C.L.L.

_Master John Shorne_ (Vol. ii., p. 387.).--Mr. Thoms, in his curious notes

on this personage, has expressed much regret that fuller details relating

to a representation of _Magister Johannes Schorn_ at Cawston, Norfolk,

communicated to the Archæological Institute by the Rev. James Bulwer, had

not been preserved in the _Archæological Journal_. I believe that the

omission was solely in deference to Mr. Bulwer's intention of giving in

another publication the results of his inquiries, and those persons who may

desire detailed information regarding Master John will do well to peruse

Mr. Bulwer's curious memoir in the _Norfolk Archæology_, vol. ii. p. 280.,

published March 1849, where representations of the figure at Cawston, and

of another at Gateley, Norfolk, are given. There seems to be no evidence

that Sir John, although in both instances pourtrayed with _nimbus_, had

been actually canonized and it is deserving of notice that in no ancient

evidence hitherto cited is he designated as a Saint, but merely as Master,

or Sir John. I am surprised that Dr. Husenbeth, who is so intimately

conversant with the examples of hagiotypic symbols existing in Norfolk,

should not have given him even a supplementary place in his most useful

manual of the _Emblems of Saints_, recently published. (Burns, 1850, 12mo.)

I have sought for Sir John in vain, in either section of that valuable

work. It occurs neither under the names of saints, nor in the series of

emblems.

Notes and Queries, Number 57, November 30, 1850 · 第 86 / 131 题