VII. THE BEGINNINGS OF LIFE

It is remarkable, I think, that Professor Osborn, in his "Origin and

Evolution of Life," makes no account of the micro-organisms or

unicellular lives that are older than the continents, older than the

Cambrian rocks, and that have survived unchanged even to our times. I

saw in the Grand Cañon of the Colorado where they were laid down

horizontally on the old Azoic or original rocks, as if by the hand of a

mason building the foundation of a superstructure. All the vast series

of limestone rocks are made up from the skeletons of minute living

bodies. Other strata of rocks are made up of the skeletons of diatoms.

Some of our polishing powders are made from these rocks. Formed of pure

silex, these rocks are made up of the skeletons of organisms of many

exquisite forms, _Foraminiferæ_. The Pyramids are said to be built of

rocks formed by these organisms. "No single group of the animal

kingdom," says Mr. W. B. Carpenter, "has contributed, or is at present

contributing, so largely as has the _Foraminiferæ_ to the formation of

the earth's crust." In the face of these facts, how unsatisfactory seem

Professor Osborn's statements that life probably originated on the

continents, either in the moist crevices of rocks or soils, in the fresh

waters of continental pools, or in the slightly saline waters of the

"bordering primordial seas." This last suggestion comes nearer the mark.

There is no variation during geologic time of these primordial living

organisms. All conceivable changes of environment have passed over them,

but they change not. Bacteria struggle together, one form devouring

another form. Unicellular life long precedes multicellular. Biologists

usually begin with the latter; the former are fixed; with the latter

begins development or evolution, and the peopling of the world with

myriads of animal forms.

Under the Maples · 第 74 / 87 题