.]

But we have the good fortune to-night to have at the table many women of

letters, who have in an eminent degree exercised the substance of power,

inasmuch as they have domesticated themselves at thousands of firesides

where their faces have never been seen. Their brain-children have been

welcomed and adopted by fathers and mothers, by brothers and sisters, as

members of the family; and their sayings and doings are quoted as though

they were "blood" relations. Two instances recur to my memory. In

lecturing in various portions of the country, I have often been a guest

in private houses. On one occasion I happened to mention Mrs. Whitney as

a lady I had often met; and, instantly, old and young crowded round,

pouring in a storm of questions, demanding to know where the author of

"Faith Gartney" lived, how she looked, and was she so delightful in

society as she was in her books. On another occasion, my importance in a

large family was raised immensely when a chance remark indicated that I

numbered Miss Alcott among my friends. All the little men and all the

little women of the household, all the old men and all the old ladies,

rallied round me, in order that I might tell them all I knew of the

author of "Little Women" and "Little Men." [Applause.]

Now these are only two examples of the substance of power which

cultivated women already possess. That such women, and all women, can

obtain the formal power of voting at elections is, in the end, sure, if

they really wish to exercise that power; and that the power is withheld

from them is not due to the opposition of men, but is due to the fact

that they are not, by an overwhelming majority, in favor of it

themselves. When the champions of woman's rights get this majority on

their side, I have a profound pity for the men who venture to oppose it.

[Applause.]

Modern Eloquence: Vol III, After-Dinner Speeches P-Z · 第 160 / 186 题