MONDAY, AUGUST 16.

Dr. William Robertson came to breakfast. We talked of _Ogden on Prayer_.

Dr. Johnson said, 'The same arguments which are used against GOD'S

hearing prayer, will serve against his rewarding good, and punishing

evil. He has resolved, he has declared, in the former case as in the

latter.' He had last night looked into Lord Hailes's _Remarks on the

History of Scotland_. Dr. Robertson and I said, it was a pity Lord

Hailes did not write greater things. His lordship had not then published

his _Annals of Scotland_[93]. JOHNSON. 'I remember I was once on a

visit at the house of a lady for whom I had a high respect. There was a

good deal of company in the room. When they were gone, I said to this

lady, "What foolish talking have we had!" "Yes, (said she,) but while

they talked, you said nothing." I was struck with the reproof. How much

better is the man who does anything that is innocent, than he who does

nothing. Besides, I love anecdotes[94]. I fancy mankind may come, in

time, to write all aphoristically, except in narrative; grow weary of

preparation, and connection, and illustration, and all those arts by

which a big book is made. If a man is to wait till he weaves anecdotes

into a system, we may be long in getting them, and get but few, in

comparison of what we might get.

Dr. Robertson said, the notions of _Eupham Macallan_, a fanatick woman,

of whom Lord Hailes gives a sketch, were still prevalent among some of

the Presbyterians; and therefore it was right in Lord Hailes, a man of

known piety, to undeceive them[95].

We walked out[96], that Dr. Johnson might see some of the things which

we have to shew at Edinburgh. We went to the Parliament-House[97],

where the Parliament of Scotland sat, and where the _Ordinary Lords_ of

Session hold their courts; and to the New Session-House adjoining to it,

where our Court of Fifteen (the fourteen _Ordinaries_, with the Lord

President at their head,) sit as a court of Review. We went to the

_Advocates Library_[98], of which Dr. Johnson took a cursory view, and

then to what is called the _Laigh_[99] (or under) Parliament-House,

where the records of Scotland, which has an universal security by

register, are deposited, till the great Register Office be finished. I

was pleased to behold Dr. Samuel Johnson rolling about in this old

magazine of antiquities. There was, by this time, a pretty numerous

circle of us attending upon him. Somebody talked of happy moments for

composition; and how a man can write at one time, and not at another.

'Nay, (said Dr. Johnson,) a man may write at any time, if he will set

himself _doggedly_[100] to it.'

I here began to indulge _old Scottish_[101] sentiments, and to express a

warm regret, that, by our Union with _England_, we were no more;--our

independent kingdom was lost[102]. JOHNSON. 'Sir, never talk of your

independency, who could let your Queen remain twenty years in captivity,

and then be put to death, without even a pretence of justice, without

your ever attempting to rescue her; and such a Queen too; as every man

of any gallantry of spirit would have sacrificed his life for[103].'

Worthy Mr. JAMES KERR, Keeper of the Records. 'Half our nation was

bribed by English money.' JOHNSON. 'Sir, that is no defence: that makes

you worse.' Good Mr. BROWN, Keeper of the Advocates' Library. 'We had

better say nothing about it.' BOSWELL. 'You would have been glad,

however, to have had us last war, sir, to fight your battles!' JOHNSON.

'We should have had you for the same price, though there had been no

Union, as we might have had Swiss, or other troops. No, no, I shall

agree to a separation. You have only to _go home_.' Just as he had said

this, I, to divert the subject, shewed him the signed assurances of the

three successive Kings of the Hanover family, to maintain the

Presbyterian establishment in Scotland. 'We'll give you that (said he)

into the bargain.'

We next went to the great church of St. Giles, which has lost its

original magnificence in the inside, by being divided into four places

of Presbyterian worship[104]. 'Come, (said Dr. Johnson jocularly to

Principal Robertson[105],) let me see what was once a church!' We

entered that division which was formerly called the _New Church_, and of

late the _High Church_, so well known by the eloquence of Dr. Hugh

Blair. It is now very elegantly fitted up; but it was then shamefully

dirty[106]. Dr. Johnson said nothing at the time; but when we came to

the great door of the Royal Infirmary, where upon a board was this

inscription, '_Clean your feet!_' he turned about slyly and said, 'There

is no occasion for putting this at the doors of your churches!'

We then conducted him down the Post-house stairs, Parliament-close, and

made him look up from the Cow-gate to the highest building in Edinburgh,

(from which he had just descended,) being thirteen floors or stories

from the ground upon the back elevation; the front wall being built upon

the edge of the hill, and the back wall rising from the bottom of the

hill several stories before it comes to a level with the front wall. We

proceeded to the College, with the Principal at our head. Dr. Adam

Fergusson, whose _Essay on the History of Civil Society[107]_ gives him

a respectable place in the ranks of literature, was with us. As the

College buildings[108] are indeed very mean, the Principal said to Dr.

Johnson, that he must give them the same epithet that a Jesuit did when

shewing a poor college abroad: '_Hae miseriae nostrae_.' Dr. Johnson

was, however, much pleased with the library, and with the conversation

of Dr. James Robertson, Professor of Oriental Languages, the Librarian.

We talked of Kennicot's edition of the Hebrew Bible[109], and hoped it

would be quite faithful. JOHNSON. 'Sir, I know not any crime so great

that a man could contrive to commit, as poisoning the sources of

eternal truth.'

I pointed out to him where there formerly stood an old wall enclosing

part of the college, which I remember bulged out in a threatening

manner, and of which there was a common tradition similar to that

concerning _Bacon's_ study at Oxford, that it would fall upon some very

learned man[110]. It had some time before this been taken down, that the

street might be widened, and a more convenient wall built. Dr. Johnson,

glad of an opportunity to have a pleasant hit at Scottish learning,

said, 'they have been afraid it never would fall.'

We shewed him the Royal Infirmary, for which, and for every other

exertion of generous publick spirit in his power, that noble-minded

citizen of Edinburgh, George Drummond, will be ever held in honourable

remembrance. And we were too proud not to carry him to the Abbey of

Holyrood-house, that beautiful piece of architecture, but, alas! that

deserted mansion of royalty, which Hamilton of Bangour, in one of his

elegant poems, calls

'A virtuous palace, where no monarch dwells[111].'

I was much entertained while Principal Robertson fluently harangued to

Dr. Johnson, upon the spot, concerning scenes of his celebrated _History

of Scotland_. We surveyed that part of the palace appropriated to the

Duke of Hamilton, as Keeper, in which our beautiful Queen Mary lived,

and in which David Rizzio was murdered; and also the State Rooms. Dr.

Johnson was a great reciter of all sorts of things serious or comical. I

overheard him repeating here in a kind of muttering tone, a line of the

old ballad, _Johnny Armstrong's Last Good Night_:

'And ran him through the fair body[112]!'

We returned to my house, where there met him, at dinner, the Duchess of

Douglas[113], Sir Adolphus Oughton, Lord Chief Baron, Sir William

Forbes, Principal Robertson, Mr. Cullen[114], Advocate. Before dinner he

told us of a curious conversation between the famous George

Faulkner[115] and him. George said that England had drained Ireland of

fifty thousand pounds in specie, annually, for fifty years. 'How so,

Sir! (said Dr. Johnson,) you must have a very great trade?' 'No trade.'

'Very rich mines?' 'No mines.' 'From whence, then, does all this money

come?' 'Come! why out of the blood and bowels of the poor people

of Ireland!'

He seemed to me to have an unaccountable prejudice against Swift[116];

for I once took the liberty to ask him, if Swift had personally offended

him, and he told me he had not. He said to-day, 'Swift is clear, but he

is shallow. In coarse humour, he is inferior to Arbuthnot[117]; in

delicate humour, he is inferior to Addison. So he is inferior to his

contemporaries; without putting him against the whole world. I doubt if

the _Tale of a Tub_ was his[118]: it has so much more thinking, more

knowledge, more power, more colour, than any of the works which are

indisputably his. If it was his, I shall only say, he was _impar

sibi_[119].'

We gave him as good a dinner as we could. Our Scotch muir-fowl, or

growse, were then abundant, and quite in season; and so far as wisdom

and wit can be aided by administering agreeable sensations to the

palate, my wife took care that our great guest should not be deficient.

Sir Adolphus Oughton, then our Deputy Commander in Chief, who was not

only an excellent officer, but one of the most universal scholars I ever

knew, had learned the Erse language, and expressed his belief in the

authenticity of Ossian's Poetry[120]. Dr. Johnson took the opposite side

of that perplexed question; and I was afraid the dispute would have run

high between them. But Sir Adolphus, who had a very sweet temper,

changed the discourse, grew playful, laughed at Lord Monboddo's[121]

notion of men having tails, and called him a Judge, _à posteriori_,

which amused Dr. Johnson; and thus hostilities were prevented.

At supper[122] we had Dr. Cullen, his son the advocate, Dr. Adam

Fergusson, and Mr. Crosbie, advocate. Witchcraft was introduced[123].

Mr. Crosbie said, he thought it the greatest blasphemy to suppose evil

spirits counteracting the Deity, and raising storms, for instance, to

destroy his creatures. JOHNSON. 'Why, Sir, if moral evil be consistent

with the government of the Deity, why may not physical evil be also

consistent with it? It is not more strange that there should be evil

spirits, than evil men: evil unembodied spirits, than evil embodied

spirits. And as to storms, we know there are such things; and it is no

worse that evil spirits raise them, than that they rise.' CROSBIE. 'But

it is not credible, that witches should have effected what they are said

in stories to have done.' JOHNSON. 'Sir, I am not defending their

credibility. I am only saying, that your arguments are not good, and

will not overturn the belief of witchcraft.--(Dr. Fergusson said to me,

aside, 'He is right.')--And then, Sir, you have all mankind, rude and

civilized, agreeing in the belief of the agency of preternatural powers.

You must take evidence: you must consider, that wise and great men have

condemned witches to die[124].' CROSBIE. 'But an act of parliament put

an end to witchcraft[125].' JOHNSON. 'No, Sir; witchcraft had ceased;

and therefore an act of parliament was passed to prevent persecution for

what was not witchcraft. Why it ceased, we cannot tell, as we cannot

tell the reason of many other things.'--Dr. Cullen, to keep up the

gratification of mysterious disquisition, with the grave address for

which he is remarkable in his companionable as in his professional

hours, talked, in a very entertaining manner, of people walking and

conversing in their sleep. I am very sorry I have no note of this. We

talked of the _Ouran-Outang_, and of Lord Monboddo's thinking that he

might be taught to speak. Dr. Johnson treated this with ridicule. Mr.

Crosbie said, that Lord Monboddo believed the existence of every thing

possible; in short, that all which is in _posse_ might be found in

_esse_. JOHNSON. 'But, Sir, it is as possible that the _Ouran-Outang_

does not speak, as that he speaks. However, I shall not contest the

point. I should have thought it not possible to find a Monboddo; yet

_he_ exists.' I again mentioned the stage. JOHNSON. 'The appearance of a

player, with whom I have drunk tea, counteracts the imagination that he

is the character he represents. Nay, you know, nobody imagines that he

is the character he represents. They say, "See _Garrick!_ how he looks

to night! See how he'll clutch the dagger!" That is the buz of the

theatre[126].'

Life of Johnson, Volume 5 Tour to the Hebrides (1773) and Journey into North Wales (1774) · 第 25 / 228 题