THE IRREVOCABLE PAST

'What I have written I have written.'--JOHN xix. 22.

This was a mere piece of obstinacy. Pilate knew that he had prostituted

his office in condemning Jesus, and he revenged himself for weak

compliance by ill-timed mulishness. A cool-headed governor would have

humoured his difficult subjects in such a trifle, as a just one would

have been inflexible in a matter of life and death. But this man's

facile yielding and his stiff-necked obstinacy were both misplaced. 'So

I will, so I command. Let my will suffice for a reason,' was what he

meant. He had written his gibe, and not all the Jews in Jewry should

make him change.

But his petulant answer to the rulers' request for the removal of the

offensive placard carried in it a deeper meaning, as the Title also

did, and as the people's fierce yell, 'His blood be on us and on our

children,' did. Possibly the Evangelist had some thought of that sort

in recording this saying; but, at all events, I venture to take a

liberty with it which I should not do if it were a word of God's, or if

it were given for our instruction. So I take it now as expressing in a

vivid way, and irrespective of Pilate's intention, the thought of the

irrevocable past.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. John Chaps. XV to XXI · 第 108 / 147 题