CHAPTER V.

THE MIDDLE AGES.

We cannot easily determine on a date at which we can assign a

beginning to mediæval art. It differs from the art that succeeded it

in the sixteenth century in many respects, and from the late classic

art that preceded it still more widely. That peculiar character which

we call romantic enters into the art of mediæval times, as it does

into the literature and manners of the same ages. It took a living

form in the half religious institution of chivalry. The northern

nations grew up under the leadership of monks quite as much as under

that of kings. They lived in territories only partially cleared from

forests, pushed their way forward to power pioneered by the great

religious orders, and their world was one surrounded by opportunities

of endless adventures. But this romantic standard, though it took its

rise from the times in which the Christians carried their lives in

their hands, under the persecuting emperors, did not pervade Europe

for many centuries. Classic art, in its decay, still furnished both

forms and symbols, such, _e.g._, as that of Orpheus, to the new

societies, and the names of Jupiter, Mercury, and Saturn, have

survived as the titles of days of the week. The two art traditions

overlapped each other for a while. Mediævalism grew very gradually.

We have just said that Charlemagne welcomed Byzantine artists to the

Rhine. It must be remembered, however, that the Roman empire had been

firmly planted beyond the Alps, and that Gaul produced good Roman art

in the second and third centuries. Architecture, sculpture, bronze

casting, and the numberless appliances of daily life were completely

Roman in many parts of France and Britain. The theatres and

amphitheatres of Arles and Orange and the collections in various

museums are enough to show how extended this character was. It was

not till the old traditions had been much developed or modified by

oriental influences that a thorough mediæval character of art was

established in Italy, France, Germany, and England. To the last it

remained semi-classic in Rome itself.

We can give reference to few specimens of household furniture or

to woodwork of any kind before the eleventh century, with a great

exception to be noticed presently. Ivories, in any form, belonging

to these ages are rare. The best objects are Byzantine. Anglo-saxon

ivories, though not unknown, are all but unique examples. Ivory was

probably rarely employed for any objects of secular use, unless on

mirror cases, combs, or the thrones of kings; on horns, caskets, sword

hilts, and the like.

Metallurgy in the precious metals and in bronze, including the gilding

of bronze, was probably the one art that survived the departure, if

it had not even preceded the invasion, of the Romans in Britain. It is

scarcely probable that tin and copper ores would have been sought for

from Britain if manufactured ornaments of metal had not found their

way in the first instance from this country to the south. Be that,

however, as it may, the art of metallurgy survived the downfall of

such architectural and sculpturesque skill as had been attained in

England under Roman traditions; and that metal thrones, chairs, and

other utensils were made here as in Gaul can hardly be doubted.

There is an interesting collection, lately bequeathed by Mr. Gibbs,

of Saxon ornaments in gold, bronze, and bronze ornamented with gilding

and enamel, in the South Kensington museum. These objects were dug up

chiefly at Faversham, a village in Kent. Most of these antiquities

are _fibulæ_, brooches, and buckles, or portions of horse trappings,

bosses, &c., and not recognisable as parts of bronze furniture,

such as the chair of Dagobert. But it is difficult to examine these

personal ornaments and not believe that during the Saxon occupation

bronze thrones, tripods, mirrors, and other objects of household use

were also made.

The earliest example of mediæval furniture in the Kensington museum is

a cast of the chair known as that of Dagobert, in the Louvre. A full

description and history of this chair is to be found in the large

catalogue, n^{o.} 68: and we here give a woodcut of it. This work (it

is said) was executed by a monk.

[Illustration]

When we consider the rapacity of the barbarian inroads into Italy and

Rome, and the amount of spoil carried bodily away from Constantinople,

Rome, and the great municipal centres of Italy, it is remarkable that

so little precious furniture should have survived in other parts

of Europe. The Goths under Adolphus in the fifth century carried an

immense plunder into Gaul and Spain. "When the treasuries, after the

conquest of Spain," says Gibbon, "were plundered by the Arabs, they

admired, and they have celebrated, a table of considerable size, of

one single piece of solid emerald [that is, glass], encircled with

three rows of fine pearls, supported by three hundred and sixty-five

feet of gems and massy gold, estimated at the price of five hundred

thousand pieces of gold,"--probably the most expensive table on

record. It is the value of the materials that has prevented the

preservation of many such objects, while the chair of Dagobert is of

gilt bronze only.

Early mediæval art, included under the general name of Gothic,

continued down to the twelfth century full of Romanesque forms and

details. Figures were clothed in classic draperies, but stiff and

severe with upright lines and childish attempts to indicate the limbs

or joints beneath. Nevertheless, the work of these centuries, rude

and archaic as it is, is full of dignity and force. The subjects were

often sacred, sometimes of war or incidents of the chase. These last

were commonly mixed with animals, lions and dogs, or eagles and hawks,

or leaves of the acanthus and other foliage. Throughout these ages the

foliated sculpture, the paintings of books and carving of ivory,

and no doubt of wood also, was, moreover, composed in endless

convolutions, such as may be seen on sculptured stones in Ireland and

on the Norwegian doors of the twelfth century. Whether the different

convolutions are formed by figures or dragons, or by stalks of foliage

twined and knotted together in bold curved lines, symmetrically

arranged, each portion is generally carefully designed and traceable

through many windings as having a distinct intention and purpose.

Ornamental work was thus apparently conventional, but made up of

individual parts separately carried out, and in some degree, though

not altogether, realistic: a character gradually lost after the early

thirteenth century till the new revival in the sixteenth.

The tenth century was not favourable to the development of the

requirements or comfort of personal life. Towards the year one

thousand a superstition prevailed over many parts of Europe that the

world would come to an end when the century was completed; and many

fields were left uncultivated in the year 999. The eleventh century

made a great advance in architecture and other arts, but down to the

Norman invasion our own country was far behind the continental nations

in the fine arts; metallurgy only excepted. The Anglo-saxons perhaps

advanced but very slowly, as the century wore on to the period of the

Norman conquest; and manners remained exceedingly simple.

Early illuminations, though conventional, give us some details of

Anglo-saxon houses. They were of one story, and contained generally

only one room. The addition of a second was rare before the Norman

conquest. The furniture of the room consisted of a heavy table,

sometimes fixed; on which the inhabitants of the house and the guests

slept. A bedstead was occasionally reserved for the mistress of the

house. Bedsteads when used by the women or the lord of the house were

enclosed in a shed under the wall of enclosure and had a separate

roof, as may be seen in many manuscripts. In the Bayeux tapestry a

bed roof is tiled, and the framework shut in with curtains. In many

instances such a design represents only a tester with posts. Otherwise

beds of straw stuffed into a bag or case were spread on the table,

and soldiers laid their arms by their heads ready for use in case of

alarm. Benches, some with lion or other heads at the corners, like

elongated chairs or settles (with backs, for the lord and lady of

the house), were the usual seats. Thrones, something like that of

Dagobert, were the property of kings. King Edward the Confessor is

seated on such a chair (metal, and in the Roman shape) in the Bayeux

tapestry, and folding chairs of various forms, more or less following

classical types, were used by great personages. Benches were also used

as beds; so were the lids or tops of chests, the sack or bag being

sometimes kept in it and filled with straw when required. The tables

were covered with cloths at dinner. Stained cloths and tapestries,

commonly worked with pictorial designs, were used to hang the walls

of the house or hall. They were called wah-hrægel, wall coverings.

Personal clothing was kept in chests of rude construction. Silver

candlesticks were used in churches. Candles were stuck anywhere in

houses, on beams or ledges.

With regard to carriages during the Saxon and Anglo-norman period,

carts on two wheels were common for agricultural use, and served to

transport the royal property. Four-wheeled cars drawn by hand labour

are used for carrying warlike stores in the Bayeux tapestry. In the

battle of the Standard the standard of the English host was carried

on a wheeled car or platform, and remained as the head-quarters or

rallying point during action.

The Norman invasion of England caused a new advance in the luxury

and refinement, such as it was, of daily life. The houses began to

grow--upper rooms or rooms at the side of the great hall were added,

called solars (solaria), the sunny or light rooms. These seem to have

been appropriated to the ladies. In due time they added a parloir or

talking room, a name derived from the rooms in which conversation

was allowed in monasteries where silence was the general rule. In

the upper rooms fireplaces were made occasionally, but not always

chimneys. In the halls, when the upper room did not cover the whole

under room or when an upper room was not constructed, fire was made

in the centre of the floor. Stairs were of wood. Glass was all but

unknown in the windows of houses, and wooden shutters kept out the

weather.

The houses of landowners in England were called manoir or manor. The

furniture was simple and consisted of few objects. The table was on

trestles; the seats were benches. _Armaria_, armoires, cupboards or

presses, either stood in recesses in the wall or were complete wooden

enclosures. These had doors opening horizontally. The frames were not

panelled. The doors were ledge doors of boards, nailed to stout cross

bars behind, and decorated with iron hinges and clamps beaten out into

scrolls and other ornaments.

[Illustration]

Bedrooms were furnished with ornamental bed testers, and benches at

the bed foot. Beds were furnished with quilts and pillows, and with

spotted or striped linen sheets; over all was laid a covering of green

say, badgers' furs, the skins of beavers or of martin cats, and a

cushion. A perch for falcons to sit on was fixed in the wall. A chair

at the bed head, and a perch or projecting pole on which clothes could

be hung, completed the furniture of the Anglo-norman bedroom. In the

foregoing woodcut from Willemin there is no tester, but carving on the

posts, and the coverings are of the richest description.

Woodwork was decorated with painted ornament or with fanciful work

on the hinges; and nails and clamps were applied to hold it together,

rather than with sculpture, down to the fourteenth century; and in

England, France, and Germany, oak was the wood employed for furniture.

Both in England and in the countries which had retained old artistic

traditions on the continent, such as Italy, France, and Spain (which

profited by the skill of the Moors in painted decoration), colour was

used not less on walls and wood than on metal and pottery. Tapestry

was an important portion of the furniture of all houses of the richer

classes.

During the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries mediæval art in Europe

reached its greatest perfection. The classic traditions were at last

forgotten everywhere except in Rome itself, where a chain lingered

almost continuous between the old ideas and those which succeeded in

the sixteenth century. Elsewhere the feeling in sculpture, whether of

wood or other materials, was in unison with the pointed architecture

and reigned unchallenged. All sorts of enrichments were used in the

decoration of furniture. A chest of the time of John is preserved in

the castle of Rockingham. It is of oak richly decorated with hammered

iron plates, hinges, &c. The jewel chest of Richard of Cornwall was

long preserved in the state treasury of Aix-la-Chapelle, and is now at

Vienna. It belongs to the first half of the century, and was left at

Aix when Richard was crowned king of the Romans. The body is of oak

decorated with wrought-iron hinges, lock, and clamps, and with bosses

of metal on which are enamelled heraldic shields.

The construction of woodwork gradually became more careful and

scientific. Panelled framework came into use, though seldom for

doors of rooms. With this method of construction the chests were

put together that formed the chief article of furniture during two

centuries in the mediæval sleeping, sitting, or private room.

In the middle of the thirteenth century Eleanor of Provence was

escorted on her journey to England by an army of ladies, knights,

nobles and troubadours, from Provence to the shores of the channel.

Kings were continually making progress in this manner through their

dominions, like the Indian governors of our own days, and carried

their furniture and property in chests, called standards, on the backs

of mules or sumpter horses. Portable furniture and hangings were the

principal objects of household use on such occasions. A precept in

the twentieth year of the reign of Henry the third directed that "the

king's great chamber at Westminster be painted a green colour like a

curtain, that in the great gable frontispiece of the said chamber

a French inscription should be painted, and that the king's little

wardrobe should be painted of a green colour to imitate a curtain."

The queen's chamber was decorated with historical paintings. Remains

of similar wall decoration are in tolerable preservation still in one

of the vaulted rooms of Dover castle.

Till the fourteenth century candles were generally placed on a beam

in the hall, whether in the castle of a king or baron. Frames of wood

with prickets were also suspended for the lighting of rooms, or were

fixed to the sides of the fire-place when that was made in the wall

and had a chimney constructed for it. More generally, as regards

halls, the hearth was in the middle of the room and a lantern

just above it in the roof acted as a chimney. Iron chandeliers, or

branches, were ordered to be fixed to the piers of the king's halls at

Oxford, Winchester, and other places. Though the royal table might be

lighted with valuable candlesticks of metal, they were not in general

use till a century later. Besides the numerous rows of tallow candles

pieces of pine wood were lighted and stuck into iron hasps in the

wall, or round the woodwork at the back of the dais to give more

abundant light.

The wardrobe was a special room fitted with hanging closets, and in

these clothes, hangings, linen, as well as spices and stores, were

preserved. This arrangement was common in all large castles during the

thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. Great preparations

were made in the bedrooms of queens of England to which they retired

before the birth of children. Henry the third directed that his

queen's bedroom should be freshly wainscoted and lined, and that a

list or border should be made, well painted with images of our

Lord and angels, with incense pots scattered over it; that the four

evangelists should be painted in the chamber, and a crystal vase be

made to keep his collection of relics.

Room panelling was introduced into England during the same reign.

Henry ordered a chamber at Windsor castle to be panelled with Norway

pines specially imported; the men worked day and night. The boards

were radiated and coloured, and two clear days only were allowed for

the fixing and completion.

[Illustration]

Edward the first married a Spanish queen, and household furniture was

further developed under his reign in many particulars. Pottery for the

table was imported from Spain, and oriental carpets were introduced; a

luxury naturally borrowed from the extensive use of them by the Moors

in that country. Italian artists had already been invited to England.

Master William, the Florentine, was master of the works at Guildford

castle. John of St. Omer was another foreign artist employed by Henry

the third. To the former of these we probably owe the introduction

into this country of the method of gilding and tooled gold work, with

which wood was decorated. Specimens of the work are still discernible

on the famous coronation chair (of which we give a woodcut, p. 49) in

Westminster abbey; made about the year 1300.

The decoration and comfort of furnished houses during Henry's reign

was further promoted by the general use of tapestry. Queen Eleanor is

traditionally and incorrectly said to have first brought this kind

of furniture into houses; it was certainly adopted for churches

at earlier periods, and hangings of various materials, stained or

embroidered, were employed as far back as the Anglo-saxon times.

Tapestries and cypress chests to carry them probably became more

general in Eleanor's reign.

Amongst the particulars collected in the history of the city companies

and by the record commission are lists of the royal plate, showing

that objects of personal use besides table plate were made in silver

and gold. We find mention of pitchers of gold and silver, plates and

dishes of silver, gold salts, alms bowls, silver hannapers or baskets,

a pair of knives with enamelled silver sheaths, a fork of crystal,

and a silver fork with handle of ebony and ivory, combs and

looking-glasses of silver. Edward had six silver forks and one of

gold. Ozier mats were laid over the benches on which he and his

queen sat at meals. These were also put under the feet, especially in

churches where the pavement was of stone or tiles.

In the furniture of bedrooms linen chests and settles, cupboards and

the beds themselves were of panelled wood. The next woodcut shows the

interior of a well-furnished bedroom, from a manuscript life of St.

Edmund written about the year 1400.

[Illustration]

Chests served as tables, and are often represented with chess-boards

on them in old illuminations, and husband and wife sitting on the

chest and using it for the game, which had become familiar to most

European nations. Chests of later date than the time of Edward, of

Italian make, still show the same use of the lids of coffers. As the

tops of the coffers served for tables, and for seats they began in the

thirteenth century to be furnished with a panelled back and arm-pieces

at either end. This development of the chest was equally common in

France. It does not seem to have been placed on legs or to have grown

into a cabinet till a later period. The raised dorsal or back of the

seats in large rooms was a protection from the cold, and in the rude

form of a _settle_ is still the comfort of old farm and inn kitchens

in this country; it became the general type of seats of state in the

great halls, and was there further enlarged by a canopy projecting

forwards to protect the heads of the sitters, panelled also in oak.

In the fifteenth century in many instances this hood or canopy was

attached to the panelling of the upper end of the hall, and covered

the whole of that side of the dais. The backing and canopy were

sometimes replaced by temporary arrangements of hangings, as in

modern royal throne rooms, the cloth being called cloth of estate and

generally embroidered with heraldic devices. Panelled closets called

_dressoirs_ or cupboards, to lock up food, were general in properly

furnished rooms; a cloth was laid on the top at meals, with lights,

and narrow shelves rose in steps at the back for the display of plate,

the steps varying in number according to the rank of the persons

served.

Tables used at meals were generally frames of boards, either in one

piece or folding in the middle. These were laid on trestles, as in the

woodcut from an early manuscript in the Bodleian library, and could

be removed as soon as the dinner was over, so that the company might

dance and divert themselves. Somewhat later, about the year 1450, the

tables although still on trestles were made more solidly, even for the

use of people of the middle class.

[Illustration]

All houses, however, even of kings could not be completely or even

comfortably furnished in such a manner, far less those of feudal

lords, not princes or sovereigns. The kings moved incessantly to their

various strongholds and manors in time of peace to collect dues and

revenues, much of which was paid in kind and could only be profitably

turned to account by carrying the Court to different estates and

living on their produce as long as it lasted. Orders were continually

sent to sheriffs to provide food, linen and other requisites, while

hangings and furniture were carried by the train in its progress. Much

of the household belongings of persons of wealth was, therefore, of

a movable kind. We engrave (p. 53) a very curious table standing on a

pedestal shaped like a chalice, from a manuscript of the beginning of

the fifteenth century. The ladies are playing at cards.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

A most oppressive privilege was exercised in France, which went beyond

the legal right of the lord or owner to the rents of his estates

whether paid in money, agricultural produce, or manufactures carried

on in his towns or villages. This was the _droit de prisage_, a

privilege of seizing furniture of all kinds by the hands of stewards

and others for the use of the king. Chairs, tables, and beds

particularly were included in these requisitions. The _droit

de prisage_ was modified at various times in consequence of the

remonstrance of the commons at so oppressive an exaction; but as late

as the year 1365 Charles the fifth seized beds. In 1313 Philippe le

Bel entertained the English king and his queen at Pontoise with no

other furniture than such as had been seized in this manner. A fire

broke out in the night during their stay, the furniture was consumed,

and the royal personages escaped in their shirts. It was not till 1407

that this privilege was finally abandoned.

Though the usual conveyance during the thirteenth century was a horse

litter for women of rank, and men rode on horseback, yet covered

and open carriages or waggons were not unknown in that and in the

following century. A charette containing a number of maids of honour

in attendance on Anne of Bohemia at her public reception in London in

1392, was upset on London bridge from the rush of the crowd to get

a sight of the queen, and her ladies were not without difficulty

replaced. These charettes, cars, or waggons were covered carts on four

wheels, like country waggons of our days, panelled at the sides, and

the tilt covered with leather, sometimes with lead, and painted.

[Illustration]

We must not pass without a very brief notice the large constructions

of roofs of wood begun as early as the twelfth, and continued and

improved through the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the period

during which the finest efforts of mediæval Gothic art were embodied

all over the north and over parts of the south of Europe. The older

part of Westminster hall dates from the reign of Rufus, and the walls

of the present building belong to that period, though faced at a later

time. How the roof of the enormous space, sixty-five feet diameter,

was at first constructed there is no evidence to show. It had,

perhaps, a row of arches down the middle, like the great hall of

the palace of Blois, said to be of the thirteenth century, or huge

kingposts supporting the ties between rafters, which in that case may

have been as long as those of the later roof. The present roof, work

of the fourteenth century, marks the beginning of a change in the

style of architecture that accompanied and caused great changes in

furniture and household woodwork. The ties are supported by curved

braces that descend like arches on the stone corbels made in the wall

to receive them. These braces take two flights, being tied back where

they meet by hammer beams into a lower part of the rafter. The lower

brace upholds another upright or collar post which supports the

junction of these beams with the rafter, at its weakest part. A rich

subdivision of upright mullions with cusped arch heads fills up the

spandrels between these braces and the beams they support, and adds

stiffness as well as decoration to the whole.

Such constructions were not only more scientific than those of older

date, but they are more pompous and complicated, and have a greater

apparent affinity with the architecture of the day. This architectural

character, from the date of the change to the third period of pointed

architecture, began to show itself in furniture and wood structure of

every kind. Until then a certain originality and inventiveness

were preserved in the decoration both of architective woodwork and

furniture, notwithstanding the strictest observance of the rules and

unities of architectural law in buildings, ecclesiastical and civil.

Small sculpture, such as that on ivories and utensils made of metal,

or that which decorated woodwork as well as stone, and the general

forms of furniture, were designed without immediate imitation of

architectonic detail. Figure sculpture of great dignity remains

in ivories of the twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth centuries,

illustrative of the general character given to things of daily use

which were not, probably, nearly so numerous as in a later age, and

were each carefully elaborated for the person for whom they were

made. We need go no further than some of the objects in the Kensington

museum, such as the statuettes and caskets of ivory, English and

French work of that time.

We can point to few large pieces of furniture, except the coronation

chair, illustrating the fashions of this early period. Examples of

wooden movable furniture are extremely rare in this country. There are

large semicircular cope chests in the cathedrals of Wells, York, and

other cities. These are merely chests or boxes in which the copes

are spread out full size, one over the other, and the only

decoration consists in the floriated ironwork attached to the hinges.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

We must not omit to remark that some examples of very beautiful

oriental panelling of this period are to be seen in various

collections. The woodcuts represent the fittings of a series of such

panels from a mosque at Cairo, now at South Kensington, n^{o.} 1,051;

and a single piece to show the detail. The delicacy of the carving

and the apparent intricacy of the geometrical arrangement are very

remarkable.

[Illustration: A royal dinner table, from a manuscript of the

fourteenth century.]

Ancient and Modern Furniture and Woodwork · 第 5 / 11 章