THE CIRCLE OF THE SCIENCES.

Prof. J. T. Edwards, of Chamberlain Institute, N. Y., is to deliver

a course of eight lectures before the C. T. R. at Chautauqua this

summer. “Physical Science” is to be the subject of these lectures, the

design being to show how all the sciences, botany, zoölogy, etc., are

but sectors of one great circle, that one plan underlies all natural

phenomena. The lectures will be brilliantly illustrated and will be of

peculiar value to teachers. Prof. Edwards has sent us the following

outline of his work, which shows that though his theme is extended, yet

it is so systematized as to be very simple:

[Illustration]

Nature is a unit. _E pluribus unum_ might be taken for its motto; the

circle is its emblem; ten thousand radii touch its circumference; every

atom bears a relation to its center; everything is connected with

everything. It was not a mere fancy that when the Creator made even

the little snow-drop, he adjusted it to the gravities of all worlds.

Humboldt chose “Cosmos” as the title of his immortal work, and he

defined it, “The doctrine of the universe, the system of law, harmony

and truth combined within the universe.”

Glance at the copious index. What diversity in the subjects discussed.

We wonder how he will be able to fit into beautiful mosaic all these

fragments.

A large look at nature sees it one. The spectroscope now tells us that

all worlds are but “parts of one stupendous whole.” Matter is ever

changing, but never lost. Force is indestructible; a thousand floods

ten thousand years ago prepared the earth for habitation. Feeble

insects laid the foundations of Paris and London perhaps millions of

years before the Romans drove piles into the Thames. Our stove and coal

bins are ninety millions of miles away. Nature is full of beautiful

dependencies. The animal feeds upon the vegetable, and the latter

lives upon the mineral kingdom. The mere physical forces of light,

heat and electricity are doubtless directly connected with the noblest

activities of organized beings.

Now, one object of this course of lectures is to show things in their

connections. Bird’s-eye views are very essential in the study of large

landscapes. The poet is not the only “maker.” Most minds prefer the

concrete to the abstract—synthesis to analysis. The gem is never so

beautiful as in its appropriate setting. The springing bow alone shows

us the splendor of each color.

_Astronomy_, “Mother of the Sciences,” will “teach us our place”

among the worlds; will tell of the time when the “morning stars were

singing.” Some of the greatest and some of the most devout minds of

every age have delighted in this study. Its votaries now, however,

are no longer alone on the watch-towers. Observers stand with them,

eager to gaze upon the stars, although with less trained vision.

Bishop Warren’s delightful book shows us the possibility of being both

accurate and interesting. He just supplements “the look” that was given

at “The Point” in the days “lang syne,” with a longer and steadier gaze

into the heavens.

As Astronomy will show us the infinitely large, _Chemistry_ will

bring to us the infinitely small. Here we are in Nature’s laboratory.

Listen! We can almost hear the myriad atoms, like unseen battalions in

the night, quietly falling into line. It is as if we had penetrated

the arcana of Nature. See! Here she mingles her dyes. Hence come the

odors, the flavors, the forms of all substances. No wonder the old

alchemist hung over his crucible (_crux_, across—the mark upon the

vessel to guard against the _geests_, ghosts—_our gas_—which threatened

him) until the divining rod fell from his palsied hand. There is a

rare fascination in the study. It so closely concerns human welfare.

The useful as well as the fine arts, agriculture, manufacturing, and

all our domestic life are intimately concerned in its discoveries and

progress, and when we have learned how wonderful a thing is a molecule

we are prepared to learn of masses of minerals. _Mineralogy_ is less

understood than some other of the natural sciences; for a few years

past, however, it has pushed forward rapidly. The impetus given to

mining, the formation of cabinets, of great mineralogical displays,

such as that at Denver the past year, and the mineral treasures

of Australia, California, and Colorado have awakened much popular

interest. Gold was mentioned in the first chapter of Genesis, and the

enumeration of precious stones in various parts of the Old Testament,

and in Revelation, shows that the ancients were not unacquainted with

the more beautiful forms of minerals. It remained, however for our time

to show that even the clod beneath our feet, the rock of the mountain,

and the ice of the glacier are built with the precision of a marble

palace. There is a beautiful simplicity in these combinations. They

can all be reduced to six primary forms. This science and the closely

allied branch of Crystalography fortunately can be made very pleasing

to the eye by means of the helps which we can summon. Thus we are led

by gradual steps to consider _Geology_, or the study of the earth, as

to its great features. And what a theme it is! Ocean making! continent

building! mountain raising! making of worlds! The story is written in

strata by fossils, or in the markings left by some great force in the

earth’s crust.

No science has more interest for the artist, the architect, the civil

engineer. But perhaps a deeper and more solemn interest attaches to it

because of its relations to the all-important truths of Revelation.

Fortunately this branch of human knowledge has not been forced to

depend upon individual enterprise or love of truth. It has knocked at

the halls of legislation; it has been welcomed to the palaces of kings.

For lo! it came promising greater riches than were ever dreamed of

by Spanish free-booters, and many a State has found through it an El

Dorado within its own limits.

_Physics_, or Natural Philosophy, will next explain to us more fully by

illustration and apparatus, the characteristics of those forces which

join together the molecules, not less than hold the worlds in harmony.

It is an old science, but has clothed itself in new garments. In some

directions, as in acoustics and light, it has made very wonderful

progress within the memory of the school-boy of to-day. The “Arabian

Nights” has few things to tell us so startling as that a man can sit in

his office in New York and hold converse with a friend in Chicago.

Never before did man give such good promise of really entering upon his

heritage as master in this world, in the spirit of the high destiny

that was promised him at his creation.

_Botany_ comes next. It has been quite the fashion to look upon this

study as unworthy the attention of the vigorous masculine mind—“a

girl’s study, about posy-beds, the language of flowers, and, at best,

fit only for the decoration of a poet’s verse!” And yet it concerns one

whole wide realm of nature. It has received little attention in our

colleges, scarcely finding a place in the curriculum of study.

It really embraces a number of separate sciences—economic,

agricultural, horticultural, medical and fossil botany. Of late a new

interest has been awakened in some of these. The climatic relations

of forests have become matter of legislative inquiry. Great forestry

conventions have been held, and an able report upon the subject has

been made by the Commissioner of Agriculture. A gentleman in New York

has just made an appropriation of twenty-five thousand dollars for the

best collection of woods in the world. Aside from these utilitarian

views of the matter it is enough for us to know that the Great Teacher

said: “Consider the lilies,” and often upon Olivet or “by cool Siloam’s

shady rill,” seemed to take pleasure in the trees and flowers which his

own hand had made.

_Zoölogy_ will show us a comparative view of the animal creation. A

whole literature upon this subject has sprung up within a few years.

Darwin and Huxley have added many close and admirable observations

upon the habits of animals. Numerous books have appeared upon “Mind

in Animals,” “Higher Life in Animals,” and kindred topics, until one

almost trembles for his rank in the scale of being. Indeed, when

royalty weeps over the departure of Jumbo, and lap-dogs and canaries

win the first place in the hearts of fair ladies, we may well review

our claims as “lords of creation.”

The study of the Creator’s last great work—man, _Physiology_, comes

next in the order of our series. “Fearfully and wonderfully made,”

said the sacred writer, and every discovery of the microscope, every

analysis of the scalpel, every astute and learned study of eye, ear,

heart or brain, but repeats the declaration, “Know thyself,” urged by

one of old as a duty, but it is also a high privilege. A knowledge of

physiology and hygiene lies at the very foundation of the science of

human welfare. We are now claiming it as a mighty missionary agency in

the conversion of the heathen. Ah! it is a rare power to know one’s own

make-up and limitations, to the end that the free spirit may do its

best. Then again, every one must some day stand where this knowledge

will be useful to others; and what higher aim have we than to enrich

others with our own knowledge? One can be miserly with his ideas as

with his money. Helping with useful knowledge is of that giving which

does not impoverish.

Doubtless to cover so wide a field we shall have to study carefully the

fine “art of leaving out.” Some other things we must surely remember.

For example:

The Chautauquan, Vol. 03, July 1883 · 第 61 / 95 题