TRAGEDY ON THE STAGE.

The tendency of the stage is to present practical, everyday affairs in

plays, and those are the most successful which are the most natural. The

shoeing of a horse on the stage in a play attracts the attention of the

audience wonderfully, and draws well. The inner workings of a brewery,

or a mill, is a big card, but there is hardly enough tragedy about it.

If they could run a man or two through the wheel, and have them cut up

into hash, or have them crowned in a beer vat? audiences could applaud

as they do when eight or nine persons are stabbed, poisoned or beheaded

in the Hamlets and Three Richards, where corpses are piled up on top of

each other.

What the people want is a compromise between old tragedy and new comedy.

Now, if some manager could have a love play, where the heroine goes into

a slaughter house to talk love to the butcher, instead of a blacksmith

shop or a brewery, it would take. A scene could be set for a slaughter

house, with all the paraphernalia for killing cattle, and supe butchers

to stand around the star butcher with cleavers and knives.

The star butcher could sit on a barrel of pigs' feet, or a pile of heads

and horns, and soliloquize over his unrequited love, as he sharpened

a butcher knife on his boot. The hour for slaughtering having arrived,

cattle could be driven upon the stage, the star could knock down a steer

and cut its throat, and hang it up by the hind legs and skin it, with

the audience looking on breathlessly.

As he was about to cut open the body of the dead animal, the orchestra

could suddenly break the stillness, and the heroine could waltz out from

behind a lot of dried meat hanging up at one side, dressed in a lavender

satin princess dress, _en train_, with a white reception hat with

ostrich feathers, and, wading through the Blood of the steer on the

carpet, shout, “Stay your hand, Reginald!”

The star butcher could stop, wipe his knife on his apron, motion to

the supe butchers to leave, and he would take three strides through the

blood and hair, to the side of the heroine, take her by the wrist

with his bloody hand, and shout, “What wiltest thou, Mary Anderson de

Montmorence?” Then they could sit down on a box of intestines and liver

and things and talk it over, and the curtain could go down with the

heroine swooning in the arms of the butcher.

Seven years could elapse between that act and the next, and a scene

could be laid in a boarding house, and some of the same beef could be on

the table, and all that. Of course we do not desire to go into details.

We are no play writer, but we know what takes. People have got tired of

imitation blood on the stage. They kick on seeing a man killed in one

act, and come out as good as new in the next. Any good play writer can

take the cue from this article and give the country a play that will

take the biscuit.

Imagine John McCullough, or Barrett, instead of killing Roman supes with

night gowns on, and bare legs, killing a Texas steer. There's where you

would get the worth of your money. It would make them show the metal

within them, and they would have to dance around to keep from getting a

horn in their trousers. It does not require any pluck to go out behind

the scenes with a sword and kill enough supes for a mess. Give us some

slaughter house tragedy, right away.

Peck's Sunshine Being a Collection of Articles Written for Peck's Sun, Milwaukee, Wis. - 1882 · 第 91 / 115 题