AT FAULT.

It is rather a serious matter that our public companies, and especially

our railway companies, are doing their best to degrade our language. I

am not going to be squeamish and object strongly to the use of the word

_Metropolitan_, though I think it indefensible. Still, it is too bad of

them to persist in using the word _bye-laws_ for _by-laws_—so

establishing solidly a shocking error. The word _bye_ has no existence

in England except as short for _be with you_, in the phrase _Good-bye_.

The so called by-laws are simple laws by the other laws, and have nothing

to do with any form of salutation. In a bill of the Great Western

Railway I find the announcement that tickets obtained in London on any

day from December 20th to 24th will be available for use on _either_ of

those days—this _either_ meaning the five days from the 20th December to

the 24th inclusive. Either of five! After this I am not surprised that,

in a contribution of my own to a daily paper, the editor gravely altered

the phrase _the last-named_, applied to one of three people, to _latter_.

In a railway advertisement I read a day or two ago, “From whence.” Now,

what is the good of such fine words as _whence_ and _thence_ if they are

thus to be ill-used? Surely the railway companies might have some one

capable of seeing that their grammar has some pretence to correctness.

—_Gentleman’s Magazine_.

Railway Adventures and Anecdotes: Extending over More Than Fifty Years · 第 232 / 313 题