It was the fourth original "Boy With Drum."

* * * * *

Before the art world had time to digest the incredible evidence of the

four identical Manets, the second series of incidents took place.

This time the locale was Rome, and the painting involved was Holbein's

famous portrait of the Duke of Kent, one of the ornaments of the

Pellagrini Gallery. At half-past ten on a Monday morning, a truck

arrived at the rear of the building to deliver a large crate. There was

no clue on the exterior of the crate as to its origin or contents, but

Gallery officials, assuming that their curiosity would be satisfied by

some document tacked within, signed the delivery receipt and had the

crate lugged to a store-room. Opening it, they found no such document,

only what appeared to be a marvelously clever imitation of their

precious Holbein.

They chuckled merrily at the joke. Then one of them remarked innocently

that it reminded him of the remarkable Manet duplications which were

currently vexing the English. At once a pall of doubt settled over

the group. Another Manet case? Utter nonsense! But that afternoon,

the Roman counterpart of Dr. Joll was quietly called in to examine

the strange gift. Professor Rienzo was not as swift as his English

colleague, and was still inspecting the supposed forgery the next

morning, when a different truck arrived with another portrait of the

Duke of Kent, just like the first.

Indeed, it was also just like the one that hung so proudly in the

Gallery itself--at least that was Professor Rienzo's firm opinion,

enunciated the following day at a special meeting of the Gallery's

directors. "I stake my reputation on it!" Rienzo declared. "You have

now three Holbein Kents, identically the same!"

But Rienzo was wrong. There were not three Kents, but four, for another

one had just arrived. The next day, the fifth appeared, and thus,

on the day after that, the entire staff of the Gallery waited in a

delirium of expectation for Holbein Kent VI. They were not disappointed.

Where had the canvases come from? But, like the London dealers, the

Pellagrini Gallery officials were unable to find out. They could follow

the trail back only as far as some young man on a street-corner, or

in a hotel lobby, or again, at some sidewalk cafe, each time waiting

calmly with his crate for the appearance of the summoned truck--then

vanishing.

In their agitation, the custodians of the multiple Holbein considered

trying to hush up the affair, but they had barely broached the topic

when the mysterious donor rendered further discussion useless. Holbein

Kent VII was duly delivered--not to the Gallery, however, but to the

art editor of one of Rome's great newspapers. The story was out in the

open.

* * * * *

In the following weeks, the tempo quickened. No longer were there

isolated incidents, first in one city and then in another. The plague

of original masterpieces became epidemic.

_Item_: Every art dealer in Vienna received, on the same day,

twenty-five different paintings by Picasso, Braque, and Matisse.

Each was subsequently established as being fully authentic, to the

consternation of those museums and private collectors in a dozen

countries who had acquired, at enormous cost, the originals.

_Item_: The Tate Gallery in London was notified by the confused

headmaster of a private school near Bath that one thousand copies

of a celebrated Van Gogh had been delivered to him, apparently

in error. At least, he said, they _seemed_ to be copies. He had

recalled that the Tate owned the original. Perhaps the shipment

had been intended for the Gallery? The Tate officials grimly agreed

that it probably had.

_Item_: One morning, the base of one exterior wall of the Louvre

was found to be solidly lined with the "Mona Lisa." There were

hundreds of them, side by side, smiling enigmatically out across

the Seine, and each, naturally, was as genuine as the single one

inside the great palace.

* * * * *

What was perhaps the most serious case occurred in New York. Directors

of a famous art museum were notified one day in a letter from a law

firm that a wealthy gentleman, recently deceased, had willed to the

museum his entire collection of paintings. Would the directors care to

appear at such-and-such an address the following day to inspect the

offered canvases? The directors wrote a polite acknowledgment and the

next day dispatched one of their junior members to the address given.

Presumably the donor had left them an attic-full of junk, but still

there might be something worthwhile there.

The junior member telephoned his colleagues at once. They hastened

to the spot. The collection was most remarkable. It covered every

wall of every room in an otherwise vacant five-story building, and

the directors could hardly call any of it junk, for it duplicated

with the most appalling exactitude the entire contents of their own

museum. Every last painting was reproduced there, and as if that were

not enough, inspection of the basement revealed that for each canvas

displayed in the rooms above, a precise duplicate existed in storage.

The directors were aghast. It was Manet and Holbein all over again, but

on a scale beyond all imagining. To make matters worse, someone had

impudently tipped off the press, and there was a crowd of reporters and

photographers, not to mention a number of curiosity-seekers who had

wandered in from the street. One of the directors telephoned the museum

and ordered it closed immediately, but of course that could not prevent

the instant collapse of the values of the museum's collection.

Once more, investigation proved fruitless. The law firm indignantly

denied authorship of the letter. Someone evidently had purloined the

stationery. The dead man, too, was a fraud, having never existed, and

as for the person who had rented the building, the real estate agent

could recall only that it was a young man named Smith, who had paid in

advance weeks earlier, and had not been seen since.

* * * * *

By this time, the entire art world was in a state of nervous collapse.

Dozens of masterworks had been rendered worthless by their sheer

profusion. Others joined the list every day. Collectors sought

frantically to sell--but no one would buy. Even those paintings as yet

untouched by the blight could not be sold, for what buyer could be sure

that a hundred identical canvases would not quickly turn up elsewhere?

Dealers' offices were closed, museum doors were shut--and most horrible

of all, artists were ceasing to paint.

In desperation, the leading museums and galleries pooled funds to hire

private detectives. Weeks passed, and the flow of originals continued,

but the detectives failed to produce a single positive lead--except for

one, and it was so fantastic that the art impresarios angrily rejected

it.

One shipment of masterpieces had been traced, through an intricate

system of straw parties and other devices, back to the New York

apartment of Dr. Cyrus E. Browl. Could the Wizard of Light be the

mass-production virtuoso? Ridiculous! Several of the museum directors

remembered his fumbling attempts to copy their treasures. It had been

pathetic--the old man had been clumsier than the rawest novice, and

besides, his eyes were so weak now, he could hardly see across a room!

But one of the art experts was suddenly struck by the memory of that

huge easel and the peculiar array of lightless lamps, and hastened off

to pay Dr. Browl a visit. He quickly returned, looking much older, and

in an unsteady voice made a report:

"I've seen Dr. Browl--and I've seen _it_."

"Seen what?"

The wizard of light · 第 4 / 7 题