CHAPTER XIII.

(M552)

One of the first acts of the new king was to grant Letters Patent

absolving the City of all trespasses committed before the date of his

accession,(1026) and to offer restitution to all who had suffered at the

hands of Empson and Dudley or their agents. Empson and Dudley were

themselves committed to the Tower and afterwards executed. In the meantime

an enquiry was opened in the city as to recent proceedings against Capel

and others.

It was found that six men, whose names were John Derby, _alias_ Wright, a

bowyer, Richard Smyth, a carpenter, William Sympson, a fuller, Henry

Stokton, a fishmonger, Thomas Yong, a saddler, and Robert Jakes, a

shearman--all of whom had more than once been convicted of perjury, and on

that account been struck off inquests--had contrived to get themselves

replaced on the panel, and had been the chief movers in the recent actions

against the late mayor and other officers of the city. They had, moreover,

taken bribes for concealment of offences of forestalling and regrating.

Being found guilty, on their own confession, of having brought false

charges against many of the aldermen, the Court of Common Council adjudged

the whole of the accused to be disfranchised. Three of them, who were

found more guilty than the rest, were sentenced to be taken from prison on

the next market day, on horseback, without saddles, and with their faces

turned towards the horses' tails, to the pillory on Cornhill. There they

were to be set "their heddes in the holys" until proclamation of their

crime and sentence was read. The lesser offenders were spared the pillory,

but were condemned to attend on horseback at Cornhill, whence all the

offenders were conducted to the Standard in Fleet Street "by the most high

ways," where the proclamation was again read. The culprits were then taken

back to prison and made to abjure the city on pain of imprisonment at the

pleasure of the mayor and aldermen.(1027) Among the charges brought

against Derby was one to the effect that being on a jury he had received

the sum of ten shillings and "a quarter of ffisshe for his howsehold," a

bribe which a suitor had tendered by the advice and counsel of Thomas

Yong, saddler, who was apparently acting as Derby's accomplice.(1028)

(M553)

On the occasion of the king's coronation, which took place on

Midsummer-day soon after his marriage with Catherine of Aragon, his

brother's widow, the citizens presented the king and queen with the sum of

L1,000 or 1,500 marks. Two-thirds of the gift was given expressly to the

king, the remaining one-third being a tribute of respect to the queen. The

money was to be raised in the city by way of a fifteenth, but the poor

were not to be assessed.(1029) The procession from the Tower to

Westminster was equal to, if it did not surpass, any spectacle that had

yet been witnessed in the city for its gorgeousness and pomp. The streets

were railed and barred from Gracechurch Street to Cheapside at the expense

of the livery companies who lined the way,(1030) "beginning with base and

meane occupations and so ascending to the worshipful crafts." The

Goldsmiths of London were especially conspicuous for their marks of

loyalty on that day. Their stalls, which were situate by the Old Change at

the west end of Chepe, were occupied by fair maidens dressed in white and

holding tapers of white wax, whilst priests in their robes stood by with

censers of silver and incensed the king and queen as they passed.(1031)

(M554)

After three years of indolent and luxurious ease Henry became embroiled in

continental troubles. In 1511 a holy league had been formed for the

purpose of driving the French out of the Milanese, and Henry's

co-operation was desired. A parliament was summoned to meet early in the

following year.(1032) After granting supplies(1033) it unanimously agreed

that war should be proclaimed against France. The campaign of 1512 ended

ingloriously, and the French king threatened to turn the tables on Henry

and to invade England. Henry rose to the occasion and at once set about

strengthening his navy. On the 30th January, 1513, he addressed a letter

to the Corporation of London desiring them to furnish him with 300 men,

the same to be at Greenwich by the 15th February at the latest.(1034)

Proclamation was thereupon made in the city for all persons who were

prepared to join the war to appear at the Guildhall any time before the

10th February, where, if approved, they would be furnished with sufficient

harness and weapons, without any charge, and also with sufficient wages at

the king's cost.(1035)

The city was suffering at the time from great scarcity of wheat, and each

alderman was called upon to contribute the sum of L5 towards alleviating

the distress which prevailed. A contract was made with certain Hanse

merchants to furnish the city with 2,000 quarters of wheat and rye

respectively by Midsummer-day, whilst the royal purveyors were forbidden

to lay hands on wheat, malt or grain entering the port of London.(1036)

Under the circumstances it could have been no great hardship, but rather

an advantage to rid the city of 300 mouths. On the 1st February, 1513, the

aldermen were instructed to enquire in their respective wards as to the

number of men each ward could furnish, and two days later the livery

companies were ordered to find the sum of L300 to defray the expense

connected with fitting out the men. If more than L300 were needed they

were to draw on the Chamber, but any money not expended out of that sum

was to be paid into the Chamber.(1037) The companies raised the sum of

L405, the Mercers contributing L35, the Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers and

Goldsmiths respectively L30, and the rest sums of smaller amount.(1038)

There was some difference of opinion as to the nature of the uniform to be

worn by the city's contingent. At length it was settled that the soldiers'

coats should be white, with a St. George's cross and sword, together with

a rose, at the back and the same before. Their shoes were to be left to

the discretion of the muster-masters.(1039)

(M555)

Henry himself now crossed over to France. The campaign proved more

successful than the last, for the French being attacked at Guinegate, were

seized with so great a panic that Henry achieved a bloodless victory. From

the hasty flight of the French cavalry, the engagement came to be known as

the Battle of Spurs. This victory secured the fall of Terouenne and was

followed shortly afterwards by the capture of Tournay.

(M556)

Notwithstanding these successes, however, Henry found it necessary to make

peace in the following year. His allies had got what they wanted, and the

conquest of France was as far off as ever. It remained only to make as

good a bargain as he could. The French king consented to the payment of a

large sum of money, in return for which he was given Henry's sister Mary

in marriage, although she was already affianced, if not married, to Prince

Charles of Castile. This was the work of the king's new minister, Wolsey.

(M557)

To the apostles of the New Learning--as the revival of letters which

commenced in the last reign came to be called--to Erasmus, to Archbishop

Warham, to More and to Colet, the war at its outset had been eminently

distasteful. With the accession of Henry VIII to the throne they had hoped

for better things. War was to be for ever banished and a "new order" was

to prevail.

(M558)

Of its connection with More and Colet the City is justly proud. At the

opening of Henry's reign the future lord chancellor was executing the

duties of the comparatively unimportant post of under-sheriff or judge of

the Poultry Compter, a post which he continued to hold until 1517.(1040)

He had received his education in the city at St. Antony's School in

Threadneedle Street, a school which had already achieved a great

reputation and afterwards reckoned among its pupils the famous Whitgift.

Later in life he shut himself up for four years in the Charterhouse of

London, living a life of devotion and prayer, but without taking any

vow.(1041)

(M559)

The father of John Colet, Dean of St. Paul's, had taken an active part in

municipal life. Henry Colet had been alderman first of Farringdon Ward

Without and afterwards of the Wards of Castle Baynard and Cornhill,(1042)

and as alderman of the last mentioned ward he had died towards the close

of 1505. He had served as sheriff in 1477 and as mayor in 1486.

(M560)

Up to the time of Henry VI education had been carried on in the city

chiefly by means of schools attached to the various city churches and

religious houses. By order of Henry VI, and at the instigation of four

city ministers,(1043) grammar schools were established in several

parishes. The school of St. Antony attached to the hospital of the same

name, of which Dr. John Carpenter was at the time master, received an

endowment from Henry VI for the maintenance of scholars at Oxford. The

school continued to flourish some time after the dissolution of the

hospital. There was also a school attached to the hospital of St. Thomas

of Acon, as famous in its day as that of St. Antony, but of which little

is known until after the suppression of the religious houses by Henry

VIII, when it passed into the hands of the Mercers' Company and became

known, as it is to this day, as the Mercers' School.

(M561)

The Dr. John Carpenter just mentioned must not be confounded with the Town

Clerk of that name, the compiler of the famous _Liber Albus_ and the

founder of the City of London School. There is little known of the

foundation of this latter school beyond the statement made by Stow a

century and a-half later, that he "gave tenements to the city for the

finding and bringing up of four poor men's children with meat, drink,

apparel, learning at the schools in the universities, etc., until they be

preferred, and then others in their places for ever."(1044) Within the

last few years the City Chamberlain's accounts--touching "the lands of Mr.

John Carpenter, sometyme commen clarke of this cittie"--have been brought

to light, and serve to supplement in a small way Stow's meagre but

valuable statement. The rental or amount with which the Chamberlain

charged himself for the year 1565 or 1566 is there set down as L41 0_s._

4_d._, and the discharge--embracing a quit rent due to the Dean and Chapter

of Westminster, and expenses incurred in overseeing, clothing and feeding

four poor children "being founde at scoole and lerning by the bequeste of

the sayde Master Carpenter"--amounted to L19 12_s._ 8_d._, leaving a

balance to the City of L21 7_s._ 8_d._(1045) From so modest a beginning

arose the school which, situate on the Thames Embankment, now numbers over

700 scholars.

(M562)

There was a school attached to St. Paul's long before Colet's day, just as

there is one now, independent of the school of Colet's foundation, and

devoted mainly to the instruction of the Cathedral choristers. Soon after

Colet's appointment to the Deanery in 1505 he experienced no little

dissatisfaction with the Cathedral School, where great laxity prevailed,

more especially in the religious education of the "children of Paul's,"

and so, about the year 1509--the year of Henry's accession--having recently

come into a considerable estate by the death of his father, he set about

acquiring a small property situate at the east end of St. Paul's Church

for the purpose of establishing another school which would better realise

his own ideal of what a school should be than the existing Cathedral

School. Colet's School grew apace. In 1511 he was in negotiation with the

Court of Aldermen for the purchase "of a certen grounde of the citie for

an entre to be hadde into his new gramer scole."(1046) By January of the

next year (1512) he had succeeded in obtaining the assent both of the

Court of Aldermen and Common Council to the purchase by him of a "certen

grounde in the Olde Chaunge for the inlargyng of his gramer scole in

Powly's Churcheyerd" for the sum of L30.(1047) The property was conveyed

to him by deed, dated the 27th September, which deed was sealed with the

common seal on the 7th October following.(1048) The question as to whom he

should entrust the management of his school caused Colet no little

anxiety. He eventually decided to confide its revenues and management

entirely to the Mercers' Company, and when asked the reason for his so

doing replied that "though there was nothing certain in human affairs he

yet found the least corruption in them."(1049)

Considerable rivalry existed among the various grammar schools of the

city, more especially between the boys of Colet's School and the boys of

the more ancient foundation of St. Antony, which, for a long time, had the

reputation for turning out the best scholars. Public disputations were

held in the open air. The St. Paul's boys meeting St. Antony's boys would

derisively call them St. Antony's pigs, that saint being generally

represented with a pig following him, and challenge them to a disputation;

the latter would retaliate by styling their rivals "pigeons of St.

Paul's," from the bird which then, as now, frequented St. Paul's

Churchyard. From questions of grammar, writes Stow,(1050) they usually

fell to blows "with their satchels full of books, many times in great

heaps, that they troubled the streets and passengers." After the decay of

St. Antony's School the rivalry was taken up, but in a more friendly way,

by the later foundation of the Merchant Taylors' School.

(M563)

But the citizens of London did not limit their efforts in the cause of

education to their own city. Throughout the country there are to be found

grammar schools which owe their establishment to the liberal-mindedness

and open-handed generosity of the city merchant.(1051) Their existence

bears testimony to the kindly feeling which men who had grown rich in

London still bore to the provincial town or village which gave them birth

and which they had left in early life to seek their fortune in the great

metropolis.

To take but a few instances: Sir John Percival, a merchant-tailor, who in

1487 filled the subordinate office of Lord Mayor's carver, performing his

duties so well that the mayor, Sir Henry Colet, nominated him one of the

sheriffs for the year ensuing by the time honoured custom of drinking to

him at a public dinner, founded a school at Macclesfield. Stephen Jenyns,

another merchant-tailor, did the same thing at Wolverhampton. Sir Thomas

White, another member of the same company, founded two schools in the

provinces, one at Reading and another at Bristol, besides the College of

St. John at Oxford. Sir William Harper, yet another merchant-tailor,

established a school at Bedford.

The Mercers' Company rivalled the Merchant-Taylors' in the number of

schools established in the country through the liberality of its members.

Sir John Gresham founded one at Holt, in Norfolk; Sir Rowland Hill, an

ancestor of the originator of the Penny Postal scheme, another at Drayton,

in Shropshire; whilst schools at Horsham, in Sussex, and West Lavington,

in Wiltshire, were erected by two other mercers, Richard Collier and

William Dauntsey. There exist at the present day at least four schools

which owe their foundation to wealthy members of the Grocers' Company, the

well known school at Oundle, co. Northampton, upon which the Company have

expended on capital account the sum of L35,000, having been founded by Sir

William Laxton; another at Sevenoaks, in Kent, by William Sevenoke, a

native of the place, who rose from very humble circumstances to the chief

magistracy of the city; another at Witney, in Oxfordshire, by Henry Box,

and another at Colwall, co. Hereford, by Humphry Walwyn. Sir Andrew Judd,

a member of the Skinners' Company, established a school at Tonbridge,

whilst Sir Wolstan Dixie, another skinner, performed the same charitable

act at Market Bosworth. Lastly, Sir George Monoux and Thomas Russell, both

of them members of the Drapers' Company, founded schools at Walthamstow

and at Barton-under-Needwood, co. Stafford, respectively.

(M564)

On the Feast of St. Matthew (21 Sept.), 1515, a messenger arrived in the

city from Wolsey desiring the mayor and aldermen to attend that evening at

St. Paul's to return thanks to Almighty God for the queen, who was quick

with child. The summons was obeyed,(1052) and in the following February

(1516) the Princess Mary was born.

(M565)

By this time Wolsey had risen to be a great power in the State. In 1514 he

had been made Archbishop of York, and in the following year a cardinal.

His high position as a prince of the Church, as well as his authority with

the king, rendered it desirable for the citizens to keep well with him. On

the 6th March, 1516, it was resolved to send a deputation to the cardinal

for the purpose of securing his favour. No expense was to be spared in the

matter, and all costs and charges were to be paid by the Chamber.(1053) In

the following June the cardinal handed to the mayor a list of abuses in

the city which required reform. Sedition was rife there; the commons were

disobedient, the statute of apparel was ignored, vagabonds and masterless

folk resorted there and unlawful games were allowed in houses. The king's

council required an answer on these points within a few days, and an

answer was accordingly given, but the purport of it is not recorded,

although it was read to the Court of Aldermen before being

despatched.(1054)

In November of the same year (1516) the City was in difficulties with the

recently erected Court of Star Chamber, and Wolsey, who practically kept

the whole business of government in his own hands, came to the City's

assistance with advice. It appears that a subsidy was due on the 21st of

this month and the City had not paid its quota. The mayor and aldermen

were cited to appear before the cardinal and other lords of the council in

the Star Chamber at Westminster. Being asked if they had "sworne for their

assayng," to the king's subsidy, the Recorder answered on their behalf

that such procedure was contrary to Act of Parliament. The cardinal

thereupon advised them to agree to give the king L2,000 in order to be

discharged of their oaths "or ells every of theym to be sworn of and uppon

the true value of their substance within the sum of 100 marks." This took

place on Saturday, the 22nd, and the mayor and aldermen were to give an

answer to the Star Chamber by the following Wednesday. On Tuesday, the

25th, the Court of Aldermen met to consider what was best to be done under

the circumstances. The decision they arrived at was that as the present

assessment was less than the last, they would, in consideration of the

king's letters, make up the sum then payable so that it should equal the

last assessment.(1055)

(M566)

The seditious "brutes" or riots of which Wolsey had complained as daily

occurring in the city were soon to assume a serious form. They were

occasioned for the most part by the jealousy with which everybody who was

not a freeman of the city was looked upon by the free citizen. The influx

of strangers and foreigners has been daily increasing, notwithstanding the

limitations and restrictions placed upon their residence and mode of

trading,(1056) whilst the tendency of freemen had been to leave the city

for the country.(1057)

Whilst the civic authorities were doing all they could to prevent the

possibility of a disturbance arising on the coming May-day(1058)--a day

kept as a general holiday in the city--occasion was taken by a minister of

the church, whose duty it was to preach the usual Spital sermon on Easter

Tuesday (14 April), to incite the freemen to rise up against the foreigner

and stranger.(1059) When the 1st May arrived all might have been well, had

not a city alderman allowed his zeal to outrun his discretion. It happened

that John Mundy,(1060) Alderman of Queenhithe Ward, came across some

youngsters playing "at the bucklers" at a time when by a recent order they

should have been within doors, and he commanded them to desist. This they

showed no disposition to do, and when force was threatened raised the cry

for 'prentices and clubs. A large crowd quickly assembled and the alderman

had to beat a hasty retreat. The mob, now thoroughly roused, proceeded to

set free the prisoners in Newgate and the compters, and to attack the

strangers and foreigners quartered at Blanchappleton(1061) and elsewhere.

Rioting continued throughout the night, but early the following morning

they were met by a large force which the mayor in the meantime had

collected, and 300 of them were made prisoners, so that by the time that

assistance arrived from the court quiet had been restored. A commission of

Oyer and Terminer was opened at the Guildhall to try the offenders. John

Lincoln, who had not so long ago been appointed surveyor of goods bought

and sold by foreigners,(1062) was charged with being the instigator of the

riot, and being found guilty was hanged in Cheapside, whilst twelve others

were hanged on gallows in different parts of the city. Others received the

king's pardon with halters round their necks in token of the fate they

deserved.(1063)

(M567)

The civic authorities were not unnaturally anxious to make their peace

with the king, and to disclaim any complicity in the late outbreak. The

Court of Aldermen met on the 11th May to consider how best to approach his

majesty on so delicate a subject. It was decided to send a deputation to

the lord cardinal to "feel his mind" as to the number of persons that

should appear before the king. The next day eight aldermen and the

Recorder were nominated by the court "to go the Kinges grace and to knowe

his plesure when the Mayr and Aldremen and diverse of the substancyall

commoners of this citie shall sue to beseche his grace to be good and

gracious lord un to theym and to accept theym nowe beyng most sorrowful

and hevye for thees late attemptates doon ayeynst their wylles."(1064)

(M568) (M569) (M570)

The deputation forthwith proceeded, clothed in gowns of black, to

Greenwich, whither the king had gone on the 11th May. The Recorder as

usual acted as spokesman, and humbly prayed the royal forgiveness for the

negligence displayed by the mayor in not keeping the king's peace within

the city. The king in reply told them plainly his opinion that the civic

authorities had winked at the whole business, and referred them to

Cardinal Wolsey, his chancellor, who would declare to them his

pleasure.(1065) With this answer the deputation withdrew and reported what

had taken place to the mayor, who had wisely kept away. It was clear that

above all things the favour of the cardinal had to be obtained. For this

purpose a committee was appointed, whose duty it was to "devise what

thinges of plesur shalbe geven to my lord Cardynall and to other of the

lordes as they shall thynk convenient for their benevolences doon

concernyng this last Insurreccioun."(1066) By the 22nd May matters had

evidently been accommodated. On that date the king sat at Westminster Hall

in great state, surrounded by the lords of his council and attended by the

cardinal. The mayor and aldermen and chief commoners of the city, chosen

from the leading civic companies,(1067) had arrived by nine o'clock in the

morning clad in their best liveries, "according as the cardinal had

commanded them."(1068) Wolsey knew the king's weakness for theatrical

display. At Henry's command all the prisoners were brought into his

presence. They appeared, to the number of 400 men and eleven women, all

with ropes round their necks. After the cardinal had administered a rebuke

to the civic authorities for their negligence, and had declared that the

prisoners had deserved death, a formal pardon was proclaimed by the king,

the cardinal exhorting all present to loyalty and obedience. It was some

time before the effects of the late outbreak disappeared. Compensation for

losses had to be made;(1069) some were bound over to keep the peace;(1070)

and counsel were employed to draw up a statement of the points of

grievance between the citizens and merchant strangers for submission to

the king.(1071) In September there were rumours of another outbreak, but

the civic authorities were better prepared than formerly, and effectually

stopt any such attempt by putting suspected persons into prison.

Lest any unfavourable report should reach the cardinal, the Recorder and

another were ordered to ride in all haste to Sion, where Wolsey was

thought to be, and if they failed to find him there, to follow him to

Windsor and to report to him the active measures that had been taken to

prevent any further insurrection in the city.(1072) "Evil May-day" was

long remembered by the citizens, who raised objection to Thomas Semer or

Seymer, who had been sheriff at the time, being elected mayor ten years

later.(1073) In May, 1547, all householders were straitly charged not to

permit their servants any more to go maying, but to keep them within

doors.(1074)

(M571)

With gibbets all over the city, each bearing a ghastly freight, and the

summer approaching, it is scarcely surprising that the city should soon

again be visited with an epidemic. "At the city gates," wrote an

eye-witness, "one sees nothing but gibbets and the quarters of these

wretches"--the wretches who had been hanged for complicity in the late

disturbance--"so that it is horrible to pass near them."(1075) The

"sweating sickness," which had again made its appearance in 1516, and had

never really quitted the city (except for a few weeks in winter), now

raged more violently than ever, accompanied by measles and small-pox. The

king ordered all inhabitants of infected houses to keep indoors and hang

out wisps of straw, and when compelled to walk abroad to carry white

rods.(1076) This order, however, was badly received in the city and gave

rise to much murmuring and dissatisfaction.(1077) The civic authorities

did what they could to mitigate the evil by driving out beggars and

vagabonds, and removing slaughter-houses outside the city walls,(1078) as

well as by administering relief to the poorer classes by the distribution

of tokens or licences to solicit alms. These tokens consisted of round

"beedes" of white tin, bearing the City's arms in the centre, to be worn

on the right shoulder.(1079) In the midst of so much real suffering, there

were not wanting those who took advantage of the charitable feeling which

the crisis called forth and were not ashamed to gain a livelihood by

simulating illness. Such a one was Miles Rose, who on the 11th March,

1518, openly confessed before the Court of Aldermen that he had frequently

dissembled the sickness of the "fallyng evyle" (or epilepsy) in divers

parish churches in the city, on which occasions "jemewes" of silver,

called cramp rings, would as often as not be placed on his fingers by

charitable passers-by, with which he would quickly make off, pocketing at

the same time many a twopence which had been bestowed upon him.(1080)

(M572)

The city could scarcely have recovered its wonted appearance after the

ravages of the pestilence before its streets were enlivened with one of

those magnificent displays for which London became justly famous, the

occasion being an embassy from the French king sent to negotiate a

marriage treaty between Henry's daughter Mary, a child but two years of

age, and the still younger Dauphin of France. The City Records, strange to

say, appear to be altogether silent on this subject, and yet the embassy,

for magnificent display, was such as had never been seen within its walls

before. We can understand that the embassy was not acceptable to the

thrifty middle-class trading burgess, when we read that it was accompanied

by a swarm of pedlars and petty hucksters who showed an unbecoming anxiety

to do business in hats, caps and other merchandise, which under colour of

the embassy had been smuggled into the country duty free.(1081) The

foreign retail trader was at the best of times an abomination to the free

burgess, and this sharp practice on the part of the Frenchmen, coming so

soon after the recent outburst against strangers on Evil May-day, only

served to accentuate his animosity--"At this dooing mannie an Englishman

grudged, but it availed not."(1082) The ambassadors were lodged at the

Merchant Taylors' Hall, which, owing to the ill-timed action of the French

pedlars, had the look of a mart. On Sunday, the 3rd October, the king,

with a train of 1,000 mounted gentlemen richly dressed, attended by the

legates and foreign ambassadors, went in procession to St. Paul's to hear

mass; after which the king took his oath--a ceremonial which the French

admiral declared to be "too magnificent for description." On the following

Tuesday (5 Oct.) the marriage ceremony--so far as it could be carried out

between such infants--was celebrated at Greenwich, and a tiny gold ring, in

which was a valuable diamond, placed upon Mary's finger.(1083)

(M573)

In the following year (July, 1519) the streets witnessed another scene of

gaiety. This time it was a visit of the legate, Cardinal Campeggio, for

which the civic authorities made great preparations.(1084) In the first

place the mayor and aldermen, in their gowns and cloaks of scarlet, were

ordered to take up their position at 9 o'clock on the morning of Relic

Sunday (_i.e._, the third Sunday after Midsummer Day) at St. Paul's stairs

(_the stayers w__t__in poulys_). Next to them were to stand the Skinners,

then the Mercers and other worshipful crafts in their order, clothed in

their last and best livery. In this manner the street was to be lined on

either side from the west door of St. Paul's down to Baynard's Castle.

Upon the arrival of the lord cardinal and other lords at the Cathedral the

mayor and aldermen were to head the procession and seat themselves in the

choir to hear _Te Deum_ sung. Bonfires or "pryncypall fyres" were to be

lighted at St. Magnus corner, Gracechurch, Leadenhall, the conduit on

Cornhill, St. Thomas "of Acres," the Standard and little conduit in Cheap,

the Standard in Fleet Street, and in Bishopsgate Street; whilst cresset

lights and small fires "made after the manner of Midsummer-night" were to

add to the gaiety of the scene. Men-at-arms, well harnessed and

apparelled, were to keep certain streets, whilst the aldermen and their

constables were to keep watch and ward in their best array of harness. The

ambassadors, who were to be lodged in Cornhill, were to be escorted home

at night by the aldermen with torches, and to await their commands. There

was one other, perhaps not unnecessary, direction to be followed, which

was to the effect that if by any chance the strangers should be overcome

by the hospitality of the city, or, in the words of the record--"yf eny

oversyght be wt moche drynke of the strangers"--the citizens were to "lett

theym alone and no Englishemen to medyle wt theym."

(M574) (M575)

The legate landed at Deal on the 23rd July, and by slow stages was

conducted with every mark of respect to London. His passage through the

city was associated with an episode of a decidedly comic character if we

are to believe the chronicler. A story is told(1085) that the night before

Campeggio entered London, Wolsey sent him twelve mules with (empty)

coffers, in order to give a semblance of wealth to the legate and his

retinue. In Cheapside one of the mules turned restive and upset the

chests, out of which tumbled old hose, shoes, bread, meat, and eggs, with

"muche vile baggage," at which the street boys cried "See, see my lord

legate's treasure!" The story, however, is on good authority deemed more

malicious than probable.

(M576)

In January, 1519, the Emperor Maximilian died and left the imperial crown

to be contested for by the kings of France and Spain. It eventually fell

to the latter, and Charles V of Spain was elected Emperor Charles I, the

event being celebrated by a solemn mass and _Te Deum_ at St. Paul's,

followed by a banquet at Castle Baynard.(1086)

(M577)

Both France and Germany were eager to secure the co-operation of Henry.

Charles anticipated the meeting which was to take place between Henry and

Francis on the famous Field of the Cloth of Gold by coming over in person

to England (May, 1519) and having a private conference with his uncle. The

young emperor did not visit the city on this occasion; but in 1522, when

war had broken out between him and Francis and he was again in England, he

was escorted to the city with great honour and handsomely lodged in the

palace of Bridewell. Nearly L1,000 was raised to meet the expenses of his

reception and of furnishing a body of 100 bowmen for the king's

service.(1087)

The king and his guest and ally were met at St. George's Bar in Southwark

by John Melborne,(1088) the mayor, accompanied by the high officers of the

city, clothed in gowns of "pewke," each with a chain of gold about his

neck.(1089) A "proposicioun" or address was made by Sir Thomas More, now

under-treasurer of England, who was afterwards presented by the City with

the sum of L10 towards a velvet gown,(1090) whilst other speeches made in

the course of the procession were composed by Master Lilly,(1091) of

Euphues fame, the first high master of Colet's School.

(M578)

Between the first and second visits of the emperor the citizens had

witnessed some strange sights and had gone through much suffering and

privation. The city had scarcely ever been free from sickness, and famine

and pestilence had followed one another in quick succession. In September,

1520, the fellowships or civic companies subscribed over L1,000 for the

purchase of wheat(1092) to be stored at the Bridgehouse, where ovens were

fitted up.(1093) Mills for grinding corn already existed in the Thames

hard by.(1094) The following year the plague raged to such an extent that

every house attacked was ordered to be marked with St. Antony's cross,

"otherwise called the syne of Tav,"(1095) and citizens were forbidden to

attend the fair at Windsor for fear of carrying infection to the

court.(1096)

Again a scarcity of corn was feared, and the Bridge-masters were

authorised by the Court of Common Council to purchase provisions, the

corporation undertaking to give security for the repayment of all monies

advanced by the charitably disposed for the purpose of staving off

famine.(1097) Early in 1522 (15 Jan.) died Fitz-James, Bishop of London,

carried off with many others by "a great death in London and other places

of the realm."(1098)

(M579)

The citizens had also in the meanwhile witnessed the arrest and execution

of the Duke of Buckingham, son of the duke who figured so prominently

before the citizens when the crown was offered to Richard III at Baynard

Castle. He was seized one day whilst landing from his barge at the Hay

Wharf, on a number of charges all more or less frivolous. His attendants

were dismissed to the duke's "Manor of the Rose," in the parish of St.

Laurence Pountney(1099)--on the site of which recently stood Merchant

Taylors' School--whilst he himself was conducted to the Tower (16 April,

1521). An indictment was laid against him at the Guildhall before Sir

John Brugge, lord mayor, and others (8 May). After a trial at Westminster

which lasted some days, he was found guilty of high treason, and condemned

to be hanged, drawn and quartered, and to suffer such other atrocities as

usually accompanied the death of a traitor in those days. The king,

however, satisfied with his condemnation, spared him these indignities,

and the duke was allowed to meet his death at the block. His corpse was

reverently carried from the Tower to the Church of the Austin Friars by

six poor members of that Order.(1100)

The duke had other friends in the city besides these poor religious men,

who thus requited in the only way they could many acts of kindness done to

their Order by Buckingham in his life time, and his death gave rise to

much disaffection and seditious language for some time afterwards.(1101)

(M580)

Before the emperor left England he succeeded in committing Henry to an

invasion of France. In order to carry out his object the king needed

money, and the City was asked to furnish him with the sum of

L100,000.(1102) Ten days later (26 May) the City agreed to advance

L20,000. The livery companies were to be called upon to surrender their

plate, and foreigners as well as citizens were to be made to

contribute.(1103)

(M581)

The question arose whether the aldermen should be jointly assessed with

the commoners or by themselves. The mayor and aldermen were willing to

contribute the sum of L3,000,(1104) but this offer the Common Council

"nothyng regarded," but sent the common sergeant to talk the matter over

with them. After long consultation the mayor and aldermen sent back word

that it was more "convenient" that they should be assessed with the

commoners and not to be severed.(1105)

In the meantime a hasty valuation had been made by the command of Wolsey

of the plate of the livery companies, and of the ready money lying in

their halls, the whole value of which was estimated to be L4,000. This,

together with the sum of L10,000 which the Court of Aldermen purposed

raising among the wealthier class of citizens, was all that the cardinal

was given to expect from the City.(1106) On the 24th May the deputation,

which had ridden with all speed after the cardinal in order to make this

report, returned to the city and reported to the Court of Aldermen that

his grace was in no wise satisfied with the City's offer, and that he

expected the City to furnish the king with at least L30,000, of which

L10,000 was to be ready within three days.(1107) The matter was

compromised by the City consenting to advance L20,000.

In June the Recorder had an interview with Wolsey respecting the security

to be given for repayment of the loan. The cardinal refused to allow that

certain abbots, abbesses and priors, who had been named, should enter into

bond, and the citizens were obliged to be content with the personal

securities of the king and Wolsey himself. Touching the plate of the

halls, the cardinal wished only to take it in case of absolute necessity,

and then only at a fair price. He desired the owners to bring it to the

Tower, "there to be coyned and they [_i.e._, the government] to pay the

seyd money that so shalbe coyned." The result of the Recorder's interview

was reported to the Court of Aldermen the 17th June.(1108) A committee had

already (2 June) to take an account of the plate brought in and to enter

its true weight in a book.(1109)

(M582) (M583)

The recent loan of L20,000 had scarcely been raised(1110) before the

citizens found it necessary to make a further advance of 4,000 marks.

Their liberality was repaid by a gracious letter from Wolsey himself, in

which he promised to see the money repaid in a fortnight,(1111) and to

extend to them his favour. What vexed the citizens more than anything was

being compelled to make oath before the cardinal's deputy sitting in the

Chapter House of St. Paul's as to the amount each was worth in money,

plate, jewels, household goods and merchandise,--a system of inquisition

recently introduced.(1112)

(M584) (M585)

As if all this were not enough Wolsey demanded another loan before the end

of the year. This was too much even for the patient and open-handed London

burgess. The Common Council determined (4 Nov.) to put a stop to these

extortionate demands, and resolved that, "As touchyng the Requeste made by

my lorde cardynalles grace for appreste or aloone of more money to the

kynges grace, they can in no wise agre thereto, but they ar and wilbe well

contendid to be examyned uppon their othes yf it shall please his grace so

to do."(1113) The stand thus made by the citizens against illegal

exactions gave courage to others. The king's commissioners were forcibly

driven out of Kent, and open rebellion was threatened in other

counties.(1114)

(M586)

There was only one course left open to Henry, and that was to summon a

parliament. For nearly eight years no parliament had sat. It was now

summoned to meet on the 15th April, 1523, not at Westminster, but at the

house of the Blackfriars.(1115) The names of the city's representatives

are on record. The aldermen elected one of their body, George Monoux, and

with him was associated "according to ancient customs," the city's

Recorder, William Shelley; whilst the commons elected John Hewster, a

mercer, and William Roche, a draper(1116)

A few days after the election a committee of fourteen members was

nominated to consider what matters should be laid before parliament as

being for the welfare of the city.(1117) Sir Thomas More was chosen

Speaker. The enormous sum of L800,000 was demanded. Expecting some

hesitation on the part of the Commons, Wolsey himself determined to argue

with them, and suddenly made his appearance in state. Finding that his

speech was received in grim silence, he turned to More for a reply. The

Speaker, falling on his knees, declared his inability to make any answer

until he had received the instructions of the House, and intimated that

perhaps the silence of the Commons was due to the cardinal's presence.

Wolsey accordingly departed discomforted.(1118) His attempt to overawe

parliament marks the beginning of his downfall. He still kept well with

the city, however, and rendered it several small services.

(M587)

Emboldened by their recent success the citizens determined to make a stand

against other exactions, and when in May, 1523, another demand was made

for one hundred bowmen, as in the previous year, they sent their charter

to the cardinal and begged that the article touching citizens not being

liable to foreign service might remain in force. A similar demand was made

in the following November, and again the assistance of Wolsey was called

in.(1119) The City on the other hand had recently conferred a favour on

the cardinal by discharging Robert Amadas, his own goldsmith, from serving

as alderman when elected in March of this year.(1120)

(M588)

In June the king and queen of Denmark paid a visit to the city and

attended mass at St. Paul's,(1121) when the Court of Aldermen made them a

present of two hogsheads of wine, one of white and another of claret, and

two "awmes" of Rhenish wine, two fresh salmon, a dozen great pike, four

dozen of "torchettes," and eight dozen of "syses."(1122)

(M589)

The joint attack of Henry and the emperor against France in 1523 proved as

great a failure as that of 1522. In the midst of the campaign Henry was

threatened with danger nearer home. The Scots marched southward, and

created such a panic in the city that a solemn procession, in which

figured Cuthbert Tunstal, Bishop of London (successor to the unfortunate

Fitz-James), the mayor and aldermen, all the king's justices, and all the

sergeants-at-law, took place every day for a week.(1123) After a futile

attack upon Wark Castle the invaders withdrew and all danger was

over.(1124)

(M590)

When the Feast of St. Edward (13 Oct.) came round, George Monoux, alderman

and draper, who had already (1514-15) once filled the office of mayor of

the city, was re-elected; but refusing to accept the call of his

fellow-citizens he was fined L1,000. It was thereupon declared by the

Court of Aldermen that anyone who in future should be elected mayor, and

refused to take up office, should be mulcted in a like sum.(1125) Monoux's

fine was remitted the following year, and he was discharged from

attendance, although keeping his aldermanry, on account of ill health. In

return for this favour he made over to the Corporation his brewhouse

situate near the Bridgehouse in Southwark.(1126)

(M591)

Before the close of the year (3 Dec., 1523) the king pledged himself by

letters patent to repay the loan of L20,000 which the City had advanced

for his defence of the realm and maintenance of the wars against France

and Scotland.(1127)

(M592)

The disappointment experienced by Wolsey in not being selected to fill the

Papal chair on the death of Adrian VI induced him to take measures for

transferring his master's power from the imperial court to the court of

France. In the meantime a league was formed between Henry, the emperor,

and Charles, Duke of Bourbon, for the conquest and partition of France.

During the formation of this league some correspondence between England

and the Continent appears to have been lost in a remarkable manner, to

judge from the following proclamation,(1128) made the 10th July, 1524:--

(M593)

_"My lorde the maire streitly chargith and commaundith on the king

or soveraigne lordis behalf that if any maner of person or persons

that have founde a hat with certeyn lettres and other billes and

writinges therin enclosed which lettres been directed to o__r__

said soveraigne lorde from the parties of beyond the see let hym

or theym bryng the said hat lettres and writinges unto my said

lorde the maire in all the hast possible and they shalbe well

rewarded for their labour and that no maner of person kepe the

said hat lettres and writinges nor noon of them after this

proclamacioun made uppon payn of deth and God save the king."_

(M594) (M595)

The news of the defeat and capture of the French king at Pavia (24 Feb.,

1525) was hailed by Henry with great delight. The crown of France was now,

he thought, within his grasp. On Saturday, the 11th March, a triumph was

made in the city to celebrate "the takynge of the Frenche kyng in Bataill

by Themporer and his alies."(1129) Bonfires were lighted at different

places, one being in Saint Paul's Churchyard near the house where lay the

foreign ambassadors. The Chamberlain was ordered to provide a hogshead of

wine at every fire. The city minstrels filled the air with music, and the

parish clerks attended with their singing children, who sat about the

bonfires and sang ballads and "other delectable and joyfull songs." On the

Sunday following the king and queen and officers of state attended a _Te

Deum_ at St. Paul's, the legate himself pronouncing the benediction.(1130)

(M596)

Henry's first impulse was to take advantage of the French king's

misfortune; the cardinal, on the other hand, saw danger in the

predominating influence of Charles in Europe, and would gladly have seen

his master join hands with Francis against the emperor. He was

nevertheless bound to carry out the king's wishes as if they were his own,

and money was necessary for the purpose. Instead of resorting to a

benevolence--a mode of raising money already declared by parliament to be

illegal--he suggested that the people should be asked for what was called

an Amicable Loan, on the old feudal ground that the king was about to lead

an expedition in person. The citizens were among the first to whom Wolsey

made application. Were they of opinion, he asked, that the king should

undertake the expedition to France in person? If so, he could not go

otherwise than beseemed a prince, and this he could not do without the

city's aid. The sum they were asked to subscribe did not, he said, amount

to half their substance, which the king might very well have demanded.

When it was objected that trade had been bad, Wolsey lost his temper and

declared that it was better that some citizens should suffer rather than

that the king should be in want, and that if they refused to pay it might

"fortune to cost some their heddes."(1131) At length the citizens agreed

to grant the king a sixth part of their substance, which Henry graciously

acknowledged by letter (25 April),(1132) saying that it was not his wish

to overburden them, for he valued their prosperity more than ten such

realms as France. The letter was read, by Wolsey's express wish, to the

Common Council on the 28th, when it was agreed to ask for a fortnight's

grace before sending an answer to so important a missive.(1133) A

deputation was forthwith despatched to Hampton Court to solicit the

cardinal's mediation, but not being able to obtain an interview they

returned, and steps were taken to raise the money required.

When the cardinal was informed later on that the alderman of each ward was

holding an enquiry as to the means of the inhabitants he affected to be

very angry. "They had no right to examine anyone," he said; "I am your

commissioner, I will examine you one by one myself." The mayor (Sir

William Bailey) thereupon threw himself at the cardinal's feet beseeching

him that since it was by Act of Common Council that the aldermen had sat

in their respective wards for the purpose of taking the benevolence--a

procedure which he now perceived to be against the law--the Act should by

the Common Council be revoked. "Well," said Wolsey "I am content," and he

then proceeded to ask how much the mayor and aldermen then present were

prepared to give. When the mayor incautiously remarked that if he made any

promise there and then it might perhaps cost him his life, Wolsey again

became furious. What! the mayor's life threatened for obeying the king's

orders! He would see to that.

In the country the loan met with so much opposition that a rebellion was

feared. At length, finding it was impossible to collect the money, Wolsey

sent (19 May) for the mayor and aldermen and informed them that the king

had given up all thoughts of his expedition to France, and that they were

pardoned of all that had been demanded of them.(1134)

(M597) (M598)

Before many weeks elapsed Wolsey saw with satisfaction a truce made

between Henry and the queen regent of France.(1135) Early in 1526 the

French king regained his liberty by virtue of a treaty which he at once

repudiated, and war between him and the emperor was renewed, but England

remained virtually at peace. In the following year (1527) the cardinal

himself paid a visit to the French king and superintended the drawing up

of articles for a permanent peace. By September all was settled, and

Wolsey returned to England. Ambassadors from France shortly afterwards

arrived, and were lodged in the Bishop of London's palace in St. Paul's

Churchyard. The City made them valuable presents at the instance of the

lord cardinal.(1136)

(M599) (M600) (M601) (M602)

The election of Paul Wythypol,(1137) a merchant-tailor, as alderman of the

Ward of Farringdon Within, in 1527, again brought Henry and the citizens

into variance. The king desired Wythypol's discharge, at least for a time.

The Court of Aldermen hesitated to accede to the request and consulted

Wolsey.(1138) He recommended them an interview with the king at Greenwich.

To Greenwich they accordingly went (24 Feb.) by water, where they arrived

in time to give a formal reception to the cardinal, who landed soon

afterwards from his barge. After a few words had passed between the

cardinal and the municipal officers, the former entered the palace, whilst

the latter waited in the king's great chamber till dinner time. When that

hour arrived they were bidden to go down to the hall, where the mayor was

entertained at the lord steward's mess, and the aldermen received like

attention from the comptroller and other officers of state. The city's

Counsel who had accompanied the mayor and aldermen were entertained at the

table of "master coferer." Dinner over, the company returned to the great

chamber, where they were kept waiting till the evening. At length the

mayor and aldermen were bidden to the king's presence in his secret

chamber. What took place there the writer of the record declares himself

unable to say,(1139) and, although the mayor afterwards made a report of

the matter to the court, no particulars are recorded in the City's

archives. The practical outcome of the interview appears to have been that

Wythypol was left unmolested for a whole twelve-month. When that time had

elapsed he was again summoned before the Court of Aldermen either to

accept office or take the oath prescribed.(1140) Refusing both these

propositions he was committed to Newgate.(1141) This took place on the 6th

February, 1528. On the 3rd March he appeared in person before the Court of

Aldermen and desired a respite from office, or to be allowed to pay a

fine. Being asked the amount of fine he was prepared to pay, he offered

L40, and at the same time asked to be discharged from office for a period

of three years. This offer was declined, and Wythypol was again ordered to

take the oath prescribed for his discharge.(1142) Nearly three months were

allowed to elapse before any further steps were taken, when, on the 22nd

May, the court again ordered Wythypol to appear at its next meeting, and

to take up office, or else take the oath, or pay such fine as should be

assessed by the mayor, aldermen and common council.(1143) It is certain

that he did not take office, so the conclusion must be that he availed

himself of one or other of the alternatives open to him. John Brown was

elected alderman of Farringdon Within shortly afterwards, but he was

discharged by the Common Council, and the aldermanry was subsequently

filled by John Hardy being translated to it from Aldersgate Ward.(1144)

(M603)

In addition to an epidemic of sickness,(1145) the city was threatened the

following year with a famine, notwithstanding the fact that large

quantities of grain had been stored up in various parts of the city by

order of the municipal authorities. The country had suffered recently by

heavy rains, and large tracts of land had been inundated. In anticipation

of trouble, a large stock of wheat had been laid in, but when it came to

the point of disposing of it, the bakers of the city and the bakers of

Stratford-at-Bow declined to take it except at their own price, until

compelled by threats and, in some cases, imprisonment.(1146)

(M604)

For some years past Henry had been meditating a divorce from Catherine of

Aragon, his brother's widow, but it was not until 1529 that the assent of

the Pope was at last obtained to try the validity of the marriage. The

legatine court sat in the city at the house of the Blackfriars, where

every arrangement was made to add dignity to the proceedings. At its head

sat the two cardinals, Campeggio and Wolsey, on chairs covered with cloth

of gold, and on their right sat Henry himself.(1147) The sudden suspension

of all proceedings after the court had sat for some weeks, and the

revocation of the cause to the Court of Rome, led to Wolsey's downfall. In

October the seals were taken from him and given to Sir Thomas More, his

furniture and plate were seized, and he himself ordered to remove from

London.

(M605)

A few days after Wolsey's disgrace a banquet was held at the Guildhall on

the occasion of the swearing in of Ralph Dodmer, the newly-elected mayor.

It is the first lord mayor's banquet of which any particulars have come

down to us, and they are interesting as recording the names of the chief

guests. The mayor's court, the scene of the feast, was boarded and hung

with cloth of Arras for the occasion. One table was set apart for peers of

the realm, at the head of which sat the new lord chancellor and at the

bottom the lords Berkeley and Powis. At either side of the table sat nine

peers, among whom were the dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, the one being the

treasurer and the other the marshal of England, Sir Thomas Grey, Marquis

of Dorset, the Earl of Oxford, high chamberlain, and the Earl of

Shrewsbury, lord steward of England, Tunstal, Bishop of London, Sir Thomas

Boleyn, Lord Rochford, whose daughter Anne was shortly to experience the

peril of sharing Henry's throne, Lord Audley, and others. At two other

tables, placed between the court of orphans and the mayor's court, were

entertained a number of knights and other gentlemen, whose names are not

recorded.(1148)

(M606)

It was not long before further proceedings were taken against the king's

late minister. On the 3rd November (1529), after the lapse of six years,

parliament met in the city at the palace of Bridewell. The City was

represented by Thomas Seymer, an alderman and ex-mayor, John Baker, the

City's Recorder, John Petyte, grocer, and Paul Wythypol,(1149) the

merchant-tailor whose election as alderman had recently created no little

trouble. Among other members was Thomas Cromwell,(1150) a friend of

Wolsey, and destined soon to take his place as the king's chief adviser. A

bill for disabling the cardinal from being restored to his former

dignities was carried by the Lords and sent down to the Commons (1 Dec.).

There it is said to have met with the strenuous opposition of Cromwell. Of

this, however, there is some doubt, as it is uncertain whether the bill

provoked any discussion, parliament being shortly afterward prorogued (17

Dec.) and the unhappy cardinal left in suspense as to what fate was in

store for him.(1151) At Christmas he fell ill, and the king's heart became

so far softened towards his old favourite that early in the following year

(Feb., 1530) he was restored to the archbishopric of York with all its

possessions except York-place (Whitehall) in Westminster, which Henry

could not bring himself to surrender. His colleges were seized; the

college he had founded at Ipswich was sold; but his college at Oxford,

known as Cardinal College, was afterwards re-established under the name of

Christ Church. He himself was not allowed to rest long in peace. He was

summoned to London on a charge of treason, for which there was little or

no foundation, but the troubles of the last two years had rendered him so

infirm that he died on the way.

London and the Kingdom - Volume 1 A History Derived Mainly from the Archives at Guildhall in the Custody of the Corporation of the City of London. · 第 13 / 20 章