A LITTLE BOY’S COOLNESS.

The suit of William O’Connor against the Boston and Lowell Railroad at

Lawrence has resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in $10,000, one-half

the amount sued for. This suit grew out of an accident which occurred

August 27th, 1880. The plaintiff was the father of a child then between

five and six years old. He and his brother, three years older, were

crossing a private way maintained by the railroad for the Essex Company,

and the younger boy, while walking backward, stepped between the rail and

planking of the roadway inside and was unable to extricate his foot. At

that moment the whistle of a train was heard within a few hundred feet

and out of sight around a curve, and it appeared from the evidence that

the older brother, finding himself unable to relieve his brother, ran

down the track toward the train; but finding that he could not attract

the attention of the trainmen to his brother’s condition, and that he

must be run over, ran back to him, and, telling him to lie down, pulled

him outward and down and held him there until the train had passed. Both

feet of the little fellow were cut off or mangled so that amputation was

necessary. The theory of the defence was that the boy was not caught,

but while running across the track, fell and was run over. But the

testimony of the older brother was unshaken in every particular. It

would be difficult to match the nerve, thoughtfulness, and disregard of

self displayed by this boy, who at that time was less than nine years

old.

Railway Adventures and Anecdotes: Extending over More Than Fifty Years · 第 260 / 313 题