CHAPTER I.

Produced by D Alexander and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images generously made available by The

Internet Archive)

Makers of History

Henry IV.

BY JOHN S. C. ABBOTT

WITH ENGRAVINGS

NEW YORK AND LONDON

HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS

1904

Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight

hundred and fifty-six, by

HARPER & BROTHERS,

in the Clerk's office of the District Court of the Southern District

of New York.

Copyright, 1884, by SUSAN ABBOT MEAD.

PREFACE.

History is our Heaven-appointed instructor. It is the guide for the

future. The calamities of yesterday are the protectors of to-day.

The sea of time we navigate is full of perils. But it is not an

unknown sea. It has been traversed for ages, and there is not a sunken

rock or a treacherous sand-bar which is not marked by the wreck of

those who have preceded us.

There is no portion of history fraught with more valuable instruction

than the period of those terrible religious wars which desolated the

sixteenth century. There is no romance so wild as the veritable

history of those times. The majestic outgoings of the Almighty, as

developed in the onward progress of our race, infinitely transcend, in

all the elements of profoundness, mystery, and grandeur, all that

man's fancy can create.

The cartoons of Raphael are beautiful, but what are they when compared

with the heaving ocean, the clouds of sunset, and the pinnacles of the

Alps? The dome of St. Peter's is man's noblest architecture, but what

is it when compared with the magnificent rotunda of the skies?

JOHN S. C. ABBOTT.

Brunswick, Maine, 1856.

CONTENTS.

Chapter Page

I. CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH 13

II. CIVIL WAR 45

III. THE MARRIAGE 68

IV. PREPARATIONS FOR MASSACRE 93

V. MASSACRE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW 109

VI. THE HOUSES OF VALOIS, OF GUISE, AND OF

BOURBON 137

VII. REIGN OF HENRY III 167

VIII. THE LEAGUE 196

IX. THE ASSASSINATION OF THE DUKE OF GUISE

AND OF HENRY III 220

X. WAR AND WOE 256

XI. THE CONVERSION OF THE KING 281

XII. THE REIGN OF HENRY IV. AND HIS DEATH 306

ENGRAVINGS.

Page

THE BIRTH OF HENRY OF NAVARRE 19

THE FLIGHT OF THE QUEEN OF NAVARRE 52

THE MARRIAGE 87

THE MASSACRE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW 115

THE ASSASSINATION OF FRANCIS, DUKE OF GUISE 161

THE ASSASSINATION OF HENRY, DUKE OF GUISE 228

THE ASSASSINATION OF HENRY III. 238

THE ACT OF ABJURING PROTESTANTISM 292

THE RECONCILIATION WITH MAYENNE 309

KING HENRY IV.

CHAPTER I.

CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH.

1475-1564

Navarre.--Catharine de Foix.--Ferdinand and Isabella.--Dismemberment

of Navarre.--Plans for revenge.--Death of Catharine.--Marriage of

Henry and Margaret.--Lingering hopes of Henry.--Jeanne returns to

Navarre.--Birth of Henry IV.--The royal nurse.--Name chosen for the

young prince.--The castle of Courasse.--Education of Henry.--Death of

the King of Navarre.--Jeanne d'Albret ascends the throne.--Residence

in Bearn.--Marriage of Mary, Queen of Scots.--Betrothal of

Henry.--Henry's tutor.--Remark of Dr. Johnson.--Henry's motto.--La

Gaucherie's method of instruction.--Death of Henry II.--Catharine de

Medicis regent.--Influence of Plutarch.--Religious agitation.--The

Huguenots.--The present controversy.--The Sorbonne.--Purging the

empire.--The burning chamber.--Persecution of the Protestants.--Calvin

and his writings.--Calvin's physical debility.--Continued

labors.--Execution of Servetus.--Inhabitants of France.--Antony

of Bourbon.--Jeanne d'Albret.--The separation.--Different

life.--Rage of the Pope.--Growth of Protestantism.--Catharine's

blandishments.--Undecided action.--Seizure of the queen.--Civil

war.--Death of Antony of Bourbon.--Effects of the war.--Liberty of

worship.--Indignation and animosity.--Religious toleration.--Belief of

the Romanists.--Establishment of freedom of conscience.

About four hundred years ago there was a small kingdom, spreading over

the cliffs and ravines of the eastern extremity of the Pyrenees,

called Navarre. Its population, of about five hundred thousand,

consisted of a very simple, frugal, and industrious people. Those who

lived upon the shore washed by the stormy waves of the Bay of Biscay

gratified their love of excitement and of adventure by braving the

perils of the sea. Those who lived in the solitude of the interior, on

the sunny slopes of the mountains, or by the streams which meandered

through the verdant valleys, fed their flocks, and harvested their

grain, and pressed rich wine from the grapes of their vineyards, in

the enjoyment of the most pleasant duties of rural life. Proud of

their independence, they were ever ready to grasp arms to repel

foreign aggression. The throne of this kingdom was, at the time of

which we speak, occupied by Catharine de Foix. She was a widow, and

all her hopes and affections were centred in her son Henry, an ardent

and impetuous boy six or seven years of age, who was to receive the

crown when it should fall from her brow, and transmit to posterity

their ancestral honors.

Ferdinand of Aragon had just married Isabella of Castile, and had thus

united those two populous and wealthy kingdoms; and now, in the

arrogance of power, seized with the pride of annexation, he began to

look with a wistful eye upon the picturesque kingdom of Navarre. Its

comparative feebleness, under the reign of a bereaved woman weary of

the world, invited to the enterprise. Should he grasp at the whole

territory of the little realm, France might interpose her powerful

remonstrance. Should he take but the half which was spread out upon

the southern declivity of the Pyrenees, it would be virtually saying

to the French monarch, "The rest I courteously leave for you." The

armies of Spain were soon sweeping resistlessly through these sunny

valleys, and one half of her empire was ruthlessly torn from the Queen

of Navarre, and transferred to the dominion of imperious Castile and

Aragon.

Catharine retired with her child to the colder and more uncongenial

regions of the northern declivity of the mountains. Her bosom glowed

with mortification and rage in view of her hopeless defeat. As she sat

down gloomily in the small portion which remained to her of her

dismembered empire, she endeavored to foster in the heart of her son

the spirit of revenge, and to inspire him with the resolution to

regain those lost leagues of territory which had been wrested from the

inheritance of his fathers. Henry imbibed his mother's spirit, and

chafed and fretted under wrongs for which he could obtain no redress.

Ferdinand and Isabella could not be annoyed even by any force which

feeble Navarre could raise. Queen Catharine, however, brooded deeply

over her wrongs, and laid plans for retributions of revenge, the

execution of which she knew must be deferred till long after her body

should have mouldered to dust in the grave. She courted the most

intimate alliance with Francis I., King of France. She contemplated

the merging of her own little kingdom into that powerful monarchy,

that the infant Navarre, having grown into the giant France, might

crush the Spanish tyrants into humiliation. Nerved by this determined

spirit of revenge, and inspired by a mother's ambition, she intrigued

to wed her son to the heiress of the French throne, that even in the

world of spirits she might be cheered by seeing Henry heading the

armies of France, the terrible avenger of her wrongs. These hopes

invigorated her until the fitful dream of her joyless life was

terminated, and her restless spirit sank into the repose of the grave.

She lived, however, to see her plans apparently in progress toward

their most successful fulfillment.

Henry, her son, was married to Margaret, the favorite sister of the

King of France. Their nuptials were blessed with but one child, Jeanne

d'Albret. This child, in whose destiny such ambitious hopes were

centred, bloomed into most marvelous beauty, and became also as

conspicuous for her mental endowments as for her personal charms. She

had hardly emerged from the period of childhood when she was married

to Antony of Bourbon, a near relative of the royal family of France.

Immediately after her marriage she left Navarre with her husband, to

take up her residence in the French metropolis.

One hope still lived, with undying vigor, in the bosom of Henry. It

was the hope, the intense passion, with which his departed mother had

inspired him, that a grandson would arise from this union, who would,

with the spirit of Hannibal, avenge the family wrongs upon Spain.

Twice Henry took a grandson into his arms with the feeling that the

great desire of his life was about to be realized; and twice, with

almost a broken heart, he saw these hopes blighted as he committed the

little ones to the grave.

Summers and winters had now lingered wearily away, and Henry had

become an old man. Disappointment and care had worn down his frame.

World-weary and joyless, he still clung to hope. The tidings that

Jeanne was again to become a mother rekindled the lustre of his fading

eye. The aged king sent importunately for his daughter to return

without delay to the paternal castle, that the child might be born in

the kingdom of Navarre, whose wrongs it was to be his peculiar destiny

to avenge. It was mid-winter. The journey was long and the roads

rough. But the dutiful and energetic Jeanne promptly obeyed the wishes

of her father, and hastened to his court.

Henry could hardly restrain his impatience as he waited, week after

week, for the advent of the long-looked-for avenger. With the

characteristic superstition of the times, he constrained his daughter

to promise that, at the period of birth, during the most painful

moments of her trial, she would sing a mirthful and triumphant song,

that her child might possess a sanguine, joyous, and energetic spirit.

Henry entertained not a doubt that the child would prove a boy,

commissioned by Providence as the avenger of Navarre. The old king

received the child, at the moment of its birth, into his own arms,

totally regardless of a mother's rights, and exultingly enveloping it

in soft folds, bore it off, as his own property, to his private

apartment. He rubbed the lips of the plump little boy with garlic, and

then taking a golden goblet of generous wine, the rough and royal

nurse forced the beverage he loved so well down the untainted throat

of his new-born heir.

"A little good old wine," said the doting grandfather, "will make the

boy vigorous, and brave."

We may remark, in passing, that it was _wine_, rich and pure: not that

mixture of all abominations, whose only vintage is in cellars,

sunless, damp, and fetid, where guilty men fabricate poison for a

nation.

[Illustration: THE BIRTH OF HENRY IV.]

This little stranger received the ancestral name of Henry. By his

subsequent exploits he filled the world with his renown. He was the

first of the Bourbon line who ascended the throne of France, and he

swayed the sceptre of energetic rule over that wide-spread realm with

a degree of power and grandeur which none of his descendants have ever

rivaled. The name of Henry IV. is one of the most illustrious in the

annals of France. The story of his struggles for the attainment of the

throne of Charlemagne is full of interest. His birth, to which we have

just alluded, occurred at Parr, in the kingdom of Navarre, in the year

1553.

His grandfather immediately assumed the direction of every thing

relating to the child, apparently without the slightest consciousness

that either the father or the mother of Henry had any prior claims.

The king possessed, among the wild and romantic fastnesses of the

mountains, a strong old castle, as rugged and frowning as the eternal

granite upon which its foundations were laid. Gloomy evergreens clung

to the hill-sides. A mountain stream, often swollen to an impetuous

torrent by the autumnal rains and the spring thaws, swept through the

little verdant lawn, which smiled amid the stern sublimities

surrounding this venerable and moss-covered fortress. Around the

solitary towers the eagles wheeled and screamed in harmony with the

gales and storms which often swept through these wild regions. The

expanse around was sparsely settled by a few hardy peasants, who, by

feeding their herds, and cultivating little patches of soil among the

crags, obtained a humble living, and by exercise and the pure mountain

air acquired a vigor and an athletic-hardihood of frame which had

given them much celebrity.

To the storm-battered castle of Courasse, thus lowering in congenial

gloom among these rocks, the old king sent the infant Henry to be

nurtured as a peasant-boy, that, by frugal fare and exposure to

hardship, he might acquire a peasant's robust frame. He resolved that

no French delicacies should enfeeble the constitution of this noble

child. Bareheaded and barefooted, the young prince, as yet hardly

emerging from infancy, rolled upon the grass, played with the poultry,

and the dogs, and the sturdy young mountaineers, and plunged into the

brook or paddled in the pools of water with which the mountain showers

often filled the court-yard. His hair was bleached and his cheeks

bronzed by the sun and the wind. Few would have imagined that the

unattractive child, with his unshorn locks and in his studiously

neglected garb, was the descendant of a long line of kings, and was

destined to eclipse them all by the grandeur of his name.

As years glided along he advanced to energetic boyhood, the constant

companion, and, in all his sports and modes of life, the equal of the

peasant-boys by whom he was surrounded. He hardly wore a better dress

than they; he was nourished with the same coarse fare. With them he

climbed the mountains, and leaped the streams, and swung upon the

trees. He struggled with his youthful competitors in all their

athletic games, running, wrestling, pitching the quoit, and tossing

the bar. This active out-door exercise gave a relish to the coarse

food of the peasants, consisting of brown bread, beef, cheese, and

garlic. His grandfather had decided that this regimen was essential

for the education of a prince who was to humble the proud monarchy of

Spain, and regain the territory which had been so unjustly wrested

from his ancestors.

When Henry was about six years of age, his grandfather, by gradual

decay, sank sorrowingly into his grave. Consequently, his mother,

Jeanne d'Albret, ascended the throne of Navarre. Her husband, Antony

of Bourbon, was a rough, fearless old soldier, with nothing to

distinguish him from the multitude who do but live, fight, and die.

Jeanne and her husband were in Paris at the time of the death of her

father. They immediately hastened to Bearn, the capital of Navarre, to

take possession of the dominions which had thus descended to them. The

little Henry was then brought from his wild mountain home to reside

with his mother in the royal palace. Though Navarre was but a feeble

kingdom, the grandeur of its court was said to have been unsurpassed,

at that time, by that of any other in Europe. The intellectual

education of Henry had been almost entirely neglected; but the

hardihood of his body had given such vigor and energy to his mind,

that he was now prepared to distance in intellectual pursuits, with

perfect ease, those whose infantile brains had been overtasked with

study.

Henry remained in Bearn with his parents two years, and in that time

ingrafted many courtly graces upon the free and fetterless carriage he

had acquired among the mountains. His mind expanded with remarkable

rapidity, and he became one of the most beautiful and engaging of

children.

About this time Mary, Queen of Scots, was to be married to the Dauphin

Francis, son of the King of France. Their nuptials were to be

celebrated with great magnificence. The King and Queen of Navarre

returned to the court of France to attend the marriage. They took with

them their son. His beauty and vivacity excited much admiration in the

French metropolis. One day the young prince, then but six or seven

years of age, came running into the room where his father and Henry

II. of France were conversing, and, by his artlessness and grace,

strongly attracted the attention of the French monarch. The king

fondly took the playful child in his arms, and said affectionately,

"Will you be my son?"

"No, sire, no! that is my father," replied the ardent boy, pointing to

the King of Navarre.

"Well, then, will you be my son-in-law?" demanded Henry.

"Oh yes, most willingly," the prince replied.

Henry II. had a daughter Marguerite, a year or two younger than the

Prince of Navarre, and it was immediately resolved between the two

parents that the young princes should be considered as betrothed.

Soon after this the King and Queen of Navarre, with their son,

returned to the mountainous domain which Jeanne so ardently loved. The

queen devoted herself assiduously to the education of the young

prince, providing for him the ablest teachers whom that age could

afford. A gentleman of very distinguished attainments, named La

Gaucherie, undertook the general superintendence of his studies. The

young prince was at this time an exceedingly energetic, active,

ambitious boy, very inquisitive respecting all matters of information,

and passionately fond of study.

Dr. Johnson, with his rough and impetuous severity, has said,

"It is impossible to get Latin into a boy unless you flog it into

him."

The experience of La Gaucherie, however, did not confirm this

sentiment. Henry always went with alacrity to his Latin and his Greek.

His judicious teacher did not disgust his mind with long and laborious

rules, but introduced him at once to words and phrases, while

gradually he developed the grammatical structure of the language. The

vigorous mind of Henry, grasping eagerly at intellectual culture,

made rapid progress, and he was soon able to read and write both Latin

and Greek with fluency, and ever retained the power of quoting, with

great facility and appositeness, from the classical writers of Athens

and of Rome. Even in these early days he seized upon the Greek phrase

[Greek: "_e nikan e apothanein_"], _to conquer or to die_, and adopted

it for his motto.

La Gaucherie was warmly attached to the principles of the Protestant

faith. He made a companion of his noble pupil, and taught him by

conversation in pleasant walks and rides as well as by books. It was

his practice to have him commit to memory any fine passage in prose or

verse which inculcated generous and lofty ideas. The mind of Henry

thus became filled with beautiful images and noble sentiments from the

classic writers of France. These gems of literature exerted a powerful

influence in moulding his character, and he was fond of quoting them

as the guide of his life. Such passages as the following were

frequently on the lips of the young prince:

"Over their subjects princes bear the rule,

But God, more mighty, governs kings themselves."

Soon after the return of the King and Queen of Navarre to their own

kingdom, Henry II. of France died, leaving the crown to his son

Charles, a feeble boy both in body and in mind. As Charles was but ten

or twelve years of age, his mother, Catharine de Medicis, was

appointed regent during his minority. Catharine was a woman of great

strength of mind, but of the utmost depravity of heart. There was no

crime ambition could instigate her to commit from which, in the

slightest degree, she would recoil. Perhaps the history of the world

retains not another instance in which a mother could so far forget the

yearnings of nature as to endeavor, studiously and perseveringly, to

deprave the morals, and by vice to enfeeble the constitution of her

son, that she might retain the power which belonged to him. This proud

and dissolute woman looked with great solicitude upon the enterprising

and energetic spirits of the young Prince of Navarre. There were many

providential indications that ere long Henry would be a prominent

candidate for the throne of France.

Plutarch's Lives of Ancient Heroes has perhaps been more influential

than any other uninspired book in invigorating genius and in

enkindling a passion for great achievements. Napoleon was a careful

student and a great admirer of Plutarch. His spirit was entranced with

the grandeur of the Greek and Roman heroes, and they were ever to him

as companions and bosom friends. During the whole of his stormy

career, their examples animated him, and his addresses and

proclamations were often invigorated by happy quotations from classic

story. Henry, with similar exaltation of genius, read and re-read the

pages of Plutarch with the most absorbing delight. Catharine, with an

eagle eye, watched these indications of a lofty mind. Her solicitude

was roused lest the young Prince of Navarre should, with his

commanding genius, supplant her degenerate house.

At the close of the sixteenth century, the period of which we write,

all Europe was agitated by the great controversy between the Catholics

and the Protestants. The writings of Luther, Calvin, and other

reformers had aroused the attention of the whole Christian world. In

England and Scotland the ancient faith had been overthrown, and the

doctrines of the Reformation were, in those kingdoms, established. In

France, where the writings of Calvin had been extensively circulated,

the Protestants had also become quite numerous, embracing generally

the most intelligent portion of the populace. The Protestants were in

France called Huguenots, but for what reason is not now known. They

were sustained by many noble families, and had for their leaders the

Prince of Conde, Admiral Coligni, and the house of Navarre. There were

arrayed against them the power of the crown, many of the most powerful

nobles, and conspicuously the almost regal house of Guise.

It is perhaps difficult for a Protestant to write upon this subject

with perfect impartiality, however earnestly he may desire to do so.

The lapse of two hundred years has not terminated the great conflict.

The surging strife has swept across the ocean, and even now, with more

or less of vehemence, rages in all the states of this new world.

Though the weapons of blood are laid aside, the mighty controversy is

still undecided.

The advocates of the old faith were determined to maintain their

creed, and to force all to its adoption, at whatever price. They

deemed heresy the greatest of all crimes, and thought--and doubtless

many conscientiously thought--that it should be exterminated even by

the pains of torture and death. The French Parliament adopted for its

motto, "_One religion, one law, one king._" They declared that two

religions could no more be endured in a kingdom than two governments.

At Paris there was a celebrated theological school called the

Sorbonne. It included in its faculty the most distinguished doctors of

the Catholic Church. The decisions and the decrees of the Sorbonne

were esteemed highly authoritative. The views of the Sorbonne were

almost invariably asked in reference to any measures affecting the

Church.

In 1525 the court presented the following question to the Sorbonne:

"_How can we suppress and extirpate the damnable doctrine of Luther

from this very Christian kingdom, and purge it from it entirely?_"

The prompt reply was, "_The heresy has already been endured too long.

It must be pursued with the extremest rigor, or it will overthrow the

throne._"

Two years after this, Pope Clement VII. sent a communication to the

Parliament of Paris, stating,

"It is necessary, in this great and astounding disorder,

which arises from the rage of Satan, and from the fury and

impiety of his instruments, that every body exert himself to

guard the common safety, seeing that this madness would not

only embroil and destroy religion, but also all principality,

nobility, laws, orders, and ranks."

The Protestants were pursued by the most unrelenting persecution. The

Parliament established a court called the _burning chamber_, because

all who were convicted of heresy were burned. The estates of those

who, to save their lives, fled from the kingdom, were sold, and their

children, who were left behind, were pursued with merciless cruelty.

The Protestants, with boldness which religious faith alone could

inspire, braved all these perils. They resolutely declared that the

Bible taught their faith, and their faith only, and that no earthly

power could compel them to swerve from the truth. Notwithstanding the

perils of exile, torture, and death, they persisted in preaching what

they considered the pure Gospel of Christ. In 1533 Calvin was driven

from Paris. When one said to him, "Mass must be true, since it is

celebrated in all Christendom;" he replied, pointing to the Bible,

"There is my mass." Then raising his eyes to heaven, he solemnly said,

"O Lord, if in the day of judgment thou chargest me with not having

been at mass, I will say to thee with truth, 'Lord, thou hast not

commanded it. Behold thy law. In it I have not found any other

sacrifice than that which was immolated on the altar of the cross.'"

In 1535 Calvin's celebrated "Institutes of the Christian Religion"

were published, the great reformer then residing in the city of Basle.

This great work became the banner of the Protestants of France. It was

read with avidity in the cottage of the peasant, in the work-shop of

the artisan, and in the chateau of the noble. In reference to this

extraordinary man, of whom it has been said,

"On Calvin some think Heaven's own mantle fell,

While others deem him instrument of hell,"

Theodore Beza writes, "I do not believe that his equal can be found.

Besides preaching every day from week to week, very often, and as much

as he was able, he preached twice every Sunday. He lectured on

theology three times a week. He delivered addresses to the Consistory,

and also instructed at length every Friday before the Bible

Conference, which we call the congregation. He continued this course

so constantly that he never failed a single time except in extreme

illness. Moreover, who could recount his other common or extraordinary

labors? I know of no man of our age who has had more to hear, to

answer, to write, nor things of greater importance. The number and

quality of his writings alone is enough to astonish any man who sees

them, and still more those who read them. And what renders his labors

still more astonishing is, that he had a body so feeble by nature, so

debilitated by night labors and too great abstemiousness, and, what is

more, subject to so many maladies, that no man who saw him could

understand how he had lived so long. And yet, for all that, he never

ceased to labor night and day in the work of the Lord. We entreated

him to have more regard for himself; but his ordinary reply was that

he was doing nothing, and that we should allow God to find him always

watching, and working as he could to his latest breath."

Calvin died in 1564, eleven years after the birth of Henry of Navarre,

at the age of fifty-five. For several years he was so abstemious that

he had eaten but one meal a day.[A]

[Footnote A: In reference to the execution of Servetus for heresy, an

event which, in the estimation of many, has seriously tarnished the

reputation of Calvin, the celebrated French historian M. Mignet, in a

very able dissertation, establishes the following points:

1. Servetus was not an ordinary heretic; he was a bold

pantheist, and outraged the dogma of all Christian

communions by saying that God, in three persons, was a

Cerberus, a monster with three heads. 2. He had already been

condemned to death by the Catholic doctors at Vienne in

Dauphiny. 3. The affair was judged, not by Calvin, but by

the magistrates of Geneva; and if it is objected that his

advice must have influenced their decision, it is necessary

to recollect that the councils of the other reformed cantons

of Switzerland approved the sentence with a unanimous voice.

4. It was of the utmost importance for the Reformation to

separate distinctly its cause from that of such an

unbeliever as Servetus. The Catholic Church, which in our

day accuses Calvin of having participated in his

condemnation, much more would have accused him, in the

sixteenth century, with having solicited his acquittal.]

At this time the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants of France

were Catholics--it has generally been estimated a hundred to one; but

the doctrines of the reformers gained ground until, toward the close

of the century, about the time of the Massacre of St. Bartholomew, the

Protestants composed about one sixth of the population.

The storm of persecution which fell upon them was so terrible that

they were compelled to protect themselves by force of arms. Gradually

they gained the ascendency in several cities, which they fortified,

and where they protected refugees from the persecution which had

driven them from the cities where the Catholics predominated. Such was

the deplorable condition of France at the time of which we write.

In the little kingdom of Navarre, which was but about one third as

large as the State of Massachusetts, and which, since its

dismemberment, contained less than three hundred thousand inhabitants,

nearly every individual was a Protestant. Antony of Bourbon, who had

married the queen, was a Frenchman. With him, as with many others in

that day, religion was merely a badge of party politics. Antony spent

much of his time in the voluptuous court of France, and as he was, of

course, solicitous for popularity there, he espoused the Catholic side

of the controversy.

Jeanne d'Albret was energetically a Protestant. Apparently, her faith

was founded in deep religious conviction. When Catharine of Medici

advised her to follow her husband into the Catholic Church, she

replied with firmness,

"Madam, sooner than ever go to mass, if I had my kingdom and my son

both in my hands, I would hurl them to the bottom of the sea before

they should change my purpose."

Jeanne had been married to Antony merely as a matter of state policy.

There was nothing in his character to win a noble woman's love. With

no social or religious sympathies, they lived together for a time in a

state of respectful indifference; but the court of Navarre was too

quiet and religious to satisfy the taste of the voluptuous Parisian.

He consequently spent most of his time enjoying the gayeties of the

metropolis of France. A separation, mutually and amicably agreed upon,

was the result.

Antony conveyed with him to Paris his son Henry, and there took up his

residence. Amidst the changes and the fluctuations of the

ever-agitated metropolis, he eagerly watched for opportunities to

advance his own fame and fortune. As Jeanne took leave of her beloved

child, she embraced him tenderly, and with tears entreated him never

to abandon the faith in which he had been educated.

Jeanne d'Albret, with her little daughter, remained in the less

splendid but more moral and refined metropolis of her paternal domain.

A mother's solicitude and prayers, however, followed her son. Antony

consented to retain as a tutor for Henry the wise and learned La

Gaucherie, who was himself strongly attached to the reformed religion.

The inflexibility of Jeanne d'Albret, and the refuge she ever

cheerfully afforded to the persecuted Protestants, quite enraged the

Pope. As a measure of intimidation, he at one time summoned her as a

heretic to appear before the Inquisition within six months, under

penalty of losing her crown and her possessions. Jeanne, unawed by the

threat, appealed to the monarchs of Europe for protection. None were

disposed in that age to encourage such arrogant claims, and Pope Pius

VI. was compelled to moderate his haughty tone. A plot, however, was

then formed to seize her and her children, and hand them over to the

"tender mercies" of the Spanish Inquisition. But this plot also

failed.

In Paris itself there were many bold Protestant nobles who, with arms

at their side, and stout retainers around them, kept personal

persecution at bay. They were generally men of commanding character,

of intelligence and integrity. The new religion, throughout the

country, was manifestly growing fast in strength, and at times, even

in the saloons of the palace, the rival parties were pretty nearly

balanced. Although, throughout the kingdom of France, the Catholics

were vastly more numerous than the Protestants, yet as England and

much of Germany had warmly espoused the cause of the reformers, it

was perhaps difficult to decide which party, on the whole, in Europe,

was the strongest. Nobles and princes of the highest rank were, in all

parts of Europe, ranged under either banner. In the two factions thus

contending for dominion, there were, of course, some who were not much

influenced by conscientious considerations, but who were merely

struggling for political power.

When Henry first arrived in Paris, Catharine kept a constant watch

over his words and his actions. She spared no possible efforts to

bring him under her entire control. Efforts were made to lead his

teacher to check his enthusiasm for lofty exploits, and to surrender

him to the claims of frivolous amusement. This detestable queen

presented before the impassioned young man all the blandishments of

female beauty, that she might betray him to licentious indulgence. In

some of these infamous arts she was but too successful.

Catharine, in her ambitious projects, was often undecided as to which

cause she should espouse and which party she should call to her aid.

At one time she would favor the Protestants, and again the Catholics.

At about this time she suddenly turned to the Protestants, and

courted them so decidedly as greatly to alarm and exasperate the

Catholics. Some of the Catholic nobles formed a conspiracy, and seized

Catharine and her son at the palace of Fontainebleau, and held them

both as captives. The proud queen was almost frantic with indignation

at the insult.

The Protestants, conscious that the conspiracy was aimed against them,

rallied for the defense of the queen. The Catholics all over the

kingdom sprang to arms. A bloody civil war ensued. Nearly all Europe

was drawn into the conflict. Germany and England came with eager

armies to the aid of the Protestants. Catharine hated the proud and

haughty Elizabeth, England's domineering queen, and was very jealous

of her fame and power. She resolved that she would not be indebted to

her ambitious rival for aid. She therefore, most strangely, threw

herself into the arms of the _Catholics_, and ardently espoused their

cause. The Protestants soon found her, with all the energy of her

powerful mind, heading their foes. France was deluged in blood.

A large number of Protestants threw themselves into Rouen. Antony of

Bourbon headed an army of the Catholics to besiege the city. A ball

struck him, and he fell senseless to the ground. His attendants placed

him, covered with blood, in a carriage, to convey him to a hospital.

While in the carriage and jostling over the rough ground, and as the

thunders of the cannonade were pealing in his ears, the spirit of the

blood-stained soldier ascended to the tribunal of the God of Peace.

Henry was now left fatherless, and subject entirely to the control of

his mother, whom he most tenderly loved, and whose views, as one of

the most prominent leaders of the Protestant party, he was strongly

inclined to espouse.

The sanguinary conflict still raged with unabated violence throughout

the whole kingdom, arming brother against brother, friend against

friend. Churches were sacked and destroyed; vast extents of country

were almost depopulated; cities were surrendered to pillage, and

atrocities innumerable perpetrated, from which it would seem that even

fiends would revolt. France was filled with smouldering ruins; and the

wailing cry of widows and of orphans, thus made by the wrath of man,

ascended from every plain and every hill-side to the ear of that God

who has said, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."

At last both parties were weary of the horrid strife. The Catholics

were struggling to extirpate what they deemed ruinous heresy from the

kingdom. The Protestants were repelling the assault, and contending,

not for general liberty of conscience, but that their doctrines _were

true_, and _therefore_ should be sustained. Terms of accommodation

were proposed, and the Catholics made the great concession, as they

regarded it, of allowing the Protestants to conduct public worship

_outside of the walls of towns_. The Protestants accepted these terms,

and sheathed the sword; but many of the more fanatic Catholics were

greatly enraged at this toleration. The Guises, the most arrogant

family of nobles the world has ever known, retired from Paris in

indignation, declaring that they would not witness such a triumph of

heresy. The decree which granted this poor boon was the famous edict

of January, 1562, issued from St. Germain. But such a peace as this

could only be a truce caused by exhaustion. Deep-seated animosity

still rankled in the bosom of both parties; and, notwithstanding all

the woes which desolating wars had engendered, the spirit of religious

intolerance was eager again to grasp the weapons of deadly strife.

During the sixteenth century the doctrine of religious toleration was

recognized by no one. That great truth had not then even dawned upon

the world. The noble toleration so earnestly advocated by Bayle and

Locke a century later, was almost a new revelation to the human mind;

but in the sixteenth century it would have been regarded as impious,

and rebellion against God to have affirmed that _error_ was not to be

pursued and punished. The reformers did not advocate the view that a

man had a right to believe what he pleased, and to disseminate that

belief. They only declared that they were bound, at all hazards, to

believe the _truth;_ that the views which they cherished were _true_,

and that _therefore_ they should be protected in them. They appealed

to the Bible, and challenged their adversaries to meet them there. Our

fathers must not be condemned for not being in advance of the age in

which they lived. That toleration which allows a man to adopt, without

any civil disabilities, any mode of worship that does not disturb the

peace of society, exists, as we believe, only in the United States.

Even in England Dissenters are excluded from many privileges.

Throughout the whole of Catholic Europe no religious toleration is

recognized. The Emperor Napoleon, during his reign, established the

most perfect freedom of conscience in every government his influence

could control. His downfall re-established through Europe the dominion

of intolerance.

The Reformation, in contending for the right of private judgment in

contradiction to the claims of councils, maintained a principle which

necessarily involved the freedom of conscience. This was not then

perceived; but time developed the truth. The Reformation became, in

reality, the mother of all religious liberty.

Henry IV, Makers of History · 第 1 / 12 章