CHAPTER IV

A POLICE SCARE

I left the office of the _Bomb_ towards 1 A.M., undecided whether

to weep or to laugh at what I had witnessed there. This, my first

introduction into an English Anarchist circle had certainly not been

very encouraging, but I was too deeply persuaded of the truth and

justice of the Anarchist doctrines to be deterred by such a beginning,

and I did not for one instant waver from my resolve to enter and take

part in the "movement." That some insincere and dishonest men and some

fools should also play their part in it I from the first recognised

as inevitable, but I could not see that this affected the Anarchist

principles or rendered it less necessary for those believing in them

to advocate and spread them. Dr. Armitage accompanied me part of my way

home and we talked the matter over _en route_. "Why trouble ourselves,"

he exclaimed, "about a few unprincipled men in such a wide, such a

universal movement? Our objects and ideals are too far above such

considerations to allow us to be influenced by them. Men like Myers are

but the outcome of unnatural and vitiated conditions; they are produced

by the very society which it is our object to abolish--as all manner

of disease is produced by vitiated air. With better conditions such men

will disappear; nay, the very possibility of their existence will be

gone."

"But in the meantime," I rejoined, "they are surely damaging our Cause,

and scenes like the one we have just witnessed would, if known to the

public, bring our party into ridicule and discredit."

"The Cause is too great and too high to be influenced by such men or

such scenes," answered the doctor with conviction. "Moreover it is our

duty to bring fresh blood and life into the party, so that no place will

be left to renegades of the Myers type."

And in face of Armitage's unswerving faith and optimism my moment of

disgust and perplexity passed, and I felt more than ever determined to

bring my quota of time and strength to the propagation of the Anarchist

ideals. "I have only seen a very limited and narrow circle," I said

to myself; "the field is wide, and I only know one obscure and unclean

corner of it. I cannot judge from this night's experience."

As far as the squalor of the men and their surroundings was concerned,

although it was at first something of a shock to me, I did not allow

myself to be disconcerted on its account. I had no desire or ambition to

be a mere dilettante Socialist, and as dirt and squalor had to be faced,

well, I was ready to face them. A famous Russian writer has described

a strange phase through which the Russian youth passed not many years

since, the "V. Narod" ("To the People!") movement, when young men

and girls by the thousands, some belonging to the highest classes

in society, fled from their families, tore themselves free from all

domestic and conventional yokes, persuaded that it was their duty to

serve the cause of the masses, and that in no way could they better

accomplish this object than by settling in the people's midst, living

their life, taking part in their work. I was passing through a similar

phase of mental evolution.

I felt a strong desire to free myself from all the ideas, customs, and

prejudices which usually influence my class, to throw myself into the

life and the work of the masses. Thus it was that I worked hard to learn

how to compose and print, that I might be of use to the Cause in the

most practical manner of all--the actual production of its literature.

Thus it was also that I resolutely hardened myself against any

instinctive sentiments of repulsion which the unclean and squalid

surroundings of the people might raise in me. I remember reading an

article by Tolstoi which appeared in the English press, dealing with

the conditions of the Russian _moujik_, in which he clearly and

uncompromisingly stated that in order to tackle the social problem, it

is necessary to tackle dirt and vermin with it. If you desire to reach

your _moujik_ you must reach him _à travers_ his dirt and his parasites:

if you are disinclined to face these, then leave your _moujik_ alone. It

was in fact a case of "take me, take my squalor." I determined to take

both.

Dr. Armitage left me at the corner of Oxford Circus, but before I had

taken many steps farther, I heard him suddenly turn round, and in an

instant he had come up with me again.

"By the way, Isabel," he exclaimed, "I was quite forgetting to mention

something I had done, to which I trust you will not object. You know

how full up my place is just now with hard-up comrades. Well I took the

liberty to send on to you a young Scotchman, I forget his name, who

has just tramped up from the North; a most interesting fellow, rather

taciturn, but with doubtless a good deal in him. He had nowhere to pass

the night, poor chap, and no money, so I told him that if he waited on

your doorstep some time after midnight you would be certain to give him

a night's lodgings when you returned. Did I do right?" and the doctor's

kindly face beamed with the look of a man who expected approbation.

"Ye--es," I gasped out, somewhat taken aback, "quite right, of course;"

for I felt that any hesitation would be feeble, a mere relic of

bourgeois prejudice.

And, sure enough, on reaching my domicile, I found installed on the

doorstep a most uncouth and villainous-looking tramp. Taciturn he

certainly was, for he scarcely opened his mouth to say "Good-evening,"

and indeed during the three days of his residence with me he hardly

ever articulated a sound. As I was getting out my latch-key the local

policeman chanced to pass: "That fellow has been hanging about for the

last hours, miss," he said to me. "Shall I remove him for you?"

"Certainly not," I replied firmly, and opening the door, I requested

my unknown comrade to enter. I can still see in my mind's eye that

constable's face. It looked unutterable things.

After conducting the tramp to the pantry, and letting him loose on a

cold pigeon-pie and other viands, and finally installing him on the

study sofa, I retired to my own apartment, well prepared to enjoy a good

night's rest.

This was destined, however, to be of short duration. Towards 6.30 I was

roused from sleep by a loud rat-tat at the front door and, the servants

not being up at such an hour, and suspecting that this early visit

was in some way connected with the Anarchists, I hastily slipped on a

wrapper and ran downstairs.

On opening the door I found one of the members of the previous night's

meeting, the taciturn hero of the potato tragedy.

"It's rather early to disturb you," he began, "but I came to let you

know that last night, after you had all gone, Comrades Banter and

O'Flynn were arrested."

"Arrested!" I exclaimed, as yet unused to such incidents; "why, what on

earth are they charged with?"

"Well," answered Carter, "the charge is not yet very clear, but so

far as we can understand, it is in some way connected with the Myers

business. They are charged with manufacturing explosives, or something

of the sort. The fact is, the police and Jacob Myers are at the bottom

of the whole matter, and Banter, O'Flynn, and Augustin have all played

into their hands."

"Come in here," I interrupted, leading the way to the dining-room. "Let

us sit down and talk the matter over together;" and we entered, Carter

casting a distinctly disapprobatory glance at the "bourgeois luxury" of

this apartment.

As soon as we were seated my companion returned to the question of the

moment. "I fear," he said, "that it is rather a serious affair for the

comrades. That Myers is a police emissary there can no longer be any

reasonable doubt, and the death of his brother is clear proof that he

has not been wasting his time lately. And it is only too likely that

the same hand which provided Augustin with explosives may have placed

similar material in the possession of Banter and O'Flynn."

"How abominable!" I exclaimed indignantly.

"Yes, but Anarchists should not be stupid enough to take any one into

their confidence in such matters," returned Carter. "It is merely

encouraging _mouchards_ and police plots. However, the question now

is--What can be done to help the comrades out of the mess?"

"I am willing to do my best," I answered; "only tell me how I can be of

use."

"You can be of great use, if you care to be," answered Carter. "A

barrister must be procured to defend them, witnesses must be found,

money procured (and here he cast a side-glance at my plate), and some

one ought to interview the comrades in Holloway, and take some food to

the poor fellows."

"I am quite willing to do my best in all these matters," I answered

enthusiastically.

Carter stayed some little while longer instructing me in the various

things I was to do, and then left me, retiring presumably to his double

bed again, for I saw no more of him till long after the trial was over.

He had handed the work over to me, and doubtless felt that so far as he

was personally concerned his responsibilities were at an end.

As soon as the morning papers arrived I scanned them eagerly and from

them learned further particulars of the arrest. A widespread conspiracy

was suspected, the object of which was to blow up the West End of

London, and leaders were devoted to the denunciation of the Anarchists

and their infamous teachings. Explosives, it was alleged, had been found

in the possession of the arrested men, "evidently destined to carry

into effect the deadly work which was only stopped by the hand of God in

Queen's Park three weeks ago."

Having disposed of a hasty breakfast, I left the house, and my morning

was spent in places which were new and strange to me--Holloway Jail,

the Old Jewry, and the Middle Temple. Holloway Prison was my first

destination, for before any other steps could be taken it was necessary

to ascertain what views the prisoners themselves held as to the course

to be adopted in their defence.

I awaited my turn in the prison waiting-room along with a motley crowd

of other visitors--burglars' and forgers' wives, pickpockets' mates, and

the mother of a notorious murderer among others. Their language was not

very choice when addressing the jailers, but sympathetic enough when

talking among themselves and inquiring of one another, "What's your man

up for?" or, "How did your mate get copped?" I felt painfully conscious

of the tameness of my reply: "It's a friend: incitement to murder." How

far more respectable murder itself would have sounded in the midst of

such superior crime!

One burglar's spouse confided to me that her husband had been "at it

for years, but this was the first time he'd been copped:" which latter

incident she seemed to consider an unpardonable infringement of the

privileges and rights of citizenship. She was a bright buxom little

woman and had evidently flourished on his plunder.

In striking contrast to the burglar's wife, I noticed the daughter of a

would-be suicide, a tall, beautiful girl, who formed a pathetic

contrast to her surroundings. Her unfortunate father--an unsuccessful

musician--had succumbed in the struggle for an honest life, and the

cares of a large family had driven him to desperation. As I gazed at the

poor girl with her tear-swollen eyes and noted her extreme thinness

and the shabbiness of her well-worn clothes, and as, from her, my eyes

turned to the cheerful burglar's wife, I meditated on the superiority of

virtue over dishonesty--especially in the reward accorded to it.

At last, having stated my name, the name of my prisoner, the

relationship or lack of relationship between us, and declared my

non-connection with the case, and having received a tin number in

return for this information, I was ushered through various passages and

apartments into a kind of dark cage, separated by a narrow passage from

a still darker one, in the depths of which I perceived my Anarchist,

O'Flynn, as soon as my eyes had grown accustomed to the darkness. I had

several questions to ask him during the few minutes at our disposal,

and conversation was anything but easy; for on all sides of me other

prisoners and their relatives were talking, weeping, arguing, disputing,

and shouting one another down with all their might and lungs.

Two things struck me in Holloway Prison on this my first visit to such

a place. Firstly, the outward cleanliness, and I might almost say

pleasantness, of the place; and secondly, the illogical nature of the

law which treats the unconvicted men, who in its eyes are consequently

innocent, like convicted criminals. Nothing could be more uncomfortable

and unattractive than the conditions under which the detained men are

allowed to see their relatives; no privacy of any sort is allowed them,

the time allotted is of the briefest, and only one visitor a day is

permitted to pass. The censorship over books allowed is very strict and

hopelessly stupid, and altogether everything is made as uncomfortable as

possible for those under detention.

Later in the course of my Anarchist career I had occasion to visit

Newgate on a similar errand, and was struck by the same incongruity in

the system. The external impression made by Newgate was very different,

however.

There is no suggestion of pleasantness about Newgate. It strikes you

indeed as the threshold of the gallows, and is calculated to arouse

qualms in the most strenuous upholder of capital punishment. A constant

sense of gloom is settled like a pall over the whole building, blacker

even than the soot and grime which encrust it. Inside, the dreary

atmosphere is ominous of the constant vicinity of the hangman's drop,

doors seem for ever to be swinging heavily and locking, keys and chains

clanking, and over all the uncompromising flagstaff looms like an

embodied threat.

After my many dreary wanderings round London, the clambering in and

out of omnibuses and other vehicles, and prison interviews, I found the

old-world tranquillity of the Temple quite a relief.

Here began a new order of search. I had to find a barrister, and that

without delay. But how, whom, and in what court or lane did the right

man dwell? During one brief moment indeed my thoughts turned towards our

family solicitor as a possible counsellor in this matter, but only to be

promptly diverted into other channels. That worthy gentleman's feelings

would certainly not have withstood so rude a shock. I could picture him,

in my mind's eye, slowly removing his gold pince-nez and looking at me

in blank but indulgent surprise, as at one who had suddenly taken leave

of her senses. No, this would never do. Barristers by the score must

surely reside in the labyrinths of the Temple, and I determined to seek

one first hand.

And thus it was that, after some little hesitation, I finally ascended

the stairs of a house in Fig Tree Court in the hope that J. B.

Armstrong, Esq., selected at random, might answer my purpose.

The clerk who opened the door looked politely surprised at my appearance

and inquired my business, into which I promptly plunged headfirst. His

eyebrows gradually ascended higher and higher into the regions of his

hair, and his face grew stern and sad as I proceeded. "Allow me to

inquire," he interrupted, "the name of the solicitor who is instructing

the case."

"I have not got a solicitor," I replied, somewhat taken aback.

Then he re-opened the door. "I feel confident, madam, that Mr. Armstrong

would not care to undertake such a case. Good morning."

I retired from this gentleman's presence neither bent nor broken, though

slightly disappointed. "So it is usual to engage a solicitor first," I

reflected, "and to communicate through him with the barrister, is it?

Well, a solicitor can't be afforded here and we must do without him."

The Anarchist in me revolted at such red-tapeism. "Well, here's for

another plunge," I said to myself; "let us try a B this time. C.

Bardolph sounds promising." And I ascended another staircase and knocked

at another inhospitable door.

Mr. Bardolph I saw in person, a very pompous gentleman with manners the

reverse of polite. He could scarcely contain his outraged feelings when

it came to the question of the solicitor. "I can have no connection

with such a case," he said firmly, and I again retired, feeling quite

disreputable.

My next defeat occurred in the chambers of Mr. Anthony C. Frazer. No

sooner did my eyes fall on that gentleman than I regretted my entry, and

the utter hopelessness of my mission was borne in upon my mind, for I

was beginning to realise the difficulties of the situation and to scent

failure in the very air. Mr. Frazer requested me to be seated and eyed

me curiously, as though I were some queer zoological specimen recently

escaped from captivity, and listened with an incredulous smile to my

narrative. He did not even wait for the missing solicitor. "This is

scarcely in my line, madam," he said, rising. "You have certainly made

some mistake." And he left his clerk to accompany me to the door.

I descended the stairs from this gentleman's chambers feeling distinctly

crestfallen and tired, and at my wits' ends as to where next to go,

when, turning the corner into another court, I became aware of rapid

footsteps in my pursuit, and next moment I was overtaken by the youth

who had ushered me out from the scene of my last defeat.

"I think, miss," he began, "that I can direct you to a--er--barrister

who would just do for your business. On no account say that I

recommended you to him, or you will get me into trouble. But you try

Mr. Curtis in Brick Court. He undertakes the defence of burglars

and swindlers and all sorts of people, and you'll find him cheap and

satisfactory."

I thanked the youth, and although this did not strike me as altogether

the most promising introduction, I thought it best to try my luck

in this new direction, and, having at length discovered the house, I

ascended the three rickety flights of stairs which led to Mr. Curtis's

apartment and entered.

This Curtis was a small, wizened old man, of obsolete cut, but

with remarkably up-to-date manners, and a pair of keen little eyes,

penetrating as Röntgen rays. His hair was weedy, and his clothes snuffy

and ill-fitting; but spite of this there was something uncommonly

brisk and wide awake about the little man, and a certain business-like

directness in his manner which impressed me favourably. I felt hopeful

at once.

One of the first remarks he addressed to me--for we primarily discussed

the financial aspect of his services--struck me by reason of its

uncompromising common sense. "Five guineas down and another three next

Tuesday, miss, and I make no inquiry where the money comes from," he

said, "not so long as it is the current coin of the realm and paid

punctually. Without this, however, I cannot undertake or proceed with

the case."

On my immediately producing the required sum he requested me to be

seated, and sitting down opposite me himself, he asked me for full

particulars of the case. These I gave him to the best of my ability and

he took notes.

The question of witnesses he tackled with the same uncompromising lack

of veneer which had characterised his remarks on the money question.

"Witnesses to character and so forth must be found," he said, "the

more authentic and reputable the better, but at all costs they must be

procured. Whom can you suggest?"

I confessed that I could for the moment think of nobody.

"You will think of somebody," he replied persuasively, "you _must_

remember somebody," and there was that in his voice which did not brook

or encourage contradiction, "some one in a respectable position, of

course," he continued, "a man pursuing one of the liberal professions,

or a business man of means. Plenty of doctors and professional men

among your people, are there not? The evidence of such a man would

carry weight. The court's belief in a witness's veracity is, generally

speaking, proportionate to his means. Doubtless you will be able to

think of a desirable man ... who knows the prisoners," he added, rapidly

turning over his notes, and speaking in such a manner as to convey to

me the idea that the exact extent of the witness's knowledge of the

prisoners was not of any very great consequence, so long as he was

prepared to swear to their respectability, and that his banking account

and general appearance were satisfactory.

"I will look round and let you know the result to-morrow," I answered.

"Good," replied Curtis, "two witnesses at least, and men of position and

education at all costs. Good afternoon."

I had enough to do during the remainder of the day in finding those

witnesses, but found they were at last, though not without a tremendous

effort on my part and some considerable degree of ingenuity. When

attired in some of my brother Raymond's discarded clothes, and

produced for Curtis's inspection the following day, they really made

a respectable couple, and I felt proud of them--one a physician of

superior accomplishments and aristocratic appearance, the other a

master-tailor, of prosperous if not very _distingué_ presence. I

likewise discovered a cabman who had been present in Hyde Park at an

allegedly incriminating speech made by Banter; and on jogging his memory

with a little whisky he distinctly recalled several points valuable to

the defence.

Up till the very day of the trial my time was kept well occupied with

such errands. Indeed, remarkable as the fact may appear, practically the

whole labour of preparing the defence devolved upon me.

It was neither an easy nor a very encouraging task. The greater number

of the English Anarchists mysteriously disappeared at this approach of

danger. Mindful of the truth of the axiom that discretion is the better

part of valour, A thought it well to suddenly recollect his duties

towards his family; B discovered that he had a capacious stomach, which

required feeding; C, that the Anarchist policy was in discord with his

own true principles. At such a moment, therefore, and surrounded, or

rather unsurrounded by such men, the task in front of me was not easy,

and in the actual state of public opinion it was not very hopeful

either.

Public feeling was against the Anarchists. So long as violence and

outrage had been reserved entirely for the benefit of foreign climes,

the British public had regarded the Anarchists with tolerance and

equanimity. But the mysterious death of Myers had alarmed and disquieted

it, and heavy sentences were generally invoked against the prisoners.

That the whole conspiracy was a got-up affair between Jacob Myers and

the police was evident. Neither Banter nor O'Flynn was a dangerous

man; a little loud and exaggerated talk was the utmost extent of their

harmfulness. Neither of them was any better capable of making a bomb

than of constructing a flying-machine, and they were less capable of

throwing it than of flying. But political detectives would have a slow

time of it in this country unless they occasionally made a vigorous

effort on their own behalf, and an unscrupulous and impecunious man like

Myers proved a valuable tool to help such gentlemen along, and fools of

the Banter type suitable victims.

And thus it was that these two men now found themselves in the dock with

twelve serious-minded tradesmen sitting in solemn conclave to consider

their crimes.

The trial itself was a ridiculous farce. Jacob Myers, who would have

been the one witness of any importance, was not subpoenaed; he had in

fact discreetly quitted the country under his wife's escort. The police,

with imperturbable gravity, brought ginger-beer bottles into court which

had been found in O'Flynn's apartment, and which, they averred, could be

converted into very formidable weapons of offence. Many gaseous speeches

made by the prisoners, or attributed to them, were solemnly brought up

against them, and a shudder ran through the court at the mention of such

phrases as "wholesale assassination" and "war to the death."

The evidence, however, sufficed to impress the jury with the extreme

gravity of the case and to alarm the public, and the prisoners were

found guilty.

I well recollect the last day of the trial, which I attended

throughout in more or less remote regions of the Old Bailey, recruiting

recalcitrant witnesses, sending food in to the defendants, &c. Two other

cases were being tried at the same time, one of which was a particularly

revolting murder, for which three persons were on trial. The prisoners'

relatives were waiting below in a state of painful excitement. "Guilty

or not guilty," was on all their lips, "release or penal servitude, life

or death, which was it to be?" Friends were constantly running in and

out of the court giving the women news of the progress of the trials.

"It is looking black for the prisoners!" "There is more hope!" "There is

no hope!" and finally "guilty" in all the cases was reported. The wife

of a horrible German murderer who had strangled his employer's wife,

while a female accomplice played the piano to divert her children's

attention from her cries, swooned away at the news. O'Flynn's old mother

went into hysterics and became quite uncontrollable in her grief when,

a few minutes later the news, "Five years' penal servitude," was brought

down.

A Girl Among the Anarchists · 第 4 / 12 章