Part I. of this work consists of ‘Practical Rules,’ &c., which are

clearly delivered and satisfactorily illustrated. Part II. is a

continuation of the first, therefore it was hardly necessary to

separate it. This includes a few good examples, and a very useful

table, calculated on divisions into tenths, eighths, sixths, &c. of the

fourth open string, and showing in notes, the harmonics resulting from

the string when touched at any of those points of division.

* * * * *

No. 2 is chiefly made up of materials furnished by the author of No. 1.

The latter, however, finding that what he supplied had been published

in an incorrect, incomplete manner, determined on printing his own

system, or that which we have above noticed.

* * * * *

The titles of Nos. 3 and 4 fully describe the nature of the two

publications, which, we will add, display great industry and no little

ingenuity.

ANCIENT CONCERTS.

SEVENTH CONCERT,

_Under the Direction of the Duke of Cumberland, Wednesday,_

_May 1, 1833._

~Act I.~

Introduction. Chorus. ‘O come, let us sing.’ ~Handel.~

(_Anthem._)

Air, ‘O come, let us worship.’ Mr. Vaughan. Chorus, ~Handel.~

‘Glory and worship.’

Frost Scene, ‘What ho!’ (_King Arthur._) ~Purcell.~

Concerto 5th. (_Grand._) ~Handel.~

Cantata, ‘From silent shades.’ Miss Stephens ~Purcell.~

Madrigal, ‘Let me, careless.’ ~Linley.~

Song, ‘Sorprender mi vorresti.’ Mad. Cinti Damoreau. ~Hasse.~

Chorus, ‘When his loud voice.’ (_Jephtha._) ~Handel.~

~Act II.~

Overture. (_Samson._) ~Handel.~

Song, ‘How willing my paternal love.’ Mr. Parry. ~Handel.~

(_Samson._)

Glee, ‘O’er desert plains.’ ~H. Waelrent.~

Recit, ‘Ye sacred priests.’ Song, ‘Farewell, ye ~Handel.~

limpid.’ Mrs. Knyvett. (_Jephtha._)

Madrigal, ‘Now is the month of Maying.’ ~Morley.~

Recit. ‘My prayers are heard.’ Song, ‘Tears such ~Handel.~

as tender.’ Mr. Phillips. (_Deborah._)

Chorus, ‘Fall’n is the foe.’ (_Judas Macc._) ~Handel.~

Song, ‘Confusa, abbandonata.’ Mad. Cinti Damoreau ~Bach.~

Chorus, ‘The many rend.’ (_Alexander’s Feast._) ~Handel.~

Vain the search after the name of Haydn or Mozart in a concert selected

by his Highness of Cumberland! And as to Beethoven’s, the mere sound

of it in the royal director’s ear would be as the piercing, the

threatening din of the revolutionary tocsin. The illustrious Duke is

perhaps quite right--we, possibly, quite wrong; but it seems to us

that a discreet mixture of modern music (not by _living_ composers)

with that of older date, would be highly to the advantage of both,

particularly in a programme consisting of from eighteen to twenty

pieces--a number which almost unavoidably must be felt oppressive,

unless that variety, which can only be found in composers of

widely-distant periods, is as much an object of attention as contrast

in the species, sentiment, and keys of the pieces brought together.

But though there was a want of a due admixture of schools in the

present concert, the music was the choicest of its kind. The Anthem

composed for the Duke of Chandos (Pope’s Timon) is one of Handel’s

best, the only weak part being the overture. The lovely air, ‘O come,

let us worship,’ is rather beyond Mr. Vaughan’s voice, as it now is:

with a note or two more in compass, and a small increase of strength,

he would have rendered it more effective. We felt some regret that the

melodious fugue, ‘Tell it out among the heathen,’ and the gentle, the

charming air, ‘O magnify the Lord,’ so well adapted to Mrs. Knyvett’s

powers, were not included. The vocal parts of the Frost scene were

taken rather too slow: and a little more point, more emphasis, in

the chiding air, ‘Thou doating fool!’ would much have improved it,

otherwise this fine specimen of the great English master’s dramatic

music was very successfully performed. The Concerto was executed in

a manner peculiar to the Ancient Concert band, the conductor and

leader of which, and a few others among its members, possess the true

tradition of the author’s times and style. We would not exchange one

bar of the largo in ~B~ minor, as played by F. Cramer, for all

the _Friars’ Chants_ and _Witches’ Dances_ that adroit charlatanerie

can produce, or good-humoured credulity applaud. _Mad Bess_ pleased us

much, both as part of the present concert and by exciting agreeable

recollections: we admire Miss Stephens as she is and remember, with

unalloyed satisfaction, what she was. The piano-forte accompaniment,

too, deserves honourable mention,--so modest, so judicious! The

Madrigal is a _chef d’œuvre_; it was sung by Mrs. Knyvett, Messrs.

Terrail, Vaughan, Phillips, and Sale, in the chastest and most perfect

manner. Warm as we are in our admiration of the madrigalists of the

sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, we still must acknowledge that

this lovely work of the elder Linley, by surpassing all that preceded

it, proves the advance of the art; though, unfortunately, the kind of

composition not having been encouraged, little has been gained by the

exertion of his genius.

Hasse’s fine Bravura was sung with a neatness of execution which none

ever yet exceeded. The most difficult passages proved mere playwork to

Mad. Cinti, and she added to them others of her own,--very appropriate

ones though,--to show how much more than equal she is to the task

assigned to her. Her strength is not great, but the flexibility of her

voice is surprising; and her knowledge, not merely of her own part, but

of the whole of the score, is apparent in whatever she performs.

The Chorus from _Jephtha_ wanted more support from the trebles. We

advise the conductor in future to break through the trammels of custom,

and accompany the point of the fugue, ‘They now contract,’ with the

diapasons and principals only; that is, to spare us the mixture stops,

which scream most abominably when only covered by a few sopranos.

Mr. Parry’s song from _Samson_ was quietly and delicately sung. The

glee, ‘O’er desert plains,’ could not have had more justice done it,

but this really is little better than a psalm-tune. What a pity that

the beautiful verses of Shenstone have never yet been wedded to more

congenial music! The Recitative, ‘Ye sacred priests,’ was delivered

with great judgment, and the following air, ‘Farewell!’ could not

have been more delicately sung: it were, however, to be wished that

the shakes, transmitted from one singer to another, could be lessened

in number as they pass. And the cadence, another incumbrance, had

better be at once repudiated; it is an ancient abomination, which now

the English alone practise. Morley’s Madrigal is, both in melody and

harmony, free as air--all hilarity, and not a glimpse of pedantry.

The chorus should have repeated _each_ stanza, and not, as on the

present occasion, have been employed only in the last. Mr. Phillips,

in the song from _Deborah_, was very nearly perfect. Bartleman in

this was perfection itself; and so will our excellent living singer

be, when he has acquired the deep pathos, the experience of his

predecessor. In voice he has a manifest advantage; and this is not his

only superiority. The aria, a bravura of _John Christian_ Bach, (the

Christian names should have been added,) has all the prettiness, and

not a little of the weakness, of the composer, who, of the many sons

of John Sebastian Bach, is least worthy of the name. It was executed

with the utmost neatness, but not sung _con amore_. In fact, it has

nothing in it to excite any ardour in a singer possessing Mad. Cinti’s

knowledge and taste.

EIGHTH CONCERT,

_Under the Direction of the Earl Fortescue, Wednesday,_

_May 8, 1833._

~Act I.~

Overture. (_Esther._) ~Handel.~

Madrigal, ‘The silver swan.’ ~Gibbons.~

Recit., ‘Be comforted.’ Song, ‘The Lord.’ (_Judas ~Handel.~

Maccabeus._)

Concerto 2nd. ~Corelli.~

Recit., ‘If I give thee.’ Song, ‘Let me wander.’ ~Handel.~

Chorus, ‘And young and old.’ (_L’Allegro._)

Quartet, ‘Sing unto God.’ Chorus, ‘Cry aloud.’ ~Croft and

Greatorex.~

Glee, ‘As now the shades.’ ~Dr. Cooke.~

Double Chorus, ‘Immortal Lord.’ (_Deborah._) ~Handel.~

~Act II.~

Chaconne and Requiem ~Jomelli.~

Recit., ‘No more in Sion.’ Song, ‘Wise men, ~Handel.~

flatt’ring.’ (_Judas Maccabeus._)

Madrigal. ‘Dissi all’ amata mia.’ ~Luca

Marenzio.~

Chorus, ‘Let none despair.’ (_Hercules._) ~Handel.~

Concerto in ~G~. Avison.

Quartet and Chorus, ‘Then round about the starry ~Handel.~

throne.’ (_Samson._)

Recit., ‘Justly these evils.’ Song, ‘Why does the ~Handel.~

God.’ (_Samson._)

Chorus, ‘Sing unto God.’ (_Judas Maccabeus._) ~Handel.~

The overture to _Esther_ and Corelli’s concerto belong to a school

which has always been protected and exhibited to the best advantage

in these concerts; both were now performed in their true spirit. The

_immortal_ chorus from _Deborah_ is a composition which can only

receive justice in this orchestra: the great number of vocal performers

collected at our grand provincial meetings certainly give more force to

it, but are unable to perform it with that precision, that nicety, on

which its effect so mainly depends. We never hear the passage where the

voices take up the point, ‘to swift perdition,’ accurately executed but

at the Ancient Concerts. The song from _Judas Maccabeus_ is generally

considered to be one of Handel’s happiest thoughts; but it rolls and

rumbles so much, and the base instruments are so continually in unison

with the voice--a defect not peculiar to this composer, but to the

period in which he wrote--that the only pleasure which it affords us is

entirely attributable to the singer, provided that singer be Phillips.

Dr. Cooke’s lovely and most masterly glee was a decided failure: it is

not at all suited to Mrs. Bishop; her school is of a totally different

kind. To Mrs. W. Knyvett this should have been assigned.

The ‘Requiem’ and ‘Agnus Dei’ of Jomelli did not find the choral

performers quite at home in their parts, although their occasional

want of confidence was only discernible to very experienced and close

observers. How ingenious, how effective, and yet how simple, the whole

of the base accompaniment to the first movement, the Requiem! Not

less admirable, but in another style, is the ‘Agnus Dei,’ and full

of original melody, which is still new, because, fortunately, never

yet imitated. The fugue, too, at ‘Lux æterna,’ is of that kind which,

while its musical learning is as indisputable as great, possesses the

superior merit of being pleasing. Mrs. Bishop is not yet familiar with

Handel; her ‘Wise men, flatt’ring’ was not what it doubtless will be

when she is become more accustomed to this music--though it was far

from displeasing. It is much to be wished that the singer would have

the courage to get rid of about two-thirds of the shakes which the

composer himself, we admit, has written. We are certainly bound by

the author’s text, which is permanent, but not by his embellishments,

which belonged only to the age that produced them. A singer in the

present day who should venture to introduce the _double relish_ and

the _back-fall_ of the seventeenth century,--both of which, as

well as other ‘graceless graces,’ are constantly found in the old

writers,--would be laughed at for his scrupulous adherence to the

original. The madrigal of Luca Marenzio is still fresh, and exceedingly

elegant; its only fault is want of modulation. The performance of this

did great credit to the singers. The fine chorus from _Hercules_ was

executed in a most perfect manner. So was the charming quartet from

_Samson_. Here science is turned to the best account: none but a great

musician could have worked out such effects, yet the whole is free from

every thing that smells of the lamp. It is the true offspring of genius

highly cultivated. We are old-fashioned enough in our taste to be

pleased with Avison’s concerto, the _soli_ parts in which were nicely

played by Mori, (in the absence of F. Cramer,) who was ably seconded

by the band, and most judiciously supported by the organ, which Mr.

W. Knyvett always manages with taste and discretion. The song from

_Samson_ is beyond Mr. Horncastle’s physical powers, and only fit for

such a voice and such energy as Braham possesses. Indeed, we so little

like its incessant divisions, and especially the puerile attempt to

give expression to the word ‘thunder,’ that we should not repine were

we never to hear it again.

NINTH CONCERT,

_Under the Direction of Lord Burghersh, for the Archbishop of York,_

_Wednesday, May 15, 1833._

~Act I.~

Anthem, ‘O sing unto the Lord.’ (_Sixth._) ~Handel.~

Recit., ‘When he is in his wrath.’ Song, ‘When ~Handel.~

storms the proud.’ Chorus, ‘O Judah, boast.’

(_Athalia._)

Quartetto, ‘Come! ohimè!’ (_Nina._) ~Paisiello.~

Concerto 4th. (_Oboe._) ~Handel.~

Recit., ‘Tranquillo io son.’ Song, ‘Ombra adorata.’ ~Zingarelli.~

(_Romeo e Giul._)

Ode, ‘Hence, all ye vain delights.’ ~Webbe.~

Duetto, ‘Son io desto.’ (_Nina._) ~Paisiello.~

Chorus, ‘Kyrie eleison.’ ~Beethoven.~

~Act II.~

Overture. (_Idomeneo._) ~Mozart.~

Recit., ‘Crudele!’ Song, ‘Ho perduto.’ ~Paisiello.~

Glee, ‘Bird of the wilderness.’ ~Clarke and

Greatorex.~

Recit., ‘’Tis done!’ Song, ‘Heart, the seat.’ (_Acis ~Handel.~

and Galatea._)

Magnificat. ~Mozart.~

Song, ‘Amor se nume,’ ~Scarlatti.~

Double Chorus, ‘From the censer.’ ~Handel.~

This was a very fine concert, for the music was well chosen, both as

regards diversity of school and contrast in style. An infusion of

Mozart and Beethoven as moderns, of Paisiello and Zingarelli who may

be said to belong to the middle age, and of Handel and Scarlatti as

of the ancient class, produced a mixture that suited every taste, and

presented a fair prospect of great amelioration in the system by which

these concerts are regulated.

The selection from Handel’s anthem made an excellent beginning; we

should have been glad to hear the whole of it, for it is one of his

best. The scene from _Athalia_ is a good specimen of that fine but

comparatively little known oratorio, the magnificent air in which,

‘When storms the proud,’ is exactly suited to Mr. Phillips, who sang

it admirably. Paisiello’s delicate quartet was not very thoroughly

understood by all the parties engaged in it, nevertheless it proved

very satisfactory to the audience. Madame Pasta, who made her first

appearance here this season, was as great as usual in the calmly

impressive scena from _Romeo_; and in the air, ‘Ho perduto,’ gave every

advantage to the work of a composer who ought again to be brought

forward. The song, as it is called, of _Alessandro_ Scarlatti produced

quite a surprise. Who ever supposed that an air of so much beauty

could have remained thus long unknown in a concert established for the

preservation of ancient music? Who ever imagined that a composition

upwards of a century old could exhibit so many of the best features

of the modern school, that it might be mistaken for the work of

Haydn or Mozart? To Signor Rubini we are, it is said, indebted for

the introduction of this antique gem, and he placed it in a highly

favourable light by his manner of performing it, which, for him, was

remarkably chaste.

The _Ode_ (a much better term for it than _glee_) to Melancholy is one

of Webbe’s _chefs-d’œuvre_, and shows how well that great composer

understood the words. It was most perfectly sung by Miss Stephens, Mrs.

Knyvett, Messrs. Terrail, Vaughan, Elliot, and Sale. Miss Stephens, in

the song from _Acis and Galatea_, pleased as usual by her captivating

simplicity. The Magnificat of Mozart was well performed, and a very

grand work it is. The concerto of Handel, every part of which abounds

in beautiful melody, and not less masterly, though not extraneous

harmony, was most ably executed. The two fugues in this prove how

possible it is to unite the learned and the agreeable. The andante of

it is delicious, and here the oboe is rendered almost vocal; as is the

bassoon in the last movement. The _Kyrie_ of Beethoven wanted rather

more rehearsing; and the overture to _Idomeneo_ required the immense

power of the Philharmonic band; nevertheless it produced considerable

effect. But the stupendous chorus from _Solomon_ was perfect, though

wasted as a finale.

TENTH CONCERT,

_Under the Direction of the Earl of Cawdor, Wednesday,_ _May 22, 1833._

~Act I.~

Overture. (_Ariadne._) ~Handel.~

Recit., ‘Brethren and friends.’ Recit., acc. ‘O thou ~Handel.~

bright orb.’ Chorus, ‘Behold the listening.’

(_Joshua._)

Song, ‘Tyrants would.’ Chorus, ‘Tyrants, ye in vain.’ ~Handel.~

(_Athalia._)

Recit., ‘Now strike.’ Chorus, ‘Break his bands.’ ~Handel.~

Recit., ‘Hark! hark!’ Song, ‘Revenge! revenge!’

(_Alex. Feast._)

Concerto 11th. ~Handel.~

Song, ‘Di quel sublime.’ ~Gluck.~

Glee, ‘See the chariot.’ ~Horsley.~

Recit, ‘Chi per pietà.’ Song, ‘Deh! parlate.’ ~Cimarosa.~

Chorus, ‘Gird on thy sword.’ (_Saul._) ~Handel.~

~Act II.~

Symphony. (_Jupiter._) ~Mozart.~

Recit., ‘Ecco il punto.’ Song, ‘Non più di fiori.’ ~Mozart.~

(_La Clemenza di Tito._)

Glee, ‘Chi mai d’ iniqua stella.’ ~Bononcini.~

Movement from the Lessons. ~Handel.~

Recit., ‘’Tis greater far.’ Song, ‘Pluck root and ~Handel.~

branch.’ Recit., ‘Our souls.’ Chorus, ‘Shall we

the God.’ (_Esther._)

Song and Quartet, ‘Fairest isle.’ ~Purcell.~

Anthem, ‘My heart is inditing.’ ~Handel.~

The overture to _Ariadne_ owes its chief attraction to the graceful

minuet with which it concludes, and this we cannot but think is

commonly played too slow at the Ancient Concert. _Andante_ in Handel’s

time was a term indicating greater quickness than it is now understood

to imply. The recitative, ‘O, thou bright orb!’ contains that risible

attempt to describe the arrest of the sun’s course by a long holding

note. The chorus, however, is a masterly work, but the voices were

not now very firm in it. Mrs. Bishop succeeded well in the air from

_Athalia_. The accompanied recitative, ‘Hark! the horrid sound!’ was

delivered in Mr. Braham’s energetic manner; and the following song,

one of the most striking proofs of the composer’s genius, is foremost

among Mr. Phillips’s triumphs. The air of Gluck was a novelty, and of

no ordinary merit. Set to the same words that afterwards exercised

the genius of Mozart,--in _La Clemenza di Tito_--it not only bears a

comparison with an admired air of the latter, but in our opinion was

superior to it. Mr. Braham, at whose recommendation we believe it was

introduced, entered thoroughly into the composer’s design, and gave

the true effect to this. But, having an unquenchable antipathy to

concerted cadences, we would willingly have spared the two, between the

voice and trumpet, added on this occasion. The glee, ‘See the chariot

at hand,’ was sung with great correctness. Madame Malibran’s scena

and aria of Cimarosa was a most unequal performance: some parts were

beyond all praise; others proved the uncertainty of her judgment. Her

semitonic passages, neither to be found in the author nor in any way in

keeping with his style, were a most unhappy evidence of her occasional

want of taste and discrimination; and the _broderies_ she introduced,

though not so abundant as is common with her, were misplaced: but her

recitative was admirable, and, with the exceptions we have mentioned,

the aria was not less splendidly sung. We have heard ‘Gird on thy

sword’ better executed: there was a want of shortness in the staccato

passages; and in some others the whole band seemed deficient in

confidence. The concerto of Handel--a composition which might furnish

ample materials for half a dozen of modern growth--was the most perfect

performance of the kind we ever heard. This is in fact a violin

concerto, and Mori (who led for F. Cramer) played it in a manner that

words cannot describe or do justice to. His two cadences, of modest

length,--in one of which was an arpeggio, that Paganini, whose chief

excellence is in _arpeggiando_, could not surpass--moved even this

audience to a general expression of applause.

In the scena from Mozart’s _Tito_, Madame Malibran again exhibited

her vast powers and unrestrained confidence in her own opinion. The

declamatory part of this was superb, though a little hurried; and

the immense compass of her voice gave an effect to the air, that, we

are almost inclined to say, has never been equalled. But though the

conductor took care that the latter opened in the exact time, the

singer thought fit to change the movement, and most injudiciously to

convert a _larghetto_ (as marked) into an _andante_. Mr. Knyvett should

have shown his independence by checking this, and his respect for the

author by insisting on maintaining the time in which he set out. Who,

in the name of reason, metamorphosed the _round_ for three voices,

‘Chi mai d’ iniqua stella,’ into a _glee_ for four? This should, of

course, be sung by equal voices, one coming in after the other, as the

author intended, or else the original design is entirely defeated. The

‘Movement from the Lessons’ is a charming orchestral arrangement of

Handel’s lovely air in ~E~, (vulgarly called _The Harmonious

Blacksmith_,) made in excellent taste by the late Mr. Greatorex. The

selection from _Esther_ was not interesting, and the remainder of the

concert demands no further observation. The room was much fuller than

it has hitherto been during the present season.

PHILHARMONIC CONCERTS.

FIFTH CONCERT, Monday, April 29, 1833.

~Act I.~

Sinfonia, No. 3 ~Spohr.~

Aria, ‘Per questa belle mano.’ (Mr. Parry, jun.) ~Mozart.~

Concerto Harp. (Mr. T. Wright.) ~Hummel.~

Duetto, ‘Che al mio bene.’ (Mrs. Wood and Mr. ~Mayer.~

Braham.)

Overture. (_Der Freischütz._) ~C. M. von

Weber.~

~Act II.~

Sinfonia, No. 2. ~Beethoven.~

Scena, ‘Per pietà.’ (Mr. Braham.) ~Beethoven.~

Concerto Violoncello. (Herr Knoop.) ~Kummer.~

Scena, ‘Sì lo sento.’ (Mrs. Wood.) _Faust._ ~Spohr.~

Overture. (_Zaira._) ~Winter.~

Leader, Mr. Loder.--Conductor, Mr. T. Cooke.

Spohr’s symphony in ~E~ flat is richer in melody and more free

from that complication which smells so much of the lamp--from that

labour which fatigues the hearer as much as it did the composer,

than any one of his instrumental works. His designs are here clearly

expressed and readily understood, and we listen to the whole with

pleasure, without feeling that any part of it has been too long. It was

most accurately performed, as was also Beethoven’s, in ~D~, one

of his clearest and most beautiful orchestral productions, sparkling

with genius from beginning to end. The calmly grand opening induces us

to hope for much, nevertheless the exquisite larghetto surpasses all

that had been anticipated. Nor are the scherzo and trio less striking

in another style. The overture to the _Freischütz_ went off admirably.

The last, Winter’s, we did not hear.

Mr. Wright played Hummel’s celebrated piano-forte concerto in ~E~,

arranged for the harp, and executed it in an able manner. Herr Knoop

comes from the city of our queen, Meiningen, and was recommended to

the notice of the society by his majesty. To do extraordinary things

seems to be the object of his ambition, and that to which his labours

have chiefly been directed; he therefore can run thirds and octaves

with vast celerity and neatness, and play with his left hand close

to the bridge, bringing out sounds too high for even a rational

violinist to attempt. But this is to please, or at least to surprise,

the mob of gentlemen who hear but cannot judge. His tone, the first

consideration, is nasal in what we call the legitimate notes of the

instrument, and hard in the highest. His taste is not bad, but he has

very little of it; and in expression, the vivifying principle of music,

he is quite deficient. In short, execution appears to be the god of

his idolatry, at whose altar he has sacrificed--if we may judge from a

single hearing--nearly all that we consider valuable in the art. The

composition he played has been extolled: in our opinion it has very

little merit, except of a negative kind. We, however, were very glad to

hear him; so we believe were all present, for he was new; and moreover,

he has not thrown our own Lindley into shade, but, on the contrary,

taught us to value him more highly.

The vocal part of this concert did not prove very successful. Mr.

Parry, jun. sang Mozart’s aria very well, but it did not excite much

interest. The duet of Mayer has not strength enough for these concerts,

and Mr. Braham was not in good voice, the influenza had just commenced

an attack on him, by which he was afterwards confined. This state of

health of course operated in the scena of Beethoven, much of which,

we may also add, is hardly vocal, especially the cacophonous run of

semitones. The company were so exhausted by the unreasonable length

of _Herr_ Knoop’s concerto, that they left Mrs. Wood to sing the

fine scena from _Faust_ to few more than the orchestra by which she

was accompanied. Upon the whole, then, it must be confessed that the

present performance was not of the most brilliant kind.

SIXTH CONCERT, Monday, May 13, 1833.

~Act I.~

Sinfonia, No. VII. ~Haydn.~

Aria, Signor Rubini, ‘O cara immagine.’ (_Il Flauto ~Mozart.~

Magico_)

Concerto, Piano-forte (in ~D~ minor), Mr. ~Mozart.~

Mendelssohn Bartholdy

Aria, Madame Cinti Damoreau, ‘Deh vieni, non ~Mozart.~

tardar,’ (_Le Nozze di Figaro_)

Overture, _Bibiana_ ~Pixis.~

~Act II.~

Sinfonia, MS., composed expressly for this Society, ~F. Mendelssohn

and first time of performance Bartholdy.~

Duetto, Madame Cinti Damoreau and Signor Rubini, ~Rossini.~

‘Ricciardo che veggo!’ (_Ricciardo e Zoraide_)

Concerto Violin, M. De Beriot ~De Beriot.~

Aria, Madame Cinti Damoreau, ‘En vain j’espère’ ~Meyerbeer.~

(_Robert le Diable_)

Jubilee Overture ~C. M. von

Weber.~

Leader, Mr. Weichsel.--Conductor, Mr. Mendelssohn Bartholdy.

Whatever defects were apparent in the fifth Concert, were fully atoned

for by the sixth, in which the most fastidious critic could find only

one piece of a doubtful kind, and but one that was not performed in a

perfect manner.

Haydn’s symphony, in ~D~, is too generally known and admired to need

any remark. M. Mendelssohn’s, composed in pursuance of a resolution

of this Society, by which he was requested to write a symphony,

overture, and vocal piece, on liberal terms, is a composition that will

endure for ages, if we may presume to judge such a work on a single

performance. The first movement, an allegro vivace, in ~A~, without

any slow opening, speaks at once the highly excited state of the

author’s imagination, and the fine flow of his animal spirits, when he

wrote it: so full of brilliant conceptions is this, and so rapid their

succession, that it would be a hopeless attempt to analyse it without

either having heard it several times, or having the score to refer to.

We may say the same of the finale, which has this peculiarity--that it

is in the minor of the key in which the symphony commences. The slow

movement in ~D~ minor is not less distinguished by ingenuity of a very

rare description, and beauty of the most discernible kind, than by its

undisputed, unquestionable originality: this was loudly encored. The

scherzo, in ~A~, and trio, in ~E~, shew genius of a high order in every

bar. And, to be brief, the manner in which the whole work was received,

by the most critical, the best qualified audience that London (now full

of eminent foreign musicians) could assemble, bears us out in what we

have said, and would justify us were we to add still more in praise of

this masterly production.

The Overture by M. Pixis, now performed for the first time here, begins

in a promising manner, with some good harmony, well distributed among

the wind instruments; but as it proceeds, it falls off most lamentably,

and the greater part of the composition is nothing but noise without

design or order, and really seemed to us as if written for that fair

which is annually held on the site of Smithfield market.

The performance of Mozart’s Concerto by M. Mendelssohn was perfect. The

scrupulous exactness with which he gave the author’s text, without a

single addition or _new reading_ of his own, the precision in his time,

together with the extraordinary accuracy of his execution, excited the

admiration of all present; and this was increased, almost to rapture,

by his two extemporaneous cadences, in which he _adverted_ with great

address to the subjects of the concerto, and wrought up his audience

almost to the same pitch of enthusiasm which he himself had arrived at.

The whole of this concerto he played from memory.

A not less admirable performance was M. De Beriot’s on the violin. As

a composition, his concerto, in ~B~ minor, is entitled to high and

unqualified praise; his subjects are new, pleasing, and skilfully

treated, and his instrumentation, the orchestral parts of his work,

prove him to be a most able musician: but his execution of this indeed

‘beggars description.’ Words cannot convey a just notion of the fulness

and beauty of his tone, the certainty of his double, his triple, stops,

the truth of his harmonics,--which, useless as they are, he introduced,

we conclude, merely to show his power--the brilliancy of his execution,

and the delicacy of his taste. We certainly never heard the violin so

played, and the only fault we have to find with M. de Beriot is, that

he condescended to introduce once, it not twice, certain _pizzicato_

notes, and thus seemed to sanction a piece of quackery which he must

despise. The room rung with the plaudits he drew forth, and it is said

to be the intention of the directors to engage M. de Beriot for the

eighth concert, being the last.

Signor Rubini refrained, as much as with him is possible, from

roulades in the aria of Mozart, and his alternations of fortissimo

and pianissimo were more moderate; indeed, he pretty nearly equalized

his tones; but this is the only commendation we can bestow on his

performance of ‘O Cara Immagine.’ In his duet with Mad. Cinti, his

passionate style told better; and here again he spared us those bursts

by which he caricatures so much of what is assigned to him. Mad. Cinti

was delightful in the aria from _Figaro_. A universal encore of this

proved how completely she had charmed her audience. She was not less

excellent in the air of Meyerbeer, though this did not tell so well as

the other. In fact the concert was long, and many people were moving

off to evening parties.

EXTRACTS FROM THE DIARY OF A DILETTANTE.

[Resumed from page 109.]

_April 28th._ One of the greatest _prôneurs_ of Signor Paganini has

been the editor of _La Revue Musicale_; but in his last number,

speaking of this artist’s recent performance in Paris, he says,

Paganini was not on the present occasion equal to what he has been, and

it appeared to us that he was not quite satisfied with himself. Is it

not more likely that the fit of enthusiasm, excited by novelty, or by a

well got up exhibition, is giving way to dispassionate observation and

cool criticism?

* * * * *

_May 6th._ England is about to possess one of the finest rooms, and the

largest and most powerful organ in Europe. What the other qualities of

the latter will be, remains to be proved. But the metropolis of the

kingdom will not have to boast of these advantages, the credit of them

will belong to a provincial town, to Birmingham, where a townhall is

nearly finished, the interior of which is 140 feet long, 65 wide, and

65 high. In this is to be placed--chiefly for the use of the musical

festivals there to be held for the benefit of the General Hospital--the

organ alluded to, the following description of which accompanies a

lithographic print of the gigantic instrument now building.

The organ case will be forty feet wide and forty-five feet high.

The largest metal diapason pipe is to be five feet three inches in

circumference, and thirty-five feet in height. The largest wood

diapason pipe will measure in the interior upwards of two hundred

cubic feet. In the full organ are to be ten open diapasons, and all

the other parts must be in calculated proportion to this. There will

be sixty draw-stops, and five sets of keys. To supply so stupendous

an instrument with wind will require many sets of bellows, the whole

superficial measure of which will exceed three hundred and eighty feet.

And to give, if it can be fairly estimated, some further idea of the

magnitude of this organ, it may be stated, that its weight will amount

to upwards of forty tons.

It was intended to open this grand hall, and still grander organ, in

the autumn of the present year; but to prevent any injurious haste in

the completion of the building and of the instrument, the grand musical

festival, which will prove to the county of Warwick that it possesses

one of the most splendid rooms, and the most magnificent organ in the

world, is deferred till October, 1834.

* * * * *

_8th._ In the bill of the Ancient Concert this evening is an odd

junction,--‘The _Chaconne_ and _Requiem_ of ~Jomelli~.’ It should have

been _Overture_ only, this including the Chaconne; and neither have

any connection whatever with the _Requiem_, though they make a very

good introduction to it. In future, let us hope that the name of a

ballet-tune will not be coupled with the _Missa pro defunctis_; unless

it be intended to have a musical as well as graphic _Dance of Death_.

* * * * *

_11th._ The Glee Club this day decreed their prize for the best

cheerful glee to Mr. Hawes. Last week, Mr. Goss obtained the prize for

a serious glee.

* * * * *

---- This day died a singer, not unknown to fame in her day, Mrs.

Dickons, who, at nearly the close of the last century, held rather

a prominent station as a performer, both on the stage and in the

concert-room. This lady manifested a decided talent for music at a

very early age, and at eleven years of age, her father, Mr. Poole,

placed her under Rauzzini. At thirteen, the Court Journal tells us, she

appeared at Vauxhall; but no notice is taken of this in the account

given of her in the Dictionary of Musicians, the heads of which were

probably furnished by her direction. Afterwards, but at what exact

time I am not aware, she was placed under Mr. John Ashley, jun., who

instructed her generally in music, and through the interest of his

father she was allowed to sing at the Ancient Concerts.

In 1793, she appeared for the first time on the stage, in the character

of _Ophelia_, and afterwards, progressively, had many principal vocal

parts assigned to her; for though her style of singing was far from

refined, it was correct; and though her voice wanted fulness, and was

reedy, yet her intonation was perfect, her knowledge of music gave her

a firmness that few possessed, and she could be relied on both for

ability and punctuality.

Miss Poole married a Mr. Dickons in 1800, and retired from the stage,

finally, as she supposed, but her union did not prove so happy as

she had reason to expect, and she returned to her public employment,

and was engaged at the King’s Theatre, where she performed as second

to Madame Catalani, who, in 1816, engaged her at the Théâtre Italién

in Paris, (then on lease to Madame C.) as prima donna, where I heard

her in two or three characters. Her success was such as a second-rate

singer has a right to expect from a polite audience; she was listened

to with much attention, some applause, but not, after her debut, by

very numerous auditors. I was present at her first performance, and

immediately discovered Madame C.’s design in engaging an English

vocalist who could never be her rival. Mrs. D. only made a very few

attempts in Paris, then retired. She was subsequently engaged at

Venice, also at one or two other cities in Italy; and on her return to

England, was engaged by Mr. Harris, at Covent Garden Theatre, where

she made her appearance as _Rosina_, in Rossini’s _Barber of Seville_,

adapted to English words. In 1818, she finally abandoned all public

employment, and shortly after was attacked by a cancerous disease, from

which she never recovered, though paralysis was the immediate cause

of her death. Mrs. Dickons was much respected by the public, for she

maintained a most irreproachable character, and was not less beloved

by her friends for all those qualities which contribute so largely to

social happiness.

* * * * *

_14th._ The premium of twenty pounds annually given by the noblemen and

gentlemen of the Catch-club, for the best glee, was this day awarded to

Mr. Walmisley. The candidates were but few, and the prize was decided

by a majority of one vote only; Mr. Walmisley’s composition having

nineteen in its favour, and Mr. T. Cooke’s eighteen. None are allowed

to become candidates for this prize but the professional members of

the club, the competition therefore is confined in a narrow sphere; an

evil, certainly, but unavoidable, for were there no limit, more glees

would be sent in than could by any possibility be tried without an

expense both of time and money that no club could support.

* * * * *

_20th._ The Directors of the Ancient Concert have announced their

determination respecting those performances in future; or at least for

next season. The plan and conditions are as follow:--

‘That there be Eight Concerts, to take place every alternate Wednesday

from the commencement of the season, with the exception of the usual

recess during Passion and Easter weeks.

‘That the Subscription be Six Guineas for Subscribers retaining the

privilege of attending Rehearsals; Five Guineas for those who do not.

‘That the transfer of tickets between Father and Sons, and between

Brothers, also between Mother and Daughters, and between Sisters, be

allowed.

‘That the Subscribers retain the same privilege, as during the present

season, of recommending for single tickets for the evening.

‘In order to carry on the Concerts on the same scale as heretofore,

and with the same vocal and instrumental power and excellence, it is

necessary that the number of Subscribers should not be less than 500.

The Directors therefore give notice, that if, on the 1st of February,

1834, the Subscribers reported to Messrs. ~Lonsdale~ and ~Mills~, of

140, New Bond Street, do not amount to that number, the Concerts will

be discontinued.’

Let us hope that what is here proposed will be successful in upholding

an institution on which the preservation of good music in this country

no much depends. To the study of the ancient masters the great modern

composers confessedly owed their knowledge; these introduced a new

style in instrumental music, undoubtedly, and extended the limits

of modulation, but the foundation was prepared for them, and no one

has established a permanent reputation who has not built on this. In

the words, therefore, of Fra Paoli, I pray for its continuation and

prosperity:--_Esto perpetua!_

FOREIGN MUSICAL REPORT.

VIENNA.

_Hofoperntheater._--The opera _Ferdinand Cortez_ has been reproduced,

with M. Wild as _Telasco_, Madame Ernst as _Amazily_, and M. Breiting

as _Cortez_; the minor characters were also well sustained. Donizetti’s

_Anna Bolena_ has also been given, and with even greater success than

at the _Josephstadttheater_.

At the _Hofburgtheater_ a new oratorio by the organist Assmayr has

been performed; it displays great ability, and the music is eminently

expressive of the words; it was well received.

At the first and second of the _Concerts Spirituels_ have been given

a symphony of Mozart composed for the Concerts Spirituels in Paris in

the year 1778, Vogler’s overture to _Castor and Pollux_, a mass by

Cherubini, symphony in ~C~ minor by Beethoven, chorus from _Jephtha_ by

Handel, a new _Te Deum_, a sterling composition, by Tomascheck, &c. &c.

For the third and fourth concerts were announced Beethoven’s symphony

in ~B~, the ninth psalm of Fesca, Weber’s Jubilee overture, the Abbé

Vogler’s Litany, Mozart’s symphony in ~E~♭, chorus and fugue from the

oratorio _Der Tod Jesu_ by Graun, Beethoven’s festival overture, and

the _Gloria_ from the second mass of Cherubini.

The annual concert at the Conservatory of Music, to display the

progress of the pupils, took place a short time since, when their

performance of Mozart’s symphony in ~D~, and the meritorious efforts of

the vocalists, gave great satisfaction.

A concert of a brilliant character was recently given by the horn

virtuoso, M. Lewy; he was assisted by Demlle. Heinefetter, and MM.

Thalberg, Titze, Hürt, and Sachner.

Romberg is at present sojourning here, and has played on the

violoncello at a concert in the _Kärntnerthor Theater_. Age seems to

have produced no effect upon his mighty powers; his reception was

enthusiastic in the extreme.

BERLIN.

Spontini’s opera _Alcidor_, after an undisturbed repose of many

years, was lately reproduced here. Its success was but indifferent,

notwithstanding the laudable exertions of the singers and the splendour

of the scenery and decorations. Dlle. Gerwer is about to leave us; her

place, however, will be supplied, for a short time at least, by Dlle.

Heinefetter.

A. M. Liebrecht, aged thirteen years, a pupil of M. C. M. Möser, has

given a concert here, showing the degree of perfection to which such a

child may attain by assiduous and persevering application; he exhibited

an extraordinary mastery over his instrument--the violin. Shortly

afterwards M. Wagans gave a concert, at which he played a concerto on

the trumpet with a degree of taste and brilliancy calculated to sustain

the fame which he has already acquired. Other concerts have been--that

of the three brothers Gabrielski, in which two of them distinguished

themselves as clever flute players, and the other as an accomplished

pianist; and one at the theatre, at which Dlle. Fürst, from Dresden,

sang; her voice is rather powerful than sweet, and tolerably flexible.

At the Singing Academy the Passion music of St. Matthew the Evangelist,

by Seb. Bach, was performed; and on Good Friday the annual performance

of the oratorio _Der Tod Jesu_ took place before a very crowded

audience; it was subsequently given in the Garrison Church under the

direction of M. Hansmann.

MUNICH.

The performances during the present year have comprised the operas

_Johann von Paris_, _Zauberflöte_, _Figaro_, _Fra Diavolo_, _Der Maurer

and der Schlosser_, (Le Maçon) _Die beyden Füchse_, _Freyschütz_, _Der

Schnee_, &c. The management of Baron von Poissl terminated on the 28th

February, when he was succeeded by M. Küstner.

STRASBURG.

During the last year it was our good fortune to have a German company,

under the direction of M. Carl Bode, exclusively devoted to the opera;

and their productions were therefore comparatively of so perfect a

nature, that the direction of the French theatre was quite unable to

compete with them. They performed during the season, _Fidelio_, _Die

Schweizer Familie_, _Freyschütz_, _Die Weisse Dame_, _Preziosa_, _Die

Stumme von Portici_, _Don Juan_, _Koskiusko_, _Der Dorf Barbier_, (The

Village Barber,) _Tancred_, _Oberon_, _Das Donauweibchen_, (The Nymph

of the Danube,) _Wiener in Berlin_, _Der Kleiner Wilddiebe_, (the

Little Poacher,) _Sargin_, _Zauberflöte_, _Wilhelm Tell_, and _Robert

der Teufel_. Among the company, consisting of about forty members,

the most distinguished were Madame Brauer Düringer, whose principal

characters were _Fidelio_, _Donna Anna_ in _Die Weisse Frau_, _Elvira_

in _Die Stumme_ and in _Don Juan_, _Sophie_ in _Sargin_, _Mathilde_

in _Wilhelm Tell_, _Isabelle_ in _Robert der Teufel_, and _Tancred_.

She has a powerful, rich voice, which is of extraordinary effect in

the concerted pieces, and she sings with much taste. Madame Mayer,

too, was delightful as _Annchen_ in _Der Freyschütz_; in fact, in all

the characters which she sustained. Demlle. Liszevsky also called

forth great admiration as _Emmeline_, _Agathe_, &c; but particularly

as _Jemmy_ in _Wilhelm Tell_, and _Alice_ in _Robert der Teufel_. M.

Wagner, from the Würtzburg Theatre, as principal tenor, was successful

in all his efforts; he sang with equal skill and excellence the high

part of _Sargin_ and the low one of _Don Juan_; as _Robert_ and as

_Arnold_, he has few equals. M. Heisel, as second tenor, was not

without merit. The other singers were MM. Popp, Netz, Krieg, Fischer,

Kaibel, &c. Great credit is due to M. Bode for having by his judicious

management cultivated the taste for classical productions.

With regard to the French theatre, as matters were not going on very

prosperously, the direction was taken out of the hands of M. Deville,

and the company continued to perform to the end of the season on

their own account. Under these circumstances, many new operas were

not to be expected; one only was given, Auber’s _Liebestrank_ (Le

Philtre). The company consisted of Mesdames Lamotte, prima donna,

possessing a rich voice, but often out of tune; Langlade, an agreeable

second singer and excellent actress, Demouchi and Després; M. Vernet,

principal tenor, with a flexible but thin voice. The rest were scarcely

above mediocrity, and the wretched apologies for choruses were below

criticism.

LEIPZIG.

Under the management of M. Friedrich Seb. Ringelhardt, the

_Stadttheater_ has lately enjoyed much of the public favour and

patronage; the music director, too, M. Stegmeyer, is an active young

man and a thorough musician, and the Regisseur, M. Hauser, who is

also a clever musician, is a very good bass singer. M. Eichberger,

the tenor, is excellent. Of the female singers of the establishment

Madame Steinert ranked first; then came, after the departure of Dlle.

Nina Sontag, whose place she supplied, Dlle. Livia Gerhardt. If want

of novelty in the productions has been a fault to be imputed to the

management, for new operas have been scarce, those which we have had

have been given in such a manner as to compensate for what might

otherwise have been a matter of regret. For instance while Madame

Schroeder was here we had _Fidelio_, _Don Juan_, in which she performed

_Donna Anna_, and _Otello_; she was great in them all and efficiently

supported.

Mendelssohn Bartholdy’s overture to Shakspeare’s Midsummer Night’s

Dream, was played for the first time in Leipzig, at a concert for the

benefit of the poor, and received with great applause; on the same

occasion Beethoven’s symphony in A major was given, and M. Poland

played a violin concerto by Pechatschek with delicacy and spirit.

The Euterpe, the season of which is now closed, has given various

symphonies, overtures, and concertos. In the last selection were a new

symphony of M. F. Kähler, Beethoven’s overture to _Egmont_, Weber’s

overture to _Der Beherrscher der Geister_, &c.; M. Sipp placed a violin

concerto of Rode, and M. Faulmann a concerto of Hummel on the Oboe.

Dlle. Henr. Graban gave a concert on the 21st March to a brilliant

audience. The selection was good; among the instrumental pieces was

Marschner’s overture to _Hans Heiling_, which, it is said, will shortly

be produced on our boards.

An interesting sacred performance lately took place in St. Peter’s

church, conducted by the organist, C. F. Becker; the selection

comprised a fugue by Handel, and fugues and choral subjects with

variations by Sebastian Bach.

PRAGUE.

Gretry’s _Blaubart_ (Bluebeard) has been once more produced here for

the benefit of M. Strataky, and experienced a favourable reception,

notwithstanding the fact that the whole of the characters were not well

sustained. Demlle. Lutzer however as _Maria_ was all that could be

desired; her voice has acquired increased strength, and she may soon

prove a dangerous rival to the gifted Madame Podhorsky. _Zampa_ has

also been given again, and _Die Unbekannte_. The performance of the old

opera, _Der Lustige Schuster_ (the Merry Cobbler), was attended with

little success. Demlle. Lutzer has lately performed _Zerlina_ in _Fra

Diavolo_, _Helena_ in _Das Fraulein am See_, _Desdemona_, _Semiramis_,

_the Princess of Navarre_, and _Camilla_ in _Zampa_, in which latter

opera she shone particularly.

There has been a concert given by the pianiste Dlle. Nina Trenkler;

one by the pupils of the Conservatory of Music; and a third by M. J.

B. Hüttner, the professor of that institution: they were all good and

attractive.

FRANKFORT.

Aloys Schmidt’s opera, _Valeria_, was given here for the first time

a few weeks ago. Although the opera displays some beautiful original

ideas, it also abounds in reminiscences of Beethoven, Cherubini,

Mozart, &c.; it was very successful.

CASSEL.

Motives of economy, and the state of affairs in the grand duchy

of Hesse-Cassel, have occasioned the breaking up of the musical

establishment of the chapel, and the closing of the court theatre. The

consequence of this suppression is distressing to the artists, who were

quite unprepared for such an event. Our celebrated composer, Spohr, is

thus deprived of a very lucrative appointment. The greater part of the

performers, instrumental and vocal, are dispersed, and endeavouring

to find in the different German courts those resources which they are

deprived of here. This is an unfortunate occurrence for the musical

art, for the ducal chapel was one of the best-organised establishments

in Germany.

WEIMAR.

The celebrated Hummel has just received the decoration of the order of

the White Eagle from the hands of the Grand Duke. All Germany applauds

this mark of distinction conferred on a great musician who is a living

honour to his country. M. Hummel has just set out for London, where

he is engaged to direct the German opera at the King’s Theatre. It is

said that he is to receive a thousand pounds for his services, and his

travelling expenses. [The Weimar editor is much misinformed on this

subject.]

MEININGEN.

An opera in two acts by the Ducal music-director Nohr, under the title

of _Die Wunderbaren Lichter_, founded upon a Thuringian tradition, was

lately produced here. This is the second great effort of M. Nohr as a

composer, and was received with well-merited applause; he was called

forward at the conclusion.

BRUNSWICK.

M. Albert Methfessel has, since his appointment as Kapellmeister last

year, strained every nerve to raise the opera to a degree of perfection

to which we had hitherto been strangers. The prime donne of the grand

opera are at present Mesdames Cornet and Franchetti, the former a

most delightful and finished bravura singer. The principal tenor is

M. Cornet, the idol of the frequenters of the opera, who is not less

gifted and accomplished as an excellent dramatic singer than as a

sterling good actor.

There is at present here a Dlle. Bertha Lewig, aged fifteen years,

a pupil of M. Methfessel, who displays wonderful proficiency on the

piano-forte.

BERNBURG.

A series of subscription concerts, which commenced here in December

last, terminated on the 9th March; they were under the direction of

M. Victor Klauss, a young and talented composer. The principal solo

performers were MM. Probst and Fischer, on the violin; M. Wustenhagen,

on the clarionet; M. Bosse, sen., on the oboe; M. Klotzsch, on the

violoncello; and M. Bosse, jun., on the flute. M. Klauss, too,

himself also delighted us with two very excellent performances on the

piano-forte. Some overtures and symphonies of Mozart and Beethoven

were not only faultless in their performance, but really presented a

very rich source of musical enjoyment. The singers consisted of a few

members of M. Atmer’s theatrical company, besides some dillettanti of

great ability.

ATTENBURG.

The New Dessau Opera Company of M. Jul. Miller, commenced their

performances here on the 10th March. The music director, M. Ed. Theile,

a pupil of Fried. Schneider’s, is already known to the public as the

author of some clever piano-forte composition.

THE DRAMA.

~King’s Theatre.~

After nearly a season has passed away, in which nothing but old, mostly

feeble, operas, filled by second and third-rate performers, have been

given to the subscribers--for the _public_ have been too wise to pay

their money for nothing,--we all at once find the theatre so crowded

with singers that they actually jostle each other in the lobby. When

the house stood in need of attraction, when the best management, the

utmost activity, would hardly have enabled the lessee to pay his

expenses, he furnished neither opera nor singer, ballet nor dancer,

that drew enough to meet the rent. When Easter was turned--when that

season had arrived in which, if the doors are opened, the house is

lighted, and a set of puppets are placed on the stage, multitudes

will go to see them--at that season we find a double _troupe_, and

fragments of different operas given on the same night, in order that

the performers may have some employment, and not lose their voices for

want of use!

On the 27th of April _La Cenerentola_, one of ~Rossini’s~ most insipid

operas, was performed, Mad. ~Cinti~ as _Angelina_, whose musical

and flexible though not strong voice, and refined taste, the result

of a perfect knowledge of her art, imparted a charm to what was

originally weak and has been hacked for years. ~Donzelli~ was _Ramiro_,

~Tamburini~ _Dandino_, and ~Zuchelli~ the _Magnifico_, all of whom

sustained their parts well; but the two sisters very nearly spoiled the

whole, by the contrast they formed with the rest, and ~Tamburini~ only

reconciled us to his excessive flourishing by the beauty of his voice

and intonation.

On Thursday the 2nd of May, Madame ~Pasta~ reappeared, after an absence

of two seasons, in _Anna Bolena_, an opera indebted for its continued

existence solely to her performance: in ordinary hands it could not

have survived one night in London. This admirable performer is just

what she was, in person, voice, and action; and we have only to refer

our readers to the opinions we have formerly given on the subject, for

those entertained by us now. She was received by a crowded house in the

warm manner that her great and yet unabated talents gave her a right to

expect.

_Tancredi_ was the second opera got up for Madame ~Pasta~, and in this

she afforded even more pleasure to real connoisseurs than in the part

of _Anna Bolena_, for the music is not only goad, but to be reckoned

among ~Rossini’s~ best. Her _entrata_ was splendid; the recitative ‘Oh!

Patria!’ and aria, ‘Tu che accendi,’ with its popular second movement,

were perfect. Madame ~Cinti’s~ _Amenaide_ was, as regards singing,

not less excellent; and her very different voice, so far from being a

disadvantage on the present occasion, operated favourably, by giving

a greater individuality to each character. ~Rubini’s~ _Argirio_ was

a continued series of roulades, except when, by sudden bursts of his

voice, he made those near him start, and by pianos alternating with

these, he became inaudible to all but such as he had alarmed by his

sforzatos. We have never entertained but one opinion of this singer,

who has been so vaunted in the French journals, and find that an able

contemporary agrees with us. The _Spectator_ says of this performer,

that--

‘Of true feeling he has not a particle. _Per esempio_--when he visits

his daughter in prison and in chains, and she asks--

‘Tu quì, o padre! a che vieni?’

his reply was delivered with as much indifference and flippancy as if

the question had related to the weather, or the last new bonnet; and

yet the words are these--

‘---- ad abbracciarti;

A seguirti alla tomba. In sen di padre

Si tenta in vano suffocar natura.’

The truth is, that with singers like Rubini, the art of dramatic

singing is a mere effort of the _muscles_; with Pasta, one of the

_mind_.’

~Zuchelli~ had but little to do, but did that well. Many changes were

made in the opera; original pieces were left out, strange and not

appropriate ones put in, just as the caprice of the singers dictated;

and the choruses were wretched. _Il Pirata_, another old opera, is

getting up, and this is certainly Bellini’s best work; indeed the only

one of his known to this theatre that has the smallest merit.

Drury-Lane Theatre.

What properly is called the _English_ stage is at its last gasp. Covent

Garden is closed except to foreign performers: its company has been

obliged to seek refuge in a theatre which most of our provincial towns

would scoff at. Mr. Arnold has prudently withdrawn from the Adelphi,

and his performers are doing what they can for themselves; that is,

just keeping that small house open three times a week. Mr. Morris feels

the necessity of closing his doors when the two _national_ theatres,

the _legitimate_, the patent theatres, are opened by foreigners, and

nothing but German, or Italian, or French productions heard therein. A

Sunday paper of the 5th ult. well observes, speaking of the banishment

of the English drama from Covent Garden theatre,--‘This feared event

has, at length come to pass. What Laporte means to do with Covent

Garden we have not heard; but he is in treaty with Paganini, and we

suppose that he will resort to some other foreign performances. It is a

singular fact, and it can hardly fail to produce its effect, that ~OUR

NATIONAL DRAMA~ was finally expelled from one of our great theatres,

while “a native of France was its lessee.” What would have been said

by the French, if an English actor had been director of the _Théâtre

Francais_, and had adopted measures by which the plays of Corneille,

Racine, and Moliere were driven to the Port St. Martin?’ And with what

show of reason do certain writers in our journals exclaim against the

salaries of English _stars_, as they are called, when they know, but

are silent, that Madame Devrient receives nearly three times as much

per night, and Madame Malibran more than seven times, what our first

and best performers could ever obtain? Farren, Braham, and Liston, it

is said, have, or had, twenty pounds a night: Madame Devrient has at

least _fifty_; and Madame Malibran _one hundred and fifty_, though she

does draw enough to pay her own salary!

* * * * *

On the 1st of May, the Italian opera of ~Bellini~, _La Sonnambula_,

with English words adapted to it, was produced at this theatre, for

the debut of Mad. ~Malibran~. The drama is well known to our readers;

the music is of the most flimsy kind, and worthless in every sense of

the word, whether as relates to art, or to the theatre. Our English

operatic composers have not much distinguished themselves of late,

and the undoubted superiority of the German and French schools has

generated a taste among all classes in London for foreign music; but

this is no reason why anything so feeble as the work now under notice

should be patiently listened to, nay applauded. However, we will not

waste our reader’s time by further notice of so inferior a production.

The acting of Mad. ~Malibran~ as the somnambulist, is of a very mixed

kind; sometimes she surprises by traits of extraordinary genius, and

occasionally she exhibits extravagancies that prove a want of any real

knowledge of the first principles of the histrionic art. As a singer,

she certainly is much more perfect. Nature has bestowed on her a voice

rarely equalled, and education has made her an excellent musician. Her

natural taste we believe to be good, but, following the fashion of the

day, it has become vitiated, and her ornaments are so redundant as

often to be ridiculous. These however, are so nicely executed, that

they seduce even the best critics, and lead them to applaud what in

their sober senses they could not but disapprove.

Mad. ~Malibran~ has since appeared in the English opera _The Devil’s

Bridge_, as _Count Belino_, and if her roulades, her admirably

performed freaks, are absurd in Italian arias, how much more so in

English songs! She entirely failed in this attempt, and though the

opera was performed a second time, the public, prejudiced though they

now are in favour of foreigners, whatever their pretensions, could not

be brought to witness another such performance.

Beethoven’s _Fidelio_ has been produced here, Mad. ~Schrœder Devrient~

and M. ~Haitzinger~ in the characters they sustained so well last year

at the King’s Theatre. The number of subscription and benefit concerts

which we feel it a duty to attend, have prevented our yet being present

at the performance of this opera at Drury Lane.

THE MUSIC OF THE PRESENT NUMBER.

Who the composer is of the trio, ‘Like a bright cherub,’ has long

been a matter of dispute, and the point most likely will never now be

settled by any decisive proof. The question, however, lies in a narrow

compass, for it is agreed that to either Handel or John Christopher

Smith[57] the work belongs. Prevailing opinion ascribes it to the

former, and we believe correctly, judging from internal evidence as

well as traditional testimony. _Gideon_, the oratorio of which it forms

a part, was a pasticcio, a selection of music by various authors,

adapted to a dramatic poem by Smith, but when and where performed the

most diligent inquiry has not enabled us to ascertain; in fact, no

record whatever of it seems to be in existence; it was never published,

and we cannot learn that a copy of it remains. The trio now inserted is

the only part of it that ever came under our view, and was printed some

fifty years ego by Birchall, about the time when sung at the Ancient

Concerts. The sweet melody of this, and its effective simplicity when

the three parts come together, ought to recommend it to private musical

parties.

* * * * *

The aria by Mozart is No. 20 of his thirty _Gesaenge_, or detached

airs not appertaining to any of his operas, published by Breitkopf and

Härtel, at Leipzig.

* * * * *

The two movements by Avison are from his fourth Concerto, Book

IV.--a beautiful and clever composition, still performed at the

Ancient Concerts, and always with applause. To these we may apply an

observation which appears in Avison’s Preface to his Concertos,--‘If

music be composed agreeably to principles founded in nature, the true

judge of harmony always approves it, whatever name, style, or national

character it bears.’

* * * * *

The _aria_, as he calls it, of Beethoven, is one of the most exquisite

_morceaux_ of this great master. There is a calm dignity in it which

excites a wish that it had been set to words--to poetry worthy of it.

The two variations, selected from many, are not less striking proofs of

the richness of his fancy.

* * * * *

The song by Labarre is from a recent number of _La Revue Musicale_.

The originality of this recommended it to us, and will, we have no

doubt, be apparent to all; though some may at first think it rather too

elaborate for a _chanson_. It will, however, be more admired the more

it is known.

[Sidenote: July, 1833.]

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF JOHN TRAVERS, WILLIAM HAYES, ~Mus.~ D., THOMAS

SAUNDERS DUPUIS, ~Mus.~ D., ~and~ EDMUND AYRTON, ~Mus.~ D.

John Travers received his musical education in St. George’s Chapel,

Windsor, and having gained the good will of Dr. Godolphin, Dean of St.

Paul’s and Provost of Eton College, was by him put apprentice to Dr.

Greene. About the year 1725 he succeeded Kelway as organist of St.

Paul’s, Covent Garden, and subsequently became organist of Fulham. On

the decease of Jonathan Martin, in 1737, Travers was appointed organist

of the Chapels Royal, when he relinquished his situation at Fulham. He

died in 1758, and his successor in the King’s Chapel was Dr. Boyce.

‘Travers,’ says Sir John Hawkins, who knew him well, ‘was a sound

musician; he commenced an early acquaintance with Dr. Pepusch, and

received some assistance from him in the course of his studies, which

by sedulous application he was very careful to improve. In the Chapel

books are sundry anthems of his composition; but as composer he is

best known to the world by eighteen Canzonets, being verses and songs

taken from the posthumous works of Prior, which he set for two and

three voices, in a style as elegant as it is original. Besides these he

published the whole book of Psalms for one, two, three, four, and five

voices, with a thorough-bass for the harpsichord[58].’

Dr. Burney, speaking of Travers, says, ‘His compositions, however pure

the harmony, can only be ranked with pieces of mechanism, which labour

alone may produce, without the assistance of genius[59]’. But this

criticism is no less inconsiderate than severe. To his compositions for

the church it may apply, but his canzonets--many of them at least--have

stood the test of time, and, popular as they were when first brought

forth, are still as much as ever admired for their genius, their

originality, as well as their beauty and contrivance, by all impartial

judges of English music; among whom Dr. Burney certainly cannot

properly be reckoned, so strong were his prejudices in favour of the

Italian school; though latterly the German composers, Haydn especially,

had some share of his esteem.

In Arnold’s _Collection of Cathedral Music_, are a Morning Service, a

Te Deum, and one Anthem, by Travers, which do not exhibit any creative

powers: his best sacred composition is the anthem, ‘Ascribe unto the

Lord,’ and this is still occasionally performed in the King’s Chapel.

* * * * *

~William Hayes~, Doctor in Music, was born at Gloucester, in 1707, and

giving early proofs of a musical disposition, was admitted a chorister

of the cathedral, under Mr. Hine, the organist, where as a boy he early

distinguished himself as a solo singer, and soon arrived at a high

degree of excellence as an organ-player. On quitting Gloucester, he

was appointed organist of Shrewsbury, and shortly afterwards succeeded

to the same situation in the Cathedral of Worcester. But after the

lapse of a few years, a vacancy occurring in the office of organist and

master of the choristers at Magdalen College, Oxford, he obtained that

appointment, which having been the ultimate object of his ambition, he

retained till his death. In 1735 he proceeded to a Bachelor’s degree in

music, and some years after, on the death of Mr. Goodson, was elected

Professor of Music to the University. On the opening of the Radcliffe

Library, in 1749, he was honoured with a doctor’s degree, to which he

was presented by Dr. Bradley, Savilian Professor of Astronomy, who, in

an elegant Latin speech, represented him not only as a man eminent in

his faculty, but as possessed of other estimable qualities, among which

sweetness of temper was mentioned as not the least remarkable.

In 1753 Dr. Hayes published his ‘Remarks on Mr. Avison’s Essay on

Musical Expression,’ which were drawn from him in consequence of

what he considered a covert attack on Handel by the author of that

well-known, and in many respects able, critical work; but he here

manifested more knowledge of his subject than control of temper; and

his observations,--though many of them are very just, while some are

rather hypercritical,--lose much of their force from the asperity of

language in which they were uttered, a fault only to be accounted for,

in one of so mild a disposition, from his enthusiastic admiration of

the illustrious composer whom he vindicated.

On the establishment of the Catch-Club, Dr. Hayes, in 1773, obtained

three out of the six prizes given that year, one of his successful

compositions being that exquisitely beautiful but brief piece of simple

counterpoint, the Glee, ‘Melting airs soft joys inspire.’ This, and the

lovely Round, ‘Wind, gentle evergreen,’ are enough to transmit his name

to posterity, had he produced nothing else; but his _Cathedral Music

in Score_, comprising a full service and upwards of twenty anthems,

published after his decease by his son, Dr. Philip Hayes, will continue

to be highly valued so long as this species of composition shall

continue in use. His Canon, ‘Let’s drink, and let’s sing together,’ is

mentioned by Dr. Burney (in Rees’ Cyclopædia) as ‘the most pleasant of

those laboured compositions which go under the name of Canon.’

Dr. Hayes, after suffering three years from the effects of a paralytic

stroke, died in 1777, and was succeeded in all his appointments at

Oxford by his above-mentioned son[60].

* * * * *

~Thomas Saunders Dupuis~, Doctor in Music, was in 1733 born in this

country, though his parents were natives of France. His father held

some situation at court under George II., and this probably was the

reason why his son was placed in the Chapel Royal. The first rudiments

of his education were received from Mr. Gates. He afterwards became a

pupil of Travers, at that time organist of the King’s Chapel, and for

whom, in the early part of his life, he officiated as deputy.

‘On the death of Dr. Boyce, in 1779, Mr. Dupuis was appointed organist

and composer to the Chapel Royal; and it is probable that the Bishop

of London (Lowth) never exercised his taste and judgment more properly

than by nominating so worthy a man to so respectable a situation.’

_Bingley’s Musical Biography_, ii. 215.

In 1784 he was named as one of the assistant-directors of the

Commemoration of Handel; and in 1790 was admitted to the degree of

Doctor in Music by the University of Oxford. He died in consequence

of taking an excessive dose of opium, at his house in Park Lane, on

the 17th of June, 1796. His successors were Mr. Knyvett, senior, as

organist of the Royal Chapels, and Mr. Attwood as composer to his

Majesty.

Dr. Dupuis published several compositions, among which his _Organ

Pieces_ and two _Sets of Chants_ are the most valuable; but his

reputation is more permanently based on his services and anthems,

written for the use of the King’s Chapel, a selection of which was

printed after his death, in two handsome volumes, by his pupil and

friend, John Spencer, Esq., son-in-law and nephew to the late Duke of

Marlborough. These consist of four Services, and fourteen Anthems in

score; and in Page’s _Harmonia Sacra_ are two other of his Anthems,

‘The Lord, even the most mighty God,’ and ‘I cried unto the Lord,’

which were published during the life of the author.

Great knowledge and taste are more conspicuous in Dr. Dupuis’

compositions than any very great brilliancy of genius; but they are

by no means deficient in invention, though this was curbed by his

devotedness to the school of music in which he had been educated,

and of which he was to the last a most uncompromising defender. His

Services, particularly those in ~E~ flat and ~C~, are as beautiful in

melody, as they are skilful, considered as specimens of writing in

parts. Of his anthems, ‘The souls of the righteous,’ ‘Bow down thine

ear,’ and ‘Be thou my judge,’ will long continue as records of his

ability as a harmonist; and ‘The Lord is my shepherd,’ ‘Lord, what love

have I unto thy law,’ together with ‘Teach me, O Lord,’ can never cease

to please the admirers of graceful, flowing air. As a performer on the

organ, he was excelled by no Englishman of his time; his extemporaneous

fugues were the admiration of all lovers of this kind of music, and

drew multitudes to hear him at the conclusion of the service at the

Royal Chapel.

Dr. Dupuis was a most worthy and amiable man, successful in worldly

matters, but unfortunate in his family. He followed his eldest son (a

clergyman) to the grave, and bequeathed a handsome fortune to an only

remaining one, who thoughtlessly dissipated the whole of it in his

power, and died at an early age.

* * * * *

The Harmonicon. Part the First · 第 4 / 8 章