OLD POEM ON THE SIEGE OF ROUEN.

The city of Rouen makes too considerable a figure in the foregoing pages,

and its history, as connected with our own country in the earlier part of

the fifteenth century, is too interesting, to require any thing in the

shape of apology for the matter which the Reader is about to peruse. This

"matter" is necessarily incidental to the _present_ edition of the "Tour;"

as it is only recently made public. An "_Old English Poem_" on our Henry

the Fifth's "_Siege of Rouen_" is a theme likely to excite the attention of

the literary Antiquary on _either_ side of the Channel.

The late erudite, and ever to be lamented Rev. J.J. Conybeare, successively

Professor of the Saxon language, and of English Poetry in the University of

Oxford, discovered, in the exhaustless treasures of the Bodleian Library, a

portion of the Old English Poem in question: but it was a portion only. In

the 21st. vol. of the Archæologia, Mr. Conybeare gave an account of this

fortunate discovery, and subjoined the poetical fragment. Mr. Frederick

Madden, one of the Librarians attached to the MS. department in the British

Museum, was perhaps yet more fortunate in the discovery of the portion

which was lost: and in the 22d. vol. of the _Archæologia_, just published,

(pp. 350-398), he has annexed an abstract of the remaining fragment, with

copious and learned notes. This fragment had found its way, in a prose

attire, into the well-known English MS. Chronicle, called the

BRUTE:--usually (but most absurdly) attributed to Caxton. It is not however

to be found in _all_ the copies of this Chronicle. On the contrary, Mr.

Madden, after an examination of several copies of this MS. has found the

poem only in four of them: namely, in two among the Harleian MSS. (Nos.

753; 2256--from which _his_ transcript and collation have been made) in one

belonging to Mr. Coke of Holkham, and in a fourth belonging to the _Cotton_

Collection:--Galba E. viii. This latter MS. has a very close correspondence

with the _second_ Harl. MS. but is often faulty from errors of the Scribe,

See _Gentleman's Magazine, May_, 1829.

So much for the history of the discovery of this precious old English

Poem--which is allowed to be a contemporaneous production of the time of

the Siege--namely, A.D. 1418. A word as to its intrinsic worth--from the

testimony of the Critic most competent to appreciate it. "It will be

admitted, I believe, (says Mr. Madden) by all who will take the trouble

to compare the various contemporary narratives of the Siege of Rouen,

that in point of simplicity, clearness, and minuteness of detail, there

is NO existing document which can COMPARE with the Poem before us. Its

authenticity is sufficiently established, from the fact of the Author's

having been an EYEWITNESS of the whole. If we review the names of those

Historians who lived at the same period, we shall have abundant reason

to rejoice at so valuable an accession to our present stock of

information on the subject." _Archæologia_, vol. xxii. p. 353. The

reader shall be no longer detained from a specimen or two of the poem

itself, which should seem fully to justify the eulogy of the Critic.

"On the day after the return of the twelve delegates sent by the City of

Rouen to treat with Henry, the Poet proceeds to inform us, that the King

caused two tents to be pitched, one for the English Commissioners, and the

other for the French. On the English side were appointed the Earl of

Warwick, the Earl of Salisbury, the Lord Fitzhugh, and Sir Walter

Hungerford, and on the French side, twelve discreet persons were chosen to

meet them. Then says the writer,

'It was a sight of solempnity,

For to behold both party;

To see the rich in their array,

And on the walls the people that lay,

And on our people that were without,

How thick that they walked about;

And the heraudis seemly to seene,

How that they went ay between;

The king's heraudis and pursuivants,

In coats of arms _amyantis_.

The English a beast, the French a flower,

Of Portyngale both castle and tower,

And other coats of diversity,

As lords bearen in their degree.'

"As a striking contrast to this display of pomp and splendour is described

the deplorable condition of those unfortunate inhabitants who lay starving

in the ditches without the walls of the City, deprived both of food and

clothing. The affecting and simple relation of our Poet, who was an

eye-witness, is written with that display of feeling such a scene must

naturally have excited, and affords perhaps one of the most favourable

passages in the Poem to compare with the studied narratives of Elmham or

Livius. In the first instance we behold misery literally in rags, and

hiding herself in silence and obscurity, whilst in the other she is

ostentatiously paraded before our eyes:

'There men might see a great pity,

A child of two year or three

Go about, and bid his bread,

For Father and mother both lay dead,

And under them the water stood,

And yet they lay crying after food.

Some _storven_ to the death,

And some stopped both eyen and breath,

And some crooked in the knees,

And as lean as any trees,

And women holding in their arm

A dead child, and nothing warm,

And children sucking on the pap

Within a dead woman's lap.'

On Friday the 20th of January, King Henry V. made his public entry into

Rouen. His personal appearance is thus described:

'He rode upon a brown steed,

Of black damask was his weed,

A _Peytrelle_ of gold full bright

About his neck hung down right,

And a pendant behind him did honge

Unto the earth, it was so long.

And they that never before him did see,

They knew by the cheer which was he.'

"With the accustomed, but mistaken, piety for which Henry was ever

distinguished, he first proceeded to the monastery, where he alighted from

his charger, and was met by the chaplains of his household, who walked

before him, chanting _Quis est magnus Dominus?_ After the celebration of

mass, the king repaired to the Castle, where he took up his abode. By this

termination of a siege, which, for its duration and the horrors it

produced, is perhaps without a parallel in ancient or modern times, the

city was again plentifully supplied with provisions, and recovered the

shock so tedious and afflicting a contest had occasioned:

'And thus our gracious liege

Made an end of his siege;

And all that have heard this reading,

To his bliss Christ you bring,

That for us died upon a tree,

Amen say we all, _pur charite!_'

The Duke of Exeter is appointed Governor of the City, and ordered by Henry

to take possession of it the same night. The Duke mounts his horse, and

rides strait to the Port de Bevesyne or Beauvais, attended by a retinue, to

carry the commands of his sovereign into execution. His Entré, and the

truly miserable condition of the besieged, together with the imposing

appearance of Henry, shall now be described in the language of the poet.

Thanne the duke of Excestre withoute bode

Toke his hors and forth he rode,

To bevesyne[E] that porte so stronge,

That he hadde ley bifore so longe,

To that gate sone he kam,[F]

And with hym many a worthy[G] manne.

There was neying of many a stede,

And schynyng of many a gay wede,

There was many a getoun[H] gay,

With mychille[I] and grete aray.

And whanne the gate was openyd there,

And thay weren[J] redy into fare,

Trumpis[K] blewgh her bemys[L] of bras,

Pipis and clarionys forsothe ther was,

And as thay entrid thay gaf a schowte

With her[M] voyce that was fulle stowte,

'Seint George! seint George!' thay criden[N] on height,

And seide, 'welcome oure kynges righte.'

The Frensshe pepulle of that Cite

Were gederid by thousandes, hem to see.

Thay criden[N] alle welcome in fere,

'In siche tyme mote ye entre here,

Plesyng to God that it may be,

And to vs pees and vnyte.'

And of that pepulle, to telle the trewthe,

It was a sighte of fulle grete ruthe.

Mykelle of that folke therynne

Thay weren[O] but verrey bonys and skynne.

With eyen holowgh and[P] nose scharpe,

Vnnethe thay myght brethe or carpe,

For her colowris was[Q] wan as lede,

Not like to lyue but sone ben dede.

Disfigurid pateronys[R] and quaynte,

And as[S] a dede kyng thay weren paynte.

There men myght see an[T] exampleyre,

How fode makith the pepulle faire.[U]

In euery strete summe lay dede,

And hundriddis krying aftir brede.

And aftir long many a day,

Thay deyde as[V] faste as[W] they myght be lad away.

Into[X] that way God hem wisse,

That thay may come to his blisse! amen.

Now[Y] wille y more spelle,

And of the duke of exestre to[Z] telle.

To that Castelle firste he rode,

And sythen[AA] the Cite alle abrode;

Lengthe and brede he it mette,

And rich baneris he[AB] vp sette.

Vpon the porte seint Hillare

A Baner of the Trynyte.

And at[AC] the port Kaux he sette evene

A baner of the quene of heven.

And at[AD] port martvile he vppyght Of seint George a baner bryght.

He sette vpon the Castelle to[AE] stonde

The armys of Fr[a]unce and Englond.

And on the Friday in the mornynge

Into that Cite come oure kynge.

And alle the Bisshoppis in her aray,

And vij. abbottis with Crucchis[AF] gay;

xlij.[AG] crossis ther were of Religioune[AH],

And seculere, and alle thay went a precessioun,

Agens that prince withoute the toune,

And euery Cros as thay stode

He blessid hem with milde mode,

And holy water with her hande

Thay gaf the prince of oure lande.

And at[AI] the porte Kaux so wide

He in passid withoute[AJ] pride;

Withoute pipe or bemys blaste,

Our kyng worthyly he in paste.

And as a conquerour in his righte

Thankyng[AK] euer god almyghte;

And alle the pepulle in that Citie

'Wilcome our[AL] lorde,' thay seide, 'so fre!

Wilcome into[AM] thyne owne righte,

As it is the[AN] wille of[AO] god almyght.'

With that thay kryde alle _'nowelle!_'

Os[AP] heighe as thay myght yelle.

He rode vpon a browne stede,

Of blak damaske was his wede.

A peytrelle[AQ] of golde fulle bryght

Aboute his necke hynge[AR] doun right,

And a pendaunte behynd him dide[AS] honge

Vnto the erthe, it was so longe,

And thay that neuer before hym dide[AT] see,

Thay knew by chere[u] wiche was he.

To the mynster dide he fare,

And of his horse he lighte there.

His chapelle[AU] mette hym at[AV] the dore there,

And wente bifore[AW] hym alle in fere,

And songe a response[AX] fulle glorivs,

_Quis est magnus dominus_.

Messe he hirde and offrid thoo,

And thanne to the Castelle dide he goo.

That is a place of rialte,

And a paleis of grete beaute.

There he hym[AY] loggid in the Toune,

With rialle and grete renoune.

And the[AZ] cite dide faste encrece

Of brede and wyne, fisshe, and fflesshe.[BA]

And thus oure gracious liege

Made an ende of his seege.

And alle that[BB] haue hirde this redynge[BC]

To his[BD] blisse criste you brynge,

That for vs deide vpon[BE] a tre,

Amen sey[BF] we alle, pur cherite!

_There was many a getoun gay_.] The following particulars relative to the

_getoun_ appear in MS. Harl. 838. "Euery baronet euery estat aboue hym shal

have hys baner displeyd in y'e field yf he be chyef capteyn, euery knyght

his penoun, euery squier or gentleman hys _getoun_ or standard." "Item, y'e

meyst lawfully fle fro y'e standard and _getoun_, but not fro y'e baner ne

penon.". "Nota, a stremer shal stand in a top of a schyp or in y'e

fore-castel: a stremer shal be slyt and so shal a standard as welle as a

_getoun_: a _getoun_ shal berr y'e length of ij yardes, a standard of iii

or 4 yardes, and a stremer of xii. xx. xl. or lx. yardes longe."

This account is confirmed by MS. Harl. 2258, and Lansd. 225. f. 431. as

quoted by Mr. Nicholas, in the Retrosp. Rev. vol. i. N.S. The former of

these MSS. states: Euery standard and _Guydhome_ [whence the etymology of

the word is obvious] to have in the chief the crosse of St. George, to be

slitte at the ende, and to conteyne the creste or supporter, with the

posey, worde, and devise of the owner." It adds, that "a guydhome must be

two yardes and a halfe, or three yardes longe." This rule may sometimes

have been neglected, at least by artists, for in a bill of expences for the

Earl of Warwick, dated July 1437, and printed by Dugdale, (Warw. p. 327.)

we find the following entry; "Item, a _gyton_ for the shippe of viij.

yerdis long, poudrid full of raggid staves, for the lymnyng and

workmanship, ijs." The Grant of a _guydon_ made in 1491 to Hugh Vaughan, is

preserved in the College of Arms. It contains his crest placed

longitudinally. _Retrospective Review, New Series_, vol. i. p. 511.

[E] _bewesyns_.

[F] _came_.

[G] _worthy_ deest.

[H] A species of banner or streamer. See Note.

[I] _noble_.

[J] _were_.

[K] Trumpeters.

[L] Trumpets.

[M] _that_.

[N] cryed.

[O] _were_.

[P] _with nose_.

[Q] _were_.

[R] _patrons_.--Workmens' models or figures. _Patrone_, forme to

werke by. _Prompt. Parvul_. MS. Harl. 221. There is probably here

an allusion to the waxen or wooden effigies placed on the hearse of

distinguished personages.

[S] _as dede thyng they were peynte_.

[T] _in_.

[U] _to fare_.

[V] as _deest_.

[W] _as cartes led awey_.

[X] _Vnto_.

[Y] In MS. Harl. 753, a break is here made, and a large capital letter

introduced.

[Z] _to_ deest.

[AA] _sithe_.

[AB] _vp he_.

[AC] _atte porte kauxoz_.

[AD] _atte_ porte.

[AE] _that stounde_.

[AF] Crosses.

[AG] xliiij.

[AH] _religiouns_.

[AI] _atte porte hauxoz_.

[AJ] The remainder, of this, and the two following lines are omitted.

[AK] _Thanked_.

[AL] _they seyde our lord so free_.

[AM] _vnto_.

[AN] _the_ deest.

[AO] _to_.

[AP] _As_.

[AQ] Poitrell, breast plate.

[AR] _hangyng_.

[AS] _dide_ deest.

[AT] _the_ chere.

[AU] The chaplains of his household. Lat. _capella_.

[AV] _atte_ dore, _there_ deest.

[AW] _afore_.

[AX] _respon._

[AY] _logged hym._

[AZ] _his cite fast encrest_.

[BA] _beste_.

[BB] _that_ deest.

[BC] _tydyng_.

[BD] _his_ deest.

[BE] on.

[BF] _seyde all for charitee_.

BRONZE GILT ANTIQUE STATUE AT LILLEBONNE, p. 127-8.

This Statue, as the above reference will testify, is now in the possession

of Mr. Samuel Woodburn, of St. Martin's Lane. When the note relating to it

was written, I could, not place my hand upon a Brochure (in my possession)

published at Rouen in 1823,[176] containing an archaeological description

of this Statue by M. Revet, and a scientific account of its component

parts, by M. Houton La Billardière, Professor of Chemistry at Rouen. The

former embodied his remarks in two letters addressed to the Prefect of the

Lower Seine. A print of the figure in its then extremely mutilated state,

is prefixed; but its omission would have been no great drawback to the

publication--which, in its details, appears to be ingenious, learned, and

satisfactory. The highest praise is given to the Statue, as a work of art

of the second century.[177] Its _identity_ seems to be yet a subject of

disputation:--but M. Revet considers it as "the representation of some

idolatrous divinity." The opinion of its being a representation of Bacchus,

or of Apollo, or of a Constellation, he thinks might be regulated by a

discovery of some emblem, or attribute, found in the vicinity of the

Statue. Two other plates--lithographised--relating to explanations of the

pieces of the Statue, close this interesting performance.

[176] "_Description de la, Statue Fruste, en Bronze Doré, trouvée a

Lillebonne &c. Suivie de l'Analyse du Métal, avec le dessein de la

Statue, et les Tracés de quelques particularités relatives à la

Confection de cette Antique." Rouen,_ 1823. pp. 56.

[177] Other details induce me to fix the period of its completion towards

the end of the second century: and after the unheard of difficulties

which the artist had to overcome, one would scarcely be believed if

one said that every thing is executed in a high state of perfection."

p. 34.

A Bibliographical, Antiquarian and Picturesque Tour in France and Germany, Volume One · 第 89 / 121 题