THE PAY OF THE SHAMAN.

The consideration which the doctor receives for his services is called

ugista[']`t[)i], a word of doubtful etymology, but probably derived

from the verb ts[)i][']gi[^u], "I take" or "I eat." In former times this

was generally a deer-skin or a pair of moccasins, but is now a certain

quantity of cloth, a garment, or a handkerchief. The shamans disclaim

the idea that the ugist[^a][']`t[)i] is pay, in our sense of the

word, but assert that it is one of the agencies in the removal and

banishment of the disease spirit. Their explanation is somewhat

obscure, but the cloth seems to be intended either as an offering to

the disease spirit, as a ransom to procure the release of his intended

victim, or as a covering to protect the hand of a shaman while engaged

in pulling the disease from the body of the patient. The first theory,

which includes also the idea of vicarious atonement, is common to many

primitive peoples. Whichever may be the true explanation, the evil

influence of the disease is believed to enter into the cloth, which

must therefore be sold or given away by the doctor, as otherwise

it will cause his death when the pile thus accumulating reaches the

height of his head. No evil results seem to follow its transfer from

the shaman to a third party. The doctor can not bestow anything thus

received upon a member of his own family unless that individual gives

him something in return. If the consideration thus received, however,

be anything eatable, the doctor may partake along with the rest of the

family. As a general rule the doctor makes no charge for his services,

and the consideration is regarded as a free-will offering. This remark

applies only to the medical practice, as the shaman always demands

and receives a fixed remuneration for performing love charms, hunting

ceremonials, and other conjurations of a miscellaneous character.

Moreover, whenever the beads are used the patient must furnish a

certain quantity of new cloth upon which to place them, and at the

close of the ceremony the doctor rolls up the cloth, beads and all,

and takes them away with him. The cloth thus received by the doctor

for working with the beads must not be used by him, but must be sold.

In one instance a doctor kept a handkerchief which he received for his

services, but instead sold a better one of his own. Additional cloth

is thus given each time the ceremony is repeated, each time a second

four days' course of treatment is begun, and as often as the doctor

sees fit to change his method of procedure. Thus, when he begins

to treat a sick man for a disease caused by rabbits, he expects to

receive a certain ugista[']`t[)i]; but, should he decide after a time

that the terrapin or the red bird is responsible for the trouble,

he adopts a different course of treatment, for which another

ugista[']`t[)i] is necessary. Should the sickness not yield readily

to his efforts, it is because the disease animal requires a greater

ugista[']`t[)i], and the quantity of cloth must be doubled, so that

on the whole the doctrine is a very convenient one for the shaman. In

many of the formulas explicit directions are given as to the pay which

the shaman is to receive for performing the ceremony. In one of the

Gatigwanasti formulas, after specifying the amount of cloth to be

paid, the writer of it makes the additional proviso that it must be

"pretty good cloth, too," asserting as a clincher that "this is what

the old folks said a long time ago."

The ugista[']`t[)i] can not be paid by either one of a married couple

to the other, and, as it is considered a necessary accompaniment of

the application, it follows that a shaman can not treat his own wife

in sickness, and vice versa. Neither can the husband or wife of the

sick person send for the doctor, but the call must come from some

one of the blood relatives of the patient. In one instance within the

writer's knowledge a woman complained that her husband was very sick

and needed a doctor's attention, but his relatives were taking no

steps in the matter and it was not permissible for her to do so.

The Sacred Formulas of the Cherokees Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1885-1886, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1891, pages 301-398 · 第 90 / 140 题