C. ROSS.

The communication of E. S. S. W. (Vol. ii., p. 6.), which is as interesting

as it is shocking, induces me to send you a short extract from _Harrison's

Derby and Nottingham Journal, or Midland Advertiser_. The number of this

journal which is dated Thursday, September 23, 1779, contains as follows:--

"On Saturday two prisoners were capitally convicted at the Old Bailey

of high treason, viz. Isabella Condon, for coining shillings in

Cold-Bath-Fields; and John Field, for coining shillings in Nag's Head

Yard, Bishopsgate Street. They will receive sentence to be drawn on a

hurdle to the place of execution; _the woman to be burnt_, and the man

to be hanged."

I presume that the sentence which the woman underwent was not executed. The

barbarous fulfilment of such a law was, it may be hoped, already obsolete.

The motives, however, upon which this law was grounded is worth noting:--

"In treason of every kind," says Blackstone, "the punishment of women

is the same, and different from that of men. For, _as the decency due

to the sex forbids the exposing and publicly mangling their bodies_,

their sentence (which is to the full as terrible to sensation as the

other) is to be drawn to the gallows, and there to be burned alive."

"But," says the foot-note, "by the statute 30 Geo. III. c. 48., women

convicted in all cases of treason, shall receive judgment to be drawn

to the place of execution, and there to be hanged by the neck till

dead."

The law, therefore, under which a woman could be put to death by burning,

was repealed in 1790.

Notes and Queries, Number 34, June 22, 1850 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 8 / 78 题