PLATE VIII.

"Madness! thou chaos of the brain,

What art? that pleasure giv'st and pain,

Tyranny of fancy's reign!

Mechanic fancy! that can build

Vast labyrinths and mazes wild,

With rule disjointed, shapeless measure,

Fill'd with horror, fill'd with pleasure!

Shapes of horror, that would even

Cast doubt of mercy upon Heaven;

Shapes of pleasure, that but seen,

Would split the shaking sides of Spleen.

O vanity of age! here see

The stamp of Heaven effac'd by thee!

The headstrong course of youth thus run,

What comfort from this darling son?

His rattling chains with terror hear,

Behold death grappling with despair!

See him by thee to ruin sold,

And curse thyself, and curse thy gold!"

[Illustration: THE RAKE'S PROGRESS, PLATE VIII.]

"Last scene of all,--which ends this strange eventful history!"

But in this scene, dreary and horrid as are its accompaniments, he is

attended by the faithful and kind-hearted female whom he so basely

betrayed. In the first plate we see him refuse her his promised hand.

In the fourth she releases him from the harpy fangs of a bailiff; she

is present at his marriage. In the hope of relieving his distress,

she follows him to a prison. Wishing to soothe his misery and

alleviate his woe, she here attends him in a madhouse! What a return

for deceit and desertion!

The Reverend Mr. Gilpin, in his elucidation of these eight prints,

asserts that "this thought is rather unnatural, and the moral

certainly culpable."[93] With the utmost deference for his critical

abilities, I must entertain a different opinion. We have had many

similar examples of female attachment. If it be culpable to forgive

those which have despitefully used us, to free those which are in

bonds, to visit those which are in prison, and to comfort those which

are in affliction, what meaning have the divine precepts of our holy

religion?

The female mind is naturally credulous, affectionate, and--in its

attachments--ardent. If, in her peculiar situation, her assiduities

must be deemed in any degree culpable, let us remember that this is

but a frail vessel of refined clay. When the awful record of her

errors is unrolled, may that sigh which was breathed for the misery

of a fellow-mortal waft away the scroll, and the tears which flowed

for the calamities of others float the memorial down the stream of

oblivion!

On the errors of women, let us look with the allowance and humanity

of men. Enchanting woman! thou balm of life! soother of sorrow!

solace of the soul! how dost thou lessen the load of human misery,

and lead the wretched into the valley of delight! Without thee, how

heavily would man drag through a dreary world; but if the white hand

of a fascinating female be twined round his arm, how joyous, how

lightly doth he trip along the path!

That warm and tender friend, who in the most trying situations

retains her enthusiastic fondness, and in every change of fortune

preserves unabated love, ought to be embraced as the first bension of

heaven, the completion of earthly happiness! Let man but draw such a

prize in the lottery of life, and glide down the stream of existence

with such a partner, and neither the cold averted eye of a summer

friend, nor the frowns of an adverse fortune, should ever produce a

pang or excite a murmur. But enough,--let not the chaste feelings

of blushing innocence be wounded by this rhapsody, or for a moment

suppose that the episode, or effusion, or e'en whatever she pleases,

is intended as a vindication of female folly; in good truth it is

not. The writer would not wish it delivered to the cold-fingered

portress of Diana's temple, but it may be laid upon that altar which

is sacred to Friendship, to Hymen, to Love.--There we will leave it,

and return to the plate before us.

A gentleman[94] from whom I have once or twice reluctantly presumed

to differ, says that "the drawing of the principal figure is a more

accurate piece of anatomy than we commonly find in the works of this

master." The observation is perfectly just, but the inaccuracies

of Mr. Hogarth did not arise from inability, but from inattention.

He says further, that "the expression of the principal figure is

rather unmeaning." The late and ever to be lamented Mr. Mortimer,

whose wonderful abilities as an artist were only equalled by his

amiable and kind-hearted virtues as a man,--the late Mr. Mortimer, of

whom I can never think without a sigh of regard and regret, thought

very differently. He was once requested to delineate several of the

passions, as they are personified by Mr. Gray. One of the subjects

proposed was,--

"Moody madness, laughing wild, amid severest woe."

The instant this line was read to him, he opened a portfolio, took

out the eighth plate of the "Rake's Progress," and pointing to the

principal figure, exclaimed, "Sir, if I had never seen this print, I

should say it was not possible to paint these contending passions in

the same countenance. Having seen this, which exactly displays Mr.

Gray's idea, I dare not attempt it. I could only make a correct copy;

for the alteration of a single line would be a departure from the

character."

The reclining figure, with a cross leaning near him, is in a high

degree terrific.[95]

"With horror wild,

'Tis Devotion's ruin'd child,

Sunk in the emphasis of grief;

Nor can he feel, nor dares he ask relief."

In the cell are the portraits of three saints, whose systems were

built on the necessity of propagating the religion of mercy by the

sword and the wheel.

Near him are two astronomers, one with a paper rolled up to imitate a

telescope, gazing at the roof, in the idea that it is

"The spacious canopy of heaven, fretted with golden fires."

The other, delineating the firing off a bomb and a ship moored at

a distance, is an immediate ridicule of Whiston's project for the

discovery of the longitude,--an object which at this time engaged the

attention of the philosophical world, and in the fruitless search

after which many a feeble head hath become mad, north--north-west!

The opposite group form a whimsical trio. A mad musician, a

counterfeit presentment of St. Peter, and a poor gentleman, with his

hands clasped together, that appears by the inscription of "Charming

Betty Careless," which he has chalked upon a board, to be

"Craz'd with care, and cross'd by hopeless love."

He is absorbed in thought, and his whole soul so engrossed by the

charms of his Dulcinea, that neither the discordant sounds of the

fiddler, whose trembling strings

"Grate harshly on the nerve auricular,"

nor the roar of the pope, who is furiously denouncing destruction on

all heretics, nor the ear-piercing noise of a barking cur, can awake

him from his reverie.

A crazy tailor and a mimic monarch complete this congregation of

calamity.

Two women, impelled by a most unaccountable curiosity, are walking

in the background. Devoid of that delicacy which gives beauty new

attractions, they forget that an eagerness to witness woe which

they cannot alleviate, gives strong indication of an hardened and

unfeeling heart.

The halfpenny stuck against a wall, and dated 1763, was inserted by

Mr. Hogarth the year before his death, and is designed to intimate

that Britannia was then mad. This is one of the few instances wherein

he has called in the aid of allegory, but his allegory was always

seasoned with wit.

Of the expression I have already spoken. The disposition of the

figures is good. That group in which the usurper of St. Peter's

chair is the principal object, is well contrived. There is great

simplicity and breadth in the background, and the light and

perspective are judicious.

"Protract not, curious ears, the mournful tale;

But o'er the hapless group low drop Compassion's veil."

The eight prints of the "Rake's Progress," with "Southwark Fair,"

were advertised in the _London Daily Post_ to be delivered June 25th,

1735, with an apology for the publication being deferred, which Mr.

Hogarth states to have been occasioned by his waiting until the royal

assent was given to an Act intended to secure all new invented prints

from being copied, etc.

This series are in every respect superior to those which preceded

them, but were not honoured with an equal attention by the public.

From what did this arise? Were the town more interested in the story

of an harlot than in the adventures of a rake, or had this new mode

of engraving history lost its novelty?

On this occasion was published an octavo pamphlet, entitled, "_The

Rake's Progress, or the Humours of Drury Lane_, a Poem in eight

Cantos, in Hudibrastic verse; being the Rambles of a modern Oxonian:

which is a complete Key to the eight Prints lately published by

the celebrated Mr. Hogarth. Printed for John Chetwood, and sold at

Inigo Jones' Head, against Exeter Change, Strand, 1735." This is a

most contemptible and indecent performance. In some of the copies

are inserted eight prints; but they are only the designs of Hogarth

mutilated, and perhaps were originally engraved for the decoration of

some other work.

There is reason to believe that the artist once intended to have

introduced the ceremony of a marriage contract, instead of the levee,

as an unfinished painting of the scene is still preserved. In this

sketch he appears to have thought of taking the same ground with Mr.

Pope:

"What brought Sir Visto's ill-got wealth to waste?

Some demon whisper'd, 'Visto, have a taste.'"

For our Rake is there turned connoisseur; and among a number of

articles which prove him a man of _virtu_, is a canvas containing the

representation of a human foot.[96]

In the year 1745 the eight pictures were sold by auction, at Mr.

Hogarth's in Leicester Fields, and produced twenty-two guineas each;

total, one hundred and eighty-four pounds, sixteen shillings. They

are now, I believe, in the possession of Mr. Beckford of Fonthill, in

Wiltshire.

Hogarth's Works, with life and anecdotal descriptions of his pictures. Volume 1 (of 3) · 第 69 / 186 题