TO THE EDITOR OF ARIS’S GAZETTE.

Sir—It is with much regret that I am obliged again to come before the

public on the subject of the Testament which was burnt in London

’Prentice-street, in this town, by the Rev. W. Molloy, a Priest of

the Church of Rome, but the cause of truth demands it of me. It is

stated in the apology put forth by that Rev. Gentleman and his

coadjutors, “that the act was regretted afterwards by the Clergyman

by whom it was done, and strongly disapproved of by his brother

Clergy as soon as known,” and that it was “under the excitement of

the moment that the act, which it is not attempted to justify, was

done.”

Now Sir, I ask you, as I ask the public, are these statements

consistent with the following facts:—The Testament was burnt on

Thursday, Nov. 16, about two o’clock p.m., and it was not till the

following Saturday, about midday, that I had any conversation with

the Priest upon the subject.

Being in London ’Prentice-street on the Saturday, Mr. Molloy sent for

me to the house where he had burnt the Testament, to ask if I

supposed that the woman to whose daughter the book had been given was

a Protestant, because he had heard that I had visited her the day

before. It was upon that occasion that I enquired of him whether or

not he had burnt the Testament; he told me that he had, and would

burn every Bible and Tract he found in the houses of his people. I

warned him that I should make his words public, and he told me I was

perfectly welcome to do so. I further remember saying that I had

often been told that I had unjustly charged the Romish Priests with

denying the Bible to their people, and his reply was to this

effect—“You have stated the truth, and are perfectly welcome to state

it when you will; you are furthering our objects by doing so.” There

are several other points in the apology on which I should much like

to dwell, but I think it best simply to state facts, and leave the

public to judge for themselves whether the apology that this act was

done in the excitement of the moment can apply to Mr. Molloy, who,

after the reflection of two days, threatened to repeat the act again

and again.

Bible-Burning the substance of a sermon preached in St. Martin's Church, Birmingham, on Sunday evening, Dec. 10, 1848 · 第 12 / 13 题