I. First of all, the fact that they were together is significant.

How did they come to hold together? How had they not yielded to the

temptation to seek safety by flight, which would have been the natural

course after the death of their Leader on a charge of treason against

the Roman power? The process of disintegration had begun, and we see it

going on in the conduct of the disciples before the Resurrection. The

'Shepherd was smitten,' and, as a matter of course, 'the sheep' began

to 'scatter.' And yet here we find them back in Galilee, in their old

haunts, and not trying to escape by separation, which would have been

the first step suggested to ordinary men in an ordinary state of

things. But where everybody knew them, and they knew everybody, and

everybody knew them to be disciples of Jesus Christ, thither they go,

and hold together as if they had still a living centre and a uniting

bond. How did that come about? The fact that after Christ's death there

was a group of men united together simply and solely as disciples, and

exhibiting their unity as disciples conspicuously, in the face of the

men that knew them best, this forms a strange phenomenon that needs an

explanation. And there is only one explanation of it, that Jesus Christ

had risen from the dead. That drew them together once more. You cannot

build a Church on a dead Christ; and of all the proofs of the

Resurrection, I take it that there is none that it is harder for an

unbeliever to account for, in harmony with his hypothesis, than the

simple fact that Christ's disciples held together after He was dead,

and presented a united front to the world.

So, then, the fact of the group is itself significant, and we may claim

it as being a morsel of evidence for the historical veracity of the

resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. John Chaps. XV to XXI · 第 137 / 147 题