CHAPTER IX.

SEPTEMBER.

Microscopic value of little pools--Curious facts in appearance

and disappearance of Animalcules and Rotifers--Mode of

preserving them in a glass jar--Fragments of Melicerta

tube--Peculiar shape of Pellets--Amphileptus--Scaridium

Longicaudum--A long-tailed Rotifer--Stephanoceros Eichornii--A

splendid Rotifer--Its gelatinous bottle--Its crown of

tentacles--Retreats on alarm--Illumination requisite to see its

beauties--Its greediness--Richly-coloured Food--Nervous ganglia.

Scattered about Hampstead Heath are a number of little pools, not big

enough to be dignified by the name of ponds. They are generally

surrounded by furze bushes, and would escape attention if not actually

looked for. Those which are mere puddles, and have only a brief

existence in rainy weather, seldom reward the labour of investigation;

but others are permanent, except after prolonged drought, and afford

convenient situations for the growth of confervae, star-weed, and other

plants. These will nearly always repay the microscopic collector during

the winter, when he must break the ice to get at their contents; in

spring, when long chains of frog-spawn afford ocular evidence of the

prolific properties of the Batrachian reptiles; and in summer, when

they afford both shade and sunshine to their numerous inhabitants. Small

beetles, water-spiders, larvae of gnats, and other insects, rotifers,

including the tubicolar sorts, and several varieties of infusoria may be

expected and generally found. There is, however, a curious fact about

ponds, big and little, which Pritchard remarks upon in his 'Infusoria,'

and which corresponds with our own experience, that those which have

proved to be well stocked with any particular creature during one year,

will very likely contain none of it in the next. There are of course

exceptions to this rule, but we have often been astonished and

disappointed at finding the complete change, both in populousness and

population, that a revolution of twelve months will make; and it would

be extremely interesting to notice the changes that took place during a

term of years.

Such researches might unfold some unexpected laws in the succession of

infusorial life. Those germs which are most widely diffused, will be the

most likely to be developed in any mass of convenient water; but how and

why the rarer forms come and go is very imperfectly understood. Slight

modifications in surrounding circumstances will materially affect the

result. Thus, if we bring home a handful of conferva, and a few

water-plants of higher organisation, such as duckweed and anacharis, and

place the whole in a glass jar full of pond-water, we shall at first

have a good stock of objects; but they will usually grow less and less,

until scarcely anything is left. If, however, we introduce a few pieces

of straw, or a tiny wisp of hay, we shall succeed much better, and not

only preserve our population longer, but enjoy a succession of animated

crops. Extensive decomposition of vegetable matter kills off all but

certain families, such as Paramecia, who enjoy it; on the other hand,

too little decomposition proves fatal to some creatures, by depriving

them of their food, and when they have died off, those who depended upon

them for a living, die too. Different vegetables in decomposition suit

different creatures, and hay and straw in that state seem to please the

largest number. An animalcule tank will succeed best when it contains

two or three kinds of growing plants, which oxygenize the air, and a

moderate variety of decomposing organisms will supply food without

making the water offensive.

From these considerations it will be apparent that not only the nature

of the vegetation of a pond, which is often changed by accidental

circumstances, but also the quality of the odds and ends that the winds

may blow into it, or which may fall through the air, will do much to

determine the character and number of its inhabitants, while the

quantity of shade or sunshine it enjoys, will also exercise an important

influence. Hay and other infusions have from the beginning of

microscopic investigations been employed to obtain the creatures which

the Germans call "Infusions thierchen" (infusion animalcules), and the

English "Infusoria;" but very little has yet been done in the way of

their scientific culture and management.

To return from this digression to our little Hampstead ponds, we

obtained from one, in September, that was full of star-weed, a number of

sugar-loaf bodies, adhering to one another, and of a pale yellow brown

colour. The specimens first examined looked complete in themselves, and

were taken for eggs of some water creature. Further search, however,

disclosed aggregations of similar sugar-loaves that had evidently formed

part of a tubular structure, and the idea at once occurred that they

were fragments of a Melicerta tube, a conclusion that was verified by

finding some tubes entire and a dead Melicerta in the rubbish at the

bottom. All the specimens of Melicerta tubes we had hitherto examined

were composed of _rounded_ pellets, but these were made of pointed cones

or sugar-loaves, with the points projecting outwards from the general

surface. In Pritchard's 'Infusoria,' these pellets are described "as

small lenticular bodies." The 'Micrographic Dictionary' states that the

tubes of the Melicerta are composed of "numerous rounded or discoidal

bodies;" and Mr. Gosse, in his 'Tenby,' which contains an admirable

description, and an exquisite drawing of this interesting rotifer, calls

the pellets "round."

[Illustration: Melicerta ringens.]

Not being able to obtain a living specimen of the Melicerta, who made

her tube of long sugar-loaves, I could not tell whether she differed in

structure from the usual pattern of her race, but the general appearance

of the dead body was the same. It is possible that these creatures

possess some power of modifying the form of their singular bricks, or

they may at different ages vary the patterns, which matters some

fortunate possessor of a colony of these animals may be able to

verify.

[Illustration: Scaridium longicaudum.]

In the sediment of the water containing the Melicerta cases was found an

animalcule about 1--120" long, covered with cilia, and having a

proboscis seldom more than a quarter of the length assumed by the body,

which continually changed its form, sometimes elongating, sometimes

shortening, and often contracting one side into a deep fissure. It was,

probably, an _Amphileptus_, though not precisely agreeing with any

drawing or description I am acquainted with. Another inmate of the same

water was a lively long-tailed rotifer, with a small oval body, a tuft

of vibrating cilia and a curved bristle visible among them on one side.

This creature had a jointed tail-foot, ending in two long style-shaped

toes, and by means of this appendage executed rapid leaps or springs. It

was the _Scaridium longicaudum_, and agreed in dimensions tolerably well

with the size given in the books, namely, total length 1--72". With a

power of five hundred diameters the muscles of the tail-foot presented

a beautifully striated appearance.

Towards the end of the month I passed the Vale of Heath Pond, Hampstead,

and although I had not gone out for the purpose of collecting, was

fortunately provided with a two-dram bottle. Close by the path the

_Anacharis alsinastrum_ grew in profusion, quantities of water-snails

crawled among its branches, and small fish darted in and out, threading

their mazes with lightning rapidity. Thrusting a walking-stick among the

mass of vegetation, a few little tufts were drawn up and carefully

bottled, with the addition of a little water. Returning home, a few

leaves were placed in the live-box, and on examination with the power of

sixty diameters they disclosed a specimen of, perhaps, the most

beautiful of all the rotifers, the _Stephanoceros Eichornii_. In this

elegant creature an oval body, somewhat expanded at the top, is

supported upon a tapering stalk, and stands in a gelatinous bottle,

composed of irregular rings superimposed one upon the other, as if

thrown off by successive efforts, the upper ones being inverted and

attached to the body of the animal. But that which constitutes the glory

of this little being is the crown of five tapering tentacles, each

having two rows of long cilia arranged on opposing sides, but not in the

same plane. The ordinary position of the tentacles is that of a graceful

elliptical curve, first swelling outwards, then bending inwards, until

their points closely approximate, but each is capable of independent

motion, and they are seldom quiet for many minutes at a time. The cilia

can be arranged in parallel rows or in tufts at the will of the

creature, and their motion appears under control, and susceptible of

greater modification than is exhibited by the ordinary infusoria.

[Illustration: Stephanoceros Eichornii.]

The Stephanoceros is a member of the Floscule family, but in all the

specimens I obtained and watched for several weeks, there was an

important difference in the relation of the tube to the creature. In the

Floscules I had never seen anything like an adhesion between the tube

and the animal, but in the Stephanoceros I noticed it continually, and

always in the manner already described. Like the Floscule, the

Stephanoceros is readily alarmed, and retreats into her house, carrying

with her the invaginated portion. In the last edition of 'Pritchard's

Infusoria,' this case is spoken of as apparently not tubular, but a

solid gelatinous mass, enveloping the animal as high up as the base of

the rotatory arms. It is very likely that specimens at different ages,

and possibly in different seasons, may vary in the structure of their

abodes; but I am not able to concur in the preceding account, as all the

tubes I examined resembled sacks turned in at the mouths, and attached

to the shoulders only of their inmates; and on one occasion I was able

to look down into a deserted tube, which had not collapsed, as it would

have done if it had been merely a solid gelatinous mass.

Like the Floscule, the Stephanoceros only reveals her beauties under

careful illumination. A direct light renders them invisible, and only

when the requisite obliquity has been obtained, does the exquisite

character of the structure become displayed. The dark-ground

illumination is very useful, and makes the ciliary action very distinct.

At times a view can be obtained, in which the cilia of perhaps a single

tentacle are all ranged like the steel springs of a musical box. For a

moment they are quiescent, and then they vibrate in succession, each

moving thread sparkling in the light. With a clumsy mode of lighting

them, the cilia look like stumpy bristles, and are often so drawn; but

precisely the right quantity of light coming in the right direction,

makes them appear more numerous, and much longer than would at first be

supposed. When well exhibited the tentacles have a lustre between glass

and pearl; the body, in a favorable specimen, is like a crystal cup, and

the food, usually composed of small red and green globes, glows like

emeralds and rubies, as if in the height of luxury the little epicure

had more than rivalled Cleopatra's draught, and instead of dissolving,

swallowed its jewelry whole. So lustrous and varied in colour is the

whole appearance of the animal under these circumstances, that it is

frequently alluded to by one of our first artists, to whom it was

displayed.

It is said by some authors that the tentacles are used to seize prey.

This never occurred under my observation, although their basal portions

are often approximated when an object is forced down to the grinding

apparatus below. The Stephanoceros is a ravenous feeder, and swallows a

variety of creatures. Green vegetable monads, rich red and brown globes

of similar characters, and any animalcule that comes in her way is

acceptable; and even good-sized rotifers do not escape her

all-consuming maw. On one occasion I noticed one of the loricated sort,

more than half as long as one of her tentacles, rapidly swallowed, and

passed downwards without attempting to escape. Objects much too big for

the gizzard are often gulped down, and probably receive a preliminary

softening and maceration in the crop. Very often, when food is

plentiful, the creature is filled to the brim, but still endeavours to

continue her abundant meal. From the presence of large quantities of

food and the density of the integuments, the gizzard cannot always be

seen; but in favorable specimens its teeth may be observed busily at

work.

At the base of the tentacles small masses of matter may be discovered,

which are probably nervous ganglia, and other organs; and Ehrenberg

discovered small vibrating bodies, supposed to be connected with the

function of respiration. A single egg, as shown in the annexed drawing,

is often found, and the ovarian is said to develop but few at a time.

Two red eyes are found in young specimens, but in adults they either

disappear or are not conspicuous. The Stephanoceri are sociable animals,

and when one is found, others are probably near at hand. Several may

often be discovered on the same branch of a small water-plant, of

various dimensions, and in different stages of growth. The full size is

about 1--36" in height, and from its magnitude care is required not to

crush it in the live-box. When specimens are plentiful, some should be

placed in that convenient receptacle; and others with the plant on which

they are growing, in a glass cell or trough, where they have more room

to display their motions, and can with fresh supplies of water, be

preserved for days and weeks. With occasional renewals from one pond, I

was able to keep up a stock for about three months, and never had

objects which gave more pleasure to myself or to my friends.

Marvels of Pond-life Or, A Year's Microscopic Recreations Among the Polyps, Infusoria, Rotifers, Water-bears and Polyzoa · 第 9 / 13 章