TRENDELENBURG, A.:
view of judgment, 147.
TRUTH: criterion of, 84;
Bosanquet's conception of, 105;
popular criterion of, 105 ff.;
and purpose, Study XI;
representational _versus_ teleological view of, 341 ff.;
criterion of, 361 ff.;
(see Objectivity, Validity).
UEBERWEG:
view of judgment, 147.
UNIFORMITY:
of nature, 206.
UNITY:
of the world, 207.
UNIVERSAL:
first and second according to Lotze, 56, 59, 69;
ideas as, 97 ff., 113;
judgment as, 136;
Mr. Royce's treatment of, 354 ff.;
necessity and, 357.
VALIDITY:
of thought, 7, 8;
relation to genesis, 14, 15;
test, 17, 18;
defines content of thought, 24;
problem of, Study IV;
Lotze's dilemma regarding, 71-85;
of bare object of thought, 72-6;
of activity of thought, 76-82;
of product of thought, 82-5;
(see Objectivity, Reality, Truth).
VALUE:
Lotze's distinction of, from existence, 28, 29;
view criticised, 31, 41, 45;
organized, of experience, 42-8;
determined in and by a logical process, 233;
nature of consciousness of, 273, 333-5;
function of consciousness of, 335-7;
properly mediate and functional in character, 338-40.
VALUATION (see also Ethical judgment, Economic judgment):
includes only ethical and economic types of judgment, 227, 236,
338-40;
general account of process of, 272, 295;
reconstructive of self as well as of reality, 312.
VENN, JOHN:
origin of hypothesis, 169.
"WARRANT":
consciousness of, accompanies purely factual as well as valuational
judgment processes, 276, 277;
the constitutive feature of survey of factual conditions, 278, 279.
WELTON, J.:
origin of hypothesis, 171.
WHEWELL, WILLIAM, 163;
view of sensations and ideas, 164, 165;
of induction, 165;
a certain agreement between him and Mill, 166.
WIESER, F. VON, 335 note 2.
WILL:
as related to thought, 366 note;
(see Activity, End, Purpose).
WUNDT, W.:
view of judgment, 147;
view of mathematical induction, 173;
formation and proof of hypothesis, 177 ff.;
distinction between supposition and hypothesis, 178 ff.
"WRONG" (see "Bad").
XENOPHANES:
his logical position, 216.
ZENO:
his dialectic, 214.