The Creole City at that time swarmed with gold-seekers on their way to or

returning from the newly-found Ophir of the Occident. Though the first

headlong rush to California was over, it still drew its thousands every

month, and Greeley's famous advice to the young man was followed without

having been asked. Lola became infected with the fever. There was much of

the gambler in her nature, and her zest for adventure was keener than of

old. At this time, too, a positive distaste for civilisation appears to

have possessed her. It may have been the vision of a wild, unfettered life

in a virgin land that dispelled the sickly hankerings for the cloister.

She sailed across the Gulf of Mexico to San Juan del Norte, or Greytown,

as it is now called, the newly opened halfway-house to the gold-fields.

Thence the route lay across the beautiful savannahs of Nicaragua to the

Pacific shore. She passed the white-walled towns of Leon and Rivas, which

Walker and his filibusters two years later harried with fire and sword.

This was an alternative route to that across the isthmus of Panama, which

she was fabled to have followed in a book by Russell, the

war-correspondent, called the "Adventures of Mrs. Seacole." Lola refers

to this mendacious romance in her little autobiography, and quotes the

following passage in order to characterise it at the finish as a base

fabrication from beginning to end:--

"Occasionally some distinguished passengers passed on the upward and

downward tides of ruffianism and rascality that swept periodically

through Cruces. Came one day Lola Montez, in the full zenith of her

evil fame, bound for California with a strange suite. A good-looking,

bold woman, with fine, bad eyes and a determined bearing, dressed

ostentatiously in perfect male attire, with shirt collar turned down

over a velvet lapelled coat, richly worked shirt-front, black hat,

French unmentionables, and natty polished boots with spurs. She

carried in her hand a handsome riding-whip, which she could use as

well in the streets of Cruces as in the towns of Europe; for an

impertinent American, presuming, perhaps not unnaturally, upon her

reputation, laid hold jestingly of the tails of her long coat, and, as

a lesson, received a cut across his face that must have marked him for

some days. I did not see the row which followed, and was glad when the

wretched woman rode off on the following morning."

The incident is a spicy little bit of fiction, such as is so easily

invented by the fertile journalistic brain. The adjectives applied to Lola

also illustrate, in a mildly diverting manner, the strictly orthodox

notions of morality entertained by the newspaper press, and the pontifical

confidence with which journalists pronounce on questions of conduct.[25]

On the long journey to the golden gate, Lola had as a fellow-passenger a

young man named Patrick Purdy Hull, a native of Ohio, and editor of the

_San Francisco Whig_. The acquaintance thus formed soon ripened into an

attachment. Though, upon her arrival in California, the Countess

immediately went on tour among the mining camps, her new victim did not

lose sight of her. For the third time Lola went through the ceremony of

wedlock. On 1st July 1853 she married Hull at the Church of the Mission

Dolores, "in presence," runs the report, "of a select party, among whom

were Beverly C. Saunders, Esq., Judge Wills, James E. Wainwright, Esq., A.

Bartol, Esq., Louis R. Lull, S. A. Brinsmade, and other prominent

citizens"--all among the most remarkable men in that country, no doubt.

"The bride and groom have since visited Sacramento, and are now in

domestic retirement at San Francisco."[26]

From the reports of remarkable men and prominent citizens shooting each

other in the public streets, of bandits raiding the suburbs, of fires and

floods, that accompany this announcement, we should imagine that domestic

retirement in San Francisco was at that time subject to frequent and

unpleasant interruption. On this account, perhaps, Mr. and Mrs. Hull spent

much of their time hunting in the valley of the Sacramento. Lola was in

search of new sensations, and for the moment the bear seemed a more

attractive quarry than the man. But before long a German medical man,

named Adler, himself a mighty hunter, came across her path. His prowess

excited her admiration, and he at once fell a victim to the shafts from

her quiver. Hull was discarded and the German reigned in his stead.

In these American _amours_ we seem to detect the last flickerings of the

flame of passion--the woman's last strenuous efforts to find a real and

lasting interest in life. But Lola had played too much with love. That

mighty force which she had so often exploited and exerted to the

furtherance of her ambitions was no longer at her command. Her capacity

for love was exhausted; by passion she was no more to rule or to be ruled.

She had hardly time to tire of her German lover, who accidentally shot

himself while following the chase--no bad death for a hunter. It might

have been expected that Lola would now quit California and return to more

congruous surroundings. But a distaste for men and cities, for the

restraints of civilisation, had grown strong within her. Just then she was

sick of love and sick of the world. At her best, a splendid animal, with

fierce elemental passions, she turned almost instinctively, to draw fresh

supplies of vitality from "the green, sweet-hearted earth." She made

herself a home in a cabin at Grass Valley, a lawless mining camp, among

the foot-hills of the Sierra Nevada. All her life she had loved animals,

and these she now made her special friends and companions, finding in

their marvellous stores of affection and devotion ample compensation for

the muddy evanescent emotion that men call love. She did not, of course,

lead the life of a hermit. We catch glimpses of her in a despatch from

Nevada City, dated 20th January 1854:--

"The merry ringing of sleigh bells has been heard for several days

past in our city. Several sleighs have been fitted up, and the young

gentlemen have treated the ladies to some dashing turn-outs. On

Tuesday last, Lola Montez paid us a visit by this conveyance and a

span of horses, decorated with impromptu cowbells. She flashed like a

meteor through the snowflakes and wanton snowballs, and after a tour

of the thoroughfares, disappeared in the direction of Grass Valley."

There she continued to dwell during the rest of that year, her liking for

the simple life unabated. A correspondent of the _San Francisco Herald_,

who visited her on 13th December, describes her as--

"living a quiet, and apparently cosy life, surrounded by her pet

birds, dogs, goats, sheep, hens, turkeys, pigs, and her pony. The

latter seems to be a favourite with Lola, and is her companion in all

her mountain rambles. Surely it is a strange metamorphosis to find the

woman who has gained a world-renowned notoriety, and has played a part

upon the stage of life with powerful potentates, and with whose name

Europe and the world is familiar, finally settled down at home in the

mountain wilds of California."

A strange change, indeed, but no unpleasant life it could have been. What

memories, what scenes, must have supplied food for the lonely woman's

musings, as she galloped over the hills, or, seated with her dogs, gazed

into her great fire of resinous logs! In communion thus with our great

mother, treading these virgin forests, and breathing an air hardly yet

inhaled by man, she might have attained to a higher, truer plane of

existence than that which she finally took to be firm ground. But luck was

against her here, as always. A fire swept away the township of Grass

Valley, and with it Lola's little homestead--the only home that she had

ever known. Her animals were dispersed, she was without funds. But she had

renewed her stock of vitality at Nature's fountains. She went on her

travels again, reinvigorated: a coarser woman, no doubt, thanks to her

contact with miners and hunters, but, perhaps, a better one. She still

loved the new auriferous lands. In the track of the sun she would continue

to journey, and in June sailed from California across the ocean to

Australia.

XXX

IN AUSTRALIA

Even to the antipodes--in the 'fifties unconnected by the telegraph with

the rest of the world, and distant a three months' journey from

England--the fame of the Countess of Landsfeld had extended. Her name had

travelled completely round the world, and was as familiar to the people of

Sydney as to those of London and Paris. Lola found that her prolonged rest

cure had weakened in no way her hold on public curiosity. The moment for

her arrival in New South Wales was not, however, well chosen. Commerce and

agriculture were alike depressed, and the mind of the Colonists was

preoccupied with the business of constitution-making. The city lay, too,

under the spell of a celebrated Irish singer, Miss Catherine Hayes, "the

sweet swan of Erin." It is, perhaps, worth noting that this vocalist was

born at the same town as Lola, was married at the same church (St.

George's, Hanover Square), and was to die the same year; that she made her

_debut_ under the same manager (Benjamin Lumley), at the same theatre, and

that the two women had for the last year or two trodden undeviatingly in

each other's footsteps. Miss Hayes had been in possession of the Prince of

Wales's Theatre nearly a fortnight, when Lola's arrival startled the

eldest Australian city. The newcomer was engaged by Tonning of the

Victoria Theatre, and was announced to appear, together with Mr. Lambert,

Mr. Falland, and Mr. C. Jones, on 23rd August 1855, in the four-act drama,

_Lola Montez in Bavaria_. The theatre was crowded to excess.

"The Countess looked charming, and acted very archly. She was cheered

vociferously, and recalled before the curtain, when she delivered a

short address. Mr. Lambert (well known in London) created quite a

sensation in the King of Bavaria (by which name he is now known), and

at the end of the performance the Countess presented him with a

handsome bundle of cigarettes--a very great compliment, as she is an

inveterate smoker, and seldom gives any cigars away.

"The excitement about her immediately empties the Prince of Wales's

Theatre, and Miss Hayes is then taken suddenly ill. Two nights after

the Countess of Landsfeld is seriously indisposed, and Miss Hayes

recovers. Her recovery restores Lola Montez to perfect health."[27]

On 27th August she appeared in _Yelva, or the Orphan of Russia_, "a new

and exciting drama" she had herself translated from the French. On

Wednesday, 6th September, she took a benefit, playing in _The Follies of a

Night_, and two farces. Into one of these she introduced her "Spider

Dance," which seems to have outraged colonial opinion. We need not condemn

it on that account as immodest, for in our own day we have seen a

performance interdicted as offensive to public morals in Manchester, and

pronounced (rightly) to be the quintessence of mobile grace and the truest

poetry of motion in the not less considerable city of London. Immodesty

in the minds of many people definitely connotes that which pleases the

eyes and the senses.

Business continued dull at Sydney, and Lola departed in the second week of

September for Melbourne. A dispute had arisen between her and another

member of her company, Mrs. Fiddes, who issued a writ of attachment

against her. Brown, the sheriff, went aboard the steamer to apprehend

Lola, who retired to her cabin till the vessel was well under weigh. She

then sent word that the officer could arrest her if he would, but she was

obliged to tell him that she was quite naked. The bold expedient was, of

course, successful. "Poor Brown," we are told, "blushed and retired, and

was put on shore at the Heads, about twenty miles from Sydney, and was

greeted on his return to the city with roars of laughter." The sheriff

evidently did not object to repeating a good story, even at his own

expense.

At Melbourne, Lola must have been vividly reminded of California. The gold

fever was at its height. The population of the Port Philip district had

swollen in five years from 76,000 to 364,000, of which number at least

two-thirds were men. Men, too, they were, of every nationality under the

sun, and of every class, though the more criminal and dangerous elements

were in the ascendant. In '55 life and property were, notwithstanding,

somewhat more secure here than in California, thanks to the firmer, less

corrupt administration of British officials. Prices were, it need not be

said, extravagantly high, though the barest necessities of decent life

were hardly obtainable outside Melbourne and Geelong. A goldfield would

seem to be one of the most brutalising environments to which a human

being can adapt himself.

For our knowledge of Lola's doings in the Victorian capital, we are

indebted to the _Era's_ local correspondent. He writes:--

"Lola Montez made her _debut_ on 21st September, in a short drama

allusive to her own Bavarian transactions, but the piece might well

have borne curtailment. There was a very crowded audience. The

_ci-devant_ Countess of Landsfeld seemed determined to preserve her

notoriety intact by the selection, but entrenched so far upon decorum

in the 'Spider Dance' on a subsequent evening, that she did not face

the clamour raised in consequence till the objectionable portions were

agreed to be omitted. She is certainly a very singular character, but

there is an ever lively and brusque style in her action that seems to

catch general approbation for the time being.

"After a brief stay, Lola departed for Geelong; but there, I learn,

her performances were freely condemned. Indeed, their laxness was also

much canvassed with us, and the more staid of the visitors openly

enough expressed their censure. Subsequently to the performance, Dr.

Milman demanded of the Mayor at the City Court, in the name of an

outraged community, that a warrant be issued against all repetition of

the performances of Mme. Lola Montez at the Theatre Royal. The Mayor

referred the matter to the private room of the magistrates,

considering that should be the proper place for its discussion. The

bench declared that the law would not sustain them in issuing a

warrant unless the Doctor had actually witnessed the performance, and

had his information properly attested by witnesses. This he declared

he would do."

The methods of these self-constituted champions of outraged morality are

the same in every age. They condemn first, and collect evidence

afterwards--if at all.

Opinion in Geelong does not seem to have been as hostile as the _Era's_

correspondent supposed. In the _Geelong Advertiser_ of 10th October is to

be found the following paragraph:--

ILLNESS OF LOLA MONTEZ

"Owing to severe indisposition, this talented actress is unable to

appear before a Geelong audience. When competent to perform, her

reappearance will be duly notified. Madame is suffering from severe

cold and bronchitis, and is now under the care of Dr. Thompson, of

Melbourne. To previous indisposition was superadded a severe attack

induced by exposure to the thunderstorm on Saturday."

Lola's illness was of a passing character. That it in no way impaired her

vigour we shall presently see. From Melbourne she proceeded to the

goldfields, moving among the most desperate characters of the two

hemispheres undismayed and unafraid, a woman capable of defending herself

with whip and tongue. A singular character, in truth was hers, thus

equally at home in kings' courts and miners' camps, able to parry and to

counterplot against the schemes and intrigues of Metternich, able to

subdue and to tame the half-savage ex-convicts and desperadoes of the

Australian diggings.

At Ballaarat occurred the celebrated fracas with Mr. Seekamp. This man was

the editor of the local newspaper (the _Times_), and upon Lola's arrival

in the town, he published an article, putting the worst construction on

the episodes of her past life, and reflecting in uncomplimentary terms on

her character. He was, no doubt, another guardian of public morality,

which in mining camps is, of course, a very delicate growth. A few

evenings afterwards, he was so rash as to call at the United States Hotel,

where the woman he had traduced was staying. Being informed that he was

below, Lola ran downstairs with a riding-whip, and laid it across his back

with right good will. The journalist also held a whip, with which he

defended himself lustily. Before long the combatants had each other

literally by the hair. The bystanders interposed, and the two were

separated, but not before life-preservers and revolvers had been produced.

It seems to us an unedifying performance, though a woman, if insulted, has

undoubtedly the right to chastise her offender physically, if she is able.

Such was the view taken by the miners of Ballaarat. At the theatre that

evening she was the object of an ovation, which she acknowledged at the

conclusion of the performance.

"I thank you," she said, "most sincerely for your friendship. I regret

to be obliged to refer again to Mr. Seekamp, but it is not my fault,

as he again in this morning's paper repeated his attack upon me. You

have heard of the scene that took place this afternoon. Mr. Seekamp

threatens to continue his charges against my character. I offered,

though a woman, to meet him with pistols; but the coward who could

beat a woman, ran from a woman. He says he will drive me off the

diggings; but I will change the tables, and make Seekamp _de_camp

(applause). My good friends, again I thank you."[28]

This conduct was "unladylike," no doubt, but courageous; ungracious, but

absolutely necessary.

Seekamp, bruised and humiliated, thirsted for revenge. We find him

publishing a story of his conqueror's defeat in the _Ballaarat Times_. The

authority can hardly be regarded as unimpeachable, but with amusing

simplicity it has been accepted as such by all who have written about

Lola. According, then, to the ungallant Mr. Seekamp, the Countess of

Landsfeld was engaged by a manager, named Crosby--of what theatre is not

stated. At "treasury" the actress had a misunderstanding with this

gentleman, and flew into a violent rage. At this opportune moment a relief

force appeared in the person of Mrs. Crosby, armed with a whip. With this

she chastised Lola so severely that the weapon broke. The antagonists then

threw themselves upon each other, and the rest (says the delicately-minded

journalist) may be imagined rather than described. Mr. Seekamp's recent

experience should indeed have enabled him to imagine such a scene without

difficulty; in fact, he probably imagined this one. He concludes: "At last

this terrible virago has found, not her master, but her mistress, and for

many a long day will be incapable of performing at any theatre."

These words were written, possibly, while Lola was on her way to Europe.

She appears to have quitted Australia in March or April 1856. With her

arrival in France in August that year, she completed her trip round the

world.

XXXI

LOLA AS A LECTURER

We have no knowledge of the business that took Lola once more to France on

this occasion. She probably went there to spend, in the most agreeable way

possible, the considerable sums she had amassed in her Australian tour. It

may be supposed that she spent some time at Paris, renewing the

acquaintance of her old friends. Dumas, Mery, De Beauvoir, were all

living, and death had made few gaps in her circle of friends during the

past ten years. In August, Lola followed the fashionable crowd to the

southern watering-places, and stayed at St. Jean de Luz, within easy reach

of the imperial court at Biarritz. Hence she addressed this extraordinary

letter to the _Estafette_:--

"ST. JEAN DE LUZ, HOTEL DU CYGNE,

"_2nd September, 1856_.

"The Belgian newspapers, and some French ones, have asserted that the

suicide of the actor, Mauclerc, who, it is reported, has thrown

himself from the summits of the Pic du Midi, was caused by domestic

troubles for which I was responsible. This is a calumny which M.

Mauclerc himself will be ready to refute. We separated amicably, it is

true, after eight days of married life, but urged only by our common

and imperious need of personal liberty. It is probable that the

tragedy of the Pic du Midi exists only in the imagination of some

journalist on the look-out for sensational news. Trusting to your

sense of fairness to insert this explanation in your excellent

journal, I remain, yours, etc.,

LOLA MONTEZ."

This letter was copied by _La Presse_, which De Girardin still edited, and

was presently noticed by the person most interested. His reply was duly

published:--

"BAYONNE, _9th September, 1856_.

"SIR,--I read in your issue of the 7th. inst. a letter from Lola

Montez, wherein there is talk of a suicide of which I have been the

victim, and a marriage in which I have been principal actor. I am a

complete stranger to such catastrophes. I have never had the least

intention of throwing myself from the Pic du Midi, or from any other

peak, and I do not recollect having had the advantage of

marrying--even for eight days--the celebrated Countess of

Landsfeld,--Yours, etc.,

MAUCLERC."[29]

The simplest and most probable explanation of this affair is to set it

down as a hoax. Bayonne and St. Jean de Luz are neighbouring towns, and it

is possible that the actor had (perhaps unwittingly) incurred the anger of

the Countess, who devised this rather elaborate means of revenge.

Soon after, Lola returned to the United States, a country for which she

had conceived a strong liking. She considered it her home, says the Rev.

F. L. Hawks, and had a sincere admiration for its institutions. Lola was

by nature a republican, and intimacy with sovereigns had not much awakened

her distaste for them.

"To Freedom ever true, true, true,

All his long life was Harlequin!"

On 2nd February 1857 we find her fulfilling a week's engagement at the

Green Street Theatre at Albany, acting in _The Eton Boy_, _The Follies of

a Night_, and _Lola in Bavaria_. She was not unknown at the state capital,

having appeared there, with a _troupe_ of twelve dancers, at the Museum,

in May 1852. On the present occasion she gave another proof of her

dare-devil courage, by crossing the Hudson River in an open skiff among

the floating ice.

"She got over in safety, but part of her wardrobe was carried down

stream. By going to Troy she could have avoided all danger, but her

love of notoriety led her to offer a hundred dollars to be carried

across here."[30]

This recklessness may have proceeded from that want of interest in life,

that utter sense of desolation, which assailed her whenever she was not

distracted by travel and adventure. A lonely, disenchanted woman, without

any ties or hold on life, she found herself now on the verge of forty. Her

days for adventure had passed. At times she must have sighed for her home

among the Californian foothills. Surely it was wise and dignified, for one

who had exhausted her strength and vitality in the struggles of an

artificial society, to throw herself on the placid bosom of our common

mother? There, in time, she would have awakened to fuller comprehension of

man's place in the universe, and have learned at once the true value of

all her past actions, and the futility of remorse. But in New York no one

listened for the whisperings of Nature; instead, they fancied they heard

voices from some other world. Women who have lost their hold on life

readily give ear to visionaries: having exhausted the joys of this world,

they wish to test those of another. Lola became a believer in

spiritualism. The imagined touch of some fatuous phantom would thrill her

as no man's had power to do. One day she announced that the spirits had

directed her to abandon the stage, and to become a lecturer. Apparently,

however, she had no confidence in their ability to inspire her on the

platform, for she caused her lectures to be written by the Rev. C. Chauncy

Burr. At the _seances_ she seems to have been brought into touch (in two

senses) with several of the clergy of various Protestant denominations.

Her first lecture was delivered at a place of worship called the Hope

Chapel, 720 Broadway, New York, on 3rd February 1858.

"Lola Montez at Hope Chapel is good," chuckles a reporter. "It is

plain that the scent of the roses hangs round her still. We have heard

some queer things in that conventicle in our time, and have now and

then assisted at an entertainment there twice as funny, but not half

so intellectual nor half so wholesome, as the lecture our desperado in

dimity gave us last night."

Lola Montez · 第 12 / 14 段