However, it matters very little now, what the king of England

either says or does; he hath wickedly broken through every moral and

human obligation, trampled nature and conscience beneath his feet;

and by a steady and constitutional spirit of insolence and cruelty,

procured for himself an universal hatred. It is NOW the interest of

America to provide for herself. She hath already a large and young

family, whom it is more her duty to take care of, than to be granting

away her property, to support a power who is become a reproach to the

names of men and christians--YE, whose office it is to watch over the

morals of a nation, of whatsoever sect or denomination ye are of, as

well as ye, who, are more immediately the guardians of the public

liberty, if ye wish to preserve your native country uncontaminated by

European corruption, ye must in secret wish a separation--But leaving

the moral part to private reflection, I shall chiefly confine my

farther remarks to the following heads.

First, That it is the interest of America to be separated from

Britain.

Secondly, Which is the easiest and most practicable plan,

RECONCILIATION or INDEPENDANCE? with some occasional remarks.

In support of the first, I could, if I judged it proper, produce

the opinion of some of the ablest and most experienced men on this

continent; and whose sentiments, on that head, are not yet publicly

known. It is in reality a self-evident position: For no nation in a

state of foreign dependance, limited in its commerce, and cramped and

fettered in its legislative powers, can ever arrive at any material

eminence. America doth not yet know what opulence is; and although

the progress which she hath made stands unparalleled in the history

of other nations, it is but childhood, compared with what she would

be capable of arriving at, had she, as she ought to have, the

legislative powers in her own hands. England is, at this time,

proudly coveting what would do her no good, were she to accomplish

it; and the Continent hesitating on a matter, which will be her final

ruin if neglected. It is the commerce and not the conquest of

America, by which England is to be benefited, and that would in a

great measure continue, were the countries as independant of each

other as France and Spain; because in many articles, neither can go

to a better market. But it is the independance of this country of

Britain or any other, which is now the main and only object worthy of

contention, and which, like all other truths discovered by necessity,

will appear clearer and stronger every day.

First, Because it will come to that one time or other.

Secondly, Because, the longer it is delayed the harder it will be

to accomplish.

I have frequently amused myself both in public and private

companies, with silently remarking, the specious errors of those who

speak without reflecting. And among the many which I have heard, the

following seems most general, viz. that had this rupture happened

forty or fifty years hence, instead of NOW, the Continent would

have been more able to have shaken off the dependance. To which I

reply, that our military ability AT THIS TIME, arises from the

experience gained in the last war, and which in forty or fifty years

time, would have been totally extinct. The Continent, would not, by

that time, have had a General, or even a military officer left; and

we, or those who may succeed us, would have been as ignorant of

martial matters as the ancient Indians: And this single position,

closely attended to, will unanswerably prove, that the present time

is preferable to all others. The argument turns thus--at the

conclusion of the last war, we had experience, but wanted numbers;

and forty or fifty years hence, we should have numbers, without

experience; wherefore, the proper point of time, must be some

particular point between the two extremes, in which a sufficiency of

the former remains, and a proper increase of the latter is obtained:

And that point of time is the present time.

The reader will pardon this digression, as it does not properly

come under the head I first set out with, and to which I again return

by the following position, viz.

Should affairs be patched up with Britain, and she to remain the

governing and sovereign power of America, (which, as matters are now

circumstanced, is giving up the point intirely) we shall deprive

ourselves of the very means of sinking the debt we have, or may

contract. The value of the back lands which some of the provinces are

clandestinely deprived of, by the unjust extension of the limits of

Canada, valued only at five pounds sterling per hundred acres, amount

to upwards of twenty-five millions, Pennsylvania currency; and the

quit-rents at one penny sterling per acre, to two millions yearly.

It is by the sale of those lands that the debt may be sunk, without

burthen to any, and the quit-rent reserved thereon, will always

lessen, and in time, will wholly support the yearly expence of

government. It matters not how long the debt is in paying, so that

the lands when sold be applied to the discharge of it, and for the

execution of which, the Congress for the time being, will be the

continental trustees.

I proceed now to the second head, viz. Which is the easiest and

most practicable plan, RECONCILIATION or INDEPENDANCE; with some

occasional remarks.

He who takes nature for his guide is not easily beaten out of his

argument, and on that ground, I answer GENERALLY THAT INDEPENDANCE

BEING A SINGLE SIMPLE LINE, CONTAINED WITHIN OURSELVES; AND

RECONCILIATION, A MATTER EXCEEDINGLY PERPLEXED AND COMPLICATED, AND

IN WHICH, A TREACHEROUS CAPRICIOUS COURT IS TO INTERFERE, GIVES THE

ANSWER WITHOUT A DOUBT.

The present state of America is truly alarming to every man who is

capable of reflexion. Without law, without government, without any

other mode of power than what is founded on, and granted by courtesy.

Held together by an unexampled concurrence of sentiment, which, is

nevertheless subject to change, and which, every secret enemy is

endeavouring to dissolve. Our present condition, is, Legislation

without law; wisdom without a plan; constitution without a name; and,

what is strangely astonishing, perfect Independance contending for

dependance. The instance is without a precedent; the case never

existed before; and who can tell what may be the event? The property

of no man is secure in the present unbraced system of things. The

mind of the multitude is left at random, and seeing no fixed object

before them, they pursue such as fancy or opinion starts. Nothing is

criminal; there is no such thing as treason; wherefore, every one

thinks himself at liberty to act as he pleases. The Tories dared not

have assembled offensively, had they known that their lives, by that

act, were forfeited to the laws of the state. A line of distinction

should be drawn, between, English soldiers taken in battle, and

inhabitants of America taken in arms. The first are prisoners, but

the latter traitors. The one forfeits his liberty, the other his

head.

Notwithstanding our wisdom, there is a visible feebleness in some

of our proceedings which gives encouragement to dissentions. The

Continental Belt is too loosely buckled. And if something is not done

in time, it will be too late to do any thing, and we shall fall into

a state, in which, neither RECONCILIATION nor INDEPENDANCE will

be practicable. The king and his worthless adherents are got at their

old game of dividing the Continent, and there are not wanting among

us, Printers, who will be busy spreading specious falsehoods. The

artful and hypocritical letter which appeared a few months ago in two

of the New York papers, and likewise in two others, is an evidence

that there are men who want either judgment or honesty.

It is easy getting into holes and corners and talking of

reconciliation: But do such men seriously consider, how difficult the

task is, and how dangerous it may prove, should the Continent divide

thereon. Do they take within their view, all the various orders of

men whose situation and circumstances, as well as their own, are to

be considered therein. Do they put themselves in the place of the

sufferer whose ALL is ALREADY gone, and of the soldier, who hath

quitted ALL for the defence of his country. If their ill judged

moderation be suited to their own private situations ONLY,

regardless of others, the event will convince them, that "they are

reckoning without their Host."

Put us, say some, on the footing we were on in sixty-three: To

which I answer, the request is not NOW in the power of Britain to

comply with, neither will she propose it; but if it were, and even

should be granted, I ask, as a reasonable question, By what means is

such a corrupt and faithless court to be kept to its engagements?

Another parliament, nay, even the present, may hereafter repeal the

obligation, on the pretence, of its being violently obtained, or

unwisely granted; and in that case, Where is our redress?--No going to

law with nations; cannon are the barristers of Crowns; and the sword,

not of justice, but of war, decides the suit. To be on the footing of

sixty-three, it is not sufficient, that the laws only be put on the

same state, but, that our circumstances, likewise, be put on the same

state; Our burnt and destroyed towns repaired or built up, our

private losses made good, our public debts (contracted for defence)

discharged; otherwise, we shall be millions worse than we were at

that enviable period. Such a request, had it been complied with a

year ago, would have won the heart and soul of the Continent--but now

it is too late, "The Rubicon is passed."

Besides, the taking up arms, merely to enforce the repeal of a

pecuniary law, seems as unwarrantable by the divine law, and as

repugnant to human feelings, as the taking up arms to enforce

obedience thereto. The object, on either side, doth not justify the

means; for the lives of men are too valuable to be cast away on such

trifles. It is the violence which is done and threatened to our

persons; the destruction of our property by an armed force; the

invasion of our country by fire and sword, which conscientiously

qualifies the use of arms: And the instant, in which such a mode of

defence became necessary, all subjection to Britain ought to have

ceased; and the independancy of America, should have been considered,

as dating its era from, and published by, THE FIRST MUSKET THAT WAS

FIRED AGAINST HER. This line is a line of consistency; neither drawn

by caprice, nor extended by ambition; but produced by a chain of

events, of which the colonies were not the authors.

I shall conclude these remarks, with the following timely and well

intended hints. We ought to reflect, that there are three different

ways, by which an independancy may hereafter be effected; and that

ONE of those THREE, will one day or other, be the fate of

America, viz. By the legal voice of the people in Congress; by a

military power; or by a mob: It may not always happen that our

soldiers are citizens, and the multitude a body of reasonable men;

virtue, as I have already remarked, is not hereditary, neither is it

perpetual. Should an independancy be brought about by the first of

those means, we have every opportunity and every encouragement before

us, to form the noblest purest constitution on the face of the earth.

We have it in our power to begin the world over again. A situation,

similar to the present, hath not happened since the days of Noah

until now. The birthday of a new world is at hand, and a race of men,

perhaps as numerous as all Europe contains, are to receive their

portion of freedom from the event of a few months. The Reflexion is

awful--and in this point of view, How trifling, how ridiculous, do the

little, paltry cavellings, of a few weak or interested men appear,

when weighed against the business of a world.

Should we neglect the present favorable and inviting period, and an

Independance be hereafter effected by any other means, we must charge

the consequence to ourselves, or to those rather, whose narrow and

prejudiced souls, are habitually opposing the measure, without either

inquiring or reflecting. There are reasons to be given in support of

Independance, which men should rather privately think of, than be

publicly told of. We ought not now to be debating whether we shall be

independant or not, but, anxious to accomplish it on a firm, secure,

and honorable basis, and uneasy rather that it is not yet began upon.

Every day convinces us of its necessity. Even the Tories (if such

beings yet remain among us) should, of all men, be the most

solicitous to promote it; for, as the appointment of committees at

first, protected them from popular rage, so, a wise and well

established form of government, will be the only certain means of

continuing it securely to them. WHEREFORE, if they have not virtue

enough to be WHIGS, they ought to have prudence enough to wish for

Independance.

In short, Independance is the only BOND that can tye and keep us

together. We shall then see our object, and our ears will be legally

shut against the schemes of an intriguing, as well, as a cruel enemy.

We shall then too, be on a proper footing, to treat with Britain; for

there is reason to conclude, that the pride of that court, will be

less hurt by treating with the American states for terms of peace,

than with those, whom she denominates, "rebellious subjects," for

terms of accommodation. It is our delaying it that encourages her to

hope for conquest, and our backwardness tends only to prolong the

war. As we have, without any good effect therefrom, withheld our

trade to obtain a redress of our grievances, let us NOW try the

alternative, by INDEPENDANTLY redressing them ourselves, and then

offering to open the trade. The mercantile and reasonable part in

England, will be still with us; because, peace WITH trade, is

preferable to war WITHOUT it. And if this offer be not accepted,

other courts may be applied to.

On these grounds I rest the matter. And as no offer hath yet been

made to refute the doctrine contained in the former editions of this

pamphlet, it is a negative proof, that either the doctrine cannot be

refuted, or, that the party in favour of it are too numerous to be

opposed. WHEREFORE, instead of gazing at each other with suspicious

or doubtful curiosity, let each of us, hold out to his neighbour the

hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line, which, like

an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every former

dissention. Let the names of Whig and Tory be extinct; and let none

other be heard among us, than those of A GOOD CITIZEN, AN OPEN AND

RESOLUTE FRIEND, AND A VIRTUOUS SUPPORTER OF THE RIGHTS OF MANKIND

AND OF THE FREE AND INDEPENDANT STATES OF AMERICA.

----End of COMMON SENSE by Thomas Paine

Corrections: 55,553 replaced by 35,553

Common Sense(#3755) · 第 4 / 4 段