ERNEST: OR, PARENT FOR A DAY

I

I had been talking rather loosely about the bringing-up of children.

They had been lately appearing to me in the guise of infinitely

prevalent little beings who impressed themselves almost too vividly

upon one’s consciousness. My summer vacation I had passed in a

household where a vivacious little boy of two years and a solemn little

boy of six months had turned their mother into a household slave. I had

seen walks, conversations, luncheons, and all the amenities of summer

civilized life, shot to pieces by the indomitable need of imperious

little children to be taken care of. Little boys who came running at

you smiling, stubbed their toes, and were instantly transformed into

wailing inconsolables; babies who woke importunately at ten o’clock in

the evening, and had to be brought down warm and blinking before the

fire; human beings who were not self-regulating, but to whom every

hard surface, every protuberance, was a menace to happiness, and in

whom every want and sensation was an order and claim upon somebody

else--these were new offerings to my smooth and independent existence.

They interested and perturbed me.

The older little boy, with his sunny luxuriance of hair and cheek,

was always on the point of saying something novel and disconcerting.

The baby, with his deep black eyes, seemed to be waiting silently and

in soft anticipation for life. He would look at you so calmly and yet

so eagerly, and give you a pleasant satisfaction that just your mere

presence, your form, your movement, were etching new little lines on

his cortex, sending new little shoots of feeling through his nerves.

You were being part of his education just by letting his consciousness

look at you. I liked particularly to hold my watch to his ear, and

see the sudden grave concentration of his face, as he called all his

mind to the judgment of this arresting phenomenon. I would love to

accost him as he lay murmuring in his carriage, and to check his little

breakings into tears by quick movements of my hands. He would watch me

intently for a while until the fact of his little restless woe would

come upon him again. I was challenged then to something more startling,

and the woe would disappear in little short gasps. But I would find

that he was subject to the law of diminishing returns. The moment would

arrive when the woe submerged everything in a wail, and his mother

would have to be called to nurse or coddle him in the magical motherly

way.

The baby I found perhaps more interesting than his little brother,

for the baby’s moods had more style to them. The brother could be

transformed from golden prattlingness to raging storm, with the most

disconcerting quickness. He could want the most irrational things with

an intensity that got itself expressed in hypnotic reiteration. Some

smoldering will-to-power in one’s self told one that a child should

never be given the thing that he most wanted; and yet in five minutes

one would have given him one’s soul, to be rid of the brazen rod which

he pounded through one. But I could not keep away from him. He and

his baby brother absorbed me, and when I contemplated their mother’s

life, I had many a solemn sense of the arduousness of being a parent.

I thought of the long years ahead of them, and the incalculability of

their manifestations. I shuddered and remained, gloating, I am afraid,

a little over the opportunity of enjoyment without responsibility.

All these things I was recounting the other evening after dinner to a

group of friends who professionally look after the minds and bodies

of the neglected. I was explaining my absorption, and the perils

and merciless tyranny of the mother’s life, and my thankfulness at

having been so much in, and yet so much not of, the child-world. I

was not responsible, and the policeman mother could be called in at

any time to soothe or to quell. I could always maintain the amused

aloofness which is my usual attitude toward children. And I made the

point that parenthood must become less arduous after the child is a

self-regulating little organism, and can be trusted not to commit

suicide inadvertently over every threshold, can feed himself, dress

himself, and take himself reasonably around. I even suggested unwarily

that after five or six the tyranny was much mitigated.

There was strong dissent. Just at that age, I was told, the real

responsibilities began. I was living in a fool’s paradise of

bachelordom if I thought that at six children were grown-up. One of the

women before the fire made it her business to get children adopted. I

had a sense of foreboding before she spoke. She promptly confirmed my

intuition by offering to endow me with an infant of six years, for a

day or for as long as I would take him. The hearty agreement of the

rest amazed and alarmed me. They seemed delighted at the thought of my

becoming parent for a day. I should have Ernest. They all knew Ernest;

and I should have him. They seemed to have no concern that he would not

survive my brief parenthood. It rather warmed and flattered me to think

that they trusted me.

I had a sense of being caught in an inescapable net, prisoner of my own

theories. If children of six were no longer tyrants, the possession

of Ernest would not interfere with my work or my life. I had spoken

confidently. I had a reputation among my friends of speaking eloquently

about “the child.” And I always find it almost impossible to resist the

offer of new experience. I hesitated and was lost. I even found myself

naming the day for Ernest’s momentary adoption. And during all that

week I found it increasingly impossible to forget him. The night before

Ernest was to come I told myself that I could not believe that this

perilous thing was about to happen to me. I made no preparations to

receive Ernest in my tiny bachelor apartment. I felt that I was in the

hands of fate.

History of a literary radical, and other essays · 第 50 / 65 题